Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Research ArticleFlows with Slip of Oldroyd-B Fluids over a Moving Plate
Abdul Shakeel1 Sohail Ahmad2 Hamid Khan1 Nehad Ali Shah3 and Sami Ul Haq4
1Department of Mathematics FAST-National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences PeshawarKhyber Pakhtunkhwa 25000 Pakistan2Department of Mathematics COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Attock Kamra Road Punjab 43600 Pakistan3Abdus Salam School of Mathematical Sciences Government College University Lahore Punjab 54000 Pakistan4Department of Mathematics Islamia College Peshawar Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 25000 Pakistan
Correspondence should be addressed to Sohail Ahmad drsohailahmadciit-attockedupk
Received 12 November 2015 Revised 3 March 2016 Accepted 13 March 2016
Academic Editor Luigi C Berselli
Copyright copy 2016 Abdul Shakeel et al This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licensewhich permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited
A general investigation has been made and analytic solutions are provided corresponding to the flows of an Oldroyd-B fluid underthe consideration of slip condition at the boundaryThe fluid motion is generated by the flat plate which has a translational motionin its plane with a time-dependent velocityThe adequate integral transform approach is employed to find analytic solutions for thevelocity field Solutions for the flows corresponding to Maxwell fluid second-grade fluid and Newtonian fluid are also determinedin both cases namely flows with slip on the boundary and flows with no slip on the boundary respectively Some of our resultswere compared with other results from the literature The effects of several emerging dimensionless and pertinent parameters onthe fluid velocity have been studied theoretically as well as graphically in the paper
1 Introduction
Many materials in industry for instance grease polymermelts drillingmud clay coating suspensions certain oil anddifferent emulsions behave in such a way that we cannotdescribe mathematically through Navier-Stokes equationsFor this reason it is now generally accepted that non-New-tonian fluid models are more appropriate than Newtonianones and in practical applications the behavior of non-Newtonian fluids cannot be replaced with that of Newto-nian fluids Therefore the study of non-Newtonian fluidshas become very important due to their large number ofapplications in industry
The reader can see [1] for the latest and complete dis-cussion onOldroyd-B fluidmodels To the best of the authorsrsquoknowledge the first exact solutions corresponding to thesefluid models seem to be those obtained by Tanner [2] Fur-thermore some other useful as well as simpler solutions canbe found in [3] regarding the study of Oldroyd-B fluids
In the above studies the effect of fluid slippage is notconsideredTheflowof fluids induced by amotion of a plate iscalled Stokes flow Solution for some Stokes flows in different
geometries and under the assumption of no-slip boundarycondition can be found in [4ndash7]
However the no-slip condition is inadequate in severalsituations for instance mechanics of thin fluids problemshavingmultiple interfacesmicrochannel flows flows inwavytubes and flows of polymeric liquids with high molecularweight [8]
It is vital to study the effect of fluid slippage as it findsmany applications in industry When a surface moves theslip is mainly produced by the roughness of surface and rar-efaction of the fluid and the velocity on the surface Navier[9] proposed slip boundary condition in which it was statedthat the velocity of the fluid depends on the shear stressFor describing the slip that occurs at solid boundaries alarge number of models have been proposed [10] Otherstudies of slip at the boundary can be seen in [11ndash14] Somenon-Newtonian fluids such as polymer melts often exhibitmacroscopic wall slip which is generally described by anonlinear relation between wall slip velocity and the frictionat the wall
The aim of the present communication is to study Stokesflows of an Oldroyd-B fluid on a flat plate under the slip
Hindawi Publishing CorporationAdvances in Mathematical PhysicsVolume 2016 Article ID 8619634 9 pageshttpdxdoiorg10115520168619634
2 Advances in Mathematical Physics
boundary conditions assumption between the plate and thefluid The motion of the plate is a rectilinear translation in itsplane Exact expressions for the velocity are determined bymeans of the Laplace transforms Expressions for the relativevelocity are also determined and the solutions correspondingto flows with no slip at the boundary are presented Theparticular case namely sine oscillations of thewall is studiedSome relevant properties of the velocity and comparisonsbetween solutions with slip and no slip at the boundary arepresented by using graphical illustrations generated by thesoftware Mathcad
2 Mathematical Formulation of the Problem
We consider an incompressible Oldroyd-B fluid occupyingthe space over an infinite plate which is situated in the (119909 119911)-plane of the Cartesian coordinate system with the positive 119910-axis in the upward direction Initially both the fluid and theplate are at rest At 119905 = 0
+ the fluid is set in motion by theplate which begins to move along the 119909-axis The velocity ofthe plate is assumed to be of the form119880
119900119891(119905) where119880
119900gt 0 is
a constant and 119891(119905) is a piecewise continuous dimensionlessfunction defined on [0infin) and 119891(0) = 0 Furthermore wesuppose that the Laplace transformof the function119891 exists Inthe case of parallel flow along the 119909-axis the velocity vector is^ = (119906(119910 119905) 0 0)whereas [15ndash17] lead us to the following gov-erning equation
120582
1205972119906 (119910 119905)
1205971199052
+
120597119906 (119910 119905)
120597119905
= ](1 + 120582119903
120597
120597119905
)
1205972119906 (119910 119905)
1205971199102
(1)
where 120582 is the relaxation time 120582119903is the retardation time ] =
120583120588 is the kinematic viscosity 120583 is the dynamic viscosity and120588 is the constant density of the fluid In this work we considerthe existence of slip at the wall and assume that the relativevelocity between the velocity of the fluid at the wall 119906(0 119905)and the speed of the wall is proportional to the shear rate atthewall [18 19]The adequate initial and boundary conditionsare given by
119906 (0 119905) minus 120573
120597119906 (0 119905)
120597119910
= 119880119900119891 (119905) 120573 ge 0 119905 gt 0
119906 (119910 0) =
120597119906 (119910 0)
120597119905
= 0 119910 ge 0
119906 (119910 119905) 997888rarr 0 for 119910 997888rarr infin
(2)
where 120573 is the slip coefficientBy using the characteristic time119879 introducing the follow-
ing nondimensional quantities to (1) and (2)
119905lowast
=
119905
119879
119879 gt 0
119910lowast
=
119910
119880119900119879
119906lowast
=
119906
119880119900
120582lowast
=
120582
119879
120582119903
lowast
=
120582119903
119879
120573lowast
=
120573
119880119900119879
119892 (119905lowast
) = 119891 (119879119905lowast
)
(3)
and dropping out the lowast notation we get the following non-dimensional problem
120582
1205972119906 (119910 119905)
1205971199052
+
120597119906 (119910 119905)
120597119905
=
1
Re(1 + 120582
119903
120597
120597119905
)
1205972119906 (119910 119905)
1205971199102
(4)
The nondimensional initial and boundary conditions are
119906 (0 119905) minus 120573
120597119906 (0 119905)
120597119910
= 119892 (119905) for 119905 gt 0 (5a)
119906 (119910 0) =
120597119906 (119910 0)
120597119905
= 0 for 119910 gt 0 (5b)
119906 (119910 119905) 997888rarr 0 for 119910 997888rarr infin (5c)
with Re = 119880119900
2119879] the Reynolds number
3 Calculations for Velocity Field
31 Oldroyd-B Fluid with Slip at the Wall Applying Laplacetransform to (4) (5a) and (5c) and using (5b) we obtain thetransformed problem
1205972119906 (119910 119902)
1205971199102
minus
Re (1205821199022 + 119902)(1 + 120582
119903119902)
119906 (119910 119902) = 0 (6)
119906 (0 119902) minus 120573
120597119906 (0 119902)
120597119910
= 119866 (119902) (7)
119906 (119910 119902) 997888rarr 0 119910 997888rarr infin (8)
The solution of the set of (6)ndash(8) is given by
119906 (119910 119902) = 119865 (119910 119902) sdot 119866 (119902) (9)
where
119865 (119910 119902) =
119887 exp (minus119886radic(1205821199022 + 119902) (120582119903119902 + 1))
119887 + radic(1205821199022+ 119902) (120582
119903119902 + 1)
119886 = 119910radicRe 119887 = 1
120573radicRe
(10)
and 119866(119902) = 119871119892(119905)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 3
In order to obtain the inverse Laplace transform of func-tion 119906(119910 119902) we consider the auxiliary functions
1198651(119910 119902) =
119887 exp (minus119886radic119902)119887 + radic119902
119908 (119902) =
1205821199022+ 119902
120582119903119902 + 1
(11)
Seeing that 119865(119910 119902) = 1198651[119910 119908(119902)] we have
119891 (119910 119905) = 119871minus1
119865 (119910 119902) = int
infin
0
1198911(119910 119909) ℎ (119909 119905) 119889119909 (12)
where
1198911(119910 119905) = 119871
minus1
1198651(119910 119902)
=
119890minus1199102Re4119905
120573radicRe120587119905
minus
1
1205732Re
119890119910120573+119905120573
2ReErfc(119910radicRe2radic119905
+
1
120573
radic119905
Re)
(13)
and ℎ(119909 119905) = 119871minus1exp(minus119909119908(119902)) is given by
ℎ (119909 119905) = exp (120574119909) 120575 (119905 minus 120582119909
120582119903
) minus radic
120574119909
120582119903119905 minus 120582119909
sdot 1198691(
2
120582119903
radic120574119909 (120582119903119905 minus 120582119909))
sdot exp((2120582 minus 120582
119903) 119909 minus 120582
119903119905
120582119903
2)
(14)
with 120574 = (120582 minus 120582119903)120582119903
2Now introducing 119891
1(119910 119905) and ℎ(119909 119905) into (12) we obtain
119891 (119910 119905) =
119887radic120582119903
radic120582120587119905
exp(minus120582Re1199102
4120582119903119905
+
120574120582119903
120582
119905) minus
1205821199031198872
120582
sdot exp(119910119887radicRe +1198872+ 120574
120582
120582119903119905)Erfc(
119910radic120582Re2radic120582119903119905
+ 119887radic120582119903119905
120582
) + int
infin
0
[
119887
radic120587119909
sdot exp(minus1199102Re4119909
+
(2120582 minus 120582119903) 119909 minus 120582
119903119905
120582119903
2)
minus 1198872exp(119910119887radicRe + 1198872119909 +
(2120582 minus 120582119903) 119909 minus 120582
119903119905
120582119903
2)
sdot Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)] times radic
120574119909
120582119903119905 minus 120582119909
sdot 1198691(
2
120582119903
sdot radic120574119909 (120582119903119905 minus 120582119909)) 119889119909
(15)
and the velocity field corresponding to the flow with slip atthe wall of an Oldroyd-B fluid is given by
119906119904(119910 119905) = (119891 lowast 119892) (119905) = int
119905
0
119891 (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904 (16)
where 119891(119910 119905) is given by (15)
32 Oldroyd-B Fluid with No Slip at the Wall In this particu-lar case function 119865(119910 119902) given by (10) becomes
119865ns (119910 119902) = exp(minus119910radicReradic1205821199022+ 119902
120582119903119902 + 1
) (17)
By using the auxiliary functions
1198651ns (119910 119902) = exp (minus119910radicRe 119902)
1198911ns (119910 119905) =
119910radicRe2119905radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
)
(18)
together with the relation
119891ns (119910 119905) = 119871minus1
119865ns (119910 119902) = int
infin
0
1198911ns (119910 119909)
sdot ℎ (119909 119905) 119889119909 =
119910radicRe 1205822radic120587120582
119903
119905minus32exp(
120574120582119903
120582
119905
minus
1199102Re 1205824120582119903119905
) minus
119910radicRe 1205742radic120587
sdot int
infin
0
119890minus1199102Re4119909+((2120582minus120582
119903)119909minus120582119903119905)120582119903
2
sdot
1
119909radic120582119903119905 minus 120582119909
1198691(
2
120582119903
radic120574119909 (120582119903119905 minus 120582119909)) 119889119909
(19)
The velocity field corresponding to the flow with no-slipconditions of the Oldroyd-B fluid is given by
119906ns (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119891ns (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904 =2
radic120587
sdot int
infin
119910radicRe1205822radic120582119903119905
119890minus1199112+120574Re119910241199112
119892(119905 minus
120582Re1199102
41205821199031199112)119889119911
minus
119910radicRe 1205742radic120587
sdot int
infin
0
int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
119890minus1199102Re4119909+((2120582minus120582
119903)119909minus120582119903119904)120582119903
2
119909radic120582119903119904 minus 120582119909
times 1198691(
2
120582119903
radic120574119909 (120582119903119904 minus 120582119909)) 119889119904 119889119909
(20)
4 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It is important to point out that the solution given by (20)is similar to that obtained recently by Fetecau et al [20 Eq(428)]
33 Maxwell Fluid with Slip Condition For the flows of Max-well fluids with slip condition at the wall (10) becomes
119865sM (119910 119902)
=
(119887radic2) exp(minus119910radic120582Reradic(119902 + 12120582)2 minus (12120582)2)
119887radic2 + radic(119902 + 12120582)2
minus (12120582)2
= 1198871exp
(minus119910radic120582Reradic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1)
1198871
+ radic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1= 1198651(119910radic119908
1(119902))
(21)
where 1198651(sdot sdot) is given by (11) and 119908
1(119902) = (119902 + 119886
1)2
minus 1198862
1 1198871=
119887radic120582 and 1198861= 12120582
The inverse Laplace transform of function (21) is
119891sm (119910 119905) = [1198911(119910 119905)
+ 1198861int
119905
0
1198911(1199101
radic1199052minus 1199062) 1198681(119886 119906) 119889119906] 119890
minus1198861119905
sdot
1198871119890minus1199102Re1205824119905minus119886
1119905
radic120587119905
minus 1198872
11198901199101198871radicRe120582+1198872
1119905minus1198861119905Erfc(
119910radicRe 1205822radic119905
+ 119887radic119905)
+ 1198861119890minus1198861119905
int
119905
0
[
1198871119890minus1199102Re1205824119911minus119886
1119911
radic120587119911
minus 1198872
11198901199101198871radicRe120582+1198872
1minus1198861119911Erfc(
119910radicRe 1205822radic119911
+ 1198871radic119911)]
sdot
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911
(22)
and the velocity field is given by
119906sM (119910 119905) = (119891 lowast 119892) (119905) = int
119905
0
119891SM (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904 (23)
34 Maxwell Fluid with No Slip at the Wall Making 120573 rarr 0
and therefore 119887 rarr 0 into (21) or 120582119903rarr 0 into (17) we have
119865nsM (119910 119902) = exp(minus119910radicReradic1205821199022 + 119902)
= exp(minus119910radicRe 120582radic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1)
(24)
Using the formula
119871minus1
119890minus119910radicRe120582radic119902
= ℎ1(119910 119905) =
119910radicRe 120582119890minus1199102Re1205824119905
2119905radic120587119905
(25)
we obtain
119891nsM (119910 119905) = [ℎ1(119910 119905)
+ 1198861int
119905
0
ℎ1(119910 119911)
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911]
