Upload
3s-media
View
225
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Resource Feb 2013 edition
Citation preview
ISSN
168
0-49
02 R
40.0
0 (in
cl V
AT)
• V
ol 1
5, N
o 1,
Feb
ruar
y 20
13
Promoting integrated resources management
BOITUMELONG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS
Expanding horizons
Recycling National Composting strategy on the cards
VlakfonteinA new
cutting-edge facility
Carbon taxIs treasury ready for
implementation?
Hazardous wasteComposting of
companion animal carcasses
The official journal of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa
Expert Opinion
is printed on 100% recycled paper
“We are in a very dynamic phase in respect of legislation regarding managing South Africa’s waste.” Leon Bredenhann, strategic advisor integrated waste management, Golder Associates Africa
Institute ofWaste Managementof Southern Africa
+27 (0) 33 346 1444 • [email protected] • www.talbot.co.za
Talbot Laboratories is a commercial environmental laboratory specialising in chemical and microbiologicalanalysis of water, wastewater and solid waste. The specialists in our waste division adhere to the latest
environmental waste legislation and trends. With over 10 years waste classi�cation experience,our laboratoryo�ers our clients de�nitive waste management solutions.
Puzzled by how to classify waste? Contact Talbot Laboratories.
Talbot Laboratories is a business division of Talbot & Talbot (Pty) Ltd.
NEM:WAYour Responsibility, Our Solution
C
M
Y
CM
MY
CY
CMY
K
tal10860_iwmsa_ad_a4_fa.pdf 1 2013/01/29 1:50 PM
Cover StoryBoitumelong Investment Holdings
Changing the South African waste
management landscape 6
RegularsPresident’s comment 3
IWMSA News 64
Hot seatGolder 8
Solid wasteSeeking out a national strategy on
the composting of organic waste 10
Tyre recycling plan ready to go after
several speed bumps 14
Solid waste management practices
in Western Africa 15
RecyclingTurning used oil into explosives
– recycling with a difference 20
LandfillsVlakfontein is the new futuristic
Class A landfill for Gauteng 25
The importance of GCL shear
strength in steep sloped landfills 29
Air pollution/CDMUnpacking SA’s coming carbon tax 32
Hazardous wasteMortality composting of companion
animals – novel and fresh 40
Health care waste Health care waste remains a global
challenge 47
Panel discussionThe A to Z of landfills and landfilling 49
WastewaterWastewater energy efficiency and
optimisation 56
ProfileLangkloof Bricks goes green,
gets gold 38
ISSN
168
0-49
02 R
40.0
0 (in
cl V
AT)
• V
ol 1
5, N
o 1,
Feb
ruar
y 20
13
Promoting integrated resources management
GGGBBOITUMMMMELOOOOOONNGGGGGG BBOITUUUUMMMMMELLLLOOOOOOOOONNGGGGGGSSSINNVESTMEEEEEENNNENT HOLOOLOLLDLDLDLLL INGGGGGGSSSINNVESTMEEEEENENNENT HOLOLOLLLDLLDLLL INGGGG
Expanding horizons
Recycling National Composting strategy on the cards
VlakfonteinA new
cutting-edge facility
Carbon taxIs treasury ready for
implementation?
Hazardous wasteComposting of
companion animal carcasses
02IS
SN 1
680-
490
is printed on 100% recycled paper
“We are in a very dynamic phase in respect of legislation regarding managing South Africa’s waste.” Leon Bredenhann, strategic advisor integrated waste management, Golder Associates Africa
Institute ofWaste Managementof Southern Africa
contentswww.3smedia.co.za ISSN 1680-4902, Volume 15, Number 1, February 2013
The RéSource team stands firmly behind environmental preservation. As such, RéSource magazine is printed on 100% recycled paper and uses no dyes or varnishes. The magazine is saddle-stitched to ensure that no glues are required in the binding process.
RéSource February 2013 – 1
in association with }
infrastructure news infrastructure4 www.infrastructurene.ws
10 Recycling
40 Hazardous waste
56 Wastewater
32 Carbon tax
RéSource offers advertisers an ideal platform to ensure maximum exposure of their brand. Companies are afforded the opportunity of publishing a cover story and a cover picture to promote their products and services to an appropri-ate audience. Please call Christine Pretorius on +27 (0)11 465 6273 to secure your booking. The article does not represent the views of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa, or those of the publisher.
RéSource February 2013 – 3
Cover strapPresident's comment
Patron members of the IWMSA
Compliments and well wishes for a pros-
perous and fruitful 2013. At the IWM-
SA we are well into 2013 and ready to
tackle the goals we have set for ourselves for
this year and beyond. Our calendar of events
for this year is very noteworthy and some of
the highlights include The Healthcare Waste
Summit (May), Landfill 2013 (October) as well
as the Eastern Cape Conference (August). For
a more detailed list of all our events refer to
the Wastevine and the IWMSA website.
All our goals and objectives are aligned
to our vision, which is to strive towards a
clean and healthy environment. The goals
and objectives are the result of strategic
planning sessions we have had as council
and the inputs derived from our members via
questionnaires. In this edition, I would like
to introduce your IWMSA council to you and
expound on the various portfolios assigned
to the various council members in ensuring
that we constantly strive towards achieving
our vision.
Portfolio 1: To market and brand IWMSA as
an extension of our continuous communica-
tion portfolio where we focus on priorities as
defined by the council.
This portfolio is headed up by Gail Smit
(IWMSA executive officer) and branch chair-
persons for the specific conferences held
in their branches. The key objectives of this
portfolio include:
• development of marketing and
branding strategy
• development of marketing materials (web-
site, brochures, etc.)
Prosperity, planning & portfolios
• review of the branding manual
• evaluation and extensive utilisation of mar-
keting channels
• media training of all branch chairpersons
• hosting of conferences, seminars and net-
working sessions
• the Eastern Cape Branch Conference
headed up by Kay
Hardy (IWMSA
branch chairper-
son – Eastern Cape
Branch)
• WasteCon 2014
headed up by
Melanie Traut
(IWMSA branch
chairperson – Western Cape Branch).
Portfolio 2: To facilitate government liai-
son with all spheres of government.
This por tfolio is headed up by myself and
Dr Suzan Oelofse (vice president of the
IWMSA) and its key
objectives include:
• establishment of a forum for interac-
tion with Department of Environmental
Affairs (DEA)
• hosting of WasteCon back-to-back with
the DEA Waste Khoro
• all branches to have representation of
provincial and local government officials
• co-hosting of information sharing ses-
sions with regulatory authorities
• industry awards par tnerships with provin-
cial environmental authorities (such as
All our goals and objectives are aligned to our vision, which is to strive towards a clean and healthy environment.” Deidré Nxumalo-Freeman, IWMSA
by Deidré Nxumalo-Freeman, president, IWMSA
FROM LEFT TO RIGHT: Dr A Muswema, Ms M Traut, Dr S Oelofse, Mrs De Nxumalo Freeman, Ms K Hardy and Mr Bertie Lourens
RéSource February 2013 – 5
RéSource is endorsed by:
Publisher: Elizabeth ShortenEditor: Yanna Erasmus Tel: +27 (0)11 233 2600Head of design: Frédérick DantonSenior designer: Hayley MendelowChief sub-editor: Claire NozaïcSub-editor: Patience GumboProduction manager: Antois-Leigh BotmaProduction coordinator: Jacqueline ModiseFinancial manager: Andrew Lobban Marketing & online manager: Martin HillerDistribution manager: Nomsa MasinaDistribution coordinator: Asha PursothamAdministrator: Tonya HebentonPrinters: United Litho JohannesburgTel: +27 (0)11 402 0571 Advertising sales: Christine PretoriusTel: +27 (0)11 465 8255 [email protected]
Publisher: MEDIA
No.4, 5th Avenue Rivonia, 2191PO Box 92026, Norwood 2117Tel: +27 (0)11 233 2600Share Call: 086 003 3300 Fax: +27 (0)11 234 7274/5www.3smedia.co.za
Annual subscription: [email protected] (incl VAT) South Africa ISSN 1680-4902
The Institute of Waste Management of Southern AfricaTel: +27 (0)11 675 3462E-mail: [email protected]
All material herein RéSource is copyright-protected and may not be reproduced either in whole or in part without the prior written permission of the publisher. The views and opinions ex-pressed in the magazine do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher or editor, but those of the author or other contributors under whose name contributions may appear, unless a con-tributor expresses a viewpoint or opinion in his or her capacity as an elected office bearer of a company, group or association.
© Copyright 2013. All rights reserved.
the KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape
Top Green Organisation awards).
Portfolio 3: To provide accredited edu-
cation and training relevant to the cli-
ent/municipality needs that will result
in high ethical conduct and standards
in the industry.
This por tfolio is headed up by Gail Smit
(IWMSA executive officer) assisted by a
national training committee with repre-
sentation of all the branches. The key
objectives of this por tfolio include:
• provision of accredited as well as
non-accredited training to the
waste industry
• development of national
training prospectus
• availing funds for training and develop-
ment of assessors and moderators to
conduct IWMSA accredited training
• utilisation of IWMSA members to con-
duct and facilitate training sessions.
Portfolio 4: To accredit member organisa-
tions (big, small and individuals) through
the development of a model (assessment
standard/audit) that will accredit our
member organisations, yet include men-
torship as part of the package.
This portfolio is headed up by Bertie
Lourens (IWMSA branch chairper-
son – Central Branch) and its key
objectives include:
• establishing status quo and determine
various modalities
• conducting extensive stakeholder
consultation
• development of model that incorpo-
rates stakeholder feedback.
Portfolio 5: To involve ourselves in social
responsibility opportunities with school
programmes, supporting communities
and providing assistance to those with
existing programmes resulting in tangi-
ble grassroots impact where projects get
benchmarked and used by municipalities
as well as small and micro enterprises.
This por tfolio is headed up by all
branch chairpersons and its key
objectives include:
• development of evaluation criteria for
social responsibility projects to fund
• support of IWMSA member organisa-
tions in the school/NGO categories.
Portfolio 6: To ensure that the institute
transformation policy is all-encompassing
so that this has an influence on the
needs of the members.
This portfolio is headed up by Aubrey
Muswema (IWMSA branch chairperson
– KwaZulu-Natal Branch) and Gail Smit
(IWMSA executive officer) and its key
objectives include:
• conducting status quo and needs
assessment based on the seven
BBBEE pillars:
– PDI (previously disadvantaged individu-
als) ownership percentage
– PDI senior management percentage
– PDI employment equity percentage in
work force
– Skills development percentage of sal-
ary bill
– Preferential procurement percentage
– Enterprise development percentage
– Social development percentage
• set objectives for Council and branches
to achieve.
I hope this provides insight into the goals
and objectives that we have set for our-
selves as the IWMSA council. Your assis-
tance in the attainment of these goals
and objectives is crucial to ensure that
the IWMSA remains relevant within the
waste industry. Your feedback is highly
valued and we have numerous com-
munication platforms where your voice
can be heard. Besides the traditional
methods of communication (telephone,
fax, e-mails, snail mail), we also utilise
social media extensively to maintain
contact with our membership base and
also reach other industry professionals.
Below is a list of all our contact details
and you are most welcome to communi-
cate with us utilising any (or all) of these.
Your input in directing the future of the
IWMSA is highly valued.
President's comment
IWMSA CONTACT DETAILS:
Tel: +27 (0)11 675 3462 Fax: +27 (0)11 675 3465E-mail: [email protected]: Weltevreden Shopping Centre Cnr. Kanniedood & Rinyani streets, Weltevreden ParkPostal Address: PO Box 79, Allen’s Nek, 1737
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Find us on LinkedIn
IWMSA CONTACT DETAILS:
6 – RéSource February 2013
Cover story
The acquisition process has recently
been completed, as the majority of ne-
gotiations and final agreements were
already put in place in the final quarter of
2012, say Lerena and Sithole.
The acquisition will strengthen
Boitumelong’s already strong position in
the local market, in light of its recent
partnership with leading manufacturer of
waste management equipment in Europe,
the Ros Roca Group, under Lefatse Vehicle
Solutions. “The result of Boitumelong’s
acquisition of Otto is the formation of the
first entirely BEE company to focus on
the manufacturing of waste management
products, as well as the service offerings
aspects,” explains EMC Risk Management
Consulting’s MD, Juneas Lekgetha, in
his capacity as transactional advisor on
the acquisition.
Strong rootsBoitumelong Holdings was started in 1988
by Sithole from humble beginnings – a
single borrowed flat-bed truck and eight
casual labourers. The organisation has since
evolved dramatically into a major operation
focusing on the entire value chain of waste
management, and currently hosts a large
fleet of service vehicles with a substantial
staff collective offering world-class waste
management services to residential, com-
mercial and industrial customers.
Otto Industries South Africa was estab-
lished in 1981 as only the second for-
eign investment of the group outside of
Germany. Since then, however, the group
has grown exponentially, with bases in
Australia, North America, and Asia Pacific,
not to mention their expansion into other
European markets. The changing interna-
tional dynamic and economics have neces-
sitated a change in its business model.
“They are focusing more on markets in the
European and North American sectors, and
as a result they have stopped doing busi-
ness in South Africa,” explains Lerena.
Long historySithole and Boitumelong Holdings are, how-
ever, no strangers to Otto Industries South
Africa. Sithole bought a 20% share in Otto
Industries in 1995 and in 2000 both com-
panies entered into a 50:50 joint venture to
form Otto Waste Systems.
The latest acquisition negotiations were
resolved fairly quickly in light of these
already strong bonds, with Boitumelong
entering into negotiations in June last
year and the final agreements
being reached in December 2012.
“This is pending approval of all the
necessary documentation to be finalised in
the first quarter of 2013,” explains Sithole.
As a result of the JV, Sithole was 50%
owner of Otto Waste Systems, which meant
he was not new to the business, with a
good understanding of not only the industry
and market but also the organisation – this
was one of the key aspects in the negotia-
tions. “The other partners knew him and his
business practices well, and felt comfort-
able entering into discussions with him as
they believed this would make the transi-
tion through the acquisition smoother. That
made it very easy to enter into negotiations
for both parties,” explains Lerena.
Optimising efficienciesSithole believes the transition will take place
with minimal upheaval. “Basically what
we will be doing is evalu-
ating efficiencies and
structures in order to
Black-owned investment company Boitumelong Holdings has acquired the previously
internationally owned Otto Industries South Africa and Otto Waste Systems. Otto’s MD,
Rob Lerena, and Boitumelong Holdings’ executive chairman, John Sithole, speak to
RéSource about the acquisition.
BOITUMELONG HOLDINGS
Acquisition to change local waste management landscape
RéSource February 2013 – 7
Cover story
strengthen systems and processes already
in place. It is really more about strengthening
the business,” he says.
The increased focus on effectiveness and
efficiency is almost instantaneously evident
when considering that the previous owner
was based in Europe and managed the
business long distance by proxy, believes
Lekgetha. “The new owner, Boitumelong
Holdings, is based in South Africa. It knows
the waste management market and the
role players, so it will be easier to identify
efficiencies as it takes a more hands-on
approach,” says Lekgetha.
The increase in output efficiencies is
not the only reason the team forecast a
better business result – its strengthening
BEE status is also likely to play a strong
role. Boitumelong Holdings’ chief executive,
Tumelo Sithole, says: “We are a black-
owned company in the entirety now. We will
be getting a Level 2 or 3 BEE rating in the
next three to four months; however, we are
targeting a Level 1 rating, be it now or in
the long run.”
John Sithole adds: “I think this in itself
will open up a number of opportunities with
regards to new contracts and new market
opportunities not previously available to
the organisation, due to the preference
availed to BEE companies in local govern-
ment contracts specifically. This will allow
is a lot of potential to benefit from introduc-
ing our system,” says John Sithole.
Holistic approachBoth John Sithole and Lerena are quick to
indicate that it is not just bins they are sell-
ing and marketing, but rather a holistic waste
management system.
Although the recently acquired Otto Waste
Systems’ focus has to date been on the pro-
duction of virgin high-density polyethylene,
ultra-violet stabilised waste containers for
provincial and municipal authorities, as well
as industrial and private contractors, the bin
is merely one aspect of the recovery and
collection system. “The advantage of advo-
cating the entire system is that it increases
the waste management process effectivity,
while saving significant costs, introducing a
number of controls and ensuring the correct
hygiene practices,” says Lerena.
However, education remains key in ensur-
ing the successful roll-out of the system.
“You still have to teach the individual house-
holds how the system works so that they can
effectively take advantage of the system,”
says John Sithole , adding that this education
needs to be happening from the point of the
service provider to the end user in order to
ensure peak performance.
While Otto’s speciality is in the manufac-
ture and supply of waste management tools,
Boitumelong Holdings is involved in the
service provision aspects of waste manage-
ment, which adds significant value as the
focus then becomes holistic in nature.
“We are not only going to be manufactur-
ing a bin. We also offer the services to back
that up. It is going to be a one-stop shop
where we supply everything from a truck
to a lifter, to the bin, to education,” says
John Sithole.
John Sithole and the team are quietly
confident that with the recent acquisition
and continued growth on Boitumelong’s
side, 2013 is going to be a growth year for
the new firm. “It has to be in light of recent
developments, and our expectations are
high going forward,” concludes Sithole.
Left to right: Otto Industries South Africa’s Rob Lerena, Boitumelong Holdings’ executive chairman, John Sithole, and Boitumelong Holdings’
chief executive, Tumelo Sithole
Otto Industries South Africa specialises in the manufacture of waste management tools such
as plastic containers and wheelie bins
us to collaborate with more municipalities
that were not previously in the system.”
He adds that the most exciting reality or
opportunity for him is when the cumulative
waste management system they now offer
gets into townships. “This spells immense
growth for us.”
SADC and beyondJohn and Tumelo Sithole and Lerena indicate
that expansion into Africa has been targeted
as a growth strategy for the organisation
moving forward. “Growth is coming to Africa.
I think Europe is exhausted. It has been in the
system for years and Africa is only just being
introduced to it,” says John Sithole
Lerena points out that in the sub-Saharan
region specifically, business is still being
entered into with Europe, at immense cost.
