Upload
stanley-r
View
227
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HIRSCH: CURRENT INDUCED IN AN ORDANCE CIRCUIT
RF CURRENT INDUCED IN AN ORDNANCE CIRCUIT
Stanley R. Hirsch
Martin-Marietta CorporationDenver, Colorado
INTRODUCTION
Summary
This paper describes and evaluates six meth-ods for predicting RF induced current in a typicalordnance circuit found in airplanes, missiles, or
space vehicles. The calculations here were
based on an incident RF field of 100 watts per
square meter at 2 megacycles.
Conclusions
Method 6, which is preferred, considers thesingle shielded portions of the circuit as a loopantenna then assumes that the effective apertureis the total area encompassed by the loop. Basedon Method 6, the typical ordnance circuit as de-picted in Fig. 1 is compatible with an electro-magnetic field up to 100 watts per square meterstrength. Method 6 yields 900 ma under theworst conditions, whereas the no fire currentis usually one ampere. However, our reliabil-ity people estimate the probability of all theassumptions occurring simultaneously is lessthan 0. 0000001, which is normally the prob-ability of failure of a missile structure notcompleting its mission.
If the mismatch between the bridgewire re-
sistance and the characteristic impedance of theattached twisted pair is considered, the voltagereflection coefficient
Pm 111
1 - IKI2 1 -(0.99)2 1 - 0. 9801
1
0.0199 0-2,where
P = Power delivered to the load
pm
Power that would be delivered where
the system is matched.
Current would be reduced by the square root ofthe power, or about 7. Therefore, instead of0. 900 there would be 129 ma through the bridge-wire (see results of Method 6).
BACKGROUND
Ambient RF fields (due to radars, microwavetransmitters, or other sources) may induce suf-ficient current in ordnance circuits to cause inad-vertent squib firing.
A typical ordnance circuit (Fig. 1) has beenanalyzed based on the assumptions in Chapter III.
Rl
z - z
P KK RR ZR +Z
0.25 - 50 (Ref 96)
50. 25
KR = ° 990
Z0= Characteristic impedance
R + jwL ohms (Ref 5, p 34)G + jwC
ZR Receiving end impedance (Loadimpedance or terminating imped-anc e)
Then, from Ref 4, p 569, mismatch loss = p
Bus
Fig. 1-Typical ordnance circuit.
1965 15
16
Fig. 1-Typical ordnance circuit (cont).
Blind use of the equations as found in the text-
books, papers, and other source literature can
lead to impossibly high or misleading low currentvalues.
ASSUMPT IONS
Each of the following assumptions would tendto decrease the actual current; therefore, thecalculated values are an unrealistically high max-
imum value of induced current:
1) The circuits are assumed to be hanging infree space and intercepting the maximumincident electromagnetic field;
2) Attenuation of the line is assumed to bezero;
3) All connection elements are assumed com-
plex conjugates (there are no losses due to
mismatch);
4) Access doors are open; therefore, enclo-sure skin attenuation is assumed to be zero;
5) An incident electromagnetic field of 100watts per square meter field strength (194volts per meter field intensity) is assumedto be continuously impinging upon the entireordnance circuit;
6) Resonance is assumed to exist at all fre-
MARCH
quencies;
7) Induced currents add algebraically ratherthan vectorally. Therefore, for Methods 1thru 5, the result is multiplied by twentybecause there are about twenty 2-in.lengths in Fig. 1 acting as theoretical an-
tennas.
METHODS
Method 1. The length that a shield may bestripped when making connections to either a ter-minal board or connector is limited to 2 in. bythe manufacturing processes. Method 1 assumes
that the unshielded length acts as a small dipoleantenna. Effective aperture and the resistance ofthe 2-in. length were calculated and substitutedinto an equation for induced current.
Method 2. This method substituted effectivelength instead of effective aperture. The maxi-mum of 2 in. was used as effective length. Ter-mination resistance of the remainder of thecircuit was calculated at 2 mc.
Method 3. Voltage induced in a 2-in. lengthwas computed. Characteristic (or surge) imped-lance of a twisted pair of #20 wire was calculated.The induced voltage was divided by the surge im-pedance to obtain a surge current.
Method 4. This method calculates the com-
plex impedance (mostly reactance) for each wire(at 2 mc) and divides this into the voltage inducedin the 2-in. length.
Method 5. The voltage induced in a 2-in.length is divided by the entire circuit impedance.