sdot 119890minus1198861119905
=
119910radicRe 1205822119905radic120587119905
119890minus1199102Re1205824119905minus119886
1119905
+ 1198861119890minus1198861119905
int
119905
0
119910radicRe 1205822119911radic120587119911
119890minus1199102Re1205824119911
sdot
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911
(26)
and the velocity field
119906nsM (119910 119905) = (119891 lowast 119892) (119905) = int
119905
0
119891nsM (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904
=
2
radic120587
int
infin
119910radicRe1205822radic119905119890minus1199112minus1198861120582Re119910241199112
119892(119905
minus
120582Re1199102
41199112)119889119911 + 119886
1int
119905
0
int
119904
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
sdot
119910radicRe 1205822119911radic120587119911
119890minus1199102Re1205824119911minus119886
1119904
sdot
119911
radic1199042minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199042minus 1199112) 119889119904 119889119911
(27)
35 Second-Grade Fluid with Slip at the Wall Making 120582 rarr 0
into (10) and (14) and using the results
1198721=
119887
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903119889119909
radic119909
=
119887
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890(minus1199102Re120582
119903)41199112minus1199112
2radic120582119903119889119911
= 119887radic120582119903
2
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890minus1199112minus(119910radicRe120582
119903)241199112
119889119911
= 119887radic120582119903
2
radic120587
sdot
radic120587
2
119890minus1sdot119910radicReradic120582
119903= 119887radic120582
119903119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903
(28)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 5
we obtain the velocity field of the second-grade fluid with slipat the wall in the equivalent forms
119906sSG (119910 119905) = 119887radic120582119903119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903119892 (119905) minus 119887
2
119890119887119910radicRe
119892 (119905)
sdot int
infin
0
1198901198872119909minus119909120582
119903Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)119889119909 +
1
120582119903
sdot int
infin
0
[
119887119890minus1199102Re4119909
radic120587119909
minus 1198872
119890119910119887radicRe+1198872119909Erfc(
119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)]
sdot 119890(minus119909+119905)120582
119903radic
119909
119905
1198681(
2
120582119903
radic119909119905)119889119909
(29)
or
119906sSG (119910 119905) = 119887 (1198872radic120582119903minus 119887 + radic120582
119903) 119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903119892 (119905)
+
119890minus119905120582119903
radic120582119903119905
119892 (119905) times int
infin
0
[
119887119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903
radic120587119909
minus 1198872
119890119887119910radicRe+1198872119909minus119909120582
119903Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)]
sdot radic1199091198681(
2
radic120582119903
radic119909119905)119889119909
(30)
36 Second-Grade FluidwithNo-SlipCondition Making120582 rarr0 into (17) and using (18) and (28) we have
119906nsSG (119910 119905) = 119890minus119910radicRe120582
119903119892 (119905) +
119910radicRe2120582119903radic120587
sdot int
infin
0
int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
119909radic119904
119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903minus1199041205821199031198681(
2
120582119903
sdot radic119909119904) 119889119904 119889119909
(31)
37 Newtonian Fluid withwithout Slip Condition Thesecases are obtained easily from (6) and (10) by making 120582 =
120582119903= 0 We obtain the following expressions for the velocity
field
119906sN (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 120591) VsN (119910 120591) 119889120591
119906nsN (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 120591) VnsN (119910 120591) 119889120591
(32)
where
VsN (119910 119905) =1
120573radicRe1
radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
) minus (
1
120573radicRe)
2
sdot exp(119910
120573
+
119905
1205732Re
)
sdot erfc(119910radicRe2radic119905
+
radic119905
120573radicRe)
(33)
for flows with slip on the boundary and
VnsN (119910 119905) =119910radicRe2119905radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
) (34)
for flows with no slip on the boundary respectivelyWemention that the results given by (33) and (34) are the
same as those obtained by Fetecau et al (see [21] Eq (29) for119872 = 0 120574 replaced by 120573radicRe and 119910 replaced by 119910radicRe)
Also if in our results we consider 119892(119905) = sin(120596119905) or 119892(119905) =cos(120596119905) (32)ndash(34) become equivalent to the results of Khaledand Vafai (see [22] Eqs (8) (9) (10) (16)) and to the resultsobtained by Hayat et al (see [23] Eqs (13) (14) with119872 = 0
and119870 rarrinfin)In the case of no slip on the boundary our solution (32)
together with (34) is identical with the result obtained byFetecau et al (see [24] Eq (31) with119870eff = 0)
4 Numerical Results and Conclusions
In this paper we have studied the flow of Oldroyd-B fluidsgenerated by a moving flat plate Using Laplace transformmethod we obtained analytical expressions of the velocityfor both cases of flows with slip at the boundary and withoutslip on the boundary The plate velocity was considered in ageneral form119880
0119891(119905) therefore solutions for several practical
problems can be obtained by choosing suitable forms of thefunction 119891(119905) From the dimensionless form of the studiedproblem it can be seen that only Reynolds number andnondimensional relaxation and retardation time influencethe fluid flows From this reason the numerical studies aremade for several values of Reynolds number and of the time119905 Graphs of velocity were plotted versus spatial coordinate 119910for the case of translation of the plate with constant velocitynamely for119891(119905) = 1 Velocity fields corresponding to flows ofMaxwell fluid second-grade fluid and Newtonian fluid werealso determined in both cases namely flows with slip on theboundary and flows with no slip on the boundary In orderto study the physical behavior of the fluid some numericalsimulations were made using the Mathcad software In Fig-ures 1 and 2 curves corresponding to velocity of the Oldroyd-B fluid for 120582 = 025 and 120582
119903= 015 and the dimensionless
friction coefficient 120573 = 075 are sketched In Figures 1 and2 the velocity curves for three values of time 119905 and for threevalues of Reynolds number Re in the case of flow with slip atthe plate and in the case of no slip at the plate are plotted
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
08
06
04
02
0
Velo
city
1
08
06
04
02
0
t = 5
t = 3
t = 15
minus02
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
u(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Figure 1 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different Reynolds number
For a fixed value of the time 119905 or for a fixed value of theReynolds number the issues whichmust be highlighted are asfollows
The fluid flows more slowly if slippage occurs on theboundary Increasing of the Reynolds number values leads
to slowing of the flows in both cases with or without slip Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then it increases thethickness of the velocity boundary layer
Figure 3 was drawn in order to compare the velocityflows for Oldroyd-B Maxwell and Newtonian fluids It is
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
1
08
06
04
02
0
0
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
Re = 05
Re = 25
Re = 10
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t = 20 slipt = 50 slip
t = 05 slip
minus02
08
06
04
02
minus02
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
Figure 2 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different values of the time 119905
important to note that for the flow with no slip on theboundary the velocity of Maxwell fluid has significant varia-tions in the area near plateThis no longer occurs if the flow iswith slip at the boundary Also the thickness of the boundary
layer of the Maxwell fluid is the smallest and the speed of thistype of fluid becomes zero more quickly than other fluids Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then the differencesbetween velocities of the three fluids become insignificant
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
t = 05
t = 075
t = 155
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Figure 3 Comparison between velocity profiles of three fluid models with slip condition with 120573 = 055 and no-slip condition for Re = 065120582 = 055 and 120582
119903= 035
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
References
[1] K R Rajagopal and A R Srinivasa ldquoA thermodynamic framework for rate type fluid modelsrdquo Journal of Non-NewtonianFluid Mechanics vol 88 no 3 pp 207ndash227 2000
[2] R I Tanner ldquoNote on the Rayleigh problem for a visco-elasticfluidrdquo Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik vol13 no 6 pp 573ndash580 1962
[3] K R Rajagopal and R K Bhatnagar ldquoExact solutions for somesimple flows of an Oldroyd-B fluidrdquo Acta Mechanica vol 113no 1 pp 233ndash239 1995
[4] N D Waters and M J King ldquoUnsteady flow of an elastico-viscous liquidrdquo Rheologica Acta vol 9 no 3 pp 345ndash355 1970
[5] P Puri and P K Kythe ldquoStokes first and second problems forRivlin-Ericksen fluids with neoclassical heat conditionrdquo ASMEJournal of Heat Transfer vol 120 pp 44ndash50 1996
[6] P M Jordan and A Puri ldquoRevisiting Stokesrsquo first problem forMaxwell fluidsrdquoTheQuarterly Journal ofMechanics and AppliedMathematics vol 58 no 2 pp 213ndash227 2005
[7] C Fetecau D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoA note on the secondproblem of Stokes for Newtonian fluidsrdquo International Journalof Non-Linear Mechanics vol 43 no 5 pp 451ndash457 2008
[8] R I Tanner ldquoPartial wall slip in polymer flowrdquo Industrial andEngineering Chemistry Research vol 33 no 10 pp 2434ndash24361994
[9] M Navier ldquoMemoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluidsrdquoMemoires de lrsquoAcademie des Sciences de LrsquoInstitut de France vol6 pp 389ndash440 1823
[10] I J Rao and K R Rajagopal ldquoThe effect of the slip boundarycondition on the flow of fluids in a channelrdquo Acta Mechanicavol 135 no 3-4 pp 113ndash126 1999
[11] M Mooney ldquoExplicit formulas for slip and fluidityrdquo Journal ofRheology vol 2 no 2 pp 210ndash222 1931
[12] K B Migler H Hervet and L Leger ldquoSlip transition of a pol-ymer melt under shear stressrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 70no 3 pp 287ndash290 1993
[13] S Das S K Guchhait and R N Jana ldquoHall effects on unsteadyhydromagnetic flow past an accelerated porous plate in arotating systemrdquo Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics vol 8 no3 pp 409ndash417 2015
[14] A S Chethan G N Sekhar and P G Siddheshwar ldquoFlow andheat transfer of an exponential stretching sheet in a viscoelasticliquid with navier slip boundary conditionrdquo Journal of AppliedFluid Mechanics vol 8 no 2 pp 223ndash229 2015
[15] M Khan R Malik and A Anjum ldquoExact solutions of MHDsecond Stokes flow of generalized Burgers fluidrdquo Applied Math-ematics and Mechanics vol 36 no 2 pp 211ndash224 2015
[16] I Khan F Ali and S Shafie ldquoStokesrsquo second problem for mag-netohydrodynamics flow in a Burgersrsquo fluid the cases 120574 = 120582
2
4
and 120574 gt 1205822
4rdquo PLoS ONE vol 8 no 5 Article ID e61531 2013[17] A M Siddiqui T Haroon M Zahid and A Shahzad ldquoEffect of
slip condition on unsteady flows of an oldroyd-B fluid betweenparallel platesrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 13 no 11 pp2282ndash2287 2011
[18] DVieru andAA Zafar ldquoSomeCouette flows of aMaxwell fluidwith wall slip conditionrdquo Applied Mathematics amp InformationSciences vol 7 no 1 pp 209ndash219 2013
[19] D Vieru and A Rauf ldquoStokes flows of a Maxwell fluid with wallslip conditionrdquo Canadian Journal of Physics vol 89 no 10 pp1061ndash1071 2011
[20] C Fetecau N Nigar D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoFirst generalsolution for unidirectional motions of rate type fluids over aninfinite platerdquoCommunications inNumerical Analysis vol 2 pp125ndash138 2015
[21] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and I Pop ldquoSlip effects on theunsteady radiative MHD free convection flow over a movingplate with mass diffusion and heat sourcerdquoThe European Phys-ical Journal Plus vol 130 article 6 2015
[22] A-R A Khaled and K Vafai ldquoThe effect of the slip conditionon Stokes and Couette flows due to an oscillating wall exactsolutionsrdquo International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics vol39 no 5 pp 795ndash809 2004
[23] T Hayat M F Afzaal C Fetecau and A A Hendi ldquoSlip effectson the oscillatory flow in a porous mediumrdquo Journal of PorousMedia vol 14 no 6 pp 481ndash493 2011
[24] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and S Akhter ldquoGeneral solu-tions for magnetohydrodynamic natural convection flow withradiative heat transfer and slip condition over a moving platerdquoZeitschrift fur Naturforschung A vol 68 pp 659ndash667 2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
2 Advances in Mathematical Physics
boundary conditions assumption between the plate and thefluid The motion of the plate is a rectilinear translation in itsplane Exact expressions for the velocity are determined bymeans of the Laplace transforms Expressions for the relativevelocity are also determined and the solutions correspondingto flows with no slip at the boundary are presented Theparticular case namely sine oscillations of thewall is studiedSome relevant properties of the velocity and comparisonsbetween solutions with slip and no slip at the boundary arepresented by using graphical illustrations generated by thesoftware Mathcad
2 Mathematical Formulation of the Problem
We consider an incompressible Oldroyd-B fluid occupyingthe space over an infinite plate which is situated in the (119909 119911)-plane of the Cartesian coordinate system with the positive 119910-axis in the upward direction Initially both the fluid and theplate are at rest At 119905 = 0
+ the fluid is set in motion by theplate which begins to move along the 119909-axis The velocity ofthe plate is assumed to be of the form119880
119900119891(119905) where119880
119900gt 0 is
a constant and 119891(119905) is a piecewise continuous dimensionlessfunction defined on [0infin) and 119891(0) = 0 Furthermore wesuppose that the Laplace transformof the function119891 exists Inthe case of parallel flow along the 119909-axis the velocity vector is^ = (119906(119910 119905) 0 0)whereas [15ndash17] lead us to the following gov-erning equation
120582
1205972119906 (119910 119905)
1205971199052
+
120597119906 (119910 119905)
120597119905
= ](1 + 120582119903
120597
120597119905
)
1205972119906 (119910 119905)
1205971199102
(1)
where 120582 is the relaxation time 120582119903is the retardation time ] =
120583120588 is the kinematic viscosity 120583 is the dynamic viscosity and120588 is the constant density of the fluid In this work we considerthe existence of slip at the wall and assume that the relativevelocity between the velocity of the fluid at the wall 119906(0 119905)and the speed of the wall is proportional to the shear rate atthewall [18 19]The adequate initial and boundary conditionsare given by
