Upload
muhammad-ashfaq
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ORIGINAL PAPER
Residual efficacy of thiamethoxam, Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo)Vuillemin, and diatomaceous earth formulation againstRhyzopertha dominica F. (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae)
Waqas Wakil • Tahira Riasat • Muhammad Ashfaq
Received: 31 July 2011 / Accepted: 9 December 2011 / Published online: 6 January 2012
� Springer-Verlag 2012
Abstract The residual efficacy of diatomaceous earth
alone and in combination with Beauveria bassiana
(Balsamo) Vuillemin or a neonicotinoid insecticide thia-
methoxam against Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera:
Bostrychidae) was studied under laboratory conditions. The
mortality of adult R. dominica was decreased over the
9 months of storage period and the combined application of
the test materials enhanced the mortality rates compared with
alone treatments. The greatest mortality was observed in the
combination of DE with thiamethoxam. Progeny suppres-
sion was decreased with the extended storage period. The
maximum rate of mycosis and sporulation in the cadavers of
R. dominica was observed where B. bassiana was applied
alone at the lowest-dose rate. The results of this study indi-
cate that all three control measures may provide safety for an
extended period of time against R. dominica.
Keywords Residual efficacy � Thiamethoxam �B. bassiana � Diatomaceous earth � R. dominica
Introduction
Most of the economically important stored grain insect
pests have developed resistance against generally used
grain protectants all around the world (Subramanyan and
Hagstrum 1996). In general, the tendency to increase
insect pest resistance to insecticides is related with fre-
quent application at increased dose rates, as a result the
chemical residues on grain commodities serve as a source
of resistance development in the insects. The process of
resistance development can be effectively delayed by
using integrated pest management (IPM) strategies
focusing on the use of biological control methods and the
application of safer and selective insecticides. The
insecticidal potential of entomopathogenic fungi as a
substitute to conventional grain protectants has received
considerable attention during the last few years with
particular reference of stored product insect management
(Michalaki et al. 2006; Wakil and Ghazanfar 2010; Wakil
et al. 2011). Entomopathogenic fungi have been shown to
have good residual persistence that is generally consid-
ered as the limitation in the use of customary grain pro-
tectants (Stathers et al. 2002). Various earlier studies
proposed that Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin
(Hyphomycetes) could be utilized successfully against
several stored grain insect species (Adane et al. 1996;
Meikle et al. 2001; Lord 2009).
Diatomaceous earth (DE) is another alternative for
insect control in grain and can be effective against a broad
range of stored product insects (Fields and Korunic 2000;
Subramanyam and Roesli 2000; Wakil et al. 2010). The
DEs are desiccant inert dusts that act by destroying the wax
layer of insect cuticles and cause the death due to water
loss (Ebeling 1971). DEs are non-toxic and provide long-
term protection of the produce against insect pests (Vayias
et al. 2006). Moreover, they do not affect the baking
quality of grain products and are equally effective as a
surface or admixed grain treatment.
Thiamethoxam is a second generation neonicotinoid
with systemic, contact, and stomach insecticidal activities
A contribution to the special issue on Recent Advances in Stored-
Product Protection.
Communicated by C. G. Athanassiou.
W. Wakil (&) � T. Riasat � M. Ashfaq
Department of Agricultural Entomology, University
of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
123
J Pest Sci (2012) 85:341–350
DOI 10.1007/s10340-011-0408-8
(Meienfisch et al. 2001). It has been effectively used as
seed treatment against a wide range of economically
important insect pests on an array of crops such as wheat,
barley, sorghum, corn, and cotton (Hofer and Brandl 1999;
Lawson et al. 1999). The insecticidal activity of this mol-
ecule has also been evaluated against stored grain insect
species either as seed treatment (Yue et al. 2003) or as a
grain protectant (Arthur et al. 2004).
Protection of commodities for extended time periods of
storage is a basic purpose of any grain management pro-
gram. Previous studies indicated the long-term efficacy of
DE, entomopathogenic fungi, and some traditional grain
protectants. For instance, Athanassiou et al. (2005) repor-
ted residual efficacy of Insecto, SilicoSec, and PyriSec
against Sitophilus oryzae L. on wheat and barley for up to
450 days. Similarly, the efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae
(Metschnikoff) Sorokin (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomyce-
tes) alone or in combination with Protect-It was effective
for the period of 5 months against S. oryzae and Rhyzop-
ertha dominica F. on wheat and maize (Athanassiou et al.
2008). Good residual effects of various traditional grain
protectants have also been reported against several stored
grain pests by numerous researchers (Collins and Cook
1998; Arthur 1999; Kljajic and Peric 2009).
The literature available on the residual effectiveness of
different grain protectants is lacking the efficacy assess-
ment of the treatment effect of DE formulation either with
B. bassiana or low-toxicity insecticides. In this study, we
investigated the residual effect of DE alone and in the
combined treatment with B. bassiana and a novel insecti-
cide, thiamethoxam, against R. dominica for the storage
period of 9-months. In addition to adult mortality, progeny
production was assessed and the mycosis and sporulation
on the beetles was also examined.
Materials and methods
Test insects
Two-week-old adult R. dominica used in the bioassays
were obtained from an insect culture raised on whole wheat
under laboratory conditions for up to four generations at
25 ± 2�C and 70 ± 5% r.h.
Test commodity
Infestation free, untreated wheat grain (var. Inqilab-91)
were used in the bioassays. The moisture contents of the
grain prior to the experimentation were 11.5% determined
by the Dickey-John moisture meter (Dickey-John Multi-
grain CAC II; Dickey-John Co., USA).
Test grain protectants
DE formulation used in the tests was SilicoSec (Biofa
GmbH, Munsingen, Germany), a fresh water DE contain-
ing 92% SiO2, 3% Al2O3, 1% Fe2O3, and 1% Na2O. The
B. bassiana was isolated from an infected insect (Cocci-
nella septempunctata L. Coccinellidae: Coleoptera) by
single spore method (Choi et al. 1999). The fungus was
identified on morphological characters using the key
(Barnett and Hunter 1998) and was deposited in the IPM
Laboratory of Department of Agricultural Entomology,
University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (Pakistan). It was
further sub-cultured on potato dextrose agar by incubating
at 20 ± 5�C and 70% r.h., and the conidia were harvested
using a sterilized scalpel after 14 days. The conidia were
suspended in sterile 0.05% Tween-80, enumerated with a
hemocytometer and adjusted to achieve concentrations of
1.5 9 106 and 1.5 9 108 conidia/ml. Prior to the initiation
of the tests, the germination rate of B. bassiana conidia was
determined as [90%.
