23
 Rep. Richard Hanna (NY-24)

Richard Hanna Clipbook

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 1/23

 Rep. Richard Hanna (NY-24)

Page 2: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 2/23

 Notable Headlines

Read His Lips: GOP Lawmaker Calls Party's No-New-Taxes Stand "Unrealistic" [The National Journal,

7/05/2011]

Hanna owes us better on debt ceiling [The Daily Star, Editorial, 7/29/11]

Hanna’s vote on health law disappointing [auburnpub.com, Editorial, 1/23/11]

Editorials

Citizen: Hanna Votes to Repeal Health Care After Saying He Would Not

In January 2011, The Citizen’s editorial board called Hanna’s vote to repeal the health care reform law“disappointing” and “discouraging.” Hanna voted to repeal the legislation after saying during hiscampaign that he would not vote to repeal it unless he was convinced that there was a true effort to fix theexisting plan. He had admitted the bill was flawed but believed there were features that could be builtupon. The Citizen felt like he went back on that promise. [auburnpub.com, Editorial, 1/23/11]

Daily Star Criticized Hanna for Being “Swept Along” with the GOP Tide

In July 2011, the Daily Star criticized Hanna for professing not to be an ideologue, but allowing himself to be “swept along with the tide, being a reliable vote for Boehner, and not putting up much of a fuss.”The Star asked Hanna to start taking his responsibility more seriously. [The Daily Star, Editorial, 7/29/11]

Budget Issues

Introduced Jobs Legislation in the House

In November 2011, Hanna introduced the American Growth, Recovery, Empowerment, andEntrepreneurship Act that would encourage research and development, provide tax incentives for veteranswho wanted to start a business, and regulatory relief for small businesses.

Hanna worked with Rep. Keating of Massachusetts to introduce the bill. Hanna said, “My goal is to find

opportunities to move things ahead and this is one I saw. I read it, watched them announce it and got ahold of it that night and read through it. I introduced it the next morning.” [auburnpub.com, 11/27/11]

Disappointed by “Super Committee” Failure

In November 2011, Hanna said he was disappointed by the “Super Committee’s” failure to reach anagreement on deficit reduction.

2

Page 3: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 3/23

Hanna said, “It’s disappointing. When you realize they did it because 535 people can’t get an agreementand so they boil it down in an effort to move forward on all of these very important issues. They boil itdown to 12 people — six from each side — and they fail. I know they have worked hundreds of hours. Iknow three of these guys personally. They are together all the time and to see this, it’s discouraging. Welook as though we are incapable of governing ourselves...But when one side is adamant about taxes and

the other side is adamant that they’re included, it’s very tough. I know that our side offered changes in thetax code, but they didn’t want to raise rates. If I were in charge, I would have diffused it and allowed for certain people to pay more. I don’t know how we get there from here... The truth is the middle class is introuble and they need the help first. They’re the people who spend the money.” [The Citizen, 11/24/11]

Hanna: Government Can Provide Short-Term Economic Boost

In October 2011, Hanna acknowledged that government could provide businesses with a short-term boost, but said private sector growth was essential for long-term success.

Hanna said, “We’ve seen that the government can provide that shot of adrenaline in short term for 

 businesses, but really what we want to do is create an environment that fosters private business growthand makes us more globally competitive.” [uticaod.com, 11/20/11]

Voted for Final Debt Ceiling Compromise Legislation

In August 2011, Hanna voted for the final debt ceiling compromise legislation, the Budget Control Act of 2011.

The framework would cut $917 billion in spending over a decade, raise the debt limit initially by $900 billion and assign a special congressional committee, with members from the House and the Senate andappointed by congressional leadership, to find another $1.5 trillion in deficit savings by late November.

If Congress met that deadline and deficit target, or voted to send a balanced budget amendment to thestates, the debt ceiling would be raised an additional $1.5 trillion. The plan guaranteed a vote on the balanced budget amendment between October and the end of 2011.

If Congress failed to take either step, or debt savings of at least $1.2 trillion were not produced, the planallows the president to obtain a $1.2 trillion debt ceiling increase. That would trigger automatic spendingcuts across the government – including in defense and Medicare – to take effect starting in 2013. TheMedicare cuts would only affect Provider reimbursements. The legislation included no revenue increases.

The bill was passed by the full House, 269-161. [Bloomberg, 8/01/11; S 356, 8/01/11]

Voted Against Reid’s Debt Ceiling Plan

In July 2011, Hanna voted against Sen. Harry Reid’s plan to raise the debt ceiling.

Reid’s plan called for raising the debt limit by $2.4 trillion, requiring no additional debt ceiling vote untilafter the 2012 election.

3

Page 4: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 4/23

The plan included $1.2 trillion in discretionary spending cuts over 10 years, mandatory spending cuts of $100 billion, $1 trillion in savings from winding down combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and$400 billion in interest savings. The legislation included no revenue increases.

The CBO score of Reid’s plan said it would reduce the deficit by $2.2 trillion. The bill was rejected by the

full House, 173-246. [New York Times, 7/25/11; HR 2693, 7/30/11]

Voted in Favor of Boehner’s Debt Ceiling Plan

In July 2011, Hanna voted in favor of Speaker John Boehner’s plan to raise the debt ceiling.

Boehner’s plan called for an immediate debt ceiling raise of $900 billion, spending cuts of $917 billionover 10 years, and an additional debt ceiling vote in six months. The legislation contained no revenueincreases.

Under Boehner’s plan, the second debt ceiling raise was conditional on the passage of a balanced budget

amendment by both Houses of Congress and the creation of a select joint committee on deficit reduction.

The CBO score of Boehner’s plan said it would reduce the deficit by $850 billion. The bill was approved by the full house, 218-210. [ABC News, 7/29/11; S 627, 7/29/11]

Voted in Favor of Cut, Cap and Balance Plan

In July 2011, Hanna voted in favor of the Cut, Cap and Balance Act, legislation requiring deep spendingcuts, a federal spending cap and a balanced budget amendment in order to raise the federal debt ceiling.

