55
RETURN PATH OPTIMIZATION Kevin Seaner Aurora Networks [email protected]

Return Path Optimization

  • Upload
    barto

  • View
    53

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Return Path Optimization. Kevin Seaner Aurora Networks [email protected]. Return Path Familiarization & Node Return Laser Setup. CATV Network Overview Coaxial Network (RF Distribution) Unity Gain Input Levels to Actives Fiber Network (Laser/Node/Receiver) NPR Return Laser Setup - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Return Path Optimization

RETURN PATH OPTIMIZATION

Kevin Seaner

Aurora Networks

[email protected]

Page 2: Return Path Optimization

Return Path Familiarization & Node Return Laser Setup

CATV Network Overview Coaxial Network (RF Distribution)

Unity GainInput Levels to Actives

Fiber Network (Laser/Node/Receiver)NPRReturn Laser Setup

Headend Distribution NetworkReturn Receiver SetupCombining Losses

The X Level Network Troubleshooting

Page 3: Return Path Optimization

Typical Two-Way HFC CATV System?

Downstream (Forward)

Upstream (Return)

Network appears to be two one-way systems

Page 4: Return Path Optimization

With DOCSIS deployed in our Networks the system looks and functions more like a loop!

Changes in the INPUT to the CMTS

cause changes tobe made to the

output levels of themodems

DOCSIS ALC

Page 5: Return Path Optimization

Divide and Conquer the Return Path!

Page 6: Return Path Optimization

RF Network

Forward Path

Output of Node RX to TV, STB, or Modem

Return Path

Output of Set Top or Modem to Input of Node

Unity Gain

Forward Path

Return Path

Page 7: Return Path Optimization

Forward Path Unity Gain

Unity gain in the downstream path exists when the amplifier’s station gain equals the loss of the cable and passives before it.

In this example, the gain of each downstream amplifier is 32 dB. The 750 MHz losses preceding each amplifier should be 32 dB as well.

For example, the 22 dB loss between the first and second amplifier is all due to the cable itself, so the second amplifier has a 0 dB input attenuator. Given the +14 dBmV input and +46 dBmV output, you can see the amplifier’s 32 dB station gain equals the loss of the cable preceding it.

The third amplifier (far right) is fed by a span that has 24 dB of loss in the cable and another 2 dB of passive loss in the directional coupler, for a total loss of 26 dB. In order for the total loss to equal the amplifier’s 32 dB of gain, it is necessary to install a 6 dB input attenuator at the third amplifier.

In the downstream plant, the unity gain reference point is the amplifier output.

Page 8: Return Path Optimization

Why should the inputs to each active be +20 dBmV??

SYSTEM /DESIGN SPECIFICDoes not matter on Manufacturer’s

equipment!

Unity gain in the upstream path exists when the amplifier’s station gain equals the loss of the cable and passives upstream from that location.

In this example, the gain of each reverse amplifier is 19.5 dB. The 30 MHz losses following each amplifier should be approximately 19.5 dB as well.

In the upstream plant, the unity gain reference point is the amplifier input.

Set by REVERSE SWEEP!

Reverse Path Unity Gain

Page 9: Return Path Optimization

Telemetry Injection

Injections levels may vary due to test point insertion loss differences from various types of equipment.

The PORT Design level is the important Level to remember!

The Port Design level determines the Modem TX Level

-20 dB Forward Test Point -30 dB Forward Test Point

Page 10: Return Path Optimization

CATV Return Distribution Network Design -Modem TX Levels

• The telemetry amplitude is used to establish the modem transmit level.• The modem transmit levels should be engineered in the RF design.• There is no CORRECT answer. IT is SYSTEM SPECIFIC.• Unity gain must be setup from the last amplifier’s return input to the

input of the node port. The same level what ever is chosen or designedinto the system!

26 23 20 17 14 8

Amplifier upstream input:

125 ft 125 ft 125 ft 125 ft 125 ft

0.5 dB 0.5 dB 0.5 dB 0.5 dB 0.5 dB

0.6 dB 0.8 dB 1.2 dB 1.3 dB 1.9 dB

125

ft +

spl

itte r

125

f t +

spl

itte r

125

f t +

4 w

ay s

plitt

er

125

f t +

spl

itte r

125

f t +

4 w

ay s

p lit t

er

125

f t +

spl

itte r

5 dB

5 dB

10 d

B

5 dB

10 d

B

5 dB

Feeder cable: 0.500 PIII, 0.4 dB/100 ftDrop cable: 6-series, 1.22 dB/100 ftValues shown are at 30 MHz

Modem TX: +49 dBmV +47.1 dBmV +50.4 dBmV +44.1 dBmV +47.9 dBmV +39.3 dBmV

+18 dBmV

+51dBmV +49.1 dBmV +52.4 dBmV +46.1 dBmV +49.9 dBmV +41.3 dBmV

+20 dBmV

+47dBmV +45.1 dBmV +48.4 dBmV +42.1 dBmV +45.9 dBmV +37.3 dBmV

+16 dBmV

Page 11: Return Path Optimization

Reverse Sweep

Must use consistent port design levels for the return path. Sets Modem TX Levels Sets the X Level for the network!

