Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 445 576 HE 033 150
AUTHOR Davenport, Richard; Daniels, Elaine; Jones, James; Kesseler,Roger; Mowrey, Merlyn
TITLE A Contemporary Matrix Approach to Defining SharedGovernance.
PUB DATE 2000-03-00NOTE 30p.; Paper prepared for the American Association of Higher
Education Conference (March 29, 2000).PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom (055) -- Reports - Descriptive (141)EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Administrative Organization; Administrator Role; Faculty
College Relationship; *Governance; Higher Education;*Matrices; *Participative Decision Making; Policy Formation;Student Role; Student School Relationship; Teacher Role
IDENTIFIERS Central Michigan University
ABSTRACTThis paper outlines a matrix approach to shared governance
developed at Central Michigan University (CMU), designed to help faculty andadministrators focus on specific decision areas and to define existing rolesmore clearly. The process began at CMU in spring 1998 with the formation ofan ad hoc committee on governance which surveyed faculty and administratorson the issue of campus governance. After completing its work, the committeepresented eight recommendations to the academic senate; these included: (1)
having the ad hoc committee serve as an implementation committee to devise aplan to operationalize recommended actions; (2) agreement on roles andresponsibilities of the Board of Trustees, administration, faculty, andstudents in shared governance; (3) improving communications; (4) establishinga team approach to planning and problem solving; (5) considering facultyinput to decision making; (6) retaining the current decision makingprocedures unless they were formally modified; (7) requiring decision makersto communicate their actions/decisions; and (8) providing the universitycommunity with on-going education regarding decision making policies andprocedures. Other sections in the paper cover discussions with and findingsof the various participants in shared governance; and explain the roles andresponsibilities matrix that was developed. The completed matrix is appended.(CH)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.
kA Contemporary Matrix Approach to
71-Defining Shared Governance
71- AAHE National Conferencer=)w March 29, 2000 (cancelled)
Facilitators: Dr. Richard Davenport, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs,
Central Michigan University. [email protected]
Dr. Elaine Daniels, Chair, Academic Senate; Assistant Professor,Management and Law, Central Michigan University.
Dr. James Jones, Professor and Department Chair, Foreign Languages,
Literatures and Cultures. [email protected]
Mr. Roger Kesseler, Board of Trustees, Central Michigan University.
Dr. Merlyn Mowrey, Associate Professor, Philosophy and Religion,
Central Michigan University. merlyn.e.mowrey(acmich.edu
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice of Educational Research and Improvement
EDU ATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)
This document has been reproduced asreceived from the person or organizationoriginating it.
Minor changes have been made toimprove reproduction quality.
Points of view or opinions stated in thisdocument do not necessarily representofficial OERI position or policy.
PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS
BEEN GRANTED BY
g Ca npt-TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
1
2
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
A Contemporary Matrix Approach toDefining Shared GovernanceAAHE National ConferenceMarch 29, 2000 (cancelled)
Facilitators: Dr. Richard Davenport, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs,Central Michigan University. [email protected]
Dr. Elaine Daniels, Chair, Academic Senate; Assistant Professor,Management and Law, Central Michigan [email protected]
Dr. James Jones, Professor and Department Chair, Foreign Languages,Literatures and Cultures. [email protected]
Mr. Roger Kesseler, Board of Trustees, Central Michigan University.dividend [email protected]
Dr. Merlyn Mowrey, Associate Professor, Philosophy and Religion,Central Michigan University. merlyn.e.mowreyecmich.edu
I. Abstract
An underlying problem for many institutions experiencing difficulties with shared governance is oftena lack of meaningful dialogue focused on differentiating the specific levels of involvement forstakeholders in decision-making on campuses. It is important to establish a process for open inquirythat is non-threatening, objective, inclusive, and one that culminates in an agreed upon operationaldefinition of shared governance and the roles played by each group. The fundamental premise of thematrix approach is that decision-makers can be led through a systematic process of examining areasof responsibility and decision making resulting in a functional document that will serve the institutionas a roadmap for shared governance. The matrix approach is a useful methodology to help facultyand administrators focus on specific decision areas and to define existing roles more clearly. It is notintended as a vehicle to solve basic differences of opinion regarding governance issues; however, theapproach can be useful in identifying areas of disagreement. The information presented in this paperprovides the reader with an explanation of how the matrix approach was developed involving severalkey stakeholders on campus
II. Senate Ad Hoc Committee on Governance
In the spring semester of 1998, the Committee began its study of governance by discussing andreviewing faculty and administrative perspectives on governance at CMU, current studies onuniversity governance, the "AGB Statement on Institutional Governance," and relevant reports andsurvey results which provided insight into the campus climate and issues related to governance. TheCommittee also conducted a brief and preliminary survey of all regular faculty and academicadministrators on the issue of campus governance. The findings were not statistically significant(only a 10% return). Nevertheless, the "snapshot" impressions disclosed in the responses didsupport the findings from an earlier NCA report, as well as previous reports and survey resultsdealing with governance issues on the CMU campus since 1994.
In the fall of 1998, the Committee arranged for a more thorough and timely survey designed withassistance from the Center for Applied Research and Rural Studies (CARRS). The response ratewas 93% of those contacted by CARRS, which was 66% of the targeted group. (CARRS was unableto reach all of those in the targeted group which consisted of 639 full time faculty and 37 senioradministrators and academic directors. Responses were obtained from 418 faculty and 28
3 1
administrators). Student input was also sought by focus group interviews with student leaders andfrom students' responses to relevant questions in the 1999 Institutional Student Survey.
Based on its work, the committee arrived at eight recommendations which it presented to theAcademic Senate on February 16, 1999. At the senate and in an open forum, suggestions weresolicited for the implementation of those recommendations. These suggestions were added to therecommendations, the background information and research findings and presented in a final SenateAd Hoc Committee on Governance Report in May 1999. As a result of the Committee's study anddeliberations over the past year, consensus was reached on the following recommendations:
1. The Ad Hoc Committee on Governance should serve as an Ad Hoc Governance ImplementationCommittee to devise and implement a plan to operationalize the recommendations set forthbelow.
2. Devise and agree on the current roles and responsibilities of the Board of Trustees,Administration, Academic Senate, faculty and students in shared governance.
3. Improve the communication environment in order to build mutual trust.
4. Establish a team approach to planning and problem-solving.
5. Solicit and consider faculty input before decisions are made that have a direct impact on theacademic area of the university.
6. Obtain commitment of the Board of Trustees and the Administration to adhere to current policiesand procedures governing decision-making until or unless they are formally modified.
7. Require decision-makers to communicate their actions/decisions with rationales related to themission of the university.
8. Provide on-going education for the university community regarding the agreed upon decision-making policies and procedures.
III. Implementation Committee on Governance
A. The members of the original Senate Ad Hoc Committee on Governance moved into thesecond stage of its work as the Ad Hoc Governance Implementation Committee.Beginning in the summer of 1999, committee members collected data on the variousparticipants in shared governance, i.e. the Board of Trustees, Administration, AcademicSenate, Faculty Association, and Students:
1. Board of Trustees
A Board of Trustees Workshop was held on July 8, 1999. One of the agenda items was areview of the Senate Ad Hoc Committee on Governance Report. The Report and itsrecommendations were endorsed by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees currentCharter and By-laws were reviewed for their roles and responsibilities. The authority retainedby the Board and the responsibilities delegated to others were identified and brought back tothe Implementation Committee by the Trustee representative. That information was thenincorporated into the "Roles and Responsibilities" Matrix.
The Board is currently in the process of reviewing and consolidating its Charter and Bylawsinto a single document. The ultimate goal is to document, codify, and harmonize the sharedgovernance roles and responsibilities of the university.
2
2. Administration
The Provost met with the Council of Deans to solicit input regarding the types of academicdecisions in which they are involved. The deans provided a long list of decision areas to beconsidered for inclusion into the matrix. Many of the decision areas recommended by thedeans are covered under the provisions of the union contract. The Provost's administrativestaff also provided input into the academic decision areas. The administrative groups werenot involved in the process beyond providing the initial input for the list of decision areas to beconsidered by the Ad Hoc Implementation Committee on Governance.
3. Academic Senate and Faculty Association
Three faculty committee members met throughout the summer to gather and reviewinformation relevant to the roles and responsibilities of the Academic Senate and FacultyAssociation. To identify the roles and responsibilities of the Academic Senate, the committeemembers examined the Academic Senate Constitution, Academic Senate Policies andProcedures, and the document entitled "Academic Senate Standing Committees and OtherCommittees to which the Senate Elects [Members]" which describes each committee and itscharge. To identify the roles and responsibilities of the Faculty Association, the 1996-1999Agreement of Central Michigan University and the CMU Faculty Association and the Lettersof Agreement were reviewed. These findings were incorporated into the matrix by theImplementation Committee.
4. Students
The information gathered during the first phase of this study of shared governance onstudents' roles identified both formal and informal ways that students participate ingovernance. Their formal roles are primarily established through the Academic Senate whichincludes student senators and student membership on most Senate Committees. Theseroles were identified and incorporated into the matrix. The Implementation Committeeacknowledged, however, that numerous informal and unofficial opportunities for students toinfluence decision making had been identified earlier that could not be appropriately includedin this matrix, nor did it match the charge of this committee to attempt to treat that informationin some other way. It does seems clear, however, that the next phase of this work on sharedgovernance will offer an appropriate opportunity to make more effective use of the findings onstudents' opportunities for participation.
