188
Research Collection Doctoral Thesis Low-P tolerance of various maize cultivars the contribution of the root exudation Author(s): Gaume, Alain Publication Date: 2000 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-003877645 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection . For more information please consult the Terms of use . ETH Library

Rights / License: Research Collection In Copyright - Non ...23357/eth-23357-02.pdfSikuani) and alow-Psusceptiblemaizecultivar {Zea SA3) werecomparedwith aSwisscultivar {ZeamaysL. Corso)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Research Collection

    Doctoral Thesis

    Low-P tolerance of various maize cultivarsthe contribution of the root exudation

    Author(s): Gaume, Alain

    Publication Date: 2000

    Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-003877645

    Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted

    This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For moreinformation please consult the Terms of use.

    ETH Library

    https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-003877645http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-NC/1.0/https://www.research-collection.ethz.chhttps://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/terms-of-use

  • Diss. ETH Nr. 13529

    Low-P tolerance of various maize cultivars :

    the contribution of the root exudation

    A dissertation submitted to the

    SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

    ZURICH

    For the degree of

    DOCTOR OF NATURAL SCIENCES

    Presented by

    ALAIN GAUME

    Dipl. Ing. Agr. ETH-Zurich

    Born March 03, 1970

    Citizen of Epiquerez (JU)

    Accepted on the recommendation of

    Prof. Dr. E. Frossard, examiner

    Prof. Dr. H. Sticher, co-examiner

    Prof. Dr. A. Guckert, co-examiner

    Prof. Dr. W. Horst, co-examiner

    Zurich, 2000

  • Table of contents

    LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

    ABSTRACT 1

    RESUME 3

    GENERAL INTRODUCTION 6

    Importance of phosphorus (P) in crop production 6

    P deficiency and availability : the problem 6

    Strategies to alleviate P deficiency and low-P availability 7

    Plant P efficiency 8

    P nutrition: the contribution of root exudates 9

    Objectives, hypothesizes and progress of this present research work 10

    CHAPTER I: Phosphate acquisition by Zea mays L. in 13

    sand-ferrihydrite-phosphate systems.

    Keywords 13

    Abstract 13

    Introduction 14

    Materials and Methods 15

    Results and Discussion 20

    Conclusion 48

  • Table of contents

    CHAPTER II: Low-P tolerance of maize cultivars (Zea mays L.): 50

    Significance of root growth, and organic acids

    and acid phosphatase root exudation.

    Preamble 50

    Keywords 51

    Abstract 51

    Introduction 52

    Materials and Methods 54

    Results and Discussion 58

    Conclusion 76

    CHAPTER III: Aluminum resistance in two cultivars ofZea mays L.: 78

    Root exudation of organic acids and influence of

    phosphorus nutrition.

    Preamble 78

    Keywords 79

    Abstract 79

    Introduction 80

    Materials and Methods 82

    Results and Discussion 85

    Conclusion 93

  • Table of contents

    CHAPTER IV: Effect of some organic acids on P sorption, 94

    desorption and exchangeability on a

    synthetic ferrihydrite.

    Preamble 94

    Keywords 95

    Abstract 95

    Introduction 96

    Materials and Methods 97

    Results and Discussion 102

    Conclusion 117

    CHAPTER V: Effect of maize root mucilage on P 120

    adsorption and exchangeability on

    a synthetic ferrihydrite.

    Preamble 120

    Keywords 121

    Abstract 121

    Introduction 122

    Materials and Methods 123

    Results and Discussion 128

  • Table of

    GENERAL CONCLUSION 143

    P and Fe mobilization in soil: 144

    the influence of soil mineral properties

    Low-P tolerance of maize plants: 144

    the contribution of some putative mechanisms

    Root exudation 144

    Root biomass, root length and other morphological traits 145

    Efficiency of some organic root exudates, of the root system 146

    and plant development in P mobilization

    Tropical acid soils: 147

    the Al and P dilemma

    Fe acquisition by maize plants: 148

    the contribution of some root exudates

    The rhizosphere: 148

    roots can affect mineral properties and P chemistry

    Outlook 149

    LITERATURE CITED 151

    REMERCIEMENTS

    CURRICULUM VITAE

  • List of abbreviations

    ANOVA Analysis of variance

    CEC Cation exchange capacity

    CIAT International Center for Tropical Agriculture

    CIMMYT International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center

    Cp Phosphate concentration in solution

    DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid

    EAWAG Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology

    E(t) Quantity of isotopically exchanged P at time t

    ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

    Fed Dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate-extractable Fe

    Fe0 Oxalate-extractable Fe

    GA Galacturonic acid

    ICRAF International Center for Research in Agroforestry

    ITÖ Institute for Terrestrial Ecology

    K Affinity constant of the compound for the ferrihydrite

    MW Molecular weight

    n Decrease with time of 33P activity remaining in the solution

    NST NST90201 (S) CO-422-2-3-1-7 maize cultivar

    PEP Phosphoerco/pyruvate

    PEPC Phosphoefto/pyruvate carboxylase

    PAE Phosphate acquisition efficiency

    PGA Polygalacturonic acid

    pNP p-nitrophenol

  • List of abbreviations

    /;NPP p-nitrophenylphosphate

    PUE Phosphate utilization efficiency

    PZC Point of zero charge

    Qa Amount of adsorbed compound

    Qa max Maximal amount of adsorbed compound

    R Introduced amount of radioactivity at time 0

    r(t) Amount of radioactivity remaining in the solution after t minutes of

    isotopic exchange

    RM Root mucilage

    RM dry Treatment root mucilage with dry ferrihydrite

    RM wet Treatment root mucilage with ferrihydrite dispersed in deionized water

    prior to mucilage adsorption

    RNA Ribonucleic acid

    SA3 SA3-C4HC (16x25)-2-4-9-7-B-B-B-B-l maize cultivar

    SD Standard deviation

    SE Standard error

    SSA Specific surface area

  • Abstract -1

    Phosphorus (P) deficiency is, with aluminum (Al) toxicity, one of the main limiting

    factors for crop production in acid tropical soils. The strong P sorption on Fe and Al

    oxides has been shown to be responsible for the low plant availability of both applied P

    and soil P in these soils. Scientists have been able to identify maize genotypes that are

    adapted to such unfavourable plant growth conditions. The major aims of this work were

    to determine i) the influence of some iron oxide properties on plant P and Fe acquisition,

    and ii) the contribution of root exudates in the low-P tolerance and Al resistance of some

    maize cultivars. A low-P tolerant {Zea mays L. NST), a low-P, Al-resistant and acid soil

    tolerant {Zea mays L. Sikuani) and a low-P susceptible maize cultivar {Zea mays L. SA3)

    were compared with a Swiss cultivar {Zea mays L. Corso).

    In a sand-ferrihydrite-P system, with Sikuani and Corso and two different ferrihydrites,

    this work underlined the importance of some surface properties of soil minerals, such as

    the specific surface area and the porosity, on P and Fe acquisition by maize. The effect of

    the presence of roots on some properties of poorly crystallized minerals, such as

    ferrihydrite, was demonstrated. The ferrihydrite and the P bound to the mineral

    represented the only source of Fe and P for the plants. The exchangeability and the

    acquisition of P by the plant decreased, while Fe acquisition increased with increasing

    specific surface area and porosity of the ferrihydrite. Using the isotopic exchange kinetic

    method, our results suggested that the main source of P for maize was the P isotopically

    exchangeable in a week. After 12 weeks of plant growth, P and Fe acquisition by plants

    were positively related to the higher root dry weight of Sikuani than of Corso. The

    observed decrease of the specific surface area, of the porosity, and of the oxalate-

    extractable Fe (Fe0), and the sorption of organic matter in the ferrihydrite adhering to the

    roots were positively correlated with the decreased ferrihydrite P-sorption capacity during

    plant growth. The presence of organic matter in the mineral adhering to the roots

    demonstrated the release of organic compounds from maize roots.

    Under hydroponic sterile conditions and after 18 days of plant growth, the contribution of

    root exudation to the low-P tolerance of the four selected maize cultivars was confirmed.

    Under P deficiency organic acid contents in roots, in phloem sap and in root exudates

    increased. Differences between genotypes in the organic acids content of roots and

    phloem were not related to their low-P tolerance. However, root exudation increased

  • Abstract - 2

    more strongly for the cultivar NST, in particular, and Sikuani, than SA3 and Corso. There

    was a difference between genotypes in the organic acid composition of phloem and root

    contents, and root exudates. Trarcs-aconitic acid and malic acid were predominant. Root

    acid phosphatase activity was higher in the cultivars tolerant to low-P conditions. The

    release of protons from maize roots was low and was not related to the low-P tolerance of

    maize cultivars. Under P deficiency root length, root dry weight, and anthocyanidin

    coloration of leaves were higher in tolerant to low-P soils (NST and Sikuani), than in

    susceptible cultivars (SA3 and Corso) and might contribute to the low-P tolerance of

    maize plants. Our research demonstrated that the lower Al-related inhibition of root

    growth in Sikuani, than in Corso was associated with a higher Al precipitation in the

    presence of P in root tissues, higher contents and concomitantly higher exudation of

    citric, malic and succinic acids, all known to complex Al, for Sikuani than for Corso.

    The efficiency of some organic compounds, present in maize root exudates, to mobilize P

    bound to ferrihydrite was studied. In competitive adsorption treatments with P on a

    synthetic ferrihydrite, organic acids decreased P adsorption and increased P mobilization

    and exchangeability of sorbed P. The effect of organic acids decreased in the order citric,

    malic, trans-aconitic, succinic and formic acid and was higher when sorbed prior to P

    addition, than the other way around. Nevertheless at the rate determined in our study, root

    exudation of organic acids by maize might not contribute to a significant enhancement in

    the P mobilization of P adsorbed on ferrihydrite in our conditions. Citric, malic and trans-

    aconitic acids to some extent solubilized ferrihydrite. Similarly, the preliminary addition

    of a high-molecular-weight root exudate, mucilage, collected on the nodal roots of Corso,

    strongly decreased the subsequent P adsorption. This effect was mainly due to the

    flocculation of ferrihydrite aggregates in the presence of mucilage, which limited the

    transport of P from the solution to the adsorption sites. The mobilization by the root

    mucilage of P sorbed on the ferrihydrite was low and the solubilization of ferrihydrite not

    detected.

