Upload
dinhque
View
215
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Studies of AOM conducted on Mathematics Studies of AOM conducted on Subjects other than Mathematics Studies on Intelligence vs Achievement
CHAPTER IV
CHAPTER III
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
New efforts have been made in training teacher educators and, in turn,
student-teachers related to Models of Teaching, a vital area of research. By
now, few of studies have been completed in this field at M.Ed., M.Phil. and
Ph.D. levels in National and the international level. The investigator was able
to review some of these studies which have a direct bearing on the central
theme of the present study. In this section, the investigator makes a humble
attempt to report some of the important related research studies reviewed.
Intelligence was considered to be the “matching variable” in this study.
According to Guilford, the matching variable should be highly related to the
dependent variable-achievement. In order to establish the fact that
intelligence is related to achievement, a few studies reviewed are presented
at the end of this chapter.
Care has been taken to arrange the studies in chronological order. For
convenience, the studies are presented under the following heads:
1. Studies of AOM conducted on Mathematics
2. Studies of AOM conducted on subjects other than Mathematics.
3. Studies on Intelligence vs Achievement
3.1. STUDIES OF AOM CONDUCTED ON MATHEMATICS
Mathew (1997) tried to compare the efficacy of AOM with CM of
teaching mathematics at secondary school level. the AOM was more effective
in terms of student achievement.
Gopakumar (1995) compared the effectiveness of AOM and ITM on
mathematics achievement at secondary school level. The objective was to
compare the effect of AOM and ITM on mathematics achievement at
secondary school level and to compare the effectiveness of AOM and ITM on
mathematics achievement at secondary school level with reference to the
Review of Related Literature
73
instructional objectives Knowledge, Understanding and application. The
findings showed that the ITM is superior to AOM.
Raj, S. Meera (1995) studied the effect of AOM as an instructional
strategy in learning and retention of mathematics of pupils at secondary
school level. The objective were to examine the effect of AOM on
mathematics achievement in comparison with CMT when taken as a whole
and with reference to the instructional objectives Knowledge, Understanding
and Application and to examine the effect of AOM on retention scores of
mathematics achievement in comparison with CMT when taken as a whole
and with reference to the instructional objectives Knowledge, Understanding
and application. The findings showed that the AOM is superior to CMT in
mathematics achievement as well as in retention of learned materials when
taken as a whole and under the instructional objectives understanding and
application, but not significant at knowledge level.
Thomas (1995) conducted a study on the effect of mathematical
achievement in comparison with conventional method of teaching at
secondary level. The objectives were to examine the effect of AOM on
mathematics achievement in comparison with CMT with reference to the
instructional objectives Knowledge, Understanding and Application. The
findings showed that the AOM is superior to CMT under the objectives
understanding and application but not significant at knowledge level.
Preetha (1990) conducted a study to examine the effectiveness of
advance organizer model and ITM in the teaching of Mathematics in Std. VIII.
The result showed that the attainment of pupils taught using AOM was not
differing significantly from those taught using ITM. But the attainment in
Mathematics of pupils taught using AOM was significantly higher than those
taught using TM with respect to the objectives namely knowledge,
understanding, application and evaluation.
Pande, B (1986) compared the effectiveness of AO and set induction in
learning the major objective of the study were to determine the effect of AO
and set induction on achievement. The findings of the study revealed that
Review of Related Literature
74
there is no significant influence of interaction between method of instructional
criterion test and sex criterion test.
Bhalwankar (1985) made a study on the effect of expository and
guided discovery method of teaching on achievement in mathematics of
students of different levels of intelligence. The major findings of the study
were that the guided discovery and expository method were equally effective
on knowledge and comprehension objective with respect to immediate test
and retention test. The expository method was found to be more effective than
the guided discovery method on application objective with respect to students
of high intelligence.
Chitriv (1983) ascertained the comparative effectiveness of Ausubel
and Bruner strategy on the criteria of concept attainment and concept
acquisition in Mathematics. The strategy of Ausubel and Bruner were found
equally effective for teaching mathematical concepts to the 11th grade
students.
The study conducted by Jose (1980) on Cybernetic Approach to
instruction for higher education in Mathematics with special reference to India
revealed that the teaching model can be applied with appropriate modification
to instructional situations so that efficacy of mathematical instruction can be
increased several fold.
Kerston (1976) examined the effect of an AO on the learning and
retention of learning materials. It was found that there was no significant
difference between AO group and control group.
Smith C.D. (1976) studied the effect of AO and Abstract reasoning
levels on learning and retention of post secondary mathematics students. AO
was found to have more effects on long range retention.
Graber (1975) examined the use of AO and questioning. As a method
of testing, pretest – posttest experimental design was employed for the study.
The findings of the study indicated that no organizer was superior than the
other and there was no significant advantage over the level of questioning.
Review of Related Literature
75
Caponechi (1973) conducted a study on 91 undergraduate students
and examined the effect of an advance organizer as compared to an
introductory overview and a control set of historical materials on the
acquisition and retention of the topic of matrices within a normal class room
situation. The findings showed that there were a significant interaction
between thee treatment and ability level on achievement test; and no
statistical difference between the organizer and introductory overview means,
although the difference in the means favoured the advance organizer.
Nixt (1972) conducted a study on students enrolled in freeman
mathematics course to examine the relative effects of frequent use of
advance organizer and structures review in a college mathematics course for
students who are not physical science engineering or mathematics majors.
The result of the study showed that there were no significant difference for
treatment effects, recitation instructor effects not interaction.
It may be noted that even though Mathematics is an important subject,
the researches of AOM in this area has been scanty.