The formulation of thiamethoxam used in the experi-
ments was Actara (Syngenta Pakistan Limited, Karachi,
Pakistan), a wettable granule formulation containing 25%
active ingredient.
Radial growth test
Thiamethoxam was tested at three-dose rates for the
assessment of its inhibitory effect on the radial growth of
B. bassiana. The fungus was grown on Sabouraud dextrose
agar (SDA) plates for 7 days at 25�C. Then 3-mm diameter
cores of fungus were taken from the developed cultures and
placed singly upset down in the middle of Petri dishes
containing SDA with 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 ppm of thia-
methoxam solution. The potential inhibitory effect of
insecticide on fungal growth was determined by surface
radial growth that was measured for 6 days on alternate
days. Each treatment was replicated six times and the
measurements were made along two radii at right angles to
each other drawn on the bottom of each dish (Russell et al.
2010).
Grain treatment
There were nine treatments: the DE alone (200 ppm);
thiamethoxam alone (0.5 ppm); B. bassiana alone
(1.5 9 106 and 1.5 9 108 conidia/kg of wheat); DE with
thiamethoxam; DE with the low dose of B. bassiana; DE
with the high dose of B. bassiana; thiamethoxam with the
low dose of B. bassiana; and thiamethoxam with the high
dose of B. bassiana. The wheat lots of 1 kg were prepared
in plastic jars. The thiamethoxam was dissolved in water to
prepare solution containing 0.5 ppm and then sprayed onto
342 J Pest Sci (2012) 85:341–350
123
grains spread in plastic trays by using a hand sprayer.
Before the addition of DE in insecticide treated grains, the
trays were kept in incubators set at 30�C and 70 ± 5% r.h.
for 48 h (Kavallieratos et al. 2009) to normalize the
moisture contents. The DE and B. bassiana alone or in
combination with thiamethoxam were admixed with the
grain. An additional lot of wheat grain was left untreated to
serve as control. All the lots were placed in plastic jars and
shaken manually for 3–4 min to have uniform distribution
in the grain. These jars were kept at 30�C and 70 ± 5% r.h.
in incubators during the entire period of trials.
Bioassays
The residual effectiveness of the treatments was deter-
mined for 9 months (March to November, 2010) by con-
ducting bioassays. On the initial day and every 30 days
thereafter, four samples of 70 g were taken from each jar
(treated and control) to perform the bioassays. Each 70 g
wheat sample was placed in a small jar (11 cm height and
6.5 cm diameter) followed by the introduction of 50 adult
beetles. The jars were set in incubators at 30�C and
70 ± 5% r.h. The humidity was maintained by using sat-
urated NaCl solution (Greenspan 1977). The data for
mortality count was taken after 48 h, 7, and 14 days of
exposure with the successive removal of dead adults after
each count. After the last mortality count, all the dead and
alive adults were removed from the grains and the jars were
further incubated at the same conditions for further 46 days
to record the emergence of F1 adults. The whole procedure
was replicated thrice with new materials each time inde-
pendently to avoid pseudo-replication phenomenon.
Mycosis and sporulation
The mycosed R. dominica cadavers after each mortality
count were kept in sterilized Petri plates and refrigerated at
4�C. These cadavers were surface sterilized with sodium
hypochlorite solution (0.05%) for 2–3 min followed by
three washings in sterilized distilled water. The cadavers
were placed on SDA plates that were maintained at
25 ± 2�C and 75% r.h. for 7 days. The dead insects with
white fungal growth on their body were determined under
the stereo microscope. The rate of sporulation (number of
conidia/ml) from the mycosed cadavers was determined by
mixing in 20-ml distilled water with a drop of Tween-80 in
beaker (Riasat et al. 2011). After thorough mixing of the
solution, the number of conidia/ml was counted by using
hemocytometer.
Statistical analysis
Mortality counts were corrected by using Abbott’s (1925)
formula. All data were analyzed by repeated measure
ab
b
a
b
a
a
ca
ba
a
a
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6D4D2D
Days
Rad
ial g
rwot
h/da
y (m
m)
0.25 ppm 0.50 ppm 0.75 ppm ControlFig. 1 Radial growth rate (mm/
day ± SE) of B. bassiana on
SDA amended with 0.25, 0.5,
and 0.75 ppm thiamethoxam
(Thi) (within each day means
followed by the same letter are
not significantly different; HSD
at P = 0.05)
Table 1 ANOVA parameters of main effects and interactions for mortality levels of R. dominica adults in each exposure interval (for each
exposure interval total df = 269)
S.O.V. df 48 h 7 days 14 days
F P F P F P
Storage periods 9 377.51 \0.01 735.39 \0.01 403.63 \0.01
Treatments 8 254.12 \0.01 217.79 \0.01 218.33 \0.01
Storage periods 9 treatments 72 19.25 \0.01 7.94 \0.01 8.69 \0.01
J Pest Sci (2012) 85:341–350 343
123
Ta
ble
2M
ean
mo
rtal
ity
(±S
E)
of
R.d
om
inic
aad
ult
sex
po
sed
for
48
ho
nw
hea
ttr
eate
dw
ith
on
e-d
ose
rate
of
DE
(20
0p
pm
),th
iam
eth
ox
am(T
hi)
(0.5
pp
m),
two
-do
sera
tes
of
B.b
ass
ian
a(F
1:
1.5
91
06;
F2
:1
.59
10
8co
nid
ia/k
g),
and
thei
rre
spec
tiv
eco
mb
inat
ion
sin
10
sto
rag
ep
erio
ds
con
du
cted
fro
m0
to2
70
day
sp
ost
-gra
intr
eatm
ent
(wit
hin
each
sto
rag
ep
erio
dm
ean
sfo
llo
wed
by
the
sam
ele
tter
are
no
tsi
gn
ifica
ntl
yd
iffe
ren
t;H
SD
test
atP
=5
%)
Tre
atm
ents
Sto
rag
ep
erio
ds
(day
s)
03
06
09
01
20
15
01
80
21
02
40
27
0
DE
12
.11
±2
.13
de
19
.30
±1
.43
de
16
.15
±3
.11
d1
2.4
9±
1.6
1d
e7
.56
±2
.54
cde
5.1
5±
2.2
1cd
1.3
3±
1.1
5c
0.0
0±
1.1
5a
0.0
0±
0.0
0a
0.0
0±
0.0
0a
Th
i3
8.0
2±
1.5
7c
40
.49
±2
.00
c3
3.5
9±
2.8
7b
c2
5.4
7±
2.9
2b
c1
8.1
1±
1.7
3b
c7
.41
±2
.67
cd2
.51
±1
.99
c0
.47
±1
.35
a0
.15
±1
.12
a0
.17
±1
.24
a
F1
5.1
6±
2.0
3e
9.0
1±
1.1
6e
11
.07
±2
.08
de
7.6
3±
1.6
9e
4.4
1±
1.2
9e
2.2
3±
2.1
5d
0.2
8±
0.0
5d
0.1
2±
2.1
1a
0.4
9±
1.3
6a
0.0
0±
0.0
0a
F2
10
.36
±2
.47
de
16
.51
±0
.86
de
18
.85
±1
.48
d1
4.3
5±
2.6
5cd
e1
0.5
7±
1.3
7cd
e9
.67
±2
.56
bcd
4.5
9±
2.1
6b
c2
.53
±1
.15
a0
.17
±0
.26
a0
.00
±0
.00
a
DE
?T
hi
71
.37
±2
.23
a7
0.6
9±
2.8
0a
54
.08
±3
.37
a4
3.1
9±
3.0
8a
35
.02
±2
.49
a2
1.6
1±
3.6
4ab
13
.59
±1
.64
a7
.29
±2
.24
a1
.69
±1
.11
a0
.15
±1
.31
a
DE
?F
19
.15
±2
.13
de
14
.52
±1
.43
de
12
.82
±2
.20
d9
.62
±1
.42
de
6.5
1±
2.1
5d
e3
.28
±1
.83
d2
.03
±0
.77
c0
.65
±1
.18
a0
.00
±0
.00
a0
.00
±0
.00
a
DE
?F
21
7.1
2±
2.8
0d
25
.44
±3
.30
d2
3.4
0±
2.3
9cd
20
.31
±1
.56
cd1
7.0
8±
1.3
1b
cd1
2.1
0±
2.3
6b
cd7
.48
±0
.19
abc
3.1
9±
1.2
7a
1.1
8±
1.2
4a
0.0
0±
0.0
0a
Th
i?