“Why are they not doing business with
Africa when the resources and technology
are available?”
Although this is a strategic focus, the
organisation has already garnered some
small orders and is currently setting up a
number of agents throughout the region,
with a focus on the SADC region predomi-
nantly. “We want to strengthen our influence
in the SADC countries and then use it as a
springboard into the rest of sub-Saharan
Africa,” says Lerena, adding that the entire
process is all about exploring partnerships
– both established and potential.
The challenge – and the potential in some
respects – lies in the fact that SADC coun-
tries have very different waste management
environments compared to the South African
markets. “It is a very dynamic and different
market. Look at Angola for example.
It is a fast-growing economy and
country, and yet it is not in the
system and their waste system is
not up to scratch as yet, so there
Production on-site is set to continue as normal after the changeover
of ownership
8 – RéSource February 2013
Hot seat
We are in a very dynamic phase in re-
spect of legislation regarding man-
aging South Africa’s waste. Not only
in terms of the primary legislation – the Waste
Act – but also in implementing the Act,” says
Leon Bredenhann, Strategic Advisor for Inte-
grated Waste Management at Golder in Africa.
Golder will therefore be holding waste man-
agement workshops to engage the waste
management sector on the legislation and
the implications of the rollout thereof, among
other aspects. The workshops will be held
in May this year in three of South Africa’s
key cities, namely Johannesburg, Durban
and Cape Town. The workshops are aimed
at senior decision-makers in companies per-
taining to waste management responsibili-
ties in mining, oil and gas, energy, chemical
manufacturing industries (including pharma-
ceutical) and the agricultural industry, as well
as decision-makers in government.
The workshops are set to host a number of
international speakers in order to contextual-
ise the local dialogue in the global context,
as well as a number of local waste manage-
ment experts.
A definite needThe necessity for the workshop in the current
local waste management context is clear,
believes Bredenhann. The most proactive,
financially rewarding and long-term cost-
efficient way to protect our environment and
contribute to resource conservation is in the
opportunity and choice that each individual
manufacturer, industry, mine and owner of
a waste activity company is presented with
– namely to prevent and/or minimise waste,
optimise its resource value and advance green
economies. In this way, proactively managing
waste makes economic sense.
“For a number of reasons, managing waste
and implementing supporting legislation
have become increasingly challenging, espe-
cially if considered against the backdrop of
South Africa being a developing country that
is home to mining and industry infrastruc-
ture on a par with developed countries. The
challenges are compounded by the reality of
limited water resources and a significantly
eco-tourism-based economy. However, in a
truly democratic society, governance is a
joint responsibility. A platform to discuss
not only the various issues, but also an
opportunity to share ideas and innovations
is critical to any industry and so too, with
waste management,” says Bredenhann. The
waste management workshops will therefore
create a forum where the current status quo
of waste management and the environment
will be discussed.
“It is also critical that the industry achieves
the objectives of the various Acts contained
in the legislation pertaining to waste and this
will be unpacked – including strategies, clas-
sifications and processes. There is also a lot
of work that needs to be done in terms of
remediation, contaminated land and wastage
WASTE MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
Golder Associates unpacks waste management legislation, its implementation and the
future impacts in what is sure to be defi nitive waste management workshops, to be held
in May 2013.
“
Focusing on a sustainable future
RéSource February 2013 – 9
Hot seat
in the industry. Technologies and their various
applications will be discussed and explained,
and ideas will be shared. National waste
management systems, waste to energy and
WRATE (Waste and Resources Assessment
Tool for the Environment) will also be brought
to the fore,” says Bredenhann.
The workshops, which are seen as a
platform to engage rather than transfer
knowledge in a top-down fashion, will consist
of four key focus areas, namely unpacking
the current legislation, Golder’s approach to
translating the current contexts and oppor-
tunities into value, the value of sustain-
able design in landfills, and
finally assessing ‘where to
from here’.
Examining current legislationAccording to Bredenhann the
current legislation is very
dynamic and comprehensive;
however, the focus from here on out needs
to be on implementation and industry buy-in.
This starts with the national waste manage-
ment strategy that is a course of action – a
road to achieve the objectives of the law – and
it affects everybody in society, from national
government to local government, industry and
the rights of individuals.
“It’s a strategy that has a huge impact
and needs to be understood by all the role
players in the waste management stream
and this is what we will also be unpacking
in the workshops.” Additionally, best prac-
tice standards are also to be investigated,
touching on issues relating to how to classify
waste, how to manage waste information,
which disposal sites are acceptable and
what standards are required for disposal
sites. This entails a keen understanding of
what Bredenhann terms the “fundamentals
of the law”.
The first focus of the workshops therefore
seeks to give a holistic overview of the cur-
rent legislative environment. “It is about
where we stand currently in South Africa in
respect to legislation and what the legislation
requires from us. And what the implications
of conformance and non-
conformance are. The
beauty of conformance is
that it could, if correctly
managed, add value to a
company’s financial bot-
tom line.”
A company’s sole aim,
however, should not be
compliance. “It is one thing to gain compli-
ance, but it is better to save costs, reduce
risks and increase your organisation’s sus-
tainability,” says Bredenhann. This view also
relates to rectifying past transgressions and,
through the workshops, the company will
seek to specifically address the issue of con-
taminated land and how to rehabilitate that
land. “We want to go beyond remediation
though. We want to take remediated land
and allocate new land use and this is where
the value is unlocked,” he says.
With regards to Golder’s contaminated
land service offering, “the value in Golder’s
expertise is managing the spectrum of
sources that results in land contamination,
whether that spectrum involves organic,
inorganic or nuclear waste, and modelling
the risk to ultimate receptors and mitigating
against those risks through various means”.
The economics of wasteAnother focus area is the resource value
of waste, which is also a focus area in the
Waste Management Act, and how this value
in the waste chain can be unlocked. “The
Act almost lists the opportunities where you
could, instead of creating and disposing of
waste, explore opportunities for deriving extra
value from that waste,” says Bredenhann.
In dealing with this topic, a two-pronged
approach should be taken. First, investigat-
ing the legal process of getting approval for
recovery and managing the risk in respect of
third-party use (downstream use). Second,
from a more practical perspective, the work-
shops will unpack optimising and investigat-
ing those opportunities through feasibility
studies around the application, all the way
through to implementation.
Other technologies to be investigated
include using WRATE
modelling to optimise
efficiency in respect
of waste logistics and
reducing organisations’
carbon footprint as a
result, as well as reme-
diation options for the
closure of mines.
Sustainable designThe third focus highlighted by Bredenhann
is on integrated waste management facili-
ties as opposed to just disposal facilities.
“The essence of an integrated facility is that
rather than just accepting that waste arriving
at landfills is earmarked for final disposal, it
is viewed as an opportunity to gain value. It
is not a new concept; however, specialists
should be contracted to translate the value
chain into operation – design wise – which is
where the shortfall often arises.”
In addition to
focusing on mate-
rial recovery, storage, treatment and then
only disposal, the approach should be to
ensure that these facilities operate as
value-adding facilities in the communities
or locations where they are based using
specific modelling tools, namely Landsim,
Goldsim and the newest tool in the arsenal,
Gassim. These manage the risk of those
landfills on the downstream side.
“Positioning a landfill is also critical in
managing costs for transferring waste to
that landfill and also in managing the social
sensitivities, where air and odours are key
issues for the public downstream. Specific
air quality modelling should be used to deter-
mine the distance.”
A visionary approachThe final category attempts to “look in the
crystal ball and build a bridge between the cur-
rent status quo and the realities of the future,”
says Bredenhann. This entails managing peo-
ple from situations (such as contaminated
land) to a sustainable future and debating
what that reality will entail, while trying to
prevent repetition of the inherited legacy of the
past. The questions to be asked, according
to Bredenhann, are: What do we do now?
What do we need to do differently? What can
we do collectively?
Interested parties who would like to attend
these workshops can contact Golder’s media
relations manager in Africa, Lucinda Scholtz,
on +27 (0)11 313 1151 or via e-mail on
The Act almost lists the opportunities where
you could, instead of creating and disposing of
waste, explore opportunities for deriving extra value
from that waste.” Leon Bredenhann, Strategic Advisor for Integrated
Waste Management at Golder in Africa
10 – RéSource February 2013
Solid waste
Recycling the way nature intended
That South Africa has to divert waste from landfi ll sites and fi nd other management
options is a given. One of the simplest options is the diversion of organic waste from
landfi lls with a possible view of composting it. The Department of Environmental
Affairs has tasked engineering and environmental consultant Jeffares & Green to
develop a national strategy on this, as Yanna Erasmus discovers.
RéSource February 2013 – 11
Solid waste
Unofficial estimates put organic waste
around the 13% mark of the total
waste produced in South Africa and
roughly a third of this is being composted,
recycled or reused. However, the composition
of domestic waste differs vastly across mu-
nicipalities in South Africa and organic waste
can make up anything from 10% to 58% of the
waste stream. Whatever the figures may be,
there is a lot of waste going to landfill that
should be diverted, particularly due to the fact
that this type of wet waste is the key contribu-
tor to leachate and greenhouse gas produc-
tion on landfills. As such, the Department of
Environmental Affairs should be commended
for having a strategy developed for compost-
ing. The department should also continue to
apply its energy looking at other possible alter-
natives once this composting alternative has
been addressed.
According to Stuar t Gower-Jackson
of Jeffares & Green, the creation of the
National Organic Waste Composting Strategy
will soon be complete. This project required
a lot of initial groundwork in trying to estab-
lish some form of status quo of organic
waste quantum in the country due to a
lack of quantifiable data on organic waste
volumes produced in the provinces, as well
as data that differentiates between differ-
ing organic waste streams. A literature and
review of the current applications of organic
waste in South Africa and elsewhere in the
world was conducted along with a review of
the relevant legal requirement(s) in South
Africa and then comment was sought from a
database of over 1 000 stakeholders, which
included individuals, companies, NGOs and
public entities.
A draft status quo document was circulated
for public comment until 21 November 2012,
after which a final document was written
to include the pertinent comments and
responses received from the public.
According to Gower-Jackson: “A country’s
strategy should be practical, implementable,
applicable and affordable. Most importantly,
it should be sustainable and must have
broad-based participation on all levels.”
Technically, food and abattoir waste along
with offal and manure could all be cat-
egorised as organic waste. Paper, wool and
other organic materials and certain sewage
sludge could also be included into this cat-
egory; it is not just regular garden waste that
applies. This will have to be included into a
strategy so that the different categories of
organic waste streams and the beneficial
use thereof are defined.
Interestingly, there is no specific legisla-
tion that deals with composting itself. The
onus rests upon the municipalities to man-
age organic waste and the only legislation
that is applicable to composting is the con-
struction of a facility as well as the activities
and processes on the site. Further, in terms
of the Air Quality Act, if more than a tonne of
animal matter is processed daily, an emis-
sions licence must be applied for. Finally,
the seller of any compost product must reg-
ister with the Department of Agriculture’s
Technical Services.
Composting methodsComposting methods are diverse and can be
separated by the level of technology used to
prepare the compost. In the draft document
drawn up by Jeffares & Green, the lowest
technological level is the static pile where no
aeration is used. These piles can be quite
large, starting at around a cubic metre. Low-
technology applications include the use of
bins or barrels, windrows and vermicompost-
ing (as examples). In the case of the former,
aeration can be introduced in various ways,
including carton layers or possibly turning the
windrows, and in the latter earthworms are
used to degrade the matter. From here on it
moves to medium and high technology where
equipment, including turning machines,
mechanised continuous flow worm systems,
tunnels and other vessels, and even cylin-
drical drums are used. Lower and cheaper
technology use tends to take longer, needs
more space and delivers a variable grade
product. Alternatively a higher-value compost
product can be developed in a smaller space
(although at added expense). The simpler
technologies would be easily applied and
operated by municipalities or private sector
but, as medium and high technological inputs
are required, public-private partnerships and
predominantly private sector initiatives would
tend to be more common.
CommentaryMain concerns from stakeholders were on
the financial viability of composting since the
return on investment is slow and the profit
ABOVE AND BELOW Composting methods are diverse and can be separated by the level of technology used to prepare the compost
RéSource February 2013 – 13
Johannes Schuback & Sons(S.A.) PTY Limited, Johannesburg / RSAPhone: +27 11 7062270, Fax: +27 11 7069236
AMANDUS KAHL GmbH & Co. KGDieselstrasse 5, D-21465 Reinbek / Hamburg, GermanyPhone: +49 (0)40 727 71-0, Fax: +49 (0)40 727 71-100
[email protected] www.akahl.de
■ Most Advanced Technology ■ Most Efficient ■ Most Professional ■ Less Maintenance
■ Less Energy ■ Less Spare Parts ■ Integrated Rubber Granu late Production
Waste Tire Recycling PlantsWaste Tire Recycling Plants
margins small. Adding value to organic waste
or turning it into energy were both strong
themes in the general comments and the
South African Waste Pickers Association took
it one step further saying the beneficiation
of organic waste was vital for the associa-
tion. Mention was also made of the use of
chemical fertilisers by commercial farmers
with suggestions of an awareness campaign,
synergies with the agricultural departments
and other efforts. However, some parties
were concerned about the regular and con-
sistent supply of raw material (feedstock) for
operations to ensure consistency of product
and delivery. Here suggestions were made
for municipalities to communicate better,
work together and do improved research
to gather more informative baseline data.
The diversion of organic waste from landfill
also featured strongly, one of the causes
of informal reclaimers on landfill sites, and
comments included legislation to prevent
organic waste from going to landfill as well
as separation at source initiatives. One
key issue is the cost of transport, which
financially hinders initiatives. Capacity (also
for equipment maintenance), public aware-
ness, incentives, subsidies, public private
partnerships and a good commercial mar-
ket appear to form the backbone of the rec-
ommendations and comments made, and
these would certainly have to be included
in a country strategy if composting is to
become the way forward for some of the
country’s organic waste .
At the star t of 2012, Jeffares & Green
began to host more stakeholder work-
shops, garner more commentar y and
engage the major metros again, among
other key stakeholders. More informa-
tion from what is being done in this field
is also being gathered. The process is
expected to be completed soon and a plan
for the country’s organic waste should
emerge; hopefully leading the way for fur-
ther diversion from landfill.
Solid waste
14 – RéSource February 2013
Solid waste
The Retail Motor Industry (RMI) had at-
tacked the Redisa plan on several
matters, but Judge Neil Tuchten found
one point of contention – that of Section
15.1 where waste reduction targets were dis-
cussed. Counsel for the RMI, Japie Vorster,
told the court that not only were the targets
flawed, but the section was added after the
closure of the period for industry and public
comment. This, Vorster said, made the plan
illegal as the changes made were ‘material’.
According to the plan, the targets for
waste reduction were: “Within 12 months,
processing of 30 000 tpa of waste tyres;
within 24 months, processing of 90 000 tpa
of waste tyres; within 36 months, process-
ing of 150 000 tpa of waste tyres; within
60 months, processing of 400 000 tpa of
waste tyres.”
The RMI contends that according to an
independent expert report, “it would cause
a backlog of 427 917 t of waste tyres by
month 41. This is approximately double the
waste tyre mass sold in South Africa annu-
ally.” In fact, the court heard that Redisa’s
own figures had substantiated the calcula-
tion of the backlog. Redisa countered that
within 10 years the backlog would be entirely
removed, but its plan has only been approved
for five years. Vorster said that the plan has
to be republished for comment. The minister
of Water and Environmental Affairs, Edna
Molewa, who has been to court several times
to defend the plan, removed the section
under contention and it was published again.
The levy of R2.30/kg also came under fire
with Vorster telling the court that R33 mil-
lion had been spent by Redisa to ready
its infrastructure. Monthly office rent of
R300 000 and fittings of R8 million were fur-
ther costs incurred, all of which would have
to be paid for by the tyre levy. A reasonable
decision-maker, Vorster said, would never
have approved the plan.
Molewa’s speedy response was welcomed
by Redisa. Its CEO, Hermann Erdmann, said:
“We are very pleased that the minister has
taken such prompt action to resolve the
chaos that the suspension of the plan was
causing in the tyre industry. Getting the plan
suspended pending a review application
meant that the industry would have been in
a state of uncertainty for months, not know-
ing if the waste tyre management fee was
going to have to be paid or not. A review
application takes months to complete, and
for all that time the industry would have
had to provisionally set aside funds to pay
the fee if the Review Court found in favour
of the minister, and deal with refund claims
if it found against her. By re-gazetting the
plan, the minister is following the resolution
proposed in the judgment and bringing san-
ity back into the tyre market.”
About the planScrap tyres are a great challenge in South
Africa as between 10 and 15 million tyres are
produced annually and around 10 million tyres
are scrapped every year. There are only three
active tyre recycling companies in the country
at present, recycling around 1 000 t each,
which means an estimated 13% of waste
tyres are recycled. The balance typically ends
up in landfills, dumped in the veld or illegally
burned for their scrap steel content. This,
in turn, creates a growing health and envi-
ronmental problem. Redisa says that it will
“establish a network of transporters to collect
scrap tyres from the entire country, supply
them to recyclers and provide support and
help to develop secondary markets for the
recyclers’ output products. In doing so, the
plan is designed to create jobs, particularly
in the informal sector, and create majority
black-owned small and micro businesses.”
Redisa’s plan thus has focused on creating
employment opportunities in the removal of
waste tyres that are already in the environ-
ment. These will be delivered to one of the
150 collection points that will be established
across the country.
In essence, the plan involves a levy
of R2.30/kg on all locally manufactured
and imported tyres. Instead of the pro-
ducer responsibility system for recycling,
the association opted for a levy system.
The decision was based on the argument
that producer responsibility is a voluntary
system, which does not offer a fair playing
field. In a levy system, all producers and
importers operate equally.
Readers requiring further information can log
on to www.redisa.org.za
REDISA
Scrap tyre plan survives another blowThe much beleaguered waste tyre management
plan of the Recycling and Economic Development
Initiative of South Africa (Redisa) was re-
gazetted on 30 November last year after the
Retail Motor Industry won an interdict against
the implementation of the plan 10 days earlier,
Yanna Erasmus reports.
