Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
26
CHAPTER – 3
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
During World War I, sulphur mustard (mustard) gas was the only blistering
agent in major use. It was recognised by a distinctive odor and had a fairly long
duration of effect under normal conditions. Since then, many mustard compounds
other than sulphur mustard have been developed which are odorless and vary in
duration of effectiveness. Out of these, the nitrogen mustard and sesqui mustard
have attracted some attention. Most blistering agents are insidious in action; there
is little or no pain at the time of exposure except with Lewisite and phosgene
oxime, which cause immediate pain on contact. The symptoms are somewhat
delayed. Phosgene oxime produces a wheal (similar to a bee sting) rather than a
watery blister, which the other blistering agents produce. Blistering agents may be
divided into five categories as given below.
Blistering agent Chemical name NATO code 1. Nitrogen mustard 2. Sulphur mustard - Mustard gas 3. Arsenicals - Lewisite 4. Oximes - Phosgene oxime 5. Others - Sesquimustard
2,2-dichlorotriethylamine 2,2-dichloro-N-methyl-diethylamine (Mechlorethamine) 2,2,2-trichlorotriethylamine 2,2-dichloroethyl sulphide methyldichloroarsine phenyldichloroarsine ethyldichloroarsine [dichloro (2-chlorovinyl) arsine] dichloroformoxime 1,2-bis-(2-chloroethylthio)ethane Bis-[2-(2-chloroethylthio)ethyl]ether L (63%) +HD (37%)
HN-1 HN-2 HN-3 HD MD PD ED L CX Q T HL
27
3.1 History The exact date of the first synthesis of sulphur mustard seems to be
unknown: 1820, 1822 and 1854 have all been quoted by various writers. A
German scientist Despretz recorded the formation of a disagreeable smelling
compound produced by the action of ethylene on sulphur chloride. Niemann and
Guthrie separately synthesized and described the properties of sulphur mustard in
1860 (Niemann, 1860; Guthrie, 1860). Sulphur mustard was first used in the First
World War by Germany against French troops at Ypres, Belgium (1917). Since
then, there has been evidence or allegations of sulphur mustard use in 11
conflicts, including by Italy against Ethiopia in 1936, by Japan against China in
1937, by Poland against Germany in 1939, by Egypt against Yemen from 1963 to
1967, and by Iraq against Iran in the 1980s. In addition, its use was threatened in
the early 1990s during the Persian Gulf War (Papirmeister et al, 1991). The last
military use was in the Iran–Iraq war. Over 100,000 Iranians were injured by
sulphur mustard and one-third is suffering from late effects until today. Historically,
mustard agents are the most widely used type of chemical warfare agent
(Marshall, 1984, Smith et al, 1995).
The nitrogen mustards were the result of an effort to create new chemical
agents before the advent of nerve agents. The nitrogen mustards are ammonia
derivatives. Nitrogen mustards were first synthesised in the 1930s. These
compounds were modifications of sulphur mustard and were found to have greater
systemic toxicity than sulphur mustard (Gilman and Philips, 1946; OSRD, 1946).
There were several reasons for the development of this series of agents. First,
they are more immediately toxic than sulphur mustard, especially to the eyes.
Secondly, they tended to break down the cellulose-based filter elements. Thirdly,
they are effective systemic poisons (Compton, 1987). Nitrogen mustards are
included in Schedule 1 A of the chemical weapon convention, with the three
chemicals HN-1, HN-2 and HN-3, specifically listed. Each of the nitrogen mustards
were investigated as a chemical weapon during World War II. HN-1 and HN-3
28
have both been manufactured on a large scale for weapons purposes, and
weaponisation of HN-3 has been carried out.
During WW II, Louis C. Goodman headed a group that was responsible for
the study of the pharmacological effects of nitrogen mustards. The group,
including Alfred Gilman, Frederick Philips, and Roberta Allen, studied the cytotoxic
properties of nitrogen mustard. Louis C. Goodman and Alfred Gilman are the chief
editors of Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics book. The group expanded their
work to examine the effect of nitrogen mustard on experimental tumor cells in
mice. It was found, but not published until later, that systemic administration of
nitrogen mustard caused dramatic regression of these mouse tumors. These data
formed the experimental basis of the first clinical trials of nitrogen mustard as a
cancer chemotherapy agent (Gilman, 1946, 1963; Gilman and Philips, 1946;
Rhoads, 1947). The clinical trials with nitrogen mustards were carried out in
several other locations. By 1948, close to 150 patients in the terminal stages of
Hodgkin's disease, lymphosarcoma, or certain leukemias had been treated with
this agent (Gilman and Cattell, 1948). The best results were obtained in cases of
Hodgkin's disease. Derivatives of nitrogen mustard (like cyclophosphamide,
melphelan and ifosphamide) are still used today, particularly for treatment of
various types of cancers due to their strong cytotoxic effects (Goodman and
Gilman, 2006).
None of the nitrogen mustards has been used on the battlefield and none is
included in U.S. stockpiles. However, stockpiled by several countries by the time
of World War II. HN-1 was the first successful ammonia derivative of nitrogen
mustard series synthesised. Its war potentials first came under consideration when
laboratory reports showed, blistering potency similar to sulphur mustard and
lewisite with other characteristics such as respiratory damage, degenerative
changes in the digestive tract, and inhibition of cell mitosis. This compound was
first developed to remove warts. Subsequent studies showed that minute
concentration (typically 0.4 mg in 1 kg distilled water) in direct injection would kill
29
certain malignant growths and tumors. Systemic toxicity occurred among
pharmacologist and laboratory workers.
HN-2 appears to have been formulated about the same time as HN-1.
While HN-1 is a pharmaceutical agent that became a military agent, HN-2 was a
prospective military agent that became a pharmaceutical substance known as
mustine or mechlorethamine. It was found useful for chemotherapy of certain
neoplasm; for many years, it was a mainstay in cancer chemotherapy until it was
replaced by other compounds (Jacobson et al, 1946; Gilman, 1963; Goodman et
al, 1946; Rhoads, 1946). HN-2 molecule is asymmetrical, is unstable upon storage
through polymerisation, forming numerous condensation products. Otherwise this
is a very dangerous compound with high vapour pressure, having an appreciable
vapour density, and being highly volatility. HN-2`s reactivity makes it a good
antineoplastic substance for destroying tumors if injected directly. Since the
human body does not detoxify HN-2, such therapy is a very complicated process.
Although not considered seriously as a military agent by the major powers.
HN-3 was the last of the three nitrogen based blister agents standardised
under an HN code. Whereas HN-1 was designed as a pharmaceutical and
become a military agent, and HN-2 was designed as a military agent and become
a pharmaceutical, HN-3 was designed as a military agent and remained as such.
HN-3 is the principal representative of the nitrogen mustards because its vesicant
properties are almost equal to those of sulphur mustard. It is also most stable
upon storage of the three-nitrogen mustards. The nitrogen mustards do not store
well, due to a tendency to polymerise into quaternary ammonium salt, which are
not reabsorbed into solution. Although HN-3 is the most stable of the series, it too
will decompose in munitions. For this reason HN-3 never superceded distilled
sulphur mustard in NATO inventories. Toxicologically, HN-3 and sulphur mustard
are similar, and also HN-3 has a pronounced lacrimatory effect and rapidly
produces skin rashes. Any nation with pesticide production capacity can produce
the nitrogen mustards.
30
3.2 Structure The CAS Registory number of the mustard agents is given below;
Mustard agents CAS Registory no. HN-1 538-07-8
HN-2 51-75-2
HN-3 555-77-1
Sulphur mustard 505-60-2
The structures of nitrogen mustards and sulphur mustard are shown in
Figure.3.1
HN-1 has a simple structure, in which the hydrogen bonds of ammonia
(NH3) have been replaced with an ethyl group and two chloroethyl groups.
