1
Response time of a liquid crystal image transducer: errata Bernard W. Joseph and Aaron D. Gara General Motors Research Laboratories, Physics Depart- ment, Warren, Michigan 48090. B. W. Joseph is now with GM Proving Ground, Vehicle Emission Laboratory, Milford, Michigan 48042. Received 7 July 1978. 0003-6935/78/0901-2672$0.50/0. © 1978 Optical Society of America. The scale was omitted from Fig. 3 of this Letter. 1 It is re- produced correctly below: Fig. 3. Rise time of two Hughes image transducers as a function of normalized writing irradiance. The full and solid lines are the en- velopes of all measurements made on the two devices. Writing irra- diance was normalized by the input irradiance which produced saturation. Reference 1. B. W. Joseph and A. D. Gara, Appl. Opt. 17, 1987 (1978). 2672 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 17, No. 17 / 1 September 1978

Response time of a liquid crystal image transducer: errata

  • Upload
    aaron-d

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Response time of a liquid crystal image transducer: errata

Response time of a liquid crystal image transducer: errata

Bernard W. Joseph and Aaron D. Gara General Motors Research Laboratories, Physics Depart­ment, Warren, Michigan 48090. B. W. Joseph is now with GM Proving Ground, Vehicle Emission Laboratory, Milford, Michigan 48042. Received 7 July 1978. 0003-6935/78/0901-2672$0.50/0. © 1978 Optical Society of America.

The scale was omitted from Fig. 3 of this Letter.1 It is re­produced correctly below:

Fig. 3. Rise time of two Hughes image transducers as a function of normalized writing irradiance. The full and solid lines are the en­velopes of all measurements made on the two devices. Writing irra­

diance was normalized by the input irradiance which produced saturation.

Reference 1. B. W. Joseph and A. D. Gara, Appl. Opt. 17, 1987 (1978).

2672 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 17, No. 17 / 1 September 1978