RESULTS BASED MANAGEMENT FOUNDANTIONAL SEMINAR

Prague,April 14 – 16, 2014

Daniel Braun, 1st Deputy Minister of Regional Development

Opening speech

Day 1, April 14th 2014, Prague

RESULTS BASED MANAGEMENT FOUNDANTIONAL SEMINAR

Technicalities and organisational information

WELCOME AND THANK YOU FOR COMING!

First of all…

About the sponsors

• This seminar is co-funded by (1) the EC and Flemish ESF Agency through the COP RBM project and (2) Czech Operational Programme Technical Assistance.

• Together the sponsors care for your needs:

BASIC

SOCIAL

As for the basic needs

There is water, tea, coffee and snacks at your disposal at any time.

Lunch will always take place here. We will leave for dinner after the end of

today‘s programme.

To ease our work in fulfilling you basic needs… Please sign the list of participant every

morning . And if you are coming to the dinner event

today, make your signutare twice and sign also the list of participants for dinner event.

Introduction and objectives of the seminar

Tour de table

• As we will spend three days togethet, let‘s indroduce ourselves.

• Please, tell us your name, the organization you come from and your expectations about this seminar.

9

Objectives of the seminar

• Provide a variety of perspectives regarding managing for results in the context of ESIF interventions and beyond.

• Provide opportunities to discuss challenges, pitfalls and practice with your peers.

• Help you get a good idea of areas where you can take initiatives to further strengthen your results orientation.

• Create a common language concerning RBM.• Inspire and rise questions.• See your reactions.

10

NOT objectives…

• Proclaim any best (or even good) practices• Winning (nor losing) arguments• Having no fun whatsoever (humor is allowed)

11

The broadest picture

• Let‘s start with the very quick tour through the development of public administration thinking in the last decades.

12

13

Problem: Perceived lack of•Performance•Responsibility•Accountability•Transparency•Control•Policy capacity to guarantee results

New problem

•Dysfunctional authonomy•Centrifugal agencies•Suboptimal focus on agency outputs, not on policy outcomes

•Considerable transaction costs•"Silos" - disconnected single policy capacities

•Perverse effects of Performance Measurement Systems (Gaming, Parking, Creaming)

Another new problem

•Hierarchical coordination mechanisms lead to pure recentralization

•Market based coordination leads to private monopolies

•Network based coordination mechanisms lead to only symbolic policies and weak networks

•Audit tsunami•New performance approaches triggered Red Tape

•Rise of deep distrust within the public sector

Comming problems

• ?

Solution

• Creation of agencies• More authonomy• More specialisation• Increase of single policy

capacity• Performance

Mesurement Systems introduced

New solution

• Reinvent coordination (or inroduce brand new):• Hierarchy mechanisms• Market mechanisms• Network mechanisms

• Gurantee effective policy capacity

• Increase of Audit capacity

Another new solution?

• Re-establish Trust (especially WITHIN the public sector)

• Re-equilibrate Trust and Performance

• Performance governance approach

• New synthesis for public administration approach

• Results Based Management Plus System

Weberian bureacracy New Public Management Discussion after the NPM

14

Problem: Perceived lack of•Performance•Responsibility•Accountability•Transparency•Control•Policy capacity to guarantee results

New problem

•Dysfunctional authonomy•Centrifugal agencies•Suboptimal focus on agency outputs, not on policy outcomes

•Considerable transaction costs•"Silos" - disconnected single policy capacities

•Perverse effects of Performance Measurement Systems (Gaming, Parking, Creaming)

Another new problem

•Hierarchical coordination mechanisms lead to pure recentralization

•Market based coordination leads to private monopolies

•Network based coordination mechanisms lead to only symbolic policies and weak networks

•Audit tsunami•New performance approaches triggered Red Tape

•Rise of deep distrust within the public sector

Comming problems

• ?

Solution

• Creation of agencies• More authonomy• More specialisation• Increase of single policy

capacity• Performance

Mesurement Systems introduced

New solution

• Reinvent coordination (or inroduce brand new):• Hierarchy mechanisms• Market mechanisms• Network mechanisms

• Gurantee effective policy capacity

• Increase of Audit capacity

Another new solution?

• Re-establish Trust (especially WITHIN the public sector)

• Re-equilibrate Trust and Performance

• Performance governance approach

• New synthesis for public administration approach

• Results Based Management Plus System

Weberian bureacracy New Public Management Discussion after the NPM

Focus of the current ESIF

setup

Focus of the COP RBM

Possible benefits from the seminar

We hope that with RBM • You can be frontrunners and progressive part of

the ESIF community.• You can expect some problems that are likely to

happen in 2014-2020 period and be prepared to tackle them with appropriate countermeasures.

15