Under Cut, Cap and Balance, discretionary spending in fiscal year 2012 would be reduced below fiscalyear 2008 levels except for Defense, Homeland Security and Veterans affairs. The plan provided auniversal spending cap after 2012. The legislation contained no revenue increases.

The bill was approved by the full House, 234-190. [New York Times, 7/21/11; HR 2560, 7/19/11]

Said Leaders Should Reach Agreement to Avoid Default

In July 2011, Hanna said, “This nation never defaulted on a nickel, and it never should…Congress should put this issue behind us before Aug. 2. I hope the president and leaders of the House and Senate reachagreement on a responsible way forward as soon as possible.”

Hanna said he supported the Cut, Cap and Balance Act as a “way to move forward with the debt limitnegotiations…I am not interested in brinkmanship. This measure – while far from perfect – is simply theonly plan on the table in writing.” [Utica Observer-Dispatch, 7/20/11]

Hanna: Debt Limit Debate “An Exciting Opportunity”

In July 2011, Hanna said the debt limit debate was “an exciting opportunity to get our country on a soundfiscal footing and I believe a Balanced Budget Amendment should be sent to the states for consideration.”[Richard Hanna for Congress, 7/15/11]

4

Page 5: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 5/23

Hanna: Republican and Democratic Positions on Debt Ceiling Talks are Unrealistic

In July 2011, Hanna said that Republicans and Democrats are playing “a game of chicken that isdangerous’ in the debt-ceiling talks, labeling his own party’s position as ‘unrealistic.”

Hanna criticized colleagues who signed the no-new-tax pledge and Republican and Democraticintransigence on tax cuts and entitlement program cuts. “Nobody wants either of those things- but frankly,the more you look at it the more you realize that both of those positions are unrealistic in our economy.”[The National Journal, 7/05/2011]

Criticized GOP Debt Ceiling Position as “Unrealistic”

On June 28, 2011, Hanna called Republican opposition to revenue increases in a debt ceiling deal“unrealistic” and criticized his colleagues’ deference to conservative activist Grover Norquist.

“[…] the Republican Party does not want to see anyone’s taxes go up. Nobody wants either of those

things but, frankly, the more you look at it, the more you realize that both of those positions are unrealisticin our economy,” Hanna said.

Hanna criticized Republicans who signed Norquist’s anti-tax pledge: “I don’t give out my vote to someguy named Grover… my vote belongs to you, belongs to the country, I represent you… And what you seenow is a lot of 230-something other Republicans signed onto that… I didn’t do it and I won’t do it. Ihaven’t signed any of those things. It’s not my right to sign them.” [Finger Lakes Daily News, 6/28/11]

Hanna: Not Raising Debt Ceiling is “Unrealistic”

In June 2011, Hanna commented, “The stimulus package wasted billions of dollars on political and social

items and didn’t spend enough on the nation’s infrastructure…but to refrain from raising the country’sdebt ceiling is unrealistic.” [The Daily Star, 6/10/2011]

Hanna: Homeland Security Funding Cuts “Strike the Right Balance”

In June 2011, Hanna commented that the $1.1 bullion cut in Homeland Security funding “strikes the right balance between fiscal responsibility and providing for a robust homeland defense.” Senator Schumer called the cuts “draconian.” [Poughkeepsie Journal, 6/06/2011]

Voted Against Clean Debt Ceiling Raise

In May 2011, Hanna voted against HR 1954, a clean federal debt ceiling raise of $2.4 trillion.

The bill was rejected by the full House, 97-318. [HR 1954, 5/31/11]

Hanna Said GOP “Gamesmanship” Over Debt Limit Was Not Helpful, Hoped “Majority Of People

In Congress Will Recognize That And Vote For It”

5

Page 6: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 6/23

On May 17, 2011, Hanna said of GOP opposition to raising the debt ceiling, “This kind of gamesmanshipis never helpful. Everybody who understands what the nature of the debt limit is, understands that it has togo up and that, hopefully, the majority of people in Congress will recognize that and vote for it. I dounderstand that some people ran for office saying they would not. Well, that was a little misguided.”According to YNN, “Hanna says while it's important to begin the process of getting federal spending

under control, this is no time for his colleagues to paint themselves into a corner while jeopardizingeconomic recovery.” [YNN, 5/17/11]

Hanna Voted For $9 Trillion Debt Limit Increase In Ryan Budget. 

According to The Washington Post: Plum Line blog in April 2011, the Ryan budget, “says that infiscal year 2012, the appropriate debt limit would be $16.2 trillion — nearly two trillion higher than it is now. In 2021, according to Ryan’s proposal, the proper debt limit would be $23.1 trillion — nearly $9 trillion higher than the present.” Hanna voted for the Ryan budget. [The Washington

Post: Plum Line blog, 4/21/11; H.Con.Res 34, vote no. 277, 4/15/11]

“Not On Board” With Republican Budget Approach

On April 7, 2011 Hanna said that he was “not on board” with the Republican strategy of trying to pass a budget that included numerous social issues as riders.

“It's gone from a budget battle to an ideological battle over certain issues that are included in the budgetcuts that simply are unpalatable to the other side and I understand that and, to be frank, I'm not on boardfor that. I came here to cut the budget and move forward and get on to bigger issues,” Hanna said. [YNN

 News, 4/07/11]

Uncertain about Ryan Budget Plan

In 2011, Hanna remained non-committal on Paul Ryan’s budget proposal. Vowing to spend time lookingover the legislation, Hanna expressed concerns about the preservation of key social programs such asMedicare and Social Security.

“Any budget I support must put our country on a path to fiscal responsibility; it must reform andstrengthen Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. It must allow the United States to continue to be asociety of opportunity,” said Hanna. [auburnpub.com, 4/06/11]

Opposed Republicans’ Government Shutdown Prevention Act

In 2011, Hanna opposed Republican sponsored legislation to continuing funding government or another 

week while making $12 billion in cuts and funding the military through the end of the year.

