Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 1/38
Task E, part 2Task E, part 2
• Research on CMS• Farrell, Hauser, Jarvis, Smith, Perloff, Rakness
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 2/38
Hauser research teamHauser research team
• Postdocs Greg Rakness, Chad Jarvis
• Both resident at CERN• Supported by Task E
• Engineer John Smith• Here at UCLA• Supported by US-CMS M&O and
Upgrade funds
• Students Chris Farrell (grad), AlexxPerloff (undergrad)
• Currently resident in L.A.• Supported by Task E and M&O,
respectively
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 3/38
Research program: past & presentResearch program: past & present• CDF: 1990-2007 (created the UCLA group)
• Co-founder of CDF Exotics physics group• Plug calorimeter upgrade, esp. shower maximum• Supersymmetry searches (all-jets, multi-leptons), top mass with matrix
element method • Some publications below…
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 4/38
Research program: past & presentResearch program: past & present
• CMS since 1994, now sole research activity• Emphasis on the endcap muon system – cathode strip
chambers (CSC)• Created the CSC trigger electronics (1700 boards built
at UCLA)• Track Finder part split off Acosta at UF
• Responsible for CSC time synchronization• Responsible for CSC upgrades• ~2/3 of time in Geneva since Jan. 2008
UCLA work centers on the endcap muon
detectors
• 4x2 muon stations like that on right
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 6/38
US-CMS muon detector contributionUS-CMS muon detector contribution
• Cathode strip chambers (CSC) cover 1.0<η<2.4• Magnificent system of 468 chambers, 2.5M wires
(none broken), fast & reliable electronics
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 7/38
Research program: futureResearch program: future• Commission CSC with “first” data in 2009 and 2010:
• Tending the CSC trigger electronics: update firmware, fix boards• Rakness: the manager for CSC detector operations• Timing: big change from cosmic rays to collision muons• Trigger configuration: start with loose muon criteria, then tighten
• Physics interests using 2010 data:• Inclusive single muon spectrum at highest Pt• Slow penetrating particles in the endcap muon detector
• Management: • CMS muon upgrade co-leader, US-CMS “upgrade L3 manager”• Will be International CMS Project Manager for CSCs starting Jan.
1, 2010
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 8/38
Details that following and the corresponding Task E proposal sections
Details that following and the corresponding Task E proposal sections
• (Section 3) CSC electronics work
• (Section 4) CSC commissioning and operations
• (Section 5&7) physics analysis preparation
• (Section 8) upgrades
• (New) CSC management
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 9/38
CSC trigger schemeCSC trigger scheme
θ
ϕ
• Muon trigger measures momentum by curvature between stations• Low momentum muons are excluded (~10 MHz background)
• Two stations is absolute minimum• Three stations for minimal redundancy against
mismeasurement, multiple scattering, bremmstrahlung
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 10/38
(Section 3) CSC trigger electronics(Section 3) CSC trigger electronics
• 1700 programmable boards built and maintained by UCLA
• 3 types of UCLA boards• 468 boards each type plus
15-20% spares
• (14000 cathode trigger ASICs built by UCLA+CERN)
• (other boards built by Ohio State, CMU, Rice)
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 11/38
On-chamber trigger boardsOn-chamber trigger boards• ALCT board project: 468 boards, 3 variants
• 288-, 384-, and 672-channels each• Boards are re-programmable• 10-15% spares
• Boards needing repair are shipped back to UCLA
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 12/38
In 9U VME “peripheral crates”In 9U VME “peripheral crates”• Trigger Motherboards (TMB) and transition (RAT) boards
• 9 boards of each type in each of 60 crates• Fully programmable
lTTMB= Trigger Mother Board
RAT= Rpc + AlctTransition board
Cathode data inputs RPC data
inputs
ALCT data inputs
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 13/38
Recent electronics workRecent electronics work
• ALCT board test station restoration• Had been idle for ~4 years• Two stations now up and running• Special tester boards, firmware, and software