F1
42
.54
±2
.47
c4
6.6
2±
3.0
7b
c4
1.6
8±
3.1
0ab
32
.57
±2
.78
ab2
4.4
9±
1.9
9ab
17
.54
±0
.40
abc
6.6
2±
1.1
5ab
c3
.55
±0
.99
a0
.00
±0
.00
a0
.66
±1
.25
a
Th
i?
F2
54
.36
±0
.96
b5
7.4
2±
2.1
8b
52
.62
±2
.66
a4
0.3
6±
3.4
2a
31
.64
±3
.47
a2
5.2
7±
3.2
7a
11
.52
±2
.43
ab5
.44
±1
.43
a2
.37
±1
.62
a0
.00
±0
.00
a
Ta
ble
3M
ean
mo
rtal
ity
(±S
E)
of
R.
do
min
ica
adu
lts
exp
ose
dfo
r7
day
so
nw
hea
ttr
eate
dw
ith
on
e-d
ose
rate
of
DE
(20
0p
pm
),th
iam
eth
ox
am(0
.5p
pm
),tw
o-d
ose
rate
so
fB
.b
ass
ian
a(F
1:
1.5
91
06;
F2
:1
.59
10
8co
nid
ia/k
g),
and
thei
rre
spec
tiv
eco
mb
inat
ion
sin
10
sto
rag
ep
erio
ds
con
du
cted
fro
m0
to2
70
day
sp
ost
-gra
intr
eatm
ent
(wit
hin
each
sto
rag
ep
erio
dm
ean
sfo
llo
wed
by
the
sam
ele
tter
are
no
tsi
gn
ifica
ntl
yd
iffe
ren
t;H
SD
test
atP
=5
%)
Tre
atm
ents
Sto
rage
per
iods
(day
s)
030
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
DE
62.0
0±
1.9
5de
68.6
7±
1.7
3cd
65.6
7±
1.7
3cd
57.6
7±
1.9
7b
51.2
8±
1.9
6ab
43.1
8±
1.4
2ac
d35.1
8±
1.4
2bcd
31.3
2±
2.1
9bc
26.5
2±
1.9
3bc
21.5
6±
1.6
1bc
Thi
87.0
6±
2.1
6ab
85.4
9±
3.3
0ab
74.6
0±
2.6
5ab
c61.7
9±
3.6
2ab
47.7
0±
2.5
3bc
38.7
5±
3.2
0bcd
24.6
2±
2.8
6def
15.5
7±
1.7
8de
10.4
3±
1.2
7de
4.2
6±
3.2
6e
F1
43.1
8±
1.5
2f
41.4
3±
1.8
2e
46.6
7±
1.9
5e
35.0
6±
2.6
0d
26.3
5±
4.1
1d
22.1
0±
2.2
1e
17.0
4±
2.0
2f
12.6
8±
0.8
2e
5.4
9±
1.9
4e
2.5
9±
1.9
1e
F2
72.0
3±
2.5
6cd
75.3
4±
2.4
1bc
71.4
3±
2.0
3bc
65.8
2±
2.9
1ab
54.4
6±
2.8
2ab
46.2
1±
2.5
0ab
c41.1
7±
2.1
9ab
c36.4
7±
2.4
8ab
30.3
3±
2.4
9ab
23.3
5±
3.6
7ab
DE
?T
hi
95.3
5±
1.6
9a
91.6
5±
2.0
6a
84.1
0±
2.5
6a
73.0
9±
1.9
7a
58.3
8±
1.9
6ab
47.3
4±
2.6
8ab
c36.7
4±
1.7
5bc
19.1
6±
2.1
5de
13.4
5±
1.7
8de
7.5
6±
2.9
2de
DE
?F
154.0
7±
1.9
8e
57.3
4±
2.5
7d
53.3
4±
2.4
8e
42.4
1±
1.7
7cd
34.1
4±
3.7
9cd
29.0
8±
1.9
7de
21.8
8±
2.4
6ef
17.6
0±
2.3
6de
12.2
5±
1.5
6de
9.2
±1.3
9cd
e
DE
?F
281.2
1±
2.4
8bc
83.0
6±
2.4
1ab
80.2
7±
1.7
3ab
71.3
3±
2.2
8a
63.2
5±
3.6
4a
54.0
1±
2.4
4a
50.1
6±
1.9
2a
43.3
0±
3.6
1a
38.1
1±
1.1
2a
34.3
2±
2.8
4a
Thi
?F
165.3
4±
1.7
2d
61.6
8±
2.6
6d
58.0
1±
2.4
1de
53.6
7±
2.6
7bc
45.1
3±
3.1
3bc
37.6
9±
2.9
5cd
32.5
5±
2.5
1cd
e25.1
6±
2.6
7cd
19.1
4±
2.0
1cd
12.2
5±
2.8
8bcd
e
Thi
?F
292.3
0±
2.4
7a
87.2
1±
2.5
8ab
83.6
2±
2.0
4a
74.2
9±
2.4
9a
64.0
6±
2.5
0a
51.2
5±
1.5
6ab
46.3
5±
2.7
5ab
34.4
2±
1.1
6ab
c23.0
7±
2.2
4bc
18.2
1±
1.9
1
344 J Pest Sci (2012) 85:341–350
123
analysis using General Linear Model of SAS (1999). The
dose rates and storage periods were the main effects while
adult mortality was the response variable. For progeny
production, the number of emerged adults was the response
variable whereas the storage periods and the dose rates
were the main effects. The means were separated with the
Tukey–Kramer test (HSD) at a = 0.05 (Sokal and Rohlf
1995).