“I voted No on H.R. 1255. It is clear that this legislation does not contain a spending plan for the rest of the year that can be enacted into law […] I simply cannot support gamesmanship that is about politics, not policy. I came to Washington to be serious about solutions that get our nation back on track. All sidesneed to agree on a fiscally responsible spending plan so that we may tackle issues such as the 2012 budgetand pro-growth economic policy.” [auburnpub.com, 4/06/11]

6

Page 7: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 7/23

Government Shutdown Would Be “Failure on the Part of Congress”

In April 2011, Hanna said that a government shutdown would evidence a failure on the part of Congress.

“People are preparing for it. All the staff here is preparing for it. Of course, we are not interestedin a shutdown, have not been. I think it's a sign of failure on the part of the Congress that they can'tget a budget passed. I think that we have to remember that this is a budget that should have been passed by the last Congress and was not and now we're trying to work through it again.”[WKTV.com, 4/08/11]

Called Policy Riders in Budget Bill “Distracting”

In April 2011, Hanna said that the budget deal that was struck between Republicans andDemocrats was free of policy riders.

“Importantly, this bill is free of distracting and divisive social policy riders, which I have opposedfrom the start,” he said. [The Journal News, 4/08/11]

Voted Against Defunding NPR 

In 2011, Hanna voted against defunding National Public Radio.

“I am troubled that this bill would have government picking winners and losers in the media. This bill wasunnecessarily rushed through the House and amounts to political censorship through the power of the purse." [publicbroadcasting.net, 03/18/11]

Hanna Reluctantly Voted for “Draconian” GOP Budget

In February 2011, Hanna voted for the GOP budget, but was unhappy with the bill.

Hanna said, “I wasn’t happy with the Republican proposal…I thought there were things in there that weremore political and social than cost-saving. And I was looking forward to making hard decisions on thedeficit.” Hanna said he voted against many of the amendments that cut funding for social programs, but inthe end he voted for the overall bill because he knew that many of the most severe cuts will never beapproved. “You really have to hope that at the end of the day this was part of the process, and that most of the draconian cuts will be restored as part of a compromise…I like National Public Radio. I don’t want tocut public television. I didn’t want to cut health care provided through Planned Parenthood…At the end of the day, I know a lot of the things in there will never be law. And people have to view it as part of a long

 process, and not get too excited about it. Let’s hope the Senate comes back with a more balancedapproached. I think they will.” [Post-Standard, 2/20/11]

Business and Consumer Issues

Spoke to Small Businesses

7

Page 8: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 8/23

In 2011, Hanna spoke at a small business roundtable hosted by the Chamber of Commerce.

Hanna said, “It [financial troubles] starts and ends with small business owners. We must allow small business owners to expand and create jobs…This means they must be willing to take risks and they

should be rewarded for those risks.” [Rome Observer, 08/12/2011]

Campaign Finance Issues

Spent $5,500 on Keynote Speaker, Airfare

From July to September 2011, Hanna spent $5,500 on a keynote speaker and airfare. [Richard Hanna for 

Congress, 2011 October Quarterly FEC Report, Filed 10/14/11]

Reimbursed Himself $3,900 for Catering

From July to September 2011, Hanna reimbursed himself $3,907 for catering.   [Richard Hanna for Congress,

2011 October Quarterly FEC Report, Filed 10/14/11]

Owed $25,000 to Consultant for “Win Bonus”

As of October 2011, Hanna’s campaign owed Jamestown Associates $25,000 for a “Win Bonus.” [Richard

Hanna for Congress, 2011 October Quarterly FEC Report, Filed 10/14/11]

Crime & Public Safety Issues

Hanna Co-Sponsored Bill That Would Overturn Ban On Selling Certain Toys With Lead Content

In May 2011, Hanna co-sponsored the Kids Just Want to Ride Act (H.R. 412) which would overturn “afederal law that will effectively ban the sale of kid-sized bikes and ATVs at the end of 2011 due to thelead content of some parts.” “Motorcycling is a healthy activity that should be encouraged, not curtailed by over-reaching government laws, said bill co-sponsor Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.). ‘That's what I'drather have my kids do, to get outdoors and get some exercise...and ride their bikes,’ he said.” [ American

Motorcycle Association, 4/29/11; American Motorcycle Association, 5/26/11]

Economic and Financial IssuesMet with Constituents; Discussed Economic Issues

In January 2012, Hanna held meetings with constituents in his district. Hanna said that the greatestconcern he heard from his constituents was with regards to the economy.

8

Page 9: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 9/23

"We need to re-grow our economy and people talk about jobs. You know what? It's not just about jobs.It's about the quality of jobs. We can't just replace jobs with service jobs. We need science, technology,engineering, math. High paying, good middle class jobs that provide people with the standard of livingthis country has become accustomed to," Hanna said. [wbng.com, 1/05/12]

Opposed Gillibrand’s Upstate Works Act

In December 2011, Hanna said he was opposed to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s five-part plan, the UpstateWorks Act, which would provide federal tax credits, loans and grants.

“The core of the problem is that we’ve lost our middle class. People don’t mind so much where they arein life as long as they have a belief that the system is fair and open and that through hard work and energyand entrepreneurship they can transform their livers. We have kind of lost that,” Hanna said.[poughkeepsiejournal.com, 1/03/12]

Returned Personal Office Money to Treasury

In September 2011, Hanna spent 63.6 percent of his $1,422,470. Hanna said he planned to give each staff member a $500 year-end bonus and return any leftover money to the Treasury. [lohud.com, 12/22/11]

Spoke About Need for Infrastructure Repair

In November 2011, Hanna said that he considered a six year highway bill to fund transportationinfrastructure projects a jobs bill.

