Upload
ean-sin
View
53
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Assignment
Citation preview
December 10
2013The higher the risk, the higher the potential return of an investment. We are comparing the performance of 10 chosen companies associated with an amount of risk in 5 different sectors.
Modern Portfolio Theory
Table of ContentsCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................2
CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL REVIEW............................................................................................4
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY....................................................................................................11
CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND RESULTS........................................................................................36
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION.........................................................................................................56
References....................................................................................................................................58
1
Prepared by:
Sin May Yee 212535Chan Chai Kuan 212607Tan Wei Kian 212543Yap Ping Way 212576
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
When there was risk, there will be the opportunity. As the well knows financial theory
describe, if there was high risk, there will be high return. For the investors who want to
gain more return, they need to take more risk. However, risk can be divided into two
types which are diversified and undiversified risk. Diversified risks are the risks that can
be eliminate through the combination of asset in a portfolio. Undiversified risk as the
name, it cannot be eliminate through the combination of asset in a portfolio. Although
diversified risks could be eliminate through the asset combination of the portfolio,
however, the total risk only will reduce as the assets in a portfolio are not perfectly
correlated with each other or it will be eliminate as the assets in a portfolio are perfect
negative correlated with each other. Hence, we conduct this study to understand the risk
diversification through portfolio from Modern Portfolio view. Modern Portfolio Theory
(MPT) was focus on statistical measurement to develop a portfolio plan. It focuses on the
measurement of expected return, standard deviation of return and correlation between
return.
RISK-RETURN SPECTRUM: Also known as Risk and Return Tradeoff, is the
relationship between the amount of return gained on an investment and the amount of risk
undertaken in that investment. The more return sought, the more risk that must be
undertaken. (Wikipedia, 2013) In other word, low levels of uncertainty or risk are
associated with low potential returns, whereas high levels of uncertainty or risk are
associated with high potential returns. According to the principle, invested money can
only render higher profits when it is subject to the possibility of being lost. Thus,
2
investors must be aware of the personal risk tolerance when making decision on
investment portfolio choices.
COMPANIES CHOSEN FOR STUDY: We have chosen 10 companies from different
sectors in the main board of Bursa Malaysia to conduct the statistical measurement of the
risk and return on a portfolio. These companies including:
Sectors Companies
Technology - Malaysian Pacific Industries Bhd (MPI)
- Unisem (M) Berhad
Plantations - Kuala Lumpur Kepong Bhd (KLK)
- Kulim Malaysia Bhd (KULIM)
Consumer
Products
- Hup Seng Industries Bhd (HUPSENG)
- Oriental Holdings Bhd (ORIENTAL)
Construction - Muhibbah Engineering (M) Bhd
(MUHIBBAH)
- Ekovest Bhd (EKOVEST)
Trading/
Services
- Yinson Holdings Berhad (YINSON)
- Borneo Oil Berhad (BORNOIL)
The detail of the measurement result will be presented in Excel form later
3
CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL REVIEW
Traditional portfolio analysis can be conveyed by the statement of Benjamin Graham that
commitment to a single security is neither investment nor rational speculation.
Traditional portfolio theory is a portfolio management practice which two parameters of
investment avenues are considered, i.e. (a) returns and (b) risk. It has some characteristics
as below:
Low or reasonable returns can be achieved when risk is low.
High returns can be achieved only when risk is high.
The co-relation between securities is not considered.
Risk is considered in totality, it is not subdivided into systematic and non-
systematic.
Selection of securities is done by matching risk and returns.
Diversification under the portfolio is generally done on the basis of class of
securities – equity or debt, maturity of bonds, selecting different industries.
Both investment and speculation have to be done at portfolio level. Harry
Markowitz proposed modern portfolio analysis. During the 1950s, Harry Markowitz, a
trained mathematician, first developed the theories that form the basis of modern
portfolio theory. Modern portfolio theory (MPT) approaches investing by examining the
entire market and the whole economy to make each investment opportunity unique in
term of the expected long-term return rate and their expected short-term volatility. MPT
is a theory that attempts to maximize portfolio expected return for a given amount of
4
portfolio risk, or equivalently minimize risk for a given level of expected return by
carefully choosing the proportions of various assets.
The founders of MPT received a Nobel Prize for revealing these four tenets.
Markets process information so rapidly when determining security prices, that it is
extremely difficult to gain a competitive edge by taking advantage of market
anomalies or inefficiencies.
Over time, riskier investments provide higher returns as compensation to
investors for accepting greater risk.
Adding high-risk, low correlating asset classes to a portfolio can actually reduce
volatility and increase expected rates of return.
Passive asset class fund portfolios can be designed to deliver over time the highest
expected returns for a chosen level of risk.
MPT is a mathematical formulation of the concept of diversification in investing
with the aim of selecting a collection of investment assets that has collectively lower risk
than any individual asset. MPT models an asset's return as a normally
distributed function. The probability distribution of return on security can be described by
expected value and variance (standard deviation). Expected value represents return;
variance represents the risk, a portfolio as a weighted combination of assets, so that the
return of a portfolio is the weighted combination of the assets' returns. By combining
different assets whose returns are not perfectly positively correlated, MPT seeks to
reduce the total variance of the portfolio return.
5
Two important aspects of MPT are the efficient frontier and portfolio betas.
Markowitz developed mathematical procedures for finding the set of portfolios that have
increasing expected return or increasing risk levels. This set of portfolios from which an
investor can choose a portfolio is called efficient frontier. In order to compare investment
options, Markowitz developed a system to describe each investment or each asset class
with math, using unsystematic risk statistics. Then he further applied to the portfolios that
contain the investment options. He looked at the expected rate of return and the expected
volatility for each investment.
EFFICIENT FRONTIER: A set of optimal portfolios that offers the highest expected
return for a defined level of risk or the lowest risk for a given level of expected return.
The portfolio with the lowest possible variance is called minimum variance portfolio.
This mean the portfolio must have the lowest possible standard deviation and thus lowest
risk. For a given amount of risk, MPT describes how to select a portfolio with the highest
possible expected return. Or, for a given expected return, MPT explains how to select a
portfolio with the lowest possible risk. The degree of curvature or bend of the efficient set
for portfolio reflects the diversification effect. The lower the correlation between the
securities the more the curve bend. In other word, the diversification effect rises as
correlation declines.
6
CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL (CAPM): The CAPM was introduced by Jack
Treynor (1961, 1962), William Sharpe (1964), John Lintner (1965a,b) and Jan
Mossin (1966) independently, building on the earlier work of Harry
Markowitzon diversification and modern portfolio theory. It is a model that describes the
relationship between risk and expected return and that is used in the pricing of risky
securities. A risky investment should offer a return that exceeds what investors can earn
on a risk-free investment. The CAPM says that the expected return on a risky asset equals
the risk-free rate plus a risk premium and the risk premium depends on how much of the
asset’s risk is un-diversifiable.