Results
Radial growth test
The dose rates significantly affected the B. bassiana growth
on SDA plates for each incubation day (D2: F3,11 = 10.8,
P B 0.01; D4: F3,11 = 5.72, P = 0.02; D6: F3,11 = 5.45,
P = 0.02). The differences in mm growth by low- and
medium-dose rates of thimethoxam (0.25 and 0.5 ppm)
were not significantly different from that of control and the
highest-radial growth was observed after 6 days of incu-
bation (Fig. 1).
Adult mortality after 48 h exposure
The main effects and their associated interaction were sig-
nificant (Table 1). The adult mortality generally decreased
with increasing storage period. During the first bioassay, the
lowest mortality (5.16%) of the beetles was at the lowest-
dose rate of B. bassiana, whereas the greatest mortality
(71.37%) was in the grains treated with the combined
application of DE and thiamethoxam. At 60 days, the mean
mortality percentage was either increased or remained same
for all treatments with the exception of thiamethoxam alone
for which the mortality rapidly decreased with increasing
storage period (Table 2). The addition of DE increased
mortality with both thiamethoxam and B. bassiana. For
combined treatments, B. bassiana mixed with thiamethoxam
gave higher mortalities than B bassiana mixed with DE.
Adult mortality after 7 day exposure
The main effects and their associated interaction was sig-
nificant (Table 1). There were significant differences
among all treatments but mortalities decreased with the
extending storage period. The highest-adult mortalities
were at 0.5 ppm of thiamethoxam alone or in combination
with 200 ppm of DE during at 30 days of storage
(Table 3). The mortality with DE alone showed little var-
iation up to 60 days of storage and then declined succes-
sively after each additional storage period. Almost the
same trend was followed by the other treatments except for
thiamethoxam alone and its combined treatments for which Ta
ble
4M
ean
mo
rtal
ity
(±S
E)
of
R.
do
min
ica
adu
lts
exp
ose
dfo
r1
4d
ays
on
wh
eat
trea
ted
wit
ho
ne-
do
sera
teo
fD
E(2
00
pp
m),
thia
met
ho
xam
(0.5
pp
m),
two
-do
sera
tes
of
B.
ba
ssia
na
(F1
:
1.5
91
06;
F2
:1
.59
10
8co
nid
ia/k
g),
and
thei
rre
spec
tiv
eco
mb
inat
ion
sin
10
sto
rag
ep
erio
ds
con
du
cted
fro
m0
to2
70
day
sp
ost
-gra
intr
eatm
ent
(wit
hin
each
sto
rag
ep
erio
dm
ean
sfo
llo
wed
by
the
sam
ele
tter
are
no
tsi
gn
ifica
ntl
yd
iffe
ren
t;H
SD
test
atP
=5
%)
Tre
atm
ents
Sto
rage
per
iods
(day
s)
030
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
DE
83.4
8±
2.5
3cd
80.1
0±
2.4
8de
82.3
1±
2.5
5ab
c74.2
4±
3.7
8bcd
72.7
2±
1.8
3ab
67.3
5±
2.6
2ab
63.1
9±
2.1
3a
57.2
1±
2.6
355.9
8±
3.4
3ab
54.4
7±
2.9
5ab
Thi
96.3
1±
2.1
5ab
92.8
6±
3.0
1ab
c86.0
4±
2.1
9ab
72.3
2±
1.8
4cd
61.1
2±
2.6
9bc
49.1
1±
2.7
6cd
35.6
4±
3.4
7cd
26.7
2±
3.0
118.3
5±
3.2
7d
12.3
3±
1.3
9e
F1
64.4
2±
2.4
0e
60.3
4±
2.3
3f
58.2
1±
2.1
0d
47.1
4±
1.6
9e
42.3
3±
2.3
0d
38.3
8±
2.4
9d
32.2
8±
4.1
4d
29.0
8±
3.3
625.2
8±
3.2
0cd
23.7
0±
3.4
7de
F2
89.0
3±
2.6
2ab
c87.2
3±
1.5
2bcd
85.1
0±
3.1
8ab
80.1
7±
2.4
6ab
c78.2
0±
2.7
2a
73.4
2±
2.9
5a
71.0
6±
2.6
6a
66.1
6±
1.7
463.5
1±
3.0
2ab
57.7
5±
3.6
4a
DE
?T
hi
100.0
0±
0.0
0a
100.0
0±
0.0
0a
92.5
0±
2.0
8a
87.2
9±
2.5
7a
65.0
1±
2.2
9bc
59.7
8±
2.7
3bc
46.2
7±
2.6
5bc
43.2
9±
2.6
435.5
2±
2.9
0c
31.5
2±
3.8
5cd
DE
?F
175.0
9±
3.3
8de
73.7
2±
2.6
5e
70.2
7±
2.1
7cd
62.3
2±
2.4
5d
57.2
1±
2.4
0c
51.2
4±
3.7
0cd
42.6
9±
3.1
2bcd
38.0
8±
2.8
132.4
8±
1.9
7cd
27.6
1±
0.3
3d
DE
?F
292.3
4±
2.0
4ab
c90.1
9±
1.4
3ab
cd88.0
6±
3.1
6ab
83.4
2±
2.3
8ab
c81.0
6±
2.6
4a
78.0
0±
2.9
6a
75.5
8±
2.4
6a
72.6
1±
2.6
069.7
6±
2.4
1a
64.0
0±
3.0
2a
Thi
?F
186.3
7±
2.7
9bcd
83.5
5±
2.5
0cd
e79.1
2±
2.5
1bc
67.1
7±
2.9
0d
63.7
1±
2.1
7bc
55.1
5±
1.8
6bc
47.4
0±
2.6
2b
41.3
7±
2.5
133.4
5±
2.6
3c
29.6
3±
2.9
5cd
Thi
?F
298.0
2±
1.4
8a
95.4
4±
1.7
9ab
90.0
1±
2.2
3ab
86.4
6±
2.8
9a
82.4
1±
2.9
2a
74.0
7±
2.0
6a
68.0
7±
2.4
0a
60.8
2±
3.1
654.3
4±
3.3
1b
42.8
4±
2.5
1bc
J Pest Sci (2012) 85:341–350 345
123
decline initiated after 30 days (Table 3). Here again, the
combination treatments were the most effective compared
with the individual treatments.