Telemetry levels may vary due to insertion losses of test points May vary from LE to MB to Node! – PORT LEVEL IS THE KEY!

Must use a good reference Must pad the return path to match the forward path when

internal splitters are used in actives prior to the diplex filters!

Page 12: Return Path Optimization

Internal Splitters

An Internal Splitter afterthe Diplex Filter effectthe forward and return

levels!

Page 13: Return Path Optimization

Internal Splitter Prior to Diplex FilterAn Internal Splitter beforethe Diplex Filter effects only

the forward levels! The returnlevels need to be attenuated

the same as the forward!

Page 14: Return Path Optimization

Internal Splitter Prior to Diplex Filter

An Internal Splitter beforethe Diplex Filter effects only

the forward levels! The returnlevels need to be attenuated

the same as the forward!

Page 15: Return Path Optimization

SO FAR SO GOOD?

ANY QUESTIONS?

Page 16: Return Path Optimization

Return Path Optical Transport

• Begins at the INPUT to the Node• Ends at the OUTPUT of the

return receiver• Can have the greatest effect on

the SNR (MER) of the return path• Most misunderstood and

incorrectly setup portion of the return path

• Must be OPTIMIZED for the current or future channel load.

Is not part of the unity gain of the return path

Must be treated separately and specifically.

Setup Return Laser/Node Specific

Requires cooperation between Field and Headend Personnel

Page 17: Return Path Optimization

3 Steps to Setting up the Return Path Optical Transport

1. Have Vendor Determine the Return Path Transmitter “Setup Window” for each node or return laser type in your system

• Must use same setup for all common nodes/transmitters

2. Set the input level to the Return Transmitter• Set levels using telemetry and recommended attenuation

to the transmitter• Understand NPR

3. Return Receiver Setup – It is an INTEGRAL part of the link!

• Using the injected telemetry signal ensure the return receiver is “optimized”

Page 18: Return Path Optimization

Setting the Transmitter “Window”

In general, RF input levels into a return laser determine the CNR of the return path.

Higher input – better CNRLower input – worse CNR

Too much level and the laser ‘clips’. Too little level and the noise

performance is inadequate Must find a balance, or, “set the

window” the return laser must operate in

Not only with one carrier but all the energy that in in the return path.

The return laser does not see only one or two carriers it ‘sees’ the all of the energy (carriers, noise, ingress, etc.) that in on the return path that is sent to it.

Page 19: Return Path Optimization

What is NPR?

NPR = Noise Power Ratio NPR is a means of easily characterizing an optical

link’s linearity and noise contribution NPR and CNR are related; not the same…but close NPR is measured by a test setup as demonstrated

below.

Page 20: Return Path Optimization

Noise Power Ratio (NPR)

Plot the ratio of signal to noise plus intermodulation (S/{N+I}) versus input level.

Dynamic range at a given signal to noise plus intermodulation (S/{N+I}) defines the immunity to ingress.

Page 21: Return Path Optimization

5 40

Frequency, MHz

A

B

Plot 10 Log(A/B) vs. Input Level

Noise-In-The-Slot Measurement Test Signal

Page 22: Return Path Optimization

BroadbandNoise

G enerator

5 - 40 MHzBandpass

Filter

DeviceUnderT est

BandpassFilter

SpectrumAnalyser

22.5 MHzNotchFilter

5 M Hz 40 M Hz

Input Signal

NPR

5 M Hz 40 M Hz5 M Hz 40 M Hz

Noise-In-the-Slot Measurement Method

Page 23: Return Path Optimization

Noise-In-The-Slot Measurement

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

-90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40

S/(

N+

I),

dB

RF Input Level, dBmV/Hz

Dynamic Range = 15 dB

Page 24: Return Path Optimization

Setting the Return Level

Data (Noise) Loading: Best to use dBmV/Hz

Discrete Carrier Loading: Best to use dBmV/carrier

Page 25: Return Path Optimization

Watch Out For…

Forward to return isolation: Forward channels on the return

Measuring levels: Return is burst digital modulation; average level is much lower

than peak level

Page 26: Return Path Optimization

Transmitter Technologies (1)

Fabry-Perot Laser: Low cost High noise (poor Relative Intensity Noise - RIN) Higher noise when unmodulated Modest temperature stability Supports up to 16 QAM modulation