Scrap tyres are a great challenge in South Africa as between 10 and 15 million tyres are produced annually and around 10 million tyres are scrapped every year
RéSource February 2013 – 15
Solid waste
PART III OF IV
Solid waste management practices in Western AfricaIn Western Africa, the rapid rate of uncontrolled and unplanned urbanisation, coupled
with a high density of urban settlement and changing consu mption patterns, have
accelerated the need for water supply, sanitation and waste management infrastructure.
This is the third instalment of four parts
of a paper investigating waste manage-
ment and its challenges in the west of
the African continent.
Plastic wasteAccording to the survey results, separate col-
lection of plastic waste only exists in Lagos,
Nigeria, through separate collection bins,
skips or bags. The collection is organised
by the Lagos Waste Management Authority.
In addition, plastic waste is also collected
informally. The official collection rate reaches
around 35% of the total plastic waste gener-
ated. More than 1 500 formal and informal
workers are engaged in the plastic collection
and transportation. For transportation, open
trucks and compactor trucks are used. In all
other cases, plastic waste is informally and
formally collected within the municipal solid
waste collection system. Therefore, the collec-
tion frequency as well as the collection tech-
nology is the same as for household waste.
There are informal waste collectors that
sort plastic waste out of municipal waste
and sell it to generate income. In Accra,
about 8% of the total plastic waste gener-
ated is estimated to be recovered by pri-
vate collection companies. There are groups
that deal with plastic waste by operating
collection points and by selling the collected
plastic to bulk purchasers who collect it with
trucks for further processing in the country
or for export. Others operate at the landfill
site where they sort out any useful material
and sell it to prospective buyers. All these
activities happen informally, though on an
increasing scale.
Plastic reuse, mainly of plastic bottles, is a
common practice. In Dakar, there are many
informally organised practices of plastic
reuse. On the Mbeubeuss dumpsite near
Dakar, groups of women wash and clean
plastic bottles for reuse. They sell the bot-
tles to women merchants. Other activities
include the sewing of plastic sheets to pro-
duce roofs for rural houses, the recuperation
of material to make cushions or refurbishing
handbags to sell them again. The Tolbiac
Street in Dakar is the main area where
plastics are recovered, collected, sorted
and recycled by the informal waste pickers
and recyclers. It is ideally situated to collect
plastics from industrial waste, close to the
port, the industrial free zone and various
markets. In Ghana, few companies reuse
polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate
(PET) and polypropylene (PP) bottles and
bags are produced from discarded plastic
materials. Information on plastic reuse is
scarce. In Nigeria, reused plastic wastes are
mainly bags, bottles, barrels and films, so
it is again focused on PE and PET products.
There are around 2 500 formal and informal
workers engaged in the reuse and recycling
of plastics.
In Dakar, mainly PE and PP is collected.
The plastic is directly brought to the recycling
plant. The treatment processes are quite
simple and include manual sorting (PE and
PP from the others), washing and drying of
the plastics. Mechanical recycling processes
such as shredding or extruding exist in few
cases. In Accra, a sorting plant is under con-
struction. Only few companies are involved
in plastic recycling. The recycling process
includes sorting, shredding, washing, dry-
ing and extruding. The resulting pellets are
usually sold to other plastic companies or
exported. Products manufactured from recy-
cled plastics are, for example, buckets or
chairs. On a more informal scale, there are
plastic recyclers who scavenge for plastic
materials at homes or in dumpsites. Some
of them melt the waste plastic to produce
beads, which are then sold on the local
LEFT Plastic waste sorting at dumpsite, SenegalSource: IAGU 2006
RIGHT Plastic waste sorting, GhanaSource: www.trashybags.org 2012
16 – RéSource February 2013
market. In Lagos, in addition to PE and PET,
also nylon and tyres are recycled. The recy-
cling technologies applied include sorting,
shredding, washing, drying and extruding in
order to produce pellets, flakes and nylon.
The final products/applications obtained
from recycled plastics are e.g. waste bags,
shoes, chopping boards and hair extensions.
Final disposal practices are the same as
for municipal solid waste. Plastic waste is
disposed of in authorised landfills or on
irregular and illegal dumpsites. It is also
quite common that plastic waste, especially
plastic bags or sheets, is openly burned in
backyards, markets, at stadiums, railway
stations, dumpsites etc. In Dakar, within
the next three years, three industrial meth-
anisation plants should be operational. This
implies previous separation of non-organic
waste. As there is no incineration plant pro-
jected, this is a future opportunity to organ-
ise separate plastic collection and recycling.
E-wasteIn general, there exists no formal separate
collection of e-waste. Collection is mostly in
the hand of informal collectors who pick up or
buy obsolete electrical and electronic equip-
ment (EEE) from door to door, and scavenge at
official or irregular dumpsites. In Ghana and
Nigeria, the informal collection is well organ-
ised due to the high amount of e-waste gen-
eration and the ability of the collectors to pay
for the consumer’s e-waste since they in turn
receive money from the informal recyclers for
every piece collected. These practices lead to
collection rates of up to 95% in urban regions
in Ghana and Nigeria. In Senegal and the Ivory
Coast, due to smaller amounts of e-waste
generated, the informal collection is not very
widespread and the collection rate is probably
lower that in Ghana and Nigeria. Informal col-
lection is usually done with handcarts, e.g.
made from boards and old car axles. Some
collectors also use trucks. There is no regular
collection period of the informal collection.
Formal collection of e-waste is done by for-
mal recycling companies. They have arrange-
ments with certain e-waste generators that
enable them to pick up their e-waste for free.
Refurbishment and repair of obsolete EEE
is very common. Nigeria features the largest
refurbishment and repair sector with exten-
sive markets where second-hand products
are repaired, refurbished and sold in the
same or close by locations. These markets
are informal but very well organised. In the
Ivory Coast, Ghana and Nigeria, there are
associations of repairers and technicians
of EEE. The approximate number of repairer
and refurbishers is summarised in Table 1.
In Ivory Coast, repairers are the largest pro-
vider of e-waste to scrap dealers. They usu-
ally have a close relationship and are some-
times located next to each other, exchanging
materials according to their needs. In all
target countries, the refurbishing and repair
sector is highly specialised and has high
repair success rates of up to 70%. It con-
tributes significantly to the extension of the
lifespan of EEE and thus to the reduction of
e-waste generation.
The e-waste recycling sector is mostly
informal. In Ghana, the hub of the recycling
operations is the Greater Accra Region at
the scrap yards of Agbogbloshie, Gallaway
and Ashiaman, although smaller scrapyards
where e-waste is also dismantled are spread
all over the country. In Senegal, informal
recyclers also do collection and repair, either
in informal warehouses disseminated all over
Dakar or on the dumping site of Mbeubeuss.
In Ivory Coast, the main scrapyards where
the dismantling of e-waste takes place are
located in the municipalities of Kumasi and
Marcory (Anoumabo). In Nigeria, in contrast
to the large and well-organised refurbishing
and repair sector, e-waste recycling activities
are at rather a small scale and spread over
the large cities. In all countries, the informal
recyclers work in numerous small workshops
within the scrapyards where a few recyclers
work together or one recycler employs sev-
eral workers. In few cases, recyclers deal
directly with end-processing partners, such
as refineries, by selling them the recovered
metals. In many cases, middlemen are
handling collection of recovered fractions
from the recyclers and bring them to end-
processing partners. In larger scrapyards,
the workers are often organised in associa-
tions or unions. The local recycling activities
are similar in all countries (see Table 2).
First, if possible, spare parts are sorted out
and sold to the repair or refurbishment sec-
tor. E-waste is manually dismantled, some-
times by crude methods such as smashing
or treating with a chisel, sometimes with
screwdrivers etc., and then sorted into met-
als and other fractions.
Copper cables are often burnt to remove
the plastic insulation. Insulating foam
from obsolete refrigerators, primarily
LEFT E-waste refurbishing, NigeriaSource: Empa 2009
RIGHT E-waste recycling, GhanaSource: Green Advocacy Ghana 2010
TABLE 1: Jobs in e-waste management repair, refurbishment, collection and recyclingGhana Ivory Coast Nigeria Senegal
Number of workers engaged in repair and refurbishment (formal and informal)
Accra: 10 000Ghana: 14 000
4 000 Lagos: 21 600
N/A
Number of informal workers engaged in collection and recycling
Accra: 4 500 to 6 000Ghana: 6 300 to 9 600
N/A N/A Mbeubeuss scrapyard: 800
Source: (SBC 2011; Prakash et al. 2010; Messou and Rochat 2011; Wone and Rochat 2008)
Solid waste
Mills & Otten ccEnvironmental Consultants
1998/46338/23 Johannesburg Cape TownTel: (011) 486 0062 Tel: (021) 671 7107 Fax: (086) 554 6573 Fax: (021) 671 7107 Contact: Charles Mills / Kirstin Otten Contact: Stephanie de Beer
Independent Environmental Consultants specialising in:
Environmental Impact Assessments Environmental Management Systems Environmental Audits
Contaminated Land Assessment Environmental Management Plans Waste License Applications
Solid waste
18 – RéSource February 2013
polyurethane, and/or old car tyres are the
main fuels used to sustain the fires. The
CRT monitor screens and other ‘non profit-
able’ fractions such as plastic casings, key-
boards, capacitors, dry batteries, etc., are
not recovered and usually dumped and even-
tually burnt in order to reduce the volumes
at the dumpsites. The uncontrolled dumping
and burning of hazardous fractions lead to
significant negative impacts on health and
environment. Table 2 summarises the local
and foreign recycling activities of various
e-waste components and fractions as well as
the resulting environmental impacts.
The amount of fractions produced is dif-
ficult to estimate. According to the general
composition of e-waste, it can be assumed
that about 40% of the weight can be recov-
ered and around 60% is dumped or burned.
In each country some formal recycling
activities exist. The formal recyclers usu-
ally get e-waste from corporate consumers.
Valuable fractions that cannot be further
processed in the country itself are exported
to Europe. However, only a very small share
of all e-waste is recycled formally (in Ghana,
it is estimated at a level below 1%).
E-waste can be found in disposed munici-
pal solid waste in all countries, but it
is normally sorted out at dumpsites and
brought to informal scrapyards for disman-
tling. Non-valuable or toxic fractions result-
ing from e-waste recycling, such as plastic
cases and leaded glass from CRT screens,
batteries, capacitors, etc., are disposed of
together with municipal waste on illegal or
official dumpsites, in garbage bins, on the
outskirt of municipalities or in reservoirs,
rivers, lagoons or lakes. Since there is no
controlled sanitary landfill for municipal solid
waste in any of the countries, there is no
TABLE 2: Pre-processing and end-processing of different e-waste fractionsLocal informal pre-processing
Resulting components and fractions
Local formal and informal end-processing
Foreign end-processing
Environmental impacts of informal practices
Burning of copper cables
Copper Formal smelters, informal smelters Formal smelters High dioxin emissions from cable burning
Manual dismantling and sorting
Copper
Ferrous metals Formal smelters Formal smelters
Aluminium Formal smelters, informal smelters (e.g. production of cooking items)
Toxic emissions during smelting processes
Lead Local informal smelters (e.g. production of sinkers for the fishing industry)
Formal smelters Toxic emissions during smelting processes
Printed wiring boards (PWB containing precious metals)
Disposal Hydrometallurgical treatment in Asia
Contamination of water and soil
Plastic Disposal and burning Plastic may contain brominated flame retardants. High dioxin emissions from burning
CRT tubes (containing lead, beryllium, phosphor, etc.)
Crushing and disposal During the crushing, the dust containing hazardous substances is set free
Hazardous fractions (PCB in capacitors, mercury in backlights, batteries)
Disposal and burning Contamination of air, water and soil
Source: (Amoyaw-Osei et al. 2011; Messou and Rochat 2011; Wone and Rochat 2008; SBC 2011)
infrastructure for the environmentally sound
final disposal of non-valuable or hazardous
fractions available.
This is an abridged version on the project of
Integrated Waste Management in Western Africa.
The duration of the project, funded by the EU
within the Seventh Framework Programme, was
two years and the results of the research were
submitted during May 2012. For a full version
including references, please contact Chantelle
Mattheus at [email protected]
LEFT Burning of copper cables, GhanaSource: Green Advocacy Ghana 2010
RIGHT Informal dumping of e-waste, GhanaSource: Green Advocacy Ghana 2010
octa
rine
3754
Engineering Growth through Infrastructure
Johannesburg 011 922 3300
East London 043 727 1057
Cape Town 021 531 8110
Durban 031 717 2300
www.kaytech.co.za
bidim R
20 – RéSource February 2013
Recycling
20 – RéSource February 2013
A round 270 Mℓ of lubricants are sold
annually in South Africa and, of this,
half is lost through use. That leaves
135 Mℓ of used oil, of which some 80 Mℓ is
accounted for through the tracking of hazard-
ous waste regulations. This implies that ap-
proximately 55 Mℓ is being disposed of irre-
sponsibly. In 2005, the Rose Foundation, in
collaboration with collectors including BME,
formed the National Oil Recycling Associa-
tion of South Africa (NORA-SA). The associa-
tion promotes the recovery and recycling of
used oil in the country with a strict code of
conduct, lobbying to enable legislation and
engagement with the industry. Used oil has a
powerful capacity for contamination and pollu-
tion. We all know the Rose Foundation adage
that one litre of used oil can contaminate a
million litres of water, but the high concentra-
tion of metal ions, lead, zinc, chromium and
copper persist in ecosystems and are also
emitted when used in furnaces and the like.
In the environment, it decomposes slowly. In
essence, oil, used or otherwise, should never
be disposed of unless collected by a NORA-SA
accredited member.
While the bulk of used oil is currently
reprocessed into industrial fuel oil and used
as a substitute for heavy fuel oil, there
are also companies such as PPC that buy
untreated used oil and fire up their lime kilns
as well as others that
produce an industrial-
grade furnace fuel
from used oil. But
there is another appli-
cation that BME calls
a cradle-to-cradle philosophy.
Since around 2007, BME has used recy-
cled oil in its explosives products, which
are used on mines across the African
continent. While this may not be a novel
Novel method of used oil recyclingWhile the use of used oil in industrial explosives accounts for up to 80% of all
explosives used in North America, its use is still growing in South Africa. Using oil
for ANFO (ammonium nitrate fuel oil) is an attractive alternative to disposing of this
hazardous waste and BME, a member of the Omnia Group, is getting it right, writes
Yanna Erasmus.
In essence, oil, used or otherwise, should never be disposed of unless collected by a NORA-SA accredited member
BME’s used oil team: L to R – Erika Haasbroek, Nicoleen Cilliers, Emelia Mascis and Martie Creamer
20720
Up to 15 years imprisonment.
Dispose of your used oil here...
...and you could end up here.
So for peace of mind, contact a NORA-SA approved collector or recycler to safely dispose of your used oil. Call 0860 NORA-SA (6672 72) for a collector in your area.
22 – RéSource February 2013
application, only BME thus far has man-
aged to produce stable explosives bulk
products through its emulsion technology.
According to Emilia Mascis of BME: “We
create a new product out of a waste prod-
uct. Instead of taking used oil and dispos-
ing of it responsibly, we are creating a new
usable product and returning it to the point
of generation. This type of management
ensures that once a product reaches the
end of its lifespan, its component parts are
recovered and reused, thereby becoming
inputs for new products and materials.”
The company has two plants, one in
Losberg near Fochville in the North West
and the Dryden packaging plant near
Delmas. According to Mascis, the recipe
of the company’s success is a system
of checks and balances that ensures the
‘purity’ of the used oil product.
“The system begins with an audit of the
mine, including the brand of oil that the
company uses. Full checks are performed
on the storage facilities of the used oil
on-site. For example, oil tanks should not
rust. The storage system must be closed.
In other words, it must be a sealed system
from pumping the used oil out and into
storage. We check for spillages and leaks,
safety around the site and the company
procedures. BME will then take a sample of
oil, which is sent to our Losberg plant for
testing. This is done prior to any collection
taking place. If the results comply with our
requirements and the used oil is ‘clean’, we
will collect. Prior to processing, however,
another sample is taken for testing. This
has been the reason for our success.”
Quarantine tanks are used at the com-
pany’s facilities at Losberg and Dryden to
allow for further screening of the collected
product prior to processing. In the com-
pany’s process, 90% of what is collected is
usable and the remainder is disposed of as
per NORA-SA requirements and regulations.
Water and volatiles are removed during the
processing and the final product is a black,
Vaseline-like high energy fuel. This is used
by the company’s mining clients where 6%
is added to 94% of oxidiser (ammonium
nitrate) to form the explosives – hence the
cradle-to-cradle philosophy. The benefits
are obvious and significant. Many of the
mines across the continent are in remote
sites and the removal of old engine oil and
the importation of diesel may not necessar-
ily be as available or cost-effective.
It certainly is pleasing that the technology
has been refined adequately in South Africa
that used oil can be reprocessed into a new
product and returned to the original point
of generation, used as energy in mining
operations. It is as Anton Hanekom from
Plastics|SA said: “Recycling is about creat-
ing a new product from what was originally
a waste product.”
Recycling
2. PC and tablets1. PRINT 3. Smartphones
Promoting integrated resources management
OilKolLook out for the frog!
Sustainability megaforces
A complex, unpredictable system
Waste streams
Population increases and high waste costs
Shale gasEnvironmental and economic
risks
AsbestosAsbestiform
and the
“There is a major paradigm shift towards providing a sustainable one-stop solution for e-waste recycling.”
Malcolm Whitehouse, sales manager at Desco Electronic Recyclers
ThuM
“Thsu
M
is printed on 100% recycled paper
PG 6PG 66PG 6GP
Email your details to [email protected] to recieve a copy of
RêSource every quarter.
