42
REVISED June 2013 STATE MATERIALS OFFICE

REVISED June 2013

  • Upload
    zytka

  • View
    41

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

STATE MATERIALS OFFICE. REVISED June 2013. Materials Certification. Goals in this Session. To understand: Why we certify The Sampling & Testing process The Project Certification process The EAR/DDM process The Project Administrator’s Statement What an Exception is, and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: REVISED June 2013

REVISED June 2013STATE MATERIALS OFFICE

Page 2: REVISED June 2013

Goals in this Session

To understand: Why we certify The Sampling & Testing process The Project Certification process The EAR/DDM process The Project Administrator’s Statement What an Exception is, and The Certification process & tools available

Page 3: REVISED June 2013

Why Certify?

Page 4: REVISED June 2013

23 CFR 637B

Federal Aid Policy Guide Sampling & Testing Program

Material Certification (MM 5.4)and MM 5.2 for LAP projects

Sampling, Testing & Reporting Guide

Page 5: REVISED June 2013

Field S & T: An Overview

Does it meet Specs?

QC Testing

Verification Testing

EAR

Remove &

ReplaceNo

ResolutionNoDo they

Compare?

Yes

MaterialAccepted

Yes

Page 6: REVISED June 2013

Project Material Certification

Page 7: REVISED June 2013

ComponentsMaterials Engineer’s Certification

Contractor’s FinalCertification

PA’s MaterialsStatement

Contractor’s MonthlyCertification

Approved EARFor failing Material

Passing & VerifiedQC results

Reported Test Results

Page 8: REVISED June 2013

Monthly Checklist Items

Verify the area represented contained acceptable material

Verify all material issues are resolved Verify Exceptions are complete and

accurate Verify the Exceptions match w/ Pay

penalties Verify all supporting certifications for

materials accepted by certification are received and meet specifications

Page 9: REVISED June 2013

Engineering Analysis Report

Page 10: REVISED June 2013

A report prepared by an approved licensed engineer providing analysis of failing material left in place

Evaluation of affected material, e.g., Analysis of additional samples, Life Cycle Cost Analysis, etc

Reporting structural adequacy with reference to the design criteria

“Disposition of Defective Material” form

What is an EAR?

Page 11: REVISED June 2013

EAR Processing

Contractorsubmits EAR w/

recommendation to PA

PA. authorizesuse Of EAR

PA forwardsa copy of EAR

to DME

Non-standard material

left is in place

Contractorrequests PA use Of EAR

Use EAR ?

SCE makes final decision

PA & DME set up parameters

Yes

DME reviews EARand proposes

disposition to PA

PA sends EAR &disposition to DCE

Concur ?

DCE approvesdisposition

Yes

Dispositionimplemented

No

DCE prepares recommendation

DCE forwardspackage to SCE

No

Page 12: REVISED June 2013

Project Administrator’s

Materials Statement

Page 13: REVISED June 2013

Financial Project #:

Federal Project #:

Contract #:

County:

All materials incorporated into the referenced project(s) were accepted in accordance with the STRG or pertinent contract documents and met all applicable requirements.

•Earthwork density test locations and results are in substantial compliance with the pertinent specification requirements of this project. A spot-check of the project density records indicate substantial compliance with the governing specifications, sampling and testing guides, and procedures.

•All Contractor Quality Control (QC) material test results have been verified in accordance with contract requirements. The final disposition of all material represented by QC results has been accurately documented.

•All required certifications and/or certified test reports have been received in accordance with contract requirements.

Page 14: REVISED June 2013

• Earthwork density test locations and results are in substantial compliance with the pertinent specification requirements of this project. A spot-check of the project density records indicate substantial compliance with the governing specifications, sampling and testing guides, and procedures.

Page 15: REVISED June 2013

• All Contractor Quality Control (QC) material test results have been verified in accordance with contract requirements. The final disposition of all material represented by QC results has been accurately documented.

Page 16: REVISED June 2013

• All required certifications and/ or certified test reports have been received in accordance with contract requirements.

