65
Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions NMR: magnetic transitions (radio frequency)

Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions NMR: magnetic transitions (radio frequency). N uclear M agnetic R esonance spectroscopy. Some atoms act as tiny magnets. if placed in a magnetic field, will align with or against. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Review of spectroscopy

IR: vibrational transitionsUV-Vis - electronic transitionsNMR: magnetic transitions (radio frequency)

Page 2: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.1A

Some atoms act as tiny magnets

if placed in a magnetic field, will align with or against

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy

-1/2 spin state is slightly higher E: Slightly > 50% of atoms are in +1/2 state

Page 3: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.1A

Angular frequency of precession:

Values of are in radio frequency range

varies with strength of B0!

Page 4: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

The resonance condition:

If sample is hit with radiation of frequency = , we have resonance condition: spin flip! That frequency of radiation is absorbed.

Page 5: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Protons in different chemical environments have different resonance frequencies!

Key concept: chemical equivalence/nonequivalence

Page 6: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.2

These molecules have only one ‘set’ of protons

Page 7: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.2

equitorial and axial protons are NMR-equivalent

Page 8: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.2

These molecules have two ‘sets’ of protons

Page 9: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.2

These molecules have several different ‘sets’ of protons

Page 10: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.2

diastereotopic protons are non-equivalent

Page 11: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Enantiotopic/homotopic protons have equivalent resonance frequencies

5.2

Page 12: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Practice: How many sets of protons? (ie. how many 1H-NMR signals?

Page 13: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

The 1H-NMR experiment

• Put sample in strong external magnetic field• Ha protons precess at a, Hb protons at b

• Hit sample with radiation in Rf range of frequencies Ha protons absorb radiation at a, undergo ‘spin flip’ Hb protons absorb radiation at b, undergo ‘spin flip’

• Detector records which frequencies were absorbed, and intensity of each absorbance

5.3A

Page 14: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

We must use solvents without protons!

(Used to use CCl4 commonly, but it’s carcinogenic)

5.3A

Page 15: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.3B

Page 16: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

The chemical shift

(refer to 1H-NMR spectrum of methyl acetate)

TMS (tetramethyl silane) is used as a standard: set the resonance frequencies of these 12 equivalent protons equal to zero

• Record the resonance frequencies of the protons in your sample relative to TMS protons, expressed as ppm

• eg. 7.1 T magnetic field, TMS protons resonate at 300,000,000 Hz (300 MHz)

• Ha protons resonate at 300,000,621 Hz, which is 2.07 ppm higher than TMS

protons

• Hb protons resonate at 300,001,104 Hz, which is 3.68 ppm higher than TMS

protons

Page 17: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Remember: Resonance frequencies vary with strength of B0!

but . . . when expressed in terms of ppm relative to TMS, the number does not change - this is why we use ‘chemical shift’ rather than Hz (or wavelength)

example: A proton has a chemical shift of 4.50 ppm.

a)What is its resonance frequency, expressed in Hz, in a 300 MHz instrument (ie an instrument with a 7.1 Tesla magnet, where TMS protons resonate at 300 MHz)?

b)What is its chemical shift expressed in Hz?

c) What is its resonance frequency in a 100 MHz instrument?

Page 18: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Chemical shift is abbreviated by

Higher chemical shifts are said to be ‘downfield’

Most protons in organic compounds have chemical shifts from 0-12 ppm relative to TMS

TMS is (usually) no longer added to sample: resonance frequency of deuterium in solvent is used as the actual reference point (but 0 ppm is still defined as TMS signal)

Page 19: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Signal integration

The area under a 1H-NMR signal (integrations) corresponds to how many protons cause the signal

In methyl acetate, the Ha signal and Hb signal both represent three protons. Thus, the area under these signals is (approx) equal

In p-xylene, Ha corresponds to six protons, Hb to four. Ratio of peak integrations is 6 to 4, or 1.5 to 1

Page 20: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.3C

Page 21: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

The basis for magnetic non-equivalence

(why do different protons have different chemical shifts?)

The shielding effect: nearby electrons create small magnetic fields in opposition to B0. These are called ‘induced fields’.