B. Roles and Responsibilities Matrix
1. Selection of a Matrix Format
The Committee was challenged by the task of organizing and presenting the data it hadgathered in such a way that it would give a clear, thorough, and useful representation of howshared governance currently works at CMU. The goal was to identify the full range ofparticipation in decision-making across a wide range of the kinds of decisions that constitute"shared governance." There are, of course, numerous responsibilities that rest solely with theBoard of Trustees. There are also numerous responsibilities which the Board has delegated,in whole or in part, to other stakeholders. There are still other responsibilities that restequally with the Board and other stakeholders. Thus, shared governance involves an oftencomplex kind of decision-making that is not easily explained. To describe it accuratelyrequires that the various decisions-making responsibilities be identified for each decision andfor all of the relevant stakeholders. A matrix format was chosen as the clearest way toorganize and present the detailed and complicated array of information.
53
2. General Categories of Responsibilities/Decisions
a. Reserved to Board of Trustees
Policies, procedures and other decisions reserved to the Board alone or in consultationwith select senior administrators.
b. Administrative
Policies, procedures, and other decisions applicable to the general management of theuniversity at all levels.
c. Personnel
Policies, procedures, and other decisions related to employment and performance ofduties as members of the faculty, staff, and administration.
d. Curricular
Policies, procedures and other decisions related to academic programs and theteaching/learning process.
3. Stakeholders
Board of TrusteesPresidentProvostAdministration / Senior StaffAcademic SenateSenate Executive BoardSenate CommitteesSenate Representatives to Non-Senate committees such asthe Academic Planning CouncilCollege which may specify deans, college faculty, Dean's Advisory Council, facultyrepresentatives of the college on various committees, or the college of ExtendedLearningDepartment or Academic UnitCMUFAStudentsOther There are outside participants (beyond the stakeholders internal to the institutionidentified in the grid) that may influence decision-making. Such entries on the matrixinclude the State of Michigan, College of Extended Learning, Arbitrators, Faculty FormalHearing Committee, and CMU Development Board.
4. Decision Making Responsibilities
A Approves/RatifiesNetoesD Decides (this is the final decision when no "A" (Approval) is
indicated)R Recommends/Formal InputC Consults/Informal inputI Is informed of a decision made by someone elseM Representative voting member
6 4
SH
AR
ED
GO
VE
RN
AN
CE
11
Res
pons
ibili
ties
Cam
pus
Dec
isio
n M
aker
sT
rust
ees
Pre
side
ntP
rovo
st'A
dmin
.A
cade
mS
enat
eS
enat
eS
enat
eI
Col
lege
Dep
t or
CM
UF
AS
tude
nts
Oth
er
(Sen
ior
Sen
ate
Exe
cC
omm
reps
to n
onA
cade
m.
Sta
ff)B
oard
Sen
ate
Com
mU
nit
Par
ticip
ants
in D
ecis
ion
Mak
ing
AA
OA
ffirm
ativ
e A
ctio
n O
ffice
rA
SA
cade
mic
Sen
ate
AP
CA
cade
mic
Pla
nnin
g C
ounc
ilA
rbA
rbitr
atio
nA
dvU
nive
rsity
Adv
ance
men
t Div
isio
nB
OT
Boa
rd o
f Tru
stee
sB
us &
Fin
Bus
ines
s an
d F
inan
ce D
ivis
ion
CA
DC
urric
ular
Aut
horit
y D
ocum
ent
CM
U A
dmin
istr
atio
n (f
or th
e pu
rpos
es o
f thi
s do
cum
ent)
CM
UC
MU
FA
Fac
ulty
Ass
ocia
tion
(Uni
on)
CO
DC
ounc
il of
Dea
nsC
ol C
mC
olle
ge C
omm
ittee
Col
Fac
Col
lege
Fac
ulty
Dea
ns A
dvis
ory
Cou
ncil
DA
CD
ev B
dD
evel
opm
ent B
oard
FF
HC
Fac
ulty
For
mal
Hea
ring
Com
mitt
eeF
c R
ev C
mF
acul
ty R
evie
w C
omm
ittee
FP
SF
acul
ty P
erso
nnel
Ser
vice
sO
ther
All
othe
r st
akeh
olde
rs n
ot li
sted
P &
T C
mP
rom
otio
n an
d T
enur
e C
omm
ittee
SG
AS
tude
nt G
over
nmen
t Ass
ocia
tion
Dec
isio
n M
akin
g R
espo
nsib
ility
Lev
els
AA
ppro
ves/
Rat
ifies
Net
oes
DD
ecid
es (
this
is th
e fin
al d
ecis
ion
whe
n no
"A
" (A
ppro
val)
is in
dica
ted)
RR
ecom
men
ds/F
orm
al In
put
CC
onsu
lts/In
form
al In
put
IIs
info
rmed
of a
dec
isio
n m
ade
by s
omeo
ne e
lse
MR
epre
sent
ativ
e vo
ting
mem
ber
Not
e.
Pre
side
nt a
nd P
rovo
st in
clud
ed in
Adm
in. (
Sen
ior
Sta
ff)
SH
AR
ED
GO
VE
RN
AN
CE
2
Res
pons
ibili
ties
Cam
pus
Dec
isio
n M
aker
sT
rust
ees
Pre
side
ntP
rovo
stA
dmin
.A
cade
mS
enat
e I S
enat
eS
enat
eI
Col
lege
Dep
t or
CM
UF
AS
tude
nts
IO
ther
(Sen
ior
I Sen
ate
Exe
cI C
omm
reps
to n
onA
cade
m.
Sta
ff)I
Boa
rdS
enat
e C
omm
Uni
t
A.
DE
CIS
ION
S R
ES
ER
VE
D T
O B
OA
RD
OF
TR
US
TE
ES
i
1A
sses
smen
t of B
oard
's p
erfo
rman
ce (
self
audi
t)D
2A
sses
smen
t of P
resi
dent
's p
erfo
rman
ceD
3A
udito
r ap
poin
tmen
t (ou
tsid
e au
dito
r)D
R
4A
udit
annu
al r
epor
t, ac
cept
ance
D
5B
udge
t, F
inan
cial
man
agem
ent a
nd fi
duci
ary
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
DR
C
6C
OLL
EC
TIV
E B
AR
GA
ININ
G
Lu
.7
BE
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
6a 6b 6c 6d*
6e 7 8 9* 10*
11*
12 13
Set
ting
CM
U p
aram
eter
sD
R
CM
U te
am s
elec
tion
DC
Rea
chin
g te
ntat
ive
agre
emen
t (co
ntra
ct)
DR
D/C
D/C
oth
er u
nion
s
CM
U/F
A C
olle
ctiv
e B
arga
inin
g A
gree
men
tsA
DA
/D
Oth
er C
olle
ctiv
e B
arga
inin
g A
gree
men
tsA
DR
D/A
oth
er u
nion
s
Boa
rd o
f Tru
stee
s ch
arte
r an
d by
law
sD
Com
pens
atio
n of
the
Pre
side
ntD
Con
trac
ting
Aut
horit
y P
olic
y, c
reat
ion/
revi
sion
of
DR
CC
Deg
rees
, con
ferr
ing
ofA
DR
R (
Reg
istr
ar)
Deg
rees
, hon
orar
yA
DC
Dev
elop
men
t Boa
rd b
ylaw
s, a
ppro
val
AD
D (
Dev
Bd)
End
owm
ents
, gra
nts
and
gifts
, dec
isio
ns r
elat
ing
to (
DeB
ruin
/end
note
)D
RC
14In
stitu
tiona
l ind
epen
denc
e, p
rese
rvat
ion
D
15In
terc
olle
giat
e pr
ogra
ms,
pol
icie
sD
RC
D/N
CA
A R
ules
16In
vest
men
t pol
icie
sD
RC
17Le
ase
auth
oriz
atio
n (o
ver
one
yr. i
n le
ngth
)A
D
18N
amin
g of
faci
litie
s an
d m
emor
ials
DR
19S
ale/
Pur
chas
e of
rea
l pro
pert
y, a
utho
rizat
ion
AD
20T
raffi
c fin
es a
nd p
enal
ties,
app
rova
lD
RC
21T
uitio
n an
d ge
nera
l stu
dent
fees
affe
ctin
g at
leas
t 50%
of s
tude
nt b
ody
DR
C
22U
nive
rsity
's m
issi
on s
tate
men
tN
DR
RR
cR
CM
23*
Uni
vers
ity's
long
term
str
ateg
ic p
lann
ing
AID
24U
nive
rsity
's v
isio
n st
atem
ent a
nd o
bjec
tives
ND
RC
CC
C_C
(Dea
nsC
*End
note
s-
line
#
A 6
d
A 9
Agr
eem
ents
rea
ched
at t
he b
arga
inin
g ta
ble
are
subj
ect t
o ra
tific
atio
n by
bot
h th
e C
MU
Boa
rd o
f Tru
stee
s an
d th
e C
MU
FA
Boa
rd o
f Dire
ctor
s. F
or th
isre
ason
, an
"A"
appe
ars
on th
e gr
id u
nder
Boa
rd o
f Tru
stee
s, "
D"
appe
ars
unde
r pr
esid
ent,
and
a "N
D"
appe
ars
in th
e C
MU
FA
col
umn.