HN-2 is formed around ammonia in which two of the hydrogen bonds are
replaced by chloroethyl (ClC2H4) groups and the third replaced by a methyl (CH3)
group.
In HN-3, the hydrogen bonds of ammonia have been replaced with three
chloroethyl (ClC2H4) groups. HN-3 is the least volatile of the HN series.
The HN series is developed from nitrogeneous compounds. The immediate
parent compounds are triethylamine, (C2H5)3N, and triethanolamine, N(C2H4OH)3.
Sulphur mustard has a simple structure, consisting of two ethyl groups
bound together around an atom of sulphur. Chlorine bonds have replaced the
outer two hydrogen bonds along the central axis.
31
3.3 Physicochemical properties of mustard agents Besides, toxicity mechanisms, the physical properties of the agent itself and
its formulation also present similarly important threat considerations. Selection of
agents and agent formulations can be used to affect differential impacts with
respect to droplet size and liquid deposition, agent persistence, and agent
volatility. The classic chemical warfare agents have a tremendous range of
volatility and volatility can be a determinant in deciding which agents will be used
(US Departments, 1990). Agents such as hydrogen cyanide (1,000,000 mg/m3)
and sarin (22,000 mg/m3) are relatively volatile; they present an immediate, but
short-lived, threat. These agents are referred to as nonpersistent (i.e. they
vaporize rapidly after delivery). Alternatively, agents such as VX (10 mg/m3) and
sulphur mustard (965 mg/m3) tend to fall largely in droplets, with less vaporization,
and remain on exposed surfaces for a long time. These agents are called
persistent. Formulation is also used to manipulate the fate of the agent. Soman,
VX, Lewisite, and sulphur mustard can be mixed with high-molecular-weight
thickeners to increase droplet size and thereby decrease primary vaporization.
Such additives are generally used to promote efficient agent deposition on the
target site. Thickeners can also increase agent persistence and may hamper
decontamination efforts (Sidell et al, 2002). The use of persistent agents such as
mustard and VX may pose a threat for many days. Though such types of data on
vapour pressure and persistency are reported for nerve agents and sulphur
mustard, but for nitrogen mustards, they were not properly analysed. Yet
stockpiled by several countries during World War II, they were not used. The
physicochemical properties of mustard agents are given in Table 3.1 (ATSDR,
1992).
Appearance: - While comparing with pure sulphur mustard, which is a
colorless liquid. HN-1 and HN-3 are colorless to pale yellow oily liquid and
HN-2 is pale amber to yellow oily liquid.
32
Odour: - Distilled technical grade sulphur mustard is nearly odorless to
garlic or mustard odour, while all nitrogen mustards possess a charecterstic
odour. HN-1 has a faint, fishy, or musty odour. HN-2 has fruity odour in high
concentrations and a fishy smell in low concentrations. HN-3 is odorless
when pure but has been reported to have a butter almond odour.
Solubility: - The nitrogen mustards are not very soluble in water. The
reported values are approximately 0.16 g/L for HN-1 and HN-3 and 12 g/L
for HN-2 (Franke, 1982). They are freely soluble in acetone and other
organic solvents like ether, benzene etc. The solubility of HN-3 in water is
less than that of sulphur mustard. HN-3 is soluble in organic solvents viz.
ether, benzene, and acetone. Sulphur mustard is insoluble in water but has
good solubility in organic solvents. Mustard agents will not travel through
groundwater in solution because of its low solubility (Rosenblatt et al,
1975).
Freezing point - It is important to know the freezing point of a chemical
agent, because dissemination characteristics vary markedly with physical
state. For example, sulphur mustard can freeze in a spray tank at low
temperatures and cannot be dispensed. Below their freezing points, most
agents become unreliable in creating casualties by direct effect. The effects
result from secondary transfer. Warming the frozen agent upon entering an
enclosure or area where the temperature is high enough will melt or
vaporise the agent.
Freezing point of sulphur mustard is 14oC; whereas all nitrogen
mustards freeze below 0oC. HN-1 freeze at −34°C, HN-2 freeze at −65°C to
−60°C and HN-3 freeze at −37°C.
Boiling point: - The boiling point represents the highest usable
temperature of a liquid agent. It can be used to estimate the persistency of
a chemical (under a given set of conditions). The reason is that the vapour
33
pressure and the evaporating tendency of a chemical agent vary inversely
with its boiling point. The higher the boiling point, the more slowly a liquid
evaporates at ordinary temperatures. Thus, agents with low boiling points
are normally nonpersistent. Those with high boiling points are persistent.
The boiling point of sulphur mustard is 217oC and evaporates slowly. HN-1
(194°C) and HN-3 (256°C) are near to the boiling point of sulphur mustard.
HN-2 is having a very low boiling point of 75°C and it is least persistant
agent in whole mustard agent’s family. The boiling point also gives an
indication of the practicality for decontamination with hot air.
Vapour density: - Vapour density is the ratio of the density of any gas or
vapour to the density of air, under the same conditions of temperature and
pressure. It is a measure of how heavy the vapour is in relation to the same
volume of air. Vapour density helps in estimating how long an agent will
persist in valleys and depressions. The higher the vapour density, the
longer the vapour will linger in low-lying areas.
Agents with low vapour densities rise. Agent AC (hydrogen cyanide)
is the only militarily significant agent that is lighter than air. Chemical agent
clouds with high vapour densities seek lower ground in much the same way
as water poured on the ground. Agents with high vapour densities tend to
evolve into long coherent streamers. For example, agent sulphur mustard
(5.4) is almost five times as heavy as air. Vapour density of HN-2 is equal to
sulphur mustard whereas HN-1 (5.9) and HN-3 (7.1) having higher vapour
density than sulphur mustard.
Liquid density: - The density of a liquid chemical agent is the weight in
grams of one cubic centimeter of the liquid at a specified temperature.
Liquid density is a measure of an agent’s weight in comparison to water
(density 1.0). This comparison gives the specific gravity. Liquids form
layers, and the one with the greatest density sinks to the bottom. The layer
with the lowest density rises to the top. If an agent is much denser than
34
water, it will tend to sink to the bottom and separate out. An example is
mustardlewisite (liquid density 1.66). If an agent has about the same
density as water, such as the nerve agents, it will tend to mix throughout the
depth of the water. The nerve agents are slightly denser than water.
Therefore, the concentration of nerve agent will tend to increase with depth.
Agents that are less dense than water, such as hydrogen cyanide (liquid
density 0.69), tend to float on water.
Sometimes density is not the only factor that determines how an
agent will distribute in water. For example, if sulphur mustard falls on water,
little globs of it will scatter throughout the depth of the water. The larger
ones tend to coagulate and sink, forming a layer at the bottom. The finer
droplets or mist created by the explosion form a layer on top, one molecule
thick, likes an oil slick. Surface tension holds the layer on the surface. If the
slick is very thin, it will be iridescent, reflecting rainbow like colors. If it is a
little thicker, it may not be noticeable.
Liquid density is of interest in computing the chemical efficiency of a
munition, because we always express toxicities in units of weight. For
example, a munition filled with phosgene (liquid density about 1.4 at 20oC)
will contain twice as much chemical agent by weight as a munition of the
same volume filled with hydrogen cyanide (liquid density about 0.7 at 10oC).
It will also have a much higher chemical efficiency.
When compared to sulphur mustard, the density of all three-nitrogen
mustards is less. HN-3 has approximately less equal density to sulphur
mustard.
