Upload
cynthia-bostick
View
219
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Return to Hubble: Servicing Mission 4
Dr. Frank SummersSpace Telescope Science Institute
April 2, 2009
2
A Space Telescope
3
4
Artist’s Illustration
WRONG
Photograph
CORRECT
5
Size of Earth
Size of Earth’s Atmosphere
6400 km
600 km above surface
Size of Hubble’s Orbit
100 km above surface
6
7
8
Some Hubble History
9
• 1946 – Space telescope proposed
• 1962 – National Academy of Sciences recommends
Lyman Spitzer
• 1976 – NASA & ESA collaborate• 1977 – Congress funds project• 1985 – Construction complete• 1986 – Challenger accident
10
• 1990 – Launch• 1993 – Servicing Mission 1• 1997 – Servicing Mission 2• 1997 – Mission extended
from 15 to 20 years• 1999 – Servicing Mission 3A• 2002 – Servicing Mission 3B• 2003 – Columbia accident• 2004 – No shuttle mission?• 2005 – Two gyro mode• 2006 – “One final house
call”• 2008 – Hardware delay
11
What Makes Hubble So Great?
12
• Clear View – located above blurring effects of atmosphere
13
• Serviceable – new instruments every few years keeps it current
14
• Public – Observers get only one year of exclusive access
15
• Professional – STScI provides excellent support to scientists
16
Houston, We Have a Problem
17
18
19
20
21
22
Hubble Servicing Missions
23
Servicing Mission 1 – December 1993
• COSTAR, WFPC2
• solar arrays, gyros
24
Servicing Mission 2 – February 1997
• NICMOS, STIS
• fine guidance sensor, solid state recorder, reaction wheel assembly
25
Servicing Mission 3A – December 1999
• gyroscope failure in November
• computer, data recorder, fine guidance sensor, electronics improvement, thermal protection
26
Servicing Mission 3B – March 2002
• ACS
• solar arrays, NICMOS cooling system, reaction wheel assembly, power control unit
27
Servicing Mission 4 – May 2009
• WFC3, COS
• ACS repair, STIS repair, gyros, batteries, fine guidance sensor, thermal blanket, de-orbit module
28
Servicing Mission 4 – May 2009
• WFC3, COS
• ACS repair, STIS repair, gyros, batteries, fine guidance sensor, thermal blanket, de-orbit module
29
30
1990
31
1993
32
1997
33
2002
34
2009
35
Hubble, We Have an Anomaly
36
37
38
SM4: An Ambitious Workload
39
SM4: An Ambitious Workload
“This final mission will be, without doubt, the most complicated and challenging that NASA has ever mounted.”
40
Major Goals for SM4
1 Enhance Hubble’s scientific capabilities with a new camera and new spectrograph• WFC3, a panchromatic camera, replacing WFPC2
• COS, a very efficient spectrograph, replacing COSTAR
2 Restore existing Hubble capability through in-situ repair• STIS: repair failed electronics
• ACS: repair failed electronics
3 Upgrade Hubble to last to beyond 2014• Install refurbished Fine Guidance Sensor
• Install 6 new gyros
• Install 6 new batteries
• Install thermal protection covers
• Install Capture Mechanism for de-orbit mission
If successful, HST will be at the height of its power,
with 6 working, complementary, science instruments
41
NOTE: Now that SM4 is officially manifested and a crew has been assigned, the EVA timeline is controlled by the Space Shuttle Program.
42
Wide Field Camera 3
– WFC3…
43
Wide Field Camera 3
• WFC3 has two wide field cameras– near ultraviolet and optical imaging
(UVIS)– near infrared imaging camera (IR)
• First truly panchromatic camera• Improves on ACS & NICMOS
– UVIS >30x discovery power of ACS/WFPC2– IR 15-20x discovery power of NICMOS
44
Camera Comparison
45
Cosmic Origins Spectrograph
47
Cosmic Origins Spectrograph
• COS optimized for ultraviolet observations• Far Ultraviolet Channel
– 1-reflection, aberration-corrected along dispersion– 2 side-by-side 16k by 1k pixel detector (FUSE design)– Records arrival time of every detected photon– 3 gratings; 300 or 800 (nm) spectral range– Resolving power ~3000, ~20,000 [115 to 205 nm]
• Near Ultraviolet Channel– Fully corrected optical design– 1k by 1k pixel detector (STIS design)– Records arrival time of every detected photon– 4 gratings– 10 to 80 nanometers spectral ranges– Resolving power ~2000, ~20,000 [170 to 320 nm]
48
COS vs STIS
Limiting Flux for S/N=10 in 3600 sec (R~10,000 (0.15 Ǻ) binning)
-15.5
-15.0
-14.5
-14.0
-13.5
-13.0
-12.5
1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
Wavelength (Ǻ)
log
Flu
x (
erg
cm
-2 s
ec-1
Ǻ-1)
STIS E140MR=45,000
STIS G140MR~11,000-17,000
COS G130MR~20,000-24,000
COS G160MR~20,000-24,000
49
ACS Repair
• Advanced Camera for Surveys• ACS failure in January 2007• Cut through a grill• Similar to WFC3, but …
50
STIS Repair
• Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph
• STIS failure in August 2002• > 100 fasteners• Similar to COS, but …
51
Gyros
• 3 gyros operating is nominal• 2 gyro mode since 2005• 3 failed, 2 operating, 1 spare
52
Gyros installed in SM3A
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6
RR
RR
Solid blue = run tim e @ SM3BSlant blue = run tim e @ 9/17/07Red = run tim e @ pre-SM3B failureSlant red = run tim e @ pos t-SM3B failureRR = rotor res triction failure
Gyros in HST at completion of SM1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6
Ru
n-t
ime
in
Ye
ars
FL
FL
FL
FL
Solid blue = run tim e @ SM2Slant blue = run tim e @ SM3ARed = run tim e @ failureFL = flex lead failure
50% failure probability
75% failure probability
95% failure probability
ON
OFF
FL
ON
G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6
53
Batteries
• Hubble can not point without batteries
• About 100,000 charge-discharge cycles
54
55
56
Bay 8 Thermal Situation
BAY9
BAY8
SM3B Survey
57
Bay 8 Thermal Situation•Patched during SM2, however expected to
be completely degraded
PATCHBAY 7 BAY 8
58
Bay 8 Thermal Situation
59
• Possible severe scheduling impacts
Possible Bay 8 Impacts
60
SM4 Preparations
61
62
HFMS Fit Check
63
HFMS Fit Check
64
ASIPE Fit Check
65
66
67
68
HST equipment at KSC
69
May 12, 2009
70
71