3.2 STUDIES OF AOM CONDUCTED ON SUBJECTS OTHER THAN MATHEMATICS
In this section, a brief description of the reviewed studies conducted on
Science, Social Science, Languages, Computer and other general subjects
are presented in chronological order.
Mayer (2004) Abstract Forty-four published research studies involving
advance organizers were reviewed. Twenty-seven studies included an
advance organizer vs. a control group (standard advance organizer study)
and 17 studies included an advance organizer vs. a post organizer group
(modified advance organizer study). Results of the studies were compared to
the predictions of several theories. In addition, four specific predictions of
assimilation theory were evaluated: that advance organizers should have a
stronger effect for poorly organized text than for well organized text, that
advance organizers should have a stronger positive effect for learners lacking
Review of Related Literature
76
prerequisite knowledge, that advance organizers should have a stronger
effect for learners lacking prerequisite abilities, and that advance organizers
should have an especially strong effect on measures of transfer rather than
retention
Raj Rani Agarwal (2004) in a study found that the Advance Organizer
Model and the Concept Attainment were found more effective than the
Conventional Method in fostering concept learning.
Keppell (2001) conducted a study which explored the development,
trial, and implementation of the Content Production Process (CPP) which was
designed to assist instructional designers in eliciting and conceptualizing
unfamiliar content from subject matter experts. Highlights include advance
organizers, schema theory, consultation practices, knowledge acquisition in
constructing expert systems.
Bastick (2001) in a study tested the common assumption that lists of
instructional objectives (LIOs) presented at the start of a lesson are used as
advance organizers (AOs). Because traditional research designs have
yielded conflicting results, an alternative design was used that sought to falsify
the necessary association between the objectives and their use that results
when AOs are used.
Callison (2000) focuses on "organizers," tools or techniques that
provide identification and classification along with possible relationships or
connections among ideas, concepts, and issues. Discusses David Ausubel's
research and ideas concerning advance organizers; the implications of
Ausubel's theory to curriculum and teaching; "webbing," a specific
organizational technique; and graphic organizers
Bastick (1999) in this study investigated the assumption that students
use instructional objectives as advance organizers. This assumption,
developed by D. Ausubel (1968), is appealing to instructors, but has been
difficult to test experimentally.
Review of Related Literature
77
DaRos and Onwuegbuzie (1999) conducted a study to determine the
effectiveness of using advance organizers in instruction at the graduate level
and found to be effective.
Chung (1999) compares Chinese Students' listening comprehension
rates for video texts using a variety of techniques: advance organizers,
captions, a combination of both, and none of the foregoing. Results showed
that more effective comprehension occurred when a combination of
techniques were used.
Hatch and Dwyer (1999) describes a study that examined the
instructional effect varying the positions of advance organizers, practice
exercises, and feedback in an instructional environment. The effect of varied
advance organizer strategies and students' locus of control orientation on
instructional and testing time were also investigated
Chung and Huang (1998) investigated the effects of three aural-
advance organizers on student comprehension of second-language (L2)
videotaped materials. Subjects were 160 low-intermediate Chinese students
of English in Taiwan. Suggests that in preparing advance organizers for
English-as-a-Foreign-Language students, teachers should focus on new
words rather than on video characters
Peterson and John (1998) describe a method for organizing the subject
matter associated with the history of economic thought. The conceptual matrix
is an organizer and visual display that cross references normative and
economic issues with their historical context. Maintains that the matrix
promotes critical thinking and allows students to focus on the issues
Story (1998) examined advance organizer research to determine its
implications for instructional designers planning learning activities and
instructional media, particularly the relationship between the forms of advance
organizer and media. Found few studies comparing forms of organizers or the
relationship between forms or organizers and media, indicating a need for
further research in these areas
Review of Related Literature
78
Thompson (1998) in experiment one, 40 younger and 40 older adults
used advance organizers with a 1500-word passage. Experiment 2 replicated
the test with adults of limited verbal ability. Advance organizers were helpful
only in restricted circumstances. They appeared to help those with limited
ability to comprehend detail.
Tyler and Reynolds (1998) used a model for incorporating feature films
into a course for training group facilitators is presented. Using cognitive-
learning theories, the authors describe how films may be used as an
advanced organizer, as the basis for student learning assessment, or as
examples of specific theory in action. Specific examples are provided.
Herron, York, Cole and Linden (1998) compared student retention of
information in foreign-language videos in two advance organizer conditions.
Participants were 67 college students enrolled in five sections of a beginning-
level French course. Findings were interpreted as supportive of the premise
that it is significantly better to incorporate an advance organizer with video
than not.
Kirkman, and Shaw (1997) conducted a study to examine the effects
of a comparative advance organizer in an oral format on learners' immediate
and delayed retention of subject matter related to food and nutrition when
controlling for learners' prior knowledge level.
Bassoppo-Moyo (1997) examines the effects of three pre-instructional
strategies--advance organizers, performance objectives, and structured
overviews--in enhancing learner understanding of textual materials. Two
achievement tests were administered to 674 pre-service teachers enrolled in
two of Zimbabwe's teachers' training colleges. Results indicated that
performance objectives were relatively superior to the other
Avery and Graves (1997) describes the Scaffolding Reading
Experience, a technique that helps students deal with challenging expository
texts and supports social science inquiry methods. This technique relies on
various supporting activities during the pre-reading, during-reading, and post-
Review of Related Literature
79
reading phases. Outlines a series of these activities used during a U.S. history
course.
Boyle and Weishaar (1997) conducted a study with thirty-nine high
school students with mild disabilities and poor reading comprehension were
trained to use either student-generated or expert-generated cognitive
organizers to improve literal and inferential reading comprehension. Following
training, both groups exceeded the reading comprehension performance of a
control group, and students using student-generated organizers had
significantly high difference in their scores than those using expert-generated
organizers.