HN-1 1.09 g/cm3
HN-2 1.12 g/cm3
HN-3 1.24 g/cm3
Sulphur mustard 1.27 g/cm3
35
Vapour pressure: - Vapour pressure is the pressure exerted by a vapour
when a state of equilibrium exists between the vapour and its liquid (or
solid) state. It is the pressure in a closed space above a substance when no
other gas is present. Vapour pressure varies with temperature, so the
temperature must be stated to determine vapour pressure. At any
temperature, any liquid (or solid) will have some vapour pressure, however
small.
Substances with high vapour pressure evaporate rapidly. Those with
low vapour pressure evaporate slowly. The impact of vapour pressure on
the rate of evaporation makes vapour pressure a very important property in
considering the tactical use and duration of effectiveness of chemical
agents. A potential chemical agent is valuable for employment when it has
a reasonable vapour pressure. One with exceptionally high vapour pressure
is of limited use. It vaporizes and dissipates too quickly. Examples are
arsine and carbon monoxide. On the other hand, mechanical or thermal
means may effectively aerosolize and disseminate solid and liquid agents of
very low vapour pressure. Vapour pressure and volatility are related.
Translated into volatility, vapour pressure is most understandable and
useful.
When compared to sulphur mustard (0.11 mmHg), the vapour
pressure of HN-1 (0.25 mmHg) and HN-2 (0.43 mmHg) are more. HN-3
(0.11 mmHg) has equal vapour pressure to sulphur mustard (Munro et al,
1999)
Volatility: - Volatility is the weight of vapour present in a unit volume of air,
under equilibrium conditions, at a specified temperature. It is a measure of
how much material (agent) evaporates under given conditions. The volatility
depends on vapour pressure. It varies directly with temperature. The
volatility of mustard agents are given below (Munro et al, 1999; Davis,
1947).
36
HN-1 2.29 mg/m3 at 25°C
HN-2 3.60 mg/m3 at 25°C
HN-3 0.12 mg/m3 at 25°C
Sulphur mustard 920 mg/m3 at 25°C
All nitrogen mustards, especially HN-3, are less volatile and more
persistant than sulphur mustard. HN-3 is considered environmentally
persistent, whereas HN-1 and HN-2 are considered moderately persistent.
Because of the low volatility of nitrogen mustards, dangerous concentration
will not be found in the atmosphere. The volatility of sulphur mustard is
more than nitrogen mustards and is capable to form high dangerous
concentration in atmosphere.
Hydrolysis: - The mechanism of hydrolysis is similar for all mustard
agents, with formation of a cyclic intermediate. The hydrolysis in water of
nitrogen mustards is slower than sulphur mustard (Epstein et al, 1973).
HN-1 hydrolyses slowly because of low solubility in water; less
readily hydrolysed than sulphur mustard. HN-2 forms complex condensates
or polymers. HN-2 hydrolyses slowly, except in the presence of alkalis;
products formed are complex polymeric quaternary ammonium salts;
dimerises fairly rapidly in water. HN-3 forms hydrochloric acid and
triethanolamine in dilute solutions; dimer formation in higher concentrations.
HN-3 hydrolyses slowly, except in presence of alkalis; products formed are
complex polymeric quaternary ammonium salts; dimerises rapidly in water.
Sulphur mustard hydrolyses rapidly as compared to nitrogen mustard.
Decomposition Temperature: - The decomposition temperature is that
at which a chemical breaks down into two or more substances. This
temperature can be used to evaluate candidate chemical agents. A low
decomposition temperature (one that is markedly lower than the boiling
point) will usually mean that dissemination of the chemical agent will cause
37
excessive decomposition. All nitrogen mustards and sulphur mustard
decompose before the boiling point is reached.
Stability: - Sulphur mustard is stable in steel or aluminum containers.
When stored in metal container, it shows little corrosive properties. HN-1
polymerizes slowly. So munitions would be effective for several years.
When it stores in metal container and other materials, it is corrosive to
ferrous alloys. HN-1 is obsolete, this being one of the prime reason. HN-2 is
not stable due to its tendency to polymerize under all conditions; HN-3 slow
and steadily undergoes polymerisation. Munitions effective for several
years, with gradual formation of dark amber polymeric quaternary
ammonium salts, which are not resoluble in their parent compound. HN-3 is
stable enough for use as a bomb even under tropical conditions. However,
the agent darkens and deposits a crystalline solid in storage. Hence,
sulphur mustard was preferred over all the nitrogen mustards.
38
Table 3.1 Physical properties of mustard agents.
Property
HN-1
HN-2
HN-3
Sulphur mustard
Description
Colorless to pale yellow oily liquid
Pale amber to yellow oily liquid
Colorless to pale yellow oily liquid
Colorless liquid
Odour
Faint fishy or musty odor
Faint soapy odor at low concentration; fruity odor at high concentrations
Faint butter almond odor
Slight garlic or mustard like odor.
Molecular weight
170.08
156.07
204.54
159.08
Boiling point (760 mm Hg)
194ºC
75ºC 256ºC (decomposes)
217ºC
Freezing point
-34ºC
-65 to -60ºC
-3.7ºC
+14ºC
Vapour pressure (at 25°C)
0.25 mm Hg
0.427 mm Hg
0.0109 mm Hg
0.11 mm Hg
Liquid density (at 25ºC)
1.09 g/mL
1.15 g/mL
1.24 g/mL 1.27 g/mL
Solubility in water
Sparingly soluble
Sparingly soluble
Practically insoluble
Slightly soluble
Samples of nitrogen mustards and sulphur mustard
39
3.4 Toxicological effects of mustard agents
3.4.1 General effects
The nitrogen and sulphur mustard act first as cell irritants and finally as a
cell poison on all tissues. The first symptom usually appears in 4 to 6 hr after
contact (Noyes, 1946). The higher the concentration, the shorter the interval
between the exposure agent and the first symptom. Local action of the mustards
results in conjunctivitis (inflammation of the eyes); erythema (redness of the skin),
which may be followed by blistering or ulceration; and an inflammatory reaction of
nose, throat, trachea, bronchi, and lungs. Injuries produced by mustard heal slowly
and are much more liable for infection than burns of similar intensity produced by
physical means or by other chemicals.
Mustard’s most important metabolic effect, for its acute toxicity, is inhibition
of cellular glycolysis. Disruption of the metabolic pathway is found after exposure
to nearly all vesicant chemicals, usually due to interference with sulfhydryl-rich
hexokinase enzyme systems (Dixon and Needham, 1946). In the case of sulphur
mustard, inhibition of glycolosis is an indirect result to nucleic acid damage and
repair. Initially, sulphur mustard rapidly alkylates the purine bases (guanine and
adenine) of DNA. Activation of endonucleases then leads to removal
(depurination) of alkylated bases, leaving apurinic sites where DNA breaks occur
readily. The need for DNA repair mechanism activates poly (ADP-ribose)
polymerase, an enzyme that rapidly depletes cellular NADP (Papirmeister et al,
1985; Rankin et al, 1980). Depletion of cellular NADP, which begins within 1 h of
exposure and is maximal after 4 h, inhibits glycolysis, leads to release of tissue
proteases, and ultimately results in cell necrosis. These biochemical changes
parallel the development of tissue injury (Dixon and Needham, 1946; Holmstedt,
1963).
Exposure to sulphur mustard causes irritation, edema, vesication, ulceration
and ultimately cell death (Atkins et al, 2000). Direct contact with sulphur mustard
or exposure to its vapour may lead to severe and slow healing lesions (Mol et al,
1991).
