1
Health Professionals Academic Institutions Health Administrators BUILDING HEALTH SYSTEMS BASED ON PEOPLE’S NEEDS Uncoordinated Partnerships 1. Discovery asking positive questions, seeking what works, what empowers, what gives life to our community or group, when have we felt particularly energized 2. Dream – visioning of what could be, where we want to go 3. Design – making an action plan based on what we can do, and making personal commitments 4. Delivery start taking actions now A belief that the future can be built on the lessons learned from the best of the past. A search for new knowledge to enrich the images of the future. A theory that acknowledges that collective action is a vital part of creating a way to enact the values and vision of a group, an organization, or a society. A realization that human systems can create what they imagine. Appreciative Inquiry Partnership Pentagram Policy Makers Academic Institutions Policy Makers Communities Health Professionals Communities Health Professionals Academic Institutions Communities Policy Makers Health Administrators Health Professionals Health Administrators Academic Institutions Health Administrators Policy Makers Health Professionals Health Administrators Communities Health Administrators Health Professionals Partnership at all scales of the system National Provincial Regional Local Relevance: Services oriented towards priority needs of high risk population Quality: Practice according to norms Improvement of population health User satisfaction Cost-effectiveness: Sharing roles Cost control Information exchange Appropriate use of resources Equity: Availability and access of services for all Empowerment of people People’s and population needs Characteristics of Socially Accountable Health System University Of British Columbia Systems Design Educational Needs and Resources Social Contract and Elections System Management Health Professional Education Clinical Practice Working Conditions Distributed Education Health Needs Assessment Service Delivery A Pentagram Partnership that embraces all partners simultaneously with an appreciative inquiry approach to building upon existing strengths is an effective route to positive systems change. These partnerships are most effective when developed at all scales in a complex system. This approach can succeed where standard planning and partnership development methods (SWOT analysis, gap identification, monetary incentivization, etc.) fail. Conclusion Health Professionals Policy Makers Health Administrators Academic Institutions Communities Four Ds: Prof. Robert Woollard, MD CCFP FCFP LM Email: [email protected]

Research | Family - Practice Research - BUILDING …...can succeed where standard planning and partnership development methods (SWOT analysis, gap identification, monetary incentivization,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Research | Family - Practice Research - BUILDING …...can succeed where standard planning and partnership development methods (SWOT analysis, gap identification, monetary incentivization,

Health

Professionals

Academic

Institutions

Health

Administrators

BUILDING HEALTH SYSTEMS BASED ON PEOPLE’S NEEDS

Uncoordinated Partnerships

1. Discovery – asking positive questions, seeking whatworks, what empowers, what gives life to ourcommunity or group, when have we felt particularlyenergized

2. Dream – visioning of what could be, where we want togo

3. Design – making an action plan based on what wecan do, and making personal commitments

4. Delivery – start taking actions now

A belief that the future can be built on the lessonslearned from the best of the past.

A search for new knowledge to enrich the images ofthe future.

A theory that acknowledges that collective action is avital part of creating a way to enact the values andvision of a group, an organization, or a society.

A realization that human systems can create what theyimagine.

Appreciative Inquiry

Partnership Pentagram

Policy Makers

Academic

Institutions

Policy Makers

Communities

Health

Professionals

Communities

Health

Professionals

Academic

InstitutionsCommunities

Policy Makers

Health

Administrators

Health

ProfessionalsHealth

Administrators

Academic

Institutions

Health

Administrators

Policy Makers

Health

ProfessionalsHealth

Administrators

Communities

Health

AdministratorsHealth

Professionals

Partnership at all scales of the system

National

Provincial

Regional

Local

Relevance:

Services oriented towards priority needs of high risk population

Quality:Practice according to norms

Improvement of population health

User satisfaction

Cost-effectiveness:Sharing roles

Cost control

Information exchange

Appropriate use of resources

Equity:

Availability and access of services for all

Empowerment of people

People’s

and

population

needs

Characteristics of Socially Accountable Health System

University Of British Columbia

Systems Design

Educational Needs

and Resources

Social Contract

and Elections

System

Management

Health Professional

Education

Clinical Practice

Working Conditions

Distributed

Education

Health Needs

Assessment

Service Delivery

A Pentagram Partnership that embraces all partners simultaneously with an appreciative inquiry approach to building upon existing strengths is an

effective route to positive systems change. These partnerships are most effective when developed at all scales in a complex system. This approach

can succeed where standard planning and partnership development methods (SWOT analysis, gap identification, monetary incentivization, etc.) fail.

Conclusion

Health

Professionals

Policy Makers

Health

Administrators

Academic

InstitutionsCommunities

Four “Ds”:

Prof. Robert Woollard, MD CCFP FCFP LM

Email: [email protected]