To recieve your digital copy of RêSource every quarter go to
www.3smags.co.za
WAYS TO RECIEVE
To recieve your digital copy of RêSource every quarter go to
www.3smags.co.za
This type of management ensures that once a product reaches the end of its lifespan, its component parts are recovered and reused
RéSource February 2013 – 25
Landfills
The new Vlakfontein waste treatment
site demonstrates the use of the latest
technology and is compliant with all the
relevant legislation. According to Stan Jewask-
iewitz of Envitech Solutions, the site design
consultants: “The entire facility has been de-
signed with the waste hierarchy in mind.”
Gauteng will now enjoy the benefits of a
truly world-class waste treatment facility
that will meet the needs of all stakehold-
ers. Customers and clients will receive good
service and have the comfort that their
waste streams are being handled appro-
priately, all regulatory requirements will be
met or exceeded, and the community will
be an active participant through a strong
ethos of conservation and environmental
best practice, job creation and partnership.
The site development plan at Vlakfontein
is extensive and the following facilities and
infrastructure will be included:
• The facility will have full access control
and up to four weighbridges to record not
only incoming but also outgoing vehicles
and their loads, including waste type and
volume by closed circuit television.
• Waste acceptance control will be of the
highest standard. These procedures are
critical to ensure that unac-
ceptable waste types do not
enter the site and that unex-
pected chemical reactions
are avoided. This is vital to
ensuring the safety and health
of not only the employees but also all
clients, other visitors, the community and
the environment.
• A fully compliant on-site laboratory will
be provided for the testing of hazardous
HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL
Vlakfontein: cutting-edge facilityThere are frequent reports of the illegal dumping of hazardous waste streams occurring
across South Africa. There is also a general shortage of disposal facilities for hazardous
waste and many existing facilities are not fully compliant. This status quo will now
change with a new hazardous treatment and disposal facility at Vlakfontein, Gauteng. By
Yanna Erasmus.
Gauteng will now enjoy the benefits of a truly world-class waste treatment facility that will meet the needs of all stakeholders
An aerial perspective of the site of the new cutting edge facility
26 – RéSource February 2013
Landfills
wastes to come into the site and well as
a quality management system.
• Secure parking, resting and ablution facili-
ties will be provided for the trucks and
their drivers delivering waste while testing
is undergone. Visiting truck drivers are
therefore also catered for.
• In line with government’s vision of reduc-
ing waste to landfill, the facility will have
a material recovery facility to ensure that
recyclables are removed through manual
and mechanical extraction methods.
• A treatment plant for liquid and other non-
standard waste streams will ensure that
classified waste is assessed and treated
accordingly to meet the new regulations
when they are promulgated. Further, it
is proposed to install a non-burn tech-
nology or hydroclave for the treatment
of approved healthcare risk wastes.
Jewaskiewitz states: “All processes will
be designed to the latest standards
and will meet all the latest air emission
requirements in terms of the National
Environmental Management: Air Quality
Act as well as the air quality standards as
published in Regulation 1210 of 2009.”
• The landfill facility will be operated
according to the legal requirement and
is lined according to a Class A contain-
ment barrier system – the new national
standard. This includes six liners along
with several compacted clay liners, a
leakage detection system and a leachate
collection system.
• A weather station will be installed to
monitor and record meteorological data,
which will determine operations as well
as potential emissions, and the site will
be fully fenced with guards and regular
patrols. Both ac0cess and on-site roads
will be designed to minimise the genera-
tion of dust and all gravel roads will be
wetted to ensure dust suppression.
ConservationThe site, around 200 ha in size, is situated
just north of Vereeniging. It is located on
the disused De Deur Brickworks premises
on the farm Vlakfontein. The site met the
relevant criteria as a brown field site due
to the substantial disturbance of the land
arising from deep excavations for clay mate-
rials, derelict brick kilns and the stockpiling
of brick wastes. Jewaskiewitz says: “The
development will enable the rehabilitation
of the existing site through properly engi-
neered landfill, closure and rehabilitation
procedures. Further to this there has been
a joint undertaking by Vlakfontein and the
community to develop the surrounding area
as a nature conservancy, which will now also
be fully fenced.”
As part of the greening of the site, unde-
veloped areas on the property will be plant-
ed with indigenous vegetation and stocked
with suitable game. The first phase will only
use 20 ha of the total area and the lifespan
of this phase is expected to be 20 years. It
will include the infrastructure and one cell
of the total seven cells that are planned.
Site preparation has already begun and it is
envisaged that construction will begin during
the first quarter of 2013 and be completed
towards the end of 2013.
Geology and hydrogeologyThe site can be broadly segmented into two
geological zones. The first is a dolerite geologi-
cal zone with portions where the dolerite intru-
sion has occurred and the second, a quartzite
zone where no intrusion of the dolerite has
occurred. The dolerite zone extends roughly
across the northern half of the site and, as
Jewaskiewitz says: “this comprises residual
and/or weathered Timeball Hill Formation
quartzite overlying residual dolerite clays with
weathered dolerite bedrock. This portion of
The landfill facility will be operated according to the legal requirement and is lined according to a Class A containment barrier system
LEFT The Vlakfontein site layout
28 – RéSource February 2013
Landfills
While ‘zero waste to landfill’ is an ultimate
goal for the country, facilities such as these
that accept hazardous and contaminated
waste are in short supply. The substantial
investment made by Vlakfontein will go a
long way in providing the country with a
world-class facility for the safe disposal of
this type of waste, whether by landfilling,
liquid treatment or hydroclave technologies.
This in turn, will assist in the reduction of
the illegal and dangerous dumping of toxic
waste products across our country and
improve the environment.
RéSource would like to thank Vlakfontein and
Envitech Solutions for making the research
and documentation into the development of
this world-class site available for print.
the site is technically ideal for the location of
this type of landfill.”
In terms of water specifications, the water
depths are between 10 and 30 m, the
groundwater flows in a north-westerly direc-
tion and the aquifer is classified as minor.
Regarding the potential for groundwater
contamination, the naturally occurring low-
permeability and residual clays at the site
will provide good attenuation and retardation
to any surface water infiltration.
In terms of leachate and stormwater man-
agement, a comprehensive plan was com-
piled with the site divided into sub-catchment
areas to delineate clean and dirty water sys-
tems. Leachate will be stored in a leachate
dam and pumped into a liquid waste treat-
ment plant. The final treated effluent will be
disposed of to a reed-bed system prior to
discharge to the environment, meeting the
highest effluent discharge standards.
MonitoringVlakfontein has a comprehensive monitoring
plan that will not only verify that the facility
conforms to the required standards and site
specific licence conditions, but will also use
the data that is collected to effectively man-
age the potential effects that the facility could
have on the environment. Monitoring will also
ensure that the site design, implementation
and operation controls are adequate and
provide information for future planning and
prioritisation. The comprehensive monitoring
plan will allow quality- and risk assessment
and the implementation of appropriate risk
management measures.
Vlakfontein has a comprehensive monitoring plan that will verify that the facility conforms to the required standards and site specific licence condition
RIGHT A class A barrier system
RéSource February 2013 – 29
Landfills
The paper was presented by Burkard
Lenze of Naue in Germany, one of
the authors, and was co-authored by
K Werth from Bauberatung Geokunststoffe,
also in Germany. They say: “It is essential
that the long-term internal strength and fric-
tion to adjacent components are defined un-
der realistic stress conditions.”
Geosynthetic clay liners (GCL) are com-
posites of bentonite and geotextiles, and
are used as a hydraulic barrier in sealing
applications, most commonly as a bar-
rier element in landfill caps and covers.
Used either in combination with other
liners, they function to inhibit the flow of
precipitation into the landfill as well as pre-
venting the escape of gas into the environ-
ment. Needle-punched GCLs are reinforced
composites that combine two durable geo-
textile outer layers and a uniform core of
highly absorbent sodium bentonite clay
to form a hydraulic barrier. These are an
important trend toward the combined use
of geosynthetics and clay materials as the
low hydrated internal friction angle of the
bentonite alone is overcome by the needle
punching of all components creating a uni-
form shear stress transmitting GCL.
The authors state: “The long-term shear
behaviour of GCLs is important on slopes.
The cover soil over the GCL permanently
imposes a combined compression and
shear stress, and thus the stability of
the slope in the overall capping strong-
ly depends on the shear behaviour of
the different materials in such a system
– both internally and on the inter face.”
During the 1990s, the Federal Institute for
Materials Research and Testing, known as
BAM (Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung
und –prüfung), developed a methodolo-
gy to study the internal long-term shear
behaviour of geomembranes with friction
services. They succeeded to estimate the
long-term behaviour of these membranes
under typical landfill cap confining stresses
and slope inclinations. In 2000, Naue
Testing GCL shear strengthThe stability of landfi ll barrier systems is critical as there is no point in engineering a site
and spending millions on compliance when the integrity of the liners is not adequate. A
paper on developments of testing the long-term internal shear strength of geosynthetic
clay liners in Europe was presented at WasteCon 2012.
FIGURE 1 LEFT Installation of a GCL on a steep landfill slope (Pochsandhalde, Germany)RIGHT Idealised solid waste cap with various geosynthetic componentsFIGURE 2 LEFT Schematic view of a test equipment used to determine long-term shear strength RIGHT View of test device
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
30 – RéSource February 2013
joined BAM to develop the methodology
further for application on GCLs allowing
for the measurement of time to failure at
high temperature and in different liquids,
as well as creep performance. The results
of these tests allow for the estimation of
service lifetimes of these membranes.
The testing was also expanded to use of
long-term shear testing of geosynthetic
drainage mats.
TestingIn the long-term shear strength test, GCLs
were tested at a maximum temperature of
80˚C with standard tap water. For landfill
caps and covers, the standard tests ran
with a 21.8-degree slope and a maximum
load of 50 kPa, representing a cover soil
load of 2.5 m. The time of failure was
used to extrapolate the service life of the
selected conditions. During the procedure,
a GCL specimen (around 12 x 13 cm) was
sandwiched between two steel wedges. The
carrier and cover geotextile were bonded to
the respective wedge by hooking them to
friction partners that were fixed to the upper
and lower wedges. A textured geomembrane
or metal food grate was used as friction part-
ners. Using a lever mechanism, the upper
wedge was subjected to 50 kN per square
metres, comparable to the weight of 2.5 m
of soil, in a heated water bath. Displacement
sensors recorded vertical displacement over
a period of time. The use of tap water also
simulated realistic site conditions.
“Based on decades of experience in long-
term geomembrane testing, BAM deter-
mined that a GCL must pass a minimum
failure time of 365 days under a 50 kPa
load at a 21.8-degree(2.5:1) slope and in
80˚C water, to allow the conclusion that
the product has a long-term realistic shear
strength for 200 years for a landfill cap with
a metre of soil as the confining stress and
a maximum slope inclination of 3:1.”
BAM and Naue tested both standard and
specially produced GCLs of which the main
differences were in the anchoring length
and the strength of the needle-punched
fibres. In addition, five polypropylene types
and stabiliser packages were used. All
GCLs were needle-punched and some had
the patented Thermal Lock treatment.
Woven and non-woven carrier layers were
also included in the tests.
ResultsAll the products were tested under tem-
peratures of 40˚C, 60˚C and 80˚C. According
to the authors: “A shear failure was not
observed in any of the cases even after
a test duration of up to 1 350 days, tak-
ing a permanent normal load of 50 kPa
and permanent shear stress of 20 kPa
(due to the slope angle of 21.8 degrees)
into account. GCLs manufactured with high-
density polyethylene achieved slope failure
in a shorter time frame in some cases, but
this was not investigated further because
nearly all standard GCLs are manufactured
from polypropylene.
In summary: “Long-term shear strength of
GCLs was tested in tap water and simulat-
ed field conditions. After a three-year test
duration, the dismantled specimens were
completely intact by appearance and long-
term shear strength tests were used to
demonstrate the excellent long-term shear
per formance of the Thermal Lock treated
GCLs and GCLs with non-woven/woven
composite barrier layers. Additionally,
FIGURE 3 Design basis on interface for cap lining systems against sliding on slopes
It is essential that the long-term internal strength and friction to adjacent components are defined under realistic stress conditions
RéSource February 2013 – 31
Responsible CareAn initiative of the Chemical Industry
Landfills
testing on the geosynthetic components
alone showed how important stabilisation
packages are. However, in general the com-
ponents of the GCL did not meet the GRI-
GCL-s specifications, which are considered
to be minimum specification values.
The authors concluded that for landfill cap
stability, calculations against sliding inter-
face friction between geosynthetic compo-
nents as well as between geosynthetics
and soils need to be verified in shear box
tests. Based on comprehensive experi-
ence gained from more than 800 shear
box tests, the authors concluded that in
inter face investigations, results will vary
between laboratories; that difference sam-
ple sizes and operations will cause differ-
ing results; that bottom and top sides need
to be considered; using results for stability
calculations must be done with caution and
in most cases, inter face friction against
top or cover soils may be decisive.
This is an abridged version of ‘Landfill Covers
with Steep Slopes: Requirements of long-
term internal shear strength of Geosynthetic
Clay Liners’ as presented at WasteCon
2012 in East London. For a copy of the full
paper as well as references, please contact
Burkard Lenze at [email protected].
FIGURE 4 Interface friction between geosynthetics and between geosynthetics and soils for cap lining systems
32 – RéSource February 2013
Air pollution
Environmental taxes are viewed as a
mechanism to encourage responsible envi-
ronmental practice and to mitigate the nega-
tive impacts economic activity has on the
environment. To achieve this within an eco-
nomic or business environment, Mandy said
that market-based instruments are gener-
ally viewed as the most efficient and likely
to result in least-cost abatement. However,
this must be combined with complemen-
tary regulatory measures. Market-based
instruments comply with the polluter-pays
principle by imposing the cost of pollution
on the polluter, whereas subsidies result
in paying a polluter not to pollute and are
only appropriate in conjunction with other
instruments. Mandy explained that carbon
tax and tradable permits are both market-
based instruments; however, the latter is
not generally viewed as “appropriate for
South Africa”.
Guiding principlesHow would such a tax be structured? Mandy
highlighted that there are issues of horizontal
or vertical equity, whereby those who can
most afford to pay, pay more than those who
can least afford to pay and those in an equal
position pay the same amount. The matters
of certainty in being able to determine the
tax liability and of course simplicity are vital
considerations, along with administration and
compliance costs. The environmental effec-
tiveness of these types of taxes is probably
the most important tenet. The use of the
actual revenue is also a matter that must be
resolved. Complementary measures and the
impacts of the competitiveness of companies
must also be considered. Thus, commented
Mandy: “We are nowhere near yet and carbon
tax is likely to be implemented only in the
next three years.”
Current environmental taxesMandy summarised the current environmen-
tal taxes in place in South Africa and how
effective they have been. The plastic bag
levy – introduced in June 2004 at three
cents a bag and since July 2009 at four
cents a bag – brings in around R150 million
in revenue, but the recycling initiatives that
were introduced were a failure. had it not
EMISSIONS MANAGEMENT
Unpacking carbon tax in SAExperts in the fi eld agree: carbon tax is coming, possibly
this fi nancial year or the next, and companies must
ready themselves for this extra burden. But what will it
entail and how ready is Treasury for implementation?
Kyle Mandy, partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers,
examined these issues at a recent RéSource seminar.
Yanna Erasmus reports.
National Treasury has stated its inten-
tion to increase the contribution of
environmental taxes and levies to
total tax revenues. Mandy said: “The imple-
mentation of this policy commenced with the
introduction of the electricity levy in 2009 and
continues with numerous environmental taxes
at a national level having been introduced
since then. In 2009, environmental taxes con-
tributed R26.4 billion, around 4.2%, to total
tax revenues and in 2013 it is expected to
contribute R61.6 billion, some 7.4%.”
CLEAN POWER LARGE POWER USERS
INVESTMENT & FINANCE
T&D /SMART GRIDS
GENERATIONMETERING WATER
14 – 15 May 2013, Cape Town, South Africa
Pre-conference workshops: 13 May 2013 | Site visits: 16 May 2013 @AfricaUtilities
African Power Forum
Follow us:
www.african-utility-week.com
90% of all waste water world-wide remains untreated
Realise the value of recycled waste water and appropriate resource management for your business, increase your returns by as much as 10% and optimise your water and power usage by attending Africa’s number 1 utilities exhibition, attend free technical water workshops and network with 250 solution providers.
Download the programme brochure from our website.
How would you like to plan to manage your water resources for maximum efficiency?
13TH ANNUAL
Host utility: Host city: Media partner:
Co-located:
Exhibition: Free entry if you pre-register. Save R290.Conference: Save 30% if you register by 3 March 2013. Limited seats available. Quote sales code RES01.
34 – RéSource February 2013
been for the accompanying regulations on
minimum thickness of plastic bags and the
agreement with large retailers to charge for
these, the environmental effect would likely
have been nil. The electricity levy now stands
at 3.5 cents per kWh and will contribute
some R8.6 billion to tax revenues by the
end of the 2012/13 financial year. However,
none of this money has been applied to envi-
ronmental objectives. Filament lamp levies
are currently at R3 a lamp and contribute
R105 million, also with no environmental
application. Finally, there is the environ-
mental levy on carbon dioxide emissions of
motor vehicles. Introduced on 1 September
2010 to passenger vehicles and extended to
double cab pick-ups on 1 March 2011, the
tax is calculated on emissions as per test
report or proxy based on engine capacity.
The revenue stands at R1.6 billion. This is,
in essence, a carbon tax on potential emis-
sions. The implementation of carbon tax,
however, can potentially have a duplicating
effect on this tax.
The carbon tax proposalAnnounced in the 2012 budget by finance
minister Pravin Gordhan, a phased approach
has been suggested. The first phase, from
2013/14 to 2019/20, suggests taxes to
be levied on actual emissions. The design
features of this phase include a percentage-
based exemption threshold at 60%, set
higher for certain process emissions and
trade exposed sectors. The rate has been
suggested at R120 per tonne of carbon
dioxide emissions above the said thresh-
olds. Offsets are allowed up to a maximum
of 10% and there is also the possibility of
additional relief for reduced carbon intensity.
Revenues currently have not
been earmarked, but there is
the possibility of some of this
being directed to environmental
spend. Thresholds are to be
reduced in Phase 2 (from 2020
to 2025) and following this, absolute emis-
sions thresholds may be possible.
