Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ICOLC Paris Content in repositories -Dominated by journal articles -59% -Preponderating published versions -71% vs. European average of 43.6% -Less populated by post prints -21,4% vs. European average of 46.2% -Only 1 repository primarily pre prints
Citation preview
Repositories, mandates & author rights managementDutch situation
ICOLC Paris 20092
Repositories 2008- 15 repositories at Dutch universities- Majority established in 2004 or earlier- Repositories integrated in national portal NARCIS
- Total number records 413.761- 27.584 vs. European average 8.500
- Coverage- 35% of scholarly publications- 90% of dissertations
ICOLC Paris 20093
Content in repositories- Dominated by journal articles
- 59%
- Preponderating published versions- 71% vs. European average of 43.6%
- Less populated by post prints- 21,4% vs. European average of 46.2%
- Only 1 repository primarily pre prints
ICOLC Paris 20094
Policies- 4 institutions partly mandatory- 8 institutions strong request- 2 institutions no policy
- Exceptions for dissertations- most institutions mandate for deposit
dissertation in repository- no mandate for making available
ICOLC Paris 20095
Policies- Open access funds
- 2 institutions open access fund- 20.000€ not fully used
- 8 publications- 2 hybrid journals- 6 BioMed
- 75.000€- About 20 publications
ICOLC Paris 20096
Copyright Contacts- Each university has established a Copyright Contact- Varies from website to helpdesk- Varies from 2 hours a week to 1 FTE
- Raising awareness and give information about open access
- Assistance researchers depositing their scholarly output
ICOLC Paris 20097
Restraining factors- 47% researchers
- lack of user friendly delivery systems- lack of mandates
- 20-27% researchers- lack of knowledge about copyright aspects- lack of assistance increasing visibility and
citations- lack of interest policy makers- no integration with other systems
- <20% researchers- no requirements funders- raising awareness activities
ICOLC Paris 20098
Conclusions- Mandate for depositing dissertations effective and
leads to depositing rate of more than 90%- Open access funds partly successful mostly in
medical environment- Raising awareness time consuming but effective- Emphasis on depositing published version leads to
higher percentage of this version
