53
Presented by: Sumeet Ghodke (Reg. No. -122090005) Guided by- Prof. Bhagwat M. Tech (Machine Design) Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute, Matunga, Mumbai- 400 019. Page 1 of 53

Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

P r e s e n t e d b y :S u m e e t G h o d k e ( R e g . N o . - 1 2 2 0 9 0 0 0 5 )

G u i d e d b y - P r o f . B h a g w a t

M . T e c h ( M a c h i n e D e s i g n ) V e e r m a t a J i j a b a i T e c h n o l o g i c a l I n s t i t u t e , M a t u n g a , M u m b a i - 4 0 0 0 1 9 .

Page 1 of 42

Page 2: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Table of Contents1. Abstract............................................................................................................................................4

2. Introduction.....................................................................................................................................5

3. Reasons for reverse engineering.....................................................................................................8

4. Reverse engineering of mechanical devices....................................................................................9

5. COMPUTER-AIDED REVERSE ENGINEERING..................................................................................10

6. Legality...........................................................................................................................................11

7. Case Study: “DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF A PRESSURE TRANSDUCER FOR THE CONDITION MONITORING OF THE OIL LUBRICATION SYSTEM FOR GENERATOR SET”............................................12

A. INTRODUCTION: THE SYSTEM...................................................................................................................12B. STEPS OF PROJECT WORK.........................................................................................................................13C. BACKGROUND:..........................................................................................................................................14HOW OIL CONDITION MONITORING OCCURS?..............................................................................................................14D. MARKET SURVEY.......................................................................................................................................15E. MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE SINGLE ACTING CYLINDER FOR TRANSDUCER........................................20F. CYLINDER..................................................................................................................................................21G. SPRING......................................................................................................................................................24H. PISTON......................................................................................................................................................26I. JOINT USED...............................................................................................................................................28J. ‘O’ RING.....................................................................................................................................................30K. PREDICTING SEAL FRICTION......................................................................................................................32L. MEASUREMENT OF LINEAR DISPLACEMENT............................................................................................35M. TESTING OF THE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER...........................................................................................36N. SWOT ANALYSIS........................................................................................................................................39

8. CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................................40

9. REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................40

Page 2 of 42

Page 3: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

List of Figures

Figure 1: Computer-added reverse engineering framework....................................................................7Figure 2: The sequence of steps required for the reconstruction of a model from multiple overlapping scans.........................................................................................................................................................8Figure 3: Oil lubrication system..............................................................................................................13Figure 4: Pressure gauge mounting on gen-set......................................................................................14Figure 5: Assembly of RICO pressure transducer....................................................................................17Figure 6: Bourdon tube..........................................................................................................................18Figure 7: Schematic diaphragm pressure gauge.....................................................................................18Figure 8: Set of bellow pressure gauge...................................................................................................18Figure 9: Single acting cylinder...............................................................................................................19Figure 10: U-tube manometer................................................................................................................19Figure 11: ANSYS results for cylinder......................................................................................................24Figure 12: Cylinder.................................................................................................................................24Figure 13: Spring.....................................................................................................................................26Figure 14: Piston with two grooves........................................................................................................27Figure 15: Piston with one groove..........................................................................................................27Figure 16: Teflon piston head (Detachable)...........................................................................................27Figure 17: Threaded teflon piston head (detachable)............................................................................28Figure 18: Threaded joint used...............................................................................................................29Figure 19: ANSYS results for head hex....................................................................................................29Figure 20: ANSYS results for end hex......................................................................................................30Figure 21: Basic O-Ring...........................................................................................................................31Figure 22: Gland and O-Ring Seal...........................................................................................................31Figure 23: O-Ring under pressure...........................................................................................................31Figure 24: O-Ring Extruding....................................................................................................................31Figure 25: O-Ring Under Extrusion Failure.............................................................................................31Figure 26: O-Ring....................................................................................................................................32Figure 27:Friction due to O-ring compression........................................................................................34Figure 28: Friction due to fluid pressure.................................................................................................34Figure 29:Variation in Pressure Force (Fp), Friction Force (Fc) with Cylinder ID.....................................35Figure 30: Principal of linear potentiometer..........................................................................................36Figure 31: Principal of LVDT....................................................................................................................36Figure 32: Bonded resistance strain gauge.............................................................................................36Figure 33: Variable area capacitors........................................................................................................36Figure 34: Test rig suggested..................................................................................................................37Figure 35: Pressure Vs Displacement Graph for 8mm ID cylinder..........................................................38Figure 36: Pressure Vs Displacement Graph for 10mm ID cylinder........................................................39

Page 3 of 42

Page 4: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

List of tables

Table 1: Design selection chart...............................................................................................................20Table 2: Cylinder Thickness for 8mm ID Cylinder...................................................................................22Table 3: Selected thickness for 8 mm ID cylinder...................................................................................23Table 4: Cylinder Thickness for 10mm ID Cylinder.................................................................................23Table 5: Selected thickness for 10 mm ID cylinder.................................................................................23Table 6: Stresses on cylinder by ANSYS..................................................................................................24Table 7: Spring manufactured................................................................................................................26Table 8: Stresses on head hex by ANSYS................................................................................................29Table 9: Stresses on end hex by ANSYS..................................................................................................30Table 10: Important parameters for friction determination...................................................................33Table 11: Determined values for friction determination........................................................................34Table 12: Values from graph..................................................................................................................34Table 13: Total available force for piston movement.............................................................................35