As mentioned, a 60% threshold has been
set for the country’s sectors in the first
phase. However, this threshold can be
increased or decreased for relative carbon
intensity and will be measured at the end
of the year. This removes the element of
certainty and knowing your liability, which
is so essential in taxation. The overall
tax-free threshold is to be capped at 90%
of emissions.
Trade exposure relief currently stands at
10%, but it is not certain whether this is
enough. There are difficulties in classifica-
tion of firms into sectors as well as the
distinction within the given sectors. In addi-
tion – and this may be the most difficult
challenge of them all – there are complex
interactions between electricity and the
other sectors.
According to Mandy, the core concerns on
the latest tax proposal include “whether the
tax is to be levied on all emitters or only the
large emitters, the possible lack of relief for
consumers from tax on scope two or indi-
rect emissions, the lack of border adjust-
ments on imports and tax neutrality, the
absence of mitigation agreement provisions
and the lack of consideration of structural
issues in the energy sector, particularly
with regards to electricity”.
In his conclusion, Mandy listed possi-
ble future environmental taxes that may
become a reality in South Africa. These
include wastewater discharge levies, air
pollution charges, levies on waste products,
landfill taxes, traffic congestion charges,
motor vehicle licence fees and a review of
taxation of transport fuels based on environ-
mental impact and energy content.
As can be seen, it is clear that a lot of work
must still be done before carbon tax can
efficiently be introduced into South Africa.
While the red tape and structure thereof
must still be hashed out, so to speak, this
is not a measure to be ignored. Unless tan-
gible long-term plans to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions become part and parcel of
industry across the world, the effects will
prove to be disastrous on the climate and,
consequently, economics. The global carbon
market is central towards this shift because
money talks and drives change.
Readers interested in more informa-
tion can contact Kyle Mandy and
PricewaterhouseCoopers at +27 (0)11 797
4977 or e-mail [email protected].
The implementation of carbon tax, however, can potentially have a duplicating effect...
Air pollution
The Health Care Waste Summit & Expo 2013: 15,16 & 17 May 2013
Emperor’s Palace Johannesburg
Contact us for more informationFor more information or to enquire about participation and partnership opportunities, please
email André Snyman at [email protected] or call +27(0) 83 44 88 233We look forward to seeing you there!
Greetings, The Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa
The Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA) is proud to announce that we will be hosting the 3rd Biennial Health Care Waste Summit & Expo from 15 to 17 May 2013 at Emperor’s Palace, Johannesburg South Africa.
This interactive summit and Expo will be the 3rd in a series of successful events as hosted by the Health Care Waste Forum (HCWF) of the IWMSA. With the Southern African HCW industry still experiencing disorder after a number of dramatic news reports of unlawful disposal and dumping, the time has come
once again to pull together all industry stakeholders and participants to address to most crucial issues that affect the professional delivery of services within this
sector of waste management in Southern Africa.
With government and the private sector actively participating in the event over the past years, the event series surely provides the potential to create the best networking and benchmarking opportunity for this industry sector on the African continent. In addition, the event is also perfectly timed based on the industry’s
event calendar.
The Health Care Waste Summit & Expo 2013 is more than just a conference; it is a high-level meeting place of the largest leaders, experts and decision-makers in the industry to design business models and to ensure pro table implementation and adherence to regulation over a short span of time. It is
a stimulating conference experience with interactive panel discussions, case studies of successful medical waste solutions and facilitated open panel
sessions for you to debate and deliberate the issues you are facing.
Theme and Call for Papers for 2013
In respect to the growing demand for information in both strategic
and practical spheres of the health care waste management industry,
the conference for 2013 will spread some light on the adherence and
compliance to regulation and legislation as well as focusing on best practice strategies for
implementation in the treatment and disposal of medical waste.
The theme for this far-reaching forum is: “Uniting Through a
Shared Medical and Environmental Responsibility”. Transportation,
technologies for incineration, The Waste Act, disposal, awareness
creation and best practice service delivery will be amongst the variety of the attention-grabbing topics that
delegates can look forward to.
Even more!The Health Care Waste Summit & Expo 2013 provides an industry wide platform for service providers and health are waste generators to meet and develop new markets. Medical waste generators, service providers, transporters, manufacturers, distributors, users of treatment technologies, equipment providers, legislators, enforcement representatives, consultants, and advisors are but to name a few of the delegate composition within this successful event series.
The Health Care Waste Summit & Expo 2013 will host a limited exhibition area details of which will be distributed later.
In respect to dates and further communication based on the call for papers, conference program and exhibition layout, please look out for us online as we will be communicating all these in due time.
36 – RéSource February 2013
Air pollution
What do you view as the current aim of carbon tax?Undoubtedly, carbon has become the catch-
word for all greenhouse gases. The underlying
aim of a carbon tax is the development and
creation of cleaner (i.e. carbon-clean) energy
that supports sustained economic demands
and growth.
While there are the ‘doom-mongers’ who
are opposed to the carbon tax, anyone
who has been involved in an ‘every kilowatt
saving counts’ mindset of energy-efficiency
projects and carbon projects – specifically
carbon-energy projects that have gone the
extra distance to produce energy, for exam-
ple landfill gas-to-electricity, cogeneration
projects, etc. – over the past decade are
prepared for the new business climate
under carbon tax.
Over the past decade, SLR Consulting
has been involved with the real-dealers of
the lower carbon energy economy with the
development of projects such as landfill gas
to electricity, furnace waste gas-to-electricity
with cogeneration, and biomass anaerobic
digestion biogas to energy.
Why should the focus of carbon tax shift?It is not taking into account two crucial aspects:
first, certain intensive energy users are not
being held accountable; and second, benefits
for voluntary actions – both past and going
forward. It is the latter that has stimulated
the carbon-energy market internationally and
is set to dra matically expand from its current
lowly 2% of international participation showing.
Why is there a focus on a lower carbon energy and economy?How real is the
combatting of
climate change by reducing greenhouse gas
emissions? How real is the contribution of
South Africans going to be? The answers
to these tough questions give us the key
reasons to embrace lower carbon energy and
economy. With good focus, we can achieve
a lower carbon energy provision to South
African energy users and, crucially for a coun-
try that is indeed still developing sustainably,
achieve a profitable economy around the task
of achieving this goal.
How realistic is this goal?We are unfortunately quite far away. One
has only to notice the drop-off in interest of
carbon energy and/or Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM) projects when the car-
bon price drops, the process appears too
difficult or a market (i.e. the European
Union Emissions Trading System) falls away.
The carbon tax is a useful mechanism to
get all South Africans involved around a
common cause: highlighting the demand for
low carbon energy.
Why should carbon tax not be a source of funding?The action should inherently be voluntary. This
must be clearly understood and is the founda-
tion of the carbon economy internationally. In
this way, the doers will gain and the talkers
won’t, although there should be financial
gains made by those who contribute success-
fully to the provision of a low carbon energy.
Globally, how are governments reacting?The reaction is slow, with uncertainty, arro-
gance, and ignorance too – specifically on
contributions towards developing low-carbon-
energy projects and economy. South Africa
and Africa have a significant part to play in the
carbon economy by ensuring that future devel-
opment is low-carbon development. While
slow to come on board, South Africa and
Africa as a whole can still take a bold step
into the carbon economy.
Carbon tax complexitiesLindsay Strachan of SLR Consulting is a strong believer that the underlying aim of a
carbon tax is the development and creation of cleaner energy that supports sustained
economic demands and growth. RéSource recently interviewed Strachan on the
complexities of carbon tax in the South African context.
Tony Stalberg, project technical manager/designer at SA Calcium Carbide, and Lindsay Strachan, project manager at SLR Consulting, at the start-up of the gas engines that are fed from furnace waste gas that was previously unused and flared
A FIRST LOW-CARBON ENERGY – COGENERATION PROJECT GETS UNDER WAYThe SA Calcium Carbide furnace waste gas to electricity cogeneration project was constructed and commissioned by December 2012. This project is an example of a low-carbon-energy project stimulated by a low-carbon economy and South Africa’s goals for sustainable development needs. The 8 MW project’s key objectives are:• energy security to support industrial
growth requirements – reduced by the current energy availability and overall cost of supply
• use of waste fuel-gas and cogeneration – using exhaust heat
• realisation of carbon emission/greenhouse gas emission reductions by developing a CDM project.
SA Calcium Carbide is located in Newcastle, KwaZulu-Natal, and has, with SLR (originally
GreenEng) as their appointed project manager, developed an 8 MW capacity electricity generation capacity cogeneration project utilising their furnace waste off-gas. The power produced displaces existing Eskom fossil-fuel-derived electricity and exhaust heat is used in the aggregates drying kiln replacing LPG gas. SLR also project managed the successful registration of the project as a Clean Development Mechanism initiative – registered by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
The project is termed as a ‘green energy’ project owed to the realisation of significant reductions in harmful greenhouse gas emissions; registered with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; reducing the use of fossil-fuel fired electricity; using previous waste gas as a fuel source; and providing cogeneration with the use of exhaust heat for SA Calcium Carbide’s processes.
A view of the GE-Jenbacher 620 gas engine gen-set. The bank of 10 cylinder heads on the one side is clearly shown
38 – RéSource February 2013
Advertorial
This significant feat is in recognition of
the innovative practices undertaken by
this Jeffreys Bay clay brick manufactur-
er to minimise its impact on the environment,
by means of transforming waste tyres into a
fuel resource for drying, in addition to contrib-
uting toward energy efficiency, air quality and
climate change through the successful instal-
lation of the SA-VSBK brick-firing technology,
almost a year ago.
The awards were issued by the head of the
Department of Economic Development and
Environmental Affairs, Bulumko Nelana,
and the president of the IWMSA, Deidré
Nxumalo-Freeman. First Place in the Bronze
Award Category, ‘Small Organisation with
High Environmental Impact’, went to fam-
ily-owned Langkloof Bricks, which also
scooped the overall Innovation Award for
its technical input in this sphere. The
awards were issued at a glittering gala din-
ner, held at the East London International
Convention Centre as part of the IWMSA’s
biennial conference, WasteCon 2012.
Commenting on behalf of the Blake family,
executive director of Langkloof Bricks, Nico
Blake said: “We were not expecting any
form of recognition. However, these acco-
lades prove that we are on track with our
waste management systems, in addition to
using energy-efficient manufacturing meth-
odologies, like the SA-VSBK as an integral
part of our production processes.”
The SA-VSBK is a continuous updraught
kiln that reduces energy consumption dur-
ing the brick-firing process by as much as
Langkloof Bricks wins two Top Green AwardsLangkloof Bricks, pioneers of the energy-effi cient Vertical Shaft Brick Kiln technology
in South Africa (SA-VSBK), has garnered two coveted Eastern Cape Top Green Awards
from the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA), in association with
the provincial Department of Economic Development and Environmental Affairs.
RéSource February 2013 – 39
Advertorial
50%, resulting in dramatically reduced car-
bon emissions, fuel consumption, manufac-
turing costs and exceptionally low breakage
percentages. The technology was brought
into South Africa under the auspices of the
SA-VSBK Project over a year ago, as part
of the Swiss government’s Climate Change
Mitigation Programme to reduce carbon
emissions globally.
Langkloof Bricks is the first clay brick
manufacturer in this country to participate
in this open source technology initiative,
which has been made available through
the Swiss Agency for Development and
Cooperation (SDC), with the implementa-
tion undertaken by Swisscontact (Swiss
Foundation for Technical Cooperation)
and Skat (Swiss Resource Centre and
Consultancies for Development), which in
turn consulted with a team of local experts
in the field of clay brick manufacturing.
The aim of the Top Green Organisation
Awards programme is to promote and
recognise responsible environmental man-
agement practices of organisations in the
Eastern Cape while also fostering better
relationships between government, indus-
try, business and other organisations.
The judging process entailed stringent
site audits by a team of waste, air quality,
climate change, environmental and safety
specialists. While each company was meas-
ured against the same criteria, points were
issued according to the size of the organi-
sation and its commitment to minimising its
environmental impact. “Jez Rowe of Rowe
Construction must also be acknowledged
as he was instrumental in the redesign and
construction of these shafts, so much that
we can now proudly proclaim the SA-VSBK’s
to be a fully fledged South African design,”
said Blake.
ABOVE Peter (left) and Nico Blake with their award. Jez Rowe is seen behind
These accolades prove that we are on track with our waste management systems.” Nico Blake, executive director of Langkloof Bricks
40 – RéSource February 2013
Hazardous waste
W hile there are no official figures
available, it is not rocket science
to figure out that there are thou-
sands of companion animal carcasses that
are not incinerated by owners that must be
disposed of in South Africa every year. A con-
tractor that landfills animals in Cape Town
estimates that around 2 000 carcasses are
landfilled monthly in that city. This excludes
those animals that die or are euthanised at
veterinarians in the city. These animals, in-
cluding those from veterinarians, which are
not incinerated, are placed in special dispos-
al bags and are taken to landfill. According to
Jones: “The sizes of animals also vary greatly
from 60 kg Rottweilers to 200 g puppies or
kittens. The City of Cape Town is also landfill-
ing whales and seals that are washed up on
the beaches.”
This may still be a novel concept in
South Africa, but in both Canada and the
US, road-killed wild animals have been
composted for some time. According to an
article published in BioCycle in November
2006, over 25 000 deer are
killed on New
York State
highways every year, in addition to like
raccoons, coyotes and foxes. Pioneered
by Cornell University’s Waste Management
Institute in the early 2000s, these animals
have been composted in various ways
including static pile composting with wood
chips. This has been rather successful as
the temperatures achieved in the piles is
sustained long enough and is high enough
to generally kill the pathogens present.
More research is being done into this
issue by the university. Pennsylvania State
University has also per formed its own
research and both institutions have worked
out a basic and relatively simple procedure.
They advise that a well-drained site at
least 200 feet from a water source is ideal.
Woodchips and sawdust is then spread out
in a windrow format, around five to seven
feet wide. The animal is then placed on
the sawdust in the centre of the row. One
foot of sawdust is then placed
between each
animal and the next is then layered until
the pile is around six feet high. A two-foot
cover of sawdust or compost is then placed
on top. After three to five months the pile
can be turned. A 25:1 ratio of sawdust to
animal (carbon to nitrogen) is ideal. If the
pile becomes too wet, more sawdust and
woodchips must be added.
This sounds rather sim-
ple, but the quest to
divert companion
animal car-
casses
Dr Melanie Jones, a veterinarian based in Cape Town and founder of Zero to Landfi ll
Organics, is running a trial on the composting of companion animal carcasses that are
currently being taken to landfi ll. These carcasses become hazardous waste, particularly
when infectious, which in turn is also the challenge to the possibility of composting.
Yanna Erasmus investigates.
DIVERSION OF WASTE TO LANDFILL
Novel approach to carcass disposal
ABOVE A single heapBELOW Mortality composting in bins
RéSource February 2013 – 41
Hazardous waste
from landfill is far more complicated, par-
ticularly in South Africa. By far, the bulk
of companion animals that are landfilled
are unwanted and uncared for. Hence, the
presence of parvo and distemper viruses
is commonplace and bacteria such as
Salmonella and E. coli must also be elimi-
nated. Jones adds helminth eggs and the
breakdown of pentobarbitone, the drug
used to euthanise the animal, to this list.
Jones has been running a small-scale trial
in Cape Town. “Regarding our trial, the first
animals that were composted have been
reduced to bones and hair. There is very lit-
tle flesh left and odour is minimal when the
heap is opened. We are still experimenting
with different carbon sources – wood chips,
garden refuse and sawdust, for example.
In light of this,
RéSource spoke with
Kobus Otto of Kobus
Otto & Associates, an
expert in healthcare
waste, based in
Kempton Park.
How do these remains affect water courses/resources?There is a risk of surface- and
groundwater pollution in the
event of the mortal remains
being infectious. A risk assess-
ment is therefore required in all
instances where such remains
are not incinerated or disposed
of on legally compliant landfills.
Persistent viruses such as distemper and parvo virus are prevalent in South Africa with unwanted pets. In your opinion, are these very dangerous for our environment and how?Persistent viruses can result
in animal anatomical waste
being infectious. Animals from
road-kill incidents are in most
instances not well-maintained
and inoculated pets, but are
stray animals that are not
looked after by their owners.
Well-cared for pets also get
killed on roads, but most pets
killed on roads are in the vicin-
ity of low-income residential
areas. It is not viable to test
any remains from animals
killed on roads to determine
whether the remains are infect-
ed with any diseases or not.
As an expert, are you concerned about the high number of euthanised pets that are wrapped in black bags and being disposed of in landfills? No. I see safe disposal of
euthanised pets on legally com-
pliant landfills as an environ-
mentally sound way of reducing
the spread of infections from
such animals. With the upcom-
ing standards for emissions
from incinerators being very
high, the costs associated
with incineration of unwanted
pet carcasses is very high and
not affordable to the major-
ity of people in South Africa.
This is recognised by the Draft
Standards for Disposal of
Waste to Landfill that specifi-
cally provide for the disposal
of non-infectious animal car-
casses to Class B landfills.
There are, however, certain
procedures to be followed
for disposal of non-infectious
animal carcasses to ensure
that they are not exposed on
the surface where they can
spread diseases (that may not
have been detected) or create
nuisances like odours, vectors
or rodents. Animal carcasses
arriving on-site should either be
disposed of in trenches exca-
vated into the waste before
being covered with waste, or
alternatively be disposed of at
the toe of the waste disposal
working face, with the very next
waste load being disposed
of on top of the carcasses
before the waste is compacted
and covered with soil as
part of the standard landfill
operations procedures.
Any personal thoughts you would like to share?My personal view is that there
is vast amounts of organic
waste currently still disposed
of on landfills that can be
recovered for composting
before we need to go the
route of composting animal
remains. If it is a matter of
finding a means of disposing
of animal remains, the draft
HCRW Regulations makes
provision for the incineration of
infectious animal carcasses,
while the draft Standards for
Disposal of Waste to Landfill
provides for the disposal of
uninfected carcasses. Should
infected carcases accidentally
arrive on a landfill, the proce-
dure for proper disposal of the
carcasses together with the
comprehensive landfill lining
system will limit the potential
risk to the environment.
