Research on USGC

7/21/2019 Research on USGC

1/27

UNIVERSITY OF

SARGODHA

RESEARCH METHODS FOR

BUSINESS

Submitted To:

Ms. Khudaia !a""ai#h

Submitted $%:

M. Asim MCMF13M046

Ad&a& I'ba( MCMF13M037


2/27

Asi) I'ba( MCMF13M049

M.Fa"oo' MCMF13M055

A((ah Ra*ha MCMF13M033

The satis)a#tio& (e+e( o)

stude&ts o) U&i+e"sit% o)

Sa",odha Gu"a&-a(a

am/us


3/27


4/27

0"o/osa(

Obe#ti+es o) the Stud%

The aim of the study is to conduct an investigation to measure the satisfaction level of students

the !ros!ects of the study are that"

i# $cademic satisfaction#

ii# %atisfaction &ith environment#

iii# %atisfaction &ith res!ect to facilities#

Stateme&t o) the 0"ob(em

'hat is the satisfaction level of students of university of %argodha (u)ran&ala cam!us*

S#o/e o) the Stud%

The study measure the ultimate satisfaction level of students of %argodha university (u)ran&ala

cam!us# $nd the findings of this study are only im!lementing on the university of %argodha

(u)ran&ala Cam!us students# This study is most im!ortant +ecause after conducting this

research &e &ill +e a+le to give recommendation and suggestion to the ,niversity of %argodha

(u)ran&ala Cam!us to im!rove the satisfaction level of their students#

Resea"#h Desi,&

%am!ling

The res!ondents of the study &ill consist of students of university of %argodha (u)ran&ala

cam!us# The criteria for the students are that they should at least ta-e study from university for

one semester u!# The reason for this is to ma-e sure that they have enough time to evaluate the

university of %argodha (u)ran&ala cam!us and if it satisfies them# The survey &ill +e conducted

on university cam!us# The sam!ling techni.ue to +e used is convenience sam!ling to ma-e the


5/27

!rocess faster and easier# $!!ro/imately 00 students from different de!artment &ill +e

surveyed#

ata Collection

The survey method2 also -no&n as the .uestionnaire method2 &ill +e used in gathering the data#

%urveys are the most common form of research method for collection of !rimary data# $ self

administered .uestionnaire &ill +e ans&ered#

Time)"ame

$nalysis2 literature revie& and findings &ill +e com!leted &ithin one month#

$ud,et

The +udget for the study is estimated u! to ten thousand $ ru!ees#

$ib(io,"a/h%:

hosravi2 $# $#2 Poushaneh, K., Roozegar, A., & Sohrabifard, N (2012) determination of

factors

affecting students satisfaction#Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science 0138579 5:3

Tessema2M#$#2 ;eady2 M#2 < =u2 '# ' 018 Factors affecting college students satisfaction &ithma)or curriculum#International Journal of Humanities and Social Science>ol# ?o#

$li2 $#2 < $hmad2 @ 0118 ey Factors for etermining %tudents %atisfaction in istance Aearning

Courses contem!orary educational technology2 0112 82 11:134

D, H., & Anazer, ! (201") The im!act of service .uality on student satisfaction and beha#iora

$onse%uen$es in higher edu$aion ser#i$es. International Journal of Economy,

Management and Social Sciences, 68 Bune 0132 ages" :590

etruellis, '., Dggeno, A. !., & Ro*anazzi, S (200+) %tudent satisfaction and .uality of

service in

@talian universities#Emerald Group Pulishing !imited>ol# 16 ?o# 42 006

!!# 349364

Aia&2 %# % 0078 @nvestigating students !erceived satisfaction2 +ehavioral intention2 and effectiveness of

elearning Science "irect#omputers $ Education 51 00:8 :64:73 ;etrieved from

&&sciencedirect#com
http://www.sciencedirect.com/http://www.sciencedirect.com/


6/27

Br2 D# '# #2 ara# $#2 < ayna-# E 0058 eterminants of +usiness student satisfaction and retention in

higher education" a!!lying er+ergGs t&ofactor theory#International Journal of Educational

