Residence Inn by Marriott Stamford, Connecticut

Residence Inn by Marriott Stamford, Connecticut

David Walenga -Structural Option

AE Senior Thesis – April 14, 2004


Topics

Project BackgroundStructural Design Depth StudyBreadth Study 1 : Construction ManagementBreadth Study 2 : Mechanical Design

Questions?

Final Conclusions


Project BackgroundProject Team

Owner/Developer - F.D. Rich CompanyArchitect – BBGM Architects and InteriorsGeneral Contractor – Haynes ConstructionStructural Engineer – Holbert Apple Associates, Inc.M.E.P. – Collective Design Associates, LLCCivil Engineer – Redniss & Mead, Inc.


Building Location


Building Site and UseBuilding SiteStructure replaces a small one story commercial building and is built on the former site of a YMCA. Building UseThe Residence Inn by Marriott is a hotel offering one and two bedroom suites complete with kitchenettes and private baths.


Building Cost

Hotel: $24,947,000

Pre-cast garage: $2,631,000

Total: $27,578,000


Building Size

- 120,000 square feet- 164 guest suites

- 13 occupied floors

- 404 space attached precast parking garage

- 2 mechanical penthouse levels- 1 basement level with pool


Architecture

-Slender-wall cladding system-Cantilevered balconies on floors 9 through 13-Suspended mezzanine level above ground floor-L-shaped plan design, levels on short leg end at 5th floor.


Architecture

Typical One Bedroom Suite

Floor Plans of Typical Suites to come.

Typical Two Bedroom Suite


Project Situation

-Original start date: January 2004-Original completion date: June 2005-Due to budgetary concerns, project construction has been delayed 5 months to allow for the redesign of certain building components in order to lower the overall cost of construction.-Updated start date: June 2004-Updated completion date: November 2005


Topics


Questions?

Final Conclusions


Structural Design Depth StudyOriginal Design

Flat plate concrete gravity systemConcrete moment frame lateral systemFoundation system modifications

Miscellaneous structural items

Design Code change

Conclusions


Original Design

-Gravity System:-Steel framed

superstructure-8” precast concrete hollow-core plank slab with gypcrete topping-Composite steel construction on mezzanine level


Original Design

-Gravity System:

Typical Ball Framing planAnd typical floor plan


Original Design

-Foundation System:

Foundation system described


Original Design

-Lateral System:

Foundation system described, including figures, plans, elevations.


Original Design

-Advantages and Disadvantages:

Table listing advantages and disadvantages.





Design Code change

Conclusions


Design Code Change

-Original Design Code: BOCA 1996-Code for redesign: IBC 2000-Connecticut plans to adopt IBC 2003 in 2005 as the state’s governing code.-IBC 2000 used in lieu of IBC 2003 since it is currently more common.


Effects of Code Change: Wind

-BOCA 96 Basic Wind Speed: 90 mph-IBC 2000 Basic Wind Speed: 110 mph-Five second gust required by IBC 2000-Wind base shear increased by ~30%

-Include Pressure and shear profiles-


Effects of Code Change: Seismic

-Include shear tables-

-Describe code differences-





Design Code change

Conclusions


Flat Plate Concrete System

-Include sections, plans-

-Describe design assumptions--Describe design results-



-System cost, schedule-



-System advantages, disadvantages table-





Design Code change

Conclusions


Concrete Moment Frames

-Describe design assumptions-

-Describe design results-


Concrete Moment Frames

-Table of advantages and disadvantages-





Design Code change

Conclusions


Foundation System

-Describe changes- loss of mats… etc.--Include figure of typical spread ftg.-





Design Code change

Conclusions


Balconies and Mezzanine

-Describe design results-

-Include figure/diagrams-





Design Code change

Conclusions


Conclusions

-Conclusions-

-Include overall comparison chart-


Topics


Questions?

Final Conclusions


Benefits of Delayed Construction

-Describe benefits for delaying-


Costs of Delayed Construction

-Describe costs for delaying-


Conclusions on Decision to Delay

-Conclusions/Recommendation-


Topics


Questions?

Final Conclusions


Original Mechanical System

-Describe original system, including cost and performance-


Redesigned Mechanical System

-Describe new system, including cost and performance-


Recommendation

-Advantages and disadvantages chart--Include recommendation-


Topics


Questions?

Final Conclusions


Final Conclusions

-Recap recommendations/conclusions-


Topics


Questions?

Final Conclusions


Questions?


Thank you to:……

Documents

Residence Inn by Marriott Stamford, Connecticut