Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
Research and
development needs in
a step-wise process
for the nuclear waste
programme in
Sweden
2016-10-19 1
Ström A1, Pers K2, Andersson J1, Ekeroth E1, Hedin A1 1 Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Mgmt. Co. (SKB), Stockholm, Sweden 2 SKB International AB, Stockholm, Sweden
E-mail contact of main author: [email protected]
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
Outline of presentation
• Background
• Implementation plan
• Continued research and technology development
• Concluding remarks
2 CNS Sep 2011
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
Nuclear in Sweden
• 9 (12) operating reactor units at 3
sites
• ~ 40 % of electricity
• Operation since 1972/85
• SFR; Final Repository for Short-
lived Radioactive Waste
• Clab; Central Interim Storage
Facility for Spent Nuclear Fuel
3
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
Management and disposal of
radioactive waste
and spent nuclear fuel
4
Based on current planning from NPP’s:
• Reference scenario
− During 2015 decisions have been made on
a premature shutdown of four reactors
(Oskarshamn 1-2, Ringhals 1-2). 60 years
of operation for all remaining plants.
• Spent nuclear fuel
− Approx. 11 400 tonnes of spent fuel
− Approx. 5 700 canisters
• LLW and ILW
− From operation and decommissioning
− Approx. 170 000 m3 short-lived waste
− Approx. 16 000 m3 long-lived waste
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
Research, Development and Demonstration
Programme 2016
• Requirements according to the Nuclear
Activities Act
− License holders for nuclear reactors should every
3rd year submit a programme for research and
development and other measures necessary for
decommissioning of nuclear facilities and final
disposal of nuclear waste
− The programme should provide an overview of all
measures that might may be necessary and specify
in more detail the measures that are intended to be
implemented within at least six years
− The programme shall be submitted to Swedish
Radiation Safety Authority (SSM)
• Has been in effect since 1986
5
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
Outline of presentation
6 CNS Sep 2011
• Background
• Implementation plan
• Continued research and technology development
• Concluding remarks
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
Licensing review according to Nuclear Activities
Act and Environmental Code
SKB’s applications
One according to
Environmental
Code
Two according to
Nuclear Act
Court hearings Review
Decides
Permit and conditions Approves Safety Report
Approves or disapproves
7
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
• For establishing nuclear facilities, planning is based on the stepwise decision process in
the Nuclear Activities Act and SSM regulations
• The safety analysis report (SAR) is central and should provide an overall view of how the
safety of the facility is arranged in order to protect human health and the environment
against nuclear accidents. The implementer needs to provide successively refined safety
reports to the regulator.
• The planning and milestones related to decision steps in the form of applications and
safety analysis reports determine when knowledge and development of the technology
needs to have reached a certain level, while SSM’s approval determines when SKB can
commence construction and operation of the facilities.
Step-wise process and planning
F-PSAR PSAR SAR
8
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
Future important
milestones
9
Low and intermediate level waste
• License review on-going for extension of SFR, technology development, detailed design in parallel
• Construction work for extension of SFR starts 2022, operation 2028
• Interim storages for decommissioning waste established
• Safety evaluation of SFL repository concept 2018
• Application to construct SFL approx 2030
Spent Nuclear Fuel
• License review of the KBS-3 system
• Technology development – industrial operation
• Nuclear Fuel Repository – planning for detailed design on-going, start construction 2020, trial operation 2030, regular operation 2032
• Encapsulation Plant – system design to start, start construction 2022, trial operation 2030, regular operation 2032
• Planning for increased storage capacity at interim storage Clab. Safety concept established.
• Safety analysis reports (PSAR) for the KBS-3-system in progress
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
Outline of presentation
10 CNS Sep 2011
• Background
• Implementation plan
• Continued research and technology development
• Concluding remarks
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
12
Milestones KBS-3
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
R&D needs in relation to milestones - KBS-3
• Before the start of construction of the Spent Fuel Repository and the
encapsulation plant
• Preliminary Safety Report, PSAR will be updated with some of the material presented in the supplement to the application
under the Nuclear Activities Act and the updates in the initial state as ongoing technology development lead to.
• The goal of technology development is to ensure that the technology needed to begin construction of the Spent Fuel Repository
and the encapsulation portion of Clink, is available before the start of construction.
• Detailed design phase will essentially have been passed for all barrier systems, except for the parts that require in situ tests.
For the Spent Fuel Repository this first regards characterization methods and techniques for the construction of the repository
access.
• Construction start deposition area
• At the start of construction of the deposition area of the Spent Fuel Repository the design requirements for this must be
established and therefore also the design and installation methods for the buffer, backfill and plugs need to be finished as well
as methods for the host rock characterization and methodology for excavation of deposition tunnels. Control methods to be
applied shall be verified.
• Before the trial operation
• Integration testing and commissioning tests need to need to be conducted in the nuclear fuel repository and be reported in the
updated Safety Analysis Report (SAR)
• Before the routine operation of the KBS-3 system
• An updated safety analysis report, SAR, considering the experience of trial operation is needed
13
F-PSAR PSAR SAR
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
• The need for an increased process understanding
− Judge the importance for post-closure safe
o Remaining uncertainties
o Less pessimistic assumptions
• The need for knowledge and competence around design,
construction, manufacture and installation of the components
− From conceptual design to working facilities
• The need for knowledge and competence around inspection and
testing
− verify that the barriers and components are produced and installed according
to approved specifications and thereby satisfy the requirements
Basis for continued research and technology
development
14
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
• Post closure safety
− Corrosion (sulphides, …)
− Copper creep – understanding the process and function of
phosphorus
• Technology development
− Canister design should be verified in conformity with
requirements, manufacturing methods verified, testing and
control processes should be developed and prerequisites from
qualification clarified.
o Copper components and welding
o Insert design, manufacturing and qualification
− Basis for canister production system and canister assembly
facility
• Inspection and testing
16
Example: Canister – key R&D issues 2016-
2019
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
• Post closure safety
− Buffer erosion
− Sulphide production
− Homogenisation process
• Technology development needed in time for PSAR
− Basis for updated production reports for BBC, based on
updated technical design requirements.
− Product and process mapping done. Preliminary quality plans
written. Need for qualification clarified
• Technology development for detailed design of production
facility
− Material Procurement Specification established (including
material studies)
− Decision on pressing methodology
− Bentonite block manufacturing and control methods that
works in industrial scale
17
Example: Buffer, backfill, closure key R&D
issues 2016-2019
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
Outline of presentation
18 CNS Sep 2011
• Background
• Implementation plan
• Continued research and technology development
• Concluding remarks
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
• The SKB RD&D Programme 2016
−contains an overview of all the measures that may be necessary
for treatment and final disposal of nuclear waste from Swedish
nuclear reactors and SKB's facilities
−clarifies how research and technology development are justified
and evaluated in a step-wise procedure on the basis of the
measures planned
−presents a strategic plan for the research and development
necessary to establish and implement future activities
−Published as SKB TR 16-15 in December 2016
19
Concluding remarks
SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING
Remaining challenges
• Licensing and acceptance
−SKB, regulator, local authorities and
Government
• Going from theory to practice –
Industrialization
• Keeping public confidence
Thanks for your
attention!