Method 6. The effective aperture is consid-ered as the area encompassed by the singleshielded wire in the current limiting resistor(Rl, Fig. 1) portion of the circuit. The resist-ance of the entire circuit at 2 mc is considered as
the terminating resistance.
RESULTS
Current Induced in theMethod Circuit at 2 mc (amp)
1 126, 600 (for 20 two-inch lengths)
2 13. 72 (for 20 two-inch lengths)
3 3. 94 (for 20 two-inch lengths)
4 4. 2 (for 20 two-inch lengths)
5 0. 0672 (for 20 two-inch lengths)
6 0.9
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
Description of Wires
Wire LengthNumber (in.) Type Notes
A 65 #12 TPSJ Paired with F
B 107 #20 TPSJ Paired with C
C 108 #20 TPSJ Paired with B
D 12 #16 Single Shield
E 14 #16 Single Shield
F 65 #12 TPSJ Paired with A
G 93 #12 TPSJ Paired with J
H 33 #14 Single Shield
I 32 #14 Single Shield
J 90 #12 TPSJ Paired with G
Note: 1. TPSJ is twisted pair, shielded, jacketed.2. Shields are terminated on one end.
HIRSCH: CURRENT INDUCED IN AN ORDANCE CIRCUIT
EVALUATION OF METHODS
Method 6 is the most logical approach. Con-sidering the effective aperture to be actual looparea is sufficiently pessimistic, particularly ifall the assumptions above are true.
Method 1 can be ignored because the effectiveaperture of a 2-in. dipole has no meaning. Fur-thermore, the equation used to derive effectiveaperture would yield an impossibly high area.
Method 2 is similar to Method 5 except that thereal part of the terminating impedance is consid-ered as the load seen by each 2-in. length.
Methods 3 and 4 are similar and should beexpected to yield similar results. Results sup-
ported this.
Method 5 ignores the loop antenna effect of thesingle shielded portion of the circuit (particularlythe current limiting resistor and its leads).
Induced Current-Method 1
Derivation of Equation for Induced Current.The power (W) in watts in the terminating imped-ance (Z ) of an antenna is:
W =I Rt (Ref 2, p 43)t
[11
where I is the current produced through Zt and Rtis the real part of Zt
I R 377A = t
e 2E[51
Solving for the induced current:
2AI =5/ e
377 Rt
[61
I is in amperes, E in volts/meter, A in square
meters, and R is in ohms.
High Frequency Resistance of Copper Wire.Reference 3 contains information for calculatingthe high frequency resistance of copper wire:
R 2 828+ 250
[7]
R is the resistance in ohms at frequency (f)
f is the frequency in cps
R is the dc resistance in ohms0
x 10 da
d diameter of the wire in centimeters
a = 0. 01071.../T
The resistance of each wire at 2 mc is shownin Table 1.
Effective aperture A is related to the power
by:
A = W/P (Ref 2, p 43)e
(2]
where P is the Poynting Vector (power density) in
watts/square meter.
Substituting Eq [ 1] in Eq [2]:
A IR IPe
[3]
However,
P = E2/Z (Ref 2, p 44) [4]
where E is the field intensity in volts/meter andZ is the intrinsic impedance of the medium. Forfree space, Z = 120r 377 ohms.
Table 1 Wire Number vs Resistance at 2 mc
Substituting Eq [4] in Eq [3]:
1965 17
dc Resistance R at 2 mc LengthWire No. (ohm) Fac tor (ohm) (in.)
0.0119 11.25 0.1 34 90
A 0.00864 11.Z5 0.0970 6 5
B 0. 0891 4. 6 0.41 0 107
C 0.0899 4.6 0.413 108
D 0.00396 7.18 0.0 Z84 1 2
E 0.00462 7.18 0.0332 14
Ez 0.00865 11.25 0.972 65
G 0. 0 1 Z 3 7 11. Z5 0. 1 39 9 3
H 0.00439 8.95 0. 392 33
I 0.006656 8.95 0.0596 32
Resistor RI 1.6 *5 8.0
Br idg e w i r e 0.2 5 *4 1. 0
2.09 10.8044 619
*Estimated
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
Calculation of Factor from Table 1.