Some experts in the waste
industry agree. Most spoken
to are of the opinion that
there would be resistance
from animal rights groups
to mortality composting with
companion animal carcasses
and that the market for the
compost would have to be
industrial as opposed to
the private consumer. In the
absence of mass incineration,
which is becoming more and
more expensive, responsi-
ble landfilling remains the
best option. In the absence
of subsidised incineration
options and with a focus of
the diversion of waste from
landfill, composting of animal
remains can be viable, if
good management practices
are applied.
We have divided the animals into differ-
ent heaps to see what the best method of
composting is. Due to the large amount of
leachate the second heap has been built on
plastic sheeting with sawdust around the
edges to soak up the leachate.
“I have been talking to UCT and the toxi-
cology department at Onderstepoort about
the testing of both the soil under the com-
post heap and the compost heap itself for
drug residues. The trial is very small at the
moment and ideally we would like to change
RIGHT The start of a compost heap; this one in California
42 – RéSource February 2013
to in-vessel composting once we can prove
that the drug residue and pathogens will
not be a problem and we can scale up the
volumes. Unfortunately, all the studies I
have found from overseas are based on
livestock or animals killed on roads as
they don’t have South Africa’s problem of
thousands of unwanted or diseased dogs
and cats that are euthanised every year, so
this study seems to be unique in the fact
that companion animals are being com-
posted. I am busy preparing a paper on our
processes to document our findings and
results; I’m not sure how long it will take
to get the process right and determine the
optimal composting conditions.”
In a study performed by Cornell on the
decay rate of drugs including pentobarbital,
a comparison was made between burial and
composting. In both cases, the drug had
fully decayed by three months, although
with the composting site it was picked up in
the leachate. The conclusion, however, is:
“When done properly, mortality composting
protects ground- and surface water and
composting of euthanised livestock appears
to break down pentobarbital and phenylbuta-
zone, thus rendering the finished product
safe for wildlife and domestic use.”
Best practice, as listed by Cornell, include
that carcasses must be added in a timely
fashion with lumens lanced; the piles must
be well shaped, neat and not too big; and
that ground- and surface water protection
are paramount. The latter can be achieved
by using compost berms, filter strips, diver-
sion berms, collection lagoons and tanks,
and keeping the site mowed and clean.
Expert opinionThe National Draft Healthcare Risk Waste
(HCRW) Management Regulations state
that no person may treat anatomical and
isolation waste in a technology other
than incineration.
Anatomical waste also includes
“deceased animals or animal parts infected
with zoonotic diseases and includes an ani-
mal kept at a laboratory for the purposes of
biological or scientific research and testing,
but excludes human teeth, hair and nails,
and animal carcasses regulated by the
Animal Health Act (Act No 7 of 2002)”.
RIGHT Private mortality composting in the US
Hazardous waste
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY FOR FREE
LIKE INFRASTRUCTURE NEWS ON FACEBOOK
Have your say or get the conversation started about anything and everything related to the infrastructure and service delivery industries.
The @infrastructure4 tweets will keep you updated on all the latest, exciting and, of course, interesting happenings in the infrastructure and service delivery industries.
STAY IN TOUCH A weekly newsletter keeps you up to date
Sign up online for our FREE weekly newsletter and get an instant summary of the latest news, events and developments in the infrastructure and service delivery industries.
VISIT www.infrastructurene.ws TODAY
Scan here to go to website
Infrastructurene.ws brings together the communities from our three magazines – IMIESA, Water&Sanitation Africa and ReSource. It is a leading news hub, with in-depth articles, videos and podcasts, an events calendar, and full social media functionality.
BE PART OF THE FUTURE. MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!
46 – RéSource February 2013
Plastics conference
Aptly entitled ‘Plastics: The Future
for Growth’, this one-day confer-
ence will take place on Wednesday,
13 March 2013 and promises to be one of
the highlights of this year’s Pro-Plas Confer-
ence at the Nasrec Exhibition Centre, south
of Johannesburg.
“We are very excited about hosting a
conference that will create a platform for
open dialogue, the sharing of ideas and
soliciting of various opinions on issues that
affect our industry,” says Anton Hanekom,
Plastics|SA’s executive director.
“We have deliberately tried to move away
from the traditional approach to confer-
ences. Instead of the regular speakers
addressing audiences on old topics, we
will be having three lively debates, during
Plastics conference to address industry issuesThe South African plastics industry will be debating
various issues that impact on its growth and future
prospects with the fi rst ever industry-specifi c conference,
hosted by Plastics|SA.
which well known, investigative journalists
will lead a panel of experts in discussions.
Thanks to the use of technology, delegates
will be able to influence the discussions
taking place on the stage by electronically
sending their questions and comments to
the moderator, or by voting on issues being
discussed in real-time,” Hanekom explains.
The conference will consist of the follow-
ing exciting line-up:
• Opening keynote address by Dr
Wilfried Haensel, executive direc-
tor of PlasticsEurope, sponsored by
Engen Petroleum.
• Debate 1: “Growing the South African
Plastics Industr y”, sponsored by
Sasol Polymers and moderated by
Freek Robinson.
‘PLASTICS: THE FUTURE FOR GROWTH’
• Lunch, sponsored by Safripol.
• Debate 2: “What impacts on plastics pack-
aging?”, sponsored by Polyoak Packaging
and moderated by Jeremy Maggs.
• Debate 3: “Are plastics sustainable?”,
sponsored by PETCO and moderated by
Ruda Landman.
• Cocktail function and awards ceremony,
sponsored by ColorMatrix, a subsidiary of
PolyOne Corporation.
According to Hanekom, industry experts rep-
resenting diverse points of view have been
invited to be part of the panel of four and
will lead each discussion. “It is important
that everyone has the opportunity to share
their point of view and discuss pertinent
issues and this innovative way of interact-
ing will certainly facilitate that. Part of the
excitement is that we have no idea where
the discussions may lead. While we may not
necessarily resolve all the issues at hand,
we will be talking about it and encouraging
open dialogue with a mutual respect and
passion for issues that form the heartbeat
of our industry,” he says.
Entrance to the conference will cost
R650.00 per person for members of
Plastics|SA and R800.00 for non-members.
This price includes VAT, two tea and cof-
fee breaks, lunch and attendance to the
cocktail function and awards ceremony
that evening.
Hanekom says that registrations are
already under way and can be done online
at www.plasticsinfo.co.za. “We are expect-
ing close to 300 people and would encour-
age people to book and pay in advance in
order to avoid disappointment.”
For more information, contact:
Monya Vermaak
Marketing & communications executive:
Plastics|SA
Tel: +27 (0)11 653 4787 or
Monique Holtzhausen
AiM Marketing & Communications
Consultants
Tel: +27 (0)21 531 0313
RéSource February 2013 – 47
Health care waste
The World Health Organisation (WHO)
says that about 80% of the total amount
of waste generated by health care ac-
tivities across the world is general waste, with
the remainder being classified as hazardous.
Of this 20%, some 15% can be considered
infectious and anatomical in nature. Sharps
represent some 1%, but are the world’s major
source of disease transmission. Chemicals
and pharmaceuticals account for about 3% of
waste from health- activities while genotoxic
waste, radioactive matter and heavy metal
content account for around 1% of the total
health care waste.
The amount of waste generated per hos-
pital bed varies greatly across the world.
According to the WHO, high-income coun-
tries generate on average up to 0.5 kg of
hazardous waste per bed per day, while
low-income countries generate on aver-
age 0.2 kg of hazardous waste per hos-
pital bed per day. Research performed by
Ghassan Obid, a senior waste manage-
ment expert in Germany, and published on
Waste Management World, provides a little
more detail.
In Beijing, the average is 0.15 kg while
in Germany it stands around 0.05 kg for
a municipal hospital. Thailand produces
around 0.23 kg and hospitals in Bogotá,
Colombia, produce 1.2 kg daily. The primary
challenge, however, comes in when health
care waste is not sorted as it should be and
hazardous waste is disposed of along with
general waste. This, says the WHO, is often-
times the reality in low-income countries.
According to the organisation, around
16 billion injections are administered every
year. It estimates that in 2000, injections
with contaminated syringes caused 21 mil-
lion hepatitis B virus infections, two million
hepatitis C virus infections and 260 000 HIiv
infections worldwide. Many of these infec-
tions were avoidable if the syringes had been
disposed of safely. The reuse of disposable
syringes and needles for injections is par-
ticularly common in some African, Asian,
and central and eastern European countries.
During June 2000,
six children were
diagnosed with a
mild form of small-
pox after having
played with glass
ampoules contain-
ing expired smallpox vaccine at a dump in
Vladivostok, Russia.
More recently, The New Vision newspaper
in Uganda reported that dangerous and haz-
ardous waste is being dumped near Jinja,
at an informal settlement of around 10 000
people, known as Masese 3. Residents
report that raw, rotten chicken, chemicals,
antibiotics and antifungal drugs are being
disposed of on their doorstep.
Near Lake Victoria, concerns have arisen
about leachate. The newspaper reported
that the Jinja municipal council’s environ-
ment officer, Ernest Nabihamba, down-
played the likely environment and health
effects of leachate to the community.
“Leachate secreted at the waste manage-
ment plant is controlled and collected. We
have ensured that the one generated from
the landfill does not flow into the commu-
nity,” he says. He added: “Soil is a filter,
so leachate is filtered down and there is no
threat to the underground water because the
water table in the area is
about 20 m down.” He
also said that leachate
produced at the garbage
site does not have the
potential to pollute Lake
Victoria. “Lake Victoria is
4 km away. So by the time rain water reach-
es the lake, it has been filtered through the
wetlands. So nothing dangerous goes into
the lake.”
With uncontrolled disposal such as report-
ed on in Masese 3, the risk is not only to
communities close to disposal sites, but
also to the informal reclaimers so common
in developing countries. The WHO says:
“In developing countries, additional hazards
occur from scavenging at waste disposal
sites and the manual sorting of hazardous
waste from health care establishments.
These practices are common in many
regions of the world. The waste handlers are
at immediate risk of needle-stick injuries and
exposure to toxic or infectious materials.”
WHO says radioactive often does not
receive the attention that it deserves. “The
use of radiation sources in medical and other
applications is widespread throughout the
world. Occasionally, the public is exposed
to radioactive waste, which originates from
HEALTH CARE WASTE MANAGEMENT
Responsible disposal a global challengeThe global community continues to face challenges in the disposal of health care waste,
particularly in low-income or developing countries where training and fi nance are limited.
Yanna Erasmus reports.
The amount of waste generated per hospital bed varies greatly across the world
48 – RéSource February 2013
ORDINARYFURNACESCANBETRANSFORMED INTOENVIRONMENTALLYFRIENDLY, FUEL-EFFICIENTASSETS...HOWDEN KNOW-HOW
©Howden Africa Ltd. All rights reserved. 2009
Howden Africa1A Booysens Road, Booysens 2091 Johannesburg, South AfricaTel: +27 11 240 - 4090 Fax: +27 11 493 - 3861Email: [email protected]
Howden’s track record includes: Incineratorswith emission controlto international standards•Calcining ovens for automotive catalysts• Industrial furnaces• Process air heaters •Heavy duty ovens formould drying•Retrofits of furnaces and ovens.
Our customer-focused approach provides a comprehensive servicefrom initial proposal to long-term support. Howdenmakes furnaceand incinerator ownership and operation a viable investment.
Howden can convert furnaces and driers to give decades ofenvironmentally-friendly, efficient operation. Drawing on a vastreservoir of engineering experience, and considerable expertisein flue gas conditioning technology, EC&I and SCADA, we offerseamless design and development of turnkey systems.
Find out more:
howden.co.za
radiotherapy treatment that has not been
disposed of properly. Serious accidents
weere documented in Brazil in 1988 (where
four people died and 28 had serious radia-
tion burns), Mexico and Morocco in 1983,
Algeria in 1978 and Mexico in 1962.”
According to Obid, the lack of adequate
funding remains a serious issue, “particu-
larly for publicly operated hospitals in mid-
dle- and low-income countries. Managers
naturally look at what offers the best perfor-
mance for the money available”.
His research has shown that different
systems apply across the world, which
includes embedding the infectious waste
in a land- fill containing municipal
solid waste or using spe-
cially designed land-
fills. He writes
that “most
infectious agents do not have a long lifetime
under landfill conditions”.
Incineration is punted as the best recourse
for dealing with infectious health care waste,
but this too has its own challenges. If incin-
erators are aged and not regulated, mer-
cury and dioxin emissions become a serious
threat to communities living close by. Obid
says: “Traditionally many hospitals in west-
ern Europe and the US ran their own incin-
erators. This had the major advantages of
disinfecting the medical wastes completely
and reducing the amount of waste requiring
transport and disposal elsewhere. Mercury
emissions from medical waste incinera-
tion originate from thermometers, blood
pressure gauges, batteries or amalgam
that are discarded incor-
rectly as medical waste
in the hospital. Dioxins
are generated due to the
presence of chlorine in
the waste, caused by PVC
and, in some countries, by chlorine used in
chemical disinfection. The implementation
of higher emission standards has increased
the cost of running a waste incinerator, both
in terms of labour and flue gas scrubbing.
As a result, many of the small hospital
incinerators in Europe and the US have been
shut down, so larger, centralised facilities
have emerged.”
In the US, some 85% of health care waste
is incinerated. Historically, the generators of
medical waste relied on smaller plants to
incinerate their waste, but after new regu-
lations from the Environmental Protection
Agency were introduced in 1997, many
smaller facilities shut down.
“The new centralised plants, equipped with
high-standard flue gas cleaning equipment,
often serve a region with 10 million or more
inhabitants and incinerate approximately 15
to 20 t per day. However, the higher costs of
using these facilities (particularly transport
costs) are prompting hospitals to apply dis-
infection methods on their premises.”
The same has occurred in South Africa.
Smaller facilities that did not comply were
shut down and there is a shortage of com-
pliant incineration facilities to dispose of
medical waste.
Health care waste
in a land- fill conta
solid wa
ciall
Incineration is punted as the best recourse for dealing with infectious health care waste...
RéSource February 2013 – 49
Panel introduction
Over the last 50 years, 3S MEDIA has evolved into a modern-day print and digital media company that offers businesses and professionals in various spheres the leading edge to grow and develop their vocations, disciplines and/or companies.
MEDIAwww.3smedia.co.za tel: +27 (0)11 233 2600 fax: +27(0) 11 234 7275 [email protected] No 4, 5th Avenue, Rivonia, 2191 PO Box 92026, Norwood, 2117
3SMEDIA publishes: IMIESA IMESA Yearbook Inside Mining Infrastructure Intelligence Meetings SA miningne.ws Occupational Risk Online ReSource SA Conference Directory Transport World Africa Water&Sanitation Africa
LET YOUR BRAND STAND OUT WITH 3S MEDIA
W hile South Africa is on a drive to
minimise waste and apply the
waste hierarchy where landfilling
is the final option, we are not there yet. Diver-
sion of waste to landfill may be the buzzwords
in the waste industry in South Africa, but in re-
ality the country still relies heavily on landfill-
ing for both municipal and hazardous waste.
Tenders are still being put out and awarded
for landfill sites and many are still in use
across the country. Small municipalities rely
on landfilling and so too do the the metros
of South Africa. Landfills, if not properly en-
gineered, designed and maintained, pose a
human- and environmental health hazard. As
such, it is important for landfill sites to be
pristine in their structure, categorisation and
day-to-day functioning.
Environmental impacts on the groundwa-
ter resources and the surrounding ecosys-
tems are vital considerations. The main
challenge here is, of course, that members
of the public do not want landfills to be
close to residential areas and the land far
away from these is generally greenfield,
which further increases transport costs for
waste disposal.
Landfills must be well designed and above
all, leachate as well as methane gas
production must be controlled. During its
lifespan, a landfill must be monitored for
the type of waste disposed of, the total
waste incoming, covering of the landfill
daily and the management of informal
reclaimers. And at the end of its life, it must
be rehabilitated.
This takes expert knowledge and expe-
rience. Yanna Erasmus talks to these
experts about landfill design, challenges,
innovations and technology.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
The A to Z of landfillsWaste of all shapes, sizes and types are produced as a
by-product of daily activity . Many of these waste streams
are extremely hazardous and require specialised treatment
and/or disposal methods.
50 – RéSource February 2013
Panel discussion
What is the central focus of your company in relation to waste management? Jones
& Wagener has been active in
the field of waste and tailings
management for the past 27
years. Our involvement covers
the design and operational
input to commercial waste
disposal facilities (both general
and hazardous); landfill gas
extraction, conveyance and
destruction; mining waste; and
industrial waste.
What is unique about the services that your firm provides? We provide a
complete professional service
encompassing initial planning,
classification, environmental
authorisation, design and project
execution. Our involvement
often extends to operational
advice and ongoing surveillance.
Our geotechnical capabilities
complement our expertise
in the areas of geosynthetic
and mineral clay barriers
and liner stability, as well
as siting of waste facilities.
We strive to keep abreast
of the latest technology in
waste management by regular
Jabulile Msiza, Associate: Jones & Wagener
attendance and presentations
at local and international
conferences. Our staff actively
participate in professional
societies such as SAICE
(South African Institute of Civil
Engineers and its branches),
the IWMSA and the GIGSA
(Geosynthetic Interest Group of
South Africa).
Jones & Wagener deals with varied waste streams, including tailings. How is the management of this different from other hazardous waste streams such as health care waste? Tailings facilities are
much larger in size and have a
complex filling sequence that
ensures the stability of the
structure as a whole. Failures of
these facilities are catastrophic,
hence regular surveillance
of freeboard and stability is
extremely important.
What, in your opinion, are the greatest challenges to efficient landfill management in South Africa? The
greatest challenges
are the shortage
of civil engineering
skills and general
awareness of
engineering
principles
particularly
in relation to
landfill operation.
This is critical
especially at local
government level.
No amount of engineering
design can compensate for
poor management of the
landfilling operation.
