148
REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR STANDARD REFERENCE SAMPLES DISTRIBUTED IN SEPTEMBER 1996: T-143 (TRACE CONSTITUENTS), T-145 (TRACE CONSTITUENTS), M-140 (MAJOR CONSTITUENTS), N-51 (NUTRIENT CONSTITUENTS), N-52 (NUTRIENT CONSTITUENTS), P-27 (LOW IONIC STRENGTH CONSTITUENTS), AND Hg-23 (MERCURY) by Jerry W. Farrar and H. Keith Long U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 97-20 Lakewood, Colorado 1997

REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR STANDARD REFERENCE SAMPLES DISTRIBUTED IN SEPTEMBER 1996:

T-143 (TRACE CONSTITUENTS), T-145 (TRACE CONSTITUENTS),M-140 (MAJOR CONSTITUENTS), N-51 (NUTRIENT CONSTITUENTS),

N-52 (NUTRIENT CONSTITUENTS), P-27 (LOW IONIC STRENGTHCONSTITUENTS), AND Hg-23 (MERCURY)

by Jerry W. Farrar and H. Keith Long

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Open-File Report 97-20

Lakewood, Colorado 1997

Page 2: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Gordon P. Eaton, Director

For additional informationwrite to:William J. ShampineU.S. Geological SurveyWater Resources DivisionBox 25046, Mail Stop 414Denver Federal CenterDenver, Colorado 80225-0046

Copies of this report can bepurchased from:U.S. Geological SurveyBranch of Information ServicesBox 25286Denver, Colorado 80225-0286

Page 3: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

CONTENTS

Page

Abstract...........................................................................^ 1

Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1

Purpose and scope ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2

Preparation of standard reference samples ....................................................................................................................................... 5

Laboratory Analyses........................................................................................................................................................................ 7

Laboratory performance ratings ....................................................................................................................................................... 9

Statistical presentation of data......................................................................................................................................................... 9

Reference ...................................................................................................................................................................^ 10

FIGURE

Figure 1. Statistical parameters shown on reported-data graphs ................................................................................................... 10

TABLES

Table 1. Laboratory participants in the analyses of standard reference samples distributed in September 1996 ......................... 3

2. Analytes determined in standard reference samples distributed in September 1996....................................................... 7

3. Analytical methods codes......................................... 8

4. Overall laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water samples distributed in September 1996............... 11

5. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents).................................. 13

6. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents).................................. 21

7. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)............................... 29

8. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample N-51 (nutrient constituents)............................... 35

9. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample N-52 (nutrient constituents)............................... 37

10. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituents)............... 39

11. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample Hg-23 (mercury)............................................... 43

12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)........................... 44

13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)........................... 73

14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)........................ 102

15. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-51 (nutrient constituents)....................... 119

16. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-52 (nutrient constituents)....................... 125

17. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituents)........ 131

18. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample Hg-23 (mercury)......................................... 143

19. Most probable values for constituents and properties in standard reference samples distributed in September 1996 ... 145

Page 4: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR STANDARD REFERENCE SAMPLES DISTRIBUTED IN SEPTEMBER 1996:

T-143 (TRACE CONSTITUENTS), T-145 (TRACE CONSTITUENTS), M-140 (MAJOR CONSTITUENTS), N-51 (NUTRIENT CONSTITUENTS),

N-52 (NUTRIENT CONSTITUENTS), P-27 (LOW IONIC STRENGTH CONSTITUENTS), AND Hg-23 (MERCURY)

By Jerry W. Farrar and H. Keith Long

ABSTRACT

This report presents the results of the U.S. Geological Survey's analytical evaluation program for 7 standard reference samples - T-143 (trace constituents), T-145 (trace constituents), M-140 (major constituents)., N-51 (nutrient constituents), N-52 (nutrient constituents), P-27 (low ionic strength constituents), and Hg-23 (mercury) - that were distributed in September 1996 to 167 laboratories registered in the U.S. Geological Survey sponsored interlaboratory testing program. Analytical data that were received from 140 of the laboratories were evaluated with respect to: overall laboratory performance and relative laboratory performance for each analyte in the seven reference samples. Results of these evaluations are presented in tabular form. Also presented are tables and graphs summarizing the analytical data provided by each laboratory for each analyte in the seven standard reference samples. The most probable value for each analyte was determined using nonparametric statistics.

INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) conducts an interlaboratory evaluation program semiannually. This program provides a variety of reference materials to accomplish quality assurance testing of laboratories and to provide an adequate supply of samples that contribute to quality control programs of participating laboratories. Natural-matrix reference materials are preferred for use in this interlaboratory evaluation program. A series of samples are prepared and distributed each spring and fall. Occasionally, sediment samples are provided.