119906 (0 119905) minus 120573
120597119906 (0 119905)
120597119910
= 119880119900119891 (119905) 120573 ge 0 119905 gt 0
119906 (119910 0) =
120597119906 (119910 0)
120597119905
= 0 119910 ge 0
119906 (119910 119905) 997888rarr 0 for 119910 997888rarr infin
(2)
where 120573 is the slip coefficientBy using the characteristic time119879 introducing the follow-
ing nondimensional quantities to (1) and (2)
119905lowast
=
119905
119879
119879 gt 0
119910lowast
=
119910
119880119900119879
119906lowast
=
119906
119880119900
120582lowast
=
120582
119879
120582119903
lowast
=
120582119903
119879
120573lowast
=
120573
119880119900119879
119892 (119905lowast
) = 119891 (119879119905lowast
)
(3)
and dropping out the lowast notation we get the following non-dimensional problem
120582
1205972119906 (119910 119905)
1205971199052
+
120597119906 (119910 119905)
120597119905
=
1
Re(1 + 120582
119903
120597
120597119905
)
1205972119906 (119910 119905)
1205971199102
(4)
The nondimensional initial and boundary conditions are
119906 (0 119905) minus 120573
120597119906 (0 119905)
120597119910
= 119892 (119905) for 119905 gt 0 (5a)
119906 (119910 0) =
120597119906 (119910 0)
120597119905
= 0 for 119910 gt 0 (5b)
119906 (119910 119905) 997888rarr 0 for 119910 997888rarr infin (5c)
with Re = 119880119900
2119879] the Reynolds number
3 Calculations for Velocity Field
31 Oldroyd-B Fluid with Slip at the Wall Applying Laplacetransform to (4) (5a) and (5c) and using (5b) we obtain thetransformed problem
1205972119906 (119910 119902)
1205971199102
minus
Re (1205821199022 + 119902)(1 + 120582
119903119902)
119906 (119910 119902) = 0 (6)
119906 (0 119902) minus 120573
120597119906 (0 119902)
120597119910
= 119866 (119902) (7)
119906 (119910 119902) 997888rarr 0 119910 997888rarr infin (8)
The solution of the set of (6)ndash(8) is given by
119906 (119910 119902) = 119865 (119910 119902) sdot 119866 (119902) (9)
where
119865 (119910 119902) =
119887 exp (minus119886radic(1205821199022 + 119902) (120582119903119902 + 1))
119887 + radic(1205821199022+ 119902) (120582
119903119902 + 1)
119886 = 119910radicRe 119887 = 1
120573radicRe
(10)
and 119866(119902) = 119871119892(119905)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 3
In order to obtain the inverse Laplace transform of func-tion 119906(119910 119902) we consider the auxiliary functions
1198651(119910 119902) =
119887 exp (minus119886radic119902)119887 + radic119902
119908 (119902) =
1205821199022+ 119902
120582119903119902 + 1
(11)
Seeing that 119865(119910 119902) = 1198651[119910 119908(119902)] we have
119891 (119910 119905) = 119871minus1
119865 (119910 119902) = int
infin
0
1198911(119910 119909) ℎ (119909 119905) 119889119909 (12)
where
1198911(119910 119905) = 119871
minus1
1198651(119910 119902)
=
119890minus1199102Re4119905
120573radicRe120587119905
minus
1
1205732Re
119890119910120573+119905120573
2ReErfc(119910radicRe2radic119905
+
1
120573
radic119905
Re)
(13)
and ℎ(119909 119905) = 119871minus1exp(minus119909119908(119902)) is given by
ℎ (119909 119905) = exp (120574119909) 120575 (119905 minus 120582119909
120582119903
) minus radic
120574119909
120582119903119905 minus 120582119909
sdot 1198691(
2
120582119903
radic120574119909 (120582119903119905 minus 120582119909))
sdot exp((2120582 minus 120582
119903) 119909 minus 120582
119903119905
120582119903
2)
(14)
with 120574 = (120582 minus 120582119903)120582119903
2Now introducing 119891
1(119910 119905) and ℎ(119909 119905) into (12) we obtain
119891 (119910 119905) =
119887radic120582119903
radic120582120587119905
exp(minus120582Re1199102
4120582119903119905
+
120574120582119903
120582
119905) minus
1205821199031198872
120582
sdot exp(119910119887radicRe +1198872+ 120574
120582
120582119903119905)Erfc(
119910radic120582Re2radic120582119903119905
+ 119887radic120582119903119905
120582
) + int
infin
0
[
119887
radic120587119909
sdot exp(minus1199102Re4119909
+
(2120582 minus 120582119903) 119909 minus 120582
119903119905
120582119903
2)
minus 1198872exp(119910119887radicRe + 1198872119909 +
(2120582 minus 120582119903) 119909 minus 120582
119903119905
120582119903
2)
sdot Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)] times radic
120574119909
120582119903119905 minus 120582119909
sdot 1198691(
2
120582119903
sdot radic120574119909 (120582119903119905 minus 120582119909)) 119889119909
(15)
and the velocity field corresponding to the flow with slip atthe wall of an Oldroyd-B fluid is given by
119906119904(119910 119905) = (119891 lowast 119892) (119905) = int
119905
0
119891 (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904 (16)
where 119891(119910 119905) is given by (15)
32 Oldroyd-B Fluid with No Slip at the Wall In this particu-lar case function 119865(119910 119902) given by (10) becomes
119865ns (119910 119902) = exp(minus119910radicReradic1205821199022+ 119902
120582119903119902 + 1
) (17)
By using the auxiliary functions
1198651ns (119910 119902) = exp (minus119910radicRe 119902)
1198911ns (119910 119905) =
119910radicRe2119905radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
)
(18)
together with the relation
119891ns (119910 119905) = 119871minus1
119865ns (119910 119902) = int
infin
0
1198911ns (119910 119909)
sdot ℎ (119909 119905) 119889119909 =
119910radicRe 1205822radic120587120582
119903
119905minus32exp(
120574120582119903
120582
119905
minus
1199102Re 1205824120582119903119905
) minus
119910radicRe 1205742radic120587
sdot int
infin
0
119890minus1199102Re4119909+((2120582minus120582
119903)119909minus120582119903119905)120582119903
2
sdot
1
119909radic120582119903119905 minus 120582119909
1198691(
2
120582119903
radic120574119909 (120582119903119905 minus 120582119909)) 119889119909
(19)
The velocity field corresponding to the flow with no-slipconditions of the Oldroyd-B fluid is given by
119906ns (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119891ns (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904 =2
radic120587
sdot int
infin
119910radicRe1205822radic120582119903119905
119890minus1199112+120574Re119910241199112
119892(119905 minus
120582Re1199102
41205821199031199112)119889119911
minus
119910radicRe 1205742radic120587
sdot int
infin
0
int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
119890minus1199102Re4119909+((2120582minus120582
119903)119909minus120582119903119904)120582119903
2
119909radic120582119903119904 minus 120582119909
times 1198691(
2
120582119903
radic120574119909 (120582119903119904 minus 120582119909)) 119889119904 119889119909
(20)
4 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It is important to point out that the solution given by (20)is similar to that obtained recently by Fetecau et al [20 Eq(428)]
33 Maxwell Fluid with Slip Condition For the flows of Max-well fluids with slip condition at the wall (10) becomes
119865sM (119910 119902)
=
(119887radic2) exp(minus119910radic120582Reradic(119902 + 12120582)2 minus (12120582)2)
119887radic2 + radic(119902 + 12120582)2
minus (12120582)2
= 1198871exp
(minus119910radic120582Reradic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1)
1198871
+ radic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1= 1198651(119910radic119908
1(119902))
(21)
where 1198651(sdot sdot) is given by (11) and 119908
1(119902) = (119902 + 119886
1)2
minus 1198862
1 1198871=
119887radic120582 and 1198861= 12120582
The inverse Laplace transform of function (21) is
119891sm (119910 119905) = [1198911(119910 119905)
+ 1198861int
119905
0
1198911(1199101
radic1199052minus 1199062) 1198681(119886 119906) 119889119906] 119890
minus1198861119905
sdot
1198871119890minus1199102Re1205824119905minus119886
1119905
radic120587119905
minus 1198872
11198901199101198871radicRe120582+1198872
1119905minus1198861119905Erfc(
119910radicRe 1205822radic119905
+ 119887radic119905)
+ 1198861119890minus1198861119905
int
119905
0
[
1198871119890minus1199102Re1205824119911minus119886
1119911
radic120587119911
minus 1198872
11198901199101198871radicRe120582+1198872
1minus1198861119911Erfc(
119910radicRe 1205822radic119911
+ 1198871radic119911)]
sdot
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911
(22)
and the velocity field is given by
119906sM (119910 119905) = (119891 lowast 119892) (119905) = int
119905
0
119891SM (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904 (23)
34 Maxwell Fluid with No Slip at the Wall Making 120573 rarr 0
and therefore 119887 rarr 0 into (21) or 120582119903rarr 0 into (17) we have
119865nsM (119910 119902) = exp(minus119910radicReradic1205821199022 + 119902)
= exp(minus119910radicRe 120582radic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1)
(24)
Using the formula
119871minus1
119890minus119910radicRe120582radic119902
= ℎ1(119910 119905) =
119910radicRe 120582119890minus1199102Re1205824119905
2119905radic120587119905
(25)
we obtain
119891nsM (119910 119905) = [ℎ1(119910 119905)
+ 1198861int
119905
0
ℎ1(119910 119911)
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911]
sdot 119890minus1198861119905
=
119910radicRe 1205822119905radic120587119905
119890minus1199102Re1205824119905minus119886
1119905
+ 1198861119890minus1198861119905
int
119905
0
119910radicRe 1205822119911radic120587119911
119890minus1199102Re1205824119911
sdot
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911
(26)
and the velocity field
119906nsM (119910 119905) = (119891 lowast 119892) (119905) = int
119905
0
119891nsM (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904
=
2
radic120587
int
infin
119910radicRe1205822radic119905119890minus1199112minus1198861120582Re119910241199112
119892(119905
minus
120582Re1199102
41199112)119889119911 + 119886
1int
119905
0
int
119904
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
sdot
119910radicRe 1205822119911radic120587119911
119890minus1199102Re1205824119911minus119886
1119904
sdot
119911
radic1199042minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199042minus 1199112) 119889119904 119889119911
(27)
35 Second-Grade Fluid with Slip at the Wall Making 120582 rarr 0
into (10) and (14) and using the results
1198721=
119887
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903119889119909
radic119909
=
119887
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890(minus1199102Re120582
119903)41199112minus1199112
2radic120582119903119889119911
= 119887radic120582119903
2
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890minus1199112minus(119910radicRe120582
119903)241199112
119889119911
= 119887radic120582119903
2
radic120587
sdot
radic120587
2
119890minus1sdot119910radicReradic120582
119903= 119887radic120582
119903119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903
(28)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 5
we obtain the velocity field of the second-grade fluid with slipat the wall in the equivalent forms
119906sSG (119910 119905) = 119887radic120582119903119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903119892 (119905) minus 119887
2
119890119887119910radicRe
119892 (119905)
sdot int
infin
0
1198901198872119909minus119909120582
119903Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)119889119909 +
1
120582119903
sdot int
infin
0
[
119887119890minus1199102Re4119909
radic120587119909
minus 1198872
119890119910119887radicRe+1198872119909Erfc(
119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)]
sdot 119890(minus119909+119905)120582
119903radic
119909
119905
1198681(
2
120582119903
radic119909119905)119889119909
(29)
or
119906sSG (119910 119905) = 119887 (1198872radic120582119903minus 119887 + radic120582
119903) 119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903119892 (119905)
+
119890minus119905120582119903
radic120582119903119905
119892 (119905) times int
infin
0
[
119887119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903
radic120587119909
minus 1198872
119890119887119910radicRe+1198872119909minus119909120582
119903Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)]
sdot radic1199091198681(
2
radic120582119903
radic119909119905)119889119909
(30)
36 Second-Grade FluidwithNo-SlipCondition Making120582 rarr0 into (17) and using (18) and (28) we have
119906nsSG (119910 119905) = 119890minus119910radicRe120582
119903119892 (119905) +
119910radicRe2120582119903radic120587
sdot int
infin
0
int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
119909radic119904
119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903minus1199041205821199031198681(
2
120582119903
sdot radic119909119904) 119889119904 119889119909
(31)
37 Newtonian Fluid withwithout Slip Condition Thesecases are obtained easily from (6) and (10) by making 120582 =
120582119903= 0 We obtain the following expressions for the velocity
field
119906sN (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 120591) VsN (119910 120591) 119889120591
119906nsN (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 120591) VnsN (119910 120591) 119889120591
(32)
where
VsN (119910 119905) =1
120573radicRe1
radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
) minus (
1
120573radicRe)
2
sdot exp(119910
120573
+
119905
1205732Re
)
sdot erfc(119910radicRe2radic119905
+
radic119905
120573radicRe)
(33)
for flows with slip on the boundary and
VnsN (119910 119905) =119910radicRe2119905radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
) (34)
for flows with no slip on the boundary respectivelyWemention that the results given by (33) and (34) are the
same as those obtained by Fetecau et al (see [21] Eq (29) for119872 = 0 120574 replaced by 120573radicRe and 119910 replaced by 119910radicRe)
Also if in our results we consider 119892(119905) = sin(120596119905) or 119892(119905) =cos(120596119905) (32)ndash(34) become equivalent to the results of Khaledand Vafai (see [22] Eqs (8) (9) (10) (16)) and to the resultsobtained by Hayat et al (see [23] Eqs (13) (14) with119872 = 0
and119870 rarrinfin)In the case of no slip on the boundary our solution (32)
together with (34) is identical with the result obtained byFetecau et al (see [24] Eq (31) with119870eff = 0)
4 Numerical Results and Conclusions
In this paper we have studied the flow of Oldroyd-B fluidsgenerated by a moving flat plate Using Laplace transformmethod we obtained analytical expressions of the velocityfor both cases of flows with slip at the boundary and withoutslip on the boundary The plate velocity was considered in ageneral form119880
0119891(119905) therefore solutions for several practical
problems can be obtained by choosing suitable forms of thefunction 119891(119905) From the dimensionless form of the studiedproblem it can be seen that only Reynolds number andnondimensional relaxation and retardation time influencethe fluid flows From this reason the numerical studies aremade for several values of Reynolds number and of the time119905 Graphs of velocity were plotted versus spatial coordinate 119910for the case of translation of the plate with constant velocitynamely for119891(119905) = 1 Velocity fields corresponding to flows ofMaxwell fluid second-grade fluid and Newtonian fluid werealso determined in both cases namely flows with slip on theboundary and flows with no slip on the boundary In orderto study the physical behavior of the fluid some numericalsimulations were made using the Mathcad software In Fig-ures 1 and 2 curves corresponding to velocity of the Oldroyd-B fluid for 120582 = 025 and 120582
