Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Reproductive morphology of themale Tuatara, Sphenodon
punctatus
Justin L. Rheubert,1 Alison Cree,2 Matthew Downes2 and DavidM. Sever3
1Department of Biology, Saint Louis Uni-
versity, 3507 Laclede Ave., St. Louis,
MO, 63103, USA; 2Department of
Zoology, University of Otago, 340 Great
King St., Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand;3Department of Biological Sciences, South-
eastern Louisiana University, SLU 10736,
Hammond, LA, 70401, USA
Keywords:
Tuatara, reproduction, histology, testicular
ducts, sperm
Accepted for publication:
31May 2012
Abstract
Rheubert, J.L., Cree, A., Downes, M. and Sever, D.M. 2013. Reproductive
morphology of the male Tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus. —Acta Zoologica (Stock-
holm) 94: 454–461.
Over the past decade, studies on reproductive morphology in the Squamata
(snakes and lizards) have expanded tremendously. With the accumulation of
these studies and revisions of the terminology based on structural similarities
and differences, it is imperative to review the work on tuataras to determine
whether the structural organization fits the revised terminology of vertebrates.
We investigated the morphology of the male reproductive system in the Tuatara,
Sphenodon punctatus (Rhynchocephalia), the sister taxon to the Squamata. Previ-
ous studies on the Tuatara used a nomenclature for the testicular ducts different
from the current terminology for amniotes. The reproductive system in the Tua-
tara is consistent with reports in the Squamata. Two rete testis tubules exit the
testis within a connective tissue sheath similar to that shown in other squamate
species and the protherian Echidna. Each rete testis divides into multiple ductuli
efferentes that fuse with the epididymis. The epididymis transitions into the duc-
tus deferens where the sperm become more concentrated into spherical bundles.
The ductus deferens enters the cloacal urodeum separately from the ureter. An
ampulla ureter or ampulla urogenital papilla was not observed, which differs
from previous studies of lepidosaurians. Furthermore, a sexual segment of the
kidney (SSK) was not observed, consistent with previous studies on the Tuatara.
Justin L. Rheubert, Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, 3507 Lacl-
ede Ave., St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Introduction
The Tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus (Gray), is the only extant
member of the reptilian order Sphenodonta. This species is
limited to a few islands off the coast of New Zealand, although
attempts are being made to re-establish populations on the
mainland (Besson et al. 2012). Morphological (including
some reproductive characters) and molecular data indicate a
sister relationship between Sphenodon and Squamata, the liz-
ards and snakes (Healy and Jamieson 1994; Evans 2003; Rest
et al. 2003). The minimum divergence time between Rhyn-
chocephalia and Squamata is estimated at 230 million years
(Rest et al. 2003).
The first description regarding morphology of the repro-
ductive tract of male S. punctatus was given by Gunther
(1867). However, the observations made by Gunther (1867)
were based solely on gross morphology. The first histological
study of the testis and its ducts, based upon a single specimen,
was conducted by Osawa (1897). Subsequently, Hogben
(1921) described spermatogenesis, Gabe and Saint Girons
(1964) more thoroughly described the histology of the uro-
genital system, and Saint Girons and Newman (1987) and
Cree et al. (1992) described the histology of the spermato-
genic cycle of S. punctatus. These studies were limited in the
number of specimens examined because of the highly pro-
tected status of this species.
Gabe and Saint Girons (1964) used the nomenclature
developed by Volsøe (1944) for snakes, in which the seminif-
erous tubules pass sperm sequentially into ‘ductuli efferentes’
and ‘ductuli epididymides’ prior to the ductus epididymis.
Sever (2010) demonstrated that in snakes, the ductuli efferen-
tes of Volsøe (1944) should be named the rete testis and that
his ductuli epididymides represent the ductuli efferentes as
recognized in other amniotes, that is, lizards (Akbarsha et al.