The program began in 1962 with a single sample containing major constituents that was prepared from distilled water and reagent grade chemicals. Twenty-three USGS laboratories participated in the 1962 determinations of six analytes in the major standard reference sample (SRS). Since that time, objectives of the program have been to:

(1) evaluate and improve the performance of USGS and other participating laboratories;

(2) provide a library of carefully prepared, homogeneous, stable reference materials for use in the quality control programs of laboratories;

(3) identify analytical problem areas;(4) identify quality assurance needs with respect to environmental analyses and

develop new reference materials to meet these needs; and(5) ascertain the accuracy and precision of analytical methods.

Two hundred fifteen USGS and non-USGS laboratories are registered in the program, which can currently provide eight standard reference sample types:

Page 5: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

1. Trace constituents.2. Major constituents.3. Nutrient constituents.4. Low ionic strength constituents.5. Mercury.6. Whole water (water with suspended sediment).7. Acid mine drainage constituents.8. Sediment (bed material) for major and trace constituents.

When sufficient data are available, a most probable value is statistically determined for each analyte in the SRS.

Though this is not a laboratory certification program, participation in this continuing quality assurance program is mandatory for all laboratories providing water-analyses data for USGS data storage or use (publications). Federal, State, municipal, and university laboratories can participate even though they do not provide data to the USGS. Analyses of these SRS provides the means to alert participating laboratories of possible deficiencies in their analytical operations, and also provides reference mater als for in-house quality control programs. Participating laboratories are identified only by a confidential code number.

A library of SRS, from previous evaluations, are available. Participating laboratories can purchase previous SRS for further testing, continuing quality assurance, and quality control programs by contacting:

U.S. Geological SurveyBranch of Technical Development and Quality SystemsDenver Federal CenterBox 25046 MS 401Denver, Colorado 80225-0046(303) 236-1870

Purpose and Scope

This report summarizes the analytical results submitted by 140 of the 167 laboratories that requested and were shipped SRS for the January 1997 evaluation (table 1). Not all SRS are requested, nor necessarily analyzed by all the laboratories; nor do all laboratories enrolled in the program participate in each evaluation. Analytical results for the following, which were mailed the week of September 9, 1996, are presented in this report:

T-143 Trace constituentsT-145 Trace constituentsM-140 Major constituentsN-51 Nutrient constituentsN-52 Nutrient constituentsP-27 Low ionic strength constituents (precipitation)Hg-23 Mercury

The USGS requested that analytical results be returned by November 15, 1996 for evaluation and preparation of this report. Each participating laboratory is requested to perform those determinations routinely made on the respective SRS for USGS investigations and to indicate the information was provided, it has been included in the respective data table. The analytical data are represented in w^-ys

Page 6: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

that allow participants to evaluate data distribution, scatters, outliers, central tendency, bias, skewness, and method relationships.

Table 1.-Laboratory participants in the analyses of standard reference samples distributed in September 1996

City_________State Participating LaboratoryAlabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Tuscaloosa

Soldotna

Yuma

Arkadelphia

Fayetteville

Little Rock

Davis

La Verne

Martinez

Oakland

Perris

Sacramento

Sacramento

Sacramento

Santa Fe Springs

Tahoe City

West Sacramento

West Sacramento

Alamosa

Arvada

Arvada

Aurora

Colorado Springs

Denver

Denver

Denver

Fort Collins

Fort Collins

Fort CollinsGolden

Loveland

Northglenn

Westminster

Bradenton

Brooksville

Ocala

Orlando

Ormond Beach

Palatka

Tallahassee

Tallahassee

Tallahassee

Tampa

West Palm Beach

Athens

Atlanta

Atlanta

Decatur

Tifton

Honolulu

Geological Survey of Alabama

Alaska Department of Fish and Game

Bums and Roe Services Corporation

Ouachita Baptist University

University of Arkansas

Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology

University of California - Davis

Metropolitan Water District

Central Contra Costa Sanitary District

East Bay Municipal Utility District

Eastern Municipal Water District

Anlab

US Bureau of Reclamation

USGS WRD

West Coast Analytical Service, Inc.

Tahoe Research Group

California Department of Water Resources

Quanterra

Bureau of Reclamation

Quanterra

USGS-NWQL

Core Laboratories, Inc.

City of Colorado Springs

US Bureau of Reclamation

USGS Colorado District Toxic Project

Denver Water Department

City of Fort Collins - Water Quality

CSU - Soil Testing Laboratory

USDA Forest Service

Kaiser - Hill Rocky Flats

Northern Colorado Water Conservation

Northglenn Water Treatment Plant

City of Westminster

Manatee County Environmental Management

SW Florida Water Management District

USGS WRD QWSU

Post, Bucklye, Schuh, and Jemigan, Inc.Environmental Laboratory

St John's River Management District

City of Tallahassee

Florida Department of Environmental Regulations

Savannah Laboratories

Hillsborough County Environmental Protection Commission

South Florida Water Management District

University of Georgia

Georgia Department of Natural Resources

USGS WRD

Dekalb County Water Quality Laboratory

USDA-ARSUniversity of Hawaii - SOEST Analytical Services

Page 7: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 1. -Laboratory participants in the analyses of standard reference samples distributed in September 1996-Continued