5.4A

Page 22: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Electronegative atoms pull electrons away from nearby protons

Protons are ‘deshielded’, experience stronger Beff

Stronger Beff means higher resonance frequency: higher (downfield) chemical shift

The deshielding effect

5.4A

Page 23: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Deshielding effect drops off with distance:

5.4A

Page 24: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.4A

Page 25: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Now we can ‘assign’ peaks on the methyl acetate spectrum

Page 26: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Diamagnetic anisotropy

isotropy = ‘sameness’anisotropy = ‘difference’

Why is benzene chemical shift so far downfield?. . . more than just normal deshielding!

5.4B

Page 27: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Field from a magnet is anisotropic

at point A, you sense a field pushing northat point B, you sense a field pushing south

5.4B

Page 28: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

6 aromatic electrons form ring current, opposed to B0

But for benzylic protons, the ring current field is aligned with B0 - makes Beff stronger! Strong deshielding effect.

5.4B

Page 29: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Extreme case:

outer protons are 8.9 ppm

inner protons are -1.8 ppm (upfield of TMS signal!)inside the ring, aromatic ring current is strongly shielding

(exercise 5.5)

Page 30: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Similar argument for vinylic, aldehyde protons

Page 31: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Hydrogen-bonding protons (amines, alcohols, phenols) have variable variable chemical shifts, often >4 ppm.

H-bonding patterns effect chemical shift

Often slightly broad peaks (see spectrum next slide)

Page 32: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

(figure from section 5.6A)

Page 33: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.5A

Ha

Spin-spin coupling

Page 34: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Ha signal in 1,1,2-trichloroethane is a doublet ‘split’ by Hb

5.5A

Page 35: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Hb signal is a triplet

‘split’ by Ha

Ha and Hb are coupled - their spins interact

5.5A

Page 36: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Splitting is seen between protons that are separated by three bonds or less

n neighbors leads to n + 1 sub-peaks

H-bonded protons generally do not show coupling

Page 37: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.5A

ethyl acetate

Page 38: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.5A

Page 39: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

More examples of spin-spin coupling

5.5A

Page 40: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Coupling constants

J is expressed in Hz, not ppm - does not depend on strength of B0!

5.5B

Notice: same value of J!Function of interaction between Ha and Hb

Page 41: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

Common coupling constants

5.5B

Page 42: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.5C

Complex coupling

methyl acrylate

Page 43: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.5C

Page 44: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.5A

Page 45: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.5C

(exercise 5.9 asks you to construct a splitting diagram for Hb)

Page 46: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.5C

Often the ‘n+1 rule’ holds even when protons are non-equivalent. . . if J values are close

Page 47: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.5C

Hc is split into a sextet (5 neighbors)

Page 48: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.5C

Sometimes there is too much overlapping: just call it a multiplet (m)

Page 49: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

13C-NMR Spectroscopy

Differences from 1H-NMR:

•Only ~ 1% of carbons are 13C - much weaker signal

•Integration not meaningful: signal intensities vary (eg. carbonyl carbon signals are very weak)

•Where TMS protons resonate at 300 MHz, 13C resonates at 75 MHz

•Chemical shift range is wider - more than 200 ppm

Page 50: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.6A

Broadband decoupling: turns off C-H splitting, so we see only singlets

Page 51: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.6A

Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization Transfer experiment tells us how many protons are attached

Page 52: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.6A

another example:

Page 53: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.6A

1H-NMR spectra can get very messy . . .

Page 54: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.6A

. . . but decoupled 13C-NMR spectra usually don’t have overlapping peaks (much wider spectrum!)

Page 55: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

13C-enrichment in biochemical studies

5.6B

Page 56: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.7A

Problem: solve a structure from scratchMS: molecular ion peak at m/z = 92Combustion analysis: 52.0% carbon, 38.3% chlorine, 9.7% hydrogen(0.52)(92) = 47.8g carbon in one mole compound: this means there are 48/12 = 4 carbons(0.383)(92) = 35.2 g chlorine in one mole compound: 35.2/35.45 = 1 chlorine(0.097)(92) = 8.9 g hydrogen in one mole compound: 8.9/1 = 9 hydrogensC4H9Cl IHD = 0 (no rings or multiple bonds)

figure out fragments!

Page 57: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.7A

Page 58: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.7A

the solution:

Page 59: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.7

Another example

Page 60: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.7

fragments:

Page 61: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.7

the solution:

Page 62: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.8

phosphorylated compounds

Page 63: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions
Page 64: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.8

Page 65: Review of spectroscopy IR: vibrational transitions UV-Vis - electronic transitions

5.8

31P-NMR spectroscopy