Page 4 of 42

Page 5: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

1. AbstractReverse engineering is the process of discovering the technological principles of a device,

object, or system through analysis of its structure, function, and operation. It often involves

taking something (a mechanical device, electronic component, computer program, or

biological, chemical, or organic matter) apart and analyzing its workings in detail to be used in

maintenance, or to try to make a new device or program that does the same thing without using

or simply duplicating (without understanding) the original.

Reverse engineering has its origins in the analysis of hardware for commercial or military

advantage. The purpose is to deduce design decisions from end products with little or no

additional knowledge about the procedures involved in the original production. The same

techniques are subsequently being researched for application to legacy software systems, not

for industrial or defence ends, but rather to replace incorrect, incomplete, or otherwise

unavailable documentation.

Page 5 of 42

Page 6: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

2. IntroductionEngineering is a growing field that continues to evolve to suit the rapid changes of the 21st

century. Engineering fields are constantly improving upon current designs and methods to

make life simple and easier. When referring to technology, simple and easy can be directly

related to fast and accurate. Simple meaning that, you do not use up valuable time in assembly

or doing a specific task. Easy meaning how many times you will have to do the process or task.

When we think of engineering we think of the general meaning of designing a product from a

blue print or plan. Engineering is described as “the application of scientific and mathematical

principles to practical ends such as the design, manufacture, and operation of efficient and

economical structures, machines, processes, and systems”. This type of engineering is more

commonly known as Forward Engineering. An emerging engineering concept is utilizing

forward engineering in a reverse way. This method is more commonly referred to as Reverse

Engineering.

“Reverse Engineering is the practice of studying a finished product, a physical device or a

software package, in order to learn something about how it works or how it was

manufactured.”

Reverse engineering is the opposite of forward engineering. It takes an existing product, and

creates a CAD model, for modification or reproduction to the design aspect of the product. It

can also be defined as the process or duplicating an existing component by capturing the

components physical dimensions. Reverse engineering is usually undertaken in order to

redesign the system for better maintainability or to produce a copy of a system without access

to the design from which it was originally produced.

There has been a mandatory need for 3D reconstruction of scenes and objects by the

manufacturing industry, medical industry, military branches and research facilities.

Manufacturing industry utilizes reverse engineering for its fast rapid prototyping abilities and

accuracy associated with the production of new parts. This fast prototyping is done through the

use of CAD model designs for inspection purposes. Military branches also utilize reverse

engineering to perform inspection task that are associated with safety.

The goal of reverse engineering an object is to successfully generate a 3D CAD model of an

object that can be used for future modelling of parts where there exists no CAD model.

To generate clean, smooth 3D models which requires a strong, robust image acquisition system

that can acquire data with a high level of accuracy in a sufficient time frame. Our system uses

range and intensity images of objects as input. The output is transformed data that is

represented as 3D reconstructions of geometric primitives.

Page 6 of 42

Page 7: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Figure 1: Computer-added reverse engineering framework

There are several building blocks or steps, which determine the process of building a complete

3D model from range and intensity data. These steps, listed in Figure 1 show the format of how

range image data is acquired, transformed and generated. This flowchart can be characterized

as a generic basic principle for reverse engineering. The steps shown often overlap during the

process of each stage.

There are many different approaches to acquiring 3D data of objects of various structural

shapes. All 3D-based machine vision systems ultimately acquire and operate on image data.

Acquisition can be based on collecting the Z-axis data using linear area, laser radar laser

scanning techniques, point detectors, or other approaches. These systems incorporate the

computer power to manage process and analyze the data acquired. In addition to these tasks,

make decisions relating the data to the application without operator intervention. This

characterizes what is meant by the term ‘‘3D-based machine vision”.

Although both systems primary focus is reconstruction of real world objects and scene, we will

investigate the limitation of both systems. Although the structured lighting system is not

designed for reverse engineering use, we will compare the modelling aspects of this system for

reverse engineering of automotive parts to the laser range system.

Page 7 of 42

Page 8: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Figure 2: The sequence of steps required for the reconstruction of a model from multiple overlapping scans

Figure 2 is a more detailed description of Figure 1. The blue area best describes the data

capturing section, while the yellow and orange highlights the data pre and post-processing

steps and the final outcome is a 3D CAD model. In the data segmentation stage several steps

are taken to generate noise free, smooth models of the part. In data reduction, data such as the

noise, outlier or erroneous background information is eliminated. Outliers are false data points

that are captured during acquisition. Surface smoothing and multi-view registration are

included in data integration. Surface smoothing is an additional feature to eliminate noisy data

and make the surface of the object more uniform in texture. This can be performed both before

and/or after several views of the part are merged. After all the steps are complete a final 3D

CAD model is generated.