State Citv Particioatina LaboratoryIdaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Maryland

Michigan

Minnesota

Missouri

Montana

Nevada

New York

North Carolina

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Boise

Pocatello

Champaign

Champaign

Indianapolis

Des Moines

Lawrence

Topeka

Topeka

Wichha

Frankfort

Lexington

Louisville

Baltimore

Ann Arbor

Detroit

Minneapolis

StPaul

St. PaulColumbia

Jefferson City

Butte

Missoula

Boulder City

Las Vegas

Reno

Reno

Reno

SutcliffeBrewster

Brockport

Grahamsville

Hauppauge

Hempstead

Ithaca

Milbrook

North Babylon

Rochester

ShokanSyracose

TroyValhalla

Wantagh

Yorktown

Chapel HiU

Charlotte

Greensboro

Bismarck

Bismarck

Bismarck

Cincinnati

Cuyahoga Heights

Tiffin

Wooster

US Bureau of Reclamation

Idaho State University

Hazardous Waste Research Center

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Indianapolis Department of Public Works

University Hygienic Laboratory, Des Moines Branch

Kansas Geological Survey

City of Topeka

Kansas Department of Health and Environment

City of Wichita

Division of Environmental Studies

Kentucky Geological Survey

Metropolitan Sewer District

Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

University of Michigan

Detroit Water and Sewerage Department

University of Minnesota, Department of Geology and Geophysics

Metro Waste Control CommissionUniversity of Minnesota

University of Missouri

Missouri Department of Health

Montana Bureau of Mines & Geology

University of Montana

US Bureau of Reclamation

University of Nevada - Las Vegas

Desert Research Institute

Nevada State Health Laboratory

Reno-Sparks Wastewater Treatment

Pyramid Lake Fisheries

NYCDEP Brewster Lab

SUNY - Brockport

New York City Department of Environmental Protection

Suffolk County Water Authority

Nassau County Department of Health

Cornell Nutrient Analysis Lab

Institute of Ecosystem Studies

Ecotest Laboratories

Monroe County

New York City Department of Environmental Protection

Onandaga County DDSUSGS-WRD

Department of Environmental Protection

Cedar Creeks Projects laboratory

New York City Department of Environmental Protection

City of Durham Water Resources

Mecklenburg County

City of Greensboro

North Dakota State Health Department

North Dakota State Water Commission

USBOR

USEPA

Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District

Heidelberg College

The Ohio State University

4

Page 8: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 1.- Laboratory participants in the analyses of standard reference samples d September 1996-Continued

State Citv Particioatina LaboratoryOklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Puerto Rico

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

Wisconsin

Norman

Oklahoma City

Corvallis

Tigard

Harrisburg

Somerset

San Juan

Brookings

Chattanooga

Austin

College Station

Seguin

Waterbury

Culpepper

Manassas

Richmond

Seattle

Seattle

Madison

Milwaukee

Oklahoma Geological Survey

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality

USDA-CCAL

Unified Sewerage Agency

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources

Geochemical Testing

Department of Natural Resources

SDSU - Water Quality Laboratory

TVA Environmental Chemistry

Lower Colorado River Authority

Texas A&M

Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority

Vermont Agency of Natural Resources

ESS Labs

Occoquan Watershed Monitoring Laboratory

Consolidated Laboratory Services

Frontier Geoscience

Brooks-Rand, Ltd.

University of Wisconsin, Department of Hygiene

Milwaukee Metro Sewerage District

Middle East Laboratories Location Participating LaboratoryGaza Al-Azar University, Water Research Center Laboratory

Islamic University, Environmental & Rural Research Center Laboratory

Ministry of Agriculture Laboratory

Ministry of Health, Public Health Laboratory

Israel Geological Survey of Israel Laboratory

Israeli Hydrological Service Laboratory

Mekeroth Water Company, Central Laboratory

Water Resources Research Center, Institute for Desert Research

Jordan Royal Scientific Society of Jordan, Environmental Research Center Laboratory

Water Authority of Jordan, Central Laboratory

West Bank Al-Quds University, College of Science & Technology, Water Research Center

Bethlehem University, Water and Soil Environmental Research Unit

Birzeit University, Center for Environmental & Occupational Health Services

______________________________Najah-WESC_______________________________________

Preparation of Standard Reference Samples

All of the SRS used in this evaluation were prepared by personnel of the USGS in Lakewood, Colorado and were analyzed for analyte concentrations and physical property values prior to mailing. A library of reference samples is maintained and can be requested by participating laboratories for use in their quality control programs.

Trace constituent sample T-143 was prepared using water collected from the North Platte River near Windover, Wyoming. The water was pumped through 0.45, 0.2- and 0.1-jam filters, in series, into a 3500-L polypropylene drum. The water was continuously circulated and passed through a 0.1-fom filter and ultraviolet sterilizer for 24 hours. Following this circulation, the water was acidified to pH 1.3 with nitric acid and chlorinated to 5 ppm free chlorine. The trace constituent concentrations were adjusted by adding reagent grade chemicals. The sample was circulated an additional 24 hours prior to bottling.