Where…
rj = the required return on investment j, given its risk as measured by beta
rrf = the risk-free rate of return; the return that can be earned on a risk-free investment
bj = beta coefficient, or index of non-diversifiable risk for investment j
rm =the expected market return; the average return on all securities.
Total risk = non-diversifiable risk + diversifiable risk
The risk of an investment consists of two components: diversifiable and non-
diversifiable risk. Diversifiable risk sometimes called unsystematic risk, results from
factors that are firm-specific. Unsystematic risk is the portion of an investment’s risk that
can be eliminated through diversification. Non-diversifiable risk, also called systematic
7
E( R i)=R f +β i( E( Rm )−R f )
risk or market risk, is the risk that remains even if a portfolio is well-diversified. A
careful investor can reduce or virtually eliminate diversifiable risk by holding a
diversified portfolio of securities. Investors can eliminate most diversifiable risk by
selecting a portfolio of as few 8 to 15 securities.
CAPM links an investment’s beta to its return. A security’s beta indicated how the
securities return responds to fluctuations in market returns. The more sensitive the return
of a security is to changes in market returns, the higher that security’s beta. For stocks
with positive betas, increase in market returns result in increase in security returns.
Stocks that have betas less than 1.0 are, of course, less responsive to changing returns in
the market and therefore less risky.
Beta Comment Interpretation
2.0 Twice as responsive as the market
1.0 Move in same direction as the market Same response as the market
0.5 One half as responsive as the market
0.0 Unaffected by market movement
-0.5 One-half as responsive as the market
-1.0 Move in opposite direction of the market Same response as the market
-2.0 Twice as responsive as the market
When CAPM depicted graphically, it is called security market line (SML). For
each level of non-diversifiable risk (beta), SML reflects the required return the investor
should earn in the marketplace.
8
The x-axis represents the risk (beta), and the y-axis represents the expected return.
The market risk premium is determined from the slope of the SML. The intercept is the
nominal risk-free rate available for the market, while the slope is the market premium,
E(Rm)− Rf. The securities market line can be regarded as representing a single-factor
model of the asset price, where Beta is exposure to changes in value of the Market. The
equation of the SML is thus:
For individual securities, we make use of the security market line (SML) and its
relation to expected return and systematic risk (beta) to show how the market must price
individual securities in relation to their security risk class. The SML enables us to
calculate the reward-to-risk ratio for any security in relation to that of the overall market.
Therefore, when the expected rate of return for any security is deflated by its beta
coefficient, the reward-to-risk ratio for any individual security in the market is equal to
the market reward-to-risk ratio, thus:
9
E( R i)=R f +β i( E( Rm )−R f )
E( Ri)−Rf
β i=E (Rm )−Rf
It is a useful tool in determining if an asset being considered for a portfolio offers
a reasonable expected return for risk. If the security's expected return versus risk is
plotted above the SML, it is undervalued since the investor can expect a greater return for
the inherent risk. And a security plotted below the SML is overvalued since the investor
would be accepting less return for the amount of risk assumed.
10
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY (MPT): A theory explained on how risk-adverse
investors can construct portfolios to optimize or maximize their expected return based on
a given level of market risk, emphasizing that risk is an inherent part of higher reward.
According to the theory, it’s possible to construct an “efficient frontier” of optimal
portfolios offering the maximum possible expected return for a given level of risk.
(Investopedia, 2013)
DATA COLLECTION: Firstly, we choose 10 companies from different sectors from
the main board of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. Next, we gather relevant information
such as weekly stock prices and weekly KLCI price for year 2007 till year 2011 from
datastream and exported the information to Microsoft Excel Worksheet.
11
FORMULA USED IN THIS ARTICLE:
(i) Expected Return - It is the amount that one would anticipate receiving on an
investment that has various known or expected rates of return. The formula is
as shown below:
E ( RP )=∑i
wi(E) Ri
Where…
- Rp is the return of portfolio
- w i is weight of the asset i in the portfolio and
- Ri is the return of an asset i in the portfolio.
(ii) Variance - It is represents by σ 2 which is the measure of dispersion.
σ 2=∑i=1
n
(k t−k t)2
n−1
Where…
- k t is for the past rate of return of time t
- k̄ t is for the average rate of return
- n is for number of year.
12
To determine the riskiness of a portfolio which consists of two assets:
Variance of portfolioAB:
σ p=x2σ A2 +(1−x )2σ B
2 +2 x(1−x )r AB σ A σ B
Where…
- x is the fraction of portfolio invested in asset A
To determine the riskiness of a portfolio which consists of three assets:
Variance of portfolioABC:
σ2
p=wA2 σ A
2 +wB2 σ B
2 +2 wA wB Cov ( AB )+wC2 σC
2 +2 wA wC Cov ( AC )
+2 wB wC Cov( BC )
Or in Matrix Form: σ 2p=w t vw
Where…
- W = Weight
- V = Covariance Matrix
To make things easier to understand in three-asset case, x is converted to w,
which denotes weight or proportion of the portfolio allocated to each asset.
See also: r AB σ A σ ⇒COV ( A , B )
13
(iii) Standard Deviation - It is represents by σ which is used to measure the
investment’s volatility. It is also known as historical volatility and is used by
investors as a gauge for the amount of expected volatility.
σ=√∑i=1
n
(k t−k t)2
n−1@√σ2
Where…
- k t is for the past rate of return of time t
- k̄ t is for the average rate of return
- n is for number of year.
(iv) Covariance, Cov - It is refers to the measure of the degree to which returns
on two risky assets move in tandem. A positive covariance means that asset
returns move together. A negative covariance means returns move inversely.
Cov ( AB )=∑i=1
n
(k A,i−k A ) ( kB ,i−k B )
n−1
Or in Matrix Form:
Cov ( A , B )= 1n−1
XrT Xr
Where…
- Xr is refers to excess return
- n is refers to number of sample
14
(v) Correlation Coefficient, r - It is a statistical measure of how two securities
move in relation to each other which are used in advanced portfolio
management and ranges between -1 and +1. Perfect positive correlation, a
correlation coefficient of +1 implies that as one security moves, either up or
down, the other security will move in lockstep, in the same direction. In
contrast, perfect negative correlation, a correlation coefficient of -1 implies
that if one security moves, either up or down, the other security that is
perfectly negatively correlated will move in the opposite direction. If the
correlation coefficient is 0, they are completely moves randomly. In real life,
perfectly correlated securities are rare where most securities have some degree
of correlation. The formula for correlation coefficient is as below:
r AB=Cov ( AB )
σ A ∙σ B
(vi) Beta, β - Beta of a stock or portfolio is to describe how the return of the stock
or portfolio is predicted by a benchmark. Generally, the benchmark is refers to
the overall financial market and is often estimated via the use of representative
indices, such as KLCI indices. In Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), Beta
is used to measure the volatility or systematic risk of a security or a portfolio
in comparison to the market as a whole.
