Upload
chill
View
29
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Agenda-G-2. Financial Statement Presentation. Research Fellow Daehwa Jung. Contents. Background. Working Group. Discussion Issues. Summary. Contents. Background. Working Group. Discussion Topics. Summary. Background. IASB. FASB. Joint Project. Establish Global Standard. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Research FellowDaehwa Jung
Financial Statement Presentation
Agenda-G-2
Contents
2
BackgroundWorking GroupDiscussion IssuesSummary
Contents
3
Working Group
Summary
Background
Discussion Topics
Background
4
Establish Global StandardProject Objective
Improve Usefulness of FSThe Boards’ Goal
Joint ProjectIASB FASB
Background continued
Steps for the Financial Statement Presentation(FSP) Project
• Discussion Paper(DP) published: Oct. ‘08
• Comment period given: until Apr. ‘09
• 1st AOSSG meeting: Nov. ‘09
• Staff Draft posted: Jul. ‘10
• 2nd AOSSG meeting: Sep. ‘10
• Exposure Draft(ED) expected to be issued: Q1 of ‘11
• Final standards expected to be issued: Q4 of ‘11
5
The IASB Staff Draft of ED on FSP
The IASB Staff Draft on FSP
• Reflects the cumulative, tenative decisions made by the boards.
• Includes almost all important issues related to FSP
Core principles of FSP are
• Portraying a cohesive financial picture, and
• Disaggregating information (useful in assessing future cash flows)
6
Contents
7
SummaryDiscussion TopicsWorking GroupBackground
Working Group
8
Purpose • To assist the AOSSG in preparing improvement proposals to the IASB regarding the staff draft on FSP
Lead country • Korea
Co-lead country • China
Members• Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Macao, Malaysia, New Zealand
Chronology of Working Process in 2010
• Jul. 1: staff draft posted
• Aug. 7: distribution of a questionnaire for FSP WG
• Sept. 9: circulation of lead country’s comments on the ques-tionnaire for FSP WG → Australia, China, Hong Kong, Japan, Macao, and New Zealand commented
• Comment period given: until Sep. 15
• Sep. 29: 2nd AOSSG meeting
9
Contents
10
Working Group
Summary
Discussion Topics
Summary
Topics to be discussed
11
Topic 1 Operating & Investing Categories
Topic 2 Operating Finance Subcategory
Topic 3 Direct & Indirect Cash Flow(CF) Statement
Topic 4 Reconciliation of Income to CF
Topic 5 Multi-category Transaction
Topic 6 Cash & Cash Equivalents
What is the main issue?
• To appropriately classify operating and investing activities.
1. Operating & Investing Categories
12
Business Activities
Operating Investing
The IASB Staff Draft’s Proposal
• An operating category is comprised of assets(liabilities) re-lated to an entity’s day-to-day business.
• An investing category is comprised of assets(liabilities) which generate return with no significant synergy from combined assets.
Changes from the DP to the Staff Draft
• The notion of “Core and non-core activities” was the key principle to classify the business section in the DP, however it is eliminated.
• The boards proposed the independent definition for each category.
1. Operating & Investing Categories continued
13
WG’s Comments
• The definitions of the categories are rule-based.
• The underlying use may not be reflected in classifications.
• Most financing activities exist inseparably with operating ac-tivities.
Lead Country’s Suggestion
• To be principle-based, the notion of “Core and non-core” should be reflected in their definitions.
• It is recommended that the concept of the business section be eliminated, resulting in three sections: Operating section, Investing section, Finance section.
14
1. Operating & Investing Categories continued
15
2. Operating Finance Subcategory
What is the main issue?
• To classify some activities with both operating and financing characteristics in their proper place.
FinancingOperating
The IASB Staff Draft’s Proposal
• Any activity directly related to an operating activity is classi-fied as an operating finance subcategory.
Changes from the DP to the Staff Draft
• The operating finance subcategory was not stated in the DP.
• However, many argued some parts of the operating category were attributable to the finance section.
• The boards added the subcategory to the staff draft.
16
2. Operating Finance Subcategory continued
WG’s Comments
• It is difficult to conclude that the benefit is greater than the cost since it is arbitrary and burdensome.