119903= 015 and the dimensionless
friction coefficient 120573 = 075 are sketched In Figures 1 and2 the velocity curves for three values of time 119905 and for threevalues of Reynolds number Re in the case of flow with slip atthe plate and in the case of no slip at the plate are plotted
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
08
06
04
02
0
Velo
city
1
08
06
04
02
0
t = 5
t = 3
t = 15
minus02
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
u(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Figure 1 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different Reynolds number
For a fixed value of the time 119905 or for a fixed value of theReynolds number the issues whichmust be highlighted are asfollows
The fluid flows more slowly if slippage occurs on theboundary Increasing of the Reynolds number values leads
to slowing of the flows in both cases with or without slip Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then it increases thethickness of the velocity boundary layer
Figure 3 was drawn in order to compare the velocityflows for Oldroyd-B Maxwell and Newtonian fluids It is
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
1
08
06
04
02
0
0
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
Re = 05
Re = 25
Re = 10
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t = 20 slipt = 50 slip
t = 05 slip
minus02
08
06
04
02
minus02
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
Figure 2 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different values of the time 119905
important to note that for the flow with no slip on theboundary the velocity of Maxwell fluid has significant varia-tions in the area near plateThis no longer occurs if the flow iswith slip at the boundary Also the thickness of the boundary
layer of the Maxwell fluid is the smallest and the speed of thistype of fluid becomes zero more quickly than other fluids Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then the differencesbetween velocities of the three fluids become insignificant
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
t = 05
t = 075
t = 155
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Figure 3 Comparison between velocity profiles of three fluid models with slip condition with 120573 = 055 and no-slip condition for Re = 065120582 = 055 and 120582
119903= 035
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
References
[1] K R Rajagopal and A R Srinivasa ldquoA thermodynamic framework for rate type fluid modelsrdquo Journal of Non-NewtonianFluid Mechanics vol 88 no 3 pp 207ndash227 2000
[2] R I Tanner ldquoNote on the Rayleigh problem for a visco-elasticfluidrdquo Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik vol13 no 6 pp 573ndash580 1962
[3] K R Rajagopal and R K Bhatnagar ldquoExact solutions for somesimple flows of an Oldroyd-B fluidrdquo Acta Mechanica vol 113no 1 pp 233ndash239 1995
[4] N D Waters and M J King ldquoUnsteady flow of an elastico-viscous liquidrdquo Rheologica Acta vol 9 no 3 pp 345ndash355 1970
[5] P Puri and P K Kythe ldquoStokes first and second problems forRivlin-Ericksen fluids with neoclassical heat conditionrdquo ASMEJournal of Heat Transfer vol 120 pp 44ndash50 1996
[6] P M Jordan and A Puri ldquoRevisiting Stokesrsquo first problem forMaxwell fluidsrdquoTheQuarterly Journal ofMechanics and AppliedMathematics vol 58 no 2 pp 213ndash227 2005
[7] C Fetecau D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoA note on the secondproblem of Stokes for Newtonian fluidsrdquo International Journalof Non-Linear Mechanics vol 43 no 5 pp 451ndash457 2008
[8] R I Tanner ldquoPartial wall slip in polymer flowrdquo Industrial andEngineering Chemistry Research vol 33 no 10 pp 2434ndash24361994
[9] M Navier ldquoMemoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluidsrdquoMemoires de lrsquoAcademie des Sciences de LrsquoInstitut de France vol6 pp 389ndash440 1823
[10] I J Rao and K R Rajagopal ldquoThe effect of the slip boundarycondition on the flow of fluids in a channelrdquo Acta Mechanicavol 135 no 3-4 pp 113ndash126 1999
[11] M Mooney ldquoExplicit formulas for slip and fluidityrdquo Journal ofRheology vol 2 no 2 pp 210ndash222 1931
[12] K B Migler H Hervet and L Leger ldquoSlip transition of a pol-ymer melt under shear stressrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 70no 3 pp 287ndash290 1993
[13] S Das S K Guchhait and R N Jana ldquoHall effects on unsteadyhydromagnetic flow past an accelerated porous plate in arotating systemrdquo Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics vol 8 no3 pp 409ndash417 2015
[14] A S Chethan G N Sekhar and P G Siddheshwar ldquoFlow andheat transfer of an exponential stretching sheet in a viscoelasticliquid with navier slip boundary conditionrdquo Journal of AppliedFluid Mechanics vol 8 no 2 pp 223ndash229 2015
[15] M Khan R Malik and A Anjum ldquoExact solutions of MHDsecond Stokes flow of generalized Burgers fluidrdquo Applied Math-ematics and Mechanics vol 36 no 2 pp 211ndash224 2015
[16] I Khan F Ali and S Shafie ldquoStokesrsquo second problem for mag-netohydrodynamics flow in a Burgersrsquo fluid the cases 120574 = 120582
2
4
and 120574 gt 1205822
4rdquo PLoS ONE vol 8 no 5 Article ID e61531 2013[17] A M Siddiqui T Haroon M Zahid and A Shahzad ldquoEffect of
slip condition on unsteady flows of an oldroyd-B fluid betweenparallel platesrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 13 no 11 pp2282ndash2287 2011
[18] DVieru andAA Zafar ldquoSomeCouette flows of aMaxwell fluidwith wall slip conditionrdquo Applied Mathematics amp InformationSciences vol 7 no 1 pp 209ndash219 2013
[19] D Vieru and A Rauf ldquoStokes flows of a Maxwell fluid with wallslip conditionrdquo Canadian Journal of Physics vol 89 no 10 pp1061ndash1071 2011
[20] C Fetecau N Nigar D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoFirst generalsolution for unidirectional motions of rate type fluids over aninfinite platerdquoCommunications inNumerical Analysis vol 2 pp125ndash138 2015
[21] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and I Pop ldquoSlip effects on theunsteady radiative MHD free convection flow over a movingplate with mass diffusion and heat sourcerdquoThe European Phys-ical Journal Plus vol 130 article 6 2015
[22] A-R A Khaled and K Vafai ldquoThe effect of the slip conditionon Stokes and Couette flows due to an oscillating wall exactsolutionsrdquo International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics vol39 no 5 pp 795ndash809 2004
[23] T Hayat M F Afzaal C Fetecau and A A Hendi ldquoSlip effectson the oscillatory flow in a porous mediumrdquo Journal of PorousMedia vol 14 no 6 pp 481ndash493 2011
[24] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and S Akhter ldquoGeneral solu-tions for magnetohydrodynamic natural convection flow withradiative heat transfer and slip condition over a moving platerdquoZeitschrift fur Naturforschung A vol 68 pp 659ndash667 2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Advances in Mathematical Physics 3
In order to obtain the inverse Laplace transform of func-tion 119906(119910 119902) we consider the auxiliary functions
1198651(119910 119902) =
119887 exp (minus119886radic119902)119887 + radic119902
119908 (119902) =
1205821199022+ 119902
120582119903119902 + 1
(11)
Seeing that 119865(119910 119902) = 1198651[119910 119908(119902)] we have
119891 (119910 119905) = 119871minus1
119865 (119910 119902) = int
infin
0
1198911(119910 119909) ℎ (119909 119905) 119889119909 (12)
where
1198911(119910 119905) = 119871
minus1
1198651(119910 119902)
=
119890minus1199102Re4119905
120573radicRe120587119905
minus
1
1205732Re
119890119910120573+119905120573
2ReErfc(119910radicRe2radic119905
+
1
120573
radic119905
Re)
(13)
and ℎ(119909 119905) = 119871minus1exp(minus119909119908(119902)) is given by
ℎ (119909 119905) = exp (120574119909) 120575 (119905 minus 120582119909
120582119903
) minus radic
120574119909
120582119903119905 minus 120582119909
sdot 1198691(
2
120582119903
radic120574119909 (120582119903119905 minus 120582119909))
sdot exp((2120582 minus 120582
119903) 119909 minus 120582
119903119905
120582119903
2)
(14)
with 120574 = (120582 minus 120582119903)120582119903
2Now introducing 119891
1(119910 119905) and ℎ(119909 119905) into (12) we obtain
119891 (119910 119905) =
119887radic120582119903
radic120582120587119905
exp(minus120582Re1199102
4120582119903119905
+
120574120582119903
120582
119905) minus
1205821199031198872
120582
sdot exp(119910119887radicRe +1198872+ 120574
120582
120582119903119905)Erfc(
119910radic120582Re2radic120582119903119905
+ 119887radic120582119903119905
120582
) + int
infin
0
[
119887
radic120587119909
sdot exp(minus1199102Re4119909
+
(2120582 minus 120582119903) 119909 minus 120582
119903119905
120582119903
2)
minus 1198872exp(119910119887radicRe + 1198872119909 +
(2120582 minus 120582119903) 119909 minus 120582
119903119905
120582119903
2)
sdot Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)] times radic
120574119909
120582119903119905 minus 120582119909
sdot 1198691(
2
120582119903
sdot radic120574119909 (120582119903119905 minus 120582119909)) 119889119909
(15)
and the velocity field corresponding to the flow with slip atthe wall of an Oldroyd-B fluid is given by
119906119904(119910 119905) = (119891 lowast 119892) (119905) = int
119905
0
119891 (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904 (16)
where 119891(119910 119905) is given by (15)
32 Oldroyd-B Fluid with No Slip at the Wall In this particu-lar case function 119865(119910 119902) given by (10) becomes
119865ns (119910 119902) = exp(minus119910radicReradic1205821199022+ 119902
120582119903119902 + 1
) (17)
By using the auxiliary functions
1198651ns (119910 119902) = exp (minus119910radicRe 119902)
1198911ns (119910 119905) =
119910radicRe2119905radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
)
(18)
together with the relation
119891ns (119910 119905) = 119871minus1
119865ns (119910 119902) = int
infin
0
1198911ns (119910 119909)
sdot ℎ (119909 119905) 119889119909 =
119910radicRe 1205822radic120587120582
119903
119905minus32exp(
120574120582119903
120582
119905
minus
1199102Re 1205824120582119903119905
) minus
119910radicRe 1205742radic120587
sdot int
infin
0
119890minus1199102Re4119909+((2120582minus120582
119903)119909minus120582119903119905)120582119903
2
sdot
1
119909radic120582119903119905 minus 120582119909
1198691(
2
120582119903
radic120574119909 (120582119903119905 minus 120582119909)) 119889119909
(19)
The velocity field corresponding to the flow with no-slipconditions of the Oldroyd-B fluid is given by
119906ns (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119891ns (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904 =2
radic120587
sdot int
infin
119910radicRe1205822radic120582119903119905
119890minus1199112+120574Re119910241199112
119892(119905 minus
120582Re1199102
41205821199031199112)119889119911
minus
119910radicRe 1205742radic120587
sdot int
infin
0
int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
119890minus1199102Re4119909+((2120582minus120582
119903)119909minus120582119903119904)120582119903
2
119909radic120582119903119904 minus 120582119909
times 1198691(
2
120582119903
radic120574119909 (120582119903119904 minus 120582119909)) 119889119904 119889119909
(20)
4 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It is important to point out that the solution given by (20)is similar to that obtained recently by Fetecau et al [20 Eq(428)]
33 Maxwell Fluid with Slip Condition For the flows of Max-well fluids with slip condition at the wall (10) becomes
119865sM (119910 119902)
=
(119887radic2) exp(minus119910radic120582Reradic(119902 + 12120582)2 minus (12120582)2)
119887radic2 + radic(119902 + 12120582)2
minus (12120582)2
= 1198871exp
(minus119910radic120582Reradic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1)
1198871
+ radic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1= 1198651(119910radic119908
1(119902))
(21)
where 1198651(sdot sdot) is given by (11) and 119908
1(119902) = (119902 + 119886
1)2
minus 1198862
1 1198871=
119887radic120582 and 1198861= 12120582
The inverse Laplace transform of function (21) is
119891sm (119910 119905) = [1198911(119910 119905)
+ 1198861int
119905
0
1198911(1199101
radic1199052minus 1199062) 1198681(119886 119906) 119889119906] 119890
minus1198861119905
sdot
1198871119890minus1199102Re1205824119905minus119886
1119905
radic120587119905
minus 1198872
11198901199101198871radicRe120582+1198872
1119905minus1198861119905Erfc(
119910radicRe 1205822radic119905
+ 119887radic119905)
+ 1198861119890minus1198861119905
int
119905
0
[
1198871119890minus1199102Re1205824119911minus119886
1119911
radic120587119911
minus 1198872
11198901199101198871radicRe120582+1198872
1minus1198861119911Erfc(
119910radicRe 1205822radic119911
+ 1198871radic119911)]
sdot
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911
(22)
and the velocity field is given by
119906sM (119910 119905) = (119891 lowast 119892) (119905) = int
119905
0
119891SM (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904 (23)
34 Maxwell Fluid with No Slip at the Wall Making 120573 rarr 0
and therefore 119887 rarr 0 into (21) or 120582119903rarr 0 into (17) we have
119865nsM (119910 119902) = exp(minus119910radicReradic1205821199022 + 119902)
= exp(minus119910radicRe 120582radic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1)
(24)
Using the formula
119871minus1
119890minus119910radicRe120582radic119902
= ℎ1(119910 119905) =
119910radicRe 120582119890minus1199102Re1205824119905
2119905radic120587119905
(25)
we obtain
119891nsM (119910 119905) = [ℎ1(119910 119905)
+ 1198861int
119905
0
ℎ1(119910 119911)
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911]
sdot 119890minus1198861119905
=
119910radicRe 1205822119905radic120587119905
119890minus1199102Re1205824119905minus119886
1119905
+ 1198861119890minus1198861119905
int
119905
0
119910radicRe 1205822119911radic120587119911
119890minus1199102Re1205824119911
sdot
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911
(26)
and the velocity field
119906nsM (119910 119905) = (119891 lowast 119892) (119905) = int
119905
0
119891nsM (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904
=
2
radic120587
int
infin
119910radicRe1205822radic119905119890minus1199112minus1198861120582Re119910241199112
119892(119905
minus
120582Re1199102
41199112)119889119911 + 119886
1int
119905
0
int
119904
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
sdot
119910radicRe 1205822119911radic120587119911
119890minus1199102Re1205824119911minus119886
1119904
sdot
119911
radic1199042minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199042minus 1199112) 119889119904 119889119911
(27)
35 Second-Grade Fluid with Slip at the Wall Making 120582 rarr 0
into (10) and (14) and using the results
1198721=
119887
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903119889119909
radic119909
=
119887
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890(minus1199102Re120582
119903)41199112minus1199112
2radic120582119903119889119911
= 119887radic120582119903
2
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890minus1199112minus(119910radicRe120582
119903)241199112
119889119911
= 119887radic120582119903
2
radic120587
sdot
radic120587
2
119890minus1sdot119910radicReradic120582
119903= 119887radic120582