Page 8 of 42

Page 9: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

3. Reasons for reverse engineering Interoperability.

Lost documentation: Reverse engineering often is done because the documentation of a

particular device has been lost (or was never written), and the person who built it is no

longer available.

Integrated circuits often seem to have been designed on obsolete, proprietary systems,

which means that the only way to incorporate the functionality into new technology is to

reverse-engineer the existing chip and then re-design it.

Product analysis. To examine how a product works, what components it consists of,

estimate costs, and identify potential patent infringement.

Digital update/correction. To update the digital version (e.g. CAD model) of an object to

match an "as-built" condition.

Security auditing.

Military or commercial espionage. Learning about an enemy's or competitor's latest

research by stealing or capturing a prototype and dismantling it.

Removal of copy protection, circumvention of access restrictions.

Creation of unlicensed/unapproved duplicates.

Academic/learning purposes.

Curiosity

Competitive technical intelligence (understand what your competitor is actually doing

versus what they say they are doing)

Learning: learn from others' mistakes. Do not make the same mistakes that others have

already made and subsequently corrected.

Page 9 of 42

Page 10: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

4. Reverse engineering of mechanical devices

As computer-aided design (CAD) has become more popular, reverse engineering has become a

viable method to create a 3D virtual model of an existing physical part for use in 3D CAD,

CAM, CAE and other software. The reverse-engineering process involves measuring an object

Testing and then reconstructing it as a 3D model. The physical object can be measured using

3D scanning technologies like CMMs, laser scanners, structured light digitizers or computed

tomography. The measured data alone, usually represented as a point cloud, lacks topological

information and is therefore often processed and modelled into a more usable format such as a

triangular-faced mesh, a set of NURBS surfaces or a CAD model.

The point clouds produced by 3D scanners are usually not used directly since they are very

large unwieldy data sets, although for simple visualization and measurement in the architecture

and construction world, points may suffice. Most applications instead use polygonal 3D

models, NURBS surface models, or editable feature-based CAD models. The process of

converting a point cloud into a usable 3D model in any of the forms described above is called

“modelling”.

Page 10 of 42

Page 11: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

5. COMPUTER-AIDED REVERSE ENGINEERING

Reverse Engineering originally emerged as the answer to provide spares for replacing broken

or worn out parts for which no technical data was available. This can be the case if the part was

originally imported (without drawings) or the drawings being misplaced or lost. Reengineering

or reverse engineering such parts can be a less expensive option compared to re-importing, not

only for immediate replacement, but also to create additional spares to maintain the product

over a longer period.

Reverse Engineering has been defined as a process for obtaining the technical data of a critical

spare component. Computer-aided reverse engineering relies on the use of computer-aided

tools for obtaining the part geometry, identifying its material, improving the design, tooling

fabrication, manufacturing planning and physical realization (Figure 1). A solid model of the

part is the backbone for computer-aided reverse engineering. The model data can be exported

from or imported into CAD/CAE/CAM systems using standard formats such as IGES, STL,

VDA and STEP.

The three most important sets of data in reverse engineering activities relate to the CAD model

generation, material identification and rapid manufacturing. These are described in the

following sections.

Page 11 of 42

Page 12: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

6. LegalityUnited States

In the United States even if an artifact or process is protected by trade secrets, reverse-

engineering the artifact or process is often lawful as long as it is obtained legitimately. Patents,

on the other hand, need a public disclosure of an invention, and therefore, patented items do

not necessarily have to be reverse-engineered to be studied. (However, an item produced fewer

than one or more patents could also include other technology that is not patented and not

disclosed.) One common motivation of reverse engineering is to determine whether a

competitor's product contains patent infringements or copyright infringements.

The reverse engineering of software in the US is generally a breach of contract as most EULAs

specifically prohibit it, and courts have found such contractual prohibitions to override the

copyright law which expressly permits it; see Bowers v. Baystate Technologies.

European Union

Article 6 of the 1991 EU Computer Programs Directive allows reverse engineering for the

purposes of interoperability, but prohibits it for the purposes of creating a competing product,

and also prohibits the public release of information obtained through reverse engineering of

software.

In 2009, the EU Computer Program Directive was superseded and the directive now states:

The unauthorised reproduction, translation, adaptation or transformation of the form of the

code in which a copy of a computer program has been made available constitutes an

infringement of the exclusive rights of the author. Nevertheless, circumstances may exist when

such a reproduction of the code and translation of its form are indispensable to obtain the

necessary information to achieve the interoperability of an independently created program with

other programs. An objective of this exception is to make it possible to connect all components

of a computer system, including those of different manufacturers, so that they can work

together. Such an exception to the author's exclusive rights may not be used in a way which

prejudices the legitimate interests of the rightholder or which conflicts with a normal

exploitation of the program.