• The proposal is not consistent in itself since it does not con-sider the concept of an investing finance subcategory.
• The operating finance subcategory is better to be included in a debt category.
Lead Country’s Suggestion
• It is appropriate to divide until reaching the operating cate-gory level; the operating finance subcategory is unnecessary.
2. Operating Finance Subcategory continued
17
3. Direct & Indirect CF Statement
18
What is the main issue?
• To identify applicable and accommodating method to both users and preparers of financial information.
Revenue
Cost
Profit
Cash Inflow
Cash Outflow
Operating CF
direct
indirect
The IASB Staff Draft’s Proposal
• Operating CF shall be prepared in a direct method
Changes from the DP to the Staff Draft
• The proposal of the DP created considerable controversy be-tween an indirect and a direct method.
• Nevertheless, the boards retained the proposal to present all CF directly, including operating CF.
3. Direct & Indirect CF Statement continued
19
WG’s Comments
• The current accounting system is mostly based on an accrual basis.
• The users are accustomed to the indirect CF statement.
• The cost to maintain the required cash receipts and pay-ments will be tremendous.
• In Japan’s case most preparers prefer the indirect method.
Lead Country’s Suggestion
• The boards should still consider whether the direct method would improve the CF statement’s usefulness compared to the cost.
3. Direct & Indirect CF Statement continued
20
4. Reconciliation of Income to CF
21
What is the main issue?
• To identify the type of income to focus on and its appropriate place to be put.
Operating Income Operating CF
Net Income
SCI or Notes
The IASB Staff Draft’s Proposal
• A reconciliation is required to be presented as part of the statement of CF.
• An entity shall present a reconciliation of operating income to operating CF.
Changes from the DP to the Staff Draft
• It should be an integral part of the SCF
• Operating income is adjusted to operating CF, but not with each account.
4. Reconciliation of Income to CF continued
22
WG’s Comments
• It might distract users’ attention if the reconciliation is an in-tegral part of the SCF.
• Net income is vested to shareholders, not operating income.
Lead Country’s Suggestion
• The reconciliation should be disclosed as a note.
• It is more appropriate to reconcile from net income to operat-ing CF.
4. Reconciliation of Income to CF continued
23
5. Multi-category Transaction
24
What is the main issue?
• To articulate a suitable accounting policy for basket transac-tion.
The IASB Staff Draft’s Proposal
• The net effects on SCI and SCF shall be classified in the multi-category transaction section.
Changes from the DP to the Staff Draft
• The boards did not reach a preliminary view in the DP, and requested comments from the respondents.
• The multi-category transaction section is introduced.
5. Multi-category Transaction continued
25
WG’s Comments
• The proposal is not consistent with the cohesiveness princi-ple.
• Other standards, such as IAS 16 and IFRS 3, require alloca-tion for basket transactions.
• Classification in an independent section is more pragmatic and cost-effective than allocations.
Lead Country’s Suggestion
• The multi-category transaction should be allocated.
5. Multi-category Transaction continued
26
6. Cash & Cash Equivalents
27
What is the main issue?
• To articulate appropriate guidelines for cash and cash equiva-lents.
or
The IASB Staff Draft’s Proposal
• Cash equivalents shall be classified as short-term invest-ments regardless of their liquidity or maturity.
Changes from the DP to the Staff Draft
• There was not a congruent opinion upon the DP.
• However, the statement of the staff draft is identical to the DP without more persuasive explanation.
6. Cash & Cash Equivalents continued
28
WG’s Comments
• Cash equivalents function mostly the same as cash.
• Current requirements should remain until a sufficient princi-ple is identified
• Cash equivalents have different economic characteristics than cash.
Lead Country’s Suggestion
• Entities should not be prevented from classifying cash equiv-alents in the operating category.
6. Cash & Cash Equivalents continued
29
Contents
30
Working GroupDiscussion TopicsSummary
Background
Summary
31
Topic Key words
1. Operating & Investing Categories “Core and non-core” principle& Three section, no category
2. Operating Finance Subcategory Unnecessary
3. Direct & Indirect CF Statement Indirect method
4. Reconciliation of income to CF Note disclosure & Net income
5. Multi-category Transaction Allocation
6. Cash & Cash Equivalents Operating category
Thank you !!
32