Kiewra et al. (1997) in experiment with 109 college students examined
the effects of advance organizers and repeating a lecture on test
performance. Advance organizers that integrated subtopic information (linear
and matrix organizers) increased recall of subtopic information but more
general organizers (conventional) aided overall recall, especially general topic
information.
Kurian (1997) made an experimental study on the effect of AOM with
CM of teaching and found that in the teaching of chemistry AOM was found
superior.
Thompson (1997) in a study, randomly assigned thirty adults ages 53-
85 and 28 adults ages 19-38 were to three groups to read six passages. One
group received advance organizers prior to reading, the second got orienting
instructions plus advance organizers, and the controls received neither.
Orienting instructions significantly helped both age groups and greatly
reduced performance differences between age groups
Kang (1997) describes a study that investigated whether an advance
organizer could facilitate learning in a computer simulation environment using
HyperCard. It examined the differential effectiveness of an advance organizer
across three different grade levels--fifth, sixth, and seventh. Analyses of data
Review of Related Literature
80
showed significant differences between the organizer and non-organizer
groups.
Ruthkosky, and Dwyer (1996) examines the effect that learners' prior
knowledge has on long-term retention of information. Study (200
undergraduates) found no differences in long-term retention when prior
knowledge was controlled, no interaction between prior knowledge and
advance organizer strategies, no increased long-term retention with advance
organizers, and no increased achievement with visuals.
Chun and Plass (1996) focus on how reading comprehension can be
facilitated with a multimedia application for second language learning. Results
indicate that a dynamic visual advance organizer does aid in overall
comprehension and that annotations of individual vocabulary items consisting
of both visual and verbal information help more than verbal information only.
Chung (1996) explores two video instructional strategies for the foreign
language classroom: advance organizers and captions in the target language.
A set of classroom procedures are proposed that combine advance
organizers and captions to teach English as a foreign language
Janardhanan (1996) studied the effect of AOM as an instructional
strategy on Biology achievement of secondary school pupils. The findings
showed that there is significant difference between mean scores on
achievement of experimental and control group under the objective
understanding and application except knowledge level.
Muhammed (1996) studied the effect of AOM on Biology achievement
at secondary school level. The finding showed AOM is effective than TM at
understanding and application level.
Griffin et al. (1995) this study examined whether graphic organizer
instruction would facilitate comprehension, recall, and information transfer,
and how much explicit instruction was necessary for independent generation
of graphic organizers. Fifth graders read social studies information with or
Review of Related Literature
81
without graphic organizers and explicit instruction. Explicitness and presence
of graphic organizers facilitated students'
Herron et al. (1995) in a study on college students enrolled in an
introductory French course viewed 12 French-language videos, with 1 group
exposed to oral descriptions and pictures from the videos before viewing and
a second group exposed to only oral descriptions. Students in the description-
plus-pictures group demonstrated higher levels of comprehension than
students in the description group.
Chiquito (1995) maintains that the use of metacognitive learning
strategies have been recurrent pedagogical tools for facilitating foreign
language learning. Describes how new hypermedia and interactive video
technology have broadened the scope of computer-assisted instruction.
Hanley et al. (1995) compares the effects of two visual advance
organizers on comprehension and retention of a written passage in a FLES
(Foreign Language in the Elementary School) Program: (1) "Video" and (2)
"Pictures + Teacher Narrative". Investigators randomly assigned 62 students
to 1 one of 2 conditions. "Video" was the more effective organizer of the two.
Downing and Agnes (1995) conducted study on the effectiveness of
Advance organizer advocated for the improvement of presentation method of
teaching and expository learning based on David P. Ausubel’s theory of
meaningful verbal learning. They found that Advance organizer allowed for
oral presentation by the teacher with ensuring discussion resulted in the
greatest and efficient recall.
Philip (1995) studied the effect of AOM in teaching of economics in
standard IX. The finding showed AOM is superior to TM under instructional
objective knowledge, understanding and application.
Pande P.B. (1994), studied the effect of Advance Organizer Model and
set induction on learning and transfer among class XI students.
Downing, Agnes (1994) in her paper advocates for the improvement of
presentational methods of teaching and expository learning, based on David
Review of Related Literature
82
Ausubel's theory of Meaningful Verbal Learning and its derivative, the
Advance Organizer Model of Teaching. This approach to teaching enables
teachers to convey large amounts.
Katherine Barbee (1994) research on instructional methods has
suggested that advance organizers (e.g., metaphors) can be an effective tool
in teaching certain types of material in some situations. In many cases,
teaching computer programming concepts satisfies these criteria.
Patnaik and Mohanan (1993) investigated the effectiveness of Advance
Organizer Model on the attainment of History concepts by class VII students.
Panday N.N. and Purohit (1993) investigated the efficiency of Advance
organizer in comparison to teachers training model for learning outcome of
educational psychology of B.Ed students. The finding showed that Advance
organizer model was superior than the Traditional teaching method in
facilitating educational psychology to B.Ed students.
Saidi (1993) conducted a study on the impact of Advance Organizer
upon students achievement in computer assisted video instruction and found
that AO do not facilitate transfer of learning in computer assisted video
instruction.
Relan (1991) conducted a study on the effect of visual organizer in the
teaching of Biology. It was found that AO did have a facilitating effect on all
levels of learning outcomes.
Rincheart et al. (1991) in their study on the effectiveness of Advance
organizer on text recall by poor readers revealed that the experimental group
who used cognitive maps as Advance organizer benefited much better than
the control group.
Joseph J. (1990) conducted a study to examine the effect of CAM and
AOM in the teaching of Physics in standard VIII and found that both CAM and
AOM were effective than that of TM at Knowledge, Understanding and
Application.