A c
ontr
act i
s an
y ag
reem
ent b
etw
een
the
Uni
vers
ity a
nd a
noth
er p
arty
, whi
ch is
enf
orce
able
at l
aw. T
he B
oard
of T
rust
ees,
und
er B
oard
pol
icy,
del
egat
es th
eau
thor
ity to
exe
cute
con
trac
ts to
oth
ers
and
requ
ires
that
som
e co
ntra
cts
be a
ppro
ved
by th
e B
oard
itse
lf.
9
EST
CO
PY A
VA
ILA
BL
E
10
*End
note
s-
line
#3
A 1
0B
oth
Sen
ate
and
Boa
rd p
olic
ies
stat
e th
at th
e B
oard
rat
ifies
the
list o
f gra
duat
es th
at h
as b
een
cert
ified
by
the
regi
stra
r an
d ac
cept
ed b
y th
eA
cade
mic
Sen
ate.
Acc
ordi
ng to
act
ual p
ract
ice,
how
ever
, the
selis
ts a
re n
ot b
eing
sen
t to
the
Sen
ate
for
its a
ccep
tanc
e.
In r
ecen
t yea
rs, H
onor
ary
Deg
ree
reci
pien
ts h
ave
been
sel
ecte
d by
the
pres
iden
t with
the
appr
oval
of t
he B
oard
of T
rust
ees.
The
pre
side
nt n
o lo
nger
form
ally
invi
tes
or in
volv
es S
enat
epa
rtic
ipat
ion,
alth
ough
the
Sen
ate
cons
titut
ion
stat
es th
at th
e S
enat
e "w
ill r
ecom
men
d ca
ndid
ates
for
hono
rary
deg
rees
." In
the
past
, rec
omm
enda
tions
wer
e m
ade
thro
ugh
the
Tru
stee
/Fac
ulty
Lia
ison
Com
mitt
ee.
The
re h
as b
een
a lo
ngst
andi
ng p
ract
ice
for
the
Uni
vers
ity p
resi
dent
to h
ave
an a
dvis
ory
body
whi
ch in
volv
ed S
enat
e re
pres
enta
tion.
The
Uni
vers
ity P
lann
ing
Com
mis
sion
ope
rate
d as
an a
dvis
ory
body
toP
resi
dent
Pla
chta
who
cha
ired
it. T
he A
cade
mic
Sen
ate
chai
rper
son,
alo
ng w
ith tw
o st
uden
ts (
one
elec
ted
by S
GA
and
one
app
oint
ed b
y th
e pr
esid
ent)
and
two
facu
lty r
epre
sent
ativ
es s
elec
ted
by th
epr
esid
ent s
erve
d on
this
bod
y in
an
info
rmal
cap
acity
, alo
ng w
ith s
ever
al u
nive
rsity
adm
inis
trat
ors
and
staf
f. A
fter
not c
allin
g a
mee
ting
for
over
a y
ear,
the
pres
iden
t for
mal
ly d
isba
nded
the
Com
mis
sion
in
July
199
9.
A 1
1
A23
/820
113E
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
12
Res
pons
ibili
ties
Cam
pus
Dec
isio
n M
aker
s4
Tru
stee
sP
resi
dent
Pro
vost
Adm
in.
Aca
dem
Sen
ate
Sen
ate
Sen
ate
Col
lege
ID
ept o
rC
MU
FA
Stu
dent
sO
ther
(Sen
ior
Sen
ate
Exe
cC
omm
reps
to n
onA
cade
mS
taff)
IB
oard
Sen
ate
Com
mU
nit
B.
AD
MIN
IST
RA
TIV
E M
AT
TE
RS
1A
CA
DE
MIC
DIV
ISIO
N A
LLO
CA
TIO
N O
F R
ES
OU
RC
ES
1aD
ivis
iona
l res
ourc
es, a
lloca
tion
ofD
R/C
C (
Dea
n)
1bC
olle
ge r
esou
rces
, allo
catio
n of
D (
Dea
n), C
(D
AC
)
lcD
epar
tmen
tal r
esou
rces
, allo
catio
n of
2A
CA
DE
MIC
DIV
ISIO
N S
TR
AT
EG
IC P
LAN
NIN
G (
SE
E A
LSO
Dl&
D4)
2aD
ivis
iona
lC
CC
CC
2b*
2C*
3 3a
Col
lege
C
D (
Dea
n),
R/C
(DA
C)
Dep
artm
ent/A
cade
mic
uni
tC
(D
ean)
D/R
AC
AD
EM
IC O
RG
AN
IZA
TIO
N A
ND
NA
ME
CH
AN
GE
, PO
LIC
YA
men
d D
olic
AM
3b 4' 4a 4b 4c 4d 5
App
licat
ion
BU
DG
ET
Bud
get r
estr
uctu
ring
com
mitt
eeB
udge
t Rev
iew
Com
mitt
eeN
ew in
itiat
ives
bud
get r
eque
sts
(Aca
dem
ic D
ivis
ion)
Cap
ital p
roje
cts
Cha
rter
ed s
choo
ls, a
utho
rizat
ion
of
D A
R o 0 0
II
:R
j
DF
t(C
luar
ay &
Bud
get C
omm
)
RR
RR
RR
(Exe
c D
r)
t I
I
LI (
AP
C) R
(D
ean)
. IA
(AP
C)
D (
EN
S D
ean)
Ft(
Oua
lity
Et B
udge
t Com
m)
6' 7 7a /b 7 c
Col
lege
goa
ls, d
evel
opm
ent o
f
BU
DG
ET
New
initi
ativ
es a
nd p
rogr
am d
egre
es o
ver
$100
,000
Cap
ital p
roje
cts
over
$10
0.00
0
Col
lege
ope
ratin
g bu
dget
, man
agem
ent o
f
A0
1A
rCI
RR
IC
ICI
I1 I
I
D (
Dea
n) I
R C
()D
AC
)I
C
C (
Dea
n)
1C D
(D
AC
DIC
(C
hairs
)!I
1
8*C
olle
ge p
roce
dure
s (f
orm
al),
dev
elop
men
t of
D (
Dea
n)R
(D
AC
)R
or
C
9*D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T B
YLA
WS
9aw
Con
trac
t pro
visi
ons
rega
rdin
gA
RD
/A
9bC
reat
ion/
revi
sion
sN
RC
R (
Dea
n)D
10F
EE
S10
aF
ees,
stu
dent
tech
nolo
gy (
allo
catio
n of
rev
enue
)M
Tec
h P
lann
ing
Bd
10b
Fee
s, g
ener
al c
ours
e-re
late
d (e
stab
lishm
ent o
f)A
/CD
RR
(D
ean)
R
12P
BS
12a
Fun
ding
A
12b
Pro
gram
sch
edul
ing
DC
IC
'See
end
note
s
Res
pons
ibili
ties
Cam
pus
Dec
isio
n M
aker
s5
Tru
stee
sP
resi
dent
Pro
vost
Adm
in.
Aca
dem
Sen
ate
Sen
ate
Sen
ate
Col
lege
Dep
t or
CM
UF
AS
tude
nts
Oth
er
(Sen
ior
Sen
ate
Exe
cC
omm
reps
to n
onA
cade
m.
Sta
ff)B
oard
Sen
ate
Com
mU
nit
B.
AD
MIN
IST
RA
TIV
E M
AT
TE
RS
- c
ontin
ued
II
13S
EN
AT
E C
OM
MIT
TE
ES
13aw
Sel
ectio
n of
rep
rese
ntat
ives
R (
Cm
on
Com
mI
cC
(S
GA
), /M
Ex
Offi
cio
1313
"A
ctio
n on
rep
orts
/rec
omm
enda
tions
CD
CR
/DI
M14
Sen
ate
Con
stitu
tion,
cha
nges
toA
RR
D/R
(F
ac)
M15
Sen
ate
polic
ies
rela
ting
to fa
culty
RD
RR
M16"
Stu
dent
s, A
cade
mic
Pol
icie
sR
DR
M17
Stu
dent
s' R
ight
s, R
espo
nsib
ilitie
s, a
nd D
isci
plin
ary
Pro
cedu
res,
Cod
e of
AM
18T
echn
olog
y P
lann
ing
Boa
rdA
DI
I R (
Dea
n)C
C (
Bus
&F
in, A
dv. R
eps)
13B
ES
T C
OP
Y A
VA
ILA
BLE
14
19'
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
CA
LEN
DA
R, C
ON
TR
AC
T P
RO
VIS
ION
SI
II
II
I
119
aC
lass
tim
es/d
ays:
Art
. 23,
par
ag. 1
AD
RI
RI
RI
IM
19b
Art
. 23,
par
ag. 3
.f.O
ther
: AA
DI
IA
/D
w20
Uni
vers
ity P
lann
ing
Com
mis
sion
DC
CI
CM
I
*End
note
s-lin
e#
B 1
/D1
B 1
b/B
1c
B 4
B 2
b, 2
c6,
8
B 9
B 9
a
The
Aca
dem
ic P
lann
ing
Cou
ncil
(AP
C),
an
advi
sory
bod
y to
the
prov
ost,
revi
ews
and
the
dean
s pr
ovid
e fo
rmal
inpu
t via
bal
lotin
g on
var
ious
pro
posa
ls. T
he o
pera
ting
Impl
emen
tatio
n pl
ans
shou
ld b
e in
clud
ed w
ith n
ew in
itiat
ive
prop
osal
s. T
he im
plem
enta
tion
curr
icul
ar a
ppro
val p
roce
ss.