© 2012 The Authors
Acta Zoologica© 2012 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences454
Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 94: 454–461 (October 2013) doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2012.00574.x
2007), turtles (Holmes and Gist 2004), crocodilians (Guerre-
ro et al. 2004), birds (Aire 2007), and mammals (Jones
2001). This synonymizing of the nomenclature was developed
using histological techniques and noting that the various ducts
were similar across vertebrate taxa at the cellular level. The
rete testis is made up of a simple squamous epithelium that is
typically non-ciliated (Rheubert et al. 2010; Sever and Free-
born 2012). The ductuli efferentes are the smallest of the tes-
ticular ducts (Sever 2010) and have a heavily ciliated simple
cuboidal epithelium. The epididymis is the largest duct adja-
cent to the testis and has a pseudostratified secretory colum-
nar epithelium (Jones 2001). The epididymis transitions into
the ductus deferens, which also possesses a pseudostratified
columnar epithelium that is less secretory. In snakes, the duc-
tus deferens may have a distal ampulla ductus deferentis and
join with the ureter to form an ampulla–ureter complex
(Trauth and Sever 2011). An ampulla ductus deferentis is also
known in lizards (Akbarsha and Meeran 1995), but the anat-
omy of sperm duct junctions with the ureter has not been
studied in lizards.
The first objective of this study is to examine the testicular
ducts of male S. punctatus to determine whether they are
unique among amniotes and deserving of a different nomen-
clature or whether they appear structurally and functionally
homologous to those ducts in other amniotes. The second
objective is to examine the kidneys of S. punctatus for the pres-
ence of a sexual segment of the kidney (SSK), a secondary sex
structure otherwise unique to male Squamata (Aldridge et al.
2011; Rheubert et al. 2011). Gabe and Saint Girons (1964)
could find no evidence for a SSK, but indicated this may be
due to the inactive reproductive condition of their specimens.
Saint Girons and Newman (1987) revisited this with five
specimens and once again found no SSK.
Materials andMethods
Left reproductive tracts were taken from three adult male
Tuatara at the Otago Museum, Dunedin, New Zealand. The
specimens had been fixed in 10% formalin and stored in 70%
ethanol. No collection data were available for the specimens
utilized in this study. Tissue samples were dehydrated with a
graded series of ethanol solutions (95%, 100% 9 2) and
cleared with two changes of xylene for 20 min each. Tissues
were then placed in melted paraffin at 60 °C under vacuum
overnight before being embedded in fresh paraffin using a
Leica EG 1120 wax embedding station (Leica Microsystems,
Wetzlar, Germany). Tissue blocks were sectioned to 10 lmon a Leica RM 2125RT microtome (Leica Microsystems),
placed on slides flooded with deionized water, and dried on a
slide warmer for 1 h. Alternate slides were stained with Gills
II hematoxylin and eosin, Coomassie brilliant blue R-250,
and periodic acid Schiff’s reagent with an alcian blue at pH
2.5 counterstain for general cytology, proteins, and carbohy-
drates and carboxylated glycosaminoglycans, respectively
(Hayat 1993). Slides were viewed using an Olympus BX 51
(Olympus Global, Center Valley, PA, USA) compound
microscope and photographed using an Olympus DP 25 digi-
tal camera (Olympus Global). Select photographs were com-
piled into composite micrographs using Adobe Photoshop
CS5 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA). Select serial sec-
tions were photographed using a Canon EOS 50D digital
camera (Canon USA, Lake Success, NY, USA) with a 100-
mm macro lens for complete overviews. Slides were placed in
the OtagoMuseum where the specimens were obtained.
Results
The testes are suspended by the mesorchium into the pleuro-
peritoneal coelom posterior to the liver. Each testis is elon-
gated along its anteroposterior axis and flattened along its
dorsoventral axis, although overall shapes are highly variable
(A. Cree, pers. obs.). The testes are composed of seminiferous
tubules (Fig. 1A,B, St) that consist of a germinal epithelium
where germ cells develop; however, the germ cell development
strategy was unable to be determined owing to the inactive
state of the testes in the specimens used for this study. The
superficial covering of the testes is the visceral pleuroperito-
neum but posteriorly the ductus deferens, kidney, and ureter
are retroperitoneal. Deep to the serous covering of the testis is
a connective tissue sheath (Fig. 1A, Ct) homologous to the
tunica albuginea.
