Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    1/16

    Writing Today

    Ch. 21 & 22

    RHETORICAL PATTERNS

    & ARGUMENTATIVESTRATEGIES

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    2/16

    Definition: Like description, but very preciseuse definitions

    to explain an unknown term to your readers.

    Ways to use definition:

    Word Originwhere did the word come form? How has it come to

    mean what it means?

    Examplesuseful for explaining idioms. The book cites the phrase

    drank the Kool-Aid

    Negationexplain something by saying what it is not.

    Divisionexplaining various meanings of a word (only when the

    multiple meanings are all relevant.

    Comparisonbring in similar examples to show how the word youredefining compares and contrasts.

    Analogyanalogies can help explain complex terms: the books

    example is the analogy of the human circulatory as a city

    RHETORICAL PATTERNS: DEFINITION

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    3/16

    Classification allows you to divide objects and people into

    groups, so they can be di scussed in greater depth (431). You

    can use class ification for a single paragraph or to structure a

    larger section of your paper.

    To write a classification, WT breaks the process down: 1. List everything that fits into the whole class.

    2. Decide on a principle of classification. (how to sort the classes)

    3. Sort into major and minor groups. (Sort your list using the

    principle. Ideally there everything you came up with in your list will fit

    neatly into only one category.

    RHETORICAL PATTERNS: CLASSIFICATION

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    4/16

    When explaining causes and effects, identify both causes

    and effects and then explain how and why specific causes led

    to those effects (433).

    Sometimes you will present causes and ef fects in a

    straightforward waywhen the how and why are clear (i.e .factual/obvious). EX: A tornado hit Joplin, MO. The town was

    destroyed.

    RHETORICAL PATTERNS: CAUSE & EFFECT

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    5/16

    When you present arguable causes and effects, youll need to

    make sure your presentation of the how and the why is as

    straightforward and understandable as possible. This is a

    complexcause and effect relationship, and you dont want

    your readers to get confused or feel mis lead. WT uses anexample of the current scientific theor y of tornado formation

    to make the presentation of cause and e ffect clear, the writer

    uses a narrative rhetorical pattern to explain the theory. That

    means they tell the story of a tornado from formation

    onward in a chronological order.

    RHETORICAL PATTERNS: CAUSE & EFFECT

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    6/16

    Basical ly , to

    use this

    rhetor ical

    pattern you

    make a wri t ten

    venn diagram.

    Before wri t ing

    a comparison,

    you should

    sketch out a

    venn diagram

    and f i l l i t out .

    RHETORICAL

    PATTERNS:

    COMPARISON

    & CONTRAST

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    7/16

    Most importantly, use multiple rhetorical patterns in your

    writing in different combinations to make it interesting!

    (Interesting for you to write, and in teresting for your reader to

    read. Everyone wins.)

    COMING UP: Argumentative strategies--youll notice that the

    following strategies for your entire argument are very similar

    to the previous rhetorical patterns that you can use to

    structure the info used in your paper.

    MIXING!

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    8/16

    Remember, argumentsin our context do notconnote fighting oversomething sil ly, likewhether or not yourfriend likes JustinBieber.

    We are dealing witharguable claims, whichexist in the broad area

    between personaljudgments (I

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    9/16

    In your writing youll want to attempt to define an arguable

    claimremember the purpose of our papers is to give you

    practice collecting and synthesizing information in order to

    form your own well-supported and well-reasoned conclusion. A

    claim is arguable if it cant be proven factually true or false,and neither the true nor false side of the argument is based

    solely on personal opinion.

    Your goal in inventing your argument and drafting your paper

    is to support your position to the best of your ability (441).

    But you also need to keep other viewpoints in mind. Th inkingabout people who might disagree with your view as you write

    will help you clarify your ideas and make them stronger by

    building in defenses.

    WHAT MAKES FOR AN ARGUABLE CLAIM

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    10/16

    How would you

    support this thesis?

    The few benefits

    offered by Auto-Tune

    software are highly

    outweighed by its

    negative

    repercussions on

    music culture.

    EXAMPLE PROJECT: AUTO-TUNE

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    11/16

    DEFINITION A pregnant woman who

    chooses to smoke is achild abuser who needsto be stopped before shefurther harms herunborn child.

    CAUSATION Pregnant mothers who

    choose to smoke are

    responsible for anunacceptable number ofbirth defects inchildren.

    EVALUATION Although both are

    dangerous, drinkingalcohol in moderationwhile pregnant is lessdamaging to an unbornchild than smoking inmoderation.

    RECOMMENDATION We must help pregnant

    women to stop smokingby developing smoking-cessation programs thatare specifically targetedtowards this population.

    4 SOURCES OF ARGUABLE CLAIMS( R E M E M B E R E AA C H . 1 )

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    12/16

    Good old ethos,

    pathos, and

    logos. Al l three

    of these

    argumentat ive

    strategies can

    be used to

    support your

    posi t ion.

    REASON,

    AUTHORITY,EMOTION

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    13/16

    A good argument will employ all three strategiesthereby

    leaving no possible opportunity for persuading your audience

    untouched. However, youll probably find that one mode of

    argument is more useful than the other two depending on

    your topic. Consult WT Ch . 22 p. 444 -446 for examples of E, P, L in

    action.

    E, P, L

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    14/16

    Avoid illogical fallacies by hunting out the weak spots in your

    argument and patching those holes.

    IFs occur for three major reasons:

    A false or weak premisea position based on faulty reasoning,

    authorities that are not credible, comparisons that are inappropriate Irrelevancebringing up issues that are beside the point or

    distracting by being inflammatory

    Ambiguityany time the writer intentionally clouds the issue to

    confuse readers into being persuaded

    WT p. 448 has a ch art that defines 13 common IFs anddefines them.

    ILLOGICAL FALLACIES

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    15/16

    To further bolster your argument for your position, you should,

    as mentioned before, keep the oppos ing view in mind. To

    really drive your point home, you can even acknowledge and

    rebut the opposing pointthat proves youve really done your

    homework. Methods of counter-argument

    Objective summary of your opponents position

    Recognizing validity in the opposing position

    Conceding some opposing points

    Refuting or absorbing your opponents major points

    QUALIFY YOUR CLAIMS!!

    COUNTER-ARGUMENT

  • 7/30/2019 Rhetorical Patterns & Argumentative Strategies (Project Two)

    16/16

    This is an impor tant thing to do throughout your paper, not

    just when countering potential opponents.

    If you feel strongly about your position or want readers to

    think you have strong conviction, you may be tempted to

    overstate your claimsusing strong language that betrays bias

    and immediately alerts the reader to your stance.

    By qualifying your claims, you soften your position and th e

    reader will feel that you are asking them to make up their own

    mind.

    It shows your reader that your position has some flexibility

    It acknowledges (when relevant) the difficulties or limitations of yourposition

    Your argument wi ll come across as reasonable if you present your

    claims with a more balanced viewpoint

    QUALIFYING YOUR CLAIMS