Page 9: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

polypropylene bottles used were acid leached, deionized-water rinsed, and autoclave sterilized.

Trace constituent sample T-145 was prepared using water collected from the Yampa River near Steamboat Springs, Colorado. The water was pumped through 0.45, 0.2- and 0.1-(om filters, in series, into a 3500-L polypropylene drum. The water was continuously circulated and passed through a 0. l-jom filter and ultraviolet sterilizer for 24 hours. Following this circulation, the water was acidified to pH 1.3 with nitric acid and chlorinated to 5 ppm free chlorine. The trace constituent concentrations were adjusted by adding reagent grade chemicals. The sample was circulated an additional 24 hours prior to bottling. During bottling the sample was pumped through an ultraviolet sterilizer and a 0.1-jam filter. The 500-mL polypropylene bottles used were acid leached, deionized-water rinsed, and autoclave sterilized.

Major constituent sample M-140 was prepared using water collected from the Arkansas River near Avondale, Colorado. The water was pumped through 0.45, 0.2- and 0.1-(am filters, in series, into a 1300-L polypropylene drum. The water was chlorinated to 5-ppm free chlorine with sod^un hypochlorite, continuously circulated, and passed through a 0.1-jjm filter and ultraviolet sterilizer for 24 hours prior to bottling. During bottling the sample was pumped through an ultraviolet sterilizer ard a 0.1-fom filter. The 500-mL polypropylene bottles used were acid leached, deionized-water rinsed, and autoclave sterilized.

Nutrient sample N-51 was prepared using water collected from the West Chicago Creek near Idaho Springs, Colorado. These samples were prepared the week prior to the mailing for this SRS evaluat:on. The water was pumped through 0.45, 0.2- and 0.1-jim filters, in series, into a 600-L polypropylene drum and continuously circulated and passed through a 0.1-um filter for 24 hours. The desired nutr: °:nt concentrations were obtained by adding reagent-grade chemicals. The sample was continuously circulated for 24 hours prior to being bottled. The 250-mL polyethylene bottles used were new, amV% acid leached, and deionized-water rinsed.

Nutrient sample N-52 was prepared using deionized water. These samples were prepared the week pHbr to the mailing for this SRS evaluation. The water was pumped through 0.45, 0.2- and 0.1-pm filters, in series, into a 600-L polypropylene drum and continuously circulated and passed through a 0.1 -jam filter for 24 hours. The desired nutrient concentrations were obtained by adding reagent-grade chemicals. The sample was continuously circulated for 24 hours prior to being bottled. The 30-mL glass vials used were new, amber, acid leached, and deionized-water rinsed.

Sample P-27 was prepared in a 400-L polypropylene drum using water collected from the West Chicago Creek near Idaho Springs, Colorado. The water was pumped into the drum through 0.45, 0.2- and 0.1 -urr filters in series. Desired phosphate and fluoride concentrations were obtained by adding reagent-grade chemicals. Prior to bottling, the sample was continuously mixed for 24 hours while being circulated through a 0.1 -)xm filter and an ultraviolet sterlizer. During bottling the sample was pumped through an ultraviolet sterilizer and a 0.1-jom filter. The 500-mL polypropylene bottles used were acid leached, deionized-water rinsed, and autoclave sterilized.

Sample Hg-23 was prepared using water collected from the Fall River near Idaho Springs, Colorado. The sample was prepared in a 190-L polypropylene drum. The river water was pumped into this drum through 0.45, 0.2- and 0.1-(om filters in series. The water was continuously circulated and passed through a 0.1-jom filter and ultraviolet sterilizer for 48 hours. Nitric acid (5-percent, v/v) and dichromate ion (0.05-percent, w/w) were added to stabilize the sample. The desired mercury concentration was obtained by aiding a mercury standard solution. Following an additional 24 hours of circulation, the sample was bottled. The 250- mL glass bottles and tetrafluoroethylene fluorocarbon resin caps used were new, acid leached, and deronized- water rinsed.

Page 10: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

LABORATORY ANALYSES

The participating laboratories were asked to determine analytes which are summarized in table 2. The number of analytes varied from 28 in T-143 & T-145 (trace constituents) to 1 in Hg-23 (mercury).

Table 2.-Analytes determined in standard reference samples distributed in September 1996

fmg/L. milligrams per liter uq/L. microqrams per liter uS/cm. microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius!

