Report Tpm 3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    1/12

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    2/12

    Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine

    | P a g e 52

    6.4.2 Weekly

    Figure 9: Route map for weekly inspection

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    3/12

    Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine

    | P a g e 53

    6.5 TPM KAIZEN SHEETS

    Figure 10: Tpm-kaizen idea sheet 1

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    4/12

    Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine

    | P a g e 54

    Figure 11: Tpm-kaizen idea sheet 2

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    5/12

    Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine

    | P a g e 55

    Figure 12: Tpm-kaizen idea sheet 3

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    6/12

    Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine

    | P a g e 56

    Figure 13: Tpm-kaizen idea sheet 4

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    7/12

    Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine

    | P a g e 57

    6.6 OEE CALCULATION

    OEE FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL

    Item Data

    Shift Length 8hrx2shiftsx24days =

    23040min.

    Short Breaks 2 @ 15 min. = 30 min.

    Meal Break 1 @ 30 min. = 30 min.

    Down Time 2256 minutes

    Ideal Run Rate 1 pieces per minute

    Total Pieces 14348 pieces

    Reject Pieces893 pieces

    Table 5: Data for the month of April

    Planned Production Time= [Shift Length - Breaks] = [23040 - 2880]= 20160 minutes

    Operating Time= [Planned Production Time - Down Time] = [20160 - 2256] =

    17904minutes

    Good Pieces= [Total Pieces - Reject Pieces] = [14348 - 893] = 13455 pieces

    Availability =Operating Time / Planned

    Production Time

    17904 minutes /20160minutes

    0.89 (89%)

    Performance =(Total Pieces / Operating Time) /

    Ideal Run Rate

    =(14348 pieces /17904 minutes) / 1

    pieces per minute

    = 0.82(82%)

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    8/12

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    9/12

    Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine

    | P a g e 59

    6.7 COST ANALYSIS:

    COST ANALYSIS FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY:

    Revenue Quoted = Total productproduced x price per

    piece

    = 13850 x 80 = 1108000 Rupees

    Actual revenue = Total no of Quality

    product x price per

    piece

    = 12890 x 80 =1031200 Rupees

    Loss due to

    rejected

    = Scraps x price per

    piece

    = 960 x 80 = 76800 Rupees

    Loss Due To Downtime

    DOWNTIME = 3960 minutes

    Ideal run rate = 1 piece per minute

    Products that

    could have beenproduced during

    downtime

    Downtime x Ideal run

    rate = 3960 X 1 = 3960 pieces

    Revenue that

    could have been

    generated during

    downtimePieces x rate per piece = 3960 X 80 =316800 Rupees

    Table 7: Cost analysis for February

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    10/12

    Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine

    | P a g e 60

    COST ANALYSIS FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL:

    Revenue Quoted = Total product

    produced x price per

    piece

    = 14348 x 80 = 1147840 Rupees

    Actual Revenue = Total no of Quality

    product x price per

    piece

    =13455 x 80 =1076400 Rupees

    Loss due to

    rejected

    = Scraps x price per

    piece

    = 893 x 80 = 71440 Rupees

    Loss Due To Downtime

    DOWNTIME = 2256 minutes

    Ideal run rate = 1 piece per minute

    products that

    could have beenproduced during

    downtime

    Downtime x ideal run

    rate = 2256 X 1 = 2256 pieces

    revenue that couldhave been

    generated during

    downtimePieces x rupees = 2256 X 80 =180480 Rupees

    Table 8: Cost analysis for April

    A significant reduction in down time can be observed from the month ofFebruary to April.

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    11/12

    Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine

    | P a g e 61

    Conclusion

    The press brake machine which did not have proper maintenance and was creating bottleneck in

    the production, now has higher overall equipment effectiveness. Also noticeable is the reductionof defects in the samples.

    TPM has also created awareness among the operators, a sense of responsibility and also

    provided a safe working environment for them.

    TPM has increased the availability of the machine due to good maintenance, has increased

    revenue for the company and hence acts as a cost saving tool.

  • 7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3

    12/12

    Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine

    | P a g e 62

    References

    1. Implementation of TPM- Steve Borris2. www.plant-tpm.com3. www.tpmclubofindia.com

    http://www.plant-tpm.com/http://www.tpmclubofindia.com/http://www.tpmclubofindia.com/http://www.plant-tpm.com/