119903119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903
(28)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 5
we obtain the velocity field of the second-grade fluid with slipat the wall in the equivalent forms
119906sSG (119910 119905) = 119887radic120582119903119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903119892 (119905) minus 119887
2
119890119887119910radicRe
119892 (119905)
sdot int
infin
0
1198901198872119909minus119909120582
119903Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)119889119909 +
1
120582119903
sdot int
infin
0
[
119887119890minus1199102Re4119909
radic120587119909
minus 1198872
119890119910119887radicRe+1198872119909Erfc(
119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)]
sdot 119890(minus119909+119905)120582
119903radic
119909
119905
1198681(
2
120582119903
radic119909119905)119889119909
(29)
or
119906sSG (119910 119905) = 119887 (1198872radic120582119903minus 119887 + radic120582
119903) 119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903119892 (119905)
+
119890minus119905120582119903
radic120582119903119905
119892 (119905) times int
infin
0
[
119887119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903
radic120587119909
minus 1198872
119890119887119910radicRe+1198872119909minus119909120582
119903Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)]
sdot radic1199091198681(
2
radic120582119903
radic119909119905)119889119909
(30)
36 Second-Grade FluidwithNo-SlipCondition Making120582 rarr0 into (17) and using (18) and (28) we have
119906nsSG (119910 119905) = 119890minus119910radicRe120582
119903119892 (119905) +
119910radicRe2120582119903radic120587
sdot int
infin
0
int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
119909radic119904
119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903minus1199041205821199031198681(
2
120582119903
sdot radic119909119904) 119889119904 119889119909
(31)
37 Newtonian Fluid withwithout Slip Condition Thesecases are obtained easily from (6) and (10) by making 120582 =
120582119903= 0 We obtain the following expressions for the velocity
field
119906sN (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 120591) VsN (119910 120591) 119889120591
119906nsN (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 120591) VnsN (119910 120591) 119889120591
(32)
where
VsN (119910 119905) =1
120573radicRe1
radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
) minus (
1
120573radicRe)
2
sdot exp(119910
120573
+
119905
1205732Re
)
sdot erfc(119910radicRe2radic119905
+
radic119905
120573radicRe)
(33)
for flows with slip on the boundary and
VnsN (119910 119905) =119910radicRe2119905radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
) (34)
for flows with no slip on the boundary respectivelyWemention that the results given by (33) and (34) are the
same as those obtained by Fetecau et al (see [21] Eq (29) for119872 = 0 120574 replaced by 120573radicRe and 119910 replaced by 119910radicRe)
Also if in our results we consider 119892(119905) = sin(120596119905) or 119892(119905) =cos(120596119905) (32)ndash(34) become equivalent to the results of Khaledand Vafai (see [22] Eqs (8) (9) (10) (16)) and to the resultsobtained by Hayat et al (see [23] Eqs (13) (14) with119872 = 0
and119870 rarrinfin)In the case of no slip on the boundary our solution (32)
together with (34) is identical with the result obtained byFetecau et al (see [24] Eq (31) with119870eff = 0)
4 Numerical Results and Conclusions
In this paper we have studied the flow of Oldroyd-B fluidsgenerated by a moving flat plate Using Laplace transformmethod we obtained analytical expressions of the velocityfor both cases of flows with slip at the boundary and withoutslip on the boundary The plate velocity was considered in ageneral form119880
0119891(119905) therefore solutions for several practical
problems can be obtained by choosing suitable forms of thefunction 119891(119905) From the dimensionless form of the studiedproblem it can be seen that only Reynolds number andnondimensional relaxation and retardation time influencethe fluid flows From this reason the numerical studies aremade for several values of Reynolds number and of the time119905 Graphs of velocity were plotted versus spatial coordinate 119910for the case of translation of the plate with constant velocitynamely for119891(119905) = 1 Velocity fields corresponding to flows ofMaxwell fluid second-grade fluid and Newtonian fluid werealso determined in both cases namely flows with slip on theboundary and flows with no slip on the boundary In orderto study the physical behavior of the fluid some numericalsimulations were made using the Mathcad software In Fig-ures 1 and 2 curves corresponding to velocity of the Oldroyd-B fluid for 120582 = 025 and 120582
119903= 015 and the dimensionless
friction coefficient 120573 = 075 are sketched In Figures 1 and2 the velocity curves for three values of time 119905 and for threevalues of Reynolds number Re in the case of flow with slip atthe plate and in the case of no slip at the plate are plotted
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
08
06
04
02
0
Velo
city
1
08
06
04
02
0
t = 5
t = 3
t = 15
minus02
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
u(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Figure 1 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different Reynolds number
For a fixed value of the time 119905 or for a fixed value of theReynolds number the issues whichmust be highlighted are asfollows
The fluid flows more slowly if slippage occurs on theboundary Increasing of the Reynolds number values leads
to slowing of the flows in both cases with or without slip Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then it increases thethickness of the velocity boundary layer
Figure 3 was drawn in order to compare the velocityflows for Oldroyd-B Maxwell and Newtonian fluids It is
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
1
08
06
04
02
0
0
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
Re = 05
Re = 25
Re = 10
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t = 20 slipt = 50 slip
t = 05 slip
minus02
08
06
04
02
minus02
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
Figure 2 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different values of the time 119905
important to note that for the flow with no slip on theboundary the velocity of Maxwell fluid has significant varia-tions in the area near plateThis no longer occurs if the flow iswith slip at the boundary Also the thickness of the boundary
layer of the Maxwell fluid is the smallest and the speed of thistype of fluid becomes zero more quickly than other fluids Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then the differencesbetween velocities of the three fluids become insignificant
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
t = 05
t = 075
t = 155
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Figure 3 Comparison between velocity profiles of three fluid models with slip condition with 120573 = 055 and no-slip condition for Re = 065120582 = 055 and 120582
119903= 035
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
References
[1] K R Rajagopal and A R Srinivasa ldquoA thermodynamic framework for rate type fluid modelsrdquo Journal of Non-NewtonianFluid Mechanics vol 88 no 3 pp 207ndash227 2000
[2] R I Tanner ldquoNote on the Rayleigh problem for a visco-elasticfluidrdquo Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik vol13 no 6 pp 573ndash580 1962
[3] K R Rajagopal and R K Bhatnagar ldquoExact solutions for somesimple flows of an Oldroyd-B fluidrdquo Acta Mechanica vol 113no 1 pp 233ndash239 1995
[4] N D Waters and M J King ldquoUnsteady flow of an elastico-viscous liquidrdquo Rheologica Acta vol 9 no 3 pp 345ndash355 1970
[5] P Puri and P K Kythe ldquoStokes first and second problems forRivlin-Ericksen fluids with neoclassical heat conditionrdquo ASMEJournal of Heat Transfer vol 120 pp 44ndash50 1996
[6] P M Jordan and A Puri ldquoRevisiting Stokesrsquo first problem forMaxwell fluidsrdquoTheQuarterly Journal ofMechanics and AppliedMathematics vol 58 no 2 pp 213ndash227 2005
[7] C Fetecau D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoA note on the secondproblem of Stokes for Newtonian fluidsrdquo International Journalof Non-Linear Mechanics vol 43 no 5 pp 451ndash457 2008
[8] R I Tanner ldquoPartial wall slip in polymer flowrdquo Industrial andEngineering Chemistry Research vol 33 no 10 pp 2434ndash24361994
[9] M Navier ldquoMemoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluidsrdquoMemoires de lrsquoAcademie des Sciences de LrsquoInstitut de France vol6 pp 389ndash440 1823
[10] I J Rao and K R Rajagopal ldquoThe effect of the slip boundarycondition on the flow of fluids in a channelrdquo Acta Mechanicavol 135 no 3-4 pp 113ndash126 1999
[11] M Mooney ldquoExplicit formulas for slip and fluidityrdquo Journal ofRheology vol 2 no 2 pp 210ndash222 1931
[12] K B Migler H Hervet and L Leger ldquoSlip transition of a pol-ymer melt under shear stressrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 70no 3 pp 287ndash290 1993
[13] S Das S K Guchhait and R N Jana ldquoHall effects on unsteadyhydromagnetic flow past an accelerated porous plate in arotating systemrdquo Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics vol 8 no3 pp 409ndash417 2015
[14] A S Chethan G N Sekhar and P G Siddheshwar ldquoFlow andheat transfer of an exponential stretching sheet in a viscoelasticliquid with navier slip boundary conditionrdquo Journal of AppliedFluid Mechanics vol 8 no 2 pp 223ndash229 2015
[15] M Khan R Malik and A Anjum ldquoExact solutions of MHDsecond Stokes flow of generalized Burgers fluidrdquo Applied Math-ematics and Mechanics vol 36 no 2 pp 211ndash224 2015
[16] I Khan F Ali and S Shafie ldquoStokesrsquo second problem for mag-netohydrodynamics flow in a Burgersrsquo fluid the cases 120574 = 120582
2
4
and 120574 gt 1205822
4rdquo PLoS ONE vol 8 no 5 Article ID e61531 2013[17] A M Siddiqui T Haroon M Zahid and A Shahzad ldquoEffect of
slip condition on unsteady flows of an oldroyd-B fluid betweenparallel platesrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 13 no 11 pp2282ndash2287 2011
[18] DVieru andAA Zafar ldquoSomeCouette flows of aMaxwell fluidwith wall slip conditionrdquo Applied Mathematics amp InformationSciences vol 7 no 1 pp 209ndash219 2013
[19] D Vieru and A Rauf ldquoStokes flows of a Maxwell fluid with wallslip conditionrdquo Canadian Journal of Physics vol 89 no 10 pp1061ndash1071 2011
[20] C Fetecau N Nigar D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoFirst generalsolution for unidirectional motions of rate type fluids over aninfinite platerdquoCommunications inNumerical Analysis vol 2 pp125ndash138 2015
[21] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and I Pop ldquoSlip effects on theunsteady radiative MHD free convection flow over a movingplate with mass diffusion and heat sourcerdquoThe European Phys-ical Journal Plus vol 130 article 6 2015
[22] A-R A Khaled and K Vafai ldquoThe effect of the slip conditionon Stokes and Couette flows due to an oscillating wall exactsolutionsrdquo International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics vol39 no 5 pp 795ndash809 2004
[23] T Hayat M F Afzaal C Fetecau and A A Hendi ldquoSlip effectson the oscillatory flow in a porous mediumrdquo Journal of PorousMedia vol 14 no 6 pp 481ndash493 2011
[24] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and S Akhter ldquoGeneral solu-tions for magnetohydrodynamic natural convection flow withradiative heat transfer and slip condition over a moving platerdquoZeitschrift fur Naturforschung A vol 68 pp 659ndash667 2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
4 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It is important to point out that the solution given by (20)is similar to that obtained recently by Fetecau et al [20 Eq(428)]
33 Maxwell Fluid with Slip Condition For the flows of Max-well fluids with slip condition at the wall (10) becomes
119865sM (119910 119902)
=
(119887radic2) exp(minus119910radic120582Reradic(119902 + 12120582)2 minus (12120582)2)
119887radic2 + radic(119902 + 12120582)2
minus (12120582)2
= 1198871exp
(minus119910radic120582Reradic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1)
1198871
+ radic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1= 1198651(119910radic119908
1(119902))
(21)
where 1198651(sdot sdot) is given by (11) and 119908
1(119902) = (119902 + 119886
1)2
minus 1198862
1 1198871=
119887radic120582 and 1198861= 12120582
The inverse Laplace transform of function (21) is
119891sm (119910 119905) = [1198911(119910 119905)
+ 1198861int
119905
0
1198911(1199101
radic1199052minus 1199062) 1198681(119886 119906) 119889119906] 119890
minus1198861119905
sdot
1198871119890minus1199102Re1205824119905minus119886
1119905
radic120587119905
minus 1198872
11198901199101198871radicRe120582+1198872
1119905minus1198861119905Erfc(
119910radicRe 1205822radic119905
+ 119887radic119905)
+ 1198861119890minus1198861119905
int
119905
0
[
1198871119890minus1199102Re1205824119911minus119886
1119911
radic120587119911
minus 1198872
11198901199101198871radicRe120582+1198872
1minus1198861119911Erfc(
119910radicRe 1205822radic119911
+ 1198871radic119911)]
sdot
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911
(22)
and the velocity field is given by
119906sM (119910 119905) = (119891 lowast 119892) (119905) = int
119905
0
119891SM (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904 (23)
34 Maxwell Fluid with No Slip at the Wall Making 120573 rarr 0
and therefore 119887 rarr 0 into (21) or 120582119903rarr 0 into (17) we have
119865nsM (119910 119902) = exp(minus119910radicReradic1205821199022 + 119902)
= exp(minus119910radicRe 120582radic(119902 + 1198861)2
minus 1198862
1)
(24)
Using the formula
119871minus1
119890minus119910radicRe120582radic119902
= ℎ1(119910 119905) =
119910radicRe 120582119890minus1199102Re1205824119905
2119905radic120587119905
(25)
we obtain
119891nsM (119910 119905) = [ℎ1(119910 119905)
+ 1198861int
119905
0
ℎ1(119910 119911)
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911]
sdot 119890minus1198861119905
=
119910radicRe 1205822119905radic120587119905
119890minus1199102Re1205824119905minus119886
1119905
+ 1198861119890minus1198861119905
int
119905
0
119910radicRe 1205822119911radic120587119911
119890minus1199102Re1205824119911
sdot
119911
radic1199052minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199052minus 1199112) 119889119911
(26)
and the velocity field
119906nsM (119910 119905) = (119891 lowast 119892) (119905) = int
119905
0
119891nsM (119910 119904) 119892 (119905 minus 119904) 119889119904
=
2
radic120587
int
infin
119910radicRe1205822radic119905119890minus1199112minus1198861120582Re119910241199112
119892(119905
minus
120582Re1199102
41199112)119889119911 + 119886
1int
119905
0
int
119904
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
sdot
119910radicRe 1205822119911radic120587119911
119890minus1199102Re1205824119911minus119886
1119904
sdot
119911
radic1199042minus 1199112
1198681(1198861
radic1199042minus 1199112) 119889119904 119889119911
(27)
35 Second-Grade Fluid with Slip at the Wall Making 120582 rarr 0
into (10) and (14) and using the results
1198721=
119887
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903119889119909
radic119909
=
119887