What are the essential features a landfill or waste site must possess to have environmental synchrony? An
engineered barrier system to
separate the waste body from
the receiving environment along
with a good drainage system
to drain resulting leachates
from the waste body without
building up excessive pressure
on the barrier. Good stormwater
and leachate management
systems to prevent the escape
of contaminants prior to the
capping and rehabilitation of
the landfill. Monitoring systems
to monitor the performance
of installed systems, waste
pile stability, groundwater and
stormwater quality.
What are your recent accomplishments/flagship projects? We have
designed and are currently
supervising the construction
of a 5 million square metres
large ash storage facility
with a storage capacity of
425 million cubic metres.
When completed, this will be
the fourth largest coal-fired
power station in the world
and the first dry ash dump
to be lined in South Africa.
We’ve also designed and are
supervising the construction
of one of the first hazardous
waste cells to be designed
and approved as per new draft
standards for Disposal of Waste
to Landfill at South Africa’s
largest H:H privately owned
landfill site. On rehabilitation,
we have undertaken a study
on internationally accepted and
alternative capping designs for a
large industrial waste facility and
have designed the instrumented
plots for the pilot testing of
the capping designs chosen. A
number of these designs are
innovative and will use waste
materials available on-site.
Where have your recent growth areas been? Our
environmental engineering
division has expanded, with
a new branch in Centurion
specialising in the rehabilitation
design of opencast mines and
discard/waste dumps.
We have developed reha-
bilitation design tools and
methodologies that optimise
the construction costs with
environmental impacts to
achieve sustainable final post
rehabilitation landforms. Also,
we are actively involved with
and continually improve the
development of best practice
management systems to be
applied with construction,
ensuring the implementation
of the rehabilitation works are
efficiently carried out.
We are currently involved with
the rehabilitation design of a
combined 2 400 ha opencast
pit complex with a currently esti-
mated volume of material to be
moved in the order of 125 mil-
lion cubic metres to achieve
final rehabilitation levels. With
our optimisation techniques,
we aim to reduce this volume
by approximately 15%, while
achieving a natural sustainable
post-rehabilitation environment
and regaining a land-use suit-
able for future generations.
We strive to keep abreast of the latest
technology in waste management by regular
attendance and presentations at local and
international conferences
Barrier installation at a hazardous waste disposal facility
52 – RéSource February 2013
What is Envitech’s primary function or focus when it comes to landfills? Envitech Solutions
provides an environmentally
sound solution for the safe dis-
posal of wastes, including both
general and hazardous wastes.
We provide the full range of
services in landfill engineering
from site selection through to
geotechnical and hydrogeological
site investigations, infrastructure
design, landfill cell and lining sys-
tems design, including leachate
and landfill gas management sys-
tems. One of our specialities is
the performance of Construction
Quality Assurance on projects
where complex lining systems
are being constructed and which
include geosynthetic materials
such as geomembranes (HDPE,
fPP, etc.), geotextiles and geosyn-
thetic clay liners. We have carried
out a number of these assign-
ments both in South Africa and in
the Middle East. In recent years
we have also been involved in the
development of a number of land-
fill gas-to- electricity projects in
South Africa, with the first project
of its kind being carried out in
Durban for eThekwini Municipality.
In your view, what are the major shortcomings of non-compliant landfills in SouthAfrica? Most landfills in South
Africa are owned and operated
by municipalities. Although some
metros and larger municipali-
ties make adequate provision
for the proper construction or
development of landfills and the
operations and management
thereof, there are too many
municipalities that fall short of
what could be considered to be
acceptable in terms of waste
disposal practices. The major
shortcomings include:
• lack of political will to ensure
that sufficient provision is
made in terms of resourc-
es, including human and
financial resources
• lack of adequately trained
and experienced personnel in
waste management, particu-
larly in the operating and man-
agement of landfill sites
• lack of adequate budget to
procure and maintain the
appropriate equipment and
plant that is required
• lack of planning for the
development of future land-
fill facilities with the result
that many municipalities and
even metros are running
out of airspace, which is a
major concern
• many existing landfills are not
licensed or permitted, and in
many instances are incorrectly
located or managed, with sig-
nificant environmental impact
• many of the existing landfills
can best be described as
dumps as no proper opera-
tional or management proce-
dures are in place and most
of the wastes dumped there
are burnt in open fires, caus-
ing air pollution in and around
the sites.
What are the challenges of rehabilitating a landfill after closure? The rehabilitation of a
landfill site after closure mainly
involves assessing whether the
landfill has previously impacted
on or is currently impacting
on the environment. Having
assessed the extent of any
impact, mitigation measures
need to be implemented in the
rehabilitation or closure design.
Another important aspect is
the after use of the site and its
suitability for use by the local
community. Development on top
of closed landfill sites is usually
not possible due to the potential
settlement of the waste body,
which makes it very difficult
to provide stable foundation
conditions for houses or any
other buildings. Another major
challenge is post closure main-
tenance and care, including the
ongoing management of leachate
and landfill gas emanating from
the closed landfill. Depending
on the location and shape of
the site, the rehabilitated land-
fill could, however, be used for
sport fields, nature trails, moun-
tain bike or motorcycle trails.
Can you share any of your most innovative or unique
applications of landfill design as completed by Envitech? We
subscribe to the waste hierar-
chy as enshrined in the Waste
Act and the National Waste
Management Strategy, which
essentially promotes waste mini-
misation, waste reduction and
recycling as a priority. However,
we believe that for many years
to come, landfills will still be
required for the final disposal
of wastes until such time that
alternative treatment and dis-
posal solutions are put in place.
Even then, there will always be
a residue of some kind requiring
disposal to landfill. This is par-
ticularly so when considering the
affordability of alternative solu-
tions and the lack of resources
to implement even basic dis-
posal facilities.
For this reason, in designing
new landfills, we tend to look at
ways of integrating the landfill
facility into the surrounding
environment and community. In
terms of the landfill site itself,
we look at ways of “greening”
the site and, in particular, look
at developing a nature conserv-
ancy on the site should the site
be large enough to facilitate
this. A good example of this
would be the Mariannhill land-
fill site near Durban. Another
option is to incorporate the
landfill site into a larger nature
conservancy area that includes
the surrounding community.
An example of this would be
the new Vlakfontein Hazardous
Waste Facility near Vereeniging,
which has recently received a
waste licence and is due to
be constructed this year. The
new waste treatment and land-
fill facility is located within a
Panel discussion
Stan Jewaskiewitz, Director: Envitech Solutions
We believe that for many years to come, landfills will still be required for the final disposal of wastes until such time that alternative treatment and disposal solutions are put in place
LEFT The eThekweni landfill gas-to-electricity project at Bisasar Road Landfill in Durban
RéSource February 2013 – 53
Environmental Engineering
Integrated Waste Management
Recycling, Composting, Anaerobic Digestion
& Thermal Treatment
Waste-to-Energy
Landfill Engineering, Liner Design and CQA
Landfill Gas Management & Power
Generation
Leachate Management & Treatment
Mine Waste Management, Closure &
Rehabilitation
registered nature conservancy.
In terms of technical innova-
tion, we constantly strive to
keep abreast of international
developments, in particular the
design of landfill lining systems
involving geosynthetics. In this
regard, we work closely with
manufacturers and installers
of lining systems to ensure
that a practical and cost-
effective solution is arrived at
to benefit both the client and
the environment.
Finally, we look at facilities
that can be put in place at the
landfill site to reduce the actual
amount of waste being dis-
posed of in the landfill. These
include waste treatment plants
and materials recovery facili-
ties, which can also be used as
a means of job creation for the
local community.
Are waste-to-energy applica-tions effective on landfills in terms of cost and return? Waste-to-energy applications
essentially comprise two
avenues for the disposal of
wastes. Firstly, waste can be
treated directly using thermal
or non-thermal technologies to
produce energy and the residue
is reused or disposed of in a
landfill. Secondly, wastes can
be disposed of in a landfill and
landfill gas is generated through
the decomposition of the organic
fraction of the waste. The landfill
gas, comprising mostly methane
and carbon dioxide, can then
be used as an energy source to
produce heat, steam or gener-
ate electricity in a gas engine.
Landfill gas-to-electricity projects
have already been implemented
in South Africa and some of
them have proved to be viable.
The financial viability of any
waste to energy application is
dependent on a number of fac-
tors and these include the capi-
tal cost, operational cost and
the revenue that can be derived
from the sale of the energy.
Due to the high cost of these
technologies, a waste-to-energy
project is normally integrated
into a waste disposal system
that includes other processes
such as recycling, compost-
ing, etc. These processes give
rise to other revenue streams,
which aid the financial viability
of the project.
Waste-to-energy applications
can therefore be cost effective
depending on size and location,
and more importantly, the mar-
ket for the sale of the energy
and the sale of other products,
such as recyclables and com-
post, etc. These applications
are generally not suited to
small landfill sites.
What recent landfill pro-jects have you completed? Some of our recent landfill
projects include:
• the closure design and licens-
ing of the Henley-on-Klip land-
fill site near Vereeniging
• the design and licensing of
the Lepelle-Nkumpi landfill
near Polokwane
• the design of the new
Olifantsfontein landfill site for
a private owner
• the design and licensing of
the new Vlakfontein Waste
Treatment and Disposal
Facility, for hazardous waste,
for a private client.
ABOVE LEFT Deployment of HDPE geomembrane on 1 million square metres landfill site in Qatar ABOVE RIGHT Landfill gas pumping trial at Luuipaardsvlei landfill
54 – RéSource February 2013
What is the central focus of your company in relation to landfill engineering? We
specialise in the design of all
classes of landfills, general
as well as hazardous. We
aim to design landfills that
are practical to construct and
operate, with the main focus
being on effectively providing
a barrier between groundwater
and the waste body. We feel
that construction quality
assurance (CQA) by qualified
and experienced staff is just as
essential to landfill engineering
as the design itself.
In your view, what are the essential elements of a well-engineered general waste landfill? The landfill will
have to be well engineered
in terms of stability and also
have a leachate drainage
system designed towards
effective leachate drainage to
minimise the static head on
the lining system. We also view
manufacturing quality assurance
(MQA) as well as CQA of the
lining system as an integral part
in the process of establishing
a well-engineered landfill
facility. The best designed lining
system would be rendered
useless if not installed/
constructed properly.
It obviously makes the design
and operation of a landfill
Panel discussion
Jan Palm, Engineer and owner: Jan Palm Consulting Engineers
much easier when the landfill
is suitably located with regards
to the receiving environment
and local climatic conditions.
Please share some of your most innovative and/or challenging designs. Vissershok H:H Waste Management Facility The rehabilitation of Cell 3C
at Vissershok H:H Waste
Management Facility outside
Cape Town was a challenging
design. It is a mono-cell
containing contaminated sand
and the client requested the
sand be isolated from the rest
of the waste in the landfill.
The capping consisted of
the following:
• bulk earthworks to shape 1:3
side slopes and final shape
on top of the cell
• 150 mm thick base
preparation layer on the top
of the cell
• 1.5 mm HDPE geomembrane
(supplied and installed by
Geosynthetic Contractor)
• 200 mm thick sand
protection layer on top of the
geomembrane on the top of
the cell
• 300 mm thick stone leachate
drainage layer (38 mm crushed
stone) on top of the cell
• per forated HDPE leachate
drainage pipe in the stone
drainage layer
• Naue 120/40 R6 reinforcing
grid on the northern
and western 1:3 slopes
(supplied and installed by
Geosynthetic Contractor)
• 300 mm thick sand
protection layer on top of the
geomembrane on the 1:3
side slopes
• 200 mm thick topsoil on
the northern and western
1:3 side slopes as
growth medium
• Kaytech soil saver over
the topsoil
• hydro-seeding of the northern
and western slopes.
The biggest challenge on the
project was the placing of the
sand protection layer on the
1:3 slopes on top of the HDPE.
A reinforcing grid was used to
prevent the sand from sliding
down the slope, but due to the
HDPE capping the grid could
not be anchored on top of the
cell. A run-out length on top of
the cell had to be designed for
the grid to provide sufficient
“anchorage” from the weight
of the sand on top of it. The
grid must be able to not only
carry the weight of the sand
and topsoil, but also the
construction plant during the
installation process. The design
was done in conjunction with
NAUE, Germany, which also
supplied all the geosynthetic
material for the project.
City of Windhoek: Kupferberg LandfillWe were appointed to
design and supervise the
construction of various waste
containment facilities at the
Kupferberg Landfill outside
Windhoek, Namibia.
One of the biggest challenges
in the design was that most
of the future new cells were
constructed on top of old
waste bodies. The underlying
waste in these areas are very
old (1974 as indicated from
dug-up newspapers) and most
of the secondary settlement
(due to biodegradation of
the waste) had already taken
place. We were still concerned
that some settlement could
occur. The cells constructed
on top of old waste were all
designed to be shallow cells to
prevent excavations in waste.
The following steps were
taken to minimise the effect
of possible settlement
underneath the cells:
• reinforcing grids were
installed underneath the lining
system to prevent/minimise
localised settlement
• selected fill was imported
to construct a solid base
underlying the lining system
• all the cell floors were also
designed steeper than
usual to maintain free
draining even in the event of
some settlement
• overlaps in the geosynthetic
clay layers (GCL) were
increased to avoid panel
separation in case of
possible settlement
• cells were designed with two
separate low points (sumps)
in the event of a blockage/
failure of one
• the cell floors were designed
and constructed with a ‘bulge’
in the middle to allow for
possible settlement and if
there was any, to prevent the
forming of a low point in the
middle of the cell as a result.
Due to the unavailability
of clay, all lining systems
consisted of geosynthetic
material, except the leachate
drainage layer, which was
crushed stone, and the HDPE
protection layer, which was
clean imported sand. HDPE
Vissershok H:H Waste Management Facility
RéSource February 2013 – 55
Panel discussion
Integrated Waste Management PlansWaste Disposal StrategiesIdentification and permitting of landfill sitesDesign of General and Hazardous Waste sitesDesign of Solid Waste Transfer StationsDesign of Material Recovery FacilitiesOptimisation of Waste Collection SystemsAuditing of Waste Management FacilitiesDevelopment of Operational PlansClosure and Rehabilitation of LandfillsQuality Assurance on Synthetic LinersWaste Recycling Plans
Specialist Waste Management ConsultantsSustainable and appropriate engineering solutions with integrity and professionalism.
Jan Palm Consulting EngineersTel +27 21 982 6570 / Fax +27 21 981 0868 / E-mail [email protected] / www.jpce.co.za
Gansbaai Recycling Centre
Velddrif Transfer Station
Botrivier Drop-off
Hermanus Materials Recovery Facility
Vissershok Waste Management Facility
Stanford Drop-off
was used in conjunction with
GCL as a composite liner.
Geosynthetic flow nets were
used as the leakage detection
drainage medium.
Due to the extreme heat
during daytime, the covering
of the sand protection layer
on top of the HDPE would
have been difficult due to the
waves in the HDPE as a result
of its high thermal expansion
coefficient. In the contract
specifications we addressed
this by specifying that the
covering of the HDPE can only
be done early in the morning or
late afternoon when the HDPE
will be in a flat state.
What are your recent accomplishments/flagship projects? If looking at only landfill
projects, the following:
• City of Windhoek (Namibia):
Design and CQA of
hazardous cells, general
cells, leachate lagoon and
contaminated stormwater
dam at the Kupferberg Landfill
outside Windhoek.
• Enviroserv: Ongoing design
and CQA of new cells (waste)
and encapsulation cells
(high hazardous waste) at
the Vissershok H:H Waste
Management Facility,
Cape Town.
• Stellenbosch Municipality:
Design and CQA of new
Cell 3 at the Stellenbosch
Landfill (G:M:B+).
• Overstrand Municipality:
Design and CQA of a new
cell at the Gansbaai G:M:B-
Landfill Facility.
• Identification of new
regional landfills for West
Coast and Cape Winelands
district municipalities
• Transactional advisors for
Drakenstein Municipality for
the establishment of a waste-
to-energy facility to divert
waste from landfill.
• Assistance with the
establishment of long-term
(more than three years)
public-private partnerships
for Swartland and Overstrand
municipalities for the
operation of their landfills.
What differentiates your service from others in the industry? We believe that our
many years of experience in
municipal solid waste-related
projects provide us with an
intimate understanding of not
only waste and its associated
challenges, but also of
municipal systems.
Due to this advantage, we
can be more innovative in our
approach towards designs
and strategies.
Kupferberg Landfill
56 – RéSource February 2013
Wastewater
This picture has changed dramati-
cally. Eskom introduced energy tariff
increases of 25% per annum over a
three-year period up to 2012, followed by fur-
ther annual increases estimated at 7% over
a seven-year period. To add to the pressure,
the Department of Water Affairs is increasing
regulatory pressure on municipalities to com-
ply with stricter effluent discharge standards.
Literature indicates that current trends are
to opt for advanced treatment technologies
with associated high energy requirements in
order to achieve the more exacting effluent
quality requirements.
The cumulative effect is that energy has
become the highest single cost item (along
with man-hours) on the balance sheet of
municipalities and a critical performance driv-
er and enabler. Plant managers are already
faced with the challenge to reduce treatment
costs with limited budgets, burdened by age-
ing plants with mechanical equipment that
is not operated with energy efficiency as
precursor. The net impact is that the ever-
increasing cost of providing municipal water
services within the boundaries of legislation
is likely to be passed on to the consumer via
higher public municipal tariffs.
It is has become imperative to optimise
energy efficiency and develop opportunities
for energy generation from wastewater and
sludge as part of the municipal wastewa-
ter business. International best estimates
indicate that energy gains and savings of
5 to 30% are realistic, and that 100% self-
sustainability in power supply is possible.
Local indications are that up to 60% of the
energy requirements can be achieved by the
implementation of cell lysis processes with
combined heat and power (CHP) production.
These opportunities can only be realised if
the key players have a baseline from where
to conceptualise and formulate a cohesive
development plan to address the key risks
associated with the water-energy nexus.
The paper focuses on setting a baseline to
support higher order energy considerations
in the wastewater industry, in order to influ-
ence perspectives and advance principles
and incentives that would guide regulators
and parastatals in assuming a development
role in a sustainable and compliant future
municipal wastewater sector.