40
3.4.2 Effects on eyes
Nitrogen mustards act more quickly on the eyes than does sulphur mustard.
The eyes are very susceptible to low concentrations of nitrogen mustard, while a
high concentration is required to significantly damage the skin or respiratory tract.
The vapours of HN-1 are irritating to the eyes and nasal membranes even in low
concentration. HN-2 affects the eyes in lower doses than do the other mustards. It
produces toxic effects more rapidly than sulphur mustard. HN-2 is highly irritating
to the eyes and throat; in high concentrations it can cause blindness. Majority of
the symptoms of HN-3 are delayed (4 to 6 h) similar to sulphur mustard (Figure
3.2). In some cases eye irritation, tearing, and sensitivity to light (photophobia)
develop immediately. The median incapacitating dose of HN-3 for eyes is 200 mg-
min/m3.
3.4.3 Effects on Skin
Mild vapour exposure may produce no skin lesions. Severe vapour
exposure or exposure to liquid nitrogen mustard will result in redness of the skin,
causing irritation and itching. Later blisters may appear. The skin lesions are
similar to those caused by sulphur mustard. Blistering of the skin may occur after
liquid exposure, severe or persistent exposure, or vapour condensation in sweat.
Usually a rash will develop from liquid contamination within an hour, replaced by
blistering between 6 and 12 h after exposure.
The body does not detoxify HN-2. Therefore, the effects are cumulative.
HN-2 has the greatest blistering power of the nitrogen mustards in vapour form but
is intermediate as a liquid blistering agent. Skin effects are delayed 12 hours or
longer after exposure.
Exposure to sulphur mustard results in the formation of blisters, the
resulting incapacitation can be temporary or permanent (Papirmeister et al,
1984a,b; Somani, 1992) (Figure 3.3). The blistering response may be due to the
release of proteases that may subsequently damage glycoprotein such as lamilin
that mediate dermo-epidermal attachment (Lindsey and Rice, 1995). Inhibition of
41
mitosis and cell death results from the formation of monofunctional and particularly
the bifunctional intra and interstrand cross-links by the interaction of DNA with
sulphur mustard (Fox and Schott, 1980).
3.4.4 Effects on Respiratory Tract
Effects on the respiratory tract are the same as those of sulphur mustard:
irritation of the nose and throat, hoarseness progressing to loss of voice, and a
persistent cough. These effects can progress to fever and labored breathing.
Bronchial pneumonia may appear after 24 hours.
3.4.5 Effects on GIT
Following ingestion or systemic absorption, the nitrogen mustards injure the
intestinal tract. Severe diarrhea, may be bloody, occur. Ingestion of 2 to 6
milligrams causes nausea and vomiting. Nausea and vomiting are common within
the first few hours after nitrogen mustard exposure, the early nausea and vomiting,
which are generally transient and not severe, may be caused by the cholinergic
activity of nitrogen mustard or because of the unpleasant odour (Anslow and
Houck, 1946). Nausea and vomiting that occur later are probably due to the
generalised cytotoxic activity of nitrogen mustard and damage to the mucosa of
the gastrointestinal tract. Diarrhea is not common, and gastrointestinal bleeding
seems to be even less common (Graef et al, 1948).
3.5 Mechanism of Action of Mustard Agents The toxic effects of mustard agent depend on its ability to covalently bind to
other substances. The chlorine atom is displaced from the ethyl group and the
mustard agent is transferred to a reactive sulphonium ion or imonium ion. This ion
can bind to a large number of different biological molecules (Figure 3.4).
Preferably, it binds to nucleophiles such as nitrogen in the base components of
nucleic acids and sulphur in SH-groups in proteins and peptides. Since some
mustard agents contains two or three “reactive groups", it can also form a bridge
between or within molecules. Mustard agent can destroy a large number of
42
different substances in the cell by means of alkylation and thereby influence
numerous processes in living tissue.
The exact mechanisms by which the mustard agents exert their effects are
complicated and not clearly understood. However, the delay in the response of
cells to exposure suggests that the toxicity is not a direct result of the interaction
between the mustard and the target molecule, but involves subsequent cellular
processes (Bernstein et al, 1985). The effects of nitrogen mustard, sulphur
mustard and their derivatives on a number of cellular components and processes
have been studied and various hypotheses have been proposed.
3.5.1 Cross linking of DNA hypothesis
There are several points of evidence which indicate the involvement of
nucleic acids in the mechanism of action of these compounds. For example,
nitrogen and sulphur mustard exert their earliest visible effects on the nucleus,
causing DNA damage.
It is now well established that nitrogen mustards, sulphur mustard and their
derivatives alkylate DNA (Brookes and Lawley, 1960; Hemminki and Kallama,
1986; Price et al, 1968; Ross, 1962; Sack et al, 1978) and RNA (Shooter et al,
1971, 1974a, 1974b).
There are many sites at which alkylation may occur, N-1, N-3 and N-7 in
adenine; N-3, N-7 and O-6 in guanine; N-1, N-3 and O-2 in cytosine and N-3 and
O-4 in thymine (Fig. no. 3.5) (Lawley and Brookes, 1963; Lawley and Shah, 1972;
Lawley and Martin, 1975; Sack et al, 1978; Shooter et al, 1974a). However, in
DNA (Fig. 3.3), nitrogen mustards and sulphur mustard alkylate preferentially at
the guanine N-7 and adenine N-3 (Benson et al, 1988; Brookes and Lawley, 1960;
Ludlum, 1984; 1987; Ludlum et al, 1986; Price et al, 1968; Raikova et al, 1982;
1983), with the guanine N-7 alkylation predominant. The monofunctional mustard
chloroethyl ethyl sulphide (CEES) has also been shown to alkylate guanine O-6
(Ludlum, 1987; Ludlum and Papirmeister, 1986; Ludlum et al, 1986). Crosslinking
of two guanine residues via the N-7 to produce N, N-bis [2-(7-guaninyl)-
43
ethyl]amine or analogous products (Figure 3.6) is also observed (Hemminki and
Kallama (1986). The relative frequencies of these products in DNA exposed to
nitrogen or sulphur mustard have yet to be established (Fox and Scott, 1980;
Whitfield, 1987). Ludlum et al, 1986 found approximately 63% guanine N-7, 11%
adenine N-3 and less than 0.1% guanine 0-6 alkylation after alkylation of DNA by
CEES. However, approximately 16% of the adducts remain unidentified (Ludlum,
1987; Ludlum et al, 1986).
Some alkylating agents are able to esterify the DNA phosphate groups
(Roberts, 1978). However, although it has been proposed that sulphur mustard
should be able to alkylate these groups (Roberts, 1978), no evidence of this
reaction has been found (Hemminki and Kallama, 1986; Ludlum and Papirmeister,
1986).
The bifunctional nature of nitrogen mustards and sulphur mustard results in
the formation of both interstrand and intrastrand crosslinks via the formation of a
diguaninyl derivatives (Flamm et al, 1970; Roberts, 1978). Crosslinks are also
formed between DNA and protein (Dean et al, 1986a, b; Hansson et al, 1987;
Murray and meyn, 1986; Roberts et al, 1968).
The cytotoxic action of nitrogen mustards and sulphur mustard is not
associated with the inhibition of cell growth as measured by RNA and protein
synthesis (Lawley and Brookes, 1965; Roberts et al, 1968). However, the toxic
effects of these compounds are associated with decreased DNA synthesis. The
decreased DNA synthesis is in turn ascribed to the formation of DNA interstrand
crosslinks that prevent the DNA acting as an effective template for DNA replication
(Lawley and Brookes, 1963). Several studies have demonstrated a correlation
between the number of mustard-induced interstrand crosslinks and cytotoxicity
(Garcia et al, 1988; Hansson et al, 1987; Millar et al, 1986; Ramonas et al, 1981).