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890(minus1199102Re120582
119903)41199112minus1199112
2radic120582119903119889119911
= 119887radic120582119903
2
radic120587
int
infin
0
119890minus1199112minus(119910radicRe120582
119903)241199112
119889119911
= 119887radic120582119903
2
radic120587
sdot
radic120587
2
119890minus1sdot119910radicReradic120582
119903= 119887radic120582
119903119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903
(28)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 5
we obtain the velocity field of the second-grade fluid with slipat the wall in the equivalent forms
119906sSG (119910 119905) = 119887radic120582119903119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903119892 (119905) minus 119887
2
119890119887119910radicRe
119892 (119905)
sdot int
infin
0
1198901198872119909minus119909120582
119903Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)119889119909 +
1
120582119903
sdot int
infin
0
[
119887119890minus1199102Re4119909
radic120587119909
minus 1198872
119890119910119887radicRe+1198872119909Erfc(
119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)]
sdot 119890(minus119909+119905)120582
119903radic
119909
119905
1198681(
2
120582119903
radic119909119905)119889119909
(29)
or
119906sSG (119910 119905) = 119887 (1198872radic120582119903minus 119887 + radic120582
119903) 119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903119892 (119905)
+
119890minus119905120582119903
radic120582119903119905
119892 (119905) times int
infin
0
[
119887119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903
radic120587119909
minus 1198872
119890119887119910radicRe+1198872119909minus119909120582
119903Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)]
sdot radic1199091198681(
2
radic120582119903
radic119909119905)119889119909
(30)
36 Second-Grade FluidwithNo-SlipCondition Making120582 rarr0 into (17) and using (18) and (28) we have
119906nsSG (119910 119905) = 119890minus119910radicRe120582
119903119892 (119905) +
119910radicRe2120582119903radic120587
sdot int
infin
0
int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
119909radic119904
119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903minus1199041205821199031198681(
2
120582119903
sdot radic119909119904) 119889119904 119889119909
(31)
37 Newtonian Fluid withwithout Slip Condition Thesecases are obtained easily from (6) and (10) by making 120582 =
120582119903= 0 We obtain the following expressions for the velocity
field
119906sN (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 120591) VsN (119910 120591) 119889120591
119906nsN (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 120591) VnsN (119910 120591) 119889120591
(32)
where
VsN (119910 119905) =1
120573radicRe1
radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
) minus (
1
120573radicRe)
2
sdot exp(119910
120573
+
119905
1205732Re
)
sdot erfc(119910radicRe2radic119905
+
radic119905
120573radicRe)
(33)
for flows with slip on the boundary and
VnsN (119910 119905) =119910radicRe2119905radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
) (34)
for flows with no slip on the boundary respectivelyWemention that the results given by (33) and (34) are the
same as those obtained by Fetecau et al (see [21] Eq (29) for119872 = 0 120574 replaced by 120573radicRe and 119910 replaced by 119910radicRe)
Also if in our results we consider 119892(119905) = sin(120596119905) or 119892(119905) =cos(120596119905) (32)ndash(34) become equivalent to the results of Khaledand Vafai (see [22] Eqs (8) (9) (10) (16)) and to the resultsobtained by Hayat et al (see [23] Eqs (13) (14) with119872 = 0
and119870 rarrinfin)In the case of no slip on the boundary our solution (32)
together with (34) is identical with the result obtained byFetecau et al (see [24] Eq (31) with119870eff = 0)
4 Numerical Results and Conclusions
In this paper we have studied the flow of Oldroyd-B fluidsgenerated by a moving flat plate Using Laplace transformmethod we obtained analytical expressions of the velocityfor both cases of flows with slip at the boundary and withoutslip on the boundary The plate velocity was considered in ageneral form119880
0119891(119905) therefore solutions for several practical
problems can be obtained by choosing suitable forms of thefunction 119891(119905) From the dimensionless form of the studiedproblem it can be seen that only Reynolds number andnondimensional relaxation and retardation time influencethe fluid flows From this reason the numerical studies aremade for several values of Reynolds number and of the time119905 Graphs of velocity were plotted versus spatial coordinate 119910for the case of translation of the plate with constant velocitynamely for119891(119905) = 1 Velocity fields corresponding to flows ofMaxwell fluid second-grade fluid and Newtonian fluid werealso determined in both cases namely flows with slip on theboundary and flows with no slip on the boundary In orderto study the physical behavior of the fluid some numericalsimulations were made using the Mathcad software In Fig-ures 1 and 2 curves corresponding to velocity of the Oldroyd-B fluid for 120582 = 025 and 120582
119903= 015 and the dimensionless
friction coefficient 120573 = 075 are sketched In Figures 1 and2 the velocity curves for three values of time 119905 and for threevalues of Reynolds number Re in the case of flow with slip atthe plate and in the case of no slip at the plate are plotted
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
08
06
04
02
0
Velo
city
1
08
06
04
02
0
t = 5
t = 3
t = 15
minus02
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
u(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Figure 1 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different Reynolds number
For a fixed value of the time 119905 or for a fixed value of theReynolds number the issues whichmust be highlighted are asfollows
The fluid flows more slowly if slippage occurs on theboundary Increasing of the Reynolds number values leads
to slowing of the flows in both cases with or without slip Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then it increases thethickness of the velocity boundary layer
Figure 3 was drawn in order to compare the velocityflows for Oldroyd-B Maxwell and Newtonian fluids It is
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
1
08
06
04
02
0
0
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
Re = 05
Re = 25
Re = 10
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t = 20 slipt = 50 slip
t = 05 slip
minus02
08
06
04
02
minus02
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
Figure 2 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different values of the time 119905
important to note that for the flow with no slip on theboundary the velocity of Maxwell fluid has significant varia-tions in the area near plateThis no longer occurs if the flow iswith slip at the boundary Also the thickness of the boundary
layer of the Maxwell fluid is the smallest and the speed of thistype of fluid becomes zero more quickly than other fluids Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then the differencesbetween velocities of the three fluids become insignificant
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
t = 05
t = 075
t = 155
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Figure 3 Comparison between velocity profiles of three fluid models with slip condition with 120573 = 055 and no-slip condition for Re = 065120582 = 055 and 120582
119903= 035
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
References
[1] K R Rajagopal and A R Srinivasa ldquoA thermodynamic framework for rate type fluid modelsrdquo Journal of Non-NewtonianFluid Mechanics vol 88 no 3 pp 207ndash227 2000
[2] R I Tanner ldquoNote on the Rayleigh problem for a visco-elasticfluidrdquo Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik vol13 no 6 pp 573ndash580 1962
[3] K R Rajagopal and R K Bhatnagar ldquoExact solutions for somesimple flows of an Oldroyd-B fluidrdquo Acta Mechanica vol 113no 1 pp 233ndash239 1995
[4] N D Waters and M J King ldquoUnsteady flow of an elastico-viscous liquidrdquo Rheologica Acta vol 9 no 3 pp 345ndash355 1970
[5] P Puri and P K Kythe ldquoStokes first and second problems forRivlin-Ericksen fluids with neoclassical heat conditionrdquo ASMEJournal of Heat Transfer vol 120 pp 44ndash50 1996
[6] P M Jordan and A Puri ldquoRevisiting Stokesrsquo first problem forMaxwell fluidsrdquoTheQuarterly Journal ofMechanics and AppliedMathematics vol 58 no 2 pp 213ndash227 2005
[7] C Fetecau D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoA note on the secondproblem of Stokes for Newtonian fluidsrdquo International Journalof Non-Linear Mechanics vol 43 no 5 pp 451ndash457 2008
[8] R I Tanner ldquoPartial wall slip in polymer flowrdquo Industrial andEngineering Chemistry Research vol 33 no 10 pp 2434ndash24361994
[9] M Navier ldquoMemoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluidsrdquoMemoires de lrsquoAcademie des Sciences de LrsquoInstitut de France vol6 pp 389ndash440 1823
[10] I J Rao and K R Rajagopal ldquoThe effect of the slip boundarycondition on the flow of fluids in a channelrdquo Acta Mechanicavol 135 no 3-4 pp 113ndash126 1999
[11] M Mooney ldquoExplicit formulas for slip and fluidityrdquo Journal ofRheology vol 2 no 2 pp 210ndash222 1931
[12] K B Migler H Hervet and L Leger ldquoSlip transition of a pol-ymer melt under shear stressrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 70no 3 pp 287ndash290 1993
[13] S Das S K Guchhait and R N Jana ldquoHall effects on unsteadyhydromagnetic flow past an accelerated porous plate in arotating systemrdquo Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics vol 8 no3 pp 409ndash417 2015
[14] A S Chethan G N Sekhar and P G Siddheshwar ldquoFlow andheat transfer of an exponential stretching sheet in a viscoelasticliquid with navier slip boundary conditionrdquo Journal of AppliedFluid Mechanics vol 8 no 2 pp 223ndash229 2015
[15] M Khan R Malik and A Anjum ldquoExact solutions of MHDsecond Stokes flow of generalized Burgers fluidrdquo Applied Math-ematics and Mechanics vol 36 no 2 pp 211ndash224 2015
[16] I Khan F Ali and S Shafie ldquoStokesrsquo second problem for mag-netohydrodynamics flow in a Burgersrsquo fluid the cases 120574 = 120582
2
4
and 120574 gt 1205822
4rdquo PLoS ONE vol 8 no 5 Article ID e61531 2013[17] A M Siddiqui T Haroon M Zahid and A Shahzad ldquoEffect of
slip condition on unsteady flows of an oldroyd-B fluid betweenparallel platesrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 13 no 11 pp2282ndash2287 2011
[18] DVieru andAA Zafar ldquoSomeCouette flows of aMaxwell fluidwith wall slip conditionrdquo Applied Mathematics amp InformationSciences vol 7 no 1 pp 209ndash219 2013
[19] D Vieru and A Rauf ldquoStokes flows of a Maxwell fluid with wallslip conditionrdquo Canadian Journal of Physics vol 89 no 10 pp1061ndash1071 2011
[20] C Fetecau N Nigar D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoFirst generalsolution for unidirectional motions of rate type fluids over aninfinite platerdquoCommunications inNumerical Analysis vol 2 pp125ndash138 2015
[21] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and I Pop ldquoSlip effects on theunsteady radiative MHD free convection flow over a movingplate with mass diffusion and heat sourcerdquoThe European Phys-ical Journal Plus vol 130 article 6 2015
[22] A-R A Khaled and K Vafai ldquoThe effect of the slip conditionon Stokes and Couette flows due to an oscillating wall exactsolutionsrdquo International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics vol39 no 5 pp 795ndash809 2004
[23] T Hayat M F Afzaal C Fetecau and A A Hendi ldquoSlip effectson the oscillatory flow in a porous mediumrdquo Journal of PorousMedia vol 14 no 6 pp 481ndash493 2011
[24] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and S Akhter ldquoGeneral solu-tions for magnetohydrodynamic natural convection flow withradiative heat transfer and slip condition over a moving platerdquoZeitschrift fur Naturforschung A vol 68 pp 659ndash667 2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Advances in Mathematical Physics 5
we obtain the velocity field of the second-grade fluid with slipat the wall in the equivalent forms
119906sSG (119910 119905) = 119887radic120582119903119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903119892 (119905) minus 119887
2
119890119887119910radicRe
119892 (119905)
sdot int
infin
0
1198901198872119909minus119909120582
119903Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)119889119909 +
1
120582119903
sdot int
infin
0
[
119887119890minus1199102Re4119909
radic120587119909
minus 1198872
119890119910119887radicRe+1198872119909Erfc(
119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)]
sdot 119890(minus119909+119905)120582
119903radic
119909
119905
1198681(
2
120582119903
radic119909119905)119889119909
(29)
or
119906sSG (119910 119905) = 119887 (1198872radic120582119903minus 119887 + radic120582
119903) 119890minus119910radicReradic120582
119903119892 (119905)
+
119890minus119905120582119903
radic120582119903119905
119892 (119905) times int
infin
0
[
119887119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903
radic120587119909
minus 1198872
119890119887119910radicRe+1198872119909minus119909120582
119903Erfc(119910radicRe2radic119909
+ 119887radic119909)]
sdot radic1199091198681(
2
radic120582119903
radic119909119905)119889119909
(30)
36 Second-Grade FluidwithNo-SlipCondition Making120582 rarr0 into (17) and using (18) and (28) we have
119906nsSG (119910 119905) = 119890minus119910radicRe120582
119903119892 (119905) +
119910radicRe2120582119903radic120587
sdot int
infin
0
int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 119904)
119909radic119904
119890minus1199102Re4119909minus119909120582
119903minus1199041205821199031198681(
2
120582119903
sdot radic119909119904) 119889119904 119889119909
(31)
37 Newtonian Fluid withwithout Slip Condition Thesecases are obtained easily from (6) and (10) by making 120582 =
120582119903= 0 We obtain the following expressions for the velocity
field
119906sN (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 120591) VsN (119910 120591) 119889120591
119906nsN (119910 119905) = int
119905
0
119892 (119905 minus 120591) VnsN (119910 120591) 119889120591
(32)
where
VsN (119910 119905) =1
120573radicRe1
radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
) minus (
1
120573radicRe)
2
sdot exp(119910
120573
+
119905
1205732Re
)
sdot erfc(119910radicRe2radic119905
+
radic119905
120573radicRe)
(33)
for flows with slip on the boundary and
VnsN (119910 119905) =119910radicRe2119905radic120587119905
exp(minus1199102Re4119905
) (34)
for flows with no slip on the boundary respectivelyWemention that the results given by (33) and (34) are the
same as those obtained by Fetecau et al (see [21] Eq (29) for119872 = 0 120574 replaced by 120573radicRe and 119910 replaced by 119910radicRe)
Also if in our results we consider 119892(119905) = sin(120596119905) or 119892(119905) =cos(120596119905) (32)ndash(34) become equivalent to the results of Khaledand Vafai (see [22] Eqs (8) (9) (10) (16)) and to the resultsobtained by Hayat et al (see [23] Eqs (13) (14) with119872 = 0
and119870 rarrinfin)In the case of no slip on the boundary our solution (32)
together with (34) is identical with the result obtained byFetecau et al (see [24] Eq (31) with119870eff = 0)