Analyte or propertyAcidity

Alk

Ag

Al

As

B

Ba

Be

Ca

Cd

Cl

Co

Cr

Cu

DSRD

F

Fe

Hg

KLi

Mg

MnMo

Na

NH3 asN

NH3+OrgNasN

Ni

N03+N02 asN

Pb

t)H

PO4 asP

total P as P

Sb

SeSiOn

so4Sp Cond

Sr

Tl

uV

Zn

Acidity as CaCO3

Alkalinity as CaCO3

Silver

Aluminum

Arsenic

Boron

Barium

Beryllium

Calcium

Cadmium

Chloride

Cobalt

Chromium, total

Copper

Dissolved solids

Fhioride

Iron

Mercury

Potassium

Lithium

Magnesium

Manganese

Molybdenum

Sodium

Ammonia

Ammonia + Organic N

Nickel

Nitrate + Nitrite

Lead

Orthophosphate

Phosphorus

Antimony

Selenium

Silica

Sulfate

Specific conductance

Strontium

Thallium

Uranium

Vanadium

Zinc

Unitsmg/L

mg/LMg/L

ug/L

ue/L

ug/L

Mg/L

Hg/L

mg/Lue/L

mg/Lug/L

ug/L

ug/L

me/Lmg/L

ug/Lug/L

mg/L

ue/Lmg/LMg/L

Hg/Lmg/L

me/L

mg/L

Hg/L

mg/LMg'L

unit

mg/L

mg/L

Hg/L

Pg^-

me/L

mg/L

nS/cm

wg^

Mg^

Mg^Mg/Lue^L

T-143.T-145 M-140 N-51.N52 P-27 Ha-23

XX

X

X

X

XX

X

XXX

X

XXX

XXX

X

X

XXX

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X X

X

X

X X

X

X X

X X

X X

X

X

X

X X

XX XX

X

X X

X X

X

X

Page 11: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Laboratories were requested to identify the method used for each analyte according to table 3 analytical method codes.

Table 3. Analytical methods codesCode_____Method_________________________________________

0 Other1 Atomic absorption: direct, air2 Atomic absorption: direct, nitrous oxide3 Atomic absorption: graphite furnace4 Inductively coupled plasma5 Direct current plasma6 Inductively coupled plasma/Mass spectrometry7 Ion chromatography8 Atomic absorption: cold vapor9 Atomic fluoresence

10 Atomic absorption: extraction [specify chelating agents ]11 Atomic absorption: hydride [specify reducing agent ]12 Flame emission20 Titration: colorimetric [specify color reagent ]21 Titration: electrometric [specify reducing or oxidizing agent/color reagent ]22 Colorimetric: [specify reducing or oxidizing agent/color reagent ]40 Ion selective electrode41 Electrometric \pH and Specific Conductance]50 Gravimetric: [specify filtration, evaporation,and so forth ]51________Turbidimetric________________________________________________

Participating laboratories were also asked to use the references listed below to further define the methods.

1. American Public Health Association and others, 1992, Standard methods for theexamination of water and wastewater 18th ed: Washington, D.C., American Public Health Association, 981p.

2. American Society for Testing and Materials, Annual book of ASTM standards: Philadelphia, v. 11.01, and v. 11.02.

3. Kopp, J.F., and McKee, G.F., 1979, Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes:Cincinnati, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 600/4-79-020, rev. 1983, 460 p.

4. Fishman, M.J., and Friedman, L.C., eds., 1989. Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments (3d ed.): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 5, Chapter Al, 545 p.

5. Miscellaneous manufacturer's instrument manuals or references.

Page 12: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

LABORATORY PERFORMANCE RATINGS

To facilitate interlaboratory performance comparisons, laboratory performance ratings, based on the analyses reported for each SRS, are included in tables 4 through 11 in this report. Averages of the analyte ratings and the number of analyte values reported for each SRS are given for each participating laboratory. Laboratory performance for each analyte is rated on a scale 4 to 0, based on the absolute Z- value, as listed below:

Rating______________________Absolute Z-value_____4 (Excellent) 0.00 to 0.503 (Good) 0.51 to 1.002 (Satisfactory) 1.01 to 1.501 (Questionable) 1.51 to 2.000 (Poor)._________________Greater than 2.00

Overall laboratory performance ratings greater than 2.4 are considered satisfactory. Overall laboratory performance ratings between 2.0 and 2.39 are considered marginal; those less than 2.0 are considered poor.

STATISTICAL PRESENTATION OF DATA

Data in this report have been evaluated using nonparametric statistics as described by Hoaghn and others (1983). This statistical approach is a resistant statistic because the median is not influenced by outliers as is the mean in traditional statistics.

Analytical data for each analyte are presented in tabular and graphical forms in tables 12 through 18. Tabulated data for each analyte include the laboratory code number, reported values, analytical method, most probable value (MPV), number of reported values - excluding less than values (N), data range, Z- value, and the F-pseudosigma. (The Z-value is equivalent to the Z-score of traditional statistics, being the number of deviations the reported value is from the MPV. The F-pseudosigma is equivalent to the standard deviation (a) of traditional statistics when the data has a Gaussian distribution.) If an analyte has a sufficient number of determinations by a given method^ usually 7, the F-pseudosigma for that analytical method is reported in the block of data listed for each analyte.