This hypothesis is supported by the observation that Chinese hamster cells
hypersensitive to bifunctional alkylating agents exhibit decreased ability to remove
DNA crosslinks (Hoy et al, 1985). In addition, the higher toxicity of melphalan than
nitrogen mustard in human melanoma cells under conditions of equal crosslink
44
formation is related to a lower rate of removal of the crosslinks (Hansson et al,
1987). The decreased sensitivity of cells treated in G2 is then ascribed to the
greater chance of the lesions being repaired before the next S-phase, compared to
cells treated at the transition between G1 and S (Murray and Meyn, 1986).
3.5.2 Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Hypothesis
The enzyme poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (polyADPR-P) is indispensible
for DNA excision repair (Creissen and Shall, 1982; Durkacz et al, 1980; Hayaishi
and Ueda, 1982; Ueda and Haysishi, 1985). DNA damage stimulates poly(ADP)
ribosylatlon and a concomitant decrease in NAD+ (Durkacz et al, 1980; Ueda and
Hayslshi, 1985). Inhibition of Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase inhibits the ligation
step (DNA ligase II) in DNA repair (Creissen and Shall, 1982). The NAD+
depletion and cell death induced by the DNA alkylating agent dimethylsulphate are
prevented by Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase inhibitors (Stubberfield and Cohen,
1988).
Dean and Fox (1984) and Papirmeister et al (1985) have proposed a
generalised disturbance of cell metabolism involving nucleotide pool imbalance
because of intoxication by mustards. According to Papirmeister et al (1985) the
sequence of events following exposure to mustard is as follows:
i. DNA alkylation;
ii. Spontaneous and enzymatic depurination resulting in apurinic sites and DNA breaks;
iii. Activation of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase by the accumulation of DNA breaks;
iv. Lowering of cellular NAD+;
v. Inhibition of glycolysis and accumulation of G-6-P;
vi. Stimulation of NADP+-dependent pentose phosphate cycle;
vii. Protease release and
viii. Pathological changes.
45
A number of the steps in the sequence have been demonstrated to occur.
Depurination of alkylated bases is known to occur (Verly, 1980). Treatment of
human skin grafts and leukocytes resulted in a dose-dependent decrease of up to
40% in the NAD levels (Meier et al, 1984; 1987; Papirmeister et al, 1985). More
importantly, in the leukocyte work, the decrease in NAD+ only occurred in those
cells (lymphocytes) containing poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (Meier et al, 1987).
Finally, inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibited the decrease in NAD+
(Gross et al, 1985; Papirmeister et al, 1985). However, there are some aspects of
the hypothesis which remain to be established. Although some monofunctional
alkylating agents are known to stimulate the synthesis of poly (ADP-ribose)
(Juarez-Salinas et al, 1979), Graham and Fox (1983) did not observe such an
increase in nitrogen mustard treated cells. Secondly, although the NAD+ decrease
could be blocked by inhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase or niacin, there
was no report of a concomitant reduction in the cellular damage (Gross et al,
1985; Meier et al, 1984; 1987; Papirmeister et al, 1985). The use of inhibitors of
poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase is also not ideal since these compounds also inhibit
the DNA repair required for the cells to recover (Meier et al, 1984). Also, as
pointed out by Whitfield (1987) other inhibitors of NAD+ synthesis such as
3-acetylpyridine and 6-aminopyridine should also be vesicants.
3.5.3 Oxidative Stress and Glutathione Reduction Hypothesis
DNA is an important but not the only target in the cellular aspect of nitrogen
mustards and sulphur mustard intoxication (Vijayaraghavan et al, 2005). Berger et
al (1979) proposed a general hypothesis for the mechanism of cell death.
Oxidative Stress (OS) is a general term used to describe the steady state level of
oxidative damage in a cell, tissue, or organ, caused by the reactive oxygen
species (ROS). This damage can affect a specific molecule or the entire organism.
Reactive oxygen species, such as free radicals and peroxides, represent a class
of molecules that are derived from the metabolism of oxygen and exist inherently
in all aerobic organisms. There are many different sources by which the reactive
oxygen species are generated. The oxygen species includes O2-. (Superoxide),
46
.HO (Hydroxyl), HO2 (Hydroperoxyl), ROO. (Peroxyl) and RO (alkoxyl) as free
radicals, and H2O2 (Hydrogen peroxide), HOCl (Hypochlorous acid), O3 (ozone)
and 1O2 (singlet oxygen) as nonradicals. The oxidants or free radicals are species
with very short half-life, high reactivity and damaging activity towards
macromolecules like proteins, DNA and Lipids.
The second major hypothesis to explain the effects of mustard agents is
that it reacts with the intracellular free radical scavenger glutathione(GSH), thereby
depleting it, resulting in a rapid inactivation of sulfhydryl groups and the
consequent loss of protection against oxygen-derived free radicals, specifically
those causing lipid peroxidation (Gentilhomme et al, 1992). In 1987, Orrenius and
Nicotera (1987) established that menadione-induced depletion of GSH resulted in
loss of protein thiols and inactivation of sulfhydryl-containing enzymes. Included in
this class of thiol proteins are the calcium and magnesium adenosine
triphosphatases, which regulate calcium homeostasis. With the inactivation of the
enzymes that control thiol proteins, intracellular calcium levels would increase.
High calcium levels within the cell trigger activation of protease, phospholipases,
and endonucleases, which could give rise to the breakdown of membranes,
cytoskeleton, and DNA that, would result in cell death. A report (Ministry of
Defence, U K) suggested that this mechanism could be activated by mustards and
might be the mechanism of mustard injury. While several aspects of the thiol
calcium hypothesis (e.g. release of arachidonic acid and decrease in membrane
fluidity) have been observed in cell cultures following sulphur mustard exposure,
(Ray et al, 1995) no definitive studies have drawn an association between calcium
disruptions and mustard-induced pathology. Another proposed consequence of
the mechanism—based on the depletion of GSH following mustard exposure—is
lipid peroxidation (Miccadei et al, 1988; Paulet, 1952). According to this
hypothesis, depletion of GSH allows the formation of oxygen-derived free radicals.
The oxidizing compounds thus formed will react with membrane phospholipids to
form lipid peroxides that could, in turn, lead to membrane alterations, changes in
membrane fluidity, and eventual breakdown of cellular membranes. As previously
mentioned, studies (Ray et al, 1991) have shown changes in membrane fluidity
47
following sulphur mustard exposure. In addition, in 1989, Elsayed and colleagues
(Elsayed et al, 1989) demonstrated the presence of lipid peroxidation indicators in
the tissue of mice exposed to subcutaneous butyl mustard. However, as with the
thiol–calcium hypothesis, no studies have directly linked lipid peroxidation with the
mustard-induced injury.
Nitrogen mustards like sulphur mustard, alkylate DNA, which leads to
apoptosis and necrosis (Bienvenu et al, 1992). Most of the cellular damage
produced by HN-2 results from the production of free radicals, which directly react
with biological membranes, causing lipid peroxidation and cell damage (O`connor
et al, 1991 and Khan et al, 1992). Second messengers or mediators are generated
from membrane lipid peroxidation or DNA strand breaks, and are potent activators
of the apoptotic signal (Buttke and Sandstrom, 1995). Among the various
processes that may protect cells from oxygen radical–induced apoptosis, the
enzyme glutathione peroxidase appears to be particularly important. This enzyme
catalyzes the reduction of peroxides by glutathione.