Page 12 of 42

Page 13: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

7. Case Study: “DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF A PRESSURE TRANSDUCER FOR THE CONDITION MONITORING OF THE OIL LUBRICATION SYSTEM FOR GENERATOR SET”

A. INTRODUCTION: THE SYSTEM

In the system, the oil is forced under pressure through the oil line by a pump. In the oil line it

passes through the filter and then to the manifold. The manifold supplies the oil to the main

lubrication system and various components requiring oil. One oil line is passed to the pressure

gauge which measures the pressure in the oil line produced by the pump.

Figure 3: Oil lubrication system

Looking at the schematic, many factors come into play when setting oil pressure. Each of the

manifold outputs is designed for certain volume, and the individual calculated circuit

resistances come into play to determine overall resistance to oil flow. This is much like having

four or five hoses connected to one hose bib on the side of the house if one bursts, all will lose

pressure. If one is plugged up, the pressure increases for the rest. This system is much the

same. So if an output is clogged, like the governor line for instance, pressure will rise. If your

transmission has worn out main bearings allowing much of the oil to slide back into the

crankcase prematurely, pressure will be lower. The bottom line here is that any rather sudden

rise or fall in oil pressure should be taken as a signal that your engine’s oiling system needs

attention. This way pressure gauge plays an important role oil lubrication system.

Page 13 of 42

Page 14: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

PRESSURE GAUGE MOUNTING ON GEN-SET

Figure 4: Pressure gauge mounting on gen-set

B. STEPS OF PROJECT WORK

Market survey

Analyzing available market products

Brain storming for all possible concepts of pressure transducers

Studying for best workable concept

Drawing the basic structure of the pressure transducer

Optimizing the design with dimensions, material, joining processes, surface finish, etc.

Manufacturing the prototype of the product

Testing the product and reviewing design

Working on the steps of aesthetics, durability, safety, recyclability, ease of use, etc.

Finalizing the design with optimum parameters

Page 14 of 42

Page 15: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

C. BACKGROUND: How oil condition monitoring occurs?

An oil condition monitoring service gives you an ongoing program of sampling, analysis and

reporting. It provides the information you need to pinpoint and solve equipment problems as

well as implement a more effective maintenance system.

Lubricating oils contain all the requisite additives to protect the equipment from wear,

corrosion and excess friction. The additives in the oil are multi-functional, therefore, it is

important they do not deplete (and is one of the reasons oil types should not be mixed). This is

particularly important in long term usage.

a) On-line oil condition monitoring

Oil is forced under pressure through the oil line by a pump. Filtered oil is then forced through

oil lines to the manifold. The manifold supplies the oil to the main lubrication system and

various components requiring oil. One oil line from manifold is passed to the pressure gauge

which measures the pressure in the oil line produced by the pump. An oil pressure gauge gives

an excellent indication of the health of various systems in the engine. The key is to establish

baseline readings when the engine is healthy, and then be aware of any changes over the time.

b) Cause of low pressure: The contaminant in oil line and mostly in the filter block the flow of oil in the system

which tends to reduce the pressure at which the is to be supplied to the engine and other

parts.

Low oil level

Damaged oil pan or pick-up tube

Worn Oil Pump - This could be anything from a slight reduction all the way to

catastrophic failure (which is rare unless the pump has ingested bits of metal from some

other failure).

c) Cause of high pressure:

High oil pressure is not generally a concern, but if pressure suddenly increases, there may be a

problem with the pressure relief valve. Switching to higher viscosity oil will also show higher

readings.

Page 15 of 42

Page 16: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

D. MARKET SURVEY

The project started with a search for all available and possible mechanisms for the particular

objective of condition monitoring of lubrication system ie. pressure gauge. Starting with

internet, we found many makers of such pressure transducers with different principles been

utilized some of which are also used for automobiles application.

a) COMPETITOR MANUFACTURER Pricol

RICO

Saudamini

VDO

b) RICO COMPONENT ANALYSIS

ADVANTAGES

Robust construction

Small in size

Ease of mounting

DRAWBACKS

Hystersis due to torsional spring

Not precisely and accurate

Assembly not easy to repair

Less life due to use of diaphragm

Page 16 of 42

Page 17: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Page 17 of 42

Figure 5: Assembly of RICO pressure transducer

Page 18: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

c) DIFFERENT MECHANISMS FOR PRESSURE MEASUREMENTa) Bourdon tube:

Figure 6: Bourdon tube

b) Diaphragm :

The diaphragm pressure gauge uses the elastic deformation of a diaphragm instead of a liquid

level to measure the difference between an unknown pressure and a reference pressure.

Figure 7: Schematic diaphragm pressure gauge

c) The set of bellow:

Figure 8: Set of bellow pressure gauge

Page 18 of 42

Page 19: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Bellow type pressure gauges use a spring loaded elastic material bellow to measure the

pressure and the indication is with linkages.

d) Single acting cylinder:

Piston cylinder type is utilized in this kind of pressure gauge assembly, where on one side of

piston there is the application of pressure and on the other side a counter weight is applied

which also measures the deflection, hence giving pressure reading.

Figure 9: Single acting cylinder

e) Manometer:

Manometers are working on the principle of hydrostatic balancing. The force acting due to one

liquid column on the same level or reference balances the force acting due to another liquid

column.