Hanna said, “At this point, it’s a lot of both because you create so many jobs -- 25,000 to 30,000 for every billion you spend. It’s something we need to do. Our infrastructure in the state of New York -- we have6,000-plus bridges in need of repair and some of them are closed. Throughout the country it’s like that.It’s a good place to start. It’s low hanging fruit for jobs. These are good paying jobs and an investment inthe future. We should look at this as an easy way to get something done and the longer the (highway) bill,the better off we are because it takes years to plan these projects.” [The Citizen, 11/24/11]

Hanna Praised Federal Weatherization Program

In October 2011, Hanna stressed the importance of weatherization efforts, and specifically praised thefederal Weatherization Assistance Program. “We have to fight to keep these programs alive,” he said.“It’s hard enough surviving in upstate New York with the loss of jobs and income ... it’s critical these programs are available.” [Little Falls Times, 10/31/11]

 

2009: Recovery Act Provided $5 Billion in Weatherization Funding. According to theDepartment of Energy, the Weatherization Assistance Program received $5 billion to weatherizenearly 600,000 homes under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Also, “In addition tothe funding increase, a number of amendments were enacted to allow more cost-effectivemeasures to be installed in more homes, including raising the maximum dollar limit per dwellingfrom $2,500 to $6,500.” [U.S. Department of Energy website, accessed 11/01/11]

 

9

Page 10: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 10/23

2010: Hanna Criticized Recovery Act. During his 2010 campaign for Congress, Hanna washighly critical of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), and referred to it as “thefailed stimulus.” Hanna said the bill “was designed to be a government self-stimulus bill and promoted a social agenda that most Americans did not have a say in - especially our children,” andthat he would not have voted for it. [Utica Observer-Dispatch, 9/21/11; Utica Observer-Dispatch, 2/18/11]

 

2011: Hanna Joined RSC, RSC Called for Eliminating Weatherization Program. Followinghis election, Hanna joined the conservative Republican Study Committee in January 2011. Shortlythereafter, the RSC unveiled an FY 2011 budget proposal that would have eliminated Departmentof Energy grants to states for weatherization. [Watertown Daily Times, 1/23/11; U.S. News, 1/20/11]

Hanna Op-Ed: “3 Percent Withholding Hurts Small Businesses”

In October 2011, Hanna wrote an op-ed for Roll Call speaking out against a provision that would requirelocal, state, or federal governments to withhold 3 percent from all payments to any business thatcontracted goods and services.

Hanna wrote that the tax would cost more than it saved and it was a good example of “the law of unintended consequences”. He also wrote, “Above all else, this requirement will greatly lessen one greatAmerican value associated with contracts and bidding: competition. Contractors who deliver publicservices for local, state and federal governments could decide they simply can’t afford to be governmentvendors. We should foster competition, not limit it.” [Roll Call, 10/26/11]

Education Issues

Supported All Children are Equal Act

In December 2011, Hanna supported the All Children are Equal Act, which would ensure that schoolswith a high percentage of low-income students would receive more federal funding, as opposed to thecurrent system which allocates funds based on the number of children in the school.

Hanna said, “It will be a fairer system, because it's designed to help children. It is designed to helpchildren in poverty or children in need, but it isn't happening that way now, because it measured by population.” [wktv.com, 12/12/11]

Co-sponsored ACE Act, Altering Public School Funding

In July 2011, Barletta cosponsored the All Children Are Equal (ACE) Act. The legislation “fixes a grossinequity in the way formulas are calculated under Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act,which provides funds to local school districts in order to improve the education of disadvantaged students.The current formula has the perverse effect of diverting funding from higher poverty school districts tomore populous school districts, regardless of the actual poverty rates.” [gantdaily.com, 7/14/11]

Energy Issues

10

Page 11: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 11/23

Voted Against BULB Act

In July 2011, Hanna was one of 10 Republicans to vote against the BULB Act, legislation repealinggovernment lighting standards.

Hanna said that he opposed rolling back lighting standards because it would have taken away the rights of states and localities to determine their own standards and because the industry has already started makingthe more efficient fluorescent bulbs.

Hanna said, “These bulbs are up to one-third more efficient than older bulbs…Such efficient lighting cansave consumers money over the long term and benefit the environment.” [The Post-Standard, 7/13/11]

Joined Marcellus Shale Caucus

In 2011, Hanna joined the Marcellus Shale Caucus. The caucus is focused on examining the effects of 

hydrofracking for natural gas in the region. [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 03/15/11]

Environmental Issues

Joined Marcellus Shale Caucus

In 2011, Hanna joined the Marcellus Shale Caucus. The caucus is focused on examining the effects of hydrofracking for natural gas in the region. [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 03/15/11]

Ethics Issues

Hanna Called for Weiner’s Resignation

In June 2011, Hanna called for Rep. Anthony Weiner to resign. Hanna commented that “Congress has lostother lawmakers in connection with sexual indiscretions or poor behavior…Weiner’s behavior raisesquestions about his judgment.” [The Daily Star, 6/11/2011]

Reader Accused Hanna Of Plagiarism

 

A reader noted that a recent op-ed by Rep. Richard Hanna in the Syracuse Post-Standard explaining hisvote against extending provisions of the Patriot Act had significant passages that appear to be lifteddirectly from a Cato Institute piece by Julian Sanchez. [Politicalwire.com, 2/22/11]

Hanna Said Investments Might Be Conflict of Interest

In February 2011, Hanna said he was considering selling any investments he had that could be considereda conflict of interest. Hanna serves on the House committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Hanna

11

Page 12: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 12/23

said, “Let's say I owned $20 million in railroads, absolutely that would be a conflict…And just as a principle, I may sell something that glaring. I think I probably will.” [Democrat and Chronicle, 2/14/11]

Foreign Policy Issues – Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea

Gay and Lesbian Issues

Received Award For Support of DADT Repeal

In September 2011, Hanna was one of four Republicans to receive an award at the Spirit of LincolnAwards Dinner, hosted by the Log Cabin Republicans, for his support of the DADT repeal. [Milford Daily

 News, 09/20/2011]

Voted Against Amendment Affirming Defense of Marriage Act

In July 2011, Hanna was one of six House Republicans to vote against an amendment reaffirming theDefense of Marriage Act as part of major Pentagon spending legislation. [washingtonblade.com, 7/07/11]

Gun Issues

Homeland Security Issues

Hosted Meeting of New York Defense Working Group

In December 2011, Hanna along with Rep Bishop hosted the first meeting of the New York DefenseWorking Group, meant to promote and protect New York’s military facilities.