The seminiferous tubules, which react positively to Coo-
massie blue for proteins and react weakly to alcian blue at pH
2.5 for carboxylated glycosaminoglycans, merge into the rete
testis (Fig. 1, Rt) tubules intratesticularly prior to the rete tes-
tis exiting the testis proper at both the anterior and posterior
axes (results not shown), resulting in two main rete testis
tubules. The rete testis tubules are contained within a connec-
tive tissue sheath that is continuous with the tunica albuginea
(Fig. 1A,C,D, Ct) that Siegel et al. (2009) termed the epidid-
ymal sheath. The rete testis is composed of a simple squa-
mous epithelium (Fig. 1C, Rt) with basophilic nuclei,
eosinophilic cytoplasm, and positive reactions to protein stain-
ing. These tubules (Fig. 1D, Rt) divide before merging with
the ductuli efferentes (Fig. 1D, De).
The transition from the rete testis (Fig. 2A, Rt) to the
ductuli efferentes (Fig. 2A, De) is distinct as the epithelium
changes from simple squamous to simple cuboidal. The
nuclei are basophilic, but the cytoplasm is eosinophilic, which
reacts positively to protein staining, and multiple cilia
(Fig. 2A, Ci) can be seen protruding into the lumina of the
ductuli efferentes. The ductuli efferentes remain within the
connective tissue sheath (Fig. 2B, Ct) and extend posterior
alongside the epididymis (Fig. 2C, Ep). The ductuli efferen-
tes which can even be seen at the level of the kidney (Fig. 2D,
K), and ductus deferens (Fig. 2D, Dd), makes them the
longest (relatively) ductuli efferentes of any vertebrate studied
to date.
Although the ductuli efferentes can be seen at the level of
the ductus deferens, they appear to only merge with the
© 2012 The Authors
Acta Zoologica© 2012 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 455
Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 94: 454–461 (October 2013) Rheubert et al. � Reproductive morphology of S. punctatus
epididymis (Fig. 3A, Ep). The epididymis is encased in a thin
layer of smooth muscle (Fig. 3B,C, Sm) and consists of what
we believe is a pseudostratified epithelium, although the
condition of the specimens did not allow the observation of
basal cells. The epithelium reacts positively to Coomassie blue
for proteins but negatively to alcian blue for carboxylated
A B
C D
Fig. 1—Overview of the testis and rete testis tube.—A. The seminiferous tubule (St) of the testis merges with a rete testis tubule (Rt). The testis
and rete tubule are encapsulated within a connective tissue (Ct) sheath.—B.The rete testis (Rt) extends laterally from the testis. Seminiferous
tubule (St).—C. The rete testis (Rt) is composed of simple squamous epithelium and encapsulated in the connective tissue (Ct) sheath.—D.
The rete testis (Rt) divides into multiple ducts before merging with the ductuli efferentes (De). Connective tissue (Ct).
A B
C D
Fig. 2—Overview of the ductuli efferentes.—A. The rete testis tubule (Rt) merges with the ductuli efferentes (De), and the epithelium changes
from simple squamous to simple cuboidal with multiple cilia (Ci) extending into the lumen of the ductuli efferentes.—B. The ductuli efferentes
(De) remain within the connective tissue (Ct) sheath.—C. The ductuli efferentes (De) extend posterior in juxtaposition to the epididymis (Ep).
—D. The ductuli efferentes (De) extend posterior to the level of the kidney (K) near the ductus deferens (Dd).
© 2012 The Authors
Acta Zoologica© 2012 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences456
Reproductive morphology of S. punctatus � Rheubert et al. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 94: 454–461 (October 2013)
glycosaminoglycans. Superficial to the smooth muscle is a thin
layer of connective tissue (Fig. 3B,C, Ct) that appears to be
continuous with the visceral pleuroperitoneum. Sperm can be
found within the epididymis, although the testes are inactive
and no sperm are found within the rete testis and ductuli effer-
entes, suggesting the epididymis as a site for sperm storage. As
sperm progress posteriorly within the epididymis, they
become concentrated into spherical bundles (Fig. 3C, Sp)
with their heads oriented toward the center of the bundle
(Fig. 3D, Spz).