Review of Related Literature
83
Pandey N. (1990) studied the effectiveness of AOM and ITM for
teaching of social science to class VIII students. The major findings of the
study revealed that with regard to achievement scores the difference between
AOM and ITM was not significant compared to the CM. The achievement
score was significantly different in AOM.
Townsend and Clarihew (1989) conducted activity on the use of
Advance organizer in facilitating children’s comprehension. They investigated
the effect of verbal and pictoral advance organizer’s. The study revealed that
the verbal organizers assist text comprehension of children with strong prior
knowledge while the addition of a pictoral component aids comprehension of
children with weak prior knowledge.
Chaudhary (1988) conducted an exploratory study to find out the
impact of teachers personality on competency in AOM and ITM. Teaching is
intended behaviour for which the aim is to induce learning since ancient times
people have tried to understand and improve instruction and teaching.
Avalos (1987) tried to determine the use of advance organizers and
organizers at the middle and end of each learning task. The findings of the
algebra study was that the use of organizer alone and the combined use of
organizers in enhancement of pre requisites and mastery learning have
significant positive effects on student learning.
Buddhisagar (1987) conducted his study in development and
comparison of instructional material developed by using AOM and operant
conditioning model for teaching educational psychology to B.Ed students. The
instructional material PLM and AOM were found to be effective in terms of
achievement of students on different criterion tests and reaction of students.
The PLM as well as AOM were found superior to the traditional method.
The research findings of Grawal and Kane (1987) were that the
Bruner’s model was more effective than Ausubels’ model and traditional
method of teaching, while the latter two did not differ from each other
significantly.
Review of Related Literature
84
Lenz (1987) investigated the use of advance organizer in activating the
inactive learners. Advance organizer did positively affect students retention of
information but only after students were taught to attend and to use the
advance organizer.
Rajoria (1987) conducted a study on the effectiveness of AO on the
achievement of students of standard VIII in science. The experimental group
with AOM is found superior to control group with traditional method
Satapathy (1987) concluded the relative effectiveness of wholistic
(SMTI) Partists (MMTI) and partist first demonstration (MMTI) approaches in
terms of theoretical understanding of the model
Swarup, Budhisagar and Rajoria (1987) studied the effect of two
instructional method with AO and without AO in terms of pupil achievement
and found that the instructional material without AO was more effective.
The study conducted by Lewis (1986) showed that either the advance
organizer or simplified reading material is significantly better than no
treatment but the two together are significantly better that either alone.
Pandey S.N. (1986) conducted a study on the effectiveness of advance
organizer and ITM for teaching social studies to std. VIII and found that both
AOM and ITM were significantly different from CM but there was no significant
difference between AOM and ITM in terms of pupil achievement.
Sathapathy (1986) compared programmed learning material, advance
organizer material and traditional materials in terms of achievement of
students studying through them and studied the effect of personality factors
and their interaction with the treatment on achievement of student. He found
that the PLM and TM were equally effective in terms of achievement of
student on criterion test. The AOM was effective that both the PLM and TM in
terms of achievement of students on criterion test.
Carnes (1985) investigated the effects of AO and the various sizes of
groups of students on achievement retention and rate of learning. It was found
that the students working in groups of 3 or 4 achieved significantly better rates
Review of Related Literature
85
of learning than students working alone, while no significant difference of
achievement or retention were observed.
Dennis (1985) investigated the effectiveness of AO and repetition on
the achievement in a High school Biology Class. The findings o f the study
revealed that there was no significant interaction between treatment on the 2
dependent variables. However there was a significant gain in achievement by
the students in all groups from pretest to posttest
Meurer (1985) drawing from linguistic cognitive psychology and
educational psychology assessed L1 and L2 reading comprehension
performance of Brazilian university students in relation to expository texts and
hierarchical levels of information distribution within the content structure of
texts and the effects of Advance organizer in the form of brief introduction.
The findings supported the use of Advance organizer as seen within.
It is seen from the findings of the study in Biology by Morgan (1985)
that there was a statistically significant facilitating effects of advance organizer
on both student achievement and student attitude.
George (1984) conducted a study on content organizer in chemistry for
standard VIII based on Ausubel’s meaningful learning. The findings showed
that Ausubelian approach of content organizer in the teaching chemistry is
superior to CM of teaching.
Miller (1984) compared the effectiveness of visual and verbal
organizers. The results showed that the experimental group scored
significantly better on immediate recall than the control group who used prose
organizer.
Livingston (1984) investigated the effects of advance organizer and
direct instruction passage on high and low ability eight grade student in the
learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. The findings showed that
the high ability subjects in Advance organizer group achieved significantly
higher scores than low ability students in their group.
Review of Related Literature
86
In a study, Lott (1983) compared inductive and deductive approaches
and reported that there was essentially no difference between the two
approaches.
Makhdom (1983) evaluated the effect of AO in facilitating the learning
of English by foreign students. The findings showed no significant difference
between nationalities by treatment interaction.
Mahajan (1983) made the objective of his study to see whether the
effect of Ausubelian advance organizer on the learning of formal operational
students was any different from their effect on concrete operational students.
The sample consisted of 305 physics students. It was found that there was a
significant interaction between the cognitive level and the absence or
presence of organizers at least as far as the immediate post test was
concerned. For the two delayed post test there was no significant interaction
as far as the composite score or scores on the recall portion of the test was
concerned.
Moore (1983) conducted a study on three groups of differing pre-
requisites skills and knowledge. The result of this research did not add
support to Ausubel’s theory.
Neol (1983) in his study on the influence of advance organizer on
transfer of rules learning concluded that while students benefit from
systematically designed instruction to rules Advance Organizer incorporated
in that instruction did not necessarily enhance learning transfer.