Hanna was happy with the group’s first meeting and said, “We need to work together as a delegation toensure that New York's military assets are not unduly and negatively impacted. I'm working to ensure theoperations in Rome and elsewhere in New York are not only preserved but bolstered and strengthened.Today's meeting was just the beginning of a long-term, proactive effort.” [auburnpub.com, 12/02/11]

Hanna Voted Against Patriot Act Provisions

In February 2011, Hanna voted against extending certain provisions of the Patriot Act. Hanna said,“While it is our rightful duty to provide security for our free nation, we must be mindful of theConstitution. In its current form, the Patriot Act does not reflect the spirit of the Fourth Amendment. Iurge Congress to hold hearings immediately and enact meaningful reforms to this well-intentioned butflawed law.” [AuburnPub.com, 2/15/11]

12

Page 13: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 13/23

Health Care Issues

Hanna Co-sponsored Legislation Altering Health Coverage Exclusion Law

In June 2011, Hanna co-sponsored HR 2088 “to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ‘extend the

exclusion from gross income for employer-provided health coverage for employees’ spouses anddependent children to coverage provided to other eligible designated beneficiaries of employees.” [Targeted

 News Service, 6/06/2011]

Human Rights Campaign Lauded Reform Effort

In June 2011, the Human Rights Campaign commended Senate and House efforts at alteringhealth coverage exclusion laws, commenting that “The bill would end the unfair taxation of employer-provided health insurance for domestic partners.” [Human Rights Campaign, 6/09/2011]

Citizen: Hanna Votes to Repeal Health Care After Saying He Would Not

In January 2011, The Citizen’s editorial board called Hanna’s vote to repeal the health care reform law“disappointing” and “discouraging.” Hanna voted to repeal the legislation after saying during hiscampaign that he would not vote to repeal it unless he was convinced that there was a true effort to fix theexisting plan. He had admitted the bill was flawed but believed there were features that could be builtupon. The Citizen felt like he went back on that promise. [auburnpub.com, Editorial, 1/23/11]

Immigration and Border Issues

Israel

Labor and Working Family Issues

Believed in ‘Quality,’ rather than ‘Quantity’ of Jobs

In January 2012, Hanna said that the economy should be focused on the quality, not the quantity of jobs.He said he believed employment must provide individuals with good standard of living. [wktv.com, 1/06/12]

Asked Governor to Reconsider Closing Correctional Facility Because of Impact of Job Loss

In July 2011, Hanna wrote a letter to Governor Andrew Cuomo asking him to reconsider his decision toclose Oneida Correctional Facility, based in Oneida County.

13

Page 14: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 14/23

Hanna said the facility was a major employer and that the loss of the prison on top of the loss of other jobsin the community would have “severe and wide-ranging economic impacts on the City of Rome andsurrounding areas.”

Hanna said, “While I certainly support your efforts to cut the cost of state government, I am deeply

concerned that upstate is bearing a disproportionate burden considering its economic struggles.”[auburnpub.com, 7/21/11]

Other Social Issues

Addressed Group Protesting Possible Entitlement Cuts

In July 2011, protesters gathered outside of Hanna’s district office to express concerns on cuts to programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

Hanna said, “I completely agree that Social Security and Medicare should be strengthened and preservedfor current and future beneficiaries.” [wktv.com, 7/20/11]

AARP Members Protested Outside District Office

In July 2011, AARP members gathered outside Hanna’s office in Utica to protest proposed cuts toMedicare and Social Security. [wktv.com, 7/14/11]

Stem Cells

Tax Issues

Agreed to Extension of Payroll Tax Cuts

In December 2011, Hanna agreed that the payroll tax cuts should be extended.

Hanna said he supported the House bill, but also backed the House’s effort to form a conferencecommittee to negotiate an agreement with the Senate.

“I would have voted for the Senate bill. I wasn’t going to walk away and deny people those payroll tax cutextensions, unemployment insurance and temporary ‘doc fix. We’ve got an opportunity here to dosomething bigger and I’m happy to support that,” Hanna said. [auburnpub.com, 12/22/11]

Signed Letter Saying He Was Open to Tax Increases

14

Page 15: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 15/23

In November 2011, Hanna was one of 40 Republicans to join 60 Democrats in a letter to theCongressional “Super Committee” that said “all options” should be included in a deficit reduction package, including increasing revenues.

The letter stated, “To succeed, all options for mandatory and discretionary spending and revenues must beon the table. In addition, we know from other bipartisan frameworks that a target of some $4 trillion indeficit reduction is necessary to stabilize our debt as a share of the economy and assure America’s fiscalwell-being.” [thinkprogress.org, 11/02/11]

Hanna: “Room at the Very Top For Marginal Tax Changes”

In September 2011, Richard Hanna said he was open to increasing taxes on the wealthiest Americans.

“I do think there is room at the very top for marginal tax changes,” he said. “I don’t think you want tohurt businesses that are making $250,000 or $500,000. Those are the real people who create theopportunity to put people to work. I think people who make $1 million a year (could pay more). … Give(a tax break) to someone who is going to spend it or give a break to someone who needs it.” [uticaod.com,

09/17/2011]

Praised by Taxpayers for Common Sense for Opposition to Ethanol Subsidies

In June 2011, Taxpayers for Common Sense met with and praised Hanna for his support for eliminatingall ethanol subsidies. The group called on Hanna to eliminate other farm-related subsidies. [The Post-

Standard, 6/28/2011]

Hanna Co-sponsored Legislation Repealing Tax on Tanning Services

In June 2011, Hanna co-sponsored H.R. 2092 “to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ‘repeal the

excise tax on indoor tanning services.” [Targeted News Service, 6/06/2011]

Tea Party

Transportation Issues

Spoke About Need for Infrastructure Repair

In November 2011, Hanna said that he considered a six year highway bill to fund transportationinfrastructure projects a jobs bill.