IntroductionKey issues are to be addressed if govern-
ment, municipalities and water sector stake-
holders (professional service providers and
private operators) are to prepare adequately
for a sustainable and compliant wastewater
treatment industry. Apart from man-hours,
energy is becoming the single most critical
performance enabler and cost driver on the
balance sheets of municipal wastewater treat-
ment plants in South Africa, with potentially
far reaching economic, social and environ-
mental consequences.
The cost of municipal services tariffs are
escalating at a rate that exceeds the abil-
ity of the consumer to pay, as is evident
in the increasing number of municipalities
that battle to achieve acceptable payment
levels. Whereas this has previously affected
smaller towns and municipalities, the trend
is spreading to also impact on cities and
metropolitan municipalities (Cooperative
Governance and Traditional Affairs, 2009).
It is against this backdrop that the ration-
ale that effluent quality requirements and
the associated costs to achieve such quali-
ties must be assessed. Higher levels of
service (e.g. waterborne sewers) and more
advanced treatment technology (e.g. acti-
vated sludge biological nutrient removal) are
generally associated with higher costs. If
higher levels of service are not affordable,
the ability of a municipality to recover its
costs is negatively affected, threatening the
A realistic perspective of energy optimisation considerations
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN SOUTH AFRICA
by Rudi Scheepers*, Marlene vd Merwe-Botha**
Engineers and wastewater treatment plant owners have historically not considered power
consumption as a critical design parameter in the South African wastewater industry, as
the country has experienced an abundance of low-priced electricity for many years.
SUBSCRIBE Subscriber contact detailsSurname:
Name:
Designation:
Company:
Type of business:
Address: Code:
Tel: Fax:
Cell:
E-mail:
Subscriber VAT Reg. No:
Order #:
Payment options
EFT Deposit: Bank details Nedbank Branch code: 128405 Acc. number: 1284129934
Acc. type: current Acc. name: 3S MEDIA
Please use Ref: #:
Mastercard Visa
Expiry date: /
Credit Card Number
Last 3 digits on back of card:
Debit order – Please contact Accounts on 011 233 2600 to organise
I have read the terms and conditions below and I agree to abide by themAuthorizing signature: Date: Contact person for payments: E-mail:
Terms & Conditions
to follow.
subscriptions.
and cancelled if not paid by the date.
Fax or e-mail proof of payment to activate your subscription.
MEDIA
No.4 5th Avenue, Rivonia 2191 PO Box 92026, Norwood 2117
Tel: +27 (0)11 233 2600Share Call: 086 003 3300 Fax: +27 (0)11 234-7274/5www.3smedia.co.za
Hard Copy + Digital 530 110 120
Digital Only 360 80 90
Hard Copy + Digital 290 60 80
Digital Only 200 40 60
Hard Copy + Digital 190 40 60
Digital Only 150 30 40
Hard Copy + Digital 420 80 60
Digital Only 270 60 80
Hard Copy + Digital 290 60 80
Digital Only 200 40 60
SUBSCRIPTION SALES
Hard Copy + Digital 290 60 80
Digital Only 200 40 60
Hard Copy + Digital 200 40 60
Digital Only 130 30 40
CONFERENCE
58 – RéSource February 2013
Wastewater
The above questions are raised as part of a full length submission, which will be featuring over subsequent editions as part of a series. In the next edition is the outline and objective of the study undertaken in light of the questions raised. For more information regarding the paper, please contact [email protected].
revenue base and the financial sustainabil-
ity of the municipality.
Energy efficiency is a critical component
along the value chain of sustainable ser-
vice provision and responsible life cycle
infrastructure development. The global
water sector is already seen to look
beyond the ambit of conventional
treatment to also concentrate
on a sustainable relationship
between water and energy
(electricity). South Africa is
already exploring and pilot-
scaling a project associated
with the supply and demand side in
the greater uptake of energy from the waste-
water sector (Burton et al., 2009).
Water-energy nexusEnergy and water have a symbiotic rela-
tionship and wastewater treatment plants
(WWTPs) contribute to this connection.
WWTPs in the US contribute between 0.1 to
0.3% of the total energy consumption of the
country (WEF, 1997). It becomes increasingly
evident that the impact of the rising demand
for both of these recourses is imminent.
The global water industry is exploring
methods of moving and treating water and
wastewater that are environmentally sus-
tainable and economically viable. This global
approach to balance these two resources is
illustrated in Figure 1.
Over and above the demand for higher
levels of service and technologies, climate
change is also affecting the water cycle.
Some of its impacts can be mitigated
through technical developments and social,
economic and environmental response, as
is demonstrated in Australia. Key energy
demand areas are: pumping over wide ser-
vice areas, asset condition and pipe leak-
age, treatment by aeration and pumping raw
and treated effluent (Global Water Research
Coalition 2010, Turton, 2008).
Electricity cost has become an important
driver to treat wastewater, which resulted
in new and amended technology introduced
to the market in the last 20 years. The
standard approach across the globe will
be to optimise the equipment and sys-
tems for a sustainable and cost-effective
future. There is strong evidence that up
to 15% of wastewater energy demand can
be offset by biogas generation and CHP.
Pumping represents upwards of 30% for
wastewater; however, aeration presents up
to 60% or more of the usage for the service
(Global Water Research Coalition, 2010).
The best opportunities for reducing energy
demand seems to be linked to the high
usage components.
Electricity supply in South AfricaEskom generates 95% of South Africa’s elec-
tricity and 45% of Africa’s electricity that is
exported to Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe,
Mozambique, Swaziland and Lesotho. Coal
contributes 92% towards the country’s elec-
tricity supply (Eskom, 2010). Eskom’s annual
report in 2009 revealed that South Africa is a
net importer of water and the trend will con-
tinue in the future (Eskom, 2009). The cost to
generate energy from fossil fuels will increase
as power generation is still a large consumer
of water, which accounts for about 2% of all
water used in South Africa.
In January 2008, South Africa experienced
electricity shortages that resulted in black-
outs and “load shedding” was implemented
nationwide for the first time in history.
According to Eskom, various capacity limi-
tations were experienced that resulted in
reduced demand to the grid supply and
affected the entire country in all economic
sectors of industry for almost an entire year.
The water sector was greatly affected by
these impacts. To date, the total effect of
these power supply disruptions to treatment
plants and pump stations has not yet been
completely investigated and quantified. It is,
however, fair to observe that the external
and secondary costs incurred as a result of
downtime, and damage to equipment and
processes responsible for collection and
treatment of wastewater is significant and
affected the end user, the environment and
the economy significantly.
Since April 2008, electricity consumers
have felt the effects of price increases,
which compounded to a 260% increase
including the last increase of 25,8% in
April 2011. Eskom, however, has indicated
that it would be applying to the National
Energy Regulator of South Africa for fur-
ther 25% increases for each of 2013 and
2014, which are the first two years of
the next Multi-Year Price Determination.
If the applied increases are awarded,
the compound average electricity price
would increase by more than five times
in the seven-year period from April
2008 to April 2014 (Moneyweb 2011).
Both certainty and uncertainty indicators
give rise to multiple questions posed in the
wastewater industry:
• Are wastewater collection and treatment
facilities equipped to effectively adapt to fur-
ther power disruption events in the country?
• Are treatment technologies upgraded and
new facilities designed with an energy
efficiency perspective and realistic electric-
ity cost centres, preferably ring fenced, to
manage and contain operational and main-
tenance costs?
• How will the treatment industry in South
Africa present itself by 2050 when the glob-
al water sector focuses on self-sufficient
treatment facilities?
• Is the water regulator sufficiently cognisant
of the trade-off between stricter effluent
quality requirements and energy intensity
to deliver such qualities with a shrinking
technical skills sector?
• Are municipal infrastructure funding agen-
cies geared to evaluate energy requirements
as a critical sustainability parameter over
the asset life cycle chain when considering
motivations for high-end technologies?
• Is Eskom putting sufficient and practical
incentives in place to reward energy genera-
tion or savings initiatives by municipalities,
and are avenues explored to partake in
capital renewal projects with high uptake
and energy benefits?
* GIBB, PO Box 3965, Cape Town, 8000,
South Africa.
E-mail: [email protected]
**WaterGroup (Pty) Ltd, South Africa
FIGURE 1: Schematic illustration of the water–energy resource nexus showing the connectivity among the three entities in a balanced sphere
60 – RéSource February 2013
Plant and equipment
Manitou South Africa, a subsidiary of
the Manitou Group in France, has
recently introduced the new Waste
Handler as an innovative alternative to the
Tractor Loader Backhoe (TLB), especially on
smaller sites that make up around 70% of the
approximately 1 000 landfills in South Africa.
Its introduction follows intensive product de-
velopment in cooperation with Interwaste, a
leading South African waste management and
environmental services company.
The Manitou Waste Handler is a versatile,
holistic waste management system that
can efficiently tow, push, load, compact and
effect on-site dust control measures. Only
one man is needed to operate the machine,
making it an economically attractive option.
It can load its own cover material from the
site stockpile, can be used to collect waste
materials and is ideally suited to handle the
problem of illegal dumping.
During recent site trials, the Manitou
Waste Handler exceeded minimum require-
ments as it processed and compacted
over 50 tph of waste, averaged over a
nine-hour shift. Compaction densities of
450 kg/m3 without cover and 550 kg with
cover material were achieved. This repre-
sents an impressive 3:1 compaction ratio
(loose general waste has an average den-
sity of 150 kg/m3.
The Waste Handler is based on a standard
Manitou Telescopic, adapted with protective
guards and Belly plates to suit harsh landfill
site conditions. It also features solid tyres,
which remove the threat of punctures that
standard TLBs are particularly prone to.
The Manitou Waste Handler is supported
nationwide by an expert technical team that
can offer operational training on the machine
as well as guidance on the implementation
of its landfill applications. General waste
management training is also offered.
As well as the Waste Handler, the Manitou
Group also supplies the waste management
industry with the Gehl Skid Steer Loader,
which when fitted with the TurboSaw attach-
ment can be used to clear, remove and
process large green waste materials for
clearing and composting.
The companyManitou South Africa distributes and sup-
ports a wide range of material handling
equipment to the construction, agricultural,
mining, defence and environmental sec-
tors. High performance levels and safety
standards, as well as lower operating costs
enable Manitou to deliver improved opera-
tional profitability.
The company operates an advanced
nationwide aftermarket and support ser-
vice offering 95% parts availability 24
hours a day, throughout the year, on all
Manitou equipment.
The company offers specially tailored
service and finance packages structured
to meet individual business requirements,
whether operating a single machine or a
large fleet.
Warranties and maintenance contracts
are also among a comprehensive range of
personalised services available with the
purchase of every Manitou machine.
MUNICIPAL WASTE MANAGEMENT
Manitou enters the waste management marketUntil now, the only single machine that was able to
execute the full range of daily workface operations
required on a small modern landfi ll site was a Tractor
loader Backhoe.
ABOVE AND BELOW A Manitou waste handler
62 – RéSource February 2013
I n fact, the goal is to choose the narrow-
est shoe possible to match the ground
conditions, which in the Southern Afri-
can region tend to be predominately hard
rock environments.
As Barloworld Equipment group product
specialist Deon Delport explains, proper
flotation helps to reduce wear by keeping
the tracks from becoming submerged in
material. However, using wider shoes when
they are not suited for the application can
lead to any one of the following scenarios:
• Increased bushing and sprocket wear
– Turning resistance, loads and weight
increase with wider shoes, especially in
rough underfoot conditions. This added
stress causes faster wear rates for bush-
ings and sprockets.
• Increased link, track roller, idler tread and
flange wear – Using shoes that are too wide
increases the inter ference between these
surfaces, causing them to wear faster.
• Loosening of pins, bushings and shoe
hardware – Leverage forces increase with
wider shoes. In high impact or especially
rough terrain, greater leverage forces may
lead to premature loosening of bolted and
pressed-fit components.
• Reduction of track joint life
– Bending forces are exag-
gerated when using wide
shoes in high impact appli-
cations, causing pressed
track joints to ‘open up’.
This may lead to loss of lubricant, internal
wear and replacement or reconditioning of
track joints sooner than expected.
• Shoe breakage – Severe turning resistance
in extreme conditions and bending forces
may cause wide shoes to break.
“Caterpillar supplies a range of shoe widths
to provide optimal application match-
es. Narrow shoes work best in firm foot-
ings, while wider, centre-punched shoes
are optimal for wet sand and heavy clay
where a high incidence of packing occurs,”
Delport expands.
Centre-punched shoes allow soft materi-
als to extrude through the track sections so
that they don’t stick to and pack between
mating components, preventing undercar-
riage parts from engaging correctly.
Packing is inevitable in many applications,
so finding the right balance is important.
Roller guards, for example, are designed
primarily for use in high impact underfoot
conditions and should be used sparingly in
softer ground since they may trap debris
and increase the effects of packing.
“As a general rule in every application,
always keep the undercarriage clean of
mud and debris so that rollers can turn
properly, maintain the correct track tension
and ensure that operators are fully trained
to achieve the best machine utilisation,”
adds Delport.
Choose the right shoe widthWhen it comes to choosing the right undercarriage system to match your working
application, two key factors to consider are shoe width and fl otation.
Every application affects undercarriage wear differently and requires proper track adjustment
A Cat track-type tractor elevated sprocket undercarriage system
Plant and equipment
Tel: +27 11 842 5600 / Fax: +27 11 842 5610 e-mail: [email protected] / www.pilotcrushtec.com
64 – RéSource February 2013
Industry news
T he holiday period is habitually a time
of largesse for many South Africans
and we are attracted to brightly pack-
aged products that often contain disappoint-
ingly small consumables inside their cheerful
and wasteful casings. Along with the packag-
ing, we tend to overstock on groceries that
may end up not being used and ultimately
discarded, adding to the ever growing piles of
organic waste we send to landfill every year.
Vice-president of the IWMSA, Dr Susan
Oelofse, says: “Not only
is it an unnecessary
expense to buy more food
items than we need and cannot
possibly consume, it is simply
unconscionable in today’s dif-
ficult economic times.
In terms of refuse, food – or organic
waste – is a huge landfill challenge
since it represents the major contribut-
ing factor to the production of harmful
methane gases. Altogether, a staggering
40% of the waste that ends up in our
landfills annually is organic, a clue that
tells us that as consumers we are waste-
ful creatures indeed. We can minimise this
type of waste by planning before we shop,
careful storage so that leftover food does
not become tainted and inedible, and com-
posting wherever possible.
Oelofse continues: “However, food waste
is not the preserve only of the end consum-
er, there is the issue of organic waste being
produced during the agricultural process,
as well as in harvesting, handling, storage,
processing and distribution. These factors
are critical and very good reasons for us
to support our local food producers.
There is substantially less
overall wastage if the point at which the
food originates to the point of its final dis-
tribution is reduced.
“One must also bear in mind that the
production of food requires the use of all
sorts of the earth’s resources. A horrifying
statistic is that we waste around at least
one third of our total global food produc-
tion annually. Had that wasted food not
been produced in the first place, perhaps
more trees could be grown, which would
in turn go a long way to offsetting harmful
greenhouse gas emissions.
Mismanagement of our planet, it
seems, is what we do best and yet if
we all try to make even a minuscule
difference, the cumulative effects
could make a tremendous and
positive difference.”
The IWMSA focuses on providing
education and training for its mem-
bers, as well as other interested
parties, whether private individuals or
government entities.
It is a non-profit organisation comprising
a body of dedicated professionals who
give freely and voluntarily of their time and
expertise in order to effectively educate,
promote and further the science and prac-
tice of waste management. For more infor-
mation, visit: www.iwmsa.co.za.
Ease up on food wasteNo matter what our creed, April entails public holidays, time away, entertaining and often feasting. With this traditional break soon to be upon us, the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA) urges all South Africans to reduce excessive food consumption, to compost organic waste wherever possible and also to be especially conscious of purchasing over-packaged products.
INDEX TO ADVERTISERS
African Utility Week 33
AfriSam OBC
Amandus Kahl Hamburg 13
Bell Equipment 30
Boitumelong Investment Holdings OFC
CAIA 31
Duncanmec 61
Envitech Solutions 53
Gast International SA IBC
Golder Associates 8 & 9
Howden 48
Health Care Waste Forum
Southern Africa 35
Interwaste 27
Jan Palm Consulting Engineers 55
Jones & Wagener 51
Kaytech 19
Langkloof Bricks 39
Mills & Otten 18
MTM Bodies 59
Oilkol 17, 23 & 24
Otto Waste Systems 4
Pikitup 12
Pilot Crushtec 63
Plastics|SA 44 & 45
Rose Foundation 2
Rose Foundation NORA - SA 21
SLR Consulting 37
Talbot & Talbot IFC
Watertec Africa/ Pumps Vales & Pipes
Africa 2013 43
G E O S Y N T H E T I C S & G E O M E M B R A N E S
S I M P L I C I T Y = P E R F E C T I O N
GAST is the premier provider of geosynthetic products and installation services. We provide complete service and support for any geosynthetic requirement.
GAST offers extensive experience and superior quality, innovative products. Detail drawings, as well as extensive technical and estimating support can be provided to assist with designs for the most economical and constructible configuration which meets the project requirements.
7 9 9 4 Q M S 0 0 1
www.gast .co .za • info@gast .co .zaTEL: +27 (12) 660 1616 • FAX: +27 (12) 660 2093
0860 141 141 www.afrisam.com
We’re using our grey matter to go greenConcern for an increasingly fragile planet is everyone’s business. We took the lead in the move towards a sustainable future when we became
the fi rst company in the world to measure the carbon footprint at each and every one of our operations. We continue to lead, reducing our
emissions, improving our energy effi ciency and developing advanced composite cements with low carbon footprints.
For us, however, sustainability extends beyond practices and products. Social upliftment is a big part of the future too...
which is why we invest so deeply in developing the communities in which we operate.
So when it comes to specifying cement, insist on AfriSam.
5487
Left
Righ
t
A MEMBER OF THE
Leaders in Advanced Composite Cement