Glutathione occurs in high concentration in cells and acts as a redox agent
(Scott and Eagleson, 1988). The Orrenius theory of toxicity suggests that depletion
of glutathione (GSH) is one mechanism by which compounds kill cells (see
Whitfield, 1987). The main function of GSH is indeed to protect tissue and DNA
against the damaging effect of hydroperoxides, and the amount of cellular
glutathione has been found to play a role in the defence against DNA damage
induced by HN-2 (Meister and Anderson, 1983). The involvement of GSH in the
toxicity of nitrogen and sulphur mustard is still unclear. Several groups have
reported increased levels of sulphydryl groups in cells resistant to phenylalanine
mustard (Begleiter et al, 1983; Suzukake et al, 1982). In addition, the formation of
a diglutathione conjugate between phenylalanine mustard and GSH has been
demonstrated (Dulik et al, 1986). Reduction of GSH levels by buthione
sulphoximine or dietary manipulation sensitizes cells, which are resistant to
phenylalanine mustard (Somfal-Relle et al, 1984; Suzukake et al, 1982) while
48
elevation of GSH by diethylmaleate increases resistance (Taylor and Brown,
1988).
Robson et al (1987) found decreased DNA interstrand cross-link formation
accompanied by elevated GSH and elevated glutathione S-transferase activity in
Chinese hamster ovary cells resistant to nitrogen mustard. Conversely, Hansson
et al (1988) observed increased nitrogen mustard toxicity accompanied by
increased DNA interstrand cross-linking in human melanoma cells treated with
nitrogen mustard and D, L-buthionine-S,R-sulfoximine. However, although Raji-
NH2 cells (resistant to nitrogen mustard) have twice the GSH present in sensitive
cells, the reduction of GSH by buthione sulphoximine did not affect the cytotoxicity
(Tan et al, 1987). In addition, Walker 258 cells resistant to nitrogen mustard
exhibited reduced glutathione reductase activity (Dean et al, 1986a,b).
3.5.4 Membrane Effects Hypothesis
Nitrogen mustard is known to have a number of effects on cellular functions
associated with the cell membrane. Treatment of tumor cells or erythrocytes
results in decreased rotational diffusion of membrane components, which is
ascribed to the formation of protein cross-links (Doppler et al, 1985; Grunicke et al,
1985; Levy 1965).
The use of 86Rb+ as a K+ congener has shown that nitrogen mustard
decreases the frusemide sensitive K+ transport, which is mediated by a Na+/K+/CI
cotransporter (Baxter et al, 1982; Doppler et al, 1985; Grunicke et al, 1985;
Wilcock and Hickman, 1988; Wilcock et al, 1988). It is important to note that the
monofunctional mustard (2 chloroethyl)dimethylamine has no such effect (Baxter
et al, 1982; Wilcock et al, 1988). The ouabain sensitive Na+ pump is only affected
at relatively high concentrations of nitrogen mustard (Baxter et al, 1982; Doppler et
al, 1985).
The significance of these observations is unclear. The fact that frusemide
does not affect the cell proliferation indicates that the inhibition of K+ transport by
nitrogen mustard is not sufficient to explain its effects (Doppler et al, 1985;
49
Wilcock et al, 1988). It also remains to be established whether the effect of
nitrogen mustard is direct or indirect (Wilcock et al, 1988).
The trifunctional mustard tris (2-chloroethy!)Amine (HN-3) has been found
to alkylate spectrin and cross-link it to itself and other membrane proteins in
human erythrocytes (Wildenauer and Wegar, 1979). The result of the alkylation is
fixation of the cell shape and protection against metabolically induced chances of
shape (Wildenauer et al, 1980). Spectrin forms the basis of the erythrocyte
membrane skeleton (Bennett, 1985). No reaction between HN-3 and
phospholipids was detected in this experimental system (Wildenauer et al, 1980).
3.5.5 Cytoplasmic Effects Hypothesis
In addition to the effects on nucleic acids and the cell membrane, the
effects on cytoplasmic components have also been studied.
Wildenauer and Weger (1979) and Fung and coworkers (1975) have
observed the alkylation of haemoglobin by nitrogen mustard. In human
erythrocytes the formation of dimers was observed (Wildenauer and Weger,
1979). In isolated sickle cell haemoglobin alkylation at the β2 histidine by nitrogen
mustard was detected (Fung et al, 1975). However, sulphur mustard was not
observed to alkylate haemoglobin (Fung et al, 1975). Sulphur mustard and CEES
have been observed to increase the release of lysosomal enzymes in vitro but only
at extremely high concentrations (Gross et al, 1981). In vivo, treatment of rats with
nitrogen mustard also indicated that these enzymes are unlikely to be involved
early in the response of the cell (Cohen, 1978).
3.6 Medical Management of Mustard Agents
3.6.1 Decontamination Decontamination is the method involving the conversion of toxic chemicals
into harmless products either by degradation or by detoxification. Decontamination
is an important unavoidable part in protection against chemical warfare agents.
The decontaminant should have rapid action, efficiency, non corrosive, safe and
50
washable with water. There are three basic methods of decontamination viz.
physical removal, chemical deactivation, and biological deactivation of the agent.
Though physical and chemical decontamination methods are available to some
extent, biological deactivation has not been developed to the point of being
practical. There is no universal skin decontamination procedure that is effective and
safe. Mustard agents can be hydrolysed by bleach (0.5% hypochlorite solution).
Bleaching powder and chloramines can react violently with sulphur mustard, and
non-poisonous oxidation products are formed. Interestingly, skin burns caused by
mustard exposure do not have the same toxic properties as do thermal burns
(Sollmann, 1957). Skin lesions caused by dermal application of sulphur mustard
can be prevented by adsorbent powders such as Fuller’s earth (a native form of
aluminium silicate), charchol and talcum (Sollman, 1919a,b) as well as household
products such as flour, dutch powder, dry tissue paper and wet tissue paper
removed more than 97% of sulphur mustard (Dacre and Goldman, 1996). The
powder should be used within one minute of exposure. A chemical decontaminant
reported which is effective up to 5 minute post exposure of massive dose of
sulphur mustard (Vijayaraghavan et al, 2002). Wormser et al (2000) developed a
non toxic and nonirritant iodine / povidone-iodine containing preparation which
effectively protect guinea pig skin from 20 minutes post exposure of sulphur
mustard. But there is no recommended decontaminant for nitrogen mustard to
reduce it’s toxicity. There is no specific antidote for nitrogen mustards and sulphur
mustards toxicity. Decontamination of all potentially exposed areas within minutes
after exposure is the only effective means of decreasing tissue damage. Thus, by
the time a patient arrives in the emergency department, decontamination can only
prevent secondary exposure to medical staff; it does not limit the patient’s injury.
Medical treatment is supportive.
51
3.6.2 Drug therapy for mustard agents
3.6.2.1 NAD+ Level Stabilisers
Energy depletion is one of the major consequences of sulphur mustard
toxicity. So, at least in theory, the energy stabilisers have a very important role as
far as medical defence against sulphur mustard is concerned. It was found that
3AB (3-aminobenzamide) and 3 MB ( 3-methoxybenjzmide) prevented the loss of
NAD+ in mouse exposed to sulphur mustard through percutaneous route (Smith et
al, 1991 and Mol et al, 1989). In cultivated human epidermal keratinocytes (Mol et
al, 1989) and in human leukocyte (Meier et al, 1987) the decrease in NAD+ was
reversed by nicotinamide as well as 3- aminobenzamide. But recent studies (Lin et
al, 1994) showed that these compounds did not improve skin lesions significantly
and hence efficacy of these compounds is doubtful.