• About 30 ALCT boards debugged and fixed• Some boards never made to work previously• Some boards were returned from CERN• Good electronics training for the students
• 19 TMB boards returned from CERN for repair• Will be done by next month
Farrell and Perloff
Smith
Laboratory diagnosis and repair tools – $17K “stimulus” item
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 14/38
Electronics firmwareElectronics firmware
• Continuous process of improvements• Most recently (2009):
• Error-correcting code for ALCT TMB trigger and data paths in continuous operation
• New testing mode exhaustively tests all TMB—ALCT “Skewclear” cable pairs
• Numerous faulty cables were found and fixed or replaced
• ALCT clock phase adjustment to match muon time-of-flight
• “Muonic” timing for better control of CSC synchronization
Smith
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 15/38
(Section 4) CSC commissioning and operations
(Section 4) CSC commissioning and operations
• Led by Rakness for ~2 years thus far• ~100 people involved• 24/7 operation first started in August 2008• Big system (468 chambers, ~500,000 electronics
channels on ~12,000 boards, cables, gas, HV, LV, etc.)• Exhausting job – must be semi-expert on every topic
• Successes:• Large majority of the system works smoothly• Our detector furnished the baseline trigger for first
LHC beam
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 16/38
Rakness’ job:Rakness’ job:• Called as last resort when nobody else can solve a problem• Supervises:
• 24/7 shift operations manager• Team of CEOs “Csc Expert Operator” that rotate weekly• Deals with individual shift personnel (21-42 shifts/week)• This organization cuts down on wear & tear on Greg
• Runs the Tuesday CSC operations meetings• Represents CSCs at the Friday run coordination meetings• Daily planning meeting to discuss, e.g.:
• On-detector work• Updates to software versions• Safety system tests• Tests of new firmware• Computer network outages• Computer upgrades• Gas system interruptions• Cooling water leaks• Movements of the endcap iron disks• Power outages• Online databases• Coordination with RPC detector work• Fixes to the low-voltage and high-voltages systems
Sept. 2008 dataCSC triggers on beam halo muon
One endcap zoomed
cathode hits6 layers
anode hits6 layers
Sept. 2008 dataCSC triggers on beam halo muon
Both endcaps shown
LHC single beam dumped into upstream collimatorCreates “monster” event in which nearly all channels are lit up
The pink lines are CSC segments. There are O(170k) hits in each of these events.
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 20/38
A Brief History of TimeSynchronization of the CSC Detector
A Brief History of TimeSynchronization of the CSC Detector
• 13.73 billion years passed, then…• Beam tests 1999-2002:
• Timing-in took 1-2 weeks per chamber• Slice Tests in 2007:
• Techniques developed for rapidly measuring most timing parameters
• During 2008: • First timing-in 468-chamber CSC system• UF procedure to precisely align (cosmic)
muon stubs at the SP• During 2009:
• Development of “muonic” timing• Front-end clocking phase = muon TOF
• Accuracy:• Last year ±25 ns ±5 ns just recently• Desired: ±2 ns allows reliable
determination of the right bx with beam
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 21/38
Time alignmentTime alignment
• Some 20,000 timing parameters to be set• Anode hit fine delays with 2ns/tick• Cathode-anode time matching • Readout timing for cathode, anode, trigger
• First: align the trigger• Individual chambers:
• Pulse test strip• Natural radioactivity and 1-layer trigger
• Between chambers: TOF relevant, use cosmic rays
• Then align the readout timing
TMB #1ALCTTOFdelay
TMB #2ALCTTOFdelay
Master clock
collisionAt BC0
ALCT1
ALCT2
TMB #1
sync
TMB #2
syncMuonfrom BC0
TMB BC0 out
TMB BC0 returnAligned!
BC0 timing diagram:
TX2 bc0 delay
TX1 bc0 delaytx1 TOF delay
tx2 TOF delay
S2 Skewclear delayS1 Skewclear delay
TMB clocks
ALCT clocks
S2 Skewclear delay
S1 Skewclear delay
rx1 TMB-in phase
rx2 TMB-in phase
RX1 input data delay
RX2 input data delay
CSC #1 CSC #2
Physical connections:
time
(bx)
Muonic timing: 2 CSCs, TMB ALCT
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 23/38
(Sections 5&7) Physics Analysis Prep.(Sections 5&7) Physics Analysis Prep.