Vasu (1983) conducted a study on the effect of Ausubelian approach
on Biology instruction and found that Ausubelian approach was far superior to
CM of learning Biology in secondary school.
Research findings of Anne (1992) suggests that AO facilitated listening
comprehension for both learning disabled and non learning disabled group in
both narrative and expository modes. The non learning disabled group scored
significantly higher than the learning disabled group when AO were used.
Review of Related Literature
87
Bornes (1982) conducted a study on three instructional method on
Ausubel concept of meaningful learning specially the effectiveness of AO and
no AO using on expository passages. The findings of the stuffy revealed that
the use of AO had a significant effect on delayed retention level but in the
case of above level readers the AO exerted no significant influence.
Brune (1982) examined the effect of advance organizer on listening
comprehension among learning disabled and non learning disabled
adolescents in grade seven and eight. The subjects consisted of 30 learning
disabled and 30 non disabled adolescents matched for sex and grade
placement. The findings showed that Advance organizer facilitated listening
comprehension for both learning disabled and non disabled groups in both
narrative and expository modes. The non learning disabled group scored
significantly higher than the learning disabled group when Advance Organizer
used.
Chang (1982) examined the effect of filmic advance organizer on the
learning and retention of facts and concepts from a sound film by the regular
and mainstreamed educable mentally retarded learners from sixth seventh
and eight graders. The findings showed that filmic advance organizers
presented for the study appeared to provide facilitative effects for the regular
subjects in acquisition and retention of facts and concepts presented in a
consumer education film and ability levels did not differentially affect the
learning outcomes.
Lantz and Braine (1982) through their study on 8th grade physical
science students showed that AO’s benefited students of all subsumer level’s
on cognitive learning and presence of relevant subsumers in cognitive matrix
benefited students on both immediate and delayed tests.
Stone (1982) analysed long term studies of advance organizers (AO)
with Glass's meta-analysis technique. The results of the study indicated that
advance organizers were associated with increased learning and retention of
the material to be learned. This was consistent with Ausubel's prediction.
Review of Related Literature
88
It is seen from the findings of the study conducted on science learning
achievement of 8th grade students by Thamthai (1982) that the advance
organizer did have a facilitating effect on female students who were field
independent while it inhibited the science learning of field dependent female
students.
Watkins (1982) assessed the effect of Advance Organizer and
Advance Organizer with listening examples of the cognition performance and
aural discrimination of musical concepts and the skills by non music majors.
The sample consisted of undergraduate non music major from two intact
fundamentals of music. The findings of Advance Organizer and Advance
Organizer models did not indicate scores higher than baseline averages.
AOM when compared with Advance Organizers indicated increased written
test scores as well as phase mean scores for each of the two treatment
interventions.
Aman (1981) investigated the effects of the use of an AO on transfer in
programmed instruction materials situation. The result of the study indicated
that the use of AO was more effective in reducing magnitude of errors on
post test score.
Giles (1981) compared the effect of AO and clustering as mediators of
learning in lesson presented at planetariums. The clustering treatment and
AO treatment produced significantly higher performance than the control
treatment.
Haghighi (1981) tried to find out the effects of underlining cues AO and
post AO on meaningful prose learning. It was reported that both AO and
underlined cues facilitated meaningful prose learning.
Korzenowski (1981) tried to find out the effect of interspersed questions
AO and post organizer on good and poor comprehend. It was found that the
post organizer provide more helpful in the immediate recall of ideas.
Research findings of the study conducted by Moriera and Santos
(1981) suggests that the approach based on Ausubel’s theory influenced the
Review of Related Literature
89
students cognitive structure in such a way that, their conceptual hierarchies
are more coherent with the basic laws and conceptual structure of the subject
matter.
Barharas (1980) conducted a study to examine the effect of involving
the use of AO with earth science students and found that there was no
significant difference in the achievement of student after the experiment. The
investigator recommended that the pattern of the AO should be established
before the experiment started.
Darrow (1980) investigated the relative effectiveness of two pre
instructional treatment on the learning and retention of material processing
concepts by eighth and ninth grade industrial arts students on treatment
involved. The sample consisted of 178 students. The findings showed that no
significant difference was found between treatment group for either the initial
learning or the retention measure. The advance organizer and conventional
overview treatments were equally effective for both measures.
Dene (1980) tested the effect using a graphic Advance Organizer
before, during and after reading as the comprehension of written test. Sample
consisted of 197 sixth grade students. The findings indicated that although the
graphic Advance Organizer did not facilitated comprehension of single theme
text, it did facilitate comprehension of multi thematic text. The graphic
Advance organizer strengthened retention of context and below level, at level
and above level readers benefited similarly from the use of the graphic
Advance Organizer.
Morganett (1980) also found a significant effect of AO in testing the
level of knowledge on learning and retention on Social Science content.
Kneen (1979) compared the effects of two types of AO guide material
and structured overview on a comprehension of a reading task. The findings
showed ht the structured overview resulted in a significantly greater
comprehension if the reading task than did guide material evidenced by
comprehension test performance.
Review of Related Literature
90
Meena (1979) studied the effect of written and graphic comparative AO
upon learning and retention form Audio Visual presentation . This study
supported the conclusion that providing the learners with AO prior to viewing
an Audio visual presentation will enhance their ability to learn and retain
instructional content material.
Schwartz (1979) tried to grasp the effect of specially prepared AO on
level of relevant knowledge subsumed present in learners cognitive structure
and interaction of AO and subsuming level on the learning of unfamiliar
science related material at the College level. The findings provide support for
Ausubel theory regarding the ideational scaffold provided by the AO and the
facilitating effect of learning new material when the relevant prior knowledge
were available.