  • Résumé - 3

    La déficience en phosphore (P) représente, avec la toxicité à l'aluminium (Al), un des

    principaux facteurs limitant la production végétale dans les sols tropicaux acides. La forte

    fixation de P sur les oxydes de fer et d'aluminium contenus dans ces sols a été démontrée

    comme étant responsable de la faible disponibilité pour les plantes du P appliqué sous

    forme d'engrais et du P du sol. Des génotypes de maïs adaptés à ces difficiles conditions

    de croissance ont été identifiés. Les principaux buts de ce travail étaient de déterminer i)

    l'influence de quelques propriétées des oxydes de fer pour l'acquisition de P et de Fe par

    les plantes, et ii) la contribution des exsudats racinaires dans la tolérance de quelques

    cultivars de maïs aux sols pauvres en P et à la toxicité à l'aluminium. Un génotype

    tolérant aux sols pauvres en P {Zea mays L. NST), un génotype tolérant aux sols acides,

    pauvres en P et présentant une haute teneur en Al {Zea mays L. Sikuani), et un génotype

    non adapté aux sols pauvres en P {Zea mays L. SA3) furent comparés à un génotype

    cultivé en Suisse {Zea mays L. Corso).

    Dans des systèmes expérimentaux sable-ferrihydrite-P, avec Sikuani et Corso et deux

    différentes ferrihydrites, ce travail souligne l'importance de quelques propriétés des

    minéraux du sol, telles que la surface spécifique et la porosité, pour le prélèvement du P

    et du Fe par le maïs. L'action racinaire sur certaines propriétés de minéraux faiblement

    cristallisés, tels que la ferrihydrite, est démontrée. La ferrihydrite et le P lié à cette

    dernière représentaient les seules sources en P et Fe pour la plante. L'échangeabilité et le

    prélèvement du P par la plante diminue, alors que le prélèvement du Fe augmente avec

    l'augmentation de la surface spécifique et de la porosité de la ferrihydrite. A l'aide de la

    méthode des cinétiques d' échanges isotopiques, nos résultats suggèrent que la source

    principale de P pour le maïs est le P isotopiquement échangeable en une semaine. Après

    12 semaines de croisssance, le prélèvement de P et de Fe par la plante est positivement

    corrélé à la matière sèche racinaire plus élevée chez Sikuani que Corso. La diminution de

    la suface spécifique, de la porosité et de la fraction de Fe extractable par l'oxalate (Fe0),

    et la présence de matière organique dans la fraction de ferrihydrite adhérante aux racines

    sont positivement corrélés à la diminution de la capacité d'adsorption en P de la

    ferrihydrite pendant la croissance de la plante. La présence de matière organique dans la

  • Résumé - 4

    fraction de ferrihydrite adhérante aux racines démontre la libération de composés

    organiques par les racines de maïs.

    Dans des conditions hydroponiques stériles et après 18 jours de croissance, la

    contribution de 1' exsudation racinaire à la tolérance aux sols pauvres en P des quatre

    génotypes de maïs fut confirmée. Dans des conditions de déficience en P, la teneur en

    acides organiques des racines, du phloème exsudé par la tige et des exsudats racinaires

    augmentent. Les différences mesurées entre génotypes dans la teneur des racines et du

    phloem en acides organiques ne sont pas liées à leur tolérance aux sols pauvres en P.

    Cependant, l'exsudation racinaire de ces composés augmente pour les cultivars NST, en

    particulier, et Sikuani plus fortement que pour SA3 et Corso. Des différences entre

    génotypes existent dans la composition en acides organiques du phloème, des racines et

    des exsudats racinaires. Les acides trans-aconiûque et malique sont prédominants.

    L'activité racinaire en phosphatase est plus élevée dans les cultivars tolérants aux sols

    pauvres en P. La libération par les racines de maïs de protons est faible et n'est pas

    corrélée à la tolérance des cultivars aux sols pauvres en P. Lors de déficience en P, la

    longueur racinaire, la matière sèche racinaire et la présence d'anthocyanidine dans les

    feuilles sont plus élevés pour les cultivars tolérants (NST et Sikuani) que susceptibles

    (SA3 et Corso) aux sols pauvres en P et pourraient contribuer à cette tolérance. Nos

    recherches démontrent que la plus faible inhibition par Al de la croissance racinaire pour

    Sikuani que Corso, est associée à une précipitation plus importante de l'aluminium dans

    les tissues racinaires en présence de P, à une plus haute teneur et plus forte exsudation

    des acides citrique, malique et succinique, connus comme pouvant complexé

    l'aluminium, chez Sikuani que chez Corso.

    L'efficacité de quelques composés organiques, présents dans les exsudats racinaires de

    maïs, de mobiliser du P lié à la ferrihydrite, fut étudiée. Dans des expériences

    d'adsorptions compétitives avec P sur une ferrihydrite synthétique, les acides organiques

    testés diminuent l'adsorption du P, et augmentent la mobilisation et l'échangeabilité du P

    adsorbé. L'influence des acides organiques diminue dans l'ordre citrique, malique, trans-

    aconitique, succinique et formique et est plus importante lorsque leur asdorption se fait

  • Résumé - 5

    avant celle du P, qu'après. Toutefois aux concentrations déterminées dans notre travail,

    l'exsudation racinaire d'acides organiques par le maïs ne pourraient pas contribuer dans

    une large mesure à la mobilisation de P adsorbé sur la ferrihydrite. La solubilisation à

    différents degrés de la ferrihydrite par les acides citrique, malique et îra/w-aconitique est

    démontrée. Dans des expériences d'adsorptions semblables, l'addition préliminaire d'un

    exsudât racinaire de haut poids moléculaire, le mucilage, collecté sur les racines nodales

    du cultivar Corso, diminue fortement 1'adsorption subséquente de P. Cet effet est

    principalement dû à la flocculation des aggrégats de ferrihydrite en présence de mucilage.

    Le transfert de P de la solution vers les sites d'adsorption étant ainsi limité. La

    mobilisation par le mucilage du P lié à la ferrihydrite est faible. La solubilisation de la

    ferrihydrite par le mucilage racinaire ne fut pas détectée.

  • General Introduction - 6

    Importance of phosphorus (P) in crop production

    Phosphorus, as phosphate, is an integral component of a number of important compounds

    present in plant cells, such as the sugar-phosphates used in respiration and photosynthesis

    and the phospholipids that make up plant membranes. It is also a component of

    nucleotides used in plant energy metabolism and in the DNA and RNA molecules. P

    requirement for optimal growth is in the range of 3-5 mg g" plant dry matter during the

    vegetative stage of growth. P deficiency results in reduced plant growth, delayed crop

    maturity, and a reduction in crop yield.

    P deficiency and availability: the problem

    Soil P deficiency is one of the most limiting factors affecting plant growth on a world¬

    wide basis (Fairhurst et al., 1999). About 5.7 billion ha of soils do not contain sufficient

    available P for optimum crop production (Sanchez and Salinas, 1981; World Bank, 1994;

    Batjes, 1997). Von Uexkiill and Mutert (1995) estimate that 95% of the acid soils located

    in tropical Africa, America, Asia, and the Pacific and Australia are deficient in P. In

    many of these soils the extent of the P deficiency is so high that plant growth ceases once

    the P stored in the seed has been exhausted. Phosphorus deficiency affects crop

    production not only directly, but also soil fertility as a whole, rendering low-P soils prone

    to degradation (Sanchez et al., 1997).

    Soil P is derived from the weathering of the primary P minerals (mostly apatite).

    Geochemical and biological processes of pedogenesis affect the total amount of P in soil

    and its availability for plant (Walker and Syers, 1976). In strongly weathered soils there

    tends to be less P, due to leaching and erosion. In the tropics and subtropics (Oxisols,

    Ultisols and Alfisols), strong weathering is also correlated with an increase in the amount

    of sesquioxides, which exhibit high P-sorption properties (Parfitt, 1978; Frossard et al.,

    1995; Torrent, 1997), and a decrease in the proportion in primary calcium minerals

    (Sanchez and Logan, 1992). While it is suggested (Tiessen et al., 1992) that in highly

    weathered soils most of the plant-available P is derived from the mineralisation of

    organic P forms, in less weathered soils plant-available P is derived predominantly from

    inorganic P fractions. As a result of the inherent characteristics of soil parent material and

  • General Introduction - 7

    of weathering, the limited availability of P in tropical soils may be due to low content

    and/or severe P sorption.

    Strategies to alleviate P deficiency and low-P availability

    The most obvious strategy to alleviate P deficiency is to add large quantities of phosphate

    fertilizers to P-deficient soils, either as water soluble P fertilizer or as rock phosphate

    (Roche et al., 1980; Von Uexkiill and Mutert, 1995; Sanchez et al., 1997). The alleviation

    of soil P deficiency, with large applications of P fertilizer during vegetative crop growth,

    has been an essential step in the development of large and sustainable yields of the crops

    grown in low-P acid soils (Mutert and Sri Adiningsih, 1998). This strategy faces however

    two problems: i) in tropical areas very little P fertilizers are usually available, either

    because of the low purchasing power of the indigenous small-scale farmers or because of

    the lack of infrastructure for distribution, and ii) phosphate resources are limited and not

    renewable. For all these reasons the development of innovative local-scale farming

    systems based on the use of renewable, and indigenous and economically available

    source of P, such as recaptured urban residual P, waste recycled P, or animal and green

    manure P is important. However, alternative P sources might not be able to cover the

    severe P-deficiency conditions in the tropical acid soils and to sufficiently increase the

    agricultural production in many developing countries.

    Another possibility is to identify plant species that are efficient in term of P uptake, and

    to include them in crop rotation in combination with relatively low levels of P inputs.

    This can result in an increased accumulation of P in the biomass in the upper horizon,

    leading in the long term to an increase in soil P fertility and to an increased production at

    the agrosystem level. Successful examples of such strategies include the use of legumes

    or other plants as green manure in pastures or cereal cropping systems (Friesen et al.,

    1997; Gijsman et al., 1997; Rao et al., 1997; Sanchez et al., 1997; Oberson et al., 1999),

    or the implementation of agroforestry systems (Hands et al., 1995; Sanchez et al., 1997).

    The rotation of maize with Sesbania sesban used as green manure rather than continuous

    maize cropping on P-deficient soil has been shown to increase maize yields (Maroko et

    al., 1999). Such strategies are highly promising, but they encounter a resistance from

  • General Introduction - 8

    farmers' side, because for instance of the difficulty of managing legumes or because of

    the long time needed for their installation (e.g. in the case of agroforestry systems).

    Another strategy is to improve the P efficiency of crops and forage plants, i.e. either to

    increase the acquisition of P by plants or to decrease the amount of P needed by plant to

    obtain an optimum yield. This aim can be achieved either by breeding programs or by

    genetic engineering. Breeding programs have been successful for instance in producing

    maize cultivars tolerant to soil acidity (Granados et al., 1993; Pandey et al., 1994). Plant

    biotechnology methods could be used to improve P-acquisition efficiency by identifying

    genes responsible for the adaptation of given plants to low-P soils and to transfer them in

    agricultural crops that exhibit a low P efficiency. But the use of P-efficient genotypes is

    not an alternative to P fertilizer application. Improved plants will have to be included in

    cropping systems in combination with relatively low levels of P inputs.