Figure 10: U-tube manometer

Page 19 of 42

Page 20: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

f) DESIGN SELECTION

Parameter

Bour

don

tube

Dia

phra

gm

Set o

f bel

low

Sing

le a

cting

cylin

der

Man

omet

er

Ease of manufacturing © © © © ©

Ease of assembly © © ©

Ease of calibration © © © © ©

Design strength © © ©

Output accuracy © ©

Product reliability © © © ©

Long product durability © ©

Low product cost © © ©

Table 1: Design selection chart

INFERENCE

Single acting cylinder assembly has the most no. of checks, which indicates that it has the most

no. of desired properties with this mechanism. For this particular application of condition

monitoring of lubrication system the output is required for the change in pressure not for

accurate readings, hence the single acting cylinder mechanism is best suited for the application

of pressure measurement.

Page 20 of 42

Page 21: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

E. MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE SINGLE ACTING CYLINDER FOR TRANSDUCER

1. Cylinder Design

2. Helical Compression Spring Design

3. Piston Design

4. Joint Used

5. ‘O’ Ring Selection

6. Protective Cover

7. Electronic System and Pointer Arrangement

These are the major components of the single acting cylinder assembly for the pressure

transducer. Designing for strength, manufacturing, assembly, aesthetics and environmental

impact completes the primary design of pressure transducer.

Page 21 of 42

Page 22: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

F. CYLINDER

i. Different theories of failures used in the design of the cylinders subjected to internal

pressure are

1. Maximum principal stress theory (Lame’s theory)

2. Maximum principal strain theory

3. Maximum shear stress theory

4. Distortion energy theory

ii. Formulae Used:

A. Maximum principal strain theory (Clavarino’s theory)

t=[Di/2[√ σ+ p (1−2 v )σ−p (1+v )

−1] .]B. Maximum principal strain theory (Birnie’s theory)

t=[Di/2[√ σ+ p (1−v )σ−p (1+v )

−1] .]C. Maximum shear stress theory

t=[Di/2[√ ττ−p

−1] .]D. Distortion energy theory

t=[Di/2[√ σσ−√ 3 p

−1] .]iii. SET-1

1. Pressure=P = 5 bar = 0.5 N/mm2

2. Dia. Of Piston=Di= 8 mm

3. Factor of safety= 4

material syt per. stress (sper)

per. shear stress

(ss)

thickness by clavarino’s

theory

thickness by birnie’s theory

thickness by maximum

shear stress theory

thickness by distortion

energy theory

  (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)Steel 480 120 60 0.014218550 0.016722480 0.016771562 0.014512351

Brass 200 50 25 0.034300754 0.040323599 0.040610178 0.035097611

Page 22 of 42

Table 2: Cylinder Thickness for 8mm ID Cylinder

Page 23: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

The cylinder is provided with a threading at both ends hence forming a critical thickness at that

section.

Thread used: M12×1.25

The thickness allowance for the threads t=0.77mm

Total thickness required= t+safe value of thickness from chart

Material Total thickness required (mm) Approximated thickness (mm)

Steel 0.77+0.01677=0.78677 2

Brass 0.77+0.04061=0.81061 2

Table 3: Selected thickness for 8 mm ID cylinder

(with considering the manufacturing limitation the thickness is assumed as 2mm)

iv. SET-21. Pressure=P = 5 bar = 0.5 N/mm2

2. Dia. Of Piston=Di= 10 mm

3. Factor of safety= 4

material syt per. stress (sper)

per. shear stress

(ss)

thickness by clavarino’s

theory

thickness by birnie’s theory

thickness by maximum

shear stress theory

thickness by distortion

energy theory

  (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)Steel 480 120 60 0.017773187 0.020903101 0.020964452 0.018140443

Brass 200 50 25 0.042875942 0.050404499 0.050762722 0.043872014

The cylinder is provided with a threading at both ends hence forming a critical thickness at that

section.

Thread used:

M14×1.5

The thickness allowance for the threads t=1.08mm

Total thickness required= t+safe value of

thickness from chart

Material Total thickness required (mm) Approximated thickness (mm)

Steel 1.08+0.02096=1.10096 2

Brass 1.08+0.05076=1.13076 2

Table 5: Selected thickness for 10 mm ID cylinder

Page 23 of 42

Table 4: Cylinder Thickness for 10mm ID Cylinder

Page 24: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

v. INFERENCE

1. With the consideration of material availability, ease of manufacturing and the critical

thickness required for brass and M.S., they are selected for the prototype design purpose.

2. Not knowing the critical diameter for least friction between O-ring and cylinder the two

diameters 8mm and 10mm are selected for analysis.

a) ANSYS REPORT FOR CYLINDER

Figure 11: ANSYS results for cylinder

i. INFERENCE

TypeEquivalent (von-

Mises) StressMaximum

Principal StressMaximum Shear

StressTotal

Deformation

Minimum 1.1252e-003 MPa -1.1213 MPa 5.6626e-004 MPa 0. mm

Maximum

1.6202 MPa 0.28252 MPa 0.88713 MPa3.0369e-005

mm

Table 6: Stresses on cylinder by ANSYS

With reference to allowable stress on brass (50 MPa), the maximum stress developed in

cylinder (1.6202 MPa) from ANSYS, the cylinder is safe.