4 Numerical Results and Conclusions
In this paper we have studied the flow of Oldroyd-B fluidsgenerated by a moving flat plate Using Laplace transformmethod we obtained analytical expressions of the velocityfor both cases of flows with slip at the boundary and withoutslip on the boundary The plate velocity was considered in ageneral form119880
0119891(119905) therefore solutions for several practical
problems can be obtained by choosing suitable forms of thefunction 119891(119905) From the dimensionless form of the studiedproblem it can be seen that only Reynolds number andnondimensional relaxation and retardation time influencethe fluid flows From this reason the numerical studies aremade for several values of Reynolds number and of the time119905 Graphs of velocity were plotted versus spatial coordinate 119910for the case of translation of the plate with constant velocitynamely for119891(119905) = 1 Velocity fields corresponding to flows ofMaxwell fluid second-grade fluid and Newtonian fluid werealso determined in both cases namely flows with slip on theboundary and flows with no slip on the boundary In orderto study the physical behavior of the fluid some numericalsimulations were made using the Mathcad software In Fig-ures 1 and 2 curves corresponding to velocity of the Oldroyd-B fluid for 120582 = 025 and 120582
119903= 015 and the dimensionless
friction coefficient 120573 = 075 are sketched In Figures 1 and2 the velocity curves for three values of time 119905 and for threevalues of Reynolds number Re in the case of flow with slip atthe plate and in the case of no slip at the plate are plotted
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
08
06
04
02
0
Velo
city
1
08
06
04
02
0
t = 5
t = 3
t = 15
minus02
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
u(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Figure 1 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different Reynolds number
For a fixed value of the time 119905 or for a fixed value of theReynolds number the issues whichmust be highlighted are asfollows
The fluid flows more slowly if slippage occurs on theboundary Increasing of the Reynolds number values leads
to slowing of the flows in both cases with or without slip Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then it increases thethickness of the velocity boundary layer
Figure 3 was drawn in order to compare the velocityflows for Oldroyd-B Maxwell and Newtonian fluids It is
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
1
08
06
04
02
0
0
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
Re = 05
Re = 25
Re = 10
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t = 20 slipt = 50 slip
t = 05 slip
minus02
08
06
04
02
minus02
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
Figure 2 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different values of the time 119905
important to note that for the flow with no slip on theboundary the velocity of Maxwell fluid has significant varia-tions in the area near plateThis no longer occurs if the flow iswith slip at the boundary Also the thickness of the boundary
layer of the Maxwell fluid is the smallest and the speed of thistype of fluid becomes zero more quickly than other fluids Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then the differencesbetween velocities of the three fluids become insignificant
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
t = 05
t = 075
t = 155
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Figure 3 Comparison between velocity profiles of three fluid models with slip condition with 120573 = 055 and no-slip condition for Re = 065120582 = 055 and 120582
119903= 035
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
References
[1] K R Rajagopal and A R Srinivasa ldquoA thermodynamic framework for rate type fluid modelsrdquo Journal of Non-NewtonianFluid Mechanics vol 88 no 3 pp 207ndash227 2000
[2] R I Tanner ldquoNote on the Rayleigh problem for a visco-elasticfluidrdquo Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik vol13 no 6 pp 573ndash580 1962
[3] K R Rajagopal and R K Bhatnagar ldquoExact solutions for somesimple flows of an Oldroyd-B fluidrdquo Acta Mechanica vol 113no 1 pp 233ndash239 1995
[4] N D Waters and M J King ldquoUnsteady flow of an elastico-viscous liquidrdquo Rheologica Acta vol 9 no 3 pp 345ndash355 1970
[5] P Puri and P K Kythe ldquoStokes first and second problems forRivlin-Ericksen fluids with neoclassical heat conditionrdquo ASMEJournal of Heat Transfer vol 120 pp 44ndash50 1996
[6] P M Jordan and A Puri ldquoRevisiting Stokesrsquo first problem forMaxwell fluidsrdquoTheQuarterly Journal ofMechanics and AppliedMathematics vol 58 no 2 pp 213ndash227 2005
[7] C Fetecau D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoA note on the secondproblem of Stokes for Newtonian fluidsrdquo International Journalof Non-Linear Mechanics vol 43 no 5 pp 451ndash457 2008
[8] R I Tanner ldquoPartial wall slip in polymer flowrdquo Industrial andEngineering Chemistry Research vol 33 no 10 pp 2434ndash24361994
[9] M Navier ldquoMemoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluidsrdquoMemoires de lrsquoAcademie des Sciences de LrsquoInstitut de France vol6 pp 389ndash440 1823
[10] I J Rao and K R Rajagopal ldquoThe effect of the slip boundarycondition on the flow of fluids in a channelrdquo Acta Mechanicavol 135 no 3-4 pp 113ndash126 1999
[11] M Mooney ldquoExplicit formulas for slip and fluidityrdquo Journal ofRheology vol 2 no 2 pp 210ndash222 1931
[12] K B Migler H Hervet and L Leger ldquoSlip transition of a pol-ymer melt under shear stressrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 70no 3 pp 287ndash290 1993
[13] S Das S K Guchhait and R N Jana ldquoHall effects on unsteadyhydromagnetic flow past an accelerated porous plate in arotating systemrdquo Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics vol 8 no3 pp 409ndash417 2015
[14] A S Chethan G N Sekhar and P G Siddheshwar ldquoFlow andheat transfer of an exponential stretching sheet in a viscoelasticliquid with navier slip boundary conditionrdquo Journal of AppliedFluid Mechanics vol 8 no 2 pp 223ndash229 2015
[15] M Khan R Malik and A Anjum ldquoExact solutions of MHDsecond Stokes flow of generalized Burgers fluidrdquo Applied Math-ematics and Mechanics vol 36 no 2 pp 211ndash224 2015
[16] I Khan F Ali and S Shafie ldquoStokesrsquo second problem for mag-netohydrodynamics flow in a Burgersrsquo fluid the cases 120574 = 120582
2
4
and 120574 gt 1205822
4rdquo PLoS ONE vol 8 no 5 Article ID e61531 2013[17] A M Siddiqui T Haroon M Zahid and A Shahzad ldquoEffect of
slip condition on unsteady flows of an oldroyd-B fluid betweenparallel platesrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 13 no 11 pp2282ndash2287 2011
[18] DVieru andAA Zafar ldquoSomeCouette flows of aMaxwell fluidwith wall slip conditionrdquo Applied Mathematics amp InformationSciences vol 7 no 1 pp 209ndash219 2013
[19] D Vieru and A Rauf ldquoStokes flows of a Maxwell fluid with wallslip conditionrdquo Canadian Journal of Physics vol 89 no 10 pp1061ndash1071 2011
[20] C Fetecau N Nigar D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoFirst generalsolution for unidirectional motions of rate type fluids over aninfinite platerdquoCommunications inNumerical Analysis vol 2 pp125ndash138 2015
[21] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and I Pop ldquoSlip effects on theunsteady radiative MHD free convection flow over a movingplate with mass diffusion and heat sourcerdquoThe European Phys-ical Journal Plus vol 130 article 6 2015
[22] A-R A Khaled and K Vafai ldquoThe effect of the slip conditionon Stokes and Couette flows due to an oscillating wall exactsolutionsrdquo International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics vol39 no 5 pp 795ndash809 2004
[23] T Hayat M F Afzaal C Fetecau and A A Hendi ldquoSlip effectson the oscillatory flow in a porous mediumrdquo Journal of PorousMedia vol 14 no 6 pp 481ndash493 2011
[24] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and S Akhter ldquoGeneral solu-tions for magnetohydrodynamic natural convection flow withradiative heat transfer and slip condition over a moving platerdquoZeitschrift fur Naturforschung A vol 68 pp 659ndash667 2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
08
06
04
02
0
Velo
city
1
08
06
04
02
0
t = 5
t = 3
t = 15
minus02
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
Re = 125 slipRe = 175 slipRe = 225 slip
Re = 125 no slipRe = 175 no slipRe = 225 no slip
u(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Figure 1 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different Reynolds number
For a fixed value of the time 119905 or for a fixed value of theReynolds number the issues whichmust be highlighted are asfollows
The fluid flows more slowly if slippage occurs on theboundary Increasing of the Reynolds number values leads
to slowing of the flows in both cases with or without slip Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then it increases thethickness of the velocity boundary layer
Figure 3 was drawn in order to compare the velocityflows for Oldroyd-B Maxwell and Newtonian fluids It is
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
1
08
06
04
02
0
0
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
Re = 05
Re = 25
Re = 10
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t = 20 slipt = 50 slip
t = 05 slip
minus02
08
06
04
02
minus02
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
Figure 2 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different values of the time 119905
important to note that for the flow with no slip on theboundary the velocity of Maxwell fluid has significant varia-tions in the area near plateThis no longer occurs if the flow iswith slip at the boundary Also the thickness of the boundary
layer of the Maxwell fluid is the smallest and the speed of thistype of fluid becomes zero more quickly than other fluids Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then the differencesbetween velocities of the three fluids become insignificant
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
t = 05
t = 075
t = 155
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Figure 3 Comparison between velocity profiles of three fluid models with slip condition with 120573 = 055 and no-slip condition for Re = 065120582 = 055 and 120582
119903= 035
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
References
[1] K R Rajagopal and A R Srinivasa ldquoA thermodynamic framework for rate type fluid modelsrdquo Journal of Non-NewtonianFluid Mechanics vol 88 no 3 pp 207ndash227 2000
[2] R I Tanner ldquoNote on the Rayleigh problem for a visco-elasticfluidrdquo Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik vol13 no 6 pp 573ndash580 1962
[3] K R Rajagopal and R K Bhatnagar ldquoExact solutions for somesimple flows of an Oldroyd-B fluidrdquo Acta Mechanica vol 113no 1 pp 233ndash239 1995
[4] N D Waters and M J King ldquoUnsteady flow of an elastico-viscous liquidrdquo Rheologica Acta vol 9 no 3 pp 345ndash355 1970
[5] P Puri and P K Kythe ldquoStokes first and second problems forRivlin-Ericksen fluids with neoclassical heat conditionrdquo ASMEJournal of Heat Transfer vol 120 pp 44ndash50 1996
[6] P M Jordan and A Puri ldquoRevisiting Stokesrsquo first problem forMaxwell fluidsrdquoTheQuarterly Journal ofMechanics and AppliedMathematics vol 58 no 2 pp 213ndash227 2005
[7] C Fetecau D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoA note on the secondproblem of Stokes for Newtonian fluidsrdquo International Journalof Non-Linear Mechanics vol 43 no 5 pp 451ndash457 2008
[8] R I Tanner ldquoPartial wall slip in polymer flowrdquo Industrial andEngineering Chemistry Research vol 33 no 10 pp 2434ndash24361994
[9] M Navier ldquoMemoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluidsrdquoMemoires de lrsquoAcademie des Sciences de LrsquoInstitut de France vol6 pp 389ndash440 1823
[10] I J Rao and K R Rajagopal ldquoThe effect of the slip boundarycondition on the flow of fluids in a channelrdquo Acta Mechanicavol 135 no 3-4 pp 113ndash126 1999
[11] M Mooney ldquoExplicit formulas for slip and fluidityrdquo Journal ofRheology vol 2 no 2 pp 210ndash222 1931
[12] K B Migler H Hervet and L Leger ldquoSlip transition of a pol-ymer melt under shear stressrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 70no 3 pp 287ndash290 1993
[13] S Das S K Guchhait and R N Jana ldquoHall effects on unsteadyhydromagnetic flow past an accelerated porous plate in arotating systemrdquo Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics vol 8 no3 pp 409ndash417 2015
[14] A S Chethan G N Sekhar and P G Siddheshwar ldquoFlow andheat transfer of an exponential stretching sheet in a viscoelasticliquid with navier slip boundary conditionrdquo Journal of AppliedFluid Mechanics vol 8 no 2 pp 223ndash229 2015
[15] M Khan R Malik and A Anjum ldquoExact solutions of MHDsecond Stokes flow of generalized Burgers fluidrdquo Applied Math-ematics and Mechanics vol 36 no 2 pp 211ndash224 2015
[16] I Khan F Ali and S Shafie ldquoStokesrsquo second problem for mag-netohydrodynamics flow in a Burgersrsquo fluid the cases 120574 = 120582
2
4
and 120574 gt 1205822
4rdquo PLoS ONE vol 8 no 5 Article ID e61531 2013[17] A M Siddiqui T Haroon M Zahid and A Shahzad ldquoEffect of
slip condition on unsteady flows of an oldroyd-B fluid betweenparallel platesrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 13 no 11 pp2282ndash2287 2011
[18] DVieru andAA Zafar ldquoSomeCouette flows of aMaxwell fluidwith wall slip conditionrdquo Applied Mathematics amp InformationSciences vol 7 no 1 pp 209ndash219 2013
[19] D Vieru and A Rauf ldquoStokes flows of a Maxwell fluid with wallslip conditionrdquo Canadian Journal of Physics vol 89 no 10 pp1061ndash1071 2011
[20] C Fetecau N Nigar D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoFirst generalsolution for unidirectional motions of rate type fluids over aninfinite platerdquoCommunications inNumerical Analysis vol 2 pp125ndash138 2015
[21] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and I Pop ldquoSlip effects on theunsteady radiative MHD free convection flow over a movingplate with mass diffusion and heat sourcerdquoThe European Phys-ical Journal Plus vol 130 article 6 2015
[22] A-R A Khaled and K Vafai ldquoThe effect of the slip conditionon Stokes and Couette flows due to an oscillating wall exactsolutionsrdquo International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics vol39 no 5 pp 795ndash809 2004
[23] T Hayat M F Afzaal C Fetecau and A A Hendi ldquoSlip effectson the oscillatory flow in a porous mediumrdquo Journal of PorousMedia vol 14 no 6 pp 481ndash493 2011
[24] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and S Akhter ldquoGeneral solu-tions for magnetohydrodynamic natural convection flow withradiative heat transfer and slip condition over a moving platerdquoZeitschrift fur Naturforschung A vol 68 pp 659ndash667 2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
1
08
06
04
02
0
1
1
08
06
04
02
0
0
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
0 2 4 6 8
y
Re = 05
Re = 25
Re = 10
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t =
t =
t =
t = 05 no slipt = 20 no slipt = 50 no slip
t = 20 slipt = 50 slip
t = 05 slip
minus02
08
06
04
02
minus02
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