    None of these research directions can be neglected in the search for an increased food

    production through sustainable agriculture in the tropics. However, as suggested by Rao

    et al. (1999a), to optimize the use of strategic P inputs and native soil P in P-limited soils,

    research needs to focus on identifying genotypic differences and on understanding the

    specific mechanisms involved in the acquisition of P from different P sources.

    Plant P efficiency

    Large differences in P efficiency exist between plant species and between cultivars within

    species. Genotypes that can acquire and use scarce P resources more efficiently from

    low-P soils could improve and stabilize agricultural production (Friesen et al., 1997; Rao

    et al., 1999b). Genotypical differences in nutrient efficiency are related to differences in

    efficiency of acquisition by the roots, or in utilization by the plant, or both (Sattelmacher

    et al., 1994; Horst et al., 1996b; Rao et al., 1999a). Phosphate acquisition efficiency

    (PAE) is defined as the total amount of P taken up by the plant, or as the amount of P

    taken up per unit of root length. Phosphate utilization efficiency (PUE) is defined as the

    dry matter production per unit nutrient in the dry matter (Marschner, 1995a).

  • General Introduction - 9

    Since plants take up their P by the roots as orthophosphate from the soil solution,

    important parameters in determining PAE are: root length, diameter, branching pattern,

    abundance and length of root hairs (Fredeen et al. 1989; Lynch et al. 1991; Mollier and

    Pellerin, 1999). Other processes important for the PAE are the rate of orthophosphate

    uptake from the solution (Km), the minimum concentration at which uptake occurs

    (Cmin) (Waisel et al., 1996), the exudation of protons, of complexing or chelating

    substances or of enzymes in the rhizosphere (Uren and Reisenauer, 1988; Raghothama,

    1999; Jones and Farrar, 1999), and the symbiosis with mycorrhizal fungi (Wilcox, 1991;

    Tarafdar and Marschner, 1994; Marschner, 1995a). The PUE on the other side includes,

    besides P acquisition, P demand within the cell, P transport within the shoot and within

    the root, compartmentation within the aerial parts (including the seeds) and within the

    root, and shoot-root transport (Marschner, 1995a).

    P nutrition: the contribution of root exudates

    The zone of soil surrounding the root, the rhizosphere, is chemically, physically and

    biologically different from that of the bulk soil. Typically the rhizosphere is characterized

    by elevated microbial population and lower nutrient availability than the bulk soil

    (Marschner, 1995a). The creation of the rhizosphere is driven by the release of a diverse

    range of organic compounds from the root to the adjacent soil, fuelling microbial growth

    and proliferation. The extent of this zone depends upon the quantity and diffusion

    characteristics of the root exudates and soil properties such as water content, CEC, and

    texture; typically the rhizosphere extends for 1 to 2 mm away from the root surface

    (Waisel et al., 1996). Root exudates are known to contain both high (mucilage, proteins,

    sloughed cells) and low (sugars, amino acids, organic acids) molecular weight

    components (Uren and Reisenauer, 1988). Root exudates can facilitate the induction of

    nodulation and the establishment of mycorrhizal association (Marschner, 1995a;

    Kapulnik et al., 1993), they can contribute to metal detoxification (Horst et al., 1982;

    Delhaize et al., 1993b), they can increase water availability (Guinel and McCully, 1986)

    and root movement (Ray et al., 1988) or/and can attract root pathogens such as

    nematodes (Cohn et al., 1996). There is now overwhelming evidence that some plants

    directly modify the rhizosphere in order to gain access to previously unavailable reserves

  • General Introduction -10

    of soil nutrients, e.g. Fe (Römheld, 1987) and P (Bar-Yosef, 1996b). While differences in

    root morphological characteristics (growth and distribution, root diameter, and root hair

    length) explain to a large extent the differences among cultivars in P acquisition

    (Sattelmacher et al., 1994), there is still limited evidence that root exudates actually play

    a significant role in plant P acquisition. This is mainly due to the poor experimental

    techniques used for quantifying the rate of exudation from roots (Jones and Farrar, 1999).

    Some root exudates can induce the release of orthophosphate to the soil solution and then

    enhance P acquisition by plants. Root exudates relevant for plant P nutrition include

    phosphatase enzymes, organic acids, and H+. Phosphatase can increase the hydrolysis of

    soil organic P (Tarafdar and Jungk, 1987). Some organic acids, such as citric acid, malic

    acid or oxalic acid, are known i) to compete with P for similar adsorption sites, whereby

    organic acids directly replace P by ligand exchange (on crystalline Al- and Fe-oxides)

    (Earl et al., 1979; Parfitt, 1979; Gerke, 1992; Hue, 1991; Staunton and Leprince, 1996),

    and ii) to complex metal ions in the exchange matrix holding the P (Ca in calcium

    phosphate or Fe3+ and Al3+ in Fe- and Al-oxides) (Zhang et al., 1985; Otani et al., 1996).

    Protons released from plant roots can solubilize inorganic P (Grinsted et al., 1982;

    Hedley et al., 1982; Moorby et al., 1988).

    Objectives, hypotheses and progress of this present research work

    The general objective of this research is to understand some processes governing P

    acquisition efficiency in a model crop: maize, in order to increase on a long-term basis

    plant yields in the tropical low-P acid soils. The specific aim of this present work is to

    study the effect of P deficient conditions on the growth and the root exudation of various

    maize cultivars known to be more or less tolerant to low-P conditions. And then to

    determine under controlled conditions the efficiency of some selected root exudates on P

    mobilization.

    In collaboration with the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center

    (CIMMYT, Mexico) which has the world mandate for developing maize cultivars for

    developing countries, some genotypes selected for different tolerance to low-P soils were

    compared. We hypothesized that the tolerance of the cultivars tolerant to low-P

  • General Introduction -11

    conditions might be due to a higher P-acquisition efficiency (PAE) through the root

    exudation of organic acids or phosphatase enzymes, than cultivars susceptible to low-P

    soils. Since proton release from roots and root architecture can also strongly affect the P

    acquisition efficiency (Mollier and Pellerin, 1999; Bertrand, 1998) they will also be

    considered.

    The different sections of this work are organized as follows. First, in order to better

    understand the ability of maize to mobilize the phosphate adsorbed on soil particles and

    to investigate plant growth under phosphate stress conditions, a pot experiment will be

    carried out (chapter I). We will use two synthetic ferrihydrites as a model for a mineral

    highly reactive towards P. The acquisition of P by the plant from the rhizospheric and

    non-rhizospheric portions of the soil will be determined. The efficiency of two maize

    cultivars, with a priori different tolerance to low-P conditions, in acquiring P adsorbed on

    the ferrihydrite will be studied. The effect of maize roots on the properties of the

    ferrihydrite will complete this research.

    In the second chapter of this research we will develop a system for measuring root

    exudation under sterile conditions. We will then attempt to determine for four maize

    cultivars, at a seedling growth stadium, if the selected differences in maize plant

    tolerance to low-P conditions could be explained by the exudation of specific organic

    compounds from roots and/or by different root growth. Our research will focus on the

    release of organic acids, acid phosphatase enzymes, and protons.

    In acid soils, crop production is often not only affected by P deficiency but also by the

    presence of plant-toxic Al species. Some organic acids present in the roots and released

    in the rhizosphere are known to complex Al (Delhaize et al., 1993b; Lan et al., 1995). In

    chapter III we will determine if the selected resistance of a maize cultivar to acid soils

    could be related to the synthesis and/or release of organic acids. We will also ascertain if

    resistance to Al is related to the P nutritional status of the plant.

  • General Introduction -12

    Organic acids can modify P sorption onto metallic oxides. The effect of some organic

    acids released by maize roots on P sorption onto a ferrihydrite, and desorption, and on the

    proportion of sorbed P remaining isotopically exchangeable will be determined (chapter

    IV).

    Seminal and nodal roots surfaces of maize, particularly apical zones, are covered by high-

    molecular-weight mucilage, which consists mainly of polysaccharides (Cortez and Bill,

    1982). In the last part of this research (chapter V) we will study the effect of mucilage on

    P sorption and desorption on the surface of a ferrihydrite and on the proportion of sorbed

    P remaining isotopically exchangeable.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems -13

    Keywords: Iron acquisition, Iron oxide porosity, Isotopic exchange kinetic, Phosphorus

    acquisition, Zea mays. L, Ferrihydrite.

    Abstract

    Iron oxide as a major compound in the sorption of phosphate in soils is responsible for

    the low availability of both applied P and soil P and represents a main source of Fe for

    plants.

    This work underlined the importance of some surface properties of poorly crystallized

    minerals, such as ferrihydrite, on the P and Fe acquisition by two maize cultivars, Corso

    and Sikuani, in sand-ferrihydrite-phosphate systems. Sikuani was selected as tolerant to

    low-P acid soils. Two ferrihydrites with different specific surface area (SSA = 172.9 and

    317.9 m2/g) and porosity were compared. Using the isotopic exchange kinetic method we

    defined the nature of the P taken up by the plant. The effect of the maize roots on the

    properties of the ferrihydrite present in the rhizosphere was also determined.

    P exchangeability and acquisition by the plant decreased with increasing SSA and

    porosity of the ferrihydrite. In the ferrihydrite sample with a high SSA incubated without

    plant the amount of isotopically exchangeable P decreased during the experiment, while

    no change was observed for the ferrihydrite with the lower SSA. Fe acquisition by plant

    increased with increasing SSA and porosity. P acquisition was higher in the fraction of

    ferrihydrite adhering to the roots. Differences between Corso and Sikuani cultivars in P

    and Fe mobilization was demonstrated. The observed larger root system of the cultivar

    Sikuani than of Corso explained the higher acquisition of P and Fe by Sikuani than by

    Corso after 12 weeks of plant growth. Our results suggested that the main sources of P

    for both maize cultivars were the P in the solution and the P isotopically exchangeable

    within one week.

    The SSA, the porosity and the amount of oxalate-extractable Fe (Fe0) of the fraction of

    ferrihydrite adhering to the roots decreased during plant growth, while no change to a

    more crystallized form of iron oxide was observed. These modifications and the presence

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems -14

    of organic compounds in the iron oxide decreased ferrihydrite P-sorption capacity during

    plant growth.