The median value is considered the MPV. Reported values of "less than" are used to establish the median, but are not considered in detennining the data range. The median (midpoint) divides the ordered data into halves and is designated the MPV. The hinges include the middle 50-percent of the data and are the mid-values of the upper and lower halves of the data. (The hinges are similar to quartiles, but are not mathematically equivalent.) The range of data between the upper hinge (Hu) and the lower hinge (HI), the hinge spread (H-spr), is used to calculate the F-pseudosigma, the laboratory performance rating, the upper warning level (UWL) and lower warning level (LWL), the upper control level (UCL) and the lower control level (LCL). The F-pseudosigma is calculated by comparison of the H-spr value to the Gaussian distribution relation; 67.45 percent of the data "hinges" between plus and minus la, resulting in a H-spr of 2 x 0.6745 = 1.349a, This relation allows the calculation of the F-pseudosigma = (H-spr)/1.349. Laboratories reporting "less than" values are not performance rated unless their reported "less than" values are greater than two Z-values from the MPV.

The graphical plot of the reported data is shown in figure 1. The upper and lower boundaries of the graphical plots generally are +3 and -3 F-pseudosigma deviations from the median. (Computer-program

Page 13: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

scaling constraints do not permit these boundaries to always be graphed at exactly these values.) The graphical plot is a box plot/control chart with reported values grouped by analytical method in ascenc^ng order of value. Lines designate the MPV, Hu, HI, and the (UWL) and (LWL) at +2 and -2 F- pseudosigma, respectively. "Less than" values are not plotted. The analytical data are presented in ways that allow participants to evaluate data distribution, scatter, outliers, central tendency, bias, skewness, and method relationships.

50 --

45 -^. _____________ | +2 F-pseudosigma (LWL) [_ _i_ _______

40 --

35 --

30 :

25 -

20 -

t)

+3 F-pseudo sigma (UCL)

-2F-pseudosigma (LWL) ______ __

-3 F-pseudosigma (LCL)

NOTE: vertical scale is 1he concentration value of 1he individual analyte in appropriate units (see table 2.) Methods shown are

defined in Tables 3 and 12 through 1 g.

Figure 1 .-Statistical parameters shown on reported-data graphs

REFERENCE

Hoaglin, D.C., Mosteller, F., and Tukey, J.W., eds., 1983, Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 447p.

10

Page 14: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 4. Overall laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water samples distributed in September 1996{Lab, laboratory number; OWR, overall weighted rating for all sample types; OLR, overall laboratory rating for reported values of a sample type; V/94, number of reported values of 94 total possible values from all sample types; V/28, V/28, V/16, V/5, V/5.V/11 ,V/1 are number of reported values possible for T-143,7-145. M-140, N-51.N-52, P-27and Hg-23 respectively]

Standard reference sample = oT-143 : : : : : Lab OWR

1 3.5 2 1.7 3 1.8 4 3.15 3.0 7 2.6

10 3.3 11 2.8 13 2.8 15 1 Q

16 2.8 18 3.3 19 3.2 21 3.0 22 3.323 2.7 24 2.9 25 2.5 26 3.4 28 1.5OU O.I

32 3.4 33 3.0 34 3.635 3.5 36 1.4 38 3.4 39 2.4 40 2.4 42 2.343 3.6 46 3.0 48 2.4 50 2.6 51 2.753 1.5 55 2.8 56 22 57 2.0 58 1.759 3.2 64 3.6 68 2.2 69 2.9 70 3.473 2.6 75 3.5 76 2.8 80 2.3 81 2.783 3.4 85 3.1 86 3.3 87 2.0 88 1.289 3.0 90 1.8 91 3.4 92 3.6 96 3.097 2.9

102 1.8 104 3.7 105 3.1 107 3.1108 2.6 109 2.5 110 2.9 113 3.1 114 2.4

V/9490 18 86 2949 59 37 72 61 7080 66 33

6 3

53 47 55 73 4649 67 42

72

59 27 27 48 7225 70 74 25 156

32 18 18 3446 23 71 48 5522 51 26 30 7651 52 55 58

676 6

10 14 4272 63 12 81 44

5 43 11 71 31

..OtR.

".-'& -.

OX2BOOOO: : : 2* : : :XO-SflXOO

o-:-.3.2x-:;

ooossxoo- xoo:ox-x

:'x2J:-v- : : : xo3.;3.-x-o:

,-.-32oo-,

ox?-?;:;:

.o:o1-.3.-ox-

;-;:3.6x;: :

' 32-.:

v'^-vxo

OX22- . - : . 2.9 : . 3.3X0

2.7 3:3 2.7 x 2.8 22

,;X3.6

x:3:4: ;:: X2.6 :

Xo 2;5: -: .2.7 T-8

3.0 2:6

2.03.2

.2.1

. .V/28,;.;.;.;.;i8;

:-X:-:-:-TO-

ooxoo23: oox : : : «.0-OX-X25 0000-X23

.-. . . . .2-7.