Geiger (1978) investigated the relation between certain personality
traits and verbal forms of Advance Organizer and determined whether
learning and retention are facilitated by the Advance organizer and if the
Advance Organizer are differentially effective among learning who
demonstrate varying degree of the selected personality traits. The sample
consisted of 81 eight grade students. It was found that Advance Organize
format did not have significant effect on learning and there was a trend for the
visual Advance Organizer group to achieve higher scores on learning and
retention.
Kahle (1978) conducted a study to find the effect of an advance
organizer and behavioural objectives on the achievement of disadvantaged
biology students. The study revealed that there was significant difference in
achievement for the experimental group and control group on the two units.
Although an immediate post test on three units showed no significant
difference between the experimental and control groups, there was a
significant difference favouring the experimental group on a retention test
administered three weeks later.
Moriera (1978) conducted a study on experimental college physics
course based on Ausubel’s learning theory using the principle of progressive
Review of Related Literature
91
differentiation. It is seen form the study that Ausubelian approach fostered
concepts differentiation, relatedness and meaningful hierarchical organization
to a greater extent that did traditional approach.
Oppong, (1978), investigated on the facilitative effects on
achievements of organizers learnt to mastery using geography material at the
ninth grade level. the result indicated that the use of advance organizer before
each text chapter, showed significant superiority in achievement when
compared with the non-organizer group using text materials only.
Thompson (1978) tried to determine the extent to which three types of
expository organizer would facilitate the verbal learning and retention
performance of selected 5th grade elementary school subjects. The findings of
the study supported the basic assumption Ausubel’s Subsumption theory that
expository AO did have a facilitating effect on acquisition and retention of
learning material.
Goodman (1977) investigated ninth and tenth geometry students to
study about the effects of treatment on the learning of a unit on descriptive
statistics. The result of this study showed no significant effect due to treatment
and no significant interaction. There was a significant effect due to ability.
Lawton (1977) reported a very carefully and complex investigation as
to whether the use of AO would effect the learning of Social Science Material
and also facilitates logical thinking in 6 and 10 year old children. The findings
of the study revealed that the effects are much stronger for the older children
especially with regard to transfer of thinking ability. If the material is presented
with an organizing structure it will increase the probability of learning and
retention of material and also the potential of influencing the logical
operations.
Rickard and Cornick (1977) conducted a study on whole versus part
presentation of AO in college students. The whole and part method of
presenting AO yielded equivalent recall passage information and the
Review of Related Literature
92
experimental groups produced significantly more recall than the group of the
organizers themselves.
Salman (1977) evaluated the utility of the Advance Organizer pre
instructional strategy using an oral mode of presentation. The sample
consisted of 96 college students. Analysis of Variance was used. It was
conducted that oral Advance Organizer or learning passages in conjunction
with either written or oral learning passages provide no differential in learning
or retention with verbally sophisticated subjects.
After analyzing the effect of AO on the meaningful learning of carefully
sequenced material. Kahle and Rastorae (1976) suggested that meaningful
learning is increased by the combined effect of organizers and sequentially
presented learning material.
Travers (1976) evaluated the effects of using AO in a laboratory inquiry
oriented physical Science course for non science majors. The findings
indicated that the use of AO did not increase the performance of the students
West and Fensham (1976) attempted to test some prediction from
Ausubel’s theory concerning the subsuming role of Advance organizer. The
study can be said to provide strong support for Ausubel proposition that the
learner’s prior knowledge structure plays a subsuming role in the new
learning.
Edward (1975) conducted a study to determine the effectiveness of
AOM which is applicable to subject of all scholastic level or for a particular
level of pupil who demonstrated a specific scholastic ability. The subjects of
the study indicated that it is benefited for all levels of scholastic ability, but it is
more beneficial for short term achievement than long term achievement.
Jones (1975) conducted a study to determine if Advance Organizer’s
generally describe as more abstract general and inclusive than the materials
they produce and also level specific which means selectively beneficial only to
subjects at a particular level of demonstrated scholastic ability. The study
Review of Related Literature
93
revealed that these are benefited for short term achievement rather than the
long term retention.
Lucas and Flower (1975) undertook a study to determine the effect of
three types of AO upon the teaching of Biological Concepts. The interactive
effects of certain student variable were also subjected to study. The result of
the study did not indicate any significant effect between the three types of AO
and scores on the achievement test. The interaction effects of the student
variable also were found significant.
Murchison (1975) explored the usefulness of advance organizer for the
teaching of science to ninth grade students and found that IQ and motivation
were each significant and treatment difference were significant.
The result of the study conducted by Slock (1975) to determine if an
advance organizer would cause short term and long term increase in students
performance of an achievement test showed that if students are appraised of
the learning experience ahead of them, they are likely to perform better than
students who are not appraised.
In a study conducted by Saretsky (1975) on eight graders resulted in
the findings that there was no significant difference for the use or non-use of
AO.
Barrow (1973) determined whether the use of an advance organizer or
historical introduction significantly influenced learning and retention in a
discovery learning unit in science at the seventh grade level. The findings of
the study did not demonstrate Joyce and Weil’s assumption that advance
organizer would effect active learning situation positively.
A study conducted by Felker (1973) on 88 introductory psychology
students found that adjunct post questions resulted in significantly superior
problem solving behaviour compared to no adjunct question and there were
no significant performance difference having and not having AO and there
were no significant interaction effects.
Review of Related Literature
94
A study conducted by Lucas (1972) showed that the use of three types
of advance organizers did not significantly affect the learning of a biological
concept in seventh grade science and that no interactive effects of IQ,
abstract reasoning, sex were found.