Page 17: REVISED June 2013

Exceptions

Page 18: REVISED June 2013

What are Exceptions?(to the Certification)

Material Not Meeting StandardsFor CQC Testing: Asphalt does not meet standards if C.P.F. for

a Lot is less than 90%– However, we are noting failing tests, at the

request of the Bituminous technical unit Concrete does not meet standards if

“payment tests” do not pass Earthwork does not meet standards if ‘QC’

tests do not pass and are not verified

Page 19: REVISED June 2013

What are Exceptions?(continued)

Material Not Meeting Standards (cont.)For Non-CQC Testing: Material does not meet standards if ‘V’ test

does not pass

Testing Frequency Material not tested, or tested at a frequency,

not in conformance with the Specifications and left in-place

Page 20: REVISED June 2013

Qualifications Sampling and testing performed by unqualified

technicians (when specified in the Contract documents)

Testing performed at unqualified laboratories or at qualified laboratories during a time that they were removed from the list of Qualified Laboratories

Materials produced when the production facility was not on the accepted list, and left in-place

What are Exceptions?(continued)

Page 21: REVISED June 2013

You have an Exception, how do you report it?

Description

Location

Quantity

Resolution (and at what pay)

Concurrence…obtained?

Page 22: REVISED June 2013

Example of Format

Concrete, Class IV

The following Quality Control and Verification samples did not compare within the required tolerance. Resolution was not performed therefore these areas are not verified.

Sample Station Result (psi) Quantity (cy)CC4006V 806+77 to 807+97 7983 22.25CC4006Q ------------------------ 9330 -------

Project personnel recommended leaving the material in-place at full pay based on the QC results. The District Materials and District Construction Engineers concurred.

Page 23: REVISED June 2013

Our Review(the process & tools)

Page 24: REVISED June 2013

• Method of Acceptance –

What we look at: for all materials that have a paid qty, make sure have proper method of acceptance (examples: sampling and testing or certification)

USE: Final pay estimate for Reg. Pay Item Projects

*For Design Build and Lump Sum we use the final Job Guide Schedule

Page 25: REVISED June 2013

• Open Samples

Use: Sample Status Progress Report and Samples Not Tested Report

The samples on these reports need follow up. They may need to be processed through LIMS (from receipt to approval)

Page 26: REVISED June 2013
Page 27: REVISED June 2013
Page 28: REVISED June 2013
Page 29: REVISED June 2013
Page 30: REVISED June 2013

• Failing Material

USE: Samples with Disposition other than Full Pay per Spec (FS) Report

For material not meeting standards.

Do we have a DDM documenting resolution and concurrences?

Page 31: REVISED June 2013
Page 32: REVISED June 2013

• Unqualified Personnel and Labs

When contracts specify to have qualified technicians and labs

Requirements will be under spec book Section 105 for both personnel and labs.

Need justification and how accepting material tested by unqualified personnel or labs

Page 33: REVISED June 2013

• Material Certifications

USE: Required Certification Tracking Report to determine certifications that need to be sent to Gainesville

Make sure only those certifications that come to Gainesville are logged in LIMS

Others (sampled by PP tested by PP) are scanned into Hummingbird with the project files

• Random Sampling Program

For more information, see section in the Materials Manual 5.6.15

Page 34: REVISED June 2013
Page 35: REVISED June 2013

• Individual Material Review

For example: Earthwork, Concrete, Asphalt, Reinforcing Steel and all other materials

Make sure sampling and testing frequency is met per specifications

Since, at times the data entry in LIMS is less than adequate (garbage in, garbage out), we need additional information

Page 36: REVISED June 2013

Data for Base LOTS

Frequency: One QC test per 8 LOTSOne VT test per 16 LOTS (every 2 QC)

Page 37: REVISED June 2013

Data for Structural Concrete LOTS

Frequency: One QC test per 50 cy or day’s productionOne VT test per 4 LOTS (same mix design)

Page 38: REVISED June 2013
Page 39: REVISED June 2013
Page 40: REVISED June 2013

• Please submit the steel sample as soon as it is received at the project, do not wait until final acceptance

• The SMO Lab will store an unidentified sample for 2 weeks before it is discarded

• If your sample is discarded deliver one of the “hold” samples with the appropriate paperwork– Copy of LIMS C22, tag and mill analysis– Do not login a separate LIMS entry for the “hold”

sample . The LIMS ID for the original sample will be used for the “hold” sample

– LIMS life cycle must be completed

Steel Samples

Page 41: REVISED June 2013

Wrap-upWe discussed: Why we certify The Sampling & Testing process The Project Certification process The EAR process The Project Administrator’s Statement What an Exception is The certification review, and Tools to use

Page 42: REVISED June 2013

• Questions• Comments