Page 27: Return Path Optimization

Transmitter Technologies (2)

Uncooled DFB Laser: Higher cost Lower noise (better RIN) Modest temperature stability Supports up to 64 QAM modulation

Page 28: Return Path Optimization

Transmitter Technologies (3)

Cooled DFB Laser: High cost Lowest noise (best RIN) Good temperature stability Supports up to 64 QAM modulation

Page 29: Return Path Optimization

Transmitter Technologies (4)

Digital Return Laser: High cost Much less susceptible to optical distortions Best temperature stability Supports up to 4096 QAM modulation

Page 30: Return Path Optimization

Transmitter Technologies (4)

Analog Lower cost Simpler technology.

Digital: Highest cost Performance is constant for wide range of optical link budgets Easy to set up

Page 31: Return Path Optimization

Digital transmitter technology

Page 32: Return Path Optimization

DFB NPR Curves

Standard DFB TX Noise Power Ratio (NPR) Performance

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

-70 -65 -60 -55 -50 -45 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15

Input Power per Hz (dBmV/Hz)

NP

R (

dB

)

Room Temp

- 40 F

+ 140 F

41 dB SNR

Linear Response

Non-Linear Response (Clipping)

Dynamic Range

8.5 dB

Page 33: Return Path Optimization

Typical Digital Return NPR Curve

41 dB SNR

Dynamic Range

-68 dBmV/Hz for 37 MHz bandwidth is +8 dBm total power

15 dB

Page 34: Return Path Optimization

What’s the Big Deal with NPR?

HSD

VOD

Business Services

VOIP

Page 35: Return Path Optimization

What’s the Big Deal with NPR?

Why do we have to reset our Return Transmitter Input Levels?

Changes in the signals and number of signals in the return path.10 years ago we possibly had one FSK and

maybe one QPSK carrier in the return pathToday we may have as many as four 64-

QAM carriers, and two 16-QAM carriers in the return pathNeed to ensure we are not clipping our

return transmitters in the node. Why do the number of channels matter? What’s the difference between QPSK and

16-QAM?

Page 36: Return Path Optimization

Per Carrier Power vs. Composite Power

21dBmv

21dBmv

Power into Transmitter: 21 dBmV

CW Carrier

Power into Transmitter: 24 dBmV

CW Carrier

Page 37: Return Path Optimization

Per Carrier Power vs. Composite Power

21dBmv

Power into Transmitter: 24 dBmV

CW Carrier

21dBmv

Power into Transmitter: 27 dBmV

CW Carrier

Page 38: Return Path Optimization

Per Carrier Power vs. Composite Power

As you add more carriers to the return path the composite power to the laser increases.To maintain a specific amount of composite power into the transmitter the per-carrier power must be reduced.When channel bandwidth is changed, the channel’s power changes.

For instance, if a 3.2 MHz-wide signal is changed to 6.4 MHz bandwidth, the channel has 3 dB more power even though the “haystack” appears to be the same height on a spectrum analyzer!

Page 39: Return Path Optimization

Changing Modulation Type – Wider Channel

21dBmv

Power into Transmitter: 24 dBmV

CW Carrier

Power into Transmitter: 34 dBmV3.2 MHz

Channel BW

21dBmv

Note: This example assumes test equipment set to 300 kHz RBW

Page 40: Return Path Optimization

But the Levels Look Different

This is why we cannot use the eMTA to check levels Your meter will read out low! Apparent amplitude will depend

upon the instrument’s resolution bandwidth (IF bandwidth). Must use the Telemetry for SETUP!

Page 41: Return Path Optimization

Different Modulation Techniques Require Different SNR (MER)

HSD16-QAM / 64-QAM (and

beyond) STB (VOD)

QPSK Telemetry

FSK Business Services

QPSK to 16-QAM

Modulation Type Required CNRRequired CNR for various modulation

schemes to achieve 1.0E-8 (1x10-8) BER BPSK: 12 dB QPSK: 15 dB 16-QAM: 22 dB 64-QAM: 28 dB 256-QAM: 32 dB

Multiple services on the return path with different types of modulation schemes will require allocation of bandwidth and amplitudes.

Can be engineered.Requires differential padding in Headend

Page 42: Return Path Optimization

BER vs NPR

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50

1.0E-08

1.0E-07

1.0E-06

1.0E-05

1.0E-04

20

30

40

50

DFB Tx - 16QAM & 64QAM BER (Pre-FEC)Full Load = (1) 3.2 MHz 16QAM, (3) 6.4 MHz 64QAM, (1) 6 MHz 64QAM Annex C)

DFB Tx (1310nm 2 dBm), 17 km glass, 7 dB total link loss, thru PII HDRxR2-26-08

64QAM, Full Load

16QAM, Full Load

NPR, 5-40 MHz

DFB Transmitter Composite Input Level - (dBmV)

BE

R

NP

R (

dB

)

34 dB BER dynamic range(16 QAM, @ 1E-6)

Page 43: Return Path Optimization

Why do we care about the drive level to the return transmitter?