#1 β i=Cov ( i , M )
σ M2 or #2 β i=
ri , M σ i σ M
σ M2 or #3 β i=
ri ,M σ i
σ M
15
Table below shows the summary of interpretation of Beta. As we mentioned before,
we have to compute Beta for 10 assets, thus we utilize the covariance matrix to
compute Beta where formula #1 is used in the article.
Value of Beta Interpretation
β < 0 Asset generally moves in the opposite direction as compared to the index
β = 0 Movement of the asset is uncorrelated with the movement of the benchmark
0 < β < 1Movement of the asset is generally in the same direction as, but less than the
movement of the benchmark
β = 1Movement of the asset is generally in the same direction as, and about the same
amount as the movement of the benchmark
β > 1Movement of the asset is generally in the same direction as, but more than the
movement of the benchmark
16
17
DATA COMPUTATION: First, we copy the entire stock price for the 10 chosen
companies to a worksheet namely KLCI. Then, we rename the date of each stock price
taken to number from 0 to 521. Next, we compute the stock return for every company by
usingRCS=log
P1
P0 , where P1
= Stock Price at current term and P0
= Stock Price at
previous term. However, in Excel, the natural logarithm function is used. For example, to
compute the first term of stock return for Malaysia Pacific, we used the formula
=LN(C5/C4), where C5 is the current stock price and C4 is the previous stock price. We
did the same for the other 9 assets and also for KLCI price index. Next, we compute the
Stock Excess Return by using a simple formula where Excess Return=r−r , where r =
Actual Stock Return and r = Expected Stock Return). For example, the stock excess
return of Malaysia Pacific is represented by =N5:N525-AVERAGE(N5:N525) where
N5:N525 represents the values of Stock Return and AVERAGE(N5:N525) represents the
average values of Stock Return (which is the expected return of a stock). The same
formula applies to the rest too. Then, we named the entire Stock Excess Return as E_R
for the further computation use.
Now, we are going to compute a Covariance Matrix. To compute the Covariance Matrix,
we simply use the Matrix Multiplication function in Excel, where the function will be
=(MMULT(TRANSPOSE(RET),RET))/521. * Note: we have to press Ctrl + Shift +
Enter for matrix form.
18
COVARIANCE MATRIX
FTSE BURSA
MALAYSIA KLCI - PRICE INDEX (~M$)
MALAYSIA PACIFIC (~M$)
UNISEM (M)
KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG
(~M$)
KULIM (M’SIA) (~M$)
HUP SENG IND
(~M$)
ORIENTAL HOLD. (~M$)
MUHIBBAH ENG. (M)
(~M$)
EKOVEST (~M$)
YINSON HOLDIN
GS (~M$)
BORNEO OIL (~M$)
FTSE BURSA MALAYSIA
KLCI - PRICE INDEX (~M$)
=(MMULT(TRANSPOSE(RET),RET))/521
MALAYSIA PACIFIC (~M$)
UNISEM (M)
KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG
(~M$)
KULIM (MALAYSIA)
(~M$)
HUP SENG INDUSTRIES
(~M$)
ORIENTAL HOLDINGS
(~M$)
MUHIBBAH ENGINEERING
(M) (~M$)
EKOVEST (~M$)
YINSON HOLDINGS
(~M$)
BORNEO OIL (~M$)
Table 3.1: Draft of Covariance Matrix
19
To compute Beta by using the formula, β=Cov( i , m)
σ m2 . Next, we formed another
table with the relevant information such as, Beta, Variance and Standard Deviation,
Covariance between stock and market, and also Correlation Coefficient. Standard
Deviation is the square root product of Variance of the respective stock and Correlation
Coefficient (r AB=
Cov( AB)σ A . σ B ) is the product of Covariance between stock and market
divided by the multiplication of Standard Deviation of stock and Standard Deviation of
market.
To proceed, we have to form a table concluding weightage of the stock, Variance,
Stock Annual Return, and also the Portfolio Return as shown in Table 3.1. To form an
investment portfolio, there are two (2) conditions: (a) Short Selling is allowed, (b) Short
Selling is not allowed. Besides, we need to use the Solver Function in Excel. Solver
Function is part of a suite of commands sometimes called what-if-analysis which helps to
find an optimal value for a formula in one cell (called the target cell) on a worksheet.
Solver works with a group of cells that are related, either directly or indirectly, to the
formula in the target cell. It will adjusts the values in the changing cells that we specified
(called the adjustable cell) to produce the result that we specify from the target cell
formula. Thus, to use the Solver Function, we need to generate Table 3.2 first.
20
ASSET WEIGHTAGE VARIANCE RETURN RETURNPF
MALAYSIA PACIFIC 0.10 0.00707476 -0.05572494 -0.0053572494
UNISEM (M) 0.10 0.00627582 -0.08490298 -0.0084950298
KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG 0.10 0.00129728 0.18507246 0.0185047246
KULIM (MALAYSIA) 0.10 0.00250902 0.20096830 0.0250096830
HUP SENG INDUSTRIES 0.10 0.00090901 0.06688487 0.0066288487
ORIENTAL HOLDINGS 0.10 0.00757104 0.05176927 0.0051769297
MUHIBBAH ENGINEERING (M) 0.10 0.04610 9261 0.011582610
EKOVEST 0.100.00379487
40.006461940 0.0006461940
YINSON HOLDINGS 0.100.00295766
10.127550033 0.0127550033
BORNEO OIL 0.100.01107301
7-0.13478562 -0.0134785620
TOTAL 1.00
RETURNPF
VARIANCEPF
STANDARD DEVIATIONPF
Table 3.2: Format of Individual Stock and Portfolio’s Weightage, Variance, Return
for 10 Stocks
21
Solver Function: We named the Weightage of Stock as W_PF and Covariance Matrix as
CV_PF. Next, copy the values of Variance from the Covariance Matrix. Return of
individual stock is computed by =N5:N525-AVERAGE(N5:N525)*52, where N5:N525
represents the values of Stock Annual Return.
There are 2 steps needed to compute Portfolio’s Return. First, use the formula =
AK32*AM32 where AK32 is the Weightage of the Stock and AM32 is the Return of the
respective Stock. Second, sum up all the values computed. Variance of Portfolio will be
computed by using the formula
=(MMULT(MMULT(TRANSPOSE(WD_MIN),CV_PF),WD_MIN)), where MMULT
refers to Matrix Multiplication, Transpose refers to returns a vertical range of cells as a
horizontal range, or vice versa, WD_MIN is the Name of all weightage for 10 assets, and
lastly CV_PF is Covariance of the 10 individual assets respondent to the market which is
KLCI, whereas Standard Deviation of Portfolio will be the product of square root of
Variance of Portfolio.