Page 24 of 42

Page 25: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Figure 12: Cylinder

G. SPRING

The design of a new spring involves the following considerations:

i. Space into which the spring must fit and operate.

ii. Values of working forces and deflections.

iii. Accuracy and reliability needed.

iv. Tolerances and permissible variations in specifications.

SPRING CHARACTRISTICS

End style- Square and ground end

Spring material- Unalloyed, oil hardened and tempered spring steel valve spring wire

(VW)

Expected deflection- 22.5mm for 7.5 bar pressure

FORMULAE AND DATA USED FOR DESIGN

1. Modulus of rigidity (G) = 83170 N/mm2

2. Spring Index (C) = Dd

3. Wahl’s Factor (Kw) = (4C−1)(4 C+1)

–0.615

C

4. Number of Turns (N) = Gd

8 C3 k

5. Total number of turns (N t ) = N + 2

6. Working Length (Lw ¿ = 8 FN D3

G d4

7. Solid Length (Ls ¿ = N t * d

8. Clearance Allowance (Lc) = 15% of working length

9. Total Length (Lf ¿=LW+LS+Li +Lc

Page 25 of 42

Page 26: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

10. Pitch (Ps) = L f

N t−1

11. Shear Stress (ح) = 8 F C

π d2

Dimensions of the springs manufactured:

Parameter Spring 1 Spring 2

Mean spring diameter 5.8 mm 8 mm

Inner diameter 5 mm 7 mm

Outer diameter 6.6 mm 9 mm

Pitch 3 mm 4.5 mm

Total no. of turns 15 10

Wire diameter 0.8 mm 1 mm

Free length 42 mm 40.5 mm

Material Spring steel Spring steel

Type of end Square and ground end Square and ground end

Spring hand Right handed Right handed

Table 7: Spring manufactured

Figure 13: Spring

Page 26 of 42

Page 27: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

H. PISTON

The function of piston is to take pressure of oil on one side and on the other side the spring

force. As the stresses acting on the piston are very small compared to the piston strength hence

the piston is not designed on strength basis.

DIFFERENT PISTON DESIGNS

a) PISTON WITH TWO GROOVES

Figure 14: Piston with two grooves

Characteristics

No leakage observed

Two O-rings helps in avoiding oscillation of piston

b) PISTON WITH ONE GROOVE

Figure 15: Piston with one groove

Characteristics

Leakage was observed after 3.2 bar pressure

c) TEFLON PISTON HEAD AND BRASS ROD (DETACHABLE)

Figure 16: Teflon piston head (Detachable)

Page 27 of 42

Page 28: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Characteristics

Leakage was observed after 1.2 bar pressure

Kinematic constraints are utilised for improving manufacturing

d) THREADED TEFLON PISTON HEAD AND BRASS ROD

Figure 17: Threaded teflon piston head (detachable)

Characteristics

Leakage was observed after 3.2 bar pressure

Threads reduce contact area, O-ring gives positive sealing

With lack of precise manufacturing process the piston was prone to leakage

INFERENCE

Piston with two grooves was the best design which avoided leakage. It also has simple

construction and does not need precise machining; hence piston with two groove design is

selected.

Page 28 of 42

Page 29: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

I. JOINT USED

Currently the market trend is to make the product such that it won’t be possible to open the

assembly and repair or get the mechanism behind the joints. As the product is in the design

phase we assumed the threaded joints to be most appropriate for the primary design.

Figure 18: Threaded joint used

a) ANSYS REPORT FOR HEAD HEX

Figure 19: ANSYS results for head hex

i. INFERENCE

Type Equivalent (von- Maximum Maximum Shear Total

Page 29 of 42

Page 30: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Mises) Stress Principal Stress Stress Deformation

Minimum 6.5967e-007 MPa -1.2119 MPa 3.5209e-007 MPa 0. mm

Maximum 2.8344 MPa 4.7225 MPa 1.4901 MPa 4.9975e-005 mm

Table 8: Stresses on head hex by ANSYS

With reference to allowable stress on brass (50 MPa), the maximum stress developed in

cylinder (4.7225 MPa) from ANSYS, the cylinder is safe.

b) ANSYS REPORT FOR END HEX

Figure 20: ANSYS results for end hex

i. INFERENCE

TypeEquivalent (von-

Mises) Stress

Maximum

Principal Stress

Maximum Shear

Stress

Total

Deformation

Minimum 1.1977e-005 MPa -1.4534 MPa 6.8174e-006 MPa 0. mm

Page 30 of 42

Page 31: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Maximu

m2.345 MPa 1.8894 MPa 1.3525 MPa 4.727e-005 mm

Table 9: Stresses on end hex by ANSYS

With reference to allowable stress on brass (50 MPa), the maximum stress developed in

cylinder (2.345 MPa) from ANSYS, the cylinder is safe.