3.6.2.2 Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
After initial DNA alkylation by sulphur mustard, PARP plays very important
role in the cytopathology induced by sulphur mustard. In addition, it was proposed
that excessive PARP stimulation converts apoptosis to necrosis. It is also involved
in the energy depletion. Thus, PARP inhibitors can restore the energy levels as
well as can change the course of toxicity. Meier and Millard, 1998 showed that two
PARP inhibitors ICD2250 ( 3, 4 - dihydro - 5 - 3- ( methylamino ) - propoxy - 1 - (
2H ) - isoquinolone monohydrochloride and ICD2163 ( 3, 4 - dihydro - 5 -methyl- 1
- (2H) - isoquinolone changed the kinetics of DNA cleavage in human lymphocytes
so that cell death remains apoptotic after sulphur mustard exposure. The
beneficial effect of PARP inhibitors may be related to the blockade of suicide DNA
repair function without affecting the normal functions at cellular and tissue level.
Until date, no work is reported regarding in vivo efficacy of PARP inhibitors.
Niacinamide and 3- aminobenzamide were also shown to be effective in blocking
sulphur mustard induced cell death in human mononuclear leukocytes (Meier,
1996).
52
3.6.2.3 Calcium Channel Blockers and Calmodulin Antagonists
As proposed in thiol - calcium hypothesis, increased calcium may lead to
variety of toxic processes like activation of PARP, phospholipases and proteases.
Calcium channel blockers were tried against dermally exposed mice (Mazumder et
al, 1998) and were found to protect the animals. Calmodulin antagonists such as
trifluoperazine and CGS 9343B were found to prevent biochemical and
pathological changes induced by thermal burns which resembles to burns induced
by sulphur mustard (kim et al, 1996). Further in vivo studies confirmed protective
efficacy of these compounds in water soluble ointment bases against sulphur
mustard induced vesication.
3.6.2.4 Protease Inhibitors
Protease stimulation in the dermo - epidermal junction is directly involved in
blister formation as well as other dermatotoxic effects of sulphur mustard.
Protease inhibitors such as calpain (calcium activated neutral protease inhibitor),
antipain, APMSF and leupeptin inhibited sulphur mustard induced proteolysis in
human peripheral blood lymphocyte culture (Cowan et al, 1992). Niacinamide and
N - acetyl - L - cysteine can also inhibit protease release by inhibiting PARP (Meier
et al, 1987) and by increasing intracellular levels of GSH (Smith et al, 1991)
respectively.
3.6.2.5 Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitors
ATP loss and degradation of ADP increases hypoxanthine levels.
Hypoxanthine is then converted to uric acid by the enzyme xanthine oxidase or it
may be oxidised to reactive oxygen species. By using competitive antagonist of
xanthine oxidase such as hypoxanthine, it is possible to minimise sulphur mustard
induced toxicity (Papiermeister et al, 1991).
3.6.2.6 Anti-inflammatory Agents
One of the initial clinical features of sulphur mustard inhalation is severe
edema and acute inflammatory response, which may lead to cell death (Amir et al,
2000). Sulphur mustard can induce protease release (Cowan et al, 1992),
53
interlukins (Atkins et al, 2000; Ricketts et al, 2000), and various other end products
of cyclo-oxygenase and lipo-oxygenase pathways. Thus anti-inflammatory
compounds may prove beneficial to provide symptomatic relief to a patient
suffering from mild to severe toxic effects of sulphur mustard. Dexamethasone
decreased inflammatory effect of sulphur mustard on alveolar macrophages (Amir
et al, 2000).
3.6.3 Cytoprotection
Cytoprotective agents have been developed as a means of reducing the
toxicity associated with chemotherapeutic agents. The aim of cytoprotective
agents is to improve the therapeutic index of the cytotoxic drugs by reducing the
DLT (Dose Limiting Toxicity) to normal tissue (Links and Lewis, 1999). By
definition, a cytoprotective agent must not compromise the antitumor efficacy of
the chemotherapeutic drug (Links and Lewis, 1999). Ideally, it should be easily
administered, have a reasonable safety profile of its own and cannot interfere with
the delivery of chemotherapy (Capizzi, 1999a; Links and Lewis, 1999). By
improving the patient's tolerance to anticancer therapy, the cytoprotective agents
may offer multiple benefits including potential dose intensification and prolongation
of therapy which may improve response and cure rates. As a result, the costs
associated with supportive care in the event of complications are reduced
significantly and quality of life is improved (Capizzi, 1999a). This also applied to
the toxic effects of nitrogen mustards and sulphur mustard and their prevention by
cytoprotective agents.
The concept of cytoprotection was first introduced by Patt et al (1949) who
reported that rats pretreated with the sulphydryl amino acid cysteine were
protected from Iethal doses of radiation first introduced the concept of
cytoprotection. This sparked the interest in using thiol agents as potential
cytoprotectants (Capizzi, 1999a). Thiol groups contain a nucleophilic sulphur,
which provides an alternative target for the reactive intermediates formed following
treatment with radiation (oxygen free radicals) or alkylating agents (electrophilic
intermediates). These highly reactive species are responsible for both the efficacy
54
and toxicity of anticancer treatments. They bind to various nucleophilic targets
such as DNA, and form covalent bonds without distinction between normal and
cancerous tissue. Therefore, thiol-containing compounds in healthy tissue provide
an alternative nucleophilic target to reactive intermediates generated by radiation
or chemotherapy (Links and Lewis, 1999; Vander and Korst, 1996).
To date, three cytoprotective agents have been approved by international
regulatory agencies. Mesna (Sodium-2-mercaptoethane) is administered to protect
the bladder from toxicity associated with ifosfamide and high-dose
cyclophosphamide whereas dexrazoxane (4-[1-(3,5-dioxopiperazin-1-yl) propan-2-
yl] piperazine-2,6-dione) protects the heart from cumulative cardiotoxic effects
associated with doxorubicin (Capizzi, 1999a). Both of these agents are drug
specific and their protective effects are limited to specific organs. A third agent,
amifostine (WR-2721; Ethyol; S-2 (3-aminopropylamino) ethylphosphoro-thioiç
acid), is the first selective broad-spectrum cytoprotective agent approved by
international regulatory agencies. In this context, broad-spectrum refers to the
protection of multiple organ systems from a broad selection of cytotoxic agents
(Table no. 3.2). The data below shows the cytoprotective affect of amifostine
(Capizzi, 1999a)
The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research originally developed amifostine
as part of an anti-radiation drug- development program of the US Army. Mice,
Dogs and Monkeys that were given Amifostine were protected from lethal doses of
whole body irradiation (Capizzi, 1999a).
Subsequently, it was demonstrated that with Amifostine pretreatment,
normal tissues were protected from the non-specific toxicities of therapeutic doses
of radiation while tumors were not (Yuhas and Storer, 1969). Thereafter, studies
demonstrated that amifostine was effective in protecting normal tissue form the
toxic effects of alkylating agents. cisplatin, anthracyclines and taxanes (Capizzi,
1999c). To date, it is the broad-spectrum cytoprotective agent with the largest
preclinical and clinical database (Capizzi, 1999b).
55
Table 3.2 Cytoprotective spectrum of amifostine (Capizzi, 1999a).