Rf = R (x + 0. 25)
Factor.,c X + ohmns
Gauge dia (cm) 10 da 2.828 2.828 (per 1000 ft)
#20 0. 08118 12.3 4.35 4.6 10.15
#16 0. 1291 19.55 6.93 7.18 4.016
#14 0.1628 24.6 8.7 8.95 2.525
#12 0.2053 31 11 11. 25 1. 588
x = 10 da
d = diameter in cm
a = 0.01071VT
a 0.01071 Vx10 = 15.144 at 2 mc
IOa - 151. 44.
Equations for Calculating Effective Aperture.Reference 1 gives these equations for finding the
effective aperture (Ae):
For a half-wave dipole, A - 64% for [8e 4 -t
unshielded lead lengths < 0. 5 %. (Ref 4, p 703)
where % is the wave length in meters;
3 x 10 meters/secfreq in cycles/sec
G%2A = (Ref 4, p 676) [9
e 4 c
R of a 2-in. length of #20 wire = 60 6
ohms/ft - 0. 00159 ohms for a 2-in. length.
R at 2 mc = 0. 00159 x 4.66 0. 00732 ohms.
3 x 0Wave length at 2 mc (Eq [4]), - 6= 150
2 x 10
meters. X2 = 150 = 22, 500 square meters.
Effective aperture (Eql8]),
1. 642 1.64 x 22, 500A = =- =e 4it 12.56
- 2940 square meters.
E AInduced current (Eq[6]), I 37
t
37, 700 x 2940 294, 000377 x 0. 00732 0. 00732
40 x 10 = 6330 amp for one two-inch-length.
Evaluation of Method 1. The result is too highto be acceptable. Analysis of the method yieldstwo fallacies:
1) Use of the resistance of the 2-in. length isincorrect. Resistance of the rest of thecircuit should have been used;
2) The equation for effective aperture cannotbe used for these conditions. The veryconcept of effective area for a 2-in. lengthof wire is meaningless.
Induced Current-Method 2where
G =5 (L is unshielded lead length) [10]
Substituting Eq (101 in Eq [91
A 5LEe 16r [11]
Calculation of Induced Current in a 2-in.Dipole Antenna. For a field of power density P =
2100 watts/square meter, using Eq [4] E = PZ
Still using Eq[6], but substituting effectivelength (chosen at 2 inches to give a maximumvalue) and the resistance of the remainder of thecircuit at 2 mc for Rt, the current induced in the
circuit is:
I- 7, 700 x 0. 0508 meters377 x 10. 8
- 0. 686 amp for one two-inch length.
Induced Current-Method 3
E = \/100 x 377 = V/37700 Z 194 volts/meter.
From Eq [3] the factor for #20 is 4. 6.
The equation V = E9 (Ref 2, p 50) is used, [12]
where E is the effective field intensity at a shortdipole ( \/ 10 or shorter)
18 MARCH
195HIRSCH: CURRENT INDUCED IN AN ORDANCE CIRCUIT
e is the length of the dipole
V is the voltage induced in the dipole.
III E - 9.86 volts 0. 197 amp0
for one two-inch length.
Calculation of Induced Voltage in Short Dipole. Induced Current-Method 4
E 194 volts/meter
0. 0508 meters
V EQ = 194 x 0. 0508 = 9.86 volts.
Calculation of Characteristic Impedance (ZO).For a lossless line (Chapter III. 2), the charac-teristic impedance (Z )is
Z=4 -[13]o C
where
L is in henrys/unit length
C is in farads/unit length
Z is the impedance seen by the wave as it
travels down the line.
The capacitance (C) for the twisted pair of #20
wire used is 77. 8 x 10 farads/ft.
The inductance is given by
[14]
Method 4 uses Eq [12] to calculate the voltageinduced in a 2-in. length of unshielded wire, thendivides this voltage by the impedance, whichconsists mainly of reactance at the frequenciesselected. The twisted pair of #20 wires, B andC, are connected to the bridgewire (Fig. 1).These wires are considered as a transmissionline fed by a generator of 9. 86 volts (Fig. 2).
Conditions. G and R (Fig. 2) are considerednegligible. If G is not negligible, it will shortsome of the current flowing, causing still lesscurrent to flow to the next part of the line. If Ris not negligible, it will reduce the current flow-ing in the circuit, and will also reduce the cur-rent transmitted to the next section of line.
calculations (at 2 mc). The pair of wiresfrom the bridgewire are 108 in. long. Twoinches of shield on each end are stripped back,giving a length of 104 in. as the terminating cir-cuit. The capacitance and inductance of #20TPSJ (twisted pair, shielded, jacketed) are 77. 8
picofarads/ft and 16.4 x 10 henrys/in.77.8 -12
For 104 in., C =7 x 104 x 1012
674 picofarads.