Management2 >ol# 19 @ss" 2 !!#1: 139

Bhonstan2 )#2 illion2 B#2 Domen2 B#0058 %tudent satisfaction in the virtual classroom %he internet&ournal of allied health sciences and practice# >olume 3 num+er #

ouglas2 B#2 McClelland2 ;#2 < avies2 B 0078 The develo!ment of a conce!tual model of student

satisfaction &ith their e/!erience in higher education# Emerald (rou! u+lishing Aimited >ol# 16

?o# 12 00: !!# 1935

Soenberg, ., (2011) -n#esigaing he on$e/ of Suden Saisfa$ion

htt!"HH&&duo#uio#noH Try--"

;e!rosentralen2 ,niversitetet i Dslo

Iutt2 I# J#2 < ;ehman2 # 0108 $ study e/amining the students satisfaction in higher education#

Procedia Social and Behavioral Science 0108 54465450

$ldemir2 (#2 < (ulcan2 =# 0048 %tudent %atisfaction in igher Education# Higher Education

Management and Policy >olume 162 ?o#

urois$h, S., 3ignai, ., & Kauf*ann, H. R. (200+) $ student satisfaction model for

austrian higher

education !roviders#

%&eeney2 B#C#2 < @ngram## 0018# $ Com!arison of Traditional and 'e+ Mar-eting Education" $nE/!loratory %tudy#Journal of Mar'eting Education2 3182 556

otler2 # < Clar-e2 ;#?# 19:78#Mar'eting for health care organi(ations)Engle*ood #liffs2 ?B" rentice

all


7/27

Abst"a#t

%tudent satisfaction is an im!ortant .ualitative indicator for higher educational institutes#

Measures of student satisfaction sho& the -ey factors for meeting usersG needs# This study

focuses on the etermination of level of %tudent %atisfaction of ,niversity of %argodha

(u)ran&ala Cam!us2 using factor analysis# Three factors &ere e/tracted" 18 $cademic advising

effectiveness2 8 Cam!us environment2 38 Facilities# %tudents vie& academic advising as an

im!ortant needed service# The aim of this study is to determine the level and the factors for

university students satisfaction &ith the institution they are attending# Firstly2 the conce!t of

satisfaction &ill +e defined# %econdly2 a conce!tual frame&or- to demonstrate the relationshi!

+et&een the factors &hich lie +ehind university student satisfaction &ill +e !resented# Thirdly2

the results and im!lications are also given#


8/27

I&t"odu#tio&

ue to the high com!etition in every field of life education has +ecome the most im!ortant !art

to face com!etition and !lay a vital role in national develo!ment# The education im!ortance can

also +e descri+ed that there is a correlation +et&een education and economic gro&th usain#et

al2 0098# Education is also !roviding industries and economy &ith .uality human resources# The

$merican eritage dictionary 19:8 defines satisfaction as KThe fulfillment or gratification of a

desire2 need or a!!etiteL# otler and Clar-e 19:78 define satisfaction as KThe desirous outcomeof a )o+ or tas- that !leases ones esteemL# %&eeney and @ngram 0018 define student

satisfaction as KThe !erce!tion of en)oyment and accom!lishment in the learning environmentL#

The determination of student satisfaction &ill also hel! internal management of university to

identify &hat ma-es them distinctive and &hat are the areas that are contri+uting less in student

satisfaction#

Iefore the esta+lishment of a-istan2 there &as only one college esta+lished in 1998 in the

istrict2 located at %hah!ur2 &hich catered to the educational needs of the surrounding districts

of husha+2 Mian&ali and Iha--ar# Dne year +efore @nde!endence2 (overnment College &as

shifted from %hah!ur to %argodha# @n the ne& environment2 im+i+ed &ith the ne& s!irit of

freedom2 this institution made ra!id !rogress2 develo!ing itself into a miniuniversity2 having

started !ostgraduate classes in eight disci!lines in 19:7::# (overnment College %argodha had

a vast lush green cam!us s!read over more than one hundred acres of land# @t &as li-e an oasis of

calm and green at the midst of a +ustling city# @n 002 (overnment College &as u!graded into a

,niversity#

The ,niversity of %argodha has +ecome a legendary centre of igher Education2 in a short s!an

of time2 res!ected nationally as &ell as internationally for its +rilliant !erformance in teaching

and research activities#


9/27

The ,niversity of %argodha remains a-istans one of the most attractive universities +y

recruiters es!ecially in the field of Economics2 Iusiness Management2 Chemical @ndustry2 @T