Hanna said, “At this point, it’s a lot of both because you create so many jobs -- 25,000 to 30,000 for every billion you spend. It’s something we need to do. Our infrastructure in the state of New York -- we have6,000-plus bridges in need of repair and some of them are closed. Throughout the country it’s like that.It’s a good place to start. It’s low hanging fruit for jobs. These are good paying jobs and an investment in

15

Page 16: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 16/23

the future. We should look at this as an easy way to get something done and the longer the (highway) bill,the better off we are because it takes years to plan these projects.” [The Citizen, 11/24/11]

Expressed Support For $12 Million Federal Grant for Airport

In October 2011, the Greater Binghamton Airport secured a $12.3 million federal grant to fundimprovements for runway safety.

Hanna said, “I'm pleased that the Greater Binghamton Airport was awarded this grant to make importantsafety improvements on runway 34. As a pilot and member of the House Committee on Transportationand Infrastructure, I know first-hand that safety is the number one priority in aviation. I'm pleased theairport and the FAA are committed to worthy projects like this to make our airspace safer. This runway project will not only put people back to work in Broome County, but will also allow the airport tocontinue its successful growth that will bring real economic benefits to the entire Southern Tier.” [News

Channel 34, 10/11/2011]

Hanna: “High Speed Rail in Upstate New York Never Made Sense”

In September 2011, Hanna spoke with the Observer-Dispatch editorial board about high speed rail.

“Big idea going nowhere. High speed rail in Upstate New York never made sense,” he said. “There wasnever a chance of it and it would be the gift that eats. It puts the cart in front of the horse. New York state’s economy is bad, and that’s why people are leaving. We don’t need more things that imagine it will be our savior. If you had $11 billion, is that where you would put it? Would you build something that is soexpensive you can’t afford to maintain it? Ridership would be low, and not enough people would use it. Idon’t think that’s where you should spend it. In a perfect world if you had a lot of money and you wanted

to do it, I guess it would be done.” [uticaod.com, 09/17/2011]

Praised Transportation Reauthorization Proposal

In July 2011, Hanna joined with the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure to unveil thesix-year transportation reauthorization proposal.

Hanna said, “This bill provides a level of funding that is consistent with the amount of revenue that wecollect. It is a fiscally responsible bill and it is a bill that we can pass through the House of Representatives this year...This bill maximizes the revenue we currently have and provides states andtransit agencies with long-term predictability.” [auburnpup.com, 7/11/11]

Hanna: “We’ll Try to Get What We Can” in Federal Funding for Transportation

In June 2011, Hanna stated, “Transportation used to be an earmark Mecca. I think there were 6,000 or 7,000 earmarks (given out in previous years) now there are zero – we’ll try to get what we can for our district and we’ve laid down a path toward that knowing full well it’s something we need and a plan thatcan help.” [Utica Observer-Dispatch, 6/30/2011]

16

Page 17: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 17/23

Women’s Issues

MiscellaneousJoined the ‘Yellow Pages’ Caucus

In January 2012, Hanna signed a Dear Member letter urging his colleagues to join the Yellow Pagescaucus.

According to the letter, the Yellow Pages caucus is, “a group of Members of Congress dedicated toreliance on the private sector, to the maximum extent possible, rather than government, to providecommercially available goods and services to the government and the American people.”

“It is the goal of the Yellow Pages Caucus to apply a test to every existing or newly proposed Federalactivity – if the activity is available from a private company found in the Yellow Pages of the telephone book, that activity should either not be a responsibility of the Federal government, or it should actually be performed by a private firm under contract with the Federal government.” [Yellow Pages Caucus Letter,

1/18/12]

‘Disillusioned’ with Republican Party

In January 2012, Hanna said that he was growing “disillusioned” with the national Republican Party.

Hanna was asked if he thought he would endorse a presidential candidate by the time of the New York State Republican primary, or the National Republican Convention in late August.

“I won't be going to the convention. I have plenty of work right here where I am,” Hanna said. [The Daily

Star, 1/17/12 ]

Employed Lobbyist

In January 2012, Hanna hired a lobbyist to assist him with redistricting-related negotiations.

“We did hire a lobbyist. It's one of those things if you're not at the table you are kind of on the menu,”Hanna said. “We're just watching the process. We don't have a lot of input. We figured out we need towatch the process and be able to give our opinion and that's all we're doing.” [auburnpub.com, 1/10/12]

Hanna: Yelling Doesn’t Add Value

In January 2012, Hanna criticized Congress for its unwillingness to compromise and said that “yelling”about ideological positions yielded few results.

“Although I knew how the system worked, the majority really does rule, and it can be pretty heavy-handed,” Hanna said. “And the bigger the majority, the less desire there is to compromise. So people like

17

Page 18: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 18/23

me, I think, in time will be more valuable, not less. I think that deliberate action and reasoned thought,and kind of a comprehensive work ethic, is what people here need. I mean, you can yell all you want. Butthat doesn’t mean you are adding value.”[syracuse.com, 1/09/12]

Endorsed Jon Huntsman

In January 2012, Hanna endorsed Jon Huntsman for president.

“Our nation needs a leader to fix our debt crisis, create jobs, and adapt to the international pressures weface,” Hanna said. “Jon Huntsman has the experience, record and vision to tackle these challenges andrestore trust in Washington. He is an accomplished governor with hands-on foreign policy experience, andis offering conservative solutions to jumpstart our economy and increase our global competitiveness. Isupport Jon Huntsman because he stands for pro-growth economic solutions, individual liberty, and astrong, smart America on the world stag.” [ynn.com, 1/09/12]

Wanted to Support Iraq/Afghanistan War Veterans

In January 2012, Hanna said that he was looking to push for services and benefits for the more than70,000 veterans returning to his district.