L = 16.4 x 10 x 104 = 170.6 x 10 henrys
X = 2ftf = 2 x 3.14 x 2 x 106 = IZ.56 x 10where
L is the inductance in henrys/meter
B is spacing between the wires
r is the radius of a wire
- 4 ln 4 = 1.386 4 In 4 = 5.444 4 In 4 + 1r
6.444
-7L = 10 (6. 444) henrys/meter x 0.3048 ft/meter
= 1.96(o henrys /ft
1 9-
x 10 57.96x10 vrZ~5Z S0 ohms.
0 77. 8 x 10 12
6 -12 = 8W~C 12. 56 x10 x 674x10 8460 x106
- =118
Induced Current.Fig. 2-Representation of a short section of wire as a
transmission line.
191965
io- 7ln
B+I = L
r
20
-L= 12.56 x 10
Neglecting R, Z
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY b
6 170.6 x 10 7 =214 Capacity vs Gauge.
1 Twisted Pair Shielded Wire=X= wL-
Gauge Capacity (picofarads/ft)
Z 214 - 118 = 96 ohms
V 986 v= 0. 105 amp in one wire
Z 96 ohmsdue to an antenna of 2 in. The current inthe bridgewire circuit is then 2 x 0. 1050. 210 amp for one two-inch length.
Induced Current-Method 5
The impedance is calculated for the entire loopas a series circuit. The induced voltage in a2-in. length is divided by the impedance. Tables1 and 2 contain the values used for calculations.
Table 2 Wire and Component Characteristics
Impedance of Current Limiting Resistor (Rl)
R 1.6 ohms
L = 40 x 10 henrys
!ARCH
#12 120.3
#14 110
#16 98 (96 used to simplifycalculations)
#20 77.75
Sample Calculations for Table 3.
#14.
C 100 x 1012 farads/ft
-12~108 x 10 farads/ft
9 x 10 1 farads/in.
2 x 105 cps,cw = 12.56 x 10
5 -12wC 12.56 x lOx 9 xlO 113 x 10
1 1 x 10= 8. 85 x 10 ohms/in.
WDC 113
#16.
C = 98 x 10 farads/ft -8 x 10 farads/in.
5xIxo cps 12. 56 x 10
Frequency
52 x 10 12.5 x 10
2 x 10 12.5 x 10
2 x 10 12.5 x 10
2 x 108 12.56 x 108
2 x 109 12.56 x 109
F = (L (ohms)(R is negligible)
50. 24
5 -12 -7
C 12.56 x 10 x 8 x 10 = 100 x 10
0 = 1 x 10 ohms / in.'D)C I
2
502.4
5, 024
50, 240
502, 400
2 x 1010 12.56 x 1010
#20.
C = 77. 75 x 10 farads/ft . 6. 5 x 10 12
fa rads / in.
5 - 12 -7C 12.5x 10 x6.S5xlIO = 81.S5xlO0
I = 5=x 10 os51. 25 x 10 ohms/in.
WC 81. 5
#20 = 10. 1Q/1000 ft = 0. 01Q/ft = 0.000833 0 /in.
#16 = 4.0 Q/1000 ft = 0. 000330/in.
#14 = 2.5Q/1000 ft = 0.0025Q/ft 0.0002080/in
#12 = 1.6Q/1000 ft = 0.0016Q /ft= 0. 000133Q /in
Vendor Wire to Resistor = #16 Squib = 0. 25 7
Vendor Wire to Contactor = #14 RI = 1.6Q
1.
5, 024, 000
HIRSCH: CURRENT INDUCED IN AN ORDANCE CIRCUIT
Table 3 Inductive and Capacitive Reactance in Ohms/Inch
#12.
C = 120.3 picofarads/ft = 10 x 10 farads/in.
5 -12wC = 12.56 x 10 x 10 x 10
1 1000 x 10 8 x 104ohms/in.w C 125. 6
Wire D - #16.
Length = 12 - 4 = 8 in.
X (ohms)Frequency (cps) L
0.2x105 0.170
2 x
2 x
2 x
2 x
Impedance of Each Wire
Wire C - #20.
Length 108 - 4 (stripped back) = 104 in.