J. ‘O’ RING

a) INTRODUCTION

An O-ring seal is used to prevent the loss of a fluid or gas. The seal assembly consists of an

elastomer O-ring and a gland. An O-ring is a circular cross-section ring moulded from rubber.

Figure 21: Basic O-Ring

Figure 22: Gland and O-Ring Seal

VARIOUS STAGES O-RING UNDER APPLICATION OF MECHANICAL PRESSURE

STAGE I- PRESSURE APPLIED

Figure 23: O-Ring under pressure

STAGE II – PRESSURE LIMIT REACHED

Page 31 of 42

Page 32: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Figure 24: O-Ring Extruding

STAGE III – EXTRUSION FAILURE

Figure 25: O-Ring Under Extrusion Failure

i. COMMON MODES OF FAILURE

a) abrasion

b) compression set

c) chemical degradation

d) explosive decompression

e) extrusion

f) installation damage

g) outgassing / extraction

h) overcompression

i) plasma degradation

j) spiral failure

k) thermal degradation

ii. O-RING FAILURE ANALYSIS

From the end-user’s point of view, a seal can fail in three (3) general ways:

Leaking

Contamination

Change in Appearance

Contributing factors to seal failure in the sealing environment include:

Chemical— the type of chemical(s) in service

Page 32 of 42

Page 33: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Thermal— the operating ranges of the seal (also any thermal cycling)

Pressure/Vacuum— the range of pressures or vacuum levels in the process

Figure 26: O-Ring

K. PREDICTING SEAL FRICTION

Friction and Wear

O-rings load a sealing surface due to their own resilience compounded with any system

pressure. When the surface to be sealed moves relative to the O-ring, frictional forces are set

up, producing two effects: one leads to wear and the other reduces the useful load which a

cylinder can transmit.

In dynamic applications difference must be made between break-out and running friction.

Break-out friction must be overcome at the beginning of movement and also is known as start-

up friction. Once movement is established the frictional forces drop to a lower level and gliding

begins. This can be clearly seen in reciprocating cylinders.

Calculation Method from Literature

A commonly accepted method of predicting coulomb friction between a seal and a piston rod

includes the use of curves that isolate the friction due to seal squeeze and the friction due to

pressure. The friction value is given by the following sum:

F = FC + FH

Parameter Value DescriptionFc fc x Lf Total friction force due to seal squeeze

FH fh x Ar Total friction force due to pressure

fC Given in fig: Friction (lb per inch seal contact length)

Page 33 of 42

Page 34: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

fh Given in fig: Friction (lb per sq. inch seal projected area)

Lf π x Piston OD Piston circumference

Ar π/4 x ((Gland ID)2-(Rod OD)2) Seal projected areaTable 10: Important parameters for friction determination

The friction per inch length (fc) of the seal due to seal squeeze is given in Figure 65 & Figure

66 gives the friction per square inch of the seal projected area (fh) due to cylinder pressure.

Graphs shown below are taken for required surface roughness (200µm).

Figure 27:Friction due to O-ring compression

Figure 28: Friction due to fluid pressure

Measured Parameters Calculated Parameters Chart ValuesParameters Value Parameters Value Parameters Value

Seal Thickness (in) 0.0709 Arq (in2) 0.0514fc(lb/in2) 0.184

Cylinder ID (in) 0.394 Seal Squeeze (%) 3Piston Rod ID (in) 0.256 Ar2 (in2) 0.0727

fh(lb/in2) 3.623Seal Shore A Hardness 70

Table 11: Determined values for friction determination

fc(N/mm2) fh(N/mm2) Ar1(mm2) Ar2(mm2)0.0323 0.025 33.161 46.935

Table 12: Values from graph

Page 34 of 42

Page 35: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Cylinder ID in mm

Pre

ssur

e F

orce

(Fp)

in N

& F

rictio

n F

orce

(Fc)

in N

Pressure Force (Fp), Friction Force (Fc) Vs Diameter

Pressure Force (Fp)Friction Force (Fc)

Figure 29:Variation in Pressure Force (Fp), Friction Force (Fc) with Cylinder ID

For Dp=8mm For Dp=10mm

Total Frictional Force (F1) 1.641 N Total Frictional Force (F2) 2.1884 N

Pressure Force (Fp1) 2.513 N Pressure Force (Fp2) 3.927 N

Avail. Force (Fp1 - F1) 0.872 N Avail. Force (Fp2 – F2) 1.7386 NTable 13: Total available force for piston movement

INFERENCE

From the above table we can see that to give the deflection at 0.5 bar pressure 10mm diameter cylinder has more force value as compared to 8mm cylinder, hence the 10mm cylinder is finalised.

Page 35 of 42

Page 36: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

L. MEASUREMENT OF LINEAR DISPLACEMENT

a) LINEAR POTENTIOMETER

Figure 30: Principal of linear potentiometer

b) LINEAR VARIABLE DIFFERENTIAL TRANSFORMER (LVDT)

Figure 31: Principal of LVDT

c) BONDED RESISTANCE STRAIN GAUGE

Figure 32: Bonded resistance strain gauge

d) VARIABLE AREA CAPACITORS

Figure 33: Variable area capacitors

INFERENCE

From the different possible linear displacement measurement methods, the linear potentiometer is selected because of its ease of application.