Adult mortality after 14 day exposure
The main effects and their associated interaction was sig-
nificant (Table 1). The adult mortality rates were higher in
all treated units than after 7 days of exposure but the
decreasing trend of mortality with storage period was same.
The adult mortality reached 100% for DE and thiameth-
oxam together at 0 and 30 days of storage while the lowest
mortality at the beginning of storage (64.42%) was in the
grain treated with lowest-fungal dose rate (Table 4). Like
48 h and 7 day exposure intervals, there was a very gradual,
steady decline in mortality with DE with successive storage
periods resulting in[50% mortality even after 150 days of
storage not only in the units treated with DE alone but also
where it was mixed with B. bassiana.
The slopes for adult mortality levels determined by
regression equations during storage period were not similar
for the different treatments. For all treatments, the decline
in mortality levels with increased storage time was
observed, with coefficients between 0.96 and 0.99 (Fig. 2).
Progeny production
There were significant differences for main (storage periods:
F9,299 = 555.31, P B 0.01; treatments: F9,299 = 1566.40,
P B 0.01) and their associated interaction (F81,299 = 10.23,
P B 0.01). The progeny emergence was highly suppressed
in treated grain compared with untreated. The fewest
emerged adults were in the grain treated with combined
application of DE ? thiamethoxam or thiamethoxam with
higher dose rate of B. bassiana. On the other hand, the sup-
pression was reduced gradually and more F1 adults were
recorded with extended storage period (Table 5).
Mycosis and sporulation
The highest mycosis (93.25%) and sporulation (287.25
conidia/ml) was at 30 days for the treatments where
B. bassiana was applied at the dose rate of 1.5 9 106
conidia/kg. The mycosis and sporulation declined with the
prolonged storage, the lowest rates of mycosis (4.33%) and
sporulation (28.14%) were during the last sample period in
the grain with thiamethoxam mixed with B. bassiana.
The decreased rate of mycosis and sporulation with
increased storage time was also significant in all regression
models (Figs. 3, 4). The slopes for mycosis determined by
regression equations during the storage period were similar for
the conidiation. Among different treatments, the observed
difference for mycosis with coefficients was between 0.93 and
0.99, while in case of conidiation variation between 0.87 and
0.99 was observed.
Discussion
The prolongation of protection is very important consid-
eration when insect management tactics are to be designed
for stored products. The findings of our experiments indi-
cate that DE, B. bassiana, and thiamethoxam can be
applied successfully against R. dominica but their efficacy
varies depending upon the dose rates and exposure interval.
The decline in the efficacy of DE and entomopathogenic
fungi occurs slowly compared with thiamethoxam. Among
the advantages of DE, the most important one is the inert
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Storage period (months)
Mor
talit
y (%
)
DE Thi F1 F2 DE+Thi DE+F1 DE+F2 Thi+F1 Thi+F2
Fig. 2 Mean mortality of R. dominica adults exposed for 14 days on
grain treated with DE, thiamethoxam, B. bassiana, and their respective
combinations for 9 months. Lines represent linear regression equations
fitted to the data for each treatment (DE: y = -3.599x ? 88.902,
R2 = 0.9653; Thi: y = -10.279x ? 111.62, R2 = 0.989; F1:
y = -4.8846x ? 68.985, R2 = 0.9761; F2: y = -3.4808x ? 94.312,
R2 = 0.9889; DE ? Thi: y = -8.7389x ? 114.19, R2 = 0.965;
DE ? F1: y = -5.7074x ? 84.465, R2 = 0.989; DE ? F2: y =
-3.0102x ? 95.962, R2 = 0.992; Thi ? F1: y = -6.7502x ? 95.739,
R2 = 0.9927; Thi ? F2: y = -6.0417x ? 108.38, R2 = 0.9759)
346 J Pest Sci (2012) 85:341–350
123
nature and stability in the treated materials. In this study,
DE provided a good control of the test species and
remained stable even after 270 days of storage. The grad-
ual decrease in its effectiveness may be attributed primarily
to the environmental conditions, specifically the relative
humidity during the storage period and secondarily to the
grain oil absorption by DE particles (Subramanyam and
Roesli 2000). The DE particles absorb moisture from the
air when in contact for prolonged period of time with high-
relative humidity which reduces its efficacy (Fields and
Korunic 2000; Arthur 2002). It has been demonstrated that
DE products (Dryacide and Protect-It) were more effective
at 50% than at 60% r.h. (Stathers et al. 2004); similarly,
Vayias and Athanassiou (2004) also reported reduced
effectiveness of SilicoSec at 65% than at 55% r.h. Some
earlier studies have shown reduced performance of DE
over time (Stathers et al. 2002; Athanassiou et al. 2005).
McGaughey (1972) exhibited that aged deposits of Perma-
Guard (DE formulation) were less effective than fresh
deposits, and the results were attributed to oil absorption by
DE particles.
At least in laboratory studies, B. bassiana has been
utilized with success against R. dominica (Rice and Cog-
burn 1999; Batta 2005; Lord 2001, 2005, 2009). In the
current study, the integration of B. bassiana of DE and the
neonicotinoid, thiamethoxam showed their potential for
long-term grain protection. The presence of DE in grains
not only increased the levels of adult mortality but also
enhanced the residual effectiveness of B. bassiana. This
was more obvious at higher fungal concentrations. The
reduced efficacy of B. bassiana applied at the low-dose rate
with DE could be due to the ‘‘critical conidial concentra-
tion’’ needed to exhibit the additive effect (Vassilakos et al.
2006). Persistence is also a desirable characteristic for
microbial insecticides (Thomas and Jenkins 1997) for
adaptation as insect pest management tools. We found that
the test fungus at its high-application rate not only proved
effective but relatively more stable compared with DE
alone. Similar to DE, there was a gradual decrease in
fungal efficacy with increasing storage period. Athanassiou
et al. (2008) reported a steady decline in the efficacy of
M. aniospliae against S. oryzae and R. dominica over
period of 6 months. Similarly, Moore et al. (2000) noted
conidial viability decreases over time and these findings are
in accordance with our results. The reduction in mortality
was associated with a reduction in mycosis, as expected.
