Research Management and the Use of Social Media Dan Nordquist, Director Office of Grant and Research Development Washington State University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Research Management and the Use of Social Media Dan Nordquist, Director Office of Grant and Research Development Washington State University
  • Slide 2
  • A Retrospect I 1971: the first Email was sent 1994: GeoCities was born 1997: SixDegrees was launched AOL Instant Messenger was launched 2000: The.com bubble bursts 2002: Friendster is launched, gathering 3M+ users in the first 3 months 2003: MySpace is launched (by 2006 it had grown to be the most popular social network in the world) Linked-IN is launched (one of the first mainstream social media networks dedicated to business) Facebox and Bingbox (yet known as Netlog) are launched
  • Slide 3
  • A Retrospect II 2004: Facebook is launched (originally as a way of connecting college students) 2005: Youtube was the first major video hosting and sharing site 2006: Twitter is born (a micro-blogging website, 140 caracters of less) 2008: Facebook overtakes MySpace as the leading social-networking site (with currently over 600million users) 2010: Google launches Google Buzz 2011: Spling is born. (within the first 4 days, the site generated 1M+ hits, boasting 5,000 unique visitors and 125,000 page views) October 2011: Launch of Google+ (integrating Google Buzz) 2012: Facebook files for an IPO. At its premiere in the stock trading floors, the network aims to collect 10 billion dollars. Its value is estimated between 75 and 100 billion dollars. Twitter generates 12,233 tweets per second during the Super Bowl
  • Slide 4
  • Market Share of Visits [August 2012] for the top 5: Facebook 62.62% (+) Youtube 20.16% (-) Twitter 2.03% (-) Pinterest 1.08% (+) Google+ 1.03% (+) Source: http://www.dreamgrow.com/http://www.dreamgrow.com/
  • Slide 5
  • Potential Audience Research Admins Faculty Graduate Students Potential Benefits Mentoring Collaboration Diversity Dissemination of Information Community building Sharing Ideas Q&A
  • Slide 6
  • Social Media and Research Administration What we have explored Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Groups Google+ Time invested Adding a personal touch A Minute with Derek E-Rex Tip - 149 hits Santa - 116 hits E-Rex Tip - 100 hits Cost Sharing - 40 hits Grant Opportunities 259 hits
  • Slide 7
  • Facebook Insights Who You Reached How You Reached People Visits to Your Page
  • Slide 8
  • Student Communication Class Led Survey & Focus Group Is Facebook effective as social media tool for Research Administration & Faculty in their pursuit of sponsored programs? Faculty 55% Female 45% Male Age 37% 55+ 30% 45-54 33% 44- Appointment 32% Tenured 15% Tenure Track 15% Non-T/T Teaching 9% Non-T/T Research 29% Other Res. Admins
  • Slide 9
  • Results 33% of faculty and 44% of research admins saw privacy as a very important factor in their decision to participate in social networks. 21% of research administrators say Facebook is prohibited in their workplace. 49% of faculty and 24% of research admins saw little to no potential for social networking, facilitated by our office, to benefit their work efforts. 20% of faculty said they never use the social media sites they subscribe to.
  • Slide 10
  • Potential Pitfalls Privacy concerns/vulnerability Personal & institutional Intellectual property Reputation Information overload A good website is better Doesnt want more sites to check Resistance to engage new media Faculty prefer face-to-face personal touch someone they can trust. Duplication of work what is the added value?
  • Slide 11
  • The right tool for the right task & audience Social Networks directional, information gathering Twitter directional & short concepts YouTube Training but keep it short, informative & fun Social Bookmarking create subject tailored bookmarks for sharing (e.g. Grant Writing Skills, NIH useful sites) Face to face nothing can replace the value of relationship
  • Slide 12
  • Engage Your Audience Be interesting funny, controversial, thought provoking Be personal congratulate, invite, ask Be relevant listen, ask, research Be consistent monitor, post regularly Be responsive monitor, respond and provide help
  • Slide 13
  • Being Effective Write (Post) For Your Reader In translation this is simply known as target language. In localization it is known as target audience. The same rules apply. If you are talking to your audience of 18-24 year old females, writing for them is very different than writing for faculty. This case applies for all segments, audiences, and markets. Write for the Medium Just like in all media, we need to write for the medium. Nike will have different advertisement in their business newspaper advertising when compared with the advertising they will place in a male orientated lifestyle and entertainment magazine. The same goes with social media marketing. Facebook is a medium, LinkedIn is another medium, and each site and network will have its own suitability. The 1-2-3s (E-E-E) to Increase Traffic in Social Media Educate - Ideally your audience should come away with a lesson they feel is so valuable and useful they cannot help but share their newly obtained knowledge with other students and or faculty alike. (In our office this is Grant Opportunities, eREX tips, Self-care Fridays) Engage Try to leave your topic open for discussion by asking a specific question as a call to action to generate comments from your followers. Some of my best content comes from questions asked by readers, because it gives you a better perspective on what my audience wants to know and allows one to respond directly to their needs. Entertain Entertaining your audience is as easy as being yourself, and remembering to keep your stories real, and personal. (TED videos, Trends in Education, Economic Outlooks, Wellbeing)
  • Slide 14
  • Recent & Next Steps: Exploring ResearchGate http://www.researchgate.net/ Live feed (share notes) Follow Topics Select Discipline(s) Share: Pubs; links; images; files Search for: Researchers; topics; questions; pubs; journals; jobs Start a Project (visible to all within that institution: E.g., WSU 332 members by 10.10.12) Start a bench to share files and comments with project members RG score (measures scientific reputation)
  • Slide 15
  • Recent & Next Steps Potential to Beta Test a closed LinkedIn group for a specific project (e.g., grant competition) Effectiveness of Twitter to disseminate funding opportunities compared to FB Challenges Increasing expectation of faster response by users Resources (staff) needed Browsing How can users effectively find valuable information that is not easily accessible/searchable? (e.g., In a FB timeline)
  • Slide 16
  • Opportunities & Future of Social Media 1 in every 13 people on Earth is on Facebook 35+ demographic represents more than 30% of the entire user base 71.2 % of all USA internet users are on Facebook 48% of young Americans said they found out about news through Facebook Average user is connected to 80 community pages, groups and events More than 2.5 million websites have integrated with Facebook, including over 80 of comScores U.S. Top 100 websites and over half of comScores Global Top 100 websites People that use Facebook on their mobile devices are twice as active on Facebook than non-mobile users.
  • Slide 17
  • Discussion It takes time. Is it worth it? Where do we go from here? Personal & private interaction National interaction What has your institution implemented? Will social media change university research and research administration? What are the implications of these changes for research administration? Is there a need for an institution-wide social media policy? CAP NETWORK