16
Review Two-parts pricing: Definition and Examples Best practice of two-parts pricing (with homogeneous consumers)

Review

  • Upload
    syshe

  • View
    38

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Review. Two-parts pricing: Definition and Examples Best practice of two-parts pricing (with homogeneous consumers). Lecture 16 Bundling and Tying. BUNDLING. Definitions. A bundle is a group of products or services sold as a package. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Review

Review

Two-parts pricing: Definition and Examples

Best practice of two-parts pricing (with homogeneous consumers)

Page 2: Review

Lecture 16 Bundling and Tying

Page 3: Review

BUNDLING

Page 4: Review

Definitions

• A bundle is a group of products or services sold as a package.

• The constituents, which can be sold separately, are called ‘components’.

• Three commonly used terms:• Pure bundling. Only the bundle is offered by the

seller (at a bundle price).• Pure components. Only the components are offered

(at their separate prices).• Mixed bundling – The bundle as well as some or all

components, or smaller bundles, are priced and offered for sale.

4

Page 5: Review

Examples

• Pure bundling• Music CD (when singles are not sold)• Block booking of movies

• Mixed bundling (bundle and components)• Gateway computer, monitor and printer• Car with insurance• Restaurant menus• Cable channels• Holiday package

• Pure components

5

Page 6: Review

Illustration

• Two components A and C. Let A + C = bundle B.

• Pure bundling: B is offered at PB and A & C not offered. (Offering A & C at extremely high prices is effectively the same).

• Pure components: A is offered at PA and C at PC, and no bundle.(Customers can make their own bundle at price PA+PC).

• If A, B, and C are offered at prices PA, PB, and PC, then the following relationships are likely to hold

• PB < PA + PC (else customers will not buy the bundle)• PA, PC < PB (else customers will not buy the components)

6

Page 7: Review

Exceptions to PB < PA + PC

The bundle price can be higher than the sum of component prices when it offers a convenience, lower assembly cost, guarantee of quality

Example – A TV-VCR combo may be higher than the price of standalone TV and VCR.

7

Page 8: Review

The “value meal” example

Size of segmen

t

Willingness-to-pay for fries

Willingness-to-pay

for burgers

Pure componentsprofit

Pure bundling profit

Fries lovers

100 $1.50 $0.50

Burger lovers

100 $0.50 $1.50

$300 $400

Page 9: Review

Take-away

A demand side explanation for bundling is that heterogeneous customer segments have demands for the components products that negatively correlate.

Bundling improves profit by transferring customer surplus (“money left on the table”) from one component to the other.

Bundling reduces heterogeneity in valuations, which causes inefficiency in pricing.

9

Page 10: Review

TYING

Page 11: Review

Definitions

• Tying differs from bundling as:

• Bundling occurs if the firm sells packages containing at least two different products or services.

• Tying occurs if the firm sells packages containing at least two units of the same product or service.

• Two commonly used terms:

• Pure tying. Only one package containing at least two units of the good is offered for sale.

• Mixed tying. If more than one package is offered for sale, and at least one package contains at least two units.

11

Page 12: Review

Examples

• Pure tying

• Shopping TV which “doubles the offer” • Dozens of eggs

• Mixed tying (bundle and components)

• Season and daily ski pass

• CU football Season and single-event tickets

Page 13: Review

The “ski pass” example

Day # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6

Willingness to pay

$7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2

Price $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7

Number of days

sold

Profit

“A la carte” approach (cost = $0)

Page 14: Review

The “ski pass” example

Number of days “tied”

1 2 3 4 5 6

Profit

“Season pass” approach (cost = $0)

Number of days “tied”

1 2 3 4 5 6

Cost

Profit

“Season pass” approach (cost = $3)

Page 15: Review

Take-away

A demand side explanation for tying is that consumers have diminishing values for additional units of the same product/service, thus these values are negatively correlated.

Tying improves profit by transferring customer surplus (“money left on the table”) from one unit to the other.

Tying reduces heterogeneity in valuations, which causes inefficiency in pricing.

The size of the package is negatively related with the marginal cost

15

Page 16: Review

Next Lecture

Revenue Management I