    Introduction

    Phosphorus (P) deficiency is one of the main limiting factor for crop production in acid

    tropical soils (Granados et al., 1993). Aluminum and iron oxides and oxyhydroxides

    (named afterwards oxides) are the main minerals governing P sorption in acid soils (He et

    al., 1992; Parfitt, 1978; Barrow, 1985; Torrent et al., 1990, 1992). The reaction of P with

    metallic oxides involve a rapid, strong ligand exchange with reactive hydroxyl groups

    located on the oxide surface. The degree of crystallinity or porosity of iron oxides also

    strongly affects the extent of phosphate sorption (Willett et al., 1988).

    The strong P sorption on metallic oxides has been shown to be responsible for the low

    plant availability of both applied P and soil P in acid soils (He et al. 1991; Parfitt 1978;

    Menon et al. 1995). Laboratory and greenhouse studies indicate that P sorbed onto

    metallic oxides is potentially available to plants although it can be only very slowly

    released (Parfitt 1979; Soltan et al., 1993; He et al. 1994). This observation is in

    agreement with the long-term residual effect of P fertilizers determined in variable-

    charge soils (Barrow 1985). Most of these studies have been done, however, with well

    crystallized minerals, such as goethite and hematite. A lack of information exists on the

    effect of poorly crystallized iron oxides, such as ferrihydrite, on the P nutrition of plants.

    Because of its high specific surface area, ferrihydrite can profoundly influence soil

    properties, even if present in low concentrations (Childs, 1992). Ferrihydrite can

    represent most of the specific surface area and P adsorption-sites in soils (Childs, 1992).

    The solubility of Fe in soils is largely controlled by Fe oxides (Lindsay, 1991). The low

    solubility of these minerals is the main cause of Fe deficiency in plants.

    To cope with low P or Fe availability in soils plants have evolved various strategies:

    increase their nutrient acquisition efficiency (total amount of nutrient taken up by the

    plant, or amount of nutrient taken up per unit of root length) and/or increase their nutrient

    use efficiency (dry matter production per unit nutrient in the dry matter) (Marschner and

    Römheld, 1994). Large differences in P and Fe acquisition-efficiency or use-efficiency

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems -15

    exist between different species and also between genotypes of a single species

    (Marschner 1995a; Sattelmacher et al., 1994; Horst et al., 1996a). More specifically, there

    is now ample evidence that some plants can profoundly modify the physico-chemical and

    biological properties of their rhizosphere in order to take up P and Fe present in sparingly

    soluble minerals (Marschner, 1995 a).

    The aim of this work was to assess the importance of some physicochemical properties

    (specific surface area, porosity, amount of P adsorbed) of a poorly crystallized iron oxide,

    ferrihydrite, on the P and Fe acquisition by maize. Two maize cultivars with a priori

    different tolerance to soils with a low P-availability were considered. In a first step the

    uptake of P and Fe by maize from P-ferrihydrite complex was studied in a pot

    experiment. Then the changes in isotopically exchangeable P remaining on the oxide

    after different periods of plant growth was investigated in order to obtain some

    information on the nature of the P taken up by the plant. And in the last part the changes

    in ferrihydrite properties (specific surface area, porosity, oxalate-extractable Fe) upon

    plant growth was studied. All along this work the fraction of ferrihydrite adhering to the

    roots was distinguished from the fraction of ferrihydrite non-adhering to the roots so as to

    check if the presence of maize roots has had an effect on ferrihydrite properties and

    mobilization of P and Fe.

    Materials and Methods

    Substrate.

    The substrate used in this work was a sand-ferrihydrite mixture with in a weightweight

    ratio of 100:1. Quartz sand (0.7-1.2 mm and 5-8 mm) was first washed into a 1.5 M HCl

    solution for 72 h, thoroughly rinsed in distilled water and dried at room temperature. Two

    2-line ferrihydrites, called hereafter ferrihydrite I and II, were used after having been

    ground (labor planet mill type Pulverisette 5 by Fritsch) into particles with a diameter

    between 20 and 200 jim. Ferrihydrite I was purchased from Aldrich (N° 37,125-4), while

    ferrihydrite II was synthesised as described by Schwertmann and Cornell (1991). The

    preparation of ferrihydrite II is presented in the chapters JV and V. The properties of both

    ferrihydrites are presented in the Table 1.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems -16

    Table 1. Ferrihydrite properties. Fe0 : oxalate-extractable Fe (Schwertmann, 1964); Fej :

    dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate- extractable Fe (Mehra and Jackson, 1960). Fe0 / Fe^: ratio

    oxalate-extractable Fe / dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate-extractable Fe.

    Ferrihydrite I Ferrihydrite II

    2 -1

    Specific surface area (SSA) (m g ) 172.9 317.9

    Porosity (%) 44.8 96.3

    Pore diameter (nm) 5.9 2.7

    Single particles diameter (nm) 10.0 5.0

    Point of zero of charge (PZC) 7.3 7.6

    Fe0 (mg g" ) 435.4 487.7

    Fe0 / Fed 1.0 1.0

    Preparation ofsand-ferrihydrite-P substrates.

    Increasing amounts of P in the form of KH2P04 were mixed to 17.5 g of ferrihydrite in

    300 ml of 50% Hoagland nutrient solution (Hoagland and Arnon, 1938), without P and

    Fe. The four following concentrations of P were added to the mixture: Pi= 6.6 10~3, P2=

    24.8 10"3, P3= 33.0 10"3 and P4= 66.0 10"3 tig P m"2 ferrihydrite. These concentrations

    represented a total amount of 20.0, 75.0, 100.0 and 200.0 mg P per pot within the

    ferrihydrite I treatment, and a total amount of 36.8, 137.9, 183.9 and 367.7 mg P pro pot

    within the ferrihydrite II. The mixture was shaken for 36 h on an end-over-end shaker and

    the P concentration remaining in the solution was determined (Table 2). The ferrihydrite -

    P-Hoagland suspension was then mixed with 1.45 kg of quartz sand (0.7-1.2 mm) and

    poured into 2 1 PVC cylindrical pots (10.5 cm diameter, 22.5 cm height). At the bottom of

    each pot 300 g of the 5-8 mm diameter sand were placed in order to prevent anaerobiosis.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems -17

    Table 2. P in solution (300 ml) and adsorbed after P adsorption on 17.5 g ferrihydrite

    (mg P l"1 and |ig P nT2 ferrihydrite). P1= 6.6 u,g P m~2 ; P2= 24.8 u,g P m"2 ; P3= 33.0 |ig

    P rn2

    ; P4= 66.0 (ig P m"2; n.d. : not detected; mean value ± SE; n = 6.

    P P in solution (mg PI") P adsorbed (jig P m"2 ferrihydrite)

    Ferrihydrite I Ferrihydrite II Ferrihydrite I Ferrihydrite II

    Pi 0.02 ±0.002 n.d. 6.60 ±0.093 6.60 ±0.031

    p2 0.21 ±0.018 0.13 ±0.010 24.78 ±0.217 24.79 ±0.189

    p3 0.84 ±0.024 0.69 ±0.021 32.92 ±0.234 32.96 ±0.218

    P4 87.64 ±0.834 24.13 ±0.616 57.32 ±0.615 64.70 ±0.583

    Vegetal material

    Two maize cultivars, Zea mays L. Corso and Zea mays L. Sikuani, were compared. Corso

    is a Swiss silo maize with fast growth during early development. ICA V-110 Sikuani

    (called hereafter Sikuani) is an open pollinated variety developed in Colombia by

    recombining selected acid soil-tolerant lines derived from Population SA3 (Friesen et al.,

    1997). It yields 4.0 t grain/ha under normal soil conditions and 2.1 t grain/ha under acid

    soil conditions (pH = 4.2 and 60% Al saturation).

    Kernels were selected based on their weight (between 0.28-0.30 g) in order to limit the

    variability between the plants. The seeds were surface sterilized using 18 M H2SO4 for

    30 s. After rinsing, they were dipped into 95° alcohol for 5 min, subsequently washed

    with sterile water and dipped into 10% P-free H2O2 for 30 min, and finally rinsed

    thoroughly with sterile water.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems -18

    Plant growth

    Three pre-germinated seeds were transplanted per pot. At the three leaves vegetative

    growth stage, the pots were thinned to one plant per pot. Controls were carried out with

    the same treatments but without plant. During the entire experiment the pots were kept

    near the water holding capacity by weighing once and watering once or twice a day with

    the modified Hoagland and Arnon nutrient solution (1938). This nutrient solution

    consisted of MgS04 (1 mM); Ca(N03)2 (2.5 mM); K2S04 (1.25 mM); H3B03 (0.01 mM);

    MnS04 (0.001 mM); ZnS04 (0.001 mM); CuS04 (0.0005 mM); Na2Mo04 (0.0005 mM).

    The pH was adjusted to 5.5. The pots were placed in a growth chamber at 25/18 °C,

    75/90% relative humidity, 16/8 h day/night regime and a light intensity of 250 |imol

    quanta m" sec" . The position of the pots was changed within and between the treatments

    twice a week.

    Sampling and analysis

    The sampling periods were fixed at 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks plant growth. At each sampling

    date four pots of each P concentrations with plants, and three control treatment pots

    without plants, were selected. The plants were cut at 3 to 5 cm above substrate level in

    order to simplify the following work steps. After weighting, the pot content was

    transferred with care into a 5 1 Pyrex Becher. This receptacle was slowly shaken and

    some milliliters of the substrate suspension were collected and filtered (0.025 urn). After

    determining the pH, the solution was analyzed for total P (Bowman, 1989) and inorganic

    P (John, 1970). Roots were shaken to separate the sand-ferrihydrite fraction non-adhering

    to the roots. To collect the fraction of substrate adhering to the roots, roots were briefly

    rinsed with a few ml of deionised water. The ferrihydrite (20-200 |im) was properly

    separated from the sand (0.7-1.2 and 5-8 mm) in both sand-ferrihydrite fractions with

    distilled water using a sieve of 0.3 mm diameter mesh and afterwards air-dried.

    Ferrihydrite was analyzed for total P (HC104 digestion method; Dick and Tabatabai,

    1977; Cade-Menun and Lavkulich 1997), isotopically exchangeable P (Fardeau et al.,

    1985), inorganic C (determination of Ca and Mg carbonates; El Mahi et al., 1987), total C

    (CNS-Analyser Carlo Erba ANA 1500), organic C (total C-inorganic C), porosity,

    specific surface area (SSA), and oxalate-extractable Fe (Fe0) (amorphous iron extraction;

    Schwertmann, 1964).

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems -19

    The different plant parts, roots, leaves, shoot and spikes were thoroughly rinsed with

    deionized water and fresh weight was recorded. Dry weight was determined after drying

    in an oven (8 h, 80°C). Dry plant material was cut and ground in an agate ball mill

    (Schwingmühle type MM-2 by Retsch) and analyzed for total Fe (ICP, Varian Liberty

    220) and total P by spectrophotometry (Kontron Uvikon 800), according to John (1970).