Organs that are affected Drugs
Kidney
Auditory
Peripheral nerves
Bone marrow
Salivary glands
Oral mucosa
Heart
Lung
Esophagus
Small intestine
Colon
Immune system
Testes
Cisplatin
Carboplatin
Cyclophosphamide
Nitrogen mustard
Melphalan
Mitomycin-C
Carmustine
5-flurouracil
ionizing radiation
…others
56
Amifostine is also known to show hepatoprotection in the toxicity caused by
some other toxic compounds, like Dactinomycin that causes extensive liver
damage disease (Valles et al, 1995). How Amifostine act as cytoprotectant is not
very clearly understood, it is being documented that after administration it gets
dephosphorylated to free thiol(WR-1065), which quickly enters the normal tissues
and protects against alkylating agent (Capizzi, 1999c). It can be further oxidized to
disulfide, either symmetrical (WR 33179: may also be cytoprotective (Shigematsu
et al, 1994)) or mixed disulfides with cysteine, Glutathione or Thiol containing
proteins (Figure 3.7) (Capizzi, 1999a). This protection is being attributed to
modulation of glutathione level and protection against lipid peroxidation (Uma devi
and Prasanna, 1990).
The exact mechanism by which WR1065 protects normal tissue has not
been clearly delineated. Several mechanisms have been proposed:
a. The free Thiol can act as a nucleophile that binds directly to and
detoxifies the active spices of alkylating and platinum agents (Capizzi,
1999a; Nici and Calabresi, 1999).
b. WR1065 can act as a scavenger of oxygen free radicals formed after
chemo- or radiation therapy (Capizzi, 1999a; Nici and Calabresi, 1999)
by donating a hydrogen to repair damaged target molecules such as
DNA (Grdina et al, 1999; Nici and Calabresi, 1999).
c. Treating normal cells with WR1065 after treatment has been shown to
reduce radiation- and chemical induced apoptosis. It is hypothesized
that either WR 1065 or WR 3278 (symmetrical disulfide) binds to DNA
and nuclear proteins altering the structures of the internucleosomal
region of the chromatin thus making them Less vulnerable to
degradation. Further work is still required in this area to explore the
Cytoprotective implications of this observation (Capizzi, 1999a).
d. The symmetrical disulfide metabolite of Amifostine, WR33278, also
demonstrates a cytoprotective effect (Grdina et al, 1995). It can bind to
57
DNA and enhance relaxation of DNA super coils that are mediated by
topoisomerase I. It has also been shown that this disulfide metabolite
can protect cells from radiation-induced cytotoxicity and mutations
(Capizzi, 1999a).
e. Recently, selective modulation of modulation of intracellular
glutathione levels by Amifostine, or more specifically, WR1065 has
been proposed as a possible mechanism of action of the
cytoprotective effect. This is hypothesized to occur via enhanced
cysteine delivery into normal cells (Issels and Nagele, 1989; Souid et
al, 1999).
Oxidative stress is one of the important consequences of sulphur mustard
toxicity (Kumar et al, 2001 and Pant et al, 2004). Sulphur mustard has a high
affinity towards glutathione that is one of the important cell constituents.
Antioxidants can protect the normal cell by inhibiting sulphur mustard induced
GSH depletion. Glutathione and its dependent enzymes provide the primary
defense mechanism in cells against the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic
agents (Wolf et al, 1987). The anticancer drugs in which glutathione may play an
important role in detoxification can be divided into two categories:-
i. Drugs that are detoxified by direct conjugation with glutathione.
ii. Drugs that form reactive oxygen species (ROS, which are subsequently
detoxified by the oxidation of GSH to GSSG catalyzed by glutathione
peroxidases (Wolf et al, 1987).
The relative abundance of glutathione in normal and tumor cells is an
important factor in determining the therapeutic index of chemotherapy. Studies
with in vitro and in vivo have showed that the total glutathione concentration is
positively correlated with resistance to chemotherapy and radiation therapy (Bump
and Brown, 1990).
58
The cytotoxicity of mustard agents and production of ROS has been
proposed to result from electrophilic or oxidative stress with depletion of cellular
detoxifying thiol levels including glutathione. Also, ROS are transformed by iron-
requiring reactions into highly toxic oxidants that cause a chain reaction with
membrane phospholipids to form lipid peroxides, leading to loss of membrane
function, membrane fluidity, and finally membrane integrity. Provision and
availability of scavengers of ROS and electrophilic compounds such as
glutathione, sulfhydryls compounds, antioxidants, and substances that will
increase production of endogenous scavengers may be considered protective and
useful. Thereby, the role of cytoprotective compounds such as amifostine and its
analogues like DRDE-07, 09, 10 etc. against nitrogen mustards might be
interesting to be investigated in experimental animal models. Amifostine [S-2(3-
aminopropylamino) ethyl phosphorothioate] and its analogue DRDE-07 [S-2(2-
aminoethylamino) ethyl phenyl sulfide] have been shown to protect sulphur
mustard toxicity (Bhattacharya et al, 2001, and Vijayaraghavan et al, 2001). For
sulphur mustard systemic toxicity a variety of flavonide have been reported to be
very effective (Vijayaraghavan et al, 2006, 2008) but they have been found to be
effective only when the antidote were given as pretreatment and by parenteral
route.
Several antidotes have been reported for the systemic toxicity of nitrogen
mustards and sulphur mustard in experimental animals viz. N-Acetyl cysteine,
Sodium Thiosulphate, Vitamin E (Vojvodic et al, 1985; Khan et al, 1992). All the
antidotes so far screened have given only very limited protection.
Cl CH2 CH2 N CH2 CH2 Cl
C2H5
Cl CH2 CH2 N CH2 CH2 Cl
CH3
Cl CH2 CH2 N CH2 CH2 Cl
CH2 CH2 Cl
Chemical Structures of Mustard Agents
Nitrogen mustard (HN-1) Nitrogen mustard (HN-2)
bis-(2-chloroethyl)ethylamine bis-(2-chloroethyl)methylamine
Nitrogen mustard (HN-3) Sulphur mustard (SM)
tris-(2-chloroethyl)amine 2,2-dichloroethyl sulphide
Figure 3.1 Chemical Structure of Mustard Agents
Cl CH2 CH2 S CH2 CH2 Cl
Figure 3.3 (A) A typical blister after sulphur mustard exposure.
(B) Extensive skin injury after sulphur mustard exposure.
A
B
Nitrogen mustard/ Sulphur mustard
Reactive intermediates
(carbenium cation)
Figure 3.4 Proposed mechanism of action of mustard agents taken from
Kehe and Szinicz, 2005.
Decreased Cellular Defence
DNA
Damage
Alkylation of Membrane proteins
Reactive oxygen species
Altered protein synthesis
Altered signal transduction
Enzyme inhibition
Alkylation of functional groups
Membrane damage PARP activation
Cell cycle arrest
Metabolic impairment
Necrosis
Apoptosis
Decreased repair Tissue Damage
The Major Purines The Major Pyrimidines
Adenine Thyamine
Guanine Cytosine
Uracil
Figure 3.5 The major purines and pyrimidines shows sites of alkylation.
N
NOH
O
H CH3
123 4
65
6543
2 1
N
N
NH2
OH
N
NOH
O
H12
3 4 56
65
432
1H
H
N
NH
N
N
O
H2N
7
89
65
432
1 7
89
N
N
N
N
H
NH2
H H
(A) 7- ETHYL -THIO ETHYL GUANINE
(B) O-6-ETHYL THIO ETHYL GUANINE
(C) N, N’- BIS [2-(7-GUANINYL)-ETHYL] AMINE
Figure 3.6 Products from alkylation of DNA by nitrogen mustard andsulphur mustard.
CH2CH2NHCH2CH2N
NH
N
NH
H
HN
O
N
NH
N
NH
H
HN
O
N
NH
N
NH
CH2CH2NHCH2CH2ClH
HN
O
N
N
O
H
N
NH
CH2CH2SCH2CH2Cl
H
HN