,,, 43 xoxoxl:

oxo^xis ,0x024

::;>£xoxoto'

;..;..; 18

;"',': 19. xo-25 ' '''; 22

; Y 3

: ooo-i ff

. ':'::' Q

xo:-:025 :f8

xoo.11 '." ' ' 21.

o:x;xlp

x: 21-.-.,. -15 -X-X-17

::-:o -21 :,: : :18

: :;: . -22

' ' '' ' '. 2.

oo-ox-13

25: .22; x : x :: '-1

25 11

11. XX 4.-.-.; 21

: 12

T-145OLR3.4

1.5 32O.*T

2.5 2.8 23 2.8 1.62.7 3.6 3.3

2.4 2.8 22 3.5 1.525 3.6 2.4 3.73.0 0.8

2.1 2.03.4 3.1 2.8

2.7

1.03.5

1.9 2.9 3.32.5 3.6 2.8 2.6 2.33.6 2.8 3.2 1.3

2.9

3.5

2.93.1 1.8 3.0 3.4 3.1

2.5

3.2 1.7

V/2828

25 17 2319 8 26 222027 20 6

14 11 24 16

26 10 31

20

16 267

21 21

3

821

2418 1611 19 97 2216 13 21 18

21

2

1324 23

1 2511

11

217

JV£f4QXOO.-.-bLXR.v.v.

:x:MS

ooOoo4#ooo-

0000022x00

X-X-X1-X7X-: x : : : *?-::-

xooo^vSoOOo

-:-x-:-3;0:-x-

:-x-:-:4:Ox:-.

; o: :x2:3::x : '

:x :x;3:4,x : :

.x-x-,1>8,-x-

xooxix8-: :x:

ox' :2;2.x:' xo-3.2;.;;.

IS

2.6 X 3.5 :

3.7 XX 2.6 :;.; 1',* ..

::3:0 ' X'3.1. '

' : : : : 3.3 .

3.D ...1,0

3,8 3.32.7 1-5

X 2.93.5 X

2.8

2.9 3.6

W16.O.vOllB;.

. .v.vXZ-. .-.-. . ly.-

000000-60

xoo-12- XO--12:

::-o:14.

o-xooolo

., ..13: :oxooo7: :

11 10

xooxo7:

: oilx-0'12::":''0: :: xo'8'

;.;.;:; 9;

12oxoo-7

: .13 to

10X-,, 5

12.

912

.12

13: :: :-4

'..-6'7

14 10

. 14;: 11: - ii

14 8

N-51

OLR3.0

2.5

0.5 2.0 3.8 2.7

0.02.2 2.8

3.6 2.00.0

3.0

0.0

3.0

3.02.0

3.03.5

1.0 2.8 3.3

1.03.3 3.5 2.3

4.0

3.33.0 3.4

2.8 1.33.0 4.0 3.5 3.7 3.32.8 2.7 3.4 3.3

4.0 4.0 4.0

V/53

4

2 14 3

25 4

5 1

4

2

1

5 3

2 4

3 4 4

43 24

1

315

4 34 1 23 34 3 5 3

1 1 1

:xN32x xbtR-x XV/5X-.

xo-S^oo-x-x-xS:;:-.:-

///Zi.Uv.Y,V.V.V.V.*.Y.

xoMvoXvoxS:;-:;:

OX20&OX x-,35,:-.

-x-4:Q-:--:

:-x-2S-:-x-

oxsi&ooj

X00.3X-X

;:-2»:::-

X03.&:;:

oxi:.4 :xo

iigl00:3.4 x-

2?2.$2:8

' 2A-:

;;:3!3:-x

x3:8x-:x32:.

:4.o: 3.0 3.03,3

V ,2.6'V

xoo5x;x.X-X4XO-X

. .-.-. 4- .Y :

,::-,2- :-.-::-.

xiSx-?

xo:: 3:'o: :

:-:-:o-5-x-:-xMM

.--.-3- -

oxoSoxo:

OoooS-':;::

,;,A.,,

:oo---'5-' -: .

X; OgXOO-;

.-,,-5-.'.'.- .

3 "00-5--''

xo3x-x-

o: o:4,o. .

5 ' '

x-:. 5 ,-:.:y'5'--:' ..".5 '."

x;: :4-: '-0.4-: :

i^"

P-27

OLR3.8 2.0 2.0

2.3 3.8

3.7

3.1 3.4 1.5

3.6

2.5 3.6 22

2.4

3.3 1.9

1.93.5 3.9

3.43.2

3.4

3.0

2.9 3.6

2.6 3.3 3.0

V/119 8 9

5

9

6

8 9 4

8

47 5

5

7 9

94 8

106

10

2

87

10 6 8

1*K23Xxot-Ro:xooo-iooo; .-.-.-. .O.-.--.-.-

XOO-3X-X-X

OOX3XOXO

o-xo-3-xo-x

,o-x4.;:-x- xooooxooo-

oxo^x;:

:-x:-3-x-xo

: ' 4: ' :'

: : :*: : : : x-'4:x- o-dx:x;oooosx :

. "-4-xo

:%p.

oxos'v-

-, -,-. .