    Because of the impossibility to totally remove iron oxide adhering at the root surface, Fe

    content was only determined in the aerial parts of the plants.

    Isotopic exchange kinetic method

    A 1/100 ratio ferrihydrite/water suspension is shaken for 24 h on an end-over-end shaker.

    One ml of a P solution containing (2 10 Bq) was added to the 99 ml of suspension at

    time zero and shaken. At time t = 1, 10, 40, 100, 1440, 4320 and 10080 min, 2 ml of the

    suspension were removed with a plastic syringe and the solution immediately separated

    from the solid phase by filtration at 0.2 \\m. Phosphate ions concentration in solution (Cp)

    and pH were determined after 100 min and 10080 min. The introduced amount of

    radioactivity at time 0 (R, Bq) and the amount of radioactivity remaining in the solution

    after t minutes of isotopic exchange (r(t), Bq) were measured. The quantity of

    isotopically exchanged P at time t, E(t) {\ig P m"2 ferrihydrite) was calculated assuming

    31 33that (i) P and P have the same fate in the system and (ii) whatever the time t, the

    specific activity of the phosphate in the soil solution is identical to that of the isotopically

    exchangeable phosphate in the whole system (Equation [1]).

    r(t)/(ACP) = R/E(t) [1]

    The factor A represents the soil / solution ratio of 1 g of ferrihydrite in 100 ml of water so

    that (ACp) is equivalent to the water-soluble P content of the ferrihydrite expressed in \ag

    P m"2 ferrihydrite.

    Therefore,

    E(t) = ACPR/r(t) [2]

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 20

    The amount of P isotopically exchangeable within 1 min, E i mjn, is an estimate of the

    pool of the free phosphate ions. This is the sum of the phosphate ions in soil solution plus

    the phosphate ions in the solid soil phase that instantaneously exchange with phosphate

    ions in the solution (Salcedo et al. 1991). In this work the amount of P isotopically

    exchangeable within a week (E i week) was calculated as follows.

    E i week = ACPR/r( 10080) [3]

    The amount of P non isotopically exchangeable within a week (E > i week) was calculated

    as the difference between the total amount of P sorbed onto the ferrihydrite and E i week.

    Statistical analysis

    Standard errors calculation was performed using Excel software (Microsoft office 97).

    Analysis of variance was carried out using Statgraphics statistical software (one-way

    ANOVA, Multiple Range Test).

    Results and Discussion

    Plant growth, P and Fe uptake

    Plant growth

    Effect of P supply. The total amount of P brought to the system strongly affected plant

    growth (Table 3). The biomass increased with increasing P supply, while the roots/aerial

    parts ratio decreased. Excepted for the highest P supply (P4= 66.010"3 fig P m"2

    ferrihydrite), P deficiency symptoms were observed on leaves and were characterized by

    anthocyanidin formation: red-purple interveinal chlorosis on length of leaves and by deep

    purple tints on the limb of the leaves. At the lowest P supply treatment (treatment Pi)

    plant growth stopped after 4-5 weeks.

    Effect of the ferrihydrite. Ferrihydrite properties affected roots and aerial parts biomass

    production, and roots/aerial parts ratio (Table 3). These three parameters were higher for

    ferrihydrite I than ferrihydrite II treatments except for the lowest P supply.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 21

    Table 3. Influence of ferrihydrite properties and P nutrition on roots and aerial parts dry weight

    after 12 weeks plant growth. P1= 6.6 (ig P m"2 ; P2= 24.8 |ig P m"2 ; P3= 33.0 |ig P m"2 ; P4= 66.0

    (lg P m"2; Aerial parts: leaves + shoot + spikes.

    Cultivar P Dry weight (g) Roots / Aerial parts

    Ferrihydrite I Ferrihydrite II Ferrihydrite

    Roots Aerial parts Roots Aerial parts I II

    Corso Pi 0.62ab

    1.83aa 0.51ab 1.37ba 0.34 a 0.37 a

    P2 4.16ab 14.25aa

    1.10bb

    5.51ba

    0.29a

    0.20b

    P3 9.92ab

    34.16aa 3.57bb

    17.25ba

    0.29a 0.21b

    P4 17.1ab

    76.15aa 8.75bb 58.01 ba 0.23 a 0.15b

    Sikuani Pi 1.13aa 1.64aa 0.94aa 1.28ba 0.69a 0.73a

    P2 7.98aa ll.llab 2.52ba 5.73ba 0.72 a 0.44 b

    P3 16.56aa 29.78ab

    6.03ba 13.33bb 0.56a 0.45 b

    P4 28.34aa 71.04ab 15.13ba 52.32bb

    0.40a 0.29b

    Dry weight: within the same row and the same parameter (roots, aerial parts, roots/aerial parts

    ratio) mean values followed by the same first letter are not statistically different at a

    probability level a = 0.05. Within the same column and the same P treatment mean values

    followed by the same second letter are not statistically different at a probability level a = 0.05.

    n = 6.

    Ratio roots/aerial parts: within the same row mean values followed by the same letter are not

    statistically different at a probability level a = 0.05. n = 6.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 22

    Effect ofthe maize cultivar. Differences between the two cultivars were observed in terms

    of total biomass production and root-aerial part ratio. Aerial parts production was higher

    for the cultivar Corso while total biomass and roots production, and the ratio root/aerial

    part were higher for the cultivar Sikuani. The larger root system for Sikuani than for

    Corso might contribute to the better adaptation of Sikuani to low P availability, through a

    larger occupation of soil. The vegetative development of the cultivar Sikuani was much

    slower than that of the cultivar Corso (Figure 1). After 12 weeks of growth no spikes

    were present for Sikuani, treatment P4, while for Corso these vegetative organs already

    represented 44% of the dry weight of the aerial parts in the ferrihydrite II treatment. This

    phenomenon has to be seen as a specific variety property.

    P acquisition and P concentration ofplants.

    Effect of P supply. P content and P concentration of plants increased with increasing P

    supply (Table 4; Table 5 A-D). For the four distinct levels of P supply, P concentration in

    the plant tissues was below the critical value (3 mg P g dry weight) reported for maize

    (Reuter et Robinson, 1997).

    Effect of the ferrihydrite. P concentration and uptake in plant were higher for ferrihydrite

    I than for ferrihydrite II treatments although the absolute quantities of P added per pot

    were lower in the treatment ferrihydrite I than in the treatment ferrihdrite II (Table 4;

    Table 5 A-D). These results suggest that ferrihydrite properties, porosity and specific

    surface area, significantly affect P acquisition by both maize cultivars.

    Effect of the maize cultivar. Differences between both cultivars were noticed. After 12

    weeks of plant growth P concentration in the whole plant and P acquisition was higher

    for Sikuani than for Corso (Table 4; Table 5 A-D). However, during the first 9 weeks of

    plant growth, P acquisition from ferrihydrite was higher for cultivar Corso than for

    cultivar Sikuani, in spite of the higher root development observed for Sikuani (Table 3).

    The faster vegetative development of Corso might also explain the higher P acquisition

    during the first weeks of plant growth. On the other hand the lower P requirement of

    Sikuani in the initial growth period, related to slower plant development, might partly

    explain its adaptation to low-P soils.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 23

    Plant growth (weeks)

    Figure 1. Biomass production for two maize cultivars (Corso and Sikuani) grown in the

    presence of a phosphated ferrihydrite as the sole source of P and Fe. Treatment ferrihydrite JJ,

    P input 66 tag m"2. Mean value; n = 4 ; • : roots; A : stalk (shoot + leaves); : ears (spikes);

    : male flowering time; open symbols: Corso; full symbols: Sikuani.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 24

    Table 4. Influence of ferrihydrite properties and P nutrition on P

    -2concentration in plant after 12 weeks plant growth. P]= 6.6 flgPm" ; P2=

    24.8 (ig P m"2 ; P3= 33.0 jag P m"2 ; P4= 66.0 |ig P m"2 ; mean value ± SE;

    n = 4.

    Cultivar P P concentration in total plant (mg P g" DW)

    Ferrihydrite I Ferrihydrite II

    Corso Pi 0.32 ± 0.006 0.39 ± 0.006

    P2 0.30 ± 0.006 0.29 ± 0.008

    P3 0.54 ± 0.020 0.39 ±0.012

    P4 0.73 ± 0.025 0.68 ± 0.028

    Sikuani Pi 0.30 ± 0.006 0.35 ± 0.006

    P2 0.35 ±0.010 0.37 ±0.017

    P3 0.57 ± 0.027 0.48 ± 0.025

    P4 0.84 ± 0.029 0.78 ± 0.023

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 25

    Table 5 A. Ferrihydrite I: total and isotopically exchangeable P, P in solution and P mobilized by Zea mays L.

    -2. -2Corso. Pi= 6.6 u.g P m"z ; P2= 24.8 u,g P m"z ; P3= 33.0 tig P m ; P4= 66.0 ug P m . n.d.: not detected.

    P Plant P P P P P P

    growth remaining on in mobilized exchangeable non-exchangeable exchangeable

    ferrihydrite solution by plant in 1 week (E(t)) in 1 week (E(t)) in 1 week (E(t))

    (weeks) (ig P m"2) (% P total)

    p2 3 24.2aA

    0.007aA

    0.6c

    9.5aA

    14.7aA

    39.4aA

    6 23.2b

    0.001aA

    1.3b

    7.9b

    15.2a

    34.3b

    9 21.7c

    n.d. 1.7a

    7.2c

    14.5a

    33.2b

    12 21.5cB

    n.d. 1.8a

    6.7cB

    17.8aA

    31.3cB

    Control 3 24.7A

    0.015A

    - 9.9A

    14.8A

    40.1A

    Control 12 24.4A

    0.008A

    - 8.9A

    15.5A

    36.5A

    p3 3 30.9aA

    0.037aB

    1.3c

    15.8aA

    15.1aA

    51.1aA

    6 27.9b

    0.021b

    3.9b

    12.0b

    15.9a

    42.9b

    9 24.4c

    0.008"

    7.4a

    9.0c

    15.5a

    36.6c

    12 23.6cB

    0.001cB

    7.8a

    7.8cB

    15.8aA

    33.1cB

    Control 3 32.5A

    0.076A

    - 16.9A

    15.6A

    52.0A

    Control 12

    3

    31.8A

    0.045A

    - 16.6A

    15.2A

    52.2A

    P4 56.9aA

    0.215aB

    5.4c

    35.9aA 21.0aA 63.1 aA

    6 48.3b

    0.023b 14.8" 28.4 b 19.8 a 58.9 b

    9 40.9c

    0.007c

    22.5a

    21.3c

    19.6a

    52.0c

    12 40.3cB

    0.005cB

    22.6a

    19.6cB

    20.7aA

    48.7cB

    Control 3 57.8A

    7.524A

    - 36.5A

    21.0A

    63.1A

    Control 12 55.5A

    5.973A

    - 36.7A

    18.8A

    66.1A

    Within the same P treatment and the same column, mean values followed by the same small letter are not

    statistically different at a probability level a = 0.05 ; Within the same P treatment, the same column and the

    same sampling time, mean values followed by the same capital letter are not statistically different at a

    probability level a = 0.05

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 26

    Table 5 B. Ferrihydrite I: total and isotopically exchangeable P, P in solution and P mobilized by Zea mays L.