At the level of the kidney (Fig. 4A,K), the epididymis tran-
sitions into the ductus deferens (Fig. 2A, Dd). Within the
ductus deferens, sperm are tightly packed, and minimal free-
floating sperm are noticed. The ureter (Fig. 4A,B, Ur) of the
kidney is located lateral to the kidney opposite of the ductus
deferens (Fig. 4A, Dd), which runs along the medial side of
the kidney. Like in other vertebrates, the visceral layer of Bow-
man’s capsule (Fig. 4C, Bc) consists of flattened cells (podo-
cytes) investing the glomerulus (Fig. 4C, Gl). The proximal
convoluted tubule (Fig. 4C,D, Pct) extends from Bowman’s
capsule and consists of a simple cuboidal epithelium with cen-
tralized nuclei. The presence of a brush border was difficult to
ascertain owing to the poor fixation of the specimens. The
proximal convoluted tubule reacts positively to alcian blue at
pH 2.5 for carboxylated glycosaminoglycans. The proximal
convoluted tubule transitions into the distal convoluted tubule
(Fig. 4C, Dct), which consists of a simple columnar epithe-
lium with basal nuclei. The distal convoluted tubule drains
into the collecting duct (Fig. 4B, Cd), which consists of a
cuboidal to low columnar epithelium and contains debris
within the lumen. A sexual segment of the kidney is not
evident, lending support to the hypothesis of the absence of
the SSK in tuataras (see Discussion). All kidney tubules stain
positively with Coomassie blue for proteins and periodic acid
for neutral carbohydrates. But only the proximal convoluted
tubules (Fig. 4D, Pct) show a positive reaction to alcian blue
for carboxylated glycosaminoglycans (Fig. 4D).
The collecting duct (Fig. 5A, Cd) extends posteriorly
(Fig. 5A,B,K) to transition into the ureter outside of the kid-
ney (Fig. 5B, Ur). The ureter (Fig. 5B, Ur) opens into the
urodeum (Fig. 5C,D,E, Ud), and the ductus deferens
(Fig. 5C,D,E, Dd) remains dorsal to the urodeum. The kid-
ney (Fig. 5E,K) extends posteriorly to lie lateral to the urode-
um (Fig. 5E, Ud) as the ductus deferens (Fig. 5F, Dd) opens
into the urodeum (Fig. 5F, Ud) via an orifice in the roof of
the urodeum (Fig. 5F, Or). The presence of an ampulla duc-
tus deferentis, ampulla ureter, or ampulla urogenital papilla
(sensuTrauth and Sever 2011) was not observed.
Discussion
The epithelial structure of the testicular ducts resembles that
of other vertebrates studied to date and follows the synonymi-
zation of the nomenclature proposed by Sever (2010). The
rete testis exits the testis proper at two locations: anterior and
posterior. This overall structure resembles that of the echidna
A B
C D
Fig. 3—Overview of the epididymis.—A. The ductuli efferentes (De) merge with the epididymis (Ep), and all ducts remain within the connective
tissue (Ct) sheath.—B. The epididymis (Ep) is composed of a tall columnar epithelium, which appears pseudostratified. Connective tissue (Ct).
—C. Sperm bundles (Sp) can be found within the epididymis (Ep). Connective tissue (Ct), ductuli efferentes (De), smooth muscle (Sm).—D.
The sperm aggregate in a spherical fashion within the epididymis (Ep) with the heads facing the interior of the sphere (Spz).
© 2012 The Authors
Acta Zoologica© 2012 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 457
Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 94: 454–461 (October 2013) Rheubert et al. � Reproductive morphology of S. punctatus
(Djakiew and Jones 1981). The gross morphology shows that
two connective tissue sheaths, which the authors termed
gonadal ligaments, extend from the testis similar to that seen
in S. punctatus. Recent data suggest that in squamates, the
number of rete tubules exiting the testis is highly variable, and
no correlation has been observed between the number of rete
tubules and testicular size (Sever and Freeborn 2012). The
rete tubules originate intratesticularly, contrasting with the
observations made by Rheubert et al. (2010), in the gecko,
Hemidactylus turcicus. However, it appears that most squa-
mates have an intratesticular origin of the rete testis (J. L.
