Upload
siddharth-srinivasan
View
229
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
1/12
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
2/12
Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine
| P a g e 52
6.4.2 Weekly
Figure 9: Route map for weekly inspection
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
3/12
Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine
| P a g e 53
6.5 TPM KAIZEN SHEETS
Figure 10: Tpm-kaizen idea sheet 1
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
4/12
Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine
| P a g e 54
Figure 11: Tpm-kaizen idea sheet 2
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
5/12
Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine
| P a g e 55
Figure 12: Tpm-kaizen idea sheet 3
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
6/12
Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine
| P a g e 56
Figure 13: Tpm-kaizen idea sheet 4
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
7/12
Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine
| P a g e 57
6.6 OEE CALCULATION
OEE FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL
Item Data
Shift Length 8hrx2shiftsx24days =
23040min.
Short Breaks 2 @ 15 min. = 30 min.
Meal Break 1 @ 30 min. = 30 min.
Down Time 2256 minutes
Ideal Run Rate 1 pieces per minute
Total Pieces 14348 pieces
Reject Pieces893 pieces
Table 5: Data for the month of April
Planned Production Time= [Shift Length - Breaks] = [23040 - 2880]= 20160 minutes
Operating Time= [Planned Production Time - Down Time] = [20160 - 2256] =
17904minutes
Good Pieces= [Total Pieces - Reject Pieces] = [14348 - 893] = 13455 pieces
Availability =Operating Time / Planned
Production Time
17904 minutes /20160minutes
0.89 (89%)
Performance =(Total Pieces / Operating Time) /
Ideal Run Rate
=(14348 pieces /17904 minutes) / 1
pieces per minute
= 0.82(82%)
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
8/12
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
9/12
Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine
| P a g e 59
6.7 COST ANALYSIS:
COST ANALYSIS FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY:
Revenue Quoted = Total productproduced x price per
piece
= 13850 x 80 = 1108000 Rupees
Actual revenue = Total no of Quality
product x price per
piece
= 12890 x 80 =1031200 Rupees
Loss due to
rejected
= Scraps x price per
piece
= 960 x 80 = 76800 Rupees
Loss Due To Downtime
DOWNTIME = 3960 minutes
Ideal run rate = 1 piece per minute
Products that
could have beenproduced during
downtime
Downtime x Ideal run
rate = 3960 X 1 = 3960 pieces
Revenue that
could have been
generated during
downtimePieces x rate per piece = 3960 X 80 =316800 Rupees
Table 7: Cost analysis for February
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
10/12
Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine
| P a g e 60
COST ANALYSIS FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL:
Revenue Quoted = Total product
produced x price per
piece
= 14348 x 80 = 1147840 Rupees
Actual Revenue = Total no of Quality
product x price per
piece
=13455 x 80 =1076400 Rupees
Loss due to
rejected
= Scraps x price per
piece
= 893 x 80 = 71440 Rupees
Loss Due To Downtime
DOWNTIME = 2256 minutes
Ideal run rate = 1 piece per minute
products that
could have beenproduced during
downtime
Downtime x ideal run
rate = 2256 X 1 = 2256 pieces
revenue that couldhave been
generated during
downtimePieces x rupees = 2256 X 80 =180480 Rupees
Table 8: Cost analysis for April
A significant reduction in down time can be observed from the month ofFebruary to April.
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
11/12
Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine
| P a g e 61
Conclusion
The press brake machine which did not have proper maintenance and was creating bottleneck in
the production, now has higher overall equipment effectiveness. Also noticeable is the reductionof defects in the samples.
TPM has also created awareness among the operators, a sense of responsibility and also
provided a safe working environment for them.
TPM has increased the availability of the machine due to good maintenance, has increased
revenue for the company and hence acts as a cost saving tool.
7/31/2019 Report Tpm 3
12/12
Implementation of TPM on Press Brake Machine
| P a g e 62
References
1. Implementation of TPM- Steve Borris2. www.plant-tpm.com3. www.tpmclubofindia.com
http://www.plant-tpm.com/http://www.tpmclubofindia.com/http://www.tpmclubofindia.com/http://www.plant-tpm.com/