This is the first report of integration of thiamethoxmam
with DE and B. bassiana for the management of R. dom-
inica. The thiamethoxam yielded the highest-mortality
rates up to 30 days of storage, but the effectiveness sharply
declined after that period and caused the least mortality
among all treatments at 270 days. The results indicate that
thiamethoxam is less stable than DE and B. bassiana. TheTa
ble
5M
ean
nu
mb
er(±
SE
)o
fR
.d
om
inic
ao
ffsp
rin
gp
rod
uce
din
wh
eat
trea
ted
wit
ho
ne-
do
sera
teo
fD
E(2
00
pp
m),
thia
met
ho
xam
(0.5
pp
m),
two
-do
sera
tes
of
B.
ba
ssia
na
(F1
:1
.59
10
6;
F2
:1
.59
10
8co
nid
ia/k
g),
and
thei
rre
spec
tiv
eco
mb
inat
ion
sin
10
sto
rag
ep
erio
ds
con
du
cted
fro
m0
to2
70
day
sp
ost
-gra
intr
eatm
ent
(wit
hin
each
sto
rag
ep
erio
dm
ean
sfo
llo
wed
by
the
sam
e
lett
erar
en
ot
sig
nifi
can
tly
dif
fere
nt;
HS
Dte
stat
P=
5%
)
Tre
atm
ents
Sto
rage
per
iods
(day
s)
030
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
DE
3.1
6±
0.3
0cd
5.4
1±
1.0
1bc
4.5
8±
1.3
7cd
e7.4
1±
1.5
8bc
9.2
5±
1.8
0cd
10.1
6±
1.2
5de
12.0
8±
2.1
6fg
14.5
8±
2.5
6ef
18.8
3±
1.2
4ef
20.2
5±
2.2
6ef
Thi
0.0
0±
0.0
0d
0.0
0±
0.0
0c
3.5
0±
1.8
2cd
e9.2
5±
2.4
4bc
13.0
8±
1.2
4bc
19.4
1±
2.2
6b
26.1
6±
4.2
3b
30.5
0±
1.5
4b
36.0
8±
2.6
7b
43.1
6±
5.6
8b
F1
8.2
5±
1.2
3b
6.5
8±
2.1
5b
11.2
5±
0.9
4b
12.0
8±
1.7
3b
19.0
0±
1.3
2b
22.5
0±
1.2
7b
24.7
5±
3.7
5bc
27.2
5±
1.2
7bc
32.4
1±
1.9
6bc
36.7
5±
5.2
3bc
F2
2.0
8±
1.1
5cd
5.2
5±
1.5
2bc
3.7
5±
1.4
4cd
e8.0
0±
1.6
4bc
10.5
8±
1.2
0cd
9.5
8±
1.7
6e
15.1
6±
3.2
5ef
17.1
6±
2.4
7ef
16.7
5±
0.8
7ef
18.0
8±
1.9
4f
DE
?T
hi
0.0
0±
0.0
0d
0.0
0±
0.0
0c
0.0
0±
0.0
0e
2.4
1±
1.8
4c
5.0
8±
1.3
6d
12.4
1±
2.1
1cd
e18.2
5±
1.3
4cd
ef19.0
8±
3.2
1de
24.5
8±
3.4
1cd
e28.2
5±
2.3
6cd
e
DE
?F
15.4
1±
1.6
2bc
4.3
3±
1.1
6bc
7.3
3±
1.3
7bcd
11.5
8±
0.9
1b
12.2
5±
0.7
2c
16.2
5±
1.5
8bcd
22.4
1±
2.2
5bcd
26.2
5±
1.8
9bcd
29.4
1±
3.5
6bcd
34.1
6±
2.0
7bcd
DE
?F
20.0
0±
0.0
0d
1.1
6±
0.7
2bc
3.1
6±
1.1
5cd
e5.7
5±
1.8
5bc
4.8
3±
1.1
5d
7.5
8±
1.6
7e
8.4
1±
2.6
5g
11.0
8±
0.9
4f
13.3
3±
2.4
3f
16.3
3±
3.1
2f
Thi
?F
12.1
6±
2.0
4cd
3.4
1±
1.5
5bc
8.0
8±
1.2
0bc
10.4
1±
0.8
0bc
15.4
1±
0.8
2bc
18.3
3±
2.4
5bc
20.0
8±
3.4
5bcd
e25.1
6±
4.2
2bcd
28.2
5±
4.7
6bcd
31.0
8±
2.6
5cd
Thi
?F
20.0
0±
0.0
0d
0.0
0±
0.0
0c
1.5
8±
1.1
6de
3.0
8±
1.5
8c
5.1
6±
1.3
0d
8.2
5±
1.2
8e
17.5
0±
2.6
6def
20.0
8±
1.9
4cd
e21.0
8±
2.1
7de
25.4
1±
2.1
3def
Contr
ol
42.5
8±
4.2
0a
50.6
5±
2.6
7a
52.0
8±
2.3
9a
55.1
6±
1.1
6a
64.4
1±
1.0
8a
73.0
8±
6.2
1a
74.0
8±
4.3
5a
85.1
6±
5.3
5a
86.1
6±
7.2
6a
92.2
5±
6.2
8a
F199
143
136
89.2
205
228
196
209
150
144
PB
0.0
1B
0.0
1B
0.0
1B
0.0
1B
0.0
1B
0.0
1B
0.0
1B
0.0
1B
0.0
1B
0.0
1
J Pest Sci (2012) 85:341–350 347
123
presence of residues sometimes is advantageous for long-
term protection of stored commodity. Thiamethoxam
degrades rapidly as suggested by Soliman (2011) who
found that initial deposits of thiamethoxam on cowpea
pods showed the least residual activity of any of the tested
insecticides. The combined treatment of thiamethoxam
with DE and B. bassisna has not been reported for stored
products. de Oliveira et al. (2003) found that thiamethoxam
at its lower application rates (half of the field recom-
mended) caused no inhibitory effect on radial growth of B.
bassiana conidia, and Neves et al. (2001) reported that
thiamethoxam along with certain other neonicotinoid
insecticides had no effect on the conidial germination,
conidiogenesis and vegetative growth of B. bassiana.
Similar observations have been made during the current
research and the simultaneous presence of thiamethoxam
with B. bassiana also increased the adult mortality com-
pared with their respective individual treatments during
initial storage periods.