22
SHORT SELLING ALLOWED
VARIANCE RETURN
0.000401356 Optimal +0.002
0.000400994 Optimal +0.001
Minimum Value
0.000400993 Optimal -0.001
0.000401356 Optimal -0.002
Table 3.3: Format of Data to compute Investment Portfolio Table
[Short Selling is allowed] To complete the Investment Portfolio Table with Optimum
-0.002, Optimum -0.001, Minimum, Optimum +0.001, and Optimum +0.002, we need to
use the Excel Solver function as shown in Figure 3.1. To proceed, we have to compute
for the minimum value as below.
i. Set Objective - Set Variance of Portfolio as the target cell to the Min. Value.
ii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage of
each stock).
iii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1. (Note:
For short selling is allowed, uncheck the column for Make Unconstrained
Variables Non-Negative)
iv. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling Allowed table (as shown in Table
3.4) and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.6).
23
Figure 3.1: Print Screen of Solver Function (MIN Value) where Short Selling is
Allowed
24
[Short Selling is Not Allowed] To complete the Investment Portfolio Table with
Optimum -0.002, Optimum -0.001, Minimum, Optimum +0.001, and Optimum +0.002,
we need to use the Excel Solver function as shown in Figure 3.2. To proceed, we have to
compute for the minimum value as below.
i. Set Objective - Set Variance of Portfolio as the target cell to the Min. Value.
ii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage of
each stock).
iii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1. (Note:
For short selling is not allowed, check the column for Make Unconstrained
Variables Non-Negative)
iv. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling is Not Allowed table (as shown in
Table 3.5) and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.7).
25
Figure 3.2: Print Screen of Solver Function (MIN Value) where Short Selling is not
Allowed
26
SHORT SELLING ALLOWED
VARIANCE RETURN
-0.0645982630 = AU57+0.002
-0.0655982630 = AU57+0.001
AT57 0.0004039307 -0.0665982630 AU57
-0.0675982630 = AU57-0.001
-0.0685982630 = AU57-0.002
Table 3.4: Partial Summary of Variance and Return of Portfolio where Short
Selling is Allowed
Table 3.4 shows the partial summary of Variance and return of investment portfolio
which consists of 10 companies where short selling is allowed. The cell AT57 and AU57
is the minimum value obtained from Solver solution. It is the minimum return will gain
from the portfolio associated with the lowest risk.
27
SHORT SELLING N/A
VARIANCE RETURN
-0.057725455 = BE57+0.002
-0.058725455 = BE57+0.001
BD57 0.000414638 -0.059725455 BE57
-0.060725455 = BE57-0.001
-0.061725455 = BE57-0.002
Table 3.5: Partial Summary of Variance and Return of Portfolio where Short
Selling is not Allowed
Table 3.5 shows the partial summary of Variance and return of investment portfolio
which consists of 10 companies where short selling is not allowed. The cell BD57 and
BE57 is the minimum value obtained from Solver solution for the case Short Selling is
not allowed. It is the minimum return will gain from the portfolio associated with the
lowest risk when there is no short selling
.
28
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO WHERE SHORT SELLING IS ALLOWED
ASSETOPTIMUM
-0.002
OPTIMU
M -0.001MINIMUM
OPTIMUM
+0.001
OPTIMUM
+0.002
MALAYSIA PACIFIC 0.010
UNISEM (M) -0.037
KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG 0.154
KULIM (MALAYSIA) 0.020
HUP SENG INDUSTRIES 0.379
ORIENTAL HOLDINGS 0.387
MUHIBBAH ENGINEERING (M) -0.031
EKOVEST 0.044
YINSON HOLDINGS 0.085
BORNEO OIL -0.010
TOTAL 1.000
RETURNPF -0.0665982630
VARIANCEPF 0.0004039307
STANDARD DEVIATIONPF 0.0200980265
Table 3.6: Partial of Investment Portfolio Table where Short Selling is Allowed
29
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO WHERE SHORT SELLING IS NOT ALLOWED
ASSETOPTIMUM
-0.002
OPTIMU
M -0.001MINIMUM
OPTIMUM
+0.001
OPTIMUM
+0.002
MALAYSIA PACIFIC 0.002
UNISEM (M) 0.000
KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG 0.140
KULIM (MALAYSIA) 0.012
HUP SENG INDUSTRIES 0.366
ORIENTAL HOLDINGS 0.375
MUHIBBAH ENGINEERING (M) 0.000
EKOVEST 0.026
YINSON HOLDINGS 0.079
BORNEO OIL 0.000
TOTAL 1.000
RETURNPF -0.0587263340
VARIANCEPF 0.0004158953
STANDARD DEVIATIONPF 0.0203935103
Table 3.7: Partial of Investment Portfolio Table where Short Selling is not Allowed
30
[Short Selling is Allowed] To complete Table 3.4, Table 3.5, Table 3.6 and Table 3.7,
we are also using the Solver Function with different target cell as shown in Figure 3.3.
The steps are as shown below:
i. Set Objective - Set Return of Portfolio as the target cell to the Value of
*.
- * refers to the value of return from the respective cell in Table 3.4.
ii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage of
each stock).
iii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1. (Note:
For short selling is allowed, uncheck the column for Make Unconstrained
Variables Non-Negative)
iv. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling Allowed table (as shown in Table
3.4) and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.6).
v. Repeat Steps (i) to (iv) for the column of Optimal +0.002, Optimal +0.001,
Optimal -0.001, and also Optimal -0.002.
31
Figure 3.3: Print Screen of Solver Function (OPTIMAL Value) where Short Selling
is Allowed
32
SHORT SELLING ALLOWED
VARIANCE RETURN
-0.0645982630
-0.0655982630
0.0004039307 -0.0665982630
-0.0675982630
-0.0685982630
Table 3.8: Summary of Variance and Return of Portfolio where Short Selling is
Allowed
33
[Short Selling is Not Allowed] To complete Table 3.4, Table 3.5, Table 3.6 and Table 3.7, we are also using the Solver Function with different target cell as shown in Figure 3.4. The steps are as shown below:
vi. Set Objective - Set Return of Portfolio as the target cell to the Value of
*.
- * refers to the value of return from the respective cell in Table 3.5.
vii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage of
each stock).
viii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1. (Note:
For short selling is allowed, uncheck the column for Make Unconstrained
Variables Non-Negative)
ix. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling Allowed table (as shown in Table
3.5) and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.7).
x. Repeat Steps (i) to (iv) for the column of Optimal +0.002, Optimal +0.001,
Optimal -0.001, and also Optimal -0.002.