Rheubert, unpublished data).
The rete testis tubules are contained within an extension
of the connective tissue sheath covering the testis that (Siegel
et al. 2009) referred to as the epididymal sheath. Within the
sheath, the rete tubules divide into multiple ductuli efferentes,
which consist of a low cuboidal epithelium that is highly cili-
ated. This structure is consistent with observations made in
other amniotes (mammals, Ilio and Hess 1994; birds, Aire
2007; reptiles, Guerrero et al. 2004; Akbarsha et al. 2007;
and Rheubert et al. 2010). However, in the Tuatara, the duct-
uli efferentes extend posteriorly to the level of the kidney.
Thus, the ductuli efferentes are greatly elongated, which Gabe
and Saint Girons (1964) noted in their review of the testicular
ducts.
The ductuli efferentes merge with the epididymis along its
length. This differs from other vertebrates in which the ductuli
efferentes only merge with the anterior portion of the epididy-
mis (Rheubert et al. 2010). The epididymis is highly convo-
luted and possesses a secretory columnar epithelium
consistent with reports in other squamates (Dufaure and Saint
Girons 1984; Akbarsha et al. 2006; Sever and Freeborn
2012). The condition of the specimens did not allow observa-
tion of a pseudostratified epithelium (by presence of basal
cells), a feature that has been noted in all vertebrate species
studied to date (Hermo and Robaire 2001). Large amounts of
spermatozoa are observed within the epididymis, although the
testes were spermatogenically inactive, which suggests male
Tuatara are capable of sperm storage, at least for a short per-
iod of time. Fox (1977) suggests the epididymis as the sperm
storage site for lizards, which differ from snakes which store
sperm in the ductus deferens. The specimens observed in this
study could have recently ended their reproductive cycle, or
sperm could be stored within both the epididymis and ductus
deferens.
In contrast to squamates, the spermatozoa are arranged in
spherical bundles with their heads pointing toward the center
of the circle. This differs from previous descriptions of
sperm bundle organization in salamanders in which the heads
are all aligned (spermatophores) (Sperone et al. 2009) or
B
A
C D
Fig. 4—Overview of the kidney.—A. The kidney (K) is lobed, and the ureter (Ur) and ductus deferens (Dd) lie juxtapositioned to the kidney
proper contralateral to one another.—B. The collecting duct (Cd) is situated between the two lobes of the kidney proper.—C. Bowman’s capsule
(Bc) surrounds the glomerulus (Gl), and the proximal convoluted tubule (Pct) extends from Bowman’s capsule. The distal convoluted tubule
(Dct) extends from the proximal convoluted tubule (Pct).—D. The proximal convoluted tubule (Pct) is demarcated by staining positively with
alcian blue. Glomerulus (Gl).
© 2012 The Authors
Acta Zoologica© 2012 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences458
Reproductive morphology of S. punctatus � Rheubert et al. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 94: 454–461 (October 2013)
chondrichthyans in which the sperm are aligned on a single
plane with the heads directly facing one another (spermato-
zeugmata) (Moura et al. 2011), but resembles sperm bundle
organization in the Echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus (Djakiew
and Jones 1981). Although Djakiew and Jones (1981) did not
describe the organization of the sperm bundles in the
Echidna, our examination of their plates indicates that they
resemble those of the Tuatara. This organizational scheme
may aid in the transfer of spermatozoa in the absence of an
intromittent organ.
The epididymis transitions into the ductus deferens, which
extends lateral to the kidney. No morphological differences
between the epididymis and ductus deferens were observed in
these specimens (potentially owing to poor fixation) except
that the spermatozoa seem to be more densely packed with
fewer free-floating spermatozoa in the ductus deferens. Kid-
ney nephrons follow the usual vertebrate pattern of a glomeru-
lus surrounded by Bowman’s capsule, a proximal convoluted
tubule, distal convoluted tubule, and collecting ducts. The
morphology of the nephron resembles that of other verte-
brates with the exception of the presence of a brush border in
the proximal convoluted tubule. The brush border may have
been present, as light microscopy shows a conspicuous stain-
ing material at the luminal edge of the epithelium, but the fix-
ation quality limits the certainty of this interpretation. Gabe
and Saint Girons (1964) noted the presence of a brush border
A B
C D
E F
Fig. 5—Serial sagittal sections through the posterior region of the urogenital system.—A. The collecting duct (Cd) within the posterior end of the
kidney (K).—B. The ureter (Ur) exits the kidney (K) posteriorly.—C. The ductus deferens (Dd) lies anterior to the urodeum (Ud). Collecting
duct (Cd).—D. The ductus deferens (Dd) containing sperm (Sp) widens slightly but remains anterior to the urodeum (Ud).—E. The ductus
deferens (Dd) continues to widen slightly remaining anterior to the urodeum (Ud), and the kidney (K) extends lateral to the urodeum (Ud).—F.