    -2Sikuani. Pi= 6.6 (Xg P m"z ; P2= 24.8 (ig P m'z ; P3= 33.0 Lig P m"z ; P4= 66.0 Lig P m . n.d.: not detected.

    Plant P P P P P P

    growth remaining on in mobilized exchangeable non-exchangeable exchangeable

    ferrihydrite solution by plant in 1 week (E(t)) in 1 week (E(t)) in 1 week (E(t))

    (weeks) (LigPrn"2) (% P total)

    p2 3 24.5aA

    0.009aA

    0.5b

    9.8aA

    14.7aA

    40.2aA

    6 23.6a

    0.002a

    0.8b

    8.3b

    15.3a

    35.2b

    9 21.8" n.d. 1.6 a 7.6 b 14.2 a 35.2 b

    12 21.1bB

    n.d. 2.2a

    6.2cB

    14.9aA

    29.3cB

    Control 3 24.7A

    0.015A

    - 9.9A

    14.8A

    40.1A

    Control 12 24.4B

    0.008A

    - 8.9A

    15.5A

    14.6aA

    36.5A

    p3 3 31.4aA

    0.045aB

    1.0d

    16.8aA

    53.4aA

    6 29.4b

    0.030b

    2.9c

    12.9b

    16.5a

    44.0b

    9 24.8c

    0.011c

    6.6b

    9.5c

    15.3a

    38.5c

    12 22.6dB 0.001cB 8.8 a 6.5 dB 16.1aA 28.6 dB

    Control 3 32.5A

    0.076A

    - 16.9A

    15.6A

    52.0A

    Control 12 31.8A

    0.045A

    - 16.6A

    15.2A

    52.2A

    p4 3 57.0aA

    0.306aB

    4.1d 35.9aA 21.1aA 63.0 aA

    6 53.6" 0.107 b 9.9 c 32.2 b 21.4 a 60.1 b

    9 40.5c

    0.006c

    23.2b

    20.6c

    19.9a

    50.9c

    12 36.7dB

    n.d. 27.4a

    14.9dB

    21.8aA

    40.6dB

    Control 3 57.8A

    7.524A

    - 36.5A 21.0A 63.1 A

    Control 12 55.5A

    5.973A

    - 36.7A

    18.8A

    66.1A

    Explanation for the small and capital letters following the mean values see Table 5 A.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 27

    Table 5 C. Ferrihydrite II: total and isotopically exchangeable P, P in solution and P mobilized by Zea mays L.

    -2 -2Corso. Pi= 6.6 fig P m ; P2= 24.8 ixg P m"z ; P3= 33.0 tig P m"z ; P4= 66.0 (ig P m . n.d.: not detected

    Plant P P P P P P

    growth remaining on in mobilized exchangeable non-exchangeable exchangeable

    f h A tsolution by plant in 1 week (E(t)) in 1 week (E(t)) in 1 week (E(t))

    (weeks) (jig P m"2) {% P total)

    p2 3 24.1aA

    0.005aA

    0.2a

    7.5aA

    16.7bA

    30.9aA

    6 24.1a

    n.d. 0.3a

    1.3b

    22.8a

    5.4b

    9 23.8a

    n.d. 0.3a

    1.1b

    22.7a

    4.6b

    12 23.7aA

    n.d. 0.3a

    0.9bA

    22.8aA

    3.9bA

    Control 3 24.5A

    0.012A

    - 7.6A

    16.9A 31.0A

    Control 12

    3

    24.3A

    0.003A

    - 1.7A

    22.6A

    6.2A

    p3 31.7aA

    0.029aB

    0.4c

    14.3aA

    17.4bA

    45.1aA

    6 31.0a 0.008b 0.9" 12.5 a 18.5" 40.3 a

    9 30.4a

    n.d. 1.4a

    7.9b

    22.5a

    25.9b

    12 30.3aA

    n.d. 1.5a

    6.9bA

    23.3aA

    22.9bA

    Control 3 32.0A

    0.091A

    - 14.2A

    17.8A

    44.4A

    Control 12 31.5A

    0.062A

    - 8.6A

    22.9A

    27.3A

    p4 3 63.7aA

    0.128aB

    1.6d

    36.2aA

    27.5cA

    56.8aA

    6 60.0b

    0.012b

    5.2c

    27.0b

    33.0b

    45.0b

    9 57.0c

    n.d. 7.4b

    16.7c

    40.3a

    29.3c

    12 56.1cB

    n.d. 8.1a

    13.7dB

    42.4aA

    24.5dB

    Control 3 64.4A

    3.866A

    - 36.7A

    27.7A

    23.6B

    Control 12 63.0A

    0.340A

    - 20.3A

    42.7A

    32.2A

    Explanation for the small and capital letters following mean values see Table 5 A.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 28

    Table 5 D. Ferrihydrite II: total and isotopically exchangeable P, P in solution and P mobilized by Zea mays L.

    Sikuani. Pj= 6.6 jig P m~z ; P2= 24.8 jig P rnz

    ; P3= 33.0 \Lg P m"z ; P4= 66.0 ug P m". n.d.: not detected.

    P Plant P P P P P P

    growth remaining on in mobilized exchangeable non-exchangeable exchangeable

    ferrihydrite solution by plant in 1 week (E(t)) in 1 week (E(t)) in 1 week (E(t))

    (weeks) (ug P ml) {% P total)

    P2 3 24.1aA 0.007aA 0.2b 8.2aA 15.9bA 33.9aA

    6 24.0a n.d. 0.3b 1.6" 22.5a 6.6"

    9 23.8a n.d. 0.3b 1.3b 22.5a 5.4b

    12 23.6aA n.d. 0.6a 0.9 bB 22.7aA 3.6bA

    Control 3 24.5A 0.012A - 7.6A 16.9A 31.0A

    Control 12 24.3A

    31.8aA

    0.003A

    - 1.7A 22.6 A 6.2 A

    P3 3 0.034aB 0.3c 14.4aA 17.4bA 45.3 aA

    6 31.2a 0.010b 0.8 b 12.8a 18.4b 40.9"

    9 30.5a n.d. 1.4a 8.1" 22.5a 26.5c

    12 30.1aA n.d. 1.7a 6.3 bA 23.8 aA 21.0dA

    Control 3 32.0A 0.091 A - 14.2 A 17.8 A 44.4 A

    Control 12 31.5A 0.062 A - 8.6 A 22.9 A 27.3 A

    P4 3 64.1aA 0.301aB 0.8 d 34.9 aA 29.1 dA 54.5aA

    6 60.4b

    0.048bB

    3.9C 24.9b

    35.5c 41.2b

    9 56.4c n.d. 7.4b 17.5c 38.9b 31.Ie

    12 54.6cB n.d. 9.5a 11.6dB 43.0aA 22.5 dB

    Control 3 64.4A 3.866A - 36.7 A 27.7 A 23.6B

    Control 12 63.0A

    0.340A

    - 20.3A

    42.7A

    32.2A

    Explanation for the small and capital letters following mean values see Table 5 A.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 29

    Fe acquisition and concentration by plants.

    Effect of P supply. Symptoms of Fe deficiency were visible within each P treatments.

    Except for the highest P supply (P4= 66.0T0"3 (j,g P m"2 ferrihydrite), P deficiency

    symptoms strongly dominated Fe deficiency symptoms on the leaves. Fe deficiency

    symptoms were observed as bright yellow interveinal chlorosis (striping) on entire length

    of new leaves. Fe concentration in the aerial parts increased with increasing P supply up

    to a maximum and then decreased (Figure 2). Since the total amount of Fe in the aerial

    parts continuously increased with increasing P supply (Figure 3), the lower Fe

    concentration observed at the highest rate of P application was related to higher increase

    in dry matter.

    Effect of the ferrihydrite. The Fe content of maize was higher with the ferrihydrite I than

    with the ferrihydrite II (Figure 3). The larger root system within the ferrihydrite I than the

    ferrihydrite II treatments might account for this difference. However, the ratio of Fe

    content in the aerial parts to the root biomass was lower for ferrihydrite I than ferrihydrite

    II treatments (Figure 4). This suggests that maize roots were more efficient in acquiring

    Fe from the ferrihydrite II than from ferrihydrite I. This can be explained by the highest

    porosity and specific surface of the ferrihydrite II.

    Effect of the maize cultivar. Fe concentration and content in the aerial parts was higher in

    Sikuani than in Corso (Figure 2 and Figure 3). As reported by Brown (1967) Fe uptake in

    maize is genetically controlled. The higher Fe content in the aerial parts of Sikuani than

    of Corso might be explained by the larger root system for Sikuani than for Corso. Since

    the ratio Fe content in the aerial parts/root biomass was lower for Sikuani than for Corso

    (Figure 4), the higher content in the aerial parts in Sikuani than in Corso did not appear to

    be related to a more efficient Fe acquisition mechanism in Sikuani. The difference

    between both cultivars could also be due to a higher efficiency in Fe transport from roots

    to shoot in Sikuani.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 30

    0.28

    H

    '- ^—sC3ft £73 A•F-N u +^

    QJ b

    C« a

    aA^N

    cC«

    o i-•FN 0J

    «Jcd

    ^^r^ diu

    o>

    o U.S 0£

    0.24 -

    0.20

    0.16 -

    0.12

    0.08

    Ferrihydrite I Ferrihydrite II

    0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60

    -2

    P treatment (jig P m )

    Figure 2. Relation between the P inputs and the Fe concentration in the aerial parts for two

    maize cultivars (Corso and Sikuani) grown for 12 weeks in the presence of a phosphated

    ferrihydrite as the sole source of P and Fe. Pi= 6.6 fig P m"2 ; P2= 24.8 fig P m"2 ; P3= 33.0 fig P

    m"2 ; P4= 66.0 fig P m"2 ; mean value ± SE ; n = 4 ; O : Corso; À : Sikuani.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 31

    14

    12

    10 -

    ft

    a ft

    es s

    ft

    2 -

    0

    Ferrihydrite I 4 Ferrihydrite II

    n i i i

    0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60

    -2

    P treatment (|Lig P m )

    Figure 3. Relation between the P inputs and the Fe uptake in the aerial parts for two maize

    cultivars (Corso and Sikuani) grown for 12 weeks in the presence of a phosphated ferrihydrite

    as the sole source of P and Fe. P1= 6.6 fig P m"2 ; P2= 24.8 fig P m"2 ; P3= 33.0 fig P m"2 ; P4=

    66.0 fig P m~2 ; mean value ± SE ; n = 4 ; O : Corso; A : Sikuani.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 32

    1.0

    0.8 -

    ucd /^

    ft £CO Q;-

    o0.6

    «s o

    e^'•pN 1

    0>OX)

    0.4^-»

    ft DiD

    =5 S

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 33

    Changes in some physico chemical properties of the mineral substrate

    pH value in solution

    Plant growth resulted in an increase in pH values (Figure 5). This was related to the

    uptake of nitrate as the sole source of nitrogen during plant growth which led to the

    release of HCO3" or OH" into the solution to maintain pH equilibrium in plant tissue

    (Marschner, 1995b; Nye, 1986). Increase of pH values were higher for Sikuani than for

    Corso. These increases were positively correlated for both cultivars to their root biomass

    production. In the treatments incubated without plant the higher pH values for

    ferrihydrite II than for ferrihydrite I, observed in particular for P4, reflected the higher

    quantity of sorbed P on ferrihydrite II and was related to a higher release of OH group

    from the surface of the oxide.