34
Figure 3.4: Print Screen of Solver Function (OPTIMAL Value) where Short Selling
is not Allowed
35
SHORT SELLING N/A
VARIANCE RETURN
0.0004164181 -0.0577254551
0.0004158947 -0.0587254551
0.0004146381 -0.0597254551
0.0004150221 -0.0607254551
0.0004148999 -0.0617254551
Table 3.9: Summary of Variance and Return of Portfolio where Short Selling is not
Allowed
36
PEARSON CORRELATION COEFFICIENT: Refers to the measurement of how
well the variables are related.
Pearson's Correlation Coefficient, r Interpretation
r = +0.70 or higher Very Strong Positive Relationship
+0.40 ≤ r ≤ +0.69 Strong Positive Relationship
+0.30 ≤ r ≤ +0.39 Moderate Positive Relationship
+0.20 ≤ r ≤ +0.29 Weak Positive Relationship
+0.01 ≤ r ≤ +0.19 No or Negligible Relationship
-0.01 ≤ r ≤ -0.19 No or Negligible Relationship
-0.20 ≤ r ≤ -0.29 Weak Negative Relationship
-0.30 ≤ r ≤ -0.39 Moderate Negative Relationship
-0.40 ≤ r ≤ -0.69 Strong Negative Relationship
r = -0.70 or higher Very Strong Negative Relationship
To compute, we simply used the Excel built-in function, CORREL, which is to returns the
correlation coefficient of the array1 and array2 cell ranges. For example, to compute the
correlation coefficient of stock return between KLCI and Malaysia Pacific, we used
=CORREL(A5:A525,B5:B525), where A5:A525 is the values of stock return of KLCI
and B5:B525 is the values of stock return of Malaysia Pacific.
37
38
Table 3.9.1: Draft of Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient
CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND RESULTS
39
40
Table 4.1: Covariance Matrix
Beta of market is always equals to 1 and individual stocks are ranked according to
how much they deviate from the market. A stock that is more volatile than the market
over time has a beta above 1.0 whereas a stock that is less volatile than the market has a
beta which is less than 1.0. High beta stocks are supposed to be riskier buy provide a
potential for higher return. In contrast, stocks with low beta exposed to lower risk but
also lower returns.
Technology sector, plantation sector and construction sector have positive beta
and the value of beta is more than 1. This shows that the companies in these sectors are
expected to change by more than 1 percent in the same direction by market. The
companies are Malaysian Pacific Industries Bhd, Unisem (M) Bhd, Kuala Lumpur
Kepong Bhd, Kulim (Malaysia) Bhd, Muhibbah Engineering (M) Bhd and Ekovest Bhd.
Among these companies, Unisem (M) Bhd and Muhibbah Engineering (M) Bhd have the
highest beta which is 1.59 in value. This indicates that both companies are 59% more
volatile than the market.
Next, let’s proceed to the consumer products companies - Hup Seng Industries
Bhd and Oriental Holdings Berhad. Both companies has beta which greater than zero but
less than 1. This indicates that returns of companies are generally in the same direction
with market, but less than the movement of the benchmark. Consumer products
companies mostly less volatile than the market. This is because demand for consumer
product such as clothing, food, and automobiles are stable and less affected by the
economic condition. Thus, even during economic downturn, consumer will still demand
for these products as products such as food and clothing are basic need of human-being.
41
Lastly, trading or services sectors - Yinson Holdings Berhad and Borneo Oil
Berhad. Yinson Holdings has beta which greater than zero but less than 1. Unlike Borneo
Oil, Yinson is not too much affected by the market. Borneo Oil has highest beta, which is
1.97. In other words, Borneo Oil is double as responsive the market.
From the Table 4.1, we are also found that all the variables move together in same
direction. FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI comprises the 30 largest companies listed on the
Malaysian Main Market by full market capitalization that meet the eligibility
requirements of the FTSE Bursa Malaysia Index Ground Rules. Thus, the data in the
table shows that the 10 assets in our portfolio have a positive relationship with the largest
30 companies which is represented by the price index. Among 10 companies we have
been invested, Borneo Oil Berhad is the company which is able to react quickly with
market and can earn more return when the return of market increases. However, it is also
brings greater loss if the market become worst. Hup Seng Industries Bhd is more
independent with the trend of market, it is only has covariance matrix of 0.0001400767.
Normally companies in same sector will face same market risk and challenges.
For Malaysian Pacific, return of the asset move positive with market which has
covariance matrix is 0.0005532323. It is also generate high return whenever return of
other assets is high. The highest covariance matrix of Malaysian Pacific is 0.0018557480.
This is shows Malaysian Pacific is able to get higher return if return of Borneo Oil
increases. For Unisem, it is also shows positive relationship with market return and other
asset return. When the market return increases 1%, return of Unisem will increases by
0.07%. It is also has highest covariance matrix with Borneo Oil, 0.0021290632. Both of
42
business of Malaysian Pacific and Unisem shows weak relationship with Hup Seng
Industries.
For companies in plantation sector; Kuala Lumpur Kepong and Kulim, both
companies have nearly covariance matrix with market, these are 0.0004556918 and
0.0005354185. For Kuala Lumpur Kepong has highest covariance matrix with Borneo
Oil, that is 0.0009785125. Kulim has highest positive relationship with Muhibbah
Engineering, which is 0.0010413557. Both of companies from sector plantation have
lowest covariance matrix with Hup Seng Industries.
Hup Seng Industries and Oriental Holdings are based on consumer products
sector. Hup Seng Industries is produce daily foodstuff. This is the reason it is slightly
affect by the unfavorable market situation. It is only has covariance matrix of
0.0001400767 with market. It is has lower covariance matrix with others companies, such
as Muhibbah Engineering and Ekovest. For Oriental Holdings, it is has slightly positive
relationship with market, covariance matrix of 0.0003113934.
Muhibbah Engineering and Ekovest both have slight relationship with market,
these are 0.0006985672 and 0.0005372219. This is due to it is based on construction
sector, and this sector will always affected by government’s policies. Both of it has
highest covariance matrix with each other, that is 0.0015642546. This is due to it is from
same sector.
For trading and services sector, Yinson Holdings has slightly relationship with
market, it is only has covariance matrix of 0.0002249608. It is also has slightly
relationship with others company. Covariance matrix of Yinson Holdings with others
43
companies are not more than 0.0006. For Borneo Oil, it is more affected by sector of
construction because it has some investment that related to construction sector.
In conclusion, the 10 assets have positive relationship with each other and also
market. Thus, if one asset drops or increases, other assets will also being affected with
different degree of positive effect.