@ndustry2 harmacy2 harmaceuticals2 %ocial %ervices2 and ?(Ds#

1ite"atu"e Re+ie-

%atisfaction according to otler and Clar-e 19:78 define satisfaction as KThe desirous outcome

of a )o+ or tas- that !leases ones esteemL#

$nd %&eeney and @ngram 0018 define student satisfaction as KThe !erce!tion of en)oyment

and accom!lishment in the learning environmentL#

2This study &as conducted in @slamic $ad ,niversity on student satisfaction is the main

indicator of higher educational institutes +ecause it meets the needs of the institutions and the

main factors effecting student satisfaction are 18 $cademic advising effectiveness2 8 Cam!us

su!!ort services2 38 Cam!us life 48 ;es!onsiveness to diverse !o!ulations2 58 %afety and

%ecurity 68 Cam!us climate2 78 financial aid effectiveness#

3The study conducted in 'inona %tate ,niversity of $merica and focuses on 11 factors &hichdetermine that there is !ositive correlation &ith the satisfaction of students in the university# The

results of this study conducted on 11 factors can +e used to assess the !erformance of the

colleges2 de!artments and !lanning !rocess#

4 The study &as conducted in $llama @.+al D!en ,niversity &hich e/!lained that the

satisfaction of the students can +e measured in three dimensions first one is the interaction

+et&een the instructor and the student2 second is the !erformance of the instructor and the last is

evaluation of the course# The relia+ility and validity of these dimensions can +e chec-ed through

feed+ac- of the students#

5The study &as conducted on igher Education in %yria and has e/!lained that the satisfaction

of the students can also +e effected +y the image of the institutions# @t means that if the image of

the institution is high students &ill +e more satisfied and loyal to the institution#


10/27

6This study &as conducted in university of Iari in @taly to investigate the !erformance of

university +y analying satisfaction of students# ,niversity focused their !olicies to im!rove

teaching and nonteaching methods so that satisfaction can +e analyed#

7This study &as conducted in medical university of China# @n this study it &as tested that

students &ill +e more satisfied if they are !rovided &ith the elearning system instead of

+lac-+oard# %tudent satisfaction also is effected +y the +ehavioral intention#

8 This study &as conducted in California %tate ,niversity and the main determinants &ere

student satisfaction and their retention in colleges or university and ho& much they +ecome

satisfied from the e/!erience of instructors# The !ath &as er+ergGs t&ofactor theory# The

study indicated that students &ho are !ositive are more satisfied than &ho have negative

e/!erience#

9This study &as conducted in college of $llied ealth and ?ursing at ?ova %outheastern

,niversity# The first determinant that contri+utes to student satisfaction &as 18 the design of the

course 8 fle/i+ility 38 interaction &ith students 48 interaction &ith instructor 58 monitory

su!!ort 68 and student orientation

The study &as conducted in the university +usiness school in , and undergraduate students

&ere assessed to determine the satisfaction of the students a+out teaching2 learning and su!!ort

services# This study also indicated that satisfied students &ill leave a good im!act on the ne&

comer students dissatisfied students &ill leave negative im!act#

2;This study &as conducted in ,niversity Df Dslo in &hich it &as e/!lained that student

satisfaction can +e increased +y increasing the interest of the students to&ards social and

academic !ers!ectives#

22This study &as conducted in 010 to determine the satisfaction level of the students in higher

education institutions of a-istan# The satisfaction level &as tested through the follo&ing factors

18 instructor e/!erience 8 courses offered 38 environment and classroom facilities +ut the

e/tent of satisfaction is different +et&een male and female students

23it defined the satisfaction as ones !erce!tion a+out something and also descri+ed the -ey

factors that contri+ute to the satisfaction level of students# The -ey factors are 18 faculty


11/27

!erformance 8 communication &ith instructor and students 38 and the .uality of the education#

Iut this study revealed that !erformance of the instructor not only adds lots to the satisfaction

level of the students +ut also increase the students loyalty to the institutions#