The ductus deferens (Dd) containing mature sperm (Sp) opens into the urodeum (Ud) through a dorsal orifice (Or).
© 2012 The Authors
Acta Zoologica© 2012 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 459
Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 94: 454–461 (October 2013) Rheubert et al. � Reproductive morphology of S. punctatus
that was less definitive than in other reptilian species. The
presence of a sexual segment, which has been described in
every squamate species studied to date, was not observed.
Gabe and Saint Girons (1964) noted the absence of the sexual
segment but proposed this was because of the inactivity of
their specimens. The testes were inactive in the specimens
investigated in this study, but sperm were present in the testic-
ular ducts. Previous studies on squamates suggest that if
sperm are present in the testicular ducts, the SSK is hypertro-
phied. Rheubert et al. (2011) suggested this as the explanation
for the difference in hypertrophy duration between lizards and
snakes. As snakes exhibit long-term sperm storage, sperm are
found in the ductus deferens throughout the entire year, and
thus, the SSK is hypertrophied throughout the entire year. As
sperm are present in the testicular ducts and an SSK was
not observed in this or previous studies (Saint Girons and
Newman 1987), we reject the hypothesis of the presence of an
SSK in Sphenodon, which further suggests the SSK is a syna-
pomorphy for the Squamata.
The collecting duct of the kidney extends into the ureter,
which opens into the urodeum of the cloaca. The ductus def-
erens does not fuse with the ureter and empties into the urod-
eum separately. In snakes, considerable variation occurs in the
morphology of the distal ends of the ureters and ductus defer-
entia, but invariably a common urogenital papilla opens into
the cloaca (Siegel et al. 2012; Trauth and Sever 2011). A uro-
genital papilla was not observed in our specimens but was
reported by Osawa (1897) and (Robb 1977). A comparative
study of the distal ends of these ducts has not been made in
lizards.
Overall, the reproductive system of S. punctatus resembles
that of other vertebrates (especially squamates with the lack of
an anastomizing intratesticular rete testis), and the nomencla-
ture used for other vertebrates (Sever 2010) is deemed appro-
priate. Only two rete testis tubules exit the testis, which
preliminarily appears to reject the hypothesis suggested by
Volsøe (1944) who stated snakes contain the ancestral condi-
tion with multiple rete testis tubules exiting the testis; how-
ever, more data on a variety of taxa are needed. The ductuli
efferentes in Sphenodon are relatively longer than in any squa-
mate studied to date, extending posteriorly to the level of the
kidney. Sperm are condensed in the epididymis into packets
that are organized differently than other organizational
schemes observed in vertebrates except the Echidna. Distal
ends of the ureters and the ductus deferens enter the cloaca
separately, unlike the situation in snakes. The absence of the
SSK further suggests the SSK as a synapomorphy for the
Squamata.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Otago Museum for
access to preserved specimens, especially Lucy Rowe and
Cody Fraser for the endless help during the development of
this study. Sincere appreciation goes to KenMiller at the Uni-
versity of Otago for his help with photographic techniques.
We would also like to thank Amanda Fisher and the Histology
Unit, Department of Pathology, University of Otago, for help
with slide preparation as well as Anthony Wilmes, Stanley
Trauth, and an anonymous reviewer for their comments on
earlier drafts of the manuscript. This study was undertaken
following consultation with the Ngai Tahu Consultation
Committee of the University of Otago. Funding was provided
by the National Science Foundation Grant no. DEB-
0809831 to DMS. This work is dedicated to the memory of
Manfred Gabe and Hubert Saint Girons whose work on the
histology of the tuatara inspired ours.