44
ASSET BETA VARIANCESTANDARD
DEVIATION
COVARIANCE
(STOCK VS
MARKET)
CORRELATION
COEFFICIENT
(STOCK VS
MARKET)
FTSE BURSA
MALAYSIA KLCI -
PRICE INDEX (~M$)
1 0.000438468 0.020939622 0.000438468 1
MALAYSIA PACIFIC
(~M$)1.261739886 0.007075848 0.084118057 0.000553232 0.31408662
UNISEM (M) 1.594774102 0.003630250 0.060251560 0.000699257 0.55424236
KUALA LUMPUR
KEPONG (~M$)1.039282392 0.001309912 0.036192704 0.000455692 0.60128639
KULIM (MALAYSIA)
(~M$)1.221112592 0.002531034 0.050309380 0.000535419 0.508247885
HUP SENG
INDUSTRIES (~M$)0.319468546 0.000910642 0.030176847 0.000140077 0.221678249
ORIENTAL
HOLDINGS (~M$)0.710185352 0.000758096 0.027533534 0.000311393 0.54010548
MUHIBBAH
ENGINEERING (M)
(~M$)
1.593200896 0.004624776 0.068005706 0.000698567 0.490562136
EKOVEST (~M$) 1.225225464 0.003794890 0.061602676 0.000537222 0.416471484
YINSON HOLDINGS
(~M$)0.513061189 0.002963677 0.054439668 0.000224961 0.197343366
BORNEO OIL (~M$) 1.973321375 0.011079736 0.105260324 0.000865238 0.392556304
Table 4.2: Summary of Beta, Variance, Standard Deviation, Covariance between
Assets and Market, and Correlation Coefficient
45
For individual stock, Malaysian Pacific and Unisem have a good performance in
these 10 years. The variance of Malaysian Pacific and Unisem are high; these are 0.071%
and 0.36%. The standard deviation of Malaysian Pacific and Unisem are high: 8.41% and
6.02%. This is due to both of the company are based technology sector. Technology
sector always faced volatile. New technology is develops rapid in recent years. It is a
challenge for company and price of stock company will fluctuate. Income of company
also always affected if company is unable to react quickly on the trend of market. Both of
the companies enhance its’ management and able to compete with others. It is able to get
high return to investor. We find that return of Malaysian Pacific and Unisem are 12.11%
and 15.6%.
In recent decade, plantation sector has faced challenges. The community price
always fluctuated. Climate is also always changed. Kuala Lumpur Kepong and Kulim are
companies based on plantation. We find that variance for Kuala Lumpur Kepong and
Kulim are 0.13% and 0.25%, standard deviation for Kuala Lumpur Kepong and Kulim
are 3.61% and 5%. Although the risk is high, return for both companies are negative;
these are -19.4% and -20.4%. This phenomenon is unmatched with theory Risk Return
Trade Off, high risk associated with potentially high return. This is normally due to
geopolitical event happen such as economic factor. As mention before, company need
face many challenges. This is the reason why the companies’ performance also volatiles.
Companies which product consumer product normally face lower risk. Hup Seng
Industries has 0.09% of variance and 3% of standard deviation. Oriental Holdings has
0.08% of variance and 2.75% of standard deviation. Both of the companies have lowest
risk in this portfolio. This is due to people will buy the consumer products although the
46
economic recession happens. According to the theory Risk Return Trade Off, we are able
to expect the returns of both companies are low. However, both of companies’
performances are unsatisfied, because it is generate negative return to us. Hup Seng
Industries generated -2.7% of return. Oriental Holdings has -5.7% of return. Hup Seng
Industries produces biscuit product. It faced challenges because people have many
choices instead of biscuits. They are preferred bread or instant noodles, because it is more
convenient. Therefore, sales of the Hup Seng Industries have affected. For Oriental
Holdings, it is do diversified investment. It is expand the business segments to 7 parts;
these are automotive, hotels and resorts, plastic products, plantation, investment holding
and financial services, property development and healthcare. Because of expanded
business, the performance of the company is unstable and the price of stock becomes
volatile.
For construction sector, it is develop in this decade. This is due to markets in this
industry are increasing according to the development at Malaysia. Moreover, construction
companies in Malaysia are also looking forward to the world market. We know that the
risk of company in construction sector is high. This is due to the project of company
normally is costing. For Ekovest, it is reacts quickly in trend of market. It is faced high
risk with 0.37% of variance and 6.16% of standard deviation. But, it is generated 17% of
return. We also can say the successful of Ekovest is not only depends of the trend of
market, it is also due to the good internal control of company. This is on account of
Ekovest do well than others construction companies, such as Muhibbah Engineering.
Muhibbah Engineering is a high risk investment too (0.46% of variance and 6.8% of
47
standard deviation), but it is only generate -4.8% of return. This is due to the price of
materials increases sharply and the competition becomes more intense.
For trading or services sector, it is also high risk investment. For Yinson
Holdings, it is has 0.3% of variance and 6.16% of standard deviation. Although risk is
high, it is unable to generate satisfy return. It is generate -4% of return. This is due to this
sector easy influenced by technologies and research and development efforts. Yinson
Holdings is unable to face highly competitive in this sector. However, for Borneo Oil, it
is shows it talent in company’s management. It is able to integrate its core activities with
advances in technology in order to remain relevant and competitive. It is also operates in
four segments, such as restaurant, franchising and head office operations segment,
general trading segment, management and operations of properties segment, and oil, gas
and energy related business segment. It is achieve excellent result in these four segments
and bring 10.5% of return.
48
ASSET WEIGHTAGE VARIANCEANNUAL
RETURNRETURNPF
MALAYSIA PACIFIC 0.100.00707584
80.121051714 0.012105171
UNISEM (M) 0.100.00363025
00.155857045 0.015585705
KUALA LUMPUR
KEPONG0.10
0.00130991
2-0.194431646 -0.019443165
KULIM (MALAYSIA) 0.100.00253103
4-0.204840239 -0.020484024
HUP SENG INDUSTRIES 0.100.00091064
2-0.027067773 -0.002706777
ORIENTAL HOLDINGS 0.100.00075809
6-0.057151612 -0.005715161
MUHIBBAH
ENGINEERING (M)0.10
0.00462477
6-0.048197099 -0.004819710
EKOVEST 0.100.00379489
00.170579665 0.017057966
YINSON HOLDINGS 0.100.00296367
7-0.042027860 -0.004202786
BORNEO OIL 0.100.01107973
60.105153822 0.010515382
TOTAL 1.00
RETURNPF -0.0021073983
49
VARIANCEPF 0.0010777925
STANDARD DEVIATIONPF 0.0328297508
Table 4.3: Summary of Individual Stock and Portfolio’s Weightage, Variance,
Return for 10 Assets (If every stocks is invested equally)
50
If we equally invested in the 10 assets, we can find that the return of the portfolio
is -0.21% where 0.11% of portfolio variance and 3.28% of standard deviation. Through
the diversification, we can balance out each asset and can get a well-rounded portfolio
with ability of recovering from market setbacks and limit the losses. We can say the loss
from Kuala Lumpur Kepong, Kulim, Hup Seng Industries, Oriental Holdings, Muhibbah
Engineering and Yinson Holdings can be offset with the high return asset. It is also
stabilize the risks of companies which are always faced volatile.