24This study &as conducted in the $ustrian ,niversities of $!!lied %ciences &hich revealed the

im!ortance of the students satisfaction as im!ortant !art of the universities in terms of mar-eting

model# This study e/!lained that student satisfaction generate a !ositive im!act on the student

motivation and -ee!s them retain# @t also revealed that instead of .uality teaching2 .uality

infrastructure and administration staff has effect on the student satisfaction#


12/27

Data A&a(%sis

1 @ easily understand the lecture#

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

S&rong4

Agree

0.0510.0520.05"0.0560.0570.05+0.05

;es!onse to my .uestions in class is satisfactory#

S&rong4

Disa

greeNe

u&ra

S&rong4

Agree

0.05

10.05

20.05

"0.05

60.05

70.05

3The learning !rocess is su!!orted +y additionalinformation#e/am!les from daily life8


13/27

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

S&rong4

Agree

0.05

7.0510.0517.0520.0527.05"0.05"7.0560.05

4@ freely !artici!ate in learning !rocess#discussion

or H$8

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

S&rong4

Agree

0.057.0510.0517.0520.0527.05"0.05"7.0560.05

5@ com!letely understand the conce!ts of all the

su+)ects#

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

S&rong4

Agree

0.057.05

10.0517.0520.0527.05"0.05"7.0560.05


14/27

6Teachers are easily availa+le after the class for

further discussion#

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

S&rong4

Agree

0.057.05

10.0517.0520.0527.05

"0.05"7.05

7Classes are &ell managed according to the timeta+le#start or finished8

S&rong4

Disagree

Neu&ra

S&rong4A

gree

0.057.0510.0517.0520.0527.05"0.05"7.0560.05

: Course outline of every su+)ect is !rovided#


15/27

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

S&rong4

Agree

0.05

7.0510.0517.0520.0527.05"0.05"7.05

9 @m treated fairly in the class#

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

S&rong4

Agree

0.057.0510.0517.0520.0527.05"0.05"7.0560.05

67.05

10 (rades are fairly allocated +y the teachers#

S&rong4

Disagree

Disagree

Neu&ra

Agree

S&rong4A

gree

0.057.0510.0517.0520.0527.05"0.05"7.0560.05

11The assessments are conducted as !er schedule#

.ui2 test or !resentations8


16/27

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

Agree

S&rong4

Agree

0.057.0510.0517.05

20.0527.05"0.05"7.0560.0567.05

1 Class room environment is comforta+le#

S

&rong4

Disa

gree

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

Agree

S&rong4

Agree

0.057.0510.0517.05

20.0527.05

"0.05"7.05

13 @m satisfied &ith the university environment#

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

Agree

S&rong4

Agree

0.057.05

10.0517.0520.0527.05"0.05"7.05


17/27

14%tudents are satisfied &ith the goods !rovided in

cafe#

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

Agree

S&rong4

Agree

0.057.05

10.0517.0520.0527.05"0.05"7.05

60.05

15 The !rice of all goods is according to the mar-et&ith minimum difference#

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Neu

&ra

S&rong4Ag

ree

0.057.05

10.0517.0520.0527.05"0.05"7.0560.0567.05

16Ioo-s are easily availa+le in the li+rary according

to the students re.uirements#


18/27

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

S&rong4

Agree

0.057.0510.05

17.0520.0527.05"0.05"7.0560.0567.05

17Aa+ facility is !rovided +y the university in &hich&ide range of com!uters are availa+le#

S&rong

4Disa

gree

Neu&ra

S&ron

g4Ag

ree

0.05

10.05

20.05

"0.05

60.05

70.05

1: @m satisfied &ith the university trans!ort facility#

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

S&rong4

Agree

0.05

7.05

10.05

17.05

20.05

27.05

"0.05


19/27


20/27

S&rong4

Disa

gree

Neu&ra

S&rong4

Agree

0.05

7.0510.0517.0520.0527.05"0.05

I&te"/"etatio&

@n inter!retation &e are going to inter!ret our analysis of data a+out the satisfaction of

students in the university according to the res!onses gathered through .uestionnaire# The

res!onse against every single .uestion is inter!reted +elo The !ercentage is calculated

from the sam!le of 00 students#

18 56#5N of our res!ondents agreed that they understand the lectures easily +ut #5

!ercent res!ondents disagreed#

8 46#5N agreed that the res!onse to their .uestion in the class is satisfactory and

3#5N strongly disagreed a+out this .uery#

38 40N agreed that additional information for learning !rocess is !rovided +ut #5N

have strongly disagreed to this#48 37#5N students have res!onded that they can freely !artici!ate in the learning

