Upload
chester-hamilton
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Research and Innovation in the measurement of well-being
(the swing of the pendulum)
The common path to face the challenges of equitable and sustainable well-being
Giorgio Sirilli
ISSiRFA - CNR
Scientific research (R&D) and innovation have a “loose” relationship with equitable and sustainable well-being
Scientific research is an activity while innovation manifest itself in a new product or process
Technological innovation goes hand in hand with other types of innovation: organisational, marketing, aesthetic
These phenomena shange slowly over time
Some theoretical issues
For 2,500 years innovation was an eminently contested idea. It was pejorative and negative. An innovator was a deviant, a revolutionary, a socialist. For centuries innovation was essentially a political concept
In the nineteen and twentieth century innovation became an object of praise and fashion: from a vice to a virtue. “Innovation is always good”
In the twentieth century the concept became restricted to technological innovation
The relationship between innovation and imitation: economists vs sociologists
Some theoretical issues - Innovation
The report
The report
At the basis of progress
Research and innovation represent an indirect determinant of well-being. They are at the basis of the social and economic progress, and provide a fundamental contribution to a sustainable and durable development. In the identification of suitable indicators, those which best reflect phenomena such as research, innovation and high level professional capabilities have been privileged. R&D and innovation indicators which have been selected refer to different dimensions of knowledge: creation, application and diffusion.
Interaction with other BES domains
Discrimination capacity, stability, durability
Saturation, obsolescence
Frequent spatial and time comparisons
Regional and international data in time sieries
Parsimony, progressiveness, robustness
Few key indicators amenable to be integrated with others; international data sources to be privileged
Choice of indicators
A first list (14 indicators)
Digital inclusion (3 indicators)
Creation and use of knowledge in the economic system (6 indicators)
Results of the use of knowledge (5 indicators)The final list (7 indicators)
Creation of knowledgeApplication and diffusion of knowledge
Our story: from 14 to 7 indicators
Intensity of Internet use
Use of web 2.0 technologies from individuals
Digitalisation of the services provided by local authorities
Digital inclusion
R&D intensity (R&D/Gdp)
Knowledge workers on employment
Researchers on employment
PhDs on employment
Highly qualified human resources working abroad
Scientific publications
Creation and use of knowledge in the economic system
Innovation rate of the national production system
Innovation rate of product/service of the national production system
Propensity to patent
Propensity to patent in social and environmental fields
Production specialisation of knowledge-intensive sectors
Results of the use of knowledge
Creation of knowledgeApplication and diffusion of knowledge
Final result
1. R&D intensity: Percentage of R&D expenditure on GDP2. Propensity to patent: Number of patent applications filed to
the European Patent Office (EPO) per million of inhabitants3. Impact of knowledge workers on employment: Percentage of
persons employed with university education (ISCED 5-6) in scientific-technological occupations (ISCO 2-3) on total persons employed
4. Innovation rate of the production system: Percentage of firms that have introduced technological (product or process), organizational or marketing innovation in a three-year period on total number of firms with at least 10 number of persons employed
(7 indicators)
5. Innovation rate of product/service of the national production system: Percentage of firms that have introduced innovations of product/service in a three-years period on total number of firms with at least 10 number of persons employed
6. Production specialization in knowledge-intensive sectors: Percentage of persons employed in high-tech manufacturing sectors and those in knowledge-intensive services on total of persons employed
7. Intensity of Internet use: Percentage of people aged 16-74 years who have used internet at least once a week during the 12 months before the interview on total people aged 16-74 years
(7 indicators cont’d)
8. Highly qualified human resources working abroad: Percentage of graduates and PhD graduates (ISCED 5 -6) working abroad on total labor force with university education.
(Possible candidate)
1. Intensity of internet use 22. Use of Web 2.0 technologies
3. Digitalisation of local services
4. R&D intensity 45. Knowledge workers 26. Researchers on employment
7. PhDs on employment
8. Highly qualified human resources
9. Scientific publications
10. Innovation rate of production system
11. Innovation in products/services 112. Propensity to patent 113. Propensity to patent in social environmental fields
14. Production specialization of knowledge-intensive sectors
Digital inclusion
Creation and use of knowledge
Results of the use of
knowledge
Number of
Tables in
Report (10)
Selected indicator
s (7)
Proposed
indicators
(14)
Areas(3)
1. Intensity of internet use 22. Use of Web 2.0 technologies
3. Digitalisation of local services
4. R&D intensity 45. Knowledge workers 26. Researchers on employment
7. PhDs on employment
8. Highly qualified human resources
9. Scientific publications
10. Innovation rate of production system
11. Innovation in products/services 112. Propensity to patent 113. Propensity to patent in social environmental fields
14. Production specialization of knowledge-intensive sectors
Digital inclusion
Creation and use of knowledge
Results of the use of
knowledge
Number of
Tables in
Report (10)
Selected indicator
s (7)
Proposed
indicators
(14)
Areas(3)
1. Intensity of internet use 22. Use of Web 2.0 technologies
3. Digitalisation of local services
4. R&D intensity 45. Knowledge workers 26. Researchers on employment
7. PhDs on employment
8. Highly qualified human resources
9. Scientific publications
10. Innovation rate of production system
11. Innovation in products/services 112. Propensity to patent 113. Propensity to patent in social environmental fields
14. Production specialization of knowledge-intensive sectors
Digital inclusion
Creation and use of knowledge
Results of the use of
knowledge
Number of
Tables in
Report (10)
Selected indicator
s (7)
Proposed
indicators
(14)
Areas(3)
Some examples (to be added)
R&D
Patents
Human resources
Innovation
Internet
The swing of the pendulum
From society … to economy
(14 indicators) (7 indicators)
Thank you