51
Investing with equal weightage of asset might not a best portfolio. Therefore, we
look at the other alternatives; these are with short selling and without short selling.
SHORT SELLING ALLOWED
VARIANCE RETURN
0.0004043 -0.0645983
0.0004040 -0.0655983
0.0004039 -0.0665983
0.0004040 -0.0675983
0.0004043 -0.0685983
Table 4.4: Summary of Data to graph Scatter Bar if Short Selling is Allowed
52
0.0004039 0.0004040 0.0004041 0.0004042 0.0004043 0.0004044
-0.0690000
-0.0680000
-0.0670000
-0.0660000
-0.0650000
-0.0640000
-0.0630000
-0.0620000
EFFICIENT FRONTIER WHERE SHORT SELLING IS ALLOWED
VARIANCE (RISK ASSOCIATED)
RETU
RN
Figure 4.1: Efficient Frontier where Short Selling is Allowed
In the case where short selling is allowed, we found that the portfolio variance has
decreased compared to the equally invested portfolio. The portfolio variances become
0.04039%, 0.04040% and 0.04043%. Since the variance is decrease, this is means the
risk an investor might take is also decrease. A smaller variance indicates the numbers in
the set are close from the mean. The standard deviation is also decrease if compared to
the portfolio which consists of 10 equally invested stocks. The standard deviation has
decreased to 2.0% compared with 3.28% for the equally invested portfolio. We can
conclude that the risk of investment portfolio where short selling is allowed is lower than
the portfolio which gives 0.1 of weightage to each asset. Since the risk is lower, the
return also decreases. The return for the investment portfolio where short selling is
allowed is around -6.6%.
Through the graph, we can found that a set represents the risk-return
combinations attainable with all possible portfolios. The portfolio which has 0.04039% of
variance, 2.009% of standard deviation and -6.66% of return is the optimal portfolio. It
represents the highest level of satisfaction we can achieve given the available set of
portfolio. The portfolio above the optimal portfolio is the efficient portfolio. However the
portfolio below the optimal portfolio is below the optimal portfolio is unsatisfactory, it is
due to higher risk we need accept, but lower potential return that we can get. We found
that the return of portfolio becomes lower. This is due to we are selling assets that are
borrowed in expectation of a fall in the assets’ price, such as Unisem and Muhibbah
Engineering. After that, we will buy an equivalent number of assets at the new lower
price and returns to the lender of the assets that were borrowed. However, this kind of the
53
stock actually generated high return to us. This caused portfolio returns to decrease
because of we cannot take advantages of the potential of stock in future. Thus, in the
optimal portfolio, Excel advised us to short sell some of the stocks, which are Unisem
(M), Muhibbah Engineering, and Borneo Oil to minimize the loss.
54
SHORT SELLING N/A
VARIANCE RETURN
0.0004164 -0.05773
0.0004159 -0.05873
0.0004146 -0.05973
0.0004150 -0.06073
0.0004149 -0.06173
Table 4.5: Summary of Data to graph Scatter Bar if Short Selling is not Allowed
Figure 4.2: Efficient Frontier where Short Selling is Allowed
55
0.0004145 0.0004150 0.0004155 0.0004160 0.0004165 0.0004170
-0.06300
-0.06200
-0.06100
-0.06000
-0.05900
-0.05800
-0.05700
-0.05600
-0.05500
EFFICIENT FRONTIER WHERE SHORT SELLING IS NOT ALLOWED
VARIANCE (RISK ASSOCIATED)
RETU
RN
In the case where short selling is not allowed, the shape of efficient frontier for
case where short selling is not allowed is not that smooth compared to the case where
short selling is allowed. We found that the portfolio variance is lower than the equally
weightage of portfolio, but it is higher than the portfolio with short selling. This indicates
that investment portfolio where short selling is not allowed is more risky than the
investment portfolio where short selling is allowed. The return of the portfolio without
short selling is higher than the equally weightage of portfolio, but it is lower than the
portfolio with short selling. This happens as we did not sell the stock even the price has
raised to the peak where other investors are selling their stocks. The aggressive selling of
stock will cause the stock price to drop and lastly leads to loss for us. The standard
deviation also lower than the equally weightage of portfolio, but it is higher than the
portfolio with short selling. This is due to it is hasn’t an opportunity to selling assets
which is expected fall in price.
56
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO WHERE SHORT SELLING IS ALLOWED
ASSET OPTIMUM -0.002 OPTIMUM -0.001 MINIMUM OPTIMUM +0.001 OPTIMUM +0.002
MALAYSIA PACIFIC 0.002 0.006 0.010 0.014 0.018
UNISEM (M) -0.038 -0.037 -0.037 -0.037 -0.037
KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG 0.156 0.155 0.154 0.153 0.152
KULIM (MALAYSIA) 0.022 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.018
HUP SENG INDUSTRIES 0.380 0.379 0.379 0.378 0.378
ORIENTAL HOLDINGS 0.388 0.387 0.387 0.386 0.386
MUHIBBAH ENGINEERING (M) -0.030 -0.030 -0.031 -0.032 -0.032
EKOVEST 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.045
YINSON HOLDINGS 0.086 0.086 0.085 0.085 0.084
BORNEO OIL -0.010 -0.010 -0.010 -0.010 -0.010
TOTAL 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
RETURNPF -0.0685982630 -0.0675992630 -0.0665982630 -0.0655982630 -0.0645972630
VARIANCEPF 0.0004043157 0.0004040272 0.0004039307 0.0004040268 0.0004043159
STANDARD DEVIATIONPF 0.0201076032 0.0201004266 0.0200980265 0.0201004189 0.0201076070
Table 4.6: Investment Portfolio where Short Selling is Allowed
57
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO WHERE SHORT SELLING IS NOT ALLOWED
ASSET OPTIMUM -0.002 OPTIMUM -0.001 MINIMUM OPTIMUM +0.001 OPTIMUM +0.002
MALAYSIA PACIFIC 0.00 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.00
UNISEM (M) 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00
KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG 0.14 0.140 0.140 0.133 0.13
KULIM (MALAYSIA) 0.01 0.014 0.012 0.013 0.01
HUP SENG INDUSTRIES 0.37 0.366 0.366 0.367 0.37
ORIENTAL HOLDINGS 0.37 0.375 0.375 0.376 0.38
MUHIBBAH ENGINEERING (M) 0.00 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.00
EKOVEST 0.02 0.024 0.026 0.027 0.03
YINSON HOLDINGS 0.08 0.079 0.079 0.080 0.08
BORNEO OIL 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.00
TOTAL 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00
RETURNPF -0.0617254551 -0.0607264551 -0.0597254551 -0.0587263340 -0.0577244551
VARIANCEPF 0.0004148999 0.0004150221 0.0004146381 0.0004158953 0.0004164181
STANDARD DEVIATIONPF 0.0203690930 0.0203720922 0.0203626636 0.0203935103 0.0204063243
Table 4.7: Investment Portfolio where Short Selling is not Allowed
Table 4.6 and Table 4.7 have shown the deviation of weightage for each stock
when the portfolio return changed by 0.001 positively or negatively.
