14
Revision of DOE-STD-1189-2008, Integration of Safety into the Design Process Pranab Guha, DOE/ AU-31 Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design March 2015 1

Revision of DOE-STD-1189-2008, Integration of Safety into ...efcog.org/wp-content/uploads/Wgs/Safety Working... · DOE-STD-1189-2008, Integration of Safety into the ... Roland Frenck

  • Upload
    ngonga

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Revision of DOE-STD-1189-2008,

Integration of Safety into the Design Process

Pranab Guha, DOE/ AU-31

Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design

March 2015

1

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

DOE-STD-1189

Reason for Revision

2

5-year periodic review required per DOE Order(O) 252.1A,

Technical Standards Program

A critical supporting standard for the following

directives/standards, all of which have been revised since 2008

• DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the

Acquisition of Capital Assets, 11-29-2010

• O 420.1C, Chg 1, Facility Safety,

• DOE-STD-3009-2014, Preparation of Nonreactor Nuclear

Facility Documented Safety Analysis

Secretarial commitment in DOE Implementation Plan, dated

Sept 26, 2011, in response to DNFSB Recommendation 2010-1

Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

DOE-STD-1189

Actions Completed

3

Conducted 13 conference calls and meetings with DOE

Program Offices, sites and contractors – collected their

experiences in using STD-1189:

• What’s working

• What’s not working

• What improvements would be helpful

Developed objectives for the revision based on these meetings

Developed Project Justification Statement (PJS)

PJS received concurrence by all organizations

Developed list of team members to support revision

Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

DOE-STD-1189

Scope of Revision

4Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

Provide consistency with DOE O 420.1C.Chg.1, DOE O 413.3B,

STD-1020-2012, and STD-3009-2014

Evaluate Appendices A, B, C, and D for potential relocation to

more appropriate technical standards or handbooks

Update format to be consistent with industry codes and

standards

Clarify requirements for change control of safety design

documents and support of the critical decision milestones

Clarify requirements for identifying ‘major modification’ projects

Streamline format of CSDR and PDSA to be in-line with DSA

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

DOE-STD-1189

Scope Details

Provide consistency with DOE O 420.1C. Chg 1,

DOE O 413.3B, STD-1020-2012, STD-3009-2014:

• Significant changes were made in above listed directives

since DOE-STD-1189 was issued, such as, requirements

for confinement ventilation systems, Fire Protection,

NPH design, use of industry codes and standards,

hazard analysis, co-located worker safety, chemical

safety, defense-in-depth, and critical decision processes.

5Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

DOE-STD-1189

Scope Details, cont.

Evaluate Appendices A, B, C, and D for potential

relocation to more appropriate technical

standards or handbooks:

• Intent is not to duplicate requirements; DOE-STD-1189

will focus on ‘design process requirements’, not ‘design

requirements’ or ‘safety analysis requirements’.

• Many of the requirements in Appendices A-D are

addressed in DOE O 420.1C. Chg 1, DOE-STD-1020 and

DOE-STD-3009.

6Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

DOE-STD-1189

Scope Details, cont.

Update format to be consistent with industry

codes and standards:

• Any revision to DOE standards should follow industry

practices

• Clear requirements statements

• Separate requirements and guidance

7Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

DOE-STD-1189

Scope Details, cont.

Clarify requirements for change control of safety design

documents and support of the critical decision milestones

• Provide flexibility with CD process vs. design status

• Provide guidance for combined CD-2/3

Clarify requirements for identifying ‘major modification’

projects

• Use of graded approach for documentation requirements

and design process

• Evaluate DOE approval process

Streamline format of CSDR and PDSA to be in-line with DSA

• Possible use of DOE-STD-3009 DSA format for CSDR and

PDSA would make the process more efficient

8Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

Writing Team

9Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

Name Organization E-mail Telephone Number

Pranab Guha AU-31 [email protected] 301-903-7089

Chris Chaves AU-31 [email protected] 301-903-5999

David Compton PEC [email protected] 202-586-1034

P.K. Niyogi NE-31 [email protected] 301-903-2421

Bob Lowrie URS [email protected] 803-502-9635

Brad Evans PNNL [email protected] 509-371-7386

Kevin Kimball Y-12 [email protected] 865-576-6675

Andrew Vincent SRS [email protected] 803-557-9989

Charles Maggart DOE-ID [email protected] 208-526-1701

William Shields PEC [email protected] 540-692-1590

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

Review Team

10Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

Name Organization E-mail Telephone Number

Ruben Sanchez MA-63 [email protected] 202-586-7581

Roland Frenck NA-APM [email protected] 301-903-2255

Kim Loll NA [email protected] 301-903-6369

Kim Davis-Lebak FMC/LASO [email protected] 505-667-5105

Carol Sohn SC [email protected] 509-375-2320

Chip Lagdon CNS [email protected] 202-586-0799

Bob Nelson EM-41 [email protected] 509-376-8800

Tom Temple SRS [email protected] 803-208-8772

Kelli Markham NE-3 [email protected] 301-903-9252

Chris Honkomp EM Projects [email protected] 202-586-8162

Bob Boston DOE-ID [email protected] 202-526-8932

Jim Goss DOE-NPO [email protected] 865-574-4335

Mark Mitchell EFCOG/LLNL [email protected] 925-422-8600

Robert Miklos INL/NLDC [email protected] 208-533-7760

Jim O’Brien AU-30 james.o'[email protected] 301-903-1408

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

Responsibility of Review Team

Will play an important role providing guidance and advice

based on their accumulated knowledge to ensure the revised

Standard will be an effective tool for project success

Will review/comment on pre-RevCom versions

Will participate in RevCom review and comment

Will help resolve issues that emerge during DOE-wide

review, as requested

11Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

DOE-STD-1189 Revision

Schedule

Kickoff meeting – October 2014

1st draft to Review Group – April 2015

Pre-RevCom review – September 2015

RevCom release – November 2015

Issue final DOE-STD-1189 – November 2016

(Schedule dates are based on issuance date of DOE-STD-3009-2014

by November, 2014)

12Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

Proposed New Format and

Current Status

Proposed new format:

Sec. 1 – Introduction (Scope and Applicability)

Sec.2 – Acronyms and Definitions

Sec.3 – Project Management

Sec.4 – Integration of Safety into the Design Process

Sec.5 – Integration of Safety into Facility Modification

Sec.6 – References

App A – Overview of Project Management and Safety-In-

Design Process

13Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

DOE-STD-3009-2014 Roll-outAU

DOE-STD-1189

Contacts

Pranab GuhaTeam Lead, AU-31, 301-903-7089

Garrett SmithDirector, AU-31, 301-903-7440

14Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security