The
re is
no
unifo
rm p
roce
ss a
mon
g th
e co
llege
s, n
or a
mon
g de
part
men
ts/u
nits
Bud
get r
estr
uctu
ring'
s po
tent
ial i
mpa
ct o
n ac
adem
ic q
ualit
y an
d ex
celle
nce
is th
e(p
age
82).
Und
er it
s te
rms,
a jo
int c
omm
ittee
(Q
ualit
y an
d B
udge
t Com
mitt
ee)
Res
truc
turin
g C
omm
ittee
is to
sha
re r
elev
ant i
nfor
mat
ion
(as
spec
ified
in th
e A
gree
men
t)
The
re is
no
unifo
rm p
roce
ss a
mon
g th
e va
rious
col
lege
s. T
he d
egre
e of
facu
lty
Dep
artm
ent b
ylaw
s ar
e re
quire
d un
der
a co
ntra
ct p
rovi
sion
of t
he A
gree
men
t bet
wee
nap
prov
al b
y th
e re
leva
nt d
ean
and
the
prov
ost.
The
dea
n an
d th
e pr
ovos
t may
als
oT
he c
riter
ia a
rtic
ulat
ed in
the
Agr
eem
ent a
nd th
e st
anda
rds
artic
ulat
ed in
dep
artm
ent
prom
otio
n. In
add
ition
, dep
artm
ent b
ylaw
s an
d pr
oced
ures
det
erm
ine,
to a
gre
atse
lect
ion
of th
e de
part
men
t cha
irper
son,
facu
lty te
achi
ng a
nd w
orkl
oad
assi
gnm
ents
,
Con
trac
t pro
visi
ons
refe
r to
topi
cs c
over
ed b
y th
e A
gree
men
t bet
wee
n C
MU
and
acad
emic
pro
gram
s, a
ccre
dita
tion
polic
ies
and
proc
edur
espl
an o
f a c
urric
ular
with
in c
olle
ges.
Cer
tain
con
ditio
ns
subj
ect o
f a le
tter
of a
gree
men
tm
ay s
tudy
and
mak
e re
com
men
datio
nsw
ith th
e jo
int c
omm
ittee
inpu
t var
ies
from
col
lege
to
CM
U a
nd th
e C
MU
FA
.re
com
men
d ch
ange
s fo
rpr
oced
ures
exc
lusi
veex
tent
, the
inte
rnal
gov
erna
nce
depa
rtm
ent c
omm
ittee
the
CM
UF
A. T
opic
s te
ntat
ivel
yfo
r th
e P
resi
dent
and
an
"R"
(not
ed o
n th
e gr
id w
ith a
nin
the
CM
UF
A c
olum
n.
repo
rts,
of th
e A
PC
prop
osal
may
betw
een
in a
colle
ge.
Dep
artm
ents
depa
rtm
ent
in g
over
ning
of th
est
ruct
ures
,
agre
ed
and
othe
r ne
w in
itiat
ives
for
poss
ible
are
dete
rmin
ed b
y th
e pr
ovos
t and
may
invo
lve
reso
urce
impl
icat
ions
be s
peci
fied
by th
e pr
ovos
t and
/or
dean
.
CM
U a
nd th
e C
MU
FA
and
is c
onta
ined
rela
ted
to q
ualit
y vs
. cos
ts. I
n ad
ditio
n,tim
ely
man
ner,
so
as to
allo
w in
put p
rior
deve
lop
thei
r ow
n "p
roce
dure
s,co
nsid
erat
ion
durin
g th
e cr
eatio
n or
all r
ecom
men
datio
ns a
nd d
ecis
ions
depa
rtm
ent/u
nit a
nd m
ay c
over
a w
ide
and
the
votin
g m
embe
rshi
p of
the
depa
rtm
ent
upon
by
the
barg
aini
ng te
ams
are
indi
cate
dfo
r th
e pr
ovos
t and
the
seni
or a
dmin
istr
atio
nth
e C
MU
Boa
rd o
f Tru
stee
s an
d th
e
fund
ing.
are
subj
ect
whi
ch a
re in
the
adm
inis
trat
ive
to im
plem
entin
g
crite
ria,
revi
sion
rega
rdin
gra
nge
Six
faxu
lty S
enat
e re
pres
enta
tives
to c
hang
e at
the
disc
retio
n of
the
prov
ost.
disc
usse
d by
the
Aca
dem
ic S
enat
e
the
1999
- 2
002
Agr
eem
ent
Bud
get
cert
ain
reco
mm
enda
tions
.
stan
dard
s, a
nd b
ylaw
s su
bjec
t to
proc
ess
(as
spec
ified
in th
e A
gree
men
t).
reap
poin
tmen
t, te
nure
, and
of to
pics
, e.g
. sel
ectio
n of
new
facu
lty,
for
vario
us p
urpo
ses.
on th
e gr
id b
y a
"D"
in th
ei
CM
UF
A c
olum
n (r
epre
sent
ing
the
CM
UF
A b
arga
inin
g te
am),
whi
le a
"D
" ap
pear
sap
TI)
e ar
s
"A")
by
both
(CM
U b
arga
inin
gte
am).
Agr
eem
ents
rea
ched
at t
he b
arga
inin
g ta
ble
are
then
sub
ject
to r
atifi
catio
nth
is r
easo
n, a
n "A
" ap
pear
s on
the
grid
und
er B
oard
of T
rust
ees
and
a "D
/A"
appe
ars
CM
UF
A B
oard
of D
irect
ors.
For
I
15.1
7ST
CO
PYA
VA
ILA
BL
E16
End
note
s -li
ne 6
6
B 1
3aS
enat
e co
mm
ittee
s m
ay b
e st
andi
ng o
r ad
hoc
. A s
enat
e-ap
prov
ed c
harg
e sp
ecifi
es e
ach
com
mitt
ee's
com
posi
tion
and
the
met
hod
(mos
t ofte
n se
nate
ele
ctio
n) b
y w
hich
mem
bers
are
sele
cted
.A
lmos
t all
com
mitt
ees
incl
ude
facu
lty m
embe
rs. M
ost i
nclu
de s
tude
nts
and
adm
inis
trat
ors
(ilda
), b
y pr
ovos
t app
oint
men
t, an
d/or
rep
rese
ntin
g pa
rtic
ular
gro
ups)
. A fe
w in
clud
e al
umni
or
mem
bers
of th
e la
rger
com
mun
ity.
B 1
3bA
sen
ate-
appr
oved
cha
rge
spec
ifies
eac
h co
mm
ittee
's r
espo
nsib
ility
and
aut
horit
y. S
ubje
ct to
app
eal,
com
mitt
ees
mak
e so
me
final
dec
isio
ns. O
n m
any
issu
es c
omm
ittee
s m
ake
reco
mm
enda
tions
to th
eA
cade
mic
Sen
ate
whi
ch m
ay th
en ta
ke fo
rmal
act
in o
n th
ese
reco
mm
enda
tions
. If a
ppro
ved.
som
e m
ay m
ike
furt
her
appr
oval
by
othe
rs s
uch
as th
e pr
ovos
t, pr
esid
ent.
BO
T. a
nd in
lim
ited
case
s
the
CM
UF
A.
B 1
6A
cade
mic
pol
icie
s re
latin
g to
stu
dent
s ar
e pu
blis
hed
in th
e C
MU
Bul
letin
. Tho
se w
hich
the
Sen
ate
has
crea
ted/
revi
sed
incl
ude.
alth
ough
are
not
lim
ited
to. t
he fo
llow
ing:
Mis
sed
Cla
ss P
olic
y, c
redi
t/no
cred
it op
tions
. Stu
dent
Gra
de G
rieva
nce
Pol
icy.
Stu
dent
Cur
ricul
ar A
ppea
l Pro
cess
.
B 1
9U
nive
rsity
cal
enda
r ch
ange
s, u
nder
the
Agr
eem
ent .
may
be
subj
ect t
o ne
gotia
tions
bet
wee
n C
MU
and
the
CM
UF
A, i
f the
cha
nge,
for
exam
ple,
affe
cts
the
star
tinga
nd/o
r en
ding
dat
es o
f the
fall
or s
prin
g se
mes
ters
. sum
mer
ses
sion
s, o
r of
ficia
l uni
vers
ity r
eces
ses.
Oth
er c
hang
es in
volv
ing
only
cla
ss ti
mes
or
days
are
sub
ject
to d
iscu
ssio
n an
d re
com
men
datio
n by
the
Aca
dem
ic S
enat
e.C
MU
mus
t giv
e du
e w
eigh
t to
Sen
ate
reco
mm
enda
tions
prio
r to
impl
emen
ting
any
chan
ges.