The suppression of progeny production is as important a
parameter as the adult mortality in order to minimize grain
damage by insect pests. During current studies, each of
three control strategies been tested suppressed the progeny
production of R. dominica effectively. Entomopathogenic
fungi and DEs are slow acting insecticides particularly
compared with certain chemical insecticides, therefore,
insects may recover and move to less treated layers of grain
and thus may continue to cause the grain damage. The
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Storage period (months)
Myc
osis
(%
)
F1 F2 DE+F1 DE+F2 Thi+F1 Thi+F2
Fig. 3 Mycosis in cadavers of R. dominica adults treated with B.bassiana alone and mixed with DE and thiamethoxam for 9 months.
Lines represent linear regression equations fitted to the data for each
treatment (F1: y = -5.6832x ? 97.375, R2 = 0.9856; F2:
y = -5.7937x ? 89.762, R2 = 0.965; DE ? F1: y = -6.2995x ?
87.779, R2 = 0.9978; DE ? F2: y = -7.0615x ? 83.989, R2 =
0.9784; Thi ? F1: y = -6.648x ? 70.473, R2 = 0.9802; Thi ? F2:
y = -6.0947x ? 59.091, R2 = 0.936)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Storage period (months)
Spor
ulat
ion
(con
idia
/ml)
F1 F2 DE+F1 DE+F2 Thi+F1 Thi+F2
Fig. 4 Sporulation of R. dominica cadavers treated with B. bassianaalone and mixed with DE and thiamethoxam for 9 months. Linesrepresent linear regression equations fitted to the data for each treatment
(F1: y = -14.427x ? 306.19, R2 = 0.9925; F2: y = -15.045x ?
282.35, R2 = 0.8701; DE ? F1: y = -14.127x ? 229.04, R2 =
0.9895; DE ? F2: y = -12.877x ? 188.34, R2 = 0.9868; Thi ? F1:
y = -11.704x ? 166.87, R2 = 0.9946; Thi ? F2: y = -11.983x ?
145.51, R2 = 0.9976)
348 J Pest Sci (2012) 85:341–350
123
reduced number of emerged adults in combination com-
pared with separate treatments during initial storage peri-
ods may be correlated with the higher mortality
percentages in the tested treatments.
The results of this study suggested that B. bassiana can
be used effectively with DE and thiamethoxam against
R. dominica by exhibiting additive effect, but despite the
high effectiveness of thiamethoxam, it is not capable of
long-term protection of stored wheat. Thiamethoxam has
been used as a seed treatment for various field crops. The
grain protection ability of thiamethoxam has been discussed
by Arthur et al. (2004) who suggested it as a candidate for
wheat and maize seed protection. Some other insecticides
commonly used for field crops, urban, and veterinary insect
pests control have also been evaluated for their possible
effect as grain protectants. For example, fipronil, an insec-
ticidal pyrazol commonly used against the insect pests of
field crops, was also tested for the control of stored product
insects and found to be highly effective (Kavallieratos et al.
2010). The results presented here indicate that further
studies are justified to reduce the application rates of thia-
methoxam so that it could be used in post-harvest IPM
programs and registered as grain protectant.
Acknowledgments We would like to thanks Prof. Dr. Christos G.
Athanassiou, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece and Dr. Jeffrey C.
Lord, USDA-ARS, Center for Grain and Animal Health Research,
Manhattan, Kansas, USA for helpful comments on the draft of the
manuscript. This publication is the product of research project funded
by the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Islamabad, Pakistan
(074-2407-Av4-128).
References
Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an
insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267
Adane K, Moore D, Archer SA (1996) Preliminary studies on the use
of Beauveria bassiana to control Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera:
Curculinoidae) in the laboratory. J Stored Prod Res 32:105–113
Arthur FH (1999) Knockdown, mortality and progeny production of
lesser grain borers (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and rice weevils
(Coleoptera: Curculionidae) exposed for short intervals on wheat
treated with cyfluthrin. J Econ Entomol 92:1198–1205
Arthur FH (2002) Survival of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) on wheat treated
with diatomaceous earth: impact of biological and environmental
parameters on product efficacy. J Stored Prod Res 38:305–313
Arthur FH, Yue B, Wilde GE (2004) Susceptibility of stored-product
beetles on wheat and maize treated with thiamethoxam: effects
of concentration, exposure interval, and temperature. J Stored
Prod Res 40:527–546
Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG, Economou LP, Dimizas CB,
Vayias BJ, Tomanovic S, Milutinovic M (2005) Persistence and
efficacy of three diatomaceous earth formulations against
Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on wheat and
barley. J Econ Entomol 98:1404–1412
Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG, Vayias BJ, Tsakiri JB, Mikeli NH,
Meletsis CM, Tomanovic Z (2008) Persistence and efficacy of
Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin (Deuteromycotina:
Hyphomycetes) and diatomaceous earth against Sitophilus oryzae(L.) (Coleoptera: Curculinoidae) and Rhyzopertha dominica (F.)
(Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) on wheat and maize. Crop Prot
27:1303–1311
Barnett HL, Hunter BB (1998) Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi.
APS Press, Minnesota
Batta YA (2005) Control of the lesser grain borer (Rhyzoperthadominica (F.), Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) by treatments with
residual formulations of Merarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff)
Sorokin (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes). J Econ Entomol
41:221–229
Choi YW, Hyde KD, Ho WH (1999) Single spore isolation of fungi.
Fungal Div 3:29–38
Collins DA, Cook DA (1998) Periods of protection provided by
different formulations of pirimiphos-methyl and etrimos, when
admixed with wheat against four susceptible storage beetle pests.
Crop Prot 17:521–528
de Oliveira CN, Neves PMOJ, Kawazoe LS (2003) Compatibility
between the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana and
insecticides used in coffee plantations. Sci Agric 60:663–667
Ebeling W (1971) Sorptive dusts for pest control. Ann Rev Entomol
16:123–158
Fields PG, Korunic Z (2000) The effect of grain moisture content and
temperature on the efficacy of diatomaceous earths from
different geographical locations against stored-product beetles.