• Main effort thus far is on single extreme-PT muons• Obvious signal for W′ particles: possibly competitive with
Tevatron in first data run • A prime model-independent signal of new physics
• Challenges:• Susceptible to rare tracking errors where curved muon track
appears nearly straight• High flux of isolated, moderate-PT muons from ordinary W and Z
decay and top quarks• Problem is highly dependent on alignment precision
• Hard to define fully data-driven method• Z μμ sample mismeasurement “easily” identified• Fewer events than W μν so can only place upper limit on the
mismeasurement probability
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 24/38
Some investigationsSome investigations• Track detail display:
• Effect of optimized track selection cuts:
Jarvis
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 25/38
…more investigations…more investigations• Badly mis-reconstructed tracks
• Pt(true)<100 GeV/c, Pt(reco.)>300 GeV/c• “hot spots” in η−φ found, being investigated
• Also:• Verified small tails for Tracker and Tracker-plus-1st muon station• Sensitivity to W′ in first data run• Sensitivity of results to alignment
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 26/38
Early physics:slow penetrating charged particles
Early physics:slow penetrating charged particles
• Signal:• Penetrating so look like muons, but
v<c so timing is slower
• We (UCLA) are expert on CSC timing:
• Cathode timing (Deisher)• Fit to pulse shape• Time calibration is important
• Anode timing (Rakness)• Bx digitization RMS=10 ns per
plane, but ~20 planes per track• RMS 5 ns using digitization of both
edges of 35ns discriminator?
17 Jun 09
• Suppose gravitinos G̃ are the LSP
• WIMPs freeze out as usual
• But then all WIMPs decay to gravitinos afterMPl
2/MW3 ~ seconds to months
SUPERWIMP RELICS
Like WIMPs: a particle (gravitino) naturally gets the right relic densityUnlike WIMPs: If WIMP is charged, signal is CHAMP, not MET
G̃WIMP≈
17 Jun 09 Feng 27
Well motivated – e.g. this talk (J. Feng at LPC)
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 28/38
Endcap Muon SLHC Upgrade (needs updating)
Endcap Muon SLHC Upgrade (needs updating)
• LHC maximum luminosity increased 2-5x• CERN “phase 1” new focusing quads and new linac• Ready by 2013
• Three main tasks for muon upgrade:1. Build ME4/2 chambers (72)2. Upgrade electronics for high-rate ME1/1 chambers3. Upgrade ME1/1 off-chamber cards for high rate
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 29/38
ME4/2 and ME1/1 muon stationsME4/2 and ME1/1 muon stationsME4/2 and ME1/1 muon stations
Iron ready for ME4/2 chambers
R-Z cross-section:• ME4/2 to be built• ME1/1 electronics upgrade
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 30/38
Three tasks to upgrade muons:Three tasks to upgrade muons:1) Build ME4/2 chambers (72)
• for high-luminosity triggering over η range of 1.1-1.8
• improve μ reconstruction
7.5”2) Replace ME1/1 cathode cards
with Flash ADC version• restores trigger to η 2.1-2.4• handles highest rates
3) Update off-chamber electronics for ME1/1• accomodate new cathode cards• improve trigger and data handling
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 31/38
Triggering with the ME4/2 upgradeTriggering with the ME4/2 upgradeTriggering with the ME4/2 upgrade• Plot below shows trigger rate at L=2*1034 with ME4/2 (3/4 stations) vs.