B 2
0/A
23
The
re h
as b
een
a lo
ng s
tand
ing
prac
tice
for
the
Uni
vers
ity p
resi
dent
to h
ave
an a
dvis
ory
body
whi
ch in
volv
ed S
enat
e re
pres
enta
tion
The
Uni
vers
ity P
lann
ing
Com
mis
sion
ope
rate
das
an
advi
sory
bod
y to
Pre
side
nt P
lach
ta w
ho c
haire
d it.
The
Aca
dem
ic S
enat
e ch
airp
erso
n, a
long
with
two
stud
ents
(on
e el
ecte
d by
SG
A a
nd o
ne a
ppoi
nted
by
the
pres
iden
t) a
nd tw
ofa
culty
rep
rese
ntat
ives
sel
ecte
d by
the
pres
iden
t ser
ved
on th
is b
ody
in a
n in
form
al c
apac
ity, a
long
with
sev
eral
uni
vers
ity a
dmin
istr
ator
s an
d st
aff.
Afte
r no
t cal
ling
a m
eetin
g fo
r ov
er a
yea
r.th
e pr
esid
ent f
orm
ally
dis
band
ed th
e C
omm
issi
on in
July
199
9.
17
BE
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
Res
pons
ibili
ties
Cam
pus
Dec
isio
n M
aker
sT
rust
ees
Pre
side
nt P
rovo
st;
Adm
inA
cade
m S
enat
eS
enat
eS
enat
e1
Col
lege
1D
ept o
rC
MU
FA
IS
tude
nts
!O
ther
(Sen
ior
Sen
ate
Exe
cI C
omm
reps
to n
onj A
cade
m.
Sta
rt)
hi
Boa
rd I
I Sen
ate
Com
mI
Uni
tC
.P
ER
SO
NN
EL
MA
TT
ER
SI
II
II
AD
MIN
IST
RA
TIV
E S
EN
IOR
OF
FIC
ER
S. A
PP
OIN
TM
EN
T/S
ELE
CT
ION
I
1a*
Pre
side
nt
ktI
(Adm
in.
Rep
)
Ii.4
IlCna
iran
dC
hau
Ele
ct)
M
(Uni
vers
ity C
omm
)IA
(Alu
mni
Rep
)M
(Can
mun
ity R
ep)
R (
Sae
enin
g C
m)
R (
Sas
enin
g C
m)
R (
Scr
eeni
ng C
m)
R (
Scr
eeni
ng C
m)
lbP
rovo
st a
nd V
ice
Pre
side
nt fo
r A
cade
mic
Adm
inis
trat
ion
j0
c 1.4
IA
CI
C
Al (
Oth
erde
ans)
(Fac
Rep
s)
M
j
lcD
eans
DR
IdO
ther
aca
dem
ic s
enio
r of
ficer
sI
DR
II
LI
leO
ther
non
-aca
dem
ic o
ffice
rsI
DR
1I
II
2A
DM
INIS
TR
AT
IVE
SE
NIO
R O
FF
ICE
RS
. AS
SE
SS
ME
NT
OF
II
II
I2a 2b 2c 2d
"2e 2f 2g 2h 2i 2j 2k 21 2m 2n 2o 2p
Pre
side
ntS
enio
r O
ffice
rs fo
r P
resi
dent
's O
ffice
(A
thle
tics.
Cam
pus
Out
reac
hP
rovo
st a
nd V
ice
Pre
side
nt fo
r A
cade
mic
Affa
irsD
eans
Ass
ocia
te D
eans
Ass
ista
nt V
ice
Pre
side
nt fo
r A
cade
mic
Affa
irsA
ssis
tant
Vic
e P
resi
dent
for
Aca
dem
ic A
dmin
istr
atio
nA
ssis
tant
Vic
e P
resi
dent
for
Cur
ricul
um a
nd A
sses
smen
tA
ssis
tant
Vic
e P
resi
dent
for
Info
rmat
ion
Tec
hnol
ogy
Ass
ista
nt V
ice
Pre
side
nt fo
r In
stitu
tiona
l Div
ersi
tyS
peci
al A
ssis
tant
to th
e P
resi
denV
Det
roit
Out
reac
hV
ice
Pre
side
nt a
nd C
hief
Fin
anci
al O
ffice
r(A
VP
's)
Sen
ior
Offi
cers
for
Bus
ines
s A
ffairs
(F
inan
cial
Ser
vice
s,H
uman
Res
ourc
es a
nd S
taff.
Res
iden
ce a
nd A
uxili
ary
Ser
vice
s.F
acili
ties
Man
agem
ent.
Gen
eral
Cou
nsel
)V
ice
Pre
side
nt fo
r U
nive
rsity
Adv
ance
men
tA
ssoc
iate
Vic
e P
resi
dent
for
Pub
lic R
elat
ions
Vic
e P
resi
dent
for
Gov
ernm
enta
l Rel
atio
ns -
new
pos
ition
lvac
ant
0 oD
C (
Fee
)o
.
00
00
0D
o3
AF
FIR
MA
TIV
E A
CT
ION
II
II
I3a 31
).'
3c"
3d
Non
disc
rimin
atio
n P
olic
yA
/D1
c oc
CC
C
iI
I
I
CI C
mea
n)
Ir
CC
I
Equ
al O
ppor
tuni
ty a
nd A
ffirm
ativ
e A
ctio
n P
roto
col
jc
1R
ICC
(S
GA
)E
ntire
cam
pus
cdnv
nA
ffirm
ativ
e A
ctio
n P
lan
(ann
ual u
tiliz
atio
n an
alys
is. g
oals
8 ti
met
able
s)A
ffirm
ativ
e A
ctio
n P
lan
Adv
ertis
emen
t Sta
tem
ent
Affi
rmat
ive
Act
ion
Cou
ncil,
func
tions
I
o 0 o
DC R Li
Ii
II
I
M (
fac)
1I
3ei
IIA
3tA
ffirm
ativ
e A
ctio
n C
ounc
il. s
truc
ture
Ij
Ii
See
end
note
sI
I
19
BE
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
LE
20
Res
pons
ibili
ties
Cam
pus
Dec
isio
n M
aker
sT
rust
ees
Pre
side
ntP
rovo
stA
dmin
.A
cade
mS
enat
eS
enat
eS
enat
eC
olle
geD
ept o
rC
MU
FA
Stu
dent
sO
ther
(Sen
ior
Sen
ate
Exe
cC
omm
reps
to n
onA
cade
m.
Sta
ff)B
oard
Sen
ate
Com
mU
nit
C.
PE
RS
ON
NE
L M
AT
TE
RS
- c
ontin
ued
4D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T C
HA
IRS
4aC
ontr
act p
rovi
sion
sR
RD
/A
4bS
elec
tion/
appo
intm
ent
AD
(D
eans
5F
acul
ty b
enef
itsco
ntra
ct p
rovi
sion
sA
DR
RD
/A
6F
AC
ULT
Y D
ISC
IPLI
NE
6a 6b*
6b
Pro
cedu
res
- co
ntra
ct p
rovi
sion
sA
DR
RD
/A
Dec
isio
nsD
/IR
D/R
(D
eans
)I
____
__ _
7F
AC
ULT
Y G
RIE
VA
NC
ES
- C
ON
TR
AC
T P
RO
VIS
ION
S7a
Pol
icy
and
proc
edur
esA
DR
RD
/A
lbR
esol
utio
n of
con
trac
t grie
vanc
es8'
FA
CU
LTY
GR
IEV
AN
CE
S -
SE
NA
TE
PO
LIC
Y8a
Pol
icy
and
proc
edur
esA
13b*
Res
olut
ion
of g
rieva
nces
AR
D (
Add
) D
Sen
ate
FH
C)
9F
AC
ULT
Y L
EA
VE
S O
TH
ER
TH
AN
SA
BB
AT
ICA
LS9a
Con
trac
t pro
visi
ons
AD
RR
D/A
9bD
ecis
ions
AC
D (
Dea
n)R
10F
AC
ULT
Y R
EA
PP
OIN
TM
EN
T, T
EN
UR
E A
ND
PR
OM
OT
ION
10a
Con
trac
t pro
visi
ons
AD
RR
D/A
10b
Dec
isio
ns r
egar
ding
app
lican
tsA
DC
R (
Dea
n)R
(P
ST
CM
)
11F
AC
ULT
Y R
ED
UC
TIO
N/L
AY
OF
F P
OLI
CY
llaC
ontr
act p
rovi
sion
sA
DR
RD
/A
llbD
ecis
ions
(ap
plic
atio
n)A
C (
Dea
n)
12F
AC
ULT
Y S
AB
BA
TIC
ALS
12a
Con
trac
t pro
visi
ons
AD
RR
D/A
12b
Dec
isio
ns r
egar
ding
app
lican
tsA
D
R (
Dea
n)R
(C
olC
m)
13R
EG
ULA
R F
AC
ULT
Y, A
PP
OIN
TM
EN
T A
ND
RE
AP
PO
INT
ME
NT
13a
Pos
ition
aut
horiz
atio
n -
tenu
re-t
rack
pos
ition
sD
CR
(D
ean)
R
13b
Pos
ition
aut
horiz
atio
n -
coac
hes
DR
(A
th D
ir)
13c
Pos
ition
ad
C (
FP
S)
A (
AA
O)
D (
Dea
n)
13d
Sea
rch
proc
ess
C (
Dea
n)
13e
Sel
ectio
n13
fLe
tters
of a
ppoi
ntm
ent -
con
trac
t pro
visi
ons
AD
RR
D/A
13g
Lette
rs o
f app
oint
men
t (co
nten
t of)
Dc
R (
Dea
n)l
C
13h
Rea
ppoi
ntm
ent d
ecis
ions
DC
RR
See
end
note
s
Res
pons
ibili
ties
Cam
pus
Dec
isio
n M
aker
sT
rust
ees
Pre
side
ntP
rovo
stA
dmin
.A
cade
m J
Sen
ate
Sen
ate
IS
enat
eI
Col
lege
Dep
t or
CM
UF
A I
Stu
dent
sO
ther
(Sen
ior
Sen
ate
JE
xec
J C
omm
Ire
ps to
non
IA
cade
m.