"We've had two un-funded wars. Afghanistan and Iraq. Two wars we shouldn't have had frankly. We'velooking at a trillion dollars going out in the future to help these men and women with what they need.With injuries we've never seen in the history of the world. We need to support these people," Hanna said.[wbng.com, 1/05/12]

Disappointed in GOP Candidates

In January 2012, Hanna said he was disappointed with Republican candidates for president. He noted thathe was looking for a candidate with more experience in international politics.

"It's crazy to watch isn't it?” Hanna said. “Watching those debates are like watching The Gong Show. Ihaven't come up with anybody yet and I am not sure that I will. Kind of disappointed. I looked at thequality of ideas coming out of these men and women and I am not particularly impressed. So I am stillwaiting.” [wbng.com, 1/05/12]

Supported STOCK Act

In December 2011, Hanna supported the STOCK Act that would put a ban on congressional insider trading, but had not yet co-sponsored the legislation.

Hanna said he understood why people were upset by the exemption. He said he wasn’t sure if the solutionwould be as easy as passing legislation, but recognized that a restriction needed to be put into place.Hanna said, “Congress is exempt and it shouldn’t be as wide open as it is. There ought to be a rule thatsays you can’t act on what you know.” [auburnpub.com, 12/4/11]

Worked to Secure $500 Million in Federal Disaster Aid for BAE Systems

18

Page 19: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 19/23

In November 2011, Hanna was working to secure $500 million in federal disaster money to find a newlocation for BAE Systems, which was badly damaged during floods in September.

Money for the project would go to the Broome County Industrial Development Agency. Hanna alongwith Rep. Hinchey wrote to House and Senate Appropriations Committee leaders to find a deal on

funding for the Economic Development Agency for FY2012. [pressconnects.com, 11/16/11]

Had Estimated Net Worth of $27,837,562

In November 2011, it was reported that Hanna had an estimated net worth of $27,837,562.

Hanna’s money comes from his career in construction and his business, Hanna Construction. He is the25th wealthiest member of Congress. [auburnpub.com, 11/15/11]

House Passed His Civilian Service Recognition Act of 2011

In November 2011, the House passed Hanna’s Civilian Service Recognition Act of 2011, which wouldgive flags to families of federal civilian workers killed on the job, by a vote of 425-0.

Hanna met with the American Legion to assure that honor for civilians would be different from honor for military service members killed in combat. Hanna said, “This is a modest but significant benefit to honor federal civilian employees who work within our country and in countless overseas posts.” [syracuse.com,

11/02/11]

Spent $36,902.98 on Franked Mail

From July-September 2011, Hanna spent $36,902.98 on franked mail distributed via the U.S. PostalService. [2011 3nd Quarter Statements of Disbursement, 10/5/11]

Reimbursed Himself $374.70 in Travel Expenses

From July-September 2011, Hanna was reimbursed for $374.70 in commercial transportation. [2011 3nd

Quarter Statements of Disbursement, 10/5/11]

Spent $47,013.58 on Printing

From July-September 2011, Hanna spent $47,013.58 on printing. [2011 3nd Quarter Statements of Disbursement,

10/5/11]

Hanna: “A Lot of Bloviation” in GOP Caucus Meetings

In 2011, Richard Hanna told the Observer-Dispatch editorial board that House Republican caucusmeetings feature “a lot of bloviation.”

 “As soon as I hear the same thing twice, I leave,” he said. “Someone told me that everything has beensaid, but not everyone has said it. So, I figured as soon as I hear the same thing twice I’m gone, and I

19

Page 20: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 20/23

haven’t missed anything. … I learned a new word, bloviate. There’s a lot of bloviation.” [uticaod.com,09/17/2011]

Received 39% Score From Heritage Action for America

Hanna received 39 percent score from Heritage Action for America in 2011. [Heritage Action for America,

accessed 8/29/11]

Daily Star Criticized Hanna for Being “Swept Along” with the GOP Tide

In July 2011, the Daily Star criticized Hanna for professing not to be an ideologue, but allowing himself to be “swept along with the tide, being a reliable vote for Boehner, and not putting up much of a fuss.”The Star asked Hanna to start taking his responsibility more seriously. [The Daily Star, Editorial, 7/29/11]

Hailed Passage of Legislation Eliminating Programs under Small Business Administration

In July 2011, Hanna hailed the passage of legislation extending Small Business Administration programs

and eliminating some programs that were duplicative or under-used, like one program aimed atdeveloping companies in Central Europe that had not been funded since 1995 and another that backed bonds used for the purchase of pollution control equipment though bonds had not been issued for 30years.

Hanna said, “It has been said that once a program is initiated, it is almost impossible to eliminate…Todaywe will prove the notion wrong.” [The Hill, 7/26/11]

Sponsored Amendment to Prevent Spending on Luxury Car Leases

In July 2011, Hanna wrote a Dear Colleague letter announcing an amendment to the Legislative

Appropriations Act to prevent leasing of luxury cars by Congress members. The amendment installs a$1,000 monthly cap on car leases.

Hanna said, “The U.S. Senate does not offer any car leasing perk. If Senators can get by without car leases, then Members of the People’s House should be able to get by with less expensive vehicles.” [Office

of Congressman Hanna, 7/21/11]

Voted for Legislation Granting Flood Insurance Reprieve

In July 2011, Hanna voted for the Flood Insurance Reform Act, giving homeowners in newly classifiedflood hazard zones a three-year break from the federal mandate to buy flood insurance. The legislation

would give the owners of about 2,400 Onondaga County properties a reprieve.