The laser performance is determined by the composite energy of all the carriers, AND CRAP in the return path.

What is return path CRAP? Can it make a difference in return

path performance? How does it effect system

performance? How can you increase your

Carrier-to-Crap Ratio (CTC)?

Page 44: Return Path Optimization

Energy in the Return PathWhat does your return path look like?The return laser ‘sees’ all the energy in the return path.

The energy is the sum of all the RF power of the carriers, noise, ingress, etc., in the spectrum from about 1 MHz to 42 MHzThe more RF power that is put into the laser the closer you are to clipping the laser.A clean return path allows you to operate your system more effectively.The type of return laser you use has an associated window of operation

Page 45: Return Path Optimization

Ingress Changes over Time

Node x InstantLooks Pretty Good

Node x OvernightOh, no!

Page 46: Return Path Optimization

Return Laser Performance Summary

What Affects Return Path Laser Performance?

oNumber of Carriers

oCarrier Amplitude

oModulation Scheme

oIngress

Will Laser Performance Change over Temperature?

At what temperature should you setup your optical return path transport?

Always follow your manufacture’s setup procedure for the return laser input level!

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

-70 -65 -60 -55 -50 -45 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20

Input Power per Hz (dBmV/Hz)

NP

R (

dB

)

Room Temp

- 40 F

+ 140 F

Standard DFB TX Noise Power Ratio (NPR) Performance

Page 47: Return Path Optimization

Headend Distribution Network

Begins at the OUTPUT of the optical return path receiver(s)

Ends at the Application Devices

CMTS, DNCS, DAC, etc.

Page 48: Return Path Optimization

Return Path Headend RF Combining

Page 49: Return Path Optimization

Headend Optical Return RX Setup

OPTICAL INPUT POWER Too much optical power can cause intermodulation (clipping) in the

receiverFollow vendor recommendations for optical input levels; most analog return receivers have a sweet spot range for optimal performance.Use optical attenuators on extremely short paths or where too much optical power exists into a receiver

Too little optical power can cause CNR problems with that return path, even if the node’s transmitter is optimized.

If combined with other return receiver outputs can create noise issues on more paths

For BEST RECEIVER PERFORMANCE, DO NOT optically attenuate optical receivers to the lowest level in the headend (farthest node).

Find the level with which you get the best noise performance out of the receiver.

Most analog receivers have a sweet spot somewhere in the range of -9 dBm to -6 dBm, but your receiver vendor should recommend!

Page 50: Return Path Optimization

Headend Optical Return RX SetupRF OUTPUT LEVELS On analog transmitter returns from the node

The less optical power into a receiver the less RF you will have on the output.2:1 ratio. For every 1 dB of optical change there is 2 dB of RF (inverse square law)

On Digital transmitter returns from the nodeOptical input power to the receiver has no effect on the RF you will have on the output. RF is created in the D-to-A decoder in the Receiver.

The RF levels on the output of the return receivers should be set PRIMARILY with external RF attenuation between the Return RX and the first RF splitter.

Page 51: Return Path Optimization

Example – Analog Return Path Receiver

Page 52: Return Path Optimization

Return RX Setup

Rules of Thumb (company specific):Do not optically attenuate the return path so all the optical inputs are the same as the lowest.The lower the optical input power, the lower the CNR of the receiver.Attenuate RF externally to the device

Must have enough level so that the CMTS or other devices receiving the signals from the return path operate acceptably.

There can be excessive passive loss from the output of the optical receiver to the terminating device. 8-way splitter/combiner – 10.2 dB typical 4-way splitter/combiner – 6.8 dB typicalTypical input into terminating device. CMTS: 0 dBmV DNCS: -3 to +27 dBmV

Page 53: Return Path Optimization

Return Path Headend RF Combining

The RF pad at the node TX sets the PERFORMANCE!

The RF pads at the HE or Hub set the LEVEL!

Page 54: Return Path Optimization

Conclusions Return system is a loop Changes anywhere in the loop can

effect the performance of the network

Once the return laser is setup DON’T TOUCH IT

Changing the drive levels can affect the window of operation of the laser

Work as a team to diagnose system problems

XOCMarket Health, Scout, Score Card,

Watchtower

Avoid performing node setups during extremes in outdoor temperatures

Page 55: Return Path Optimization

Questions