Sta
ff)J
Boa
rdI
'Sen
ate
Com
mU
nit
C.
PE
RS
ON
NE
L M
AT
TE
RS
- c
ontin
ued
14F
AC
ULT
Y W
OR
KLO
AD
14a
Con
trac
t pro
visi
ons
AD
RC
(F
PS
)J
D/A
14b
Wor
kloa
d ad
just
men
tsJ
A (
Dea
n)
15IN
TE
RN
AL
RE
SE
AR
CH
GR
AN
TS
15a
Div
ersi
ty a
nd te
chno
logy
gra
nts
ID
I
15b
FR
CE
, FT
PD
, Res
earc
h P
rofe
ssor
IJ
IJ
D
15c
Fac
ulty
Inte
rnat
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t Gra
nts
(DeB
ruin
)
21B
EST
CO
PYA
VA
ILA
BL
E22
16M
ON
ET
AR
Y A
WA
RD
SI
I
16a
Con
trac
t Pro
visi
ons
AI
DR
RI
iD
/A
16b
App
rova
l of u
nive
rsity
-wid
e aw
ard
prog
ram
IA
DD
16c
16d
18
App
rova
l of c
olle
ge/d
epar
tmen
t aw
ard
prog
ram
Pre
side
nt/P
rovo
st a
war
d po
ficy
Reo
rgan
izat
ion/
Rea
ssig
nmen
t, fa
culty
rig
hts
(con
trac
t pro
visi
ons)
I olr
AD
IA
Aj
DR
RI
II
0/A
19T
EA
CH
ING
FO
R C
EL
19a
Con
trac
t pro
visi
ons
App
rova
l of C
MU
facu
ltyA
ppro
val o
f fac
ulty
(ex
tern
al C
EL)
Tea
chin
g, e
valu
atio
n (S
OS
and
polic
y)
0R
IR
II
II
AL
D/A
19b
19c
20
DI (
CB
.)
sena
te P
olic
yI
DC
TD
iC
Ii
fD
rr21
*T
EA
CH
ING
/NO
N-T
EA
CH
ING
, OV
ER
LOA
DI
II
I
21a
Con
trac
t pro
visi
ons
Dec
isio
nsT
each
ing,
sup
plem
enta
Upr
ofes
sion
al a
ctiv
ities
- c
ontr
act p
rovi
sion
s
AI
DR
RI
IM
A21
bI
A (
Dea
n)D
22A
lD
Ri
II
D/A
23T
empo
rary
Fac
ulty
Pol
icy
AI
DI
RC
IC
IC
II
C (
Dea
n)I
*End
note
s -
Une
I
C 1
a
C 2
d
C 3
b
C 3
f
The
pre
viou
s pr
esid
ent w
as c
hose
n by
the
Boa
rd o
f Tru
stee
s w
ithou
t any
sea
rch
or s
earc
h co
mm
ittee
Invo
lvem
ent_
Thi
s w
as th
e fir
st ti
me
in th
e la
st30
yea
rs th
at th
e fa
culty
had
no
inpu
t in
the
sele
ctio
nof
the
Uni
vers
ity p
resi
dent
Und
er c
urre
nt B
oard
pol
l y, h
owev
er, t
wo
Sen
ate
repr
esen
tativ
es (
chai
r an
d ch
air-
elec
t), f
our
Boa
rd o
f Tru
stee
s m
embe
rs, o
ne a
dmin
istr
ativ
e re
pres
enta
tive,
the
pres
iden
t of t
he A
lum
ni A
ssoc
iatio
n, p
resi
dent
of t
he S
GA
and
two
com
mun
ity a
t lar
ge m
embe
rs s
erve
d as
par
t of a
n 11
mem
ber
scre
enin
g co
mm
ittee
for
sele
ctio
n of
the
curr
ent U
nive
rsity
pre
side
ntO
pen
form
was
spo
nsor
ed b
y B
OT
on
qual
ifica
tion
for
new
pre
side
nt S
cree
ning
Com
mitt
ee r
ecom
men
ded
list o
f fin
alis
ts.
The
re is
no
stan
dard
pro
cess
for
asse
ssin
g de
ans.
In s
ome
colle
ges
facu
lty h
ave
prov
ided
info
rmal
or
form
al In
put i
n th
e as
sess
men
t of t
he d
eans
. At t
his
time
the
prov
ost i
s pr
epar
ing
a pr
oced
ure
for
his
asse
ssm
ent o
f dea
ns.
Rel
ated
to th
e P
roto
col a
nd th
e P
lan
is a
pre
side
ntia
l pol
icy
title
d A
ffirm
ativ
e A
ctio
n P
lan
for
Dis
able
d V
eter
ans
and
Vie
tnam
Era
Vet
eran
s, a
nd B
OT
pol
icie
sfo
r O
n-C
ampu
s T
empo
rary
Fac
ulty
Pol
icy
and
Pol
icy
for
the
Sel
ectio
n of
Sen
ior
Offi
cers
,
The
Pre
side
nt's
Adv
isor
y C
ounc
il on
Affi
rmat
ive
Act
ion
and
Cam
pus
Equ
ity is
an
advi
sory
bod
y to
the
pres
iden
t and
unt
il th
is y
ear
had
facu
lty, s
tude
nt, a
ndem
ploy
ee r
epre
sent
ativ
es c
hose
n by
the
resp
ectiv
e gr
oups
. Dur
ing
the
curr
ent y
ear.
the
pres
iden
t red
esig
ned
the
mem
bers
hip
of th
e co
unci
l, an
d as
a r
esul
t, so
me
of th
e fo
rmer
gro
ups
are
nolo
nger
rep
rese
nted
and
the
facu
lty. s
tude
nts
and
staf
fm
embe
rs o
f the
cou
ncil
are
now
bei
ng c
hose
n by
the
pres
iden
t.
BE
STC
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
23
4o4
'End
note
s-
line
0fi
fC
7F
acul
ty g
rieva
nces
are
pro
cess
ed u
nder
eith
er th
eA
gree
men
tor
the
Sen
ate'
s P
roce
dure
s fo
r H
andl
ing
Mat
ters
of P
rofe
ssio
nal C
once
rn.'
The
col
lect
ive
barg
aini
ng a
gree
men
t bet
wee
n C
MU
and
the
CM
UF
A p
rovi
des
for
bind
ing
arbi
trat
ion
for
grie
vanc
es a
risin
g ou
t of a
llege
d vi
olat
ions
of t
he A
gree
men
t. In
con
trac
t grie
vanc
es d
ealin
g w
ith a
den
ial o
fte
nure
or
prom
otio
n, th
egr
ieva
nce
may
mak
e an
ele
ctio
n to
ref
er th
e gr
ieva
nce
to b
indi
ng a
rbitr
atio
n or
. ins
tead
, to
a co
ntra
ctua
l Fac
ulty
Rev
iew
Com
rnitt
ee th
at m
akes
a b
indi
ng d
ecis
iona
nd o
pera
tes
unde
r th
e gu
idan
ce o
f an
arbi
trat
or. T
he p
artie
s to
any
grie
vanc
e, h
owev
er, h
ave
the
pow
er to
rea
ch a
res
olut
ion
with
out t
he n
eed
for
a fo
rmal
hea
ring
and
deci
sion
by
anar
bitr
ator
or
facu
lty r
evie
w c
ortw
nitte
e.
C 8
1C 2
3T
he S
enat
e gr
ieva
nce
Pro
cedu
re fo
r H
andl
ing
Que
stio
ns o
f Pro
fess
iona
l Con
cern
..."
invo
lves
the
use
of a
facu
lty h
earin
g co
mm
ittee
(w
ithou
t the
ass
ista
nce
of a
n ar
bitr
ator
) to
cond
uct a
form
alhe
arin
g an
d to
ren
der
a bi
ndin
g de
cisi
on w
hen
the
part
ies
are
unab
le to
res
olve
the
mat
ter
them
selv
es. T
his
is th
e on
ly g
rieva
nce
proc
edur
e av
aila
ble
tote
mpo
rary
facu
lty.
Cab
A s
tand
ing
com
mitt
ee. U
nive
rsity
Grie
vanc
e R
evie
w C
omm
ittee
dec
ides
onl
y if
a gr
ieva
nce
is e
a fr
iVol
ous.
In w
hich
cas
e it
empa
nels
a r
ando
mly
-sel
ecte
d F
orm
al H
earin
g C
anm
ittee
(8 fa
culty
) to
dec
ide
the
case
. The
Pre
side
nt e
ither
app
rove
s th
e de
cisi
on o
r re
man
ds it
for
rehe
arin
g.