    Evolution ofP in the substrate during plant growth.

    Inorganic P in the solution. The concentration of inorganic P (Pi) in the solution

    decreased very rapidly with plant growth, due to plant P uptake (Table 5 A-D). As shown

    by the control treatment, Pi sorption onto the ferrihydrite during the experiment was

    relatively low for ferrihydrite I, but high for ferrihydrite II treatments. The high specific

    surface and porosity and therefore the higher number of sorption sites on ferrihydrite II

    explain this observation. This in turn is coherent with the lower P acquisition and total

    biomass production of both maize cultivars with the ferrihydrite II than with the

    ferrihydrite I (Table 3). No significant differences were measured between total P and Pi

    in the solution (data not shown).

    P isotopically exchangeable on the ferrihydrite. The amount of P isotopically

    exchangeable within one week (E 1 week) remained constant in the presence of ferrihydrite

    I without plants during the 12 weeks of incubation while it decreased in the presence of

    both maize cultivars (Table 5A and B, Figure 6). In the presence of the ferrihydrite I, the

    amount of P taken up by maize during the entire growth period is totally accounted for by

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 34

    the changes in P remaining in the solution and in E i week (Figure 7, Table 5 A-B). The

    pool of P non-exchangeable within one week (E >j week) did not change during the 12

    weeks of the plant growth. This suggests that in the presence of ferrihydrite I the main

    sources of P for both maize cultivars were the P in the solution and the P isotopically

    exchangeable within a week.

    Because of its higher specific surface and porosity, E i wee)j decreased steadily in the

    presence of ferrihydrite II without plant during the 12 week of incubation while E >i week

    increased (Table 5 C-D). In the presence of maize, E i week decreased more rapidly than

    in the samples incubated with the ferrihydrite II without plant (Tab 5 C-D). As for the

    experiment with the ferrihydrite I, a tight relation was observed between the quantity of P

    remaining in the solution plus E i week and the quantity of P taken up by the plant of the

    one side in the cultivated treatments, and the quantity of P remaining in the solution plus

    E i week in the incubated sample on the other side. This suggests that also in the presence

    of ferrihydrite II the main sources of P for both maize cultivars were the P in the solution

    and the P isotopically exchangeable within a week.

    The transfer of P ions into the pool of P non exchangeable in one week in the presence of

    the ferrihydrite II explained also the lower P acquisition and total biomass production by

    both maize cultivars grown in the presence of this mineral than when grown in the

    presence of the ferrihydrite I. Differences between both cultivars in term of P mobilized

    by plants and P exchangeable within one week (Table 5 A-D) were well related with the

    biomass production of both cultivars (Table 3).

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 35

    8.2

    4 S 8.0ft ©

    © CO

    « 'S0>

    u

    äCO

    aft

    o7.8

    In

    o

    57.6

    ©

    7.4

    7.2

    Ferrihydrite I Ferrihydrite II 4

    20 40 60 20 40 60

    -2

    P treatments (jug P m )

    Figure 5. Effect of plant growth on the pH value in the solution for two maize cultivars (Corso

    and Sikuani) grown for 12 weeks in the presence of a phosphated ferrihydrite as the sole source of

    P and Fe P1= 6.6 fig P m"2 ; P2= 24.8 fig P m"2 ; P3= 33.0 fig P m"2 ; P4= 66.0 fig P m2

    ; mean

    value ± SE ; n = 4 ; O : Corso 12 weeks; A : Sikuani 12 weeks; D : Control t = 0; : control 12

    weeks.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 36

    Isotopic exchange time (days)

    Figure 6. Changes in the isotopically exchangeable P content of the ferrihydrite I and II

    after 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks of plant growth (maize cultivar Corso) as compared to the

    isotopically exchangeable P content of the same substrate incubated without plant for 0

    and 12 weeks. Treatment P4 = 66.0 fig P m"2 ; mean value ± SE ; n = 4 ; O: 3 weeks

    growth; A: 6 weeks growth; V: 9 weeks growth; O: 12 weeks growth; D: control t =

    0; : control 12 weeks.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 37

    a

    +

    C

    to

    s

    vi

    Ph r*

    m

    40

    30

    + S? &H 20I WD

    10

    0

    Ferrihydrite I

    0

    r =0.999

    y = 0.92x + 1.28

    Ferrihydrite II

    P, ir r = 0.978

    y = 0.91x + 1.22

    20 40

    Control: P

    0 20 40

    + Pi.e. (t = 1 week) solution

    (|Lig P m"2)

    Figure 7. Relation between the amount of P isotopically exchangeable within a week (Eiweek) and the P

    remaining in the solution in the substrate incubated without plant (axis X), and the amount of P taken

    up by the plant plus the amount of P remaining in the solution and E i week after plant growth (axis Y).

    Pi= 6.6 fig P m"2 ; P2= 24.8 fig P m"2 ; P3= 33.0 fig P nf2 ; P4= 66.0 fig P m"2 ; mean value ± SE ; n =

    4.#: Corso; A: Sikuani; open symbols: 3 weeks ; full symbols: 12 weeks.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 38

    Evolution ofP sorbed on ferrihydrite fractions adhering and non-adhering to the roots.

    The total P content of the ferrihydrite of the substrate adhering to the roots was always

    lower than in the fraction of ferrihydrite non-adhering to the roots (Table 6 A-B). The

    concentration of P ions in solution during the isotopic exchange kinetic (Cp), the ratio

    rl/R and the amount of P exchangeable within 1 min (E i mjn) were also affected by the

    adherence of the ferrihydrite to the roots. In the beginning, the plant took up P adsorbed

    on oxides particles in the vicinity of the roots. After 3 weeks of plant growth, within both

    ferrihydrite treatments the Cp, E \ ^n and rl/R were lower in the fraction of ferrihydrite

    adhering to the roots than in the one non-adhering to the roots. A lower ratio rl/R is

    related to a higher P sorption capacity (Fardeau, 1993). At the end of the experiment, the

    values of the Cp and E i mjn were still lower, but the ratio rl/R higher, in the fraction of

    ferrihydrite adhering to the roots than in the non-adhering fraction. According to Fardeau

    (1993) the stronger decrease of water soluble P in the fraction of ferrihydrite adhering to

    the roots should have resulted in an decrease of the ratio rl/R, i.e. to an increase of the P

    sorption capacity, rather than in an increase in rl/R which denotes a decrease in the P

    sorption capacity. This points out to significant modifications in the P chemistry in the

    root vicinity after 12 weeks of plant growth. These could be due to a change in the oxide

    sorption properties related either to changes in the ferrihydrite porosity following root

    colonisation, and/or to the adsorption of organic compounds at its surface following root

    exudation. Indeed phosphate and organic compounds can compete for the same

    adsorption sites on the iron oxides (Staunton and Leprince, 1996).

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 39

    Table 6 A. Adhering- non-adhering ferrihydrite I to the roots by Zea mays L Corso and Sikuani. ; P2= 24.8 fig P

    m"2 ; P3= 33.0 fig P m"2 ; P4= 66.0 fig P nf2; Cp: P concentration in solution within the isotopic exchange

    kinetic; R: the introduced amount of radioactivity at time 0; rl: the amount of radioactivity remaining in the

    solution after 1 minute of isotopic exchange; E \ ^^ amount of P adsorbed on the oxide exchangeable within 1

    min; Adh.: ferrihydrite adhering to the roots; Non-adh.: ferrihydrite non-adhering to the roots.

    P Cultivar Sampling P total Cp in solution rl/R E i mm

    (weeks) OigPrn2) (mgPl"1) (figPrn"2)

    Adh. Non-adh. Adh. Non-adh. Adh. Non-adh. Adh. Non-adh.

    P2 Corso 3 23.988aa 24.247aa 0.023ba 0.031aa 0.117bb 0.142aa 0.114aa 0.126aa

    12 20.321bb 21.809ab 0.002ab 0.002ab 0.236aa 0.110bb 0.005bb 0.011ab

    Sikuani 3 24.213aa

    24.602aa 0.028ba 0.039aa 0.138bb 0.161aa 0.117ba 0.140aa

    12 19.922bb 21.746ab 0.003ab 0.002ab 0.209aa 0.092bb 0.008ab 0.013 ab

    Control 12 - 24.418 - 0.042 - 0.233 - 0.104

    p3 Corso 3 30.207aa 30.968aa 0.050ba 0.064aa 0.212bb 0.256aa 0.136aa 0.145aa

    12 23.033bb 25.791 ab 0.006bb 0.012ab 0.350aa 0.213bb 0.010bb 0.033ab

    Sikuani 3 30.970aa 31.632aa 0.066aa 0.071aa 0.227bb 0.282aa 0.168aa 0.146aa

    12 22.418bb 24.012ab 0.003ab 0.006ab 0.329aa 0.190bb 0.005bb 0.018ab

    Control 12 - 31.241 - 0.098 - 0.471 - 0.120

    p4 Corso 3 56.110ba 57.268aa 0.306ba 0.421aa 0.435bb 0.480aa 0.389ba 0.507aa

    12 39.788bb 44.180ab 0.020bb 0.030ab 0.479aa 0.269bb 0.024bb 0.065ab

    Sikuani 3 58.247ba 59.732aa 0.455ba 0.619aa 0.467ba 0.512aa 0.564ba 0.699aa

    12 35.328bb 40.690ab 0.010bb 0.019ab 0.483 aa 0.240bb 0.012bb 0.046ab

    Control 12 - 55.526 - 0.663 - 0.609 - 0.630

    Explanation for the letters following the mean values see Table 6 B.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 40

    Table 6 B. Adhering- non-adhering ferrihydrite II to the roots by Zea mays L Corso and Sikuani.