Hanna said, “One of the most important provisions in this legislation is to protect homeowners andcommunities from being erroneously drawn into flood zones and subsequently required to purchaseexpensive insurance policies…It also streamlines the appeals process for homeowners who believethey’ve been incorrectly included in a flood map.” [The Post-Standard, 7/13/11]

Considered Possible Tubman National Park 

20

Page 21: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 21/23

In July 2011, Hanna met with National Park Service officials, Congressman Andy Harris, and Senator Ben Cardin regarding a possible Tubman national park. Hanna's office confirmed that the meeting took  place and that Hanna was looking into the measure. [auburnpup.com, 7/11/11]

Local Paper Wanted Hanna to Make Tubman National Park a Priority

In June 2011, AuburnPub editorialized that Hanna hadn’t “come out against establishing a national park in Auburn recognizing Harriet Tubman, but he sure hasn’t been pushing for it the way we’d like him to…we want to see him make Harriet Tubman National Park one of his priorities and get it on his party’sagenda.”

The paper commented, “Perhaps it can’t happen this year. But after more than 10 years of governmentoffices putting in countless hours research the possibility- and coming to the conclusion that it’s a goodidea- it would be a woeful waste of government spending to let this project fall by the wayside now.”[AuburnPub.com, 6/23/2011]

Hanna: “Everything is Going Wrong”

In June 2011, Hanna commented during a Chamber of Commerce luncheon that he thought it was “a greattime to be in Congress because everything is going wrong.” [AuburnPub.com, 6/22/2011]

Hanna Paid Chief of Staff Least Among NY Freshman

In June 2011, it was reported that Hanna paid his chief of staff the least among New York freshman. “Theaverage salary for a chief of staff was $136,588 in 2009…Hanna paid his $26,644.44 in the first quarter,the equivalent of $106,578 annually.” [Star-Gazette, 6/16/2011]

Hanna: Nanocenter in Mohawk Valley Would Bring “Unprecedented Economic Growth”

In June 2011, Hanna, with Senators Schumer and Gillibrand, called on the Army Corps of Engineers “toswiftly consider and approve Mohawk Valley EDGE’s appeal to have Special Condition No. 1 removedfrom their site development permit.” Schumer, Gillibrand and Hanna believe that a quick issuance of the permit will allow EDGE to move forward with “site preparations and construction, so that the facility canin turn attract a world-class, job-creating high-technology tenant.”

Hanna commented, “If EDGE succeeds in attracting a Nanocenter to Mohawk Valley it would meanunprecedented economic growth for Central New York and I urge the Corps to grant the appeal.” [Office of 

Congressman Hanna, 6/16/2011]

Hanna Signed Letter Asking for Protection of GPS

In June 2011, Hanna signed the General Aviation Caucus letter to the FCC expressing concern thatLightSquared’s proposed communication network might adversely impact GPS. The letter stated, “If GPSis interfered with, aviation and numerous other private and public sector activities will be adverselyimpacted, including public safety, homeland security, transportation, agriculture and construction…”[Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, 6/15/2011]

21

Page 22: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 22/23

Hanna Announced Jobs Plan for Upstate New York 

In June 2011, Hanna announced his “HARVEST” job plan for growth in upstate New York. The plan“looks at areas ranging from high-tech manufacturing to agriculture for the future and veterans in the

workforce to educating our children to work and succeed locally.

Hanna commented, “The goal for me has always been helping to foster private sector job creation inUpstate New York…I will continue to work in Washington to help create an atmosphere to preserve andcreate good jobs Upstate so that our children may work and live here for generations to come.” [Office of 

Congressman Hanna, 6/06/2011]

Hanna Supported Amendment Benefiting Local Manufacturer

In June 2011, Hanna voiced his support for an amendment “to require the Department of Defense toassess the US titanium manufacturing industrial base and report to the Congressional defensecommittees.” The amendment is to counter Senate legislation allowing for the Defense Department to purchase metals from foreign allies cheaper than US manufactures can provide. The amendment would benefit TECT power, a manufacturer of components for the aerospace and industrial gas industries inHanna’s district.

Hanna commented on the amendment stating, “This will lead to undoing the ill consequences of theSenate’s ‘Berry Amendment’ on our manufacturers like TECT.” [Office of Congressman Hanna, 6/06/2011]

Hanna Sponsored Legislation Incentivizing Comprehensive State Building Codes

In June 2011, Hanna sponsored the Safe Building Codes Incentives Act, which “creates a financialincentive for states to adopt and enforce statewide building codes that would protect communities in theevent of hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, fire, and other natural disasters. States that enactcomprehensive building codes will qualify for an additional four percent of funding for disaster relief.”[Congressional Documents and Publications, 6/03/2011]

Hanna Requested Disaster Relief Funds For New York State

In May 2011, Hanna, along with Democratic members of the New York State delegation wrote a letter toPresident Obama in support of Governor Cuomo’s request for a major disaster declaration and federal aidfollowing severe flooding in upstate New York. The letter stated that, “Without assistance from thefederal government, many local leaders question how they will be able to make necessary repairs, the costof which far exceeds local resources.” [Office of Congressman Hinchey, 5/26/2011]

Hanna Pledged To Provide An Explanation For Every Vote He Takes On A Bill, But Not

Amendments

According to The Post Standard, Hanna, “says voters deserve to know more about why their representatives vote for or against legislation in Congress. So he has decided to offer a written explanationof every one of his votes… [and] post his explanations on his official congressional Facebook page.Hanna plans to offer insight into his thinking on every bill and resolution he votes on, with the exception

22

Page 23: Richard Hanna Clipbook

8/4/2019 Richard Hanna Clipbook

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/richard-hanna-clipbook 23/23

of procedural votes or amendments. That means he'll also explain ceremonial votes, such as the naming of federal post offices.” [The Post Standard, 5/08/2011]

Hanna advocated for development of Nanotech site in Mohawk Valley

In May 2011, Congressional Documents and Publications reported that Hanna, along with Senator Gillibrand, had helped to organize a meeting between the Army corps of Engineers and Mohawk ValleyEconomic Development Growth Enterprises to “discuss the development of the Nanotech site andaddressing the permitting process that is required for bringing a semiconductor manufacturer to theregion.” Hanna commented that, “Successful construction of the Nanotech site in Marcy would be atremendous boon for our community.” [Congressional Documents and Publications, 5/05/2011]

2012 Campaign