C 1
8M
onet
ary
Aw
ards
: The
Agr
eem
ent
prov
ides
that
any
new
or
revi
sed
univ
ersi
ty m
onet
ary
awar
ds a
re to
be
reco
mm
ende
d by
the
Aca
dem
ic S
enat
e, s
ubje
ct to
rat
ifica
tion
by b
oth
the
CM
U B
oard
ofT
rust
ees
and
the
CM
UF
A. I
n th
e ca
se o
f new
or
revi
sed
colle
ge m
onet
ary
awar
ds. C
MU
and
the
CM
UF
A h
ave
agre
ed o
n th
e pr
oces
s, b
ut im
plem
enta
tion
is to
be
dete
rmin
ed b
y de
part
men
ts/u
nits
as
spec
ified
by
the
Agr
eem
ent.
C 1
6dM
embe
rshi
p on
the
Com
mitt
ee is
as
follo
ws:
Dea
n. C
olle
ge o
f Gra
duat
e S
tudi
es, a
nd o
ne r
epre
sent
ativ
e ea
ch fr
om th
e S
enat
e E
xecu
tive
Boa
rd. R
esea
rch
Exc
elle
nce
Fun
d C
omm
ittee
.F
acul
ty R
esea
rch
Cre
ativ
e E
ndea
vors
Com
mitt
ee. R
esea
rch
Pro
fess
orsh
ip C
omm
ittee
. Offi
ce o
f Ins
titut
iona
l Div
ersi
ty. C
olle
ge o
f Bus
ines
s A
dmin
istr
atio
n. C
olle
ge o
f Hum
aniti
es a
nd S
ocia
l and
Beh
avio
ral S
cien
ces,
Col
lege
of H
ealth
Pro
fess
ions
. Col
lege
of C
omm
unic
atio
n an
d F
ine
Art
s. C
olle
ge o
f Edu
catio
n an
d H
uman
Ser
vice
s, a
nd C
olle
ge o
f Sci
ence
and
Tec
hnol
ogy.
C 1
9cB
y co
ntra
ct b
etw
een
CM
U a
nd C
MU
FA
a C
a R
evie
w C
omm
ittee
is c
reat
ed to
con
side
r ap
peal
s of
reg
ular
facu
lty n
ot a
ssig
ned
to a
CE
L co
urse
, of C
EL
wan
ting
to h
ire a
par
ticul
ar fa
culty
mem
ber,
and
tose
ttle
sele
cted
dis
agre
emen
ts b
etw
een
CE
L an
d a
depa
rtm
ent a
bout
cou
rse
offe
rings
.
C 2
1T
each
ing/
non-
teac
hing
ove
rload
ref
ers
to o
n-ca
mpu
s as
sign
men
ts th
at a
re v
olun
taril
y as
sum
ed in
add
ition
to o
ne's
reg
ular
ly a
ssig
ned
dutie
s du
ring
the
fall
or s
prin
g se
mes
ter.
Com
pens
atio
n fo
r th
e ov
erlo
ad is
con
ditio
ned
on th
e ap
prov
al o
f the
dep
artm
ent/u
nit c
hairp
erso
n an
d th
e re
leva
nt d
ean
and
is g
over
ned
by th
eA
gree
men
t.
C 2
2S
uppl
emen
tat/p
rofe
ssio
nal a
ctiv
ities
may
incl
ude
volu
ntar
y on
-cam
pus
teac
hing
or
non-
teac
hing
ass
ignm
ents
dur
ing
the
sum
mer
; vol
unta
ry te
achi
ng a
ssig
nmen
ts o
ff-ca
mpu
s fo
r C
EL
anyt
ime
durin
g th
e ca
lend
ar y
ear,
and
/or
othe
r no
n-te
achi
ng p
rofe
ssio
nal a
ctiv
ities
. Sup
plem
enta
l act
iviti
es a
re s
ubje
ct to
the
limita
tions
impo
sed
by th
e re
leva
nt p
rovi
sion
s of
the
Agr
eem
ent.
C 2
3/C
8T
he S
enat
e gr
ieva
nce
Pro
cedu
re fo
r H
andl
ing
Que
stio
ns o
f Pro
fess
iona
l Con
cern
..."
invo
lves
the
use
of a
facu
lty h
earin
g co
mm
ittee
(w
ithou
t the
ass
ista
nce
of a
n ar
bitr
ator
) to
cond
uct a
form
alhe
arin
g an
d to
ren
der
a bi
ndin
g de
cisi
on w
hen
the
part
ies
are
unab
le to
res
olve
the
mat
ter
them
selv
es. T
his
is th
e on
ly g
rieva
nce
proc
edur
e av
aila
ble
tote
mpo
rary
facu
lty.
4B
EST
CO
PY M
AIL
AB
LE
Res
pons
ibili
ties
Cam
pus
Dec
isio
n M
aker
s11
Tru
stee
st P
resi
dent
' Pro
vost
Adr
nin
I Aca
dem
Sen
ate
Sen
ate
IS
enat
eI C
olde
rD
ept o
rC
MU
FA
IS
tude
nts
IO
ster
(Sen
ior
I Sen
ate
Exe
cC
omm
I_ r
eps
to n
on I_
Aca
dem
.S
taff)
1B
oard
'Sen
ate
Cor
mtin
eD
. .C
UR
RIC
ULA
R M
AT
TE
RS
Aca
dem
ic fr
eedo
m is
sues
(ot
her
than
grie
vanc
es0
2A
CA
DE
MIC
PLA
NN
ING
CO
UN
CIL
(A
PC
),I
I2a
Cha
rge,
com
posi
tion.
and
ope
ratin
g pr
oced
ures
Aca
dem
ic P
lann
in C
ounc
il S
enat
e re
.-
-ta
tives
, ele
ctio
n of
0I
CC
IR
I R (
Dea
n)2b
0C
A
R (
Dea
n)R
1 (S
tate
)2c
...A
cade
mic
Pro
gram
dis
cont
inua
tion
RR
(A
PC
)2d
Aca
dem
ic P
rogr
am R
evie
wD
R (
AP
C)
2eN
ew A
cade
mic
Pro
gram
sA
ppro
val o
f new
aca
dem
ic p
rogr
ams
afte
r A
PC
App
rova
l of o
ther
cur
ricul
ar a
ctio
ns
01.
1 (A
PC
)IA
(A
PC
)R
(D
ean)
RI
R RC
3A
(D
egre
es)I
DR
IIA
A (
Sta
te)
4O
R5'
CE
L C
UR
RIC
ULA
R A
CT
ION
S. A
PP
RO
VA
L (F
OR
EX
IST
ING
CO
UR
SE
S)
5aC
ours
e fo
rmat
s
ID
(C
EL)
5bC
ours
es o
ffere
d0
(CE
L)6'
Boa
rd o
f Vis
itors
rec
omm
enda
tions
, app
rova
lI
1D
CR
IC
(C
EL)
7'C
urric
ular
Aut
horit
y D
ocum
ent,
appr
oval
of
CD
CR
Ri
R
kr8
Deg
rees
, est
ablis
hing
req
uire
men
tsA
OR
MA
(S
tate
)9
Pro
mot
e ed
ucat
ion
enric
hmen
t out
side
das
sroo
m (
via
Sen
ate
Com
mitt
ees)
IC
I0
10S
TU
DE
NT
AD
MIS
SIO
N/R
ET
EN
TIO
N. S
TA
ND
AR
DS
1CO
LLE
GE
)I
10a
Sen
ate
polic
ies
All
othe
r un
iver
sity
wid
e po
licie
s
Sta
ndar
dsA
dmis
sion
cap
s.
.
C0
R10
b
10c
10d
AID
D II
RC
omm
)D
C11
ST
UD
EN
T O
UT
CO
ME
S A
SS
ES
SM
EN
T (
PR
OG
RA
M)
I1
1 a
1 lb
Pol
icy
1
DI
tI
RIm
plem
enta
tion
AIR
C (
Dea
n)E
ndno
tes
- lin
e a
D 2
/B1
D 2
c
D 2
d
D 3
The
Aca
dem
ic P
lann
ing
Cou
ncil
(AP
C).
an
advi
sory
bod
y to
the
prov
ost,
revi
ews
acad
emic
prog
ram
s, a
ccre
dita
tion
repo
rts,
and
othe
r ne
w in
itiat
ives
for
poss
ible
fund
ing.
Six
facu
lty S
enat
e re
pres
enta
tives
by th
e pr
ovos
t and
are
sub
ject
to c
hang
e at
the
disc
retio
n of
the
may
invo
lve
reso
urce
impl
icat
ions
whi
ch a
re d
iscu
ssed
by
the
affe
cted
by
the
prog
ram
, the
Cur
ricul
ar A
utho
rity
Doc
umen
t req
uire
sIf
the
curr
icul
ar b
ody
rece
ives
a p
rote
st w
ithin
14
days
it m
ust h
old
ain
dis
solu
tion
of a
col
lege
, sch
ool,
depa
rtm
erd,
or
acad
emic
uni
t. th
e P
olic
y
conc
entr
atio
ns, g
radu
ate
optio
ns, a
nd g
radu
ate
emph
ases
.
the
prop
osal
exc
eeds
$10
0.00
0.
and
the
dean
s pr
ovid
e fo
rmal
inpu
t via
bal
lotin
g on
var
ious
pro
posa
ls. T
he o
pera
ting
polic
ies
and
proc
edur
es o
f the
AP
C a
re d
eter
min
edpr
ovos
t. Im
plem
enta
tion
plan
s sh
ould
be
incl
uded
with
new
initi
ativ
e pr
opos
als.