Page 36 of 42

Page 37: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

M. TESTING OF THE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER

a) PRESSURE TRANSDUCER TESTS:1. Calibration test

2. Over load test

3. Endurance Test of Fluctuating pr. Test

4. Flick test

b) TEST RIG:

Figure 34: Test rig suggested

The test rig consists of a rotary type piston cylinder type manual pump which is required for

applying continuous pressure on the pressure transducer. A fixture is for holding a pressure

gauge to get reading, holder for holding pressure transducer and a fixed scale to get the

deflection readings. It also has an exit valve to release the pressure and one opening for getting

pressurized oil from the pump. A sink basin is provided for storing the oil at the bottom.

c) ERRORS IN THE PRESSURE GAUGES Zero error

Span Error

Angularity error (non-linearity)

Hysteresis error

Backlash error

Page 37 of 42

Page 38: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

d) OBSERVATION SET 1:

Specifications:

Cylinder: 8mm (ID), M.S.

Spring: Spring Steel (Dm=5.8mm, pitch=3mm, Nt=15, d=0.8mm, Free Length=42mm)

‘O’ Ring: 5*1.6, Silicon

Graph:

0 1 2 3 4 5 6-5

0

5

10

15

20

Pressure in Bar

Dis

plac

emen

t in

mm

Pressure Vs Displacement curve

UPPER LIMITLOWER LIMITIDEALLOADINGUNLOADING

Figure 35: Pressure Vs Displacement Graph for 8mm ID cylinder

e) OBSERVATION SET 2:

Specifications:

Cylinder: 10mm (ID), Brass

Spring: Spring Steel (Dm=8mm, pitch=4.5mm, Nt=10, d=1mm, Free Length=40.5mm)

‘O’ Ring: 6.5*1.8, Silicon

Page 38 of 42

Page 39: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Graph:

0 1 2 3 4 5 6-5

0

5

10

15

20

Pressure in Bar

Dis

plac

emen

t in

mm

Pressure Vs Displacement curve

UPPER LIMITLOWER LIMITIDEALLOADINGUNLOADING

Figure 36: Pressure Vs Displacement Graph for 10mm ID cylinder

f) INFERENCE From the plotted results we can observe that the cylinder with diameter 10 mm works

better in the initial region of the graph and give deflection at about 0.5 bar compared to the

one with diameter 8 mm which gives deflection at about 0.75 bar.

The main reason behind this difference is the fact that the acting force is directly

proportional to the square of the diameter and the frictional force is directly proportional to

the diameter.

Page 39 of 42

Page 40: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

N. SWOT ANALYSIS

Page 40 of 42

STRENGTHS

Use of brass enhances the aesthetic appeal

Reliable testing methods adopted Due to elimination of diaphragm, life

of the product increases significantly

WEAKNESS

Advanced manufacturing processes are not used

Required accuracy (+/-5%) is not obtained

Vibration testing has not been carried out due to lack of the necessary testing apparatus

OPPORTUNITY

If manufacturing capabilities are improved , accuracy will improve significantly

Could be used for other low pressure range applications

If the same product is manufactured in plastics would prove to be economical

THREATS If the oil used is having SAE rating

greater than 30 then leakage failure is possible.

Page 41: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

8. CONCLUSIONThere is an increasing interest in reverse engineering of parts whose drawings (geometric,

material and manufacturing details) are not available, especially those required one-off or in a

few numbers, such as for replacement of broken and worn-out parts. It is facilitated by the

availability of technologies such as non-contact scanning, rapid tool manufacturing (using

rapid prototyping and rapid tooling methods) and process parameter optimisation through

simulation. This investigation focussed on integrating these technologies, to achieve a dramatic

reduction in manufacturing time and associated costs for one-off products compared to

conventional routes. This has been demonstrated by design of pressure transducer assembly

belonging to gen-set, which had no drawings or any other data related to its manufacturing.

9. REFERENCES Ingle, Kathryn A., Reverse Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994, p.1-35.

Puntambenkar, N.; Jablokow, A. & Sommer, H., A unified review of 3D model generation

for reverse engineering. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 1994, 7, 259-268.

Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited-Trainning Manual on Process Measuring

instruments- Course no. SA-C&I # 2.4

Material properties- The DuPont Oval Logo, DuPont., The miracles of science.

Diphragm design manual -Freudenberg and NOK Group

Parker O-Ring Handbook -ORD 5700

Principles of Pressure Measurement- Franklin L. Scamman, MD

CE319F - Elementary Mechanics of Fluids – Laboratory UT Austin

Macro sensors-Division of Howard A. Schaevitz Technologies, Inc. - Technical Bulletin

0103

Machine Design II- Prof. K.Gopinath & Prof. M.M.Mayuram

Machine Design- V. B. Bhandari

Page 41 of 42

Page 42: Reverse Engineering and Reengineering

Page 42 of 42