!rocess in the class +ut only #5N students have strongly disagreed that they

cannot

58 3:N res!ondents have claimed that they are agreed a+out the understanda+ility of

conce!ts of all lectures and N do not understand the conce!ts#

68 3#5N agreed that teachers are availa+le after class discussion and 6N strongly

disagreed a+out it#

78 40N students are agreed that classes starts and finished according to time ta+le

4#5N strongly disagreed a+out the management of classes#

:8 0N students are agreed a+out the !rovision of course outline2 3N students

neither agreed nor disagreed and 13#5N students are strongly disagreed#


21/27

98 41#5N res!ondents are agreed that they are treated &ell in the class and the

res!onse of 7N students is strongly disagreed#10839#5N students have given res!onse that grades are fairly allocated +ut only 6N

said that they are strongly disagreed fair allocation of grades +y the teachers#

11843N res!ondents res!onded that tests are conducted according to the schedule and

4#5N students have given res!onse of strongly disagreed#

1831N students agreed a+out the environment of classroom +ut only 13#5N students

are disagreed a+out the class room environment#

13833#5N are strongly disagreed that they are not satisfied &ith the university

environment and only :N students strongly agreed &ith the university

environment#14840N students are strongly disagreed a+out the cafO !roducts and :N are strongly

agreed to this#

1584#5N res!ondents are strongly disagreed that !rice of cafe items are not

according &ith mar-et !rices and 4N students are strongly agreed &ith the !rices#

16841#5N students claimed that +oo-s in the li+rary are not according to student

re.uirements +ut 7#5N are strongly agreed#

178 4:N students strongly disagreed a+out the &ide range of com!uters availa+le in

the la+ and only 3#5N students are strongly agreed#1:830N res!ondents are strongly disagreed a+out the satisfaction of trans!ort facility

of university +ut only 7#5N students are satisfied &ith it#19860#5N students are strongly disagreed a+out the availa+ility of !layground and

only 3N students are strongly agreed &ith it#

081N students are strongly disagreed a+out the s!orts and other e/tracurricular

activities2 6#5N students neither agreed nor disagreed and only 10N students are

strongly agreed#

18 :N res!ondents are strongly disagreed a+out the reasona+le !ar-ing and 10#5N

students are strongly agreed a+out the !ar-ing#


22/27

o(usio&

This research is conducted on the +asis of selfadministrated .uestionnaire

consists of 1 .uestions# These .uestions &ere set to test the satisfaction level of students of

university of %argodha (u)ran&ala cam!us# These are !re!ared &ith the interval scale and

divided into three categories one is the academic satisfaction2 second is the satisfaction &ith the

environment of the class and the university and the last is the satisfaction &ith res!ect to

facilities !rovided +y university# This .uestionnaire &as filled out from a sam!le of 00 students

of university of %argodha (u)ran&ala cam!us#

From our analysis it is concluded that these varia+les e/!lained a+ove contri+ute a lot in the

satisfaction of students# First and foremost factor is the academic factor &hich sho&s higher

level of satisfaction of students +ecause highly !erforming2 &ell trained and e/!erienced teachers

-ee! students more satisfied not only &ith their courses +ut also &ith the students and the

institutions# They can also retain and increase the num+er of students in the university#

Dther academic factors such as teachers interaction &ith students in and outside of the

classroom2 .uality education and selection of te/t+oo-s also increase the satisfaction of students#

Aearning and classroom environment is the second most im!ortant factor# @n the university of

%argodha (u)ran&ala cam!us mostly students are not satisfied &ith the university environment#

The last factor of this study is the facilities !rovided +y the university &hich includes trans!ort2

cafe2 !ar-ing2 !layground2 s!orts gala2 com!uter la+ and li+rary# The res!onse a+out these

facilities &as totally negative and the students sho&ed dissatisfaction a+out the facilities#

This study sho&s that there is a !ositive relationshi! +et&een student satisfaction and the factors

academic2 environment and facilities8# This study also sho&s that 43N students are satisfied2

3N are neutral and 34N are dissatisfied &ith the university# The findings of this study are onlyim!lemented on ,niversity Df %argodha (u)ran&ala Cam!us#


23/27

Re)e"ees

hosravi2 $# $#2 Poushaneh, K., Roozegar, A., & Sohrabifard, N (2012) determination of

factors

affecting students satisfaction#Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science 0138579 5:3