J Stored Prod Res 36:1–13
Greenspan L (1977) Humidity fixed points of binary saturated
aqueous solutions. J Res Natl Bur Stand A 81:89–96
Hofer D, Brandl F (1999) Cruiser/Cruiser performance features of
thiamethoxam as a seed treatment in worldwide cotton. Proc
Beltwide Cotton Conf Memphis 2:1101–1104
Kavallieratos NG, Athanassiou CG, Vayias BJ, Mihail SB, Tomano-
vic Z (2009) Insecticidal efficacy of abamectin against three
stored-product insect pests: influence of dose rate, temperature,
commodity, and exposure interval. J Econ Entomol 102:
1352–1359
Kavallieratos NG, Athanassiou CG, Vayias BJ, Betsi PCC (2010)
Insecticidal efficacy of fipronil against four stored-product insect
pests: influence of commodity, dose, exposure interval, relative
humidity and temperature. Pest Manag Sci 66(6):640–649
Kljajic P, Peric I (2009) Residual effects of deltamethrin and
malathion on different populations of Sitophilus granarius (L.)
on treated wheat grains. J Stored Prod Res 45:45–48
Lawson DS, Dunbar DM, White SM, Ngo N (1999) Actara 25 WG:
control of cotton pests with a new neonicotinoid insecticide,
thiamethoxam. Proc Beltwide Cotton Conf Memphis 2:1106–1109
Lord JC (2001) Desiccant dusts synergize the effect of Beavueriabassiana (Hyphomycetes: Moniliales) on stored grain beetles.
J Econ Entomol 94:367–372
Lord JC (2005) Low humidity, moderate temperature, and desiccant
dust favor efficacy of Beauveria bassiana (Hyphomycetes:
Moniliales) for the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica(Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Biol Control 34:180–186
Lord JC (2009) Beauveria bassiana infection of eggs of stored-
product beetles. Entomol Res 39:155–157
McGaughey WH (1972) Diatomaceous earth for confused flour beetle
and rice weevil control in rough, brown and milled rice. J Econ
Entomol 65:1427–1428
Meienfisch P, Huerlimann H, Rindlisbache A, Gsell L, Dettwiler H,
Haettenschiller J, Sieger J, Walti M (2001) The discovery of
thiamethoxam: a second generation of neonicotinoid. Pest
Manag Sci 57:165–176
Meikle WG, Cherry AJ, Holst N, Hounna B, Markham RH (2001) The
effects of an entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana(Balsamo) Vuillemin (Hyphomycetes), on Prostephanus trunca-tus (Horn) (Col.: Bostrichidae), Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky
J Pest Sci (2012) 85:341–350 349
123
(Col.: Curculinoidae) and grain losses in stored maize in the Benin
Republic. J Invertebr Pathol 77:198–205
Michalaki MP, Athanassiou CG, Kavallierateos NG, Batta YA,
Balotis GN (2006) Effectiveness of Metarhizium anisopliae(Metschinkoff) Sorokin applied alone or in combination with
diatomaceous earth against Tribolium confusum Du Val larvae:
influence of temperature, relative humidity and type of com-
modity. Crop Prot 25:418–425
Moore D, Lord JC, Smith SM (2000) Pathogens. In: Subramanyam
BH, Hagstrum DW (eds) Alternatives to pesticides in stored-
product IPM. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 193–227
Neves PMOJ, Hirose E, Tchujo PT, Moino A Jr (2001) Compatibility
of entomopathogenic fungi with neonicotinoid insecticides.
Neotrop Entomol 30:263–268
Riasat T, Wakil W, Ashfaq M, Sahi ST (2011) Effect of Beauveriabassiana mixed with diatomaceous earth on mortality, mycosis
and sporulation of Rhyzopertha dominica on stored wheat.
Phytoparasitica 39:325–331
Rice WC, Cogburn RR (1999) Activity of the entomopathogenic
fungus Beauveria bassiana (Deuteromycota: Hyphomycetes)
against three coleopteran pests of stored grain. J Econ Entomol
92:691–694
Russell CW, Ugine TA, Hajek AE (2010) Interaction between
imidacloprid and Metarhizium brunneum on adult Asian long-
horned beetles (Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky))
(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J Invertebr Pathol 105:305–311
SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide, 8th edn. SAS Institute,
Cary
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freedman and
Company, New York
Soliman MMM (2011) Persistence of new insecticides and their
efficacy against insect pests of cowpea. Aust J Basic Appl Sci
5:82–89
Stathers TE, Mvumib BM, Golob P (2002) Field assessment of the
efficacy and persistence of diatomaceous earths in protecting
stored grain on small-scale farms in Zimbabwe. Crop Prot 21:
1033–1048
Stathers TE, Denniff M, Golob P (2004) The efficacy and persistence
of diatomaceous earths admixed with commodity against four
tropical stored product beetle pests. J Stored Prod Res 40:113123
Subramanyam BH, Roesli R (2000) Inert dusts. In: Subramanyam B,
Hagstrum DW (eds) Alternatives to pesticides in stored-product
IPM. Kluwer Academic, Boston, pp 321–380
Subramanyan BH, Hagstrum DW (1996) Resistance measurement
and management. In: Subramanyam BH, Hagstrum DW (eds)
Integrated management of insects in stored products. Marcel
Dekker, New York, pp 331–397
Thomas MB, Jenkins NE (1997) Effects of temperature on growth of
Metarhizium flavoviride and virulence to the variegated grass-
hopper, Zonocerus variegatus. Mycol Res 101:1469–1474
Vassilakos TN, Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NK, Vayias BJ (2006)
Influence of temperature on the insecticidal effect of Beauveriabassiana in combination with diatomaceous earth against
Rhyzopertha dominica and Sitophilus oryzae on stored wheat.
Biol Control 38:270–281
Vayias BJ, Athanassiou CG (2004) Factors affecting the insecticidal
efficacy of the diatomaceous earth formulation SilicoSec against
adults and larvae of the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusumDu Val (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Crop Prot 23:565–573
Vayias BJ, Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG, Tsesmeli CD,
Buchelos CTh (2006) Persistence and efficacy of two diatoma-
ceous earth formulations and a mixture of diatomaceous earth
with pyrethrum against Tribolium confusum Jacquelin Du Val
(Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on wheat and maize. Pest Manag
Sci 62:456–464
Wakil W, Ghazanfar MU (2010) Entomopathogenic fungus as a
biological control agent against Rhyzopertha dominica F.
(Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) on stored wheat. Arch Phytopathol
Plant Prot 43:1236–1242
Wakil W, Ashfaq M, Ghazanfar MU, Riasat T (2010) Susceptibility
of stored-product insects to enhanced diatomaceous earth.
J Stored Prod Res 46:248–249
Wakil W, Riasat T, Ghazanfar MU, Kwon YJ, Shaheen FA (2011)
Aptness of Beauveria bassiana and enhanced diatomaceous
earth (DEBBM) for control of Rhyzopertha dominica F. Entomol
Res 41:233–241
Yue B, Wilde GE, Arthur F (2003) Evaluation of thiamethoxam and
imidacloprid as seed treatments to control European corn borer
and Indian meal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae. J Econ
Entomol 96:503–509
350 J Pest Sci (2012) 85:341–350
123