The
impl
emen
tatio
n pl
an o
f a c
urric
ular
pro
posa
lA
cade
mic
Sen
ate
as p
art o
f the
cur
ricul
ar a
ppro
val p
roce
ss.
If a
prop
osal
to d
elet
e a
prog
ram
orig
inat
es o
utsi
de th
e de
part
men
t hou
sing
the
prog
ram
or
outs
ide
a de
part
men
t sub
stan
tially
trea
ting
the
prop
osal
as
an A
dvan
ce N
otic
e ite
m. A
cur
ricul
ar b
ody
rece
ivin
g su
ch a
pro
posa
l mus
t not
ify th
e af
fect
ed d
epar
tmen
t(s)
.he
arin
g at
whi
ch a
ll si
des
pres
ent t
heir
posi
tions
. The
cur
ricul
ar b
ody
may
then
rec
omm
end
actio
n. If
suc
h a
prop
osal
wou
ld r
esul
ton
Aca
dem
ic O
rgan
izat
ion
(B3b
abo
ve)
take
s pr
eced
ence
.
The
term
'aca
dem
ic p
rogr
ams.
' for
pur
pose
s of
this
doc
umen
t and
grid
, is
broa
dly
defin
ed to
cov
er a
llde
gree
s, m
ajor
s, m
inor
s,
App
rova
l of n
ew p
rogr
ams
and
degr
ees
mus
t be
obta
ined
from
the
CM
U B
oard
of T
rust
ees
in c
ases
whe
re th
e pr
ojec
ted
cost
of
07B
EST
CO
PY A
VA
ILA
BL
E40
8
End
note
s-
tune
#12
D 5
CE
L (C
olle
ge o
f Ext
ende
d Le
arni
ng)
offe
rs d
egre
es, p
rogr
ams,
and
cou
rses
prim
arily
to n
on-t
radi
tiona
l stu
dent
s. C
urric
ular
pro
posa
ls fo
r C
EL
offe
rings
are
sub
ject
to th
ere
quire
men
ts o
f the
Cur
ricul
ar A
utho
rity
Doc
umen
t and
mus
t be
appr
oved
thro
ugh
the
Sen
ate'
s cu
rric
ular
rev
iew
pro
cess
es.
The
Boa
rd o
f Vis
itors
(B
OV
) is
a S
enat
e co
mm
ittee
cha
rged
with
con
duct
ing
a re
view
of C
EL
and
its p
rogr
ams
ever
y fiv
e ye
ars.
The
Boa
rd o
fV
isito
rs s
ubm
its it
s re
port
and
rec
omm
enda
tions
D 6
to th
e A
cade
mic
Sen
ate
for
poss
ible
dis
cuss
ion
and
actio
n. Im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e ap
prov
ed r
ecom
men
datio
ns is
the
resp
onsi
bilit
y of
the
Ass
ista
nt V
ice
Pre
side
nt fo
r A
cade
mic
Affa
irs.
The
Cur
ricul
ar A
utho
rity
Doc
umen
t est
ablis
hes
and
gove
rns
the
univ
ersi
ty's
cur
ricul
ar p
roce
sses
for
the
crea
tion
and
appr
oval
of a
ll cu
rric
ular
pro
gram
s, d
egre
es, a
nd c
ours
e of
ferin
gs,
whe
ther
on
or o
ff ca
mpu
s. P
ropo
sed
revi
sion
s to
this
doc
umen
t are
sub
ject
to a
ppro
val b
y th
e A
cade
mic
Sen
ate.
The
Boa
rd e
stab
lishe
s br
oad
inst
itutio
nal p
olic
y w
hich
may
affe
ct s
tude
nt a
dmis
sion
s an
d re
tent
ion.
For
exa
mpl
e, th
e B
oard
pro
vide
s gu
idan
ce to
the
Adm
inis
trat
ion
thro
ugh
Boa
rd a
ppro
val
of th
e"U
nive
rsity
Vis
ion
Sta
tem
ent a
nd K
ey O
bjec
tives
." O
ther
issu
es r
elat
ing
to u
nive
rsity
wid
e-st
anda
rds
for
stud
ent a
dmis
sion
s an
d re
tent
ion
are
mat
ters
for
Sen
ate
cons
ider
atio
n. H
owev
er, c
onfli
ct e
xist
sbe
twee
n cu
rren
t ins
titut
iona
l pro
cedu
res
and
Sen
ate
cons
titut
ion.
D 7
D 1
0b
r) 9
BE
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
30
Reproduction Release
U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)
National Library of Education (NLE)Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)
Reproduction Release(Specific Document)
I. DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION:
http://ericfac.piccard.csc.com/reprod.html
0331S-0
ERIC
Title:A Contemporary Matrix Approach to Defining Shared Governance
Author(s): Richard Davenport
Corporate Source:
Central Michigan UniversityPublication Date:
II. REPRODUCTION RELEASE:
In order to disseminate as widely as possible timely and significant materials of interest to the educational community,documents announced in the monthly abstract journal of the ERIC system, Resources in Education (RIE), are usually madeavailable to users in microfiche, reproduced paper copy, and electronic media, and sold through the ERIC DocumentReproduction Service (EDRS). Credit is given to the source of each document, and, if reproduction release is granted, one ofthe following notices is affixed to the document.
If permission is granted to reproduce and disseminate the identified document, please CHECK ONE of the following threeoptions and sign in the indicated space following.
The sample sticker shown below will be affixed toall Level I documents
The sample sticker shown below will be affixed to all :
Level 2A documentsThe sample sticker shown below will be affixed
Level 2B documents
PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS
BEEN GRAN I3Y
RIPLZIWIIIMEINCRUNLIK."DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL IN
1ICROPICHF, AND IN ELECTRONIC MEDIA)R ERIC: CCILLECTIQN SUBSCRIBERS ONLY,
1-IAS BEEN GRAN' '1) BY
PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE. Al,DISSEMINATE. 11-11S MATERIAL I
ICROPECRE ONLY HAS B 'N GRANT
TO THE EDUCATIONA L It ESOU RCINFORMATION CENTER t ERIC)
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
TO THE ED UCATIONAL RESOURCE'SINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
Level I Level 2A Level 2B
FiTi Ya
Check here for Level I release, permittingreproduction and dissemination in microfiche orother ERIC archival media (e.g. electronic) and
paper copy.
Check here for Level 2A release, permittingreproduction and dissemination in microfiche and in
electronic media for ERIC archival collectionsubscribers only
Check here for Level 2B release, permittit.4reproduction and dissemination in microfiche (
Documents will be processed as indicated provided reproduction quality permits.If permission to reproduce is granted, but no box is checked, documents will be processed at Level I.
1 of 3 7/18/00 11:18 AM
Reproduction Release http://ericfac.piccard.csc.com/reprod.html
I hereby grant to the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) nonexclusive permission to reproduce anddisseminate this document as indicated above. Reproduction from the ERIC microfiche, or electronic media by persons otherthan ERIC employees and its system contractors requires permission from the copyright holder. Exception is made fornon-profit reproduction by libraries and other service agencies to satisfi, information needs of educators in response todiscrete inqui
Signature:
.....1111111111116.
Ailrif 71 Provost:and Vice President for Academic Affairs
ed Name/Position/Title:
Organization Address: Fax:Central Michigan University
WA 112
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859
Tele hone:517/774 -3932 527/774-2042
1E-mail Address: Date:
ichard.w.davenport@cmich edu 7/18/00
III. DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY INFORMATION (FROM NON-ERIC SOURCE):
If permission to reproduce is not granted to ERIC, or, if you wish ERIC to cite the availability of the document from anothersource, please provide the following information regarding the availability of the document. (ERIC will not announce adocument unless it is publicly available, and a dependable source can be specified. Contributors should also be aware that ERICselection criteria are significantly more stringent for documents that cannot be made available through EDRS.)
Publisher/Distributor:
Address:
Price:
IV. REFERRAL OF ERIC TO COPYRIGHT/REPRODUCTION RIGHTS HOLDER:
If the right to grant this reproduction release is held by someone other than the addressee, please provide the appropriate nameand address:
Name:
Address:
V. WHERE TO SEND THIS FORM:
2 of 3 7/18/00 11:18 AM
Reproduction Release http://ericfac.piccard.csc.corn/reprod.html
Send this form to the following ERIC Clearinghouse:
However, if solicited by the ERIC Facility, or if making an unsolicited contribution to ERIC, return this form and the documentbeing contributed) to:
ERIC Processing and Reference Facility4483-A Forbes BoulevardLanham, Maryland 20706Telephone: 301-552-4200Toll Free: 800-799-3742
e-mail: [email protected]: http://ericfac.piccard.csc.com
EFF-088 (Rev. 9/97)
3 of 3 7/18/00 11:18 AM