Tessema2M#$#2 ;eady2 M#2 < =u2 '# ' 018 Factors affecting college students satisfaction &ith

ma)or curriculum#International Journal of Humanities and Social Science>ol# ?o#

$li2 $#2 < $hmad2 @ 0118 ey Factors for etermining %tudents %atisfaction in istance Aearning

Courses contem!orary educational technology2 0112 82 11:134

D, H., & Anazer, ! (201") The im!act of service .uality on student satisfaction and beha#iora

$onse%uen$es in higher edu$aion ser#i$es. International Journal of Economy,

Management and Social Sciences, 68 Bune 0132 ages" :590

etruellis, '., Dggeno, A. !., & Ro*anazzi, S (200+) %tudent satisfaction and .uality of

service in

@talian universities#Emerald Group Pulishing !imited>ol# 16 ?o# 42 006

!!# 349364

Aia&2 %# % 0078 @nvestigating students !erceived satisfaction2 +ehavioral intention2 and effectiveness of

elearning Science "irect#omputers $ Education 51 00:8 :64:73 ;etrieved from

&&sciencedirect#com

Br2 D# '# #2 ara# $#2 < ayna-# E 0058 eterminants of +usiness student satisfaction and retention in

higher education" a!!lying er+ergGs t&ofactor theory#International Journal of Educational

Management2 >ol# 19 @ss" 2 !!#1: 139

Bhonstan2 )#2 illion2 B#2 Domen2 B#0058 %tudent satisfaction in the virtual classroom %he internet

&ournal of allied health sciences and practice# >olume 3 num+er #

ouglas2 B#2 McClelland2 ;#2 < avies2 B 0078 The develo!ment of a conce!tual model of student

satisfaction &ith their e/!erience in higher education# Emerald (rou! u+lishing Aimited >ol# 16

?o# 12 00: !!# 1935

Soenberg, ., (2011) -n#esigaing he on$e/ of Suden Saisfa$ionhtt!"HH&&duo#uio#noH Try--"

;e!rosentralen2 ,niversitetet i Dslo

Iutt2 I# J#2 < ;ehman2 # 0108 $ study e/amining the students satisfaction in higher education#

Procedia Social and Behavioral Science 0108 54465450

$ldemir2 (#2 < (ulcan2 =# 0048 %tudent %atisfaction in igher Education# Higher Education
http://www.sciencedirect.com/http://www.sciencedirect.com/


24/27

Management and Policy >olume 162 ?o#

urois$h, S., 3ignai, ., & Kauf*ann, H. R. (200+) $ student satisfaction model for

austrian higher

education !roviders#

%&eeney2 B#C#2 < @ngram## 0018# $ Com!arison of Traditional and 'e+ Mar-eting Education" $n

E/!loratory %tudy#Journal of Mar'eting Education2 3182 556

otler2 # < Clar-e2 ;#?# 19:78#Mar'eting for health care organi(ations)Engle*ood #liffs2 ?B" rentice

all


25/27

UNIVERSITY OF SARGODHA

GU


26/27

discussion or H$86 @ com!letely understand the conce!ts of all the

su+)ects#7 Teachers are easily availa+le after the class for

further discussion#

8 Classes are &ell managed according to the timeta+le#start or finished8

9 Course outline of every su+)ect is !rovided#

@m treated fairly in the class#

2; (rades are fairly allocated +y the teachers#

22 The assessments are conducted as !er schedule#

.ui2 test or !resentations823 Class room environment is comforta+le#

24 @m satisfied &ith the university environment#25 %tudents are satisfied &ith the goods !rovided in

cafe#26 The !rice of all goods is according to the mar-et

&ith minimum difference#27 Ioo-s are easily availa+le from the li+rary

according to the students demand#28 Aa+ facility is !rovided +y the university in

&hich &ide range of com!uters are availa+le#29 @m satisfied &ith the university trans!ort

facility#2 layground facility is availa+le to the students#

3; %tudents are satisfied &ith the s!orts gala2

seminars or other e/tra cocurricular events#

32 ;easona+le !ar-ing facility is !rovided#

Tota(

$ny Comment


27/27

>Tha&* %ou +e"% mu#h?

Documents

Research on USGC