Frequency (cps) XL (ohms) Xc (ohms) z1 (ohms)
2 x 105 22 1200 1197.8
2 x 106 22 120 98
2 x 107 220 12 208
2 x 108 2,200 1 2 2198.8
2 x 109 22, 000 0. 12 22, 000
2 x 10 220, 000 0.012 220, 000
X -21. 2 x 10 x 104 in. = 2.2 ohms at 2 x 10 cpsL
Xc 1. 25 x I0/104 =l, 200 ohns at 2xl10 cps
2 x
XL
xC
106
1 08
109
,10
XC (ohms)
1.25 x 104
1. 7 1. 25 x 103
17 125
17 0 12. 5
1,700 1.25
10 - 17,000
-3=21.2 x10 x8 =0.
0. 125
170 ohms at 2 x
Z (ohms)
1,25 x 104
1. 25 x 103
1 08
157.5
1, 7 00
17, 000
10 cps
1x10= 1.25 x 10 ohms
izi = /R + X
If R<< X,
IZi ViS
X ( L --
L C
21
x ( C) (ohms/in.)
X~~~~~~L
Frequency c (cwL) (ohms/in.) #16 #14 #12 #20
2 x 105 12.56 x 105 Z1.2 x 10-3 51x 105 S.85 x 104 S x 104 1. 25 x 1052x106 12.56x106 21.2xx1x04 8.S5x103 8x10 l.25x104
2 x 107 12.56 x 107 21. 2 x 10'I
I x 103 S. 85 x 102 S00 1. 25 x 103
2 x 108 12.56 x 108 21.2 1 x 100 88.5 80 125
2 x 109 12. 56 x 109 212 1 x 10 8.85 8 12.5
2 x 10 12. 56 x 1010 2120 1 0.885 0.8 1.25
-7 B -7L/a = henrys/meter = 10 (4 In -+ 1) = 10 x 6.444 henrys/meter B/r = 4. ln 4 = 1. 386,r7r8 41n 4 = 5. 444,
1 meter = 39.37 in. 6.444x 10 /39.37 = 1.64x 10 henrys/in. 4 In 4 + 1 = 6.444
To obtain XL for any length, multiply XL given above by length in inches.
To obtain X for any length, divide X given above by length in inches.
1965
MARCH22 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
Wire E - #16. Wire G - #12.
Length = 14 - 4 = 10 in. Length = 93 - 4 = 89 in.
Frequency (cps) L
2 x 105 0.212
2 x 106 2.12
2x 107 21.2
2 x 108 212
2 x 109 2,120
2 x1010 21,200
X 21.2 x x1x0 = 0.21L
X =- lxlO ohmsC 10
Xc (ohms)
1 x 104
1 x 103
1 00
10
0. 1
L2 ohms
Wire F - #12.
Length = 65 - 4 = 61 in.
X (ohmns) X (ohms)Frequency (cps) L C
2 x 105 1.38 1. 23 x 103
2 x 106 13.8 123
2x107 138 12.3
82 x 10° 1,380 1.23
2 x 109 13, 800 0. 123
2 x 10 138, 000 0. 0123
X 21.2 x 10 x 65 = 1.38 ohmsL
8 x104 3X - 65 1. 23 x10 ohms
Z (ohms)
1 x 104
1, 000
78.8
202
2, 119
21, 200
Frequency (cps) XL (ohmCs)X (ohms)
52 x 10 1.89 900
62 x 10 18.9 90
2 x 107 189 9
82x10 1,890 0.9
92 x 10 18,900 0.09
2 x 101 189, 000 0.009
X 21.2 x 10 x 89 = 1.89 ohmsL
8 x 1O4X =
8900 ohms
Wire H - #14.
Length = 33 - 4 = 29 in.
Z (ohms)
1, 23 0
109.2
125.7
1, 3 79
13, 800
138, 000
Frequency (cps) XL (ohms) XC (ohms)
2 x 105 0.615 3050
2x106 6.15 305
2 x 107 61.5 30.5
2 x 108 615 3.05
2 x 10 6, 150 0.305
2 x 10 61, 500 0.0305
X =21.2 x 10 x 29 = 0.615 ohmsL
x 885X' - 3050 ohmsC 29
Z (ohms)
888
81
180
1, 889
18, 900
189, 000
Z (ohm s)
3, 050
299
31
612
6, 150
61, 500
231965 HIRSCH: CURRENT INDUCED IN AN ORDANCE CIRCUIT
Wire B - #20. Wire J - #12.
Length = 107 - 4 = 103 in. Length = 90 - 4 = 86 in.