    Explanation on determined parameters (Cp; rl/R; E i,^; Adh.; Non-adh.) see Table 5 A.

    P Cultivar Sampling P total Cp in solution rl/R E i min

    (weeks) (fig P m"2) (mgPF1) (fig P rn 2)

    Adh. Non-adh. Adh. Non-adh. Adh. Non-adh. Adh. Non-adh.

    P2 Corso 3 24.069aa 24.141aa 0.002aa 0.005aa 0.021bb 0.034aa 0.030ba 0.046aa

    12 22.637bb 23.827aa 0.003aa 0.003aa 0.064aa 0.028ba 0.015bb 0.034ab

    Sikuani 3 24.000aa 24.068aa 0.003aa

    0.009aa 0.019bb 0.034aa 0.050ba 0.083aa

    12 22.314bb 23.763aa 0.002aa 0.002aa 0.063 aa 0.020bb 0.010bb 0.031 ab

    Control 12 - 24.307 - 0.010 - 0.029 - 0.108

    P3 Corso 3 31.420aa 31.762aa 0.012ba 0.027aa 0.040bb 0.065aa 0.094ba 0.131aa

    12 29.072bb 30.560ab 0.011 aa 0.013ab 0.179aa 0.050bb 0.019bb 0.082ab

    Sikuani 3 31.456aa 31.852aa 0.014ba 0.038aa 0.045bb 0.073 aa 0.098ba 0.164aa

    12 28.803bb 30.504ab 0.008aa 0.011 ab 0.155aa 0.036bb 0.016bb 0.096ab

    Control 12 - 31.565 - 0.040 - 0.079 - 0.159

    P4 Corso 3 61.367ba 63.848aa 0.162ba 0.295aa 0.220bb 0.251aa 0.232ba 0.370aa

    12 54.633bb 58.550ab 0.064bb 0.080ab 0.413aa 0.181 bb 0.049bb 0.139ab

    Sikuani 3 61.780ba 64.153aa 0.201 ba 0.317aa 0.235bb 0.288aa 0.269ba 0.346aa

    12 53.213bb 56.837ab 0.027bb 0.046ab 0.382aa 0.150bb 0.022bb 0.096ab

    Control 12 - 63.042 - 0.616 - 0.424 - 0.457

    Within the same P treatment, the same cultivar, the same sampling time and the same parameter (P total, Cp in

    solution, rl/R and E \ m,n) mean values followed by the same first letter are not statistically different at a

    probability level a = 0.05; Within the same P treatment, the same cultivar, the same parameter and the sameferrihydrite fraction mean values followed by the same second letter are not statistically different at a probabilitylevel a = 0.05; n = 4

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 41

    Modification of the oxalate-extractable Fe (Fe0) content offerrihydrite. The amount of

    oxalate-extractable Fe (Fe0) decreased in the ferrihydrite I and II during plant growth,

    while Fe0 remained constant in the incubation experiments without plants (Figure 8).

    After 12 weeks of plant growth this decrease was higher for ferrihydrite II than for

    ferrihydrite I, and higher by Sikuani than by Corso. Fe0 decreased much more in the

    fraction adhering to the roots than in non-adhering fraction. Fe0 decrease was stronger at

    high P supply and related high plant and root development. Dithionite-citrate-

    bicarbonate-extractable Fe (Fed) (Mehra and Jackson, 1960) remained constant for both

    ferrihydrites during the entire experiment. The Feo/Fed value decreased during plant

    growth.

    The decrease of oxalate-extractable Fe (Fe0) might result from the crystallisation of the

    ferrihydrite during plant growth, and/or from a mobilisation of Fe0 by the plant. A

    positive correlation existed between the uptake of Fe in the aerial parts and the decrease

    of oxalate-extractable Fe (Fe0) (Figure 9). However, and even without any determination

    of the Fe content in roots, the difference between the decrease of Fe0 and the uptake of P

    by the plant is too high to be only explained by a plant mobilization.

    Modification of the specific surface area (SSA) and of the porosity of the ferrihydrites.

    With the presence of plants the SSA of both ferrihydrites decreased during the entire

    experiment, while for the control treatments the SSA remained constant (Figure 10). The

    decrease of the SSA of the fraction of ferrihydrite adhering to the roots was much higher

    than that of the fraction of ferrihydrite non-adhering to the roots. Furthermore, increasing

    concentration of P in the system and related higher plant and root development also

    enhanced this decrease.

    The decrease of the specific surface area of both ferrihydrites during plant growth was

    closely related to the decrease of the porosity of the ferrihydrite aggregates (Figure 11).

    The decrease of the porosity was higher for Sikuani than for Corso, and was higher for

    the fraction of ferrihydrite adhering to the roots.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 42

    The decrease in SSA and porosity could be related to solubilization/precipitation cycles

    due to varying redox conditions. Although maize is classified as a strategy II plant in Fe

    acquisition (Römheld and Marschner, 1986), which means that maize roots have a low

    reducing capacity, saturation with water, the presence of organic exudates and iron

    reducing micro-organisms can result in the apparition of reducing conditions in the

    vicinity of the roots (de Willigen and van Noordjwijk, 1984; Uren, 1984; Uren and

    Reisenauer 1988; Munch and Ottow, 1982; Fischer, 1988). Adsorption of high molecular

    weight compounds root exudates at the surface or/and in the aggregates of ferrihydrite

    might also reduce the porosity and the specific surface area.

    Iron oxide XRD determination. At the end of the experiment for both 2-lines ferrihydrites

    adhering and non-adhering to the roots, no Fe-(hydr)oxide other than ferrihydrite was

    detected (data not shown). However it is important to notice that the sensitivity of the

    XRD method is relatively low. As shown by Schwertmann and Murad (1983) storage of

    ferrihydrite in aqueous suspension and pH changes can result in the formation of goethite

    and hematite. Nevertheless the presence of phosphate retards the transformation of

    ferrihydrite into crystalline products (Paige et al., 1997). Observed reduction in porosity,

    SSA and Fe0 could be explained by the apparition of a more crystallized form of iron

    oxide such as hematite or goethite.

    Modification of the organic matter content of ferrihydrite during plant growth.

    The content of organic matter in ferrihydrite increased during plant growth when

    compared to the control treatment without plant (Table 7). The sorption of organic

    compounds was higher on ferrihydrite II than on ferrihydrite I. The concentration of

    organic C was higher in the fraction of ferrihydrite adhering to the roots than in the non-

    adhering fraction. The concentration of organic C in the fraction of ferrihydrite both

    adhering and non-adhering to the roots was higher for Sikuani than for Corso. These

    results support the suggested influence of adsorbed organic compounds on the observed

    (i) decrease of the ferrihydrite porosity on the fraction adhering to the roots, and (ii)

    decreased P sorption capacity on the fraction of ferrihydrite adhering to the roots.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 43

    S

    to

    q? 2.0

    2.0 -Pl P2P3 p4

    Pl P2P, p41.5 -

    Sikuani

    Ferrihydrite I

    1.0 -

    0.5 -

    on

    Sikuani TÄ

    Ferrihydrite II

    1.5

    1.0 -

    0.5 -

    0.0

    pi P2P,

    Corso

    Ferrihydrite I

    P, P2 F

    Corso

    Ferrihydrite II

    0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60

    P treatment ([ig P m )

    Figure 8. Influence of the presence of plant on the oxalate-extractable Fe (Fe0). Pi= 6.6

    fig P m"2 ; P2= 24.8 fig P m"2 ; P3= 33.0 fig P m"2 ; P4= 66.0 fig P m"2 ; mean value ± SE ; n

    = A.%: ferrihydrite adhering to the roots; : ferrihydrite non-adhering to the roots; open

    symbols: 3 weeks; full symbols: 12 weeks; : Control 12 weeks.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 44

    4.0 -

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 45

    DX

    c*

    173 -

    172

    <

    in

    ^ 111Ua

    1 "O'«

    =3t/2

    S 169

    ftCZ3

    168

    Ferrihydrite I Ferrihydrite II- 320

    310

    - 300

    - 290

    280

    270

    WD

    fS

    es

    u

    *-

    20 40 60 20 40 60

    P treatment (j^g P m )

    Figure 10. Modification of the specific surface area (SSA) after 12 weeks plant growth. Pi= 6.6

    fig P m"2 ; P2= 24.8 fig P m"2 ; P3= 33.0 fig P m"2 ; P4= 66.0 fig P m"2. mean value ± SE ; n = 3.

    • : Corso; A: Sikuani; B : Control; full symbols: ferrihydrite fraction non-adhering to roots;

    open symbols: ferrihydrite fraction adhering to roots.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 46

    45.2

    44.8

    .1? 44 4Ou

    ©

    44.0 -

    43.6

    Ferrihydrite -. FerrihydriteII

    - 94.0

    97.0

    91.0 £©U

    ©

    88.0

    i n ' n n i ' i ' i '

    167 169 171 173 270 290 310 330

    Specific surface area (SSA) (m g" )

    85.0

    Figure 11. Change of the ferrihydrite porosity related to the specific surface area

    (SSA) after 12 weeks plant growth. P1= 6.6 fig P m"2 ; P2= 24.8 fig P m"2 ; P3= 33.0

    fig P m"2 ; P4= 66.0 fig P m"2; mean value ± SE ; n = 3. On fig 10 : ?u P2, P3, P4 for

    A; •: Corso; A: Sikuani; : Control; full symbols: ferrihydrite fraction non-

    adhering to roots; open symbols: ferrihydrite fraction adhering to roots.

  • Chapter I : P acquisition by maize in sand-ferrihydrite-P systems - 47

    Table 7. Influence of 12 weeks plant growth and P supply on organic matter in ferrihydrite for

    Zea mays L. Corso and Sikuani. P2= 24.8 fig P nf2 ; P3= 33.0 fig P m"2 ; P4= 66.0 |ig P m"2; Adh

    oxide adhering to the roots; Non-adh.: oxide non-adhering to the roots, mean value ± SE; n = 4.

    Cultivar Organic matter content on ferrihydrite (fig C m"2)

    Ferrihydrite I Ferrihydrite II

    Adh. Non-adh. Adh. Non-adh.

    p2 Corso 6.43 ±0.342 1.39 ±0.220 7.52 ± 0.577 1.10 ±0.211

    Sikuani 12.26 ±0.708 1.68 ±0.244 9.59 ±0.612 1.45 ±0.