Ethirveera Singham (1971) compared the effect of organizer on that of
overview and summary in learning and retaining complex verbal material and
provided evidence and generalized the results to vocational students. He
found that that there was no significant difference in learning between
treatments. There were also no significant interaction between retention.
Hershman (1971) investigated the utility of advance organizer and
behavioural objectives for improving achievement in Physics at the college
level. The findings showed that there were no significant difference that could
be attributed to treatment effect with assurance, the behavioural objectives
were more able to help the lower ability students in most of the aspiration of
the students were the decisive variables that marked the treatment effects.
Munford (1971) tested the effectiveness of Advance Organizer in
facilitating learning and retention. The sample consisted of 51 college
students It was found that there is no significant difference among the groups
in the amount of initial learning or retention.
Sternbrink (1970) used interacting social science class of rural students
of 5th and 6th grade students. It was stated that the experimental group was
given a conceptual AO and a daily AO, The control group received only the
conceptual AO. Sternbrink came to the inference that the experimental group
shoed significant difference in the performance in favour of the AO
Broney (1969) examined the effect of varying types of introductory
information (advance organizer or historical introduction) on the acquisition
and retention of knowledge about differential geological phenomena found in
the field environment. The findings showed that subject receiving advance
organizing information did not show significantly greater acquisition on
historical introduction prior to a field experience.
Review of Related Literature
95
Weisberg (1969) examined the value of several modes of informal
organizers used to teach topography to eight grade students and determine
whether the Advance organizer in the form of visual aids might serve the
same function as Ausubel’s verbal advance organizer. The sample consisted
of 96 eighth grade students. The finding showed that there was a significant
difference between map as graphic organizer and verbal organizer.
Alexander and Williams (1979) studied five variation of social studies
lesson taught to grade 5-7 students. Organizer group retained more content
than the control group but no organizer group differed significantly from any of
the others. The study has shown that organizers designed to help students
structure their learning can facilitate achievement even at elementary level,
take visual or oral interactive form in addition to written form can be effective
when placed after the body of the lesson or post organizers.
Allen (1970) studied the effect of advance organizer on learning and
retention of IX grade students of 2 Junior high schools. The findings of the
study support the hypothesis that meaningful learning proceeds more easily
when new concepts are subsumed under broader and inclusive concepts.
Furthermore the nature of persons’ understanding of the concept changes as
it is associated with a wider array of concepts and specific prepositions.
Ausubel and Yousef (1963) in their study concluded that previously
learned relevant background knowledge significantly facilitated the learning of
concepts and retention of the first of two parallel related unfamiliar learning
passages when the influence of verbal ability was controlled.
Ausubel and Fitzgerald (1962) studied the effect of an advance
organizer antecedent learning and retention of two unfamiliar sequential
passages about endocrinology. The use of advance organizer enhanced the
learning of the material for those students with poor verbal ability knowledge
of the first passage exerted significant influence upon the new information
In the 1960’s several theories of learning and development emerged
that promised to provide a more direct link between learning theories and
Review of Related Literature
96
teaching of mathematics. The theories of Ausubel (1968), Bruner (1960, 66),
Gagne(1965), focused explicitly on the structure of content to be learned. The
theories of Ausubel, Bruner and Gagne could be applied more directly to
curriculum. Although Ausubel’s and Bruner’s position were probably more
congruent with the current theoretical orientation than Gagne’s initial neo-
behaviourism it was Gagne who provided the clearest specification of how the
mathematics curriculum would be analyzed and researched.
Studies of Advance organizer typically consists of comparing groups
one or which receives information which it is believed will aid clearness to
assimilate a subsequent communication which is given to both groups.
Although most early studies showed that the advance organizer had a
beneficial effect, mixed results begin to appear in the past decades
A further instance of positive effect of organizers came from Kahle and
Rastovac (1976) while no significant effect is reported by Clawson and Barnes
(1973), Graber Means and Johnsten (1972) Kahle and Nordland (1975) and
Koran and Koran (1973). After review Hartley and Davies (1976) and Gabel
Kogan and Sherwood (1980) concluded that Advance organizers are
generally advantageous through results are not clear cut. In contrast Barnes
and Clawson (1975) whose methods are criticized by Lawton and Wanska
(1977) concluded that Advance organizers generally are ineffective.
Resolution of the conflict in results may tie in the suggestion by West and
Fensham (1974) that Advance organizer can assist learning only if they
supply subsuming concepts which the students lack. West and Fensham
(1976) argue that most advance organizer studies do not provide evidence
about the validity of Ausubel theory since they do not eliminate alternative
explanation of positive or negative results. West and Fensham (1976)
attempted a more critical test by making two predictions that only those
learners who lack relevant prior knowledge will benefit from an advance
organizer and that the benefit can equally well be provided by remedial
teaching of the relevant prior knowledge Their results confirmed both
prediction providing strong support for at least part of Ausubel’s theory.
Review of Related Literature
97
From the reviewed research studies of AOM on various subjects, it is
evident that studies are inadequate to say anything definite about which
method is going to be most effective for presentation of a particular type of
content. A look at the research studies in the methodology of teaching and
teacher preparation also reveals the need for concerted efforts to try out
models of teaching in various areas and at all levels of schooling.
The teacher has to be convinced of their efficiency, in terms of time
and energy and of their efficiency in normal classroom teaching situations.
This should give researches on models a different orientation- not comparing
and establishing that they are better but that they are practical and useable.
This too substantiate that there is a need for research on the reasons for this
and then on how to use them in every day teaching.
3.3 STUDIES ON INTELLIGENCE Vs ACHIEVEMENT
To establish the fact that intelligence is related to achievement, the
investigator briefly presents below, a few reviewed studies in this regard.