Velo
cityu(yt)
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
20 slip50 slip
05 slip
Figure 2 Velocity profiles of Oldroyd-B fluid for slip condition (16) with 120573 = 075 and no-slip condition (20) for 120582 = 025 120582119903= 015 and
different values of the time 119905
important to note that for the flow with no slip on theboundary the velocity of Maxwell fluid has significant varia-tions in the area near plateThis no longer occurs if the flow iswith slip at the boundary Also the thickness of the boundary
layer of the Maxwell fluid is the smallest and the speed of thistype of fluid becomes zero more quickly than other fluids Ifthe values of the time 119905 are increasing then the differencesbetween velocities of the three fluids become insignificant
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
t = 05
t = 075
t = 155
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Figure 3 Comparison between velocity profiles of three fluid models with slip condition with 120573 = 055 and no-slip condition for Re = 065120582 = 055 and 120582
119903= 035
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
References
[1] K R Rajagopal and A R Srinivasa ldquoA thermodynamic framework for rate type fluid modelsrdquo Journal of Non-NewtonianFluid Mechanics vol 88 no 3 pp 207ndash227 2000
[2] R I Tanner ldquoNote on the Rayleigh problem for a visco-elasticfluidrdquo Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik vol13 no 6 pp 573ndash580 1962
[3] K R Rajagopal and R K Bhatnagar ldquoExact solutions for somesimple flows of an Oldroyd-B fluidrdquo Acta Mechanica vol 113no 1 pp 233ndash239 1995
[4] N D Waters and M J King ldquoUnsteady flow of an elastico-viscous liquidrdquo Rheologica Acta vol 9 no 3 pp 345ndash355 1970
[5] P Puri and P K Kythe ldquoStokes first and second problems forRivlin-Ericksen fluids with neoclassical heat conditionrdquo ASMEJournal of Heat Transfer vol 120 pp 44ndash50 1996
[6] P M Jordan and A Puri ldquoRevisiting Stokesrsquo first problem forMaxwell fluidsrdquoTheQuarterly Journal ofMechanics and AppliedMathematics vol 58 no 2 pp 213ndash227 2005
[7] C Fetecau D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoA note on the secondproblem of Stokes for Newtonian fluidsrdquo International Journalof Non-Linear Mechanics vol 43 no 5 pp 451ndash457 2008
[8] R I Tanner ldquoPartial wall slip in polymer flowrdquo Industrial andEngineering Chemistry Research vol 33 no 10 pp 2434ndash24361994
[9] M Navier ldquoMemoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluidsrdquoMemoires de lrsquoAcademie des Sciences de LrsquoInstitut de France vol6 pp 389ndash440 1823
[10] I J Rao and K R Rajagopal ldquoThe effect of the slip boundarycondition on the flow of fluids in a channelrdquo Acta Mechanicavol 135 no 3-4 pp 113ndash126 1999
[11] M Mooney ldquoExplicit formulas for slip and fluidityrdquo Journal ofRheology vol 2 no 2 pp 210ndash222 1931
[12] K B Migler H Hervet and L Leger ldquoSlip transition of a pol-ymer melt under shear stressrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 70no 3 pp 287ndash290 1993
[13] S Das S K Guchhait and R N Jana ldquoHall effects on unsteadyhydromagnetic flow past an accelerated porous plate in arotating systemrdquo Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics vol 8 no3 pp 409ndash417 2015
[14] A S Chethan G N Sekhar and P G Siddheshwar ldquoFlow andheat transfer of an exponential stretching sheet in a viscoelasticliquid with navier slip boundary conditionrdquo Journal of AppliedFluid Mechanics vol 8 no 2 pp 223ndash229 2015
[15] M Khan R Malik and A Anjum ldquoExact solutions of MHDsecond Stokes flow of generalized Burgers fluidrdquo Applied Math-ematics and Mechanics vol 36 no 2 pp 211ndash224 2015
[16] I Khan F Ali and S Shafie ldquoStokesrsquo second problem for mag-netohydrodynamics flow in a Burgersrsquo fluid the cases 120574 = 120582
2
4
and 120574 gt 1205822
4rdquo PLoS ONE vol 8 no 5 Article ID e61531 2013[17] A M Siddiqui T Haroon M Zahid and A Shahzad ldquoEffect of
slip condition on unsteady flows of an oldroyd-B fluid betweenparallel platesrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 13 no 11 pp2282ndash2287 2011
[18] DVieru andAA Zafar ldquoSomeCouette flows of aMaxwell fluidwith wall slip conditionrdquo Applied Mathematics amp InformationSciences vol 7 no 1 pp 209ndash219 2013
[19] D Vieru and A Rauf ldquoStokes flows of a Maxwell fluid with wallslip conditionrdquo Canadian Journal of Physics vol 89 no 10 pp1061ndash1071 2011
[20] C Fetecau N Nigar D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoFirst generalsolution for unidirectional motions of rate type fluids over aninfinite platerdquoCommunications inNumerical Analysis vol 2 pp125ndash138 2015
[21] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and I Pop ldquoSlip effects on theunsteady radiative MHD free convection flow over a movingplate with mass diffusion and heat sourcerdquoThe European Phys-ical Journal Plus vol 130 article 6 2015
[22] A-R A Khaled and K Vafai ldquoThe effect of the slip conditionon Stokes and Couette flows due to an oscillating wall exactsolutionsrdquo International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics vol39 no 5 pp 795ndash809 2004
[23] T Hayat M F Afzaal C Fetecau and A A Hendi ldquoSlip effectson the oscillatory flow in a porous mediumrdquo Journal of PorousMedia vol 14 no 6 pp 481ndash493 2011
[24] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and S Akhter ldquoGeneral solu-tions for magnetohydrodynamic natural convection flow withradiative heat transfer and slip condition over a moving platerdquoZeitschrift fur Naturforschung A vol 68 pp 659ndash667 2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
15
1
05
0
minus05
Velo
cityu(yt)
t = 05
t = 075
t = 155
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
0 1 2
y
3
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Oldroyd-B fluid slipMaxwell fluid slipNewtonian fluid slip
Oldroyd-B fluid no slipMaxwell fluid no slipNewtonian fluid no slip
Figure 3 Comparison between velocity profiles of three fluid models with slip condition with 120573 = 055 and no-slip condition for Re = 065120582 = 055 and 120582
119903= 035
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
References
[1] K R Rajagopal and A R Srinivasa ldquoA thermodynamic framework for rate type fluid modelsrdquo Journal of Non-NewtonianFluid Mechanics vol 88 no 3 pp 207ndash227 2000
[2] R I Tanner ldquoNote on the Rayleigh problem for a visco-elasticfluidrdquo Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik vol13 no 6 pp 573ndash580 1962
[3] K R Rajagopal and R K Bhatnagar ldquoExact solutions for somesimple flows of an Oldroyd-B fluidrdquo Acta Mechanica vol 113no 1 pp 233ndash239 1995
[4] N D Waters and M J King ldquoUnsteady flow of an elastico-viscous liquidrdquo Rheologica Acta vol 9 no 3 pp 345ndash355 1970
[5] P Puri and P K Kythe ldquoStokes first and second problems forRivlin-Ericksen fluids with neoclassical heat conditionrdquo ASMEJournal of Heat Transfer vol 120 pp 44ndash50 1996
[6] P M Jordan and A Puri ldquoRevisiting Stokesrsquo first problem forMaxwell fluidsrdquoTheQuarterly Journal ofMechanics and AppliedMathematics vol 58 no 2 pp 213ndash227 2005
[7] C Fetecau D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoA note on the secondproblem of Stokes for Newtonian fluidsrdquo International Journalof Non-Linear Mechanics vol 43 no 5 pp 451ndash457 2008
[8] R I Tanner ldquoPartial wall slip in polymer flowrdquo Industrial andEngineering Chemistry Research vol 33 no 10 pp 2434ndash24361994
[9] M Navier ldquoMemoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluidsrdquoMemoires de lrsquoAcademie des Sciences de LrsquoInstitut de France vol6 pp 389ndash440 1823
[10] I J Rao and K R Rajagopal ldquoThe effect of the slip boundarycondition on the flow of fluids in a channelrdquo Acta Mechanicavol 135 no 3-4 pp 113ndash126 1999
[11] M Mooney ldquoExplicit formulas for slip and fluidityrdquo Journal ofRheology vol 2 no 2 pp 210ndash222 1931
[12] K B Migler H Hervet and L Leger ldquoSlip transition of a pol-ymer melt under shear stressrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 70no 3 pp 287ndash290 1993
[13] S Das S K Guchhait and R N Jana ldquoHall effects on unsteadyhydromagnetic flow past an accelerated porous plate in arotating systemrdquo Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics vol 8 no3 pp 409ndash417 2015
[14] A S Chethan G N Sekhar and P G Siddheshwar ldquoFlow andheat transfer of an exponential stretching sheet in a viscoelasticliquid with navier slip boundary conditionrdquo Journal of AppliedFluid Mechanics vol 8 no 2 pp 223ndash229 2015
[15] M Khan R Malik and A Anjum ldquoExact solutions of MHDsecond Stokes flow of generalized Burgers fluidrdquo Applied Math-ematics and Mechanics vol 36 no 2 pp 211ndash224 2015
[16] I Khan F Ali and S Shafie ldquoStokesrsquo second problem for mag-netohydrodynamics flow in a Burgersrsquo fluid the cases 120574 = 120582
2
4
and 120574 gt 1205822
4rdquo PLoS ONE vol 8 no 5 Article ID e61531 2013[17] A M Siddiqui T Haroon M Zahid and A Shahzad ldquoEffect of
slip condition on unsteady flows of an oldroyd-B fluid betweenparallel platesrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 13 no 11 pp2282ndash2287 2011
[18] DVieru andAA Zafar ldquoSomeCouette flows of aMaxwell fluidwith wall slip conditionrdquo Applied Mathematics amp InformationSciences vol 7 no 1 pp 209ndash219 2013
[19] D Vieru and A Rauf ldquoStokes flows of a Maxwell fluid with wallslip conditionrdquo Canadian Journal of Physics vol 89 no 10 pp1061ndash1071 2011
[20] C Fetecau N Nigar D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoFirst generalsolution for unidirectional motions of rate type fluids over aninfinite platerdquoCommunications inNumerical Analysis vol 2 pp125ndash138 2015
[21] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and I Pop ldquoSlip effects on theunsteady radiative MHD free convection flow over a movingplate with mass diffusion and heat sourcerdquoThe European Phys-ical Journal Plus vol 130 article 6 2015
[22] A-R A Khaled and K Vafai ldquoThe effect of the slip conditionon Stokes and Couette flows due to an oscillating wall exactsolutionsrdquo International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics vol39 no 5 pp 795ndash809 2004
[23] T Hayat M F Afzaal C Fetecau and A A Hendi ldquoSlip effectson the oscillatory flow in a porous mediumrdquo Journal of PorousMedia vol 14 no 6 pp 481ndash493 2011
[24] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and S Akhter ldquoGeneral solu-tions for magnetohydrodynamic natural convection flow withradiative heat transfer and slip condition over a moving platerdquoZeitschrift fur Naturforschung A vol 68 pp 659ndash667 2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
References
[1] K R Rajagopal and A R Srinivasa ldquoA thermodynamic framework for rate type fluid modelsrdquo Journal of Non-NewtonianFluid Mechanics vol 88 no 3 pp 207ndash227 2000
[2] R I Tanner ldquoNote on the Rayleigh problem for a visco-elasticfluidrdquo Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik vol13 no 6 pp 573ndash580 1962
[3] K R Rajagopal and R K Bhatnagar ldquoExact solutions for somesimple flows of an Oldroyd-B fluidrdquo Acta Mechanica vol 113no 1 pp 233ndash239 1995
[4] N D Waters and M J King ldquoUnsteady flow of an elastico-viscous liquidrdquo Rheologica Acta vol 9 no 3 pp 345ndash355 1970
[5] P Puri and P K Kythe ldquoStokes first and second problems forRivlin-Ericksen fluids with neoclassical heat conditionrdquo ASMEJournal of Heat Transfer vol 120 pp 44ndash50 1996
[6] P M Jordan and A Puri ldquoRevisiting Stokesrsquo first problem forMaxwell fluidsrdquoTheQuarterly Journal ofMechanics and AppliedMathematics vol 58 no 2 pp 213ndash227 2005
[7] C Fetecau D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoA note on the secondproblem of Stokes for Newtonian fluidsrdquo International Journalof Non-Linear Mechanics vol 43 no 5 pp 451ndash457 2008
[8] R I Tanner ldquoPartial wall slip in polymer flowrdquo Industrial andEngineering Chemistry Research vol 33 no 10 pp 2434ndash24361994
[9] M Navier ldquoMemoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluidsrdquoMemoires de lrsquoAcademie des Sciences de LrsquoInstitut de France vol6 pp 389ndash440 1823
[10] I J Rao and K R Rajagopal ldquoThe effect of the slip boundarycondition on the flow of fluids in a channelrdquo Acta Mechanicavol 135 no 3-4 pp 113ndash126 1999
[11] M Mooney ldquoExplicit formulas for slip and fluidityrdquo Journal ofRheology vol 2 no 2 pp 210ndash222 1931
[12] K B Migler H Hervet and L Leger ldquoSlip transition of a pol-ymer melt under shear stressrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 70no 3 pp 287ndash290 1993
[13] S Das S K Guchhait and R N Jana ldquoHall effects on unsteadyhydromagnetic flow past an accelerated porous plate in arotating systemrdquo Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics vol 8 no3 pp 409ndash417 2015
[14] A S Chethan G N Sekhar and P G Siddheshwar ldquoFlow andheat transfer of an exponential stretching sheet in a viscoelasticliquid with navier slip boundary conditionrdquo Journal of AppliedFluid Mechanics vol 8 no 2 pp 223ndash229 2015
[15] M Khan R Malik and A Anjum ldquoExact solutions of MHDsecond Stokes flow of generalized Burgers fluidrdquo Applied Math-ematics and Mechanics vol 36 no 2 pp 211ndash224 2015
[16] I Khan F Ali and S Shafie ldquoStokesrsquo second problem for mag-netohydrodynamics flow in a Burgersrsquo fluid the cases 120574 = 120582
2
4
and 120574 gt 1205822
4rdquo PLoS ONE vol 8 no 5 Article ID e61531 2013[17] A M Siddiqui T Haroon M Zahid and A Shahzad ldquoEffect of
slip condition on unsteady flows of an oldroyd-B fluid betweenparallel platesrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 13 no 11 pp2282ndash2287 2011
[18] DVieru andAA Zafar ldquoSomeCouette flows of aMaxwell fluidwith wall slip conditionrdquo Applied Mathematics amp InformationSciences vol 7 no 1 pp 209ndash219 2013
[19] D Vieru and A Rauf ldquoStokes flows of a Maxwell fluid with wallslip conditionrdquo Canadian Journal of Physics vol 89 no 10 pp1061ndash1071 2011
[20] C Fetecau N Nigar D Vieru and C Fetecau ldquoFirst generalsolution for unidirectional motions of rate type fluids over aninfinite platerdquoCommunications inNumerical Analysis vol 2 pp125ndash138 2015
[21] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and I Pop ldquoSlip effects on theunsteady radiative MHD free convection flow over a movingplate with mass diffusion and heat sourcerdquoThe European Phys-ical Journal Plus vol 130 article 6 2015
[22] A-R A Khaled and K Vafai ldquoThe effect of the slip conditionon Stokes and Couette flows due to an oscillating wall exactsolutionsrdquo International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics vol39 no 5 pp 795ndash809 2004
[23] T Hayat M F Afzaal C Fetecau and A A Hendi ldquoSlip effectson the oscillatory flow in a porous mediumrdquo Journal of PorousMedia vol 14 no 6 pp 481ndash493 2011
[24] C Fetecau D Vieru C Fetecau and S Akhter ldquoGeneral solu-tions for magnetohydrodynamic natural convection flow withradiative heat transfer and slip condition over a moving platerdquoZeitschrift fur Naturforschung A vol 68 pp 659ndash667 2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of