16
Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP

Sharon MilnerMichaela Black

Greg Kelly14th Feb 2012

Page 2: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

2

Outline of Discussion

• Resources developed and rationale: – UMAP, ‘PDP at a Glance’, PDP website

• Links between PDP, GA, HEAR, KIS• Examples of practice and challenges

Page 3: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

3

‘PDP at a Glance’

Page 4: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

4

Page 5: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

GEL A Generic Tool for

Game Enhanced LearningMichaela BlackDave BustardMartin McKinneyAdrian MoorePeter Moffett – Placement Student

Page 6: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

6

Background

• Research from PhD student Therese Charles “Enhanced eLearning Engagement using

Game Absorption Techniques”

producing a Framework and 3 years positive results

• University funded placement for CIE to develop cost effective tool to easily implement framework

Page 7: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

7

GOLF: Game-Orientated Learning Framework

• SIX factors contributing to effective engagement in digital games

• FUN: engagement is easier if the experience is enjoyable• SOCIAL: engagement is reinforced by the social support of others

going through the same experience• IDENTITY: engagement can be encouraged if everyone has a

visible role in the learning environment• CHALLENGE: engagement can build on human competitive drive,

enhanced by social pressure• STRUCTURE: engagement is more likely if objectives and

constraints are clear and acceptable• FEEDBACK: engagement is reinforced by making achievement

explicit and timely

Page 8: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

8

GEL: Game Enhanced Learning Tool

• Simplifies the ‘gamification’ of a module• Web based system for staff and students• Supports Group or Individual games• Basic Steps:

– Create a course– Add a module

• Upload students to module from Banner

– Add a challenge to module with point allocation• Most basic game is attendance

– Record points– Students receive automatic feedback– Leaderboard creates competition

Page 9: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

9

Page 10: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

10

Page 11: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

11

Page 12: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

12

Page 13: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

13

Page 14: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

14

Page 15: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

15

Student Feedback: Gauges• Each challenge will have feedback in form of a

gauge

• Students can also view their own group members

• Staff can view groups or individual students

Page 16: Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP Sharon Milner Michaela Black Greg Kelly 14 th Feb 2012

16

COM135 Challenges

We

ek

1.

Att

en

da

nce

2.

As

sig

nm

en

t

3.

Tu

tori

al

Qu

iz

4.

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n

5.

Cla

ss

Tes

t

6.

Gro

up

D

yn

am

ics

7.

Pre

se

nta

tio

ns

8.

Re

vis

ion

Q

uiz

zes

9.

CV

1 1000 500 200

50

2 1000 500 200 3 1000 500 500 200 4 1000 500 200 5 1000 500 200 6 500 500 7 1000 500 200

50

1200

800

1000

8 250 500 100 9 1000 500 200 10 1000 500 200 11 12

Total (19050)

8750 500 4500 1700 500 100 1200 800 1000

Dynamic Structural Elements to Challenges