8/12/2015 Manuscript Submission and Review System: View Reviewer Feedback

http://vps.ieee-ies.org/submit-cgi-bin/authorviewpaprev.pl 1/2

IEEE Industrial Electronics Society

IECON 2015

IEEE IECON15 Manuscript Submission System

Comments from Reviewers Regarding Your Manuscript

YD-005479

Manuscript Information

View the submitted manuscript

Contact Person

Name (first, last): Dr. Mrinal Kanti SarkarAffiliation: Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT Durgapur, India, IndiaE-mail: itsmrinal2u@gmail.com

Address: Dr. Mrinal Kanti Sarkar Hardware Lab, Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT Durgapur IndiaTelephone: +91-9434406937Facsimile:

Manuscript

Title: DSP Based Implementation of Piecewise Linear Control Scheme for wide air-gap control of an Electromagnetic Lavitation SystemAuthors: Mrinal Kanti Sarkar, Subrata BanerjeeTechnical Track: TT Control System and Its ApplicationsMain Keywords: CC-50. Controller Hardware/Software CC-00. Computer and Control Systems

Author Database

1st author: Dr. Mrinal Kanti Sarkar, Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT Durgapur, India <itsmrinal2u@gmail.com>2nd author: Prof. Subrata Banerjee, Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT Durgapur, India <bansub2004@yahoo.com>

Technical Details

Transaction Number: YD-005479

Data Type: pdfDate: 1431095979Origin: 117.214.3.93/117.214.3.93Status: OK - submission completed

Feedback from the Reviewers

C. Clarity of presentation: English grammar and spelling are proper ------------------------------------------ [3 - I agree] Mathematical symbols and equations are easy to understand ------------------------ [3 - I agree] Figures and tables are well constructed and informative -------------------------- [3 - I agree] The paper is well organized ------------------------------------------------------ [2 - I am neutral] Considering the issues above, the paper is readable ------------------------------ [2 - I am neutral] T. Technical innovation and relevance The authors cite other relevant publications ------------------------------------- [3 - I agree] Authors describe relevance of work to the research field ------------------------- [2 - I am neutral] The authors apply sound technical approaches ------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral] New ideas are convincingly and logically described ------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral] Results are convincing ----------------------------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral]

8/12/2015 Manuscript Submission and Review System: View Reviewer Feedback

http://vps.ieee-ies.org/submit-cgi-bin/authorviewpaprev.pl 2/2

Considering the issues above, this work should be presented --------------------- [2 - I am neutral] Comments:should include the comparative evaluations/discussions with conventional approaches, to clarify the effectiveness of the proposed one.

C. Clarity of presentation: English grammar and spelling are proper ------------------------------------------ [3 - I agree] Mathematical symbols and equations are easy to understand ------------------------ [3 - I agree] Figures and tables are well constructed and informative -------------------------- [3 - I agree] The paper is well organized ------------------------------------------------------ [3 - I agree] Considering the issues above, the paper is readable ------------------------------ [3 - I agree] T. Technical innovation and relevance The authors cite other relevant publications ------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral] Authors describe relevance of work to the research field ------------------------- [2 - I am neutral] The authors apply sound technical approaches ------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral] New ideas are convincingly and logically described ------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral] Results are convincing ----------------------------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral] Considering the issues above, this work should be presented --------------------- [2 - I am neutral] Comments:This paper deals with a piecewise linear control formagnetic levitation system. Contribution of this paper isnot strong. Authors should compare their proposed controlwith other existing state-of-art controls.

The following is a minor comment:In the title "Lavitation" -> "Levitation".

C. Clarity of presentation: English grammar and spelling are proper ------------------------------------------ [2 - I am neutral] Mathematical symbols and equations are easy to understand ------------------------ [3 - I agree] Figures and tables are well constructed and informative -------------------------- [3 - I agree] The paper is well organized ------------------------------------------------------ [3 - I agree] Considering the issues above, the paper is readable ------------------------------ [3 - I agree] T. Technical innovation and relevance The authors cite other relevant publications ------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral] Authors describe relevance of work to the research field ------------------------- [3 - I agree] The authors apply sound technical approaches ------------------------------------- [3 - I agree] New ideas are convincingly and logically described ------------------------------- [1 - I disagree] Results are convincing ----------------------------------------------------------- [3 - I agree] Considering the issues above, this work should be presented --------------------- [1 - I disagree] Comments:The piecewise linear control scheme used in the paper seemsto be a standard technique. Further, there are lots ofresearches that focus on control problems of electromagneticlevitation systems having a large air-gap. Therefore, thecontribution of the paper is obscure.

Accepted or Rejected?

The manuscript is on the list of accepted manuscripts.The manuscript is not on the list of rejected manuscripts.

The manuscript is not on the list of withdrawn manuscripts.The manuscript is not on the list of registered manuscripts.

Done Viewing