58
59
Table 4.8: Pearson’s Correlation Table
We found that the correlation coefficient of FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI has
fairly positive with many sectors, these are plantation and construction. Unisem from
technology, Oriental Holdings from consumer product and Borneo Oil have fairly
positive relationship with FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI. It is has returns that move
together in the same direction and magnitude.
Hup Seng Industries and Yinson Holdings have very weak and positive
relationship with other companies. This is means it only increases or decreases a bit of
return when return of other companies is increase.
Malaysian Pacific has slightly positive relationship with some companies; these
are Unisem, Kuala Lumpur Kepong, Kulim, Muhibbah Engeering, Ekovest and Borneo
Oil. The return of Malaysian Pacific will increase mildly when the companies earn more
return to us.
Oriental Holdings and Muhibbah Engineering have the slightly positive with
Unisem, Kuala Lumpur Kepong and Kulim. Its relationship is stronger than relationship
between Malaysia Pacific and Unisem, Kuala Lumpur Kepong and Kulim. This is means
it is more affected by the performances of Unisem, Kuala Lumpur Kepong and Kulim.
60
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION
Throughout our analysis, we are facing loss from our investment. Although we
have invested in 10 companies from five different sectors, we are unable to get a greater
return from the portfolio. To prevent this situation becomes worst, we should diversify
the investment portfolio again.
We should not only invest in the asset which move positive with market. This is
due to when bear market happens, we will loss. We should invest in the asset which is
move opposite with market, such as defensive stock. This is due to they tend to be less
susceptible to downswings in the business cycle. Furthermore, we also need to add blue
chip stocks as our investment asset. Blue chips stocks are less risk than other assets and it
is able to get high return. Blue chip stocks are not immune from bear market. With this,
we are able to sustain in unfavorable market which occurs in this recent year.
Moreover, we should not only focus in stock investment. We should diversify our
portfolio with some fixed-income securities such as bonds. Bonds are long-term debt
instruments where a bondholder has a contractual right to receive periodic interest
payments plus return of the bond’s face value at maturity. Bond is less risky compared to
common stock as bond offer contractually guaranteed returns. Thus, by adding bonds
into a portfolio may protect the value of the portfolio.
Besides, invest in mutual funds may also hedge some market risk. A mutual fund
is a portfolio of stocks, bonds, or other assets that were purchased with a pool of funds
contributed by various investors and are managed by an investment company on behalf of
61
its clients. Mutual funds allow investors to construct a well-diversified portfolio without
having to invest a large sum of money.
To construct a well-diversified portfolio, we must establish a clear investment
goal. Whether we want to accumulate retirement funds or we want to enhance our
income. If we want to accumulate retirement funds, we should adopt a long term
investment plan which can provide a stable return over a period of time. In contrast, if we
want to enhance our income, we should go for short term investment which is more
volatile. As the more volatile the investment, the risky the investment; the risky the
investment, the higher the potential of return.
62
REFERENCES
Investopedia. (2013, 11 18). Retrieved from Modern Portfolio Theory - MPT:
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/modernportfoliotheory.asp
Wikipedia. (2013). Retrieved from Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk-return_spectrum
63
APPENDIX
64
PRINT SCREEN OF SOLVER FUNCTION
CASE 1: SHORT SELLING IS ALLOWED
OPTIMAL +0.001i. Set Objective - Set Return of Portfolio as the target cell to the Value of
Optimal +0.001 which is -.0655982629658807. ii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage
of each stock).iii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1.
(Note: For short selling is allowed, uncheck the column for Make Unconstrained Variables Non-Negative)
iv. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling Allowed table (as shown in Table 1.4) and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.5).
65
OPTIMAL +0.002
i. Set Objective - Set Return of Portfolio as the target cell to the Value of Optimal +0.002 which is -0.0645982629658807.
ii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage of each stock).
iii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1. (Note: For short selling is allowed, uncheck the column for Make Unconstrained Variables Non-Negative)
iv. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling Allowed table (as shown in Table 1.4) and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.5).
66
OPTIMAL -0.001
i. Set Objective - Set Return of Portfolio as the target cell to the Value of Optimal -0.001 which is -0.0675982629658807.
ii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage of each stock).
iii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1. (Note: For short selling is allowed, uncheck the column for Make Unconstrained Variables Non-Negative)
iv. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling Allowed table (as shown in Table 1.4) and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.5).
67
OPTIMAL -0.002
i. Set Objective - Set Return of Portfolio as the target cell to the Value of Optimal +-0.002 which is -.0.0685982629658807.
ii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage of each stock).
iii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1. (Note: For short selling is allowed, uncheck the column for Make Unconstrained Variables Non-Negative)
iv. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling Allowed table (as shown in Table 1.4) and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.5).
68
CASE 2: SHORT SELLING IS NOT ALLOWED
OPTIMAL +0.001
i. Set Objective - Set Return of Portfolio as the target cell to the Value of Optimal +-0.001 which is -0.0587254550793991.
ii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage of each stock).
iii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1. (Note: For short selling is not allowed, check the column for Make Unconstrained Variables Non-Negative)
iv. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling Allowed table (as shown in Table 1.4) and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.5).
69
OPTIMAL +0.002
i. Set Objective - Set Return of Portfolio as the target cell to the Value of Optimal
+-0.002 which is -0.0577254550793991.
ii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage of
each stock).
iii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1. (Note: For
short selling is not allowed, check the column for Make Unconstrained Variables
Non-Negative)
iv. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling Allowed table (as shown in Table 1.4)
and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.5).
70
OPTIMAL -0.001
i. Set Objective - Set Return of Portfolio as the target cell to the Value of Optimal -0.001 which is -0.0607254550793991.
ii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage of each stock).
iii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1. (Note: For short selling is not allowed, check the column for Make Unconstrained Variables Non-Negative)
iv. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling Allowed table (as shown in Table 1.4) and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.5).
71
OPTIMAL -0.002
i. Set Objective - Set Return of Portfolio as the target cell to the Value of Optimal -0.002 which is -0.0617254550793991.
ii. By Changing Variable Cells - Variable Cells will be WD_PF (the weightage of each stock).
iii. Subject to the Constraints - Set the Total Weightage always equal to 1. (Note: For short selling is not allowed, check the column for Make Unconstrained Variables Non-Negative)
iv. Solve and copy the value to the Short Selling Allowed table (as shown in Table 1.4) and also the Investment Portfolio Table (as shown in Table 3.5).
72