References
Aire, T. A. 2007. Anatomy of the testis and male reproductive
tract. In: Jamieson, B. B. G. (Ed.): Reproductive Biology and
Phylogeny of Birds, pp. 37–113. Science Publishers, Enfield,
NH.
Akbarsha, M. A. andMeeran, M. M. 1995. Occurrence of ampulla in
the ductus deferens of the Indian garden lizard, Calotes versicolor
Daudin. – Journal of Morphology 225: 261–268.Akbarsha, M. A., Kadalmani, B. and Tamilarasan, V. 2006. Histolog-
ical variation along and ultrastructural organization of the epithe-
lium of the ductus epididymidis of the fan-throated lizard Sitana
ponticerianaCuvier. –Acta Zoologica 87: 181–196.Akbarsha, M. A., Kadalmani, B. and Tamilarasan, V. 2007. Efferent
ductules of the fan-throated lizard Sitana ponticeriana Cuvier: Light
and transmission electron microscopy study. – Acta Zoologica 88:
265–274.Aldridge, R. D., Jellen, B. C., Siegel, D. S. and Wisniewski, S. S.
2011. The sexual segment of the kidney. In: Aldridge, R. D. and
Sever, D. M. (Eds): Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of
Snakes, pp. 477–509. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Besson, A. A., Nelson, N. J., Nottingham, C. M. and Cree, A. 2012.
Is cool egg incubation temperature a limiting factor for the translo-
cation of tuatara to southern New Zealand. – New Zealand Journal
of Ecology 36: 90–99.Cree, A., Cockrem, J. F. and Guillette, L. J. 1992. Reproductive
cycles of male and female tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) on Ste-
phens Island, New Zealand. – Journal of Zoology 226: 199–217.Djakiew, D. and Jones, R. C. 1981. Structural differentiation of the
male genital ducts of the echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). – Journal
of Anatomy 132: 187–202.Dufaure, J. and Saint Girons, H. 1984. Histologie compare de l’epidi-
dyme et de ses secretions chez les reptiles (lezards et serpents).
– Archives d’anatomie Microscopique Morphologie Experimentale 73:
15–26.Evans, S. E. 2003. At the feet of the dinosaurs: The early history and
radiation of lizards. – Biological Reviews 78: 513–551.Fox, H. 1977. The urogenital system of reptiles. In: Gans, C. and
Parsons, T. S. (Eds): Biology of the Reptilia, vol. 6, pp. 1–57.Academic Press, London.
Gabe, M. and Saint Girons, H. 1964. Histologie de Sphenodon puncta-
tus. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique,
Paris, p. 146.
Guerrero, S. M., Calderon, M. L., de Perez, G. R. and Ramirez Pinil-
la, M. P. 2004. Morphology of the male reproductive duct system
of Caiman crocodilus (Crocodylia, Alligatoridae). – Annals of Anat-
omy 186: 235–245.
© 2012 The Authors
Acta Zoologica© 2012 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences460
Reproductive morphology of S. punctatus � Rheubert et al. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 94: 454–461 (October 2013)
Gunther, A. 1867. Contribution to the anatomy of Hatteria (Rhyncho-
cephalus, Owen). – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of
London 335: 193–205.Hayat, M. A. 1993. Stains and Cytochemical Methods. Plenum Pub-
lishing Corporation, New York, NY, p. 455.
Healy, J. M. and Jamieson, B. G.M. 1994. The ultrastructure of sper-
matogenesis and epididymal spermatozoa of the Tuatara Sphenodon
punctatus (Sphenodontida, Amniota). – Philosophical Transactions:
Biological Sciences 344: 187–199.Hermo, L. and Robaire, B. 2001. Epididymal cell types and their
functions. In: Robaire, B. and Hinton, B. T. (Eds): The Epididy-
mis: From Molecules to Clinical Practice, pp. 81–102. Plenum
Publishers, New York, NY.
Hogben, L. T. 1921. A preliminary account of the spermatogenesis of
Sphenodon. – Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, 1921: 341–352.