Frequency (cps) XL (ohms) Xc (ohms) Z (ohms)
2 x 105 2.18 1210 1,208
2 x 106 21.8 121 99
2 x 107 218 12.1 206
2 x 108 2, 180 1.21 2,179
2 x 109 21,800 0.121 21,800
2 x 1010 218, 000 0.0121 218, 000
X 21.2 x 10 x 103 = 2.18 ohmsL
125 x 103C 103
Wire A - #12.
Length = 65 - 4 = 61 in.
Frequency (cps) XL (ohms) X (ohms) (ohms)
2 x 105 1.29 1310 1, 309
2 x 106 12.9 131 118
2 x 107 129 13. 1 116
2 x 108 1, 290 1.31 1, 289
2 x 109 12, 900 0. 131 12, 900
2 x 1010 129, 000 0. 0131 129. 000
-3X = 21.2 x 10 x 61 = 1.29 ohmsL
80 x610 13 10 ohms
Frequency (cps) XL (ohms) Xc (ohms) Z (ohms)
2 x 10 1.82 930 928
2 x 106 18.2 93 75
2 x 107 182 9.3 173
2x 10 1,820 0.93 1,819
2 x 109 18, 200 0.093 1s, 200
2 x 10 182, 000 0. 0093 182, 000
-3X = 21. 2 x 10 x 86 = 1. 82 ohmsL
380 x 1
C 86 930 ohms
Wire I - #14.
Length = 32 - 4 = 28 in.
Frequency (cps) XL (ohms) XC(ohms)
2 x 105 0. 594 3160
2 x 106 5.94 316
2x 107 59.4 31.6
2x 10 594 3.16
2 x 109 5, 940 0.316
2 x 10 59, 400 0. 0316
X 21.2 x 10 x 28 = 0.594 ohmsL
Z (ohms)
3, 160
310
27.8
591
5, 940
59, 400
X .5 x 10 3160 ohms28
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
Circuit Impedance vs Frequency and CurrentInduced.
(60 sq in. ) of the current limiting resistor loopexposed to the incident rf field, then Eq [61yields:
Frequency Z Resistor Z Circuit I per 2-in.(cps) Z Wire (ohms) (ohms) (ohms) length I Total
2 x 10 35, 471 C: 50.24 L 35,421 0.279 ma 5.55 ma
2 x 106 3439.2 C* 502. 4
2 x 10 5530. 3 L 5, 024
2 x 10 12, 315.3 L* 50, 240
2936. 8 3.36 ma 67.2 ma
5, 904 1.67ma 33.4 ma
62, 555 0. 1575 ma 3. 15 ma
2 ~2x
",
I = EAe 19 1550377R 377 x 10.8
t= '0. 359 =0. 6 amp
637, 700 x 155
4071.6
[161"I 601550 converts square inches into square
meters.
2 x 109 123, 509 L* 502, 400 625, 909 15.75 .a
2 x 10 1, 235, 100 L* 5, 024, 000 6, 259, 100 1. 575,ua
Induced Current.
V = Ef for short dipole (Ref 2, p 50)
If E = 194 volts/meter g = 0. 0508 meters for a2-in. line
V induced = 194 x 0. 0508 9. 86 volts per 2-in.line.
There are about twenty 2-in. lengths (Fig. 1),
At 100 mc %. = 3 meters. Therefore, a 2-in. an-tenna (0. 0508 meters) can be considered a shortdipole up to 100 mc.
Method 6
If it is assumed that the effective aperturecannot be greater than the actual physical area
An additional 300 ma can be added for the 30 sqin. loop containing the motorized switch. Thetotal current induced, then, is 0. 900 amp.
REFERENCES
1. STL Interoffice Correspondence 6110-6307-DU-000 GM 6416.6-247 to A. Hoffman from M.Rosenthal entitled YLR87-AJ-3 and YLR91-AJ-3 Ordnance Initiator Ignition Leads;requirement for, 24 January 1962.
2. Krauss, John, Antennas, McGraw Hill, 1950.
3. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 39thEdition, Chemical Rubber Publishing Company,p 3022.
4. Reference Data for Radio Engineers 4thEdition, International Telegraph and TelephoneCompany.
5. Transmission Lines and Networks by W. C.Johnson, McGraw Hill, 1950.
'i:C indicates the reactive impedance is capacitive,L indicates the reactive impedance is inductive.
24 MARCH