Deary, Strand, Smith and Fernandez (2007) in the study on 5-year
prospective longitudinal study of 70,000+ English children examined the
association between psychometric intelligence at age 11 years and
educational achievement in national examinations in 25 academic subjects at
age 16. The correlation between a latent intelligence trait (Spearman's "g"
from CAT2E) and a latent trait of educational achievement (GCSE scores)
was 0.81. General intelligence contributed to success on all 25 subjects.
Essix, Sapp, and Kohler (2006) conducted a study designed to
examine the validity of the Test of Nonverbal Intelligence: Third Edition. TONI-
3 IQs, WISC-III FSIQs and KTEA N/U- Intercorrelations computed among
TONI-3 IQs, WISC-III IQs, and K-TEA Reading and Math Composite scores
indicated moderate relationships
Kovas, Harlaar and Petrill (2005) Mathematics performance at 7 years
as assessed by teachers using UK national curriculum criteria has been found
Review of Related Literature
98
to be highly heritable and found substantial genetic overlap between
mathematics and g (0.67)
Oh Hyeon-Joo, Glutting, Watkins, Youngstrom, and McDermott (2004)
in the study, the authors used structural equation modelling to investigate
relationships between ability constructs from the "Wechsler Intelligence Scale
for Children-Third Edition" (WISC-III; Wechsler, 1991) in explaining reading
and mathematics achievement constructs on the "Wechsler Individual
Achievement Test" (WIAT; Wechsler, 1992). Participants comprised the
nationally stratified Linking sample (N = 1,116) of the WISC-III and WIAT.
Results for mathematics indicated that they are obliged to consider "g".
Brandsma and Doolaard, (1999) in a study evaluating Dutch
elementary students by IQ, socioeconomic status, math and language test
scores, and expected and actual school recommendations found that pupil
scores in high-effective schools are almost 12 points higher than those in low-
effective schools. Higher SES and IQ meant higher teacher
recommendations.
Veena (1998), in her study tries to explore the relationship of
mathematics learning with different temperamental variables and found that
IQ and reasoning are significantly related to the dimensions of ascendant,
responsible, critical and plentiful.
Lalitha Bai (1992) compared the cognitive factor structures of high,
average and low achievers in mathematics at the secondary school level and
found for the high mathematics achievers the 31 cognitive variable are
reduced to three cognitive factors, Abstract reasoning, Numerical Spatial
Facility and Non- Language Reasoning.
Kasant, (1991), attempts to identify the cause of the large failure in
mathematics at SSC examination of Marati medium high school students in
Palghar tahsil found that low intelligence is one of the factor for the cause of
large failures among boys and girls along with poor numerical ability, poor
comprehensions and poor study habits.
Review of Related Literature
99
Sarala (1990) surveyed the conceptual errors of secondary school
pupils in learning select areas in modern mathematics and found that the
number of conceptual errors is very high and it is influenced by intelligence
along with some other variable namely sex, study habit etc. The relationship
between errors in mathematics and intelligence was seen to be negative and
significant.
Shankara Narayanan (1990), addresses the problem of achievement in
mathematics under guided discovery learning and reception learning
conditions in relation to intelligence and anxiety for that. The student of high
intelligence performed better that the average intelligence students,
irrespective of the method of instruction employed on the criterion measures.
Deshmukh Veena (1988) in a study tries to explore the relationship of
mathematics learning with different temperamental variables and found IQ
and reasoning were significantly related to it.
Setia S. (1992) in a study addresses to the theoretical understanding of
the achievement of learner at the senior secondary level in Modern
Mathematics in relation to the socio -psychological educational factor and
found that there was a significant difference in the achievement of rapid
learners on different levels of intelligence.
Kasant B.S. (1991) in an in-depth study of the causes of the large
failures in Mathematics at SSC examination of Marati Medium High School
Students points out intelligence is a major factor for the cause of failure along
with other variables like poor numerical ability, poor comprehension and recall
ability, no interest in Mathematics and poor study habits.
Shankara Narayanan B.L (1990) in a study addresses the problem of
achievement in Mathematics under guided discovery learning and reception
learning condition in relation to intelligence and anxiety and found that
students of high intelligence performed better than the average intelligent
students irrespective of the method of instruction employed on the criterion
measures
Review of Related Literature
100
Researchers continue to search for the interventions that will increase
IQ and, ultimately, academic achievement. Intelligence and creativity are the
two main cognitive variables studied by a large number of researchers.
Corroborative evidence to prove that intelligence is a correlate of achievement
was obtained by Garg L., 1992; Kaur P.,1992; Sen Barat K., 1992; Chanda
N.K. and Chanda S., 1990; Devi U.A., 1990; Shah J.H. 1990; Thilagavathi T.,
1990; Kumar R. 1989; Bhusari C.V., 1988 and Kaile H.S., 1988. They found
that the conjoint effect of intelligence and creativity is different on achievement
in different subjects.
Studies in the past decade have confirmed that intelligence and
socioeconomic background are major contributors to mathematics
achievement (Singh, 1986; Nilima Kumari, 1984; Rajput, 1984; Gakhar, 1981;
Jabbal, 1981; Kabu, 1980; Nalinidevi, 1976). Nilima Kumari (1984) studied
the conservation of number and substance in relation to intelligence and SES,
revealing significant positive relationships. Gakhar (1981) identified variables
of educational environment as responsible for acquisition of mathematical
concepts. Apart from SES and intelligence, variables like teachers'
qualifications, class size, encouragement to teacher by the head, use of
audio-visual aids, and feedback. were found significantly related to acquisition
of Mathematical concepts.
These studies clearly establishes the fact that intelligence is positively
correlated with achievement. Hence the investigator decided to take
intelligence as the matching variable in her study.