Holmes, H. J. and Gist, D. H. 2004. Excurrent duct system of the
male turtle Chrysemys picta. – Journal of Morphology 261: 312–322.Ilio, K. Y. and Hess, R. A. 1994. Structure and function of the ductuli
efferentes: A review. – Microscopic Research and Technique 29: 432–467.
Jones, R. C. 2001. Evolution of the vertebrate epididymis. In: Rob-
aire, B. and Hinton, B. T. (Eds): The Epididymis: FromMolecules
to Clinical Practice, pp. 11–34. Springer, New York, NY.
Moura, T., Serra-Pereira, B., Gordo, L. S. and Figueiredo, I. 2011.
Sperm storage in males and females of the deepwater shark Portu-
guese dogfish with notes on oviducal gland microscopic organiza-
tion. – Journal of Zoology 2: 1–10.Osawa, G. 1897. Beitrage zur Anatomie der Hatteria punctata. – Arch
Mikrosk 51: 481–691.Rest, J. S., Ast, J. C., Austin, C. C., Waddell, P. J., Tibbetts, E. A.,
Hay, J. M. and Mindell, D. P. 2003. Molecular systematics of
primary reptilian lineages and the tuatara mitochondrial genome. –Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 289–297.
Rheubert, J. L., Sever, D. M., Geheber, A. D. and Siegel, D. S. 2010.
Proximal testicular ducts of the Mediterranean gecko (Hemidactylus
turcicus). –Anatomical Record (Hoboken) 293: 2176–2192.
Rheubert, J. L., Murray, C. M., Siegel, D. S., Babin, J. and Sever, D.
M. 2011. The sexual segment of Hemidactylus turcicus and the evo-
lution of sexual segment location in squamata. – Journal of Morphol-
ogy 272: 802–813.Robb, J. 1977. The Tuatara. Meadowfield, Durham. p. 64.
Saint Girons, H. and Newman, D. G. 1987. The reproductive cycle
of the male tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus, on Stephens Island, New
Zealand. –New Zealand Journal of Zoology 14: 231–237.Sever, D. M. 2010. Ultrastructure of the reproductive system of the
black swamp snake (Seminatrix pygaea). VI. Anterior testicular
ducts and their nomenclature. – Journal of Morphology 271:
104–115.Sever, D. M. and Freeborn, L. R. 2012. Observations on the anterior
testicular ducts in snakes with emphasis on sea snakes and ultra-
structure in the yellow-bellied sea snake, Pelamis platurus. – Journal
of Morphology 273: 324–336.Siegel, D. S., Sever, D. M., Rheubert, J. L. and Gribbins, K. M.
2009. Reproductive biology of Agkistrodon piscivorus Lacepede
(Squamata, Serpentes, Viperidae, Crotalinae). – Herpetological
Monographs 23: 74–107.Siegel, D. S., Miralles, A., Trauth, S. E. and Aldridge, R. D. 2012.
The phylogenetic distribution and morphological variation of the
‘pouch’ in female snakes. – Acta Zoologica DOI: 10.1111/j.
1463-6395.2011.00514.x.
Sperone, E., Bonacci, A., Brunelli, E., Tripepi, S. and Jamieson, B.
2009. Male reproductive system in the Italian newt, Lissotriton itali-
cus (Peracca 1898) (Amphibia, Urodela): Ultrastructural and mor-
phological study with description of spermiogenesis, spermatozoon
and spermatophore. – Zoomorphology 128: 183–195.Trauth, S. E. and Sever, D. M. 2011. Male Urogenital Ducts and
Cloacal Anatomy. In: Aldridge, R. D. and Sever, D. M. (Eds):
Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Snakes, pp. 411–475.CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Volsøe, H. 1944. Structure and Seasonal Variation of the Male
Reproductive Organs of Vipera berus (L.). Spolia Zoologica Musei
Hauniensis V Skrigter, Univeritetets Zoologiske Museum, Køben-
havn.
© 2012 The Authors
Acta Zoologica© 2012 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 461
Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 94: 454–461 (October 2013) Rheubert et al. � Reproductive morphology of S. punctatus