without ME4/2 (2/3)• Triggering on n out of n stations is inefficient and uncertain
• The Level 1 trigger threshold is reduced from 48 18 GeV/c (!)• With the ME4/2 upgrade, we can still capture W, Z, top, etc. events
Target Rate 5 kHz
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 32/38
Progress on CSC upgradeProgress on CSC upgrade• Chamber production tooling revived at Fermilab• ME4/2 infrastructure mostly prepared (UW)• One prototype built by Fermilab
• Installed with 4 spare chambers to investigate performance, background rates and trigger conditions
• Tooling to be shipped to CERN in few months• Discussions regarding ~1000 m2 space at CERN
• Digital CFEB prototype being built (Ohio State)• High-luminosity simulations helpful (Texas A&M)• CD0 document written and sent in to DOE Sept. 09
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 33/38
(New) JH as CSC Project Manager(New) JH as CSC Project Manager
• Nominal term is 2 years• Nominated by Spokesperson, confirmed by CMS
Management and Collaboration Boards• Previous managers were Mitselmakher, Loveless
• Top priorities:1. Maintain good communication within the group2. Optimize CSC collision data
• Requires a transition from “commissioning” to “operations”
• Requires more emphasis on data analysis and rapid feedback to detector operations
3. Concentrate on specific areas to strengthen
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 34/38
CSC PM: communicationsCSC PM: communications• Member of CMS Management Board
• “Global” CMS issues CSC group• CSC group issues attention of all of CMS (rarely)
• Relations with US-CMS L3 manager Padley• Co-management relationship needs full info. sharing• Example: recent update of Level 3 managers group
• See next slide - addition of Bob Clare (UC Riverside), MishaIgnatenko (UCLA)
• Relations with CSC collaborators• Dubna, PNPI St. Petersburg, and IHEP Beijing
• Data analysis:• Oversight of CSC Detector Performance Group (DPG)• Closely related to Muon Physics Object Group (POG)
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 35/38
CSC organizationCSC organization
• PM: Hauser (intl) and Padley (U.S.)• Deputy U.S. PM: Loveless• New “Level 3” structure:
• Rakness (UCLA) Operations Manager• Lanaro (UW) CSC Field Coord., Mechanical systems• Borcherding (FNAL) Electrical systems• Durkin (OSU) Electronics systems• Geurts (Rice), Clare (UCR) Online systems• Prokofiev (FNAL) Chambers• Ignatenko (UCLA) Chamber and electronics maintenance• Cox (Davis) CSC/DPG coordinator• Valuev (UCLA) CSC/POG contact• Hauser (UCLA) Upgrades• Korytov (UF) Special technical advisor
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 36/38
CSC PM: optimize collision dataCSC PM: optimize collision data• Endcap muon detectors have often been ignored in past
experiments…• E.g. in 2008 and 2009 much more barrel muon results from cosmic rays • CMS endcap covers a large range ☺ (η from 1.0 to 2.4)
• Up-time and data quality:• Problems thus far have been rare
• Robust CSC detector technology, well-built system • Trigger efficiency optimization:
• Concern about barrel-CSC overlap region – commissioned late, only modest software tools
• Concern about timing (must not trigger at wrong bunch crossing)• Data analysis optimization:
• DPG: Software tools are incomplete• Offline determination of fine timing is still under development• Muon POG: Muon ID cuts and relationship to alignment• Effects of neutrons and other sources of background hits• Groups are quite small
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 37/38
CSC PM: specific areas to strengthenCSC PM: specific areas to strengthen
• Part of overall shift from commissioning to a running detector
• Online shift crew interfaces• Several talented online programmers in CSC• Main issue is for guidance: what do we want?
• Simple event display• Need for something fast and portable, not 3D
• Hardware alignment• Several management structures in past• Expect to handle as “distributed” system in CSC like the trigger:
has mechanical, electronics, software aspects
• Documentation continues…• encourage detector-related publications, and locate deficiencies
in Twiki pages, etc.
DOE site review – Jay Hauser 30 Oct. 2009 38/38
SummarySummary• Muon detector commissioning increasingly
sophisticated (Rakness)• Muon trigger electronics working well
• Repairs and improvements of firmware (engineers)
• Muon system timing increasingly accurate• JH, Jarvis
• Muon SLHC upgrade effort is underway
• Expect to have some time to do early physics, e.g.:• Single muon Pt spectrum (Jarvis, Farrell)• Slow penetrating particles (Rakness, JH)