-0:xo

3 .

.vX;4 XX

. ;:? .-: ..p ..

;&

X-.WJ-Xvo;x-ixo-ox

xoool oooo; oooo-^oooxx;xl;:;x;

xoxi::o;:;. .-. .- 1 . . .-. .OXOolXOOOO

0000-1 :ooo-:o

:oxoo1,ox;::

:-:xo1-:;x-:-

s?s

SB :x-ol:-x-x-::$; l-.o.

-.-. .-. 1. :;: :.

--X10XO-

oooolx;:-.

Wif\ :

:-:-:i :--::

:-:-t-x-:x-;:1-,.

:^i?:--. .-.oolo-.-X-

it

11

Page 15: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 4. Overall laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water samples distributed in September 1996 Continued

[Lab, laboratory number; OWR, overall weighted rating for all sample types; OLR, overall laboratory rating for reported values of a sample type; V/94, number of reported values of 94 total possible values from all sample types; V/28.V/28, V/16, V/S.V/5,Vfl 1,Vfl are number of reported values possible for T-143.T-145, M-140, N-51.N-52, P-27 and Hg-23 respectively]

Standard reference sample = T-i43: : . Lab OWR V/94 :<3LR : : : 118 1.9 35 X0.6 119 3.0 85 v3,0. : 121 3.3 36 x^fcXvX 127 3.1 ** vanw:128 3.0 129 2.3 132 2.5 133 2.8 134 3.7 138 3.4140 2.4 141 2.9 142 2.9 143 3.6 144 2.7145 1.8 146 2.6 149 3.0 151 3.3 155 2.9158 2.4 180 3.4 183 1.5 190 2.4 191 3.2193 2.3 196 3.5 197 3.5 203 2.4 204 2.5212 2.4 213 2.3 215 2.4 217 2.6 218 2.2219 2.7 220 3.0 221 3.0 224 1.9 234 32235 2.0 236 22 240 2.0 241 2.1 243 2.7244 2.9 245 2.4 246 0.0 247 2.7 248 2.0249 1.6 253 1.4 255 3.4 256 1.6 257 1.4258 1.0 259 2.1 261 1.1 262 22 265 32268 2.6 270 0.3 271 1.3 272 0.6 273 1.1274 0.3 276 1.3

68 x-2*x:x 41 :2iO xx 56 X-JRB:XV. 45 x-3il > :.-. 89 xM':':: 'xOC :. « . «Y.Y.YOO YiJ.V Y.Y

72 ;:3idx-x; 83 -X3;1vX-x 18 XYX--XXX 9 X2.3XXX

78 XXI. 0. X.X 55 vftax-x:: 22 vXvXiXvXy. 54 3.3x:x 23 x-4JJxx:-:56 .25 X..64 X3X4X-X-X13 :o;0 x.70 X2*70 x-33 : : : : :

48 x3/7.'x-X

36 X2;7:x-x 48 X2.3XX80 2.1 X 34 1.8 X79 2:4 x: 69 3:0 18 2.850 .2.7... 40 X3:1XX : 62 X32 .. v. 71 X1X6 78 3.160 .2.4 65 i£ ' ' ' :-64 :x-1 :,7:xx:-80 .1.710 X

7 0.011 v" "

5 0.015 : :. : " 4 ' :%; ::

38 1.4: 19 :05 X 71 35 29 1X8 62 1320 42 15 24 2.020 ' '.. '

77 3.324 .3:312 o:b24 25 X26 o;o57 1:134 0512 :;x :;:" ::

XV728: XtQ

XYX25- :--"-iR .-. . .24

: xx>25. .-. : . : :-8-'' ' ' 14 -X-X27 xxx26x:x-13

x:-x-x4:.X-X23.- "X-W

x:i9YY.--.Yt.

9*

--.-Y-18-: XXX25XYX-IS

ii27

;x : .12X-..24 xx ::2a ,XY:S

:-xx : 19,- : : : 27X-.23

x:-X25

x :x!8x:" 23.:

xx-x- 5

12:X x-:4

23 .13

: : ' 19

. :'x :xt3

28Y.-..-4-

3 x-X' 4

. 4 X 18

11

T-145 OUR 2.7 2.83.1

2.8 1.7 2.1 25 3.7 3.31.9 2.4 2.9

2.8

2.5 3.0 3.5 1.01.9 3.6 0.0 2.6 3.41.9 3.3

2.3 2.22.3 2.9 2.0 2.7 2.62.8 3.3 3.3 1.83.11.8 22 1.2 1.6

0.0 2.3

1.8 0.8 3.5

0.7

1.5 0.8

3.52.7 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.70.1

V/28 10 26 14

25 9 16 14 27 2613 19 28

423 16 11 19 1

17 18 1

18 2512 21

9 1328 12 24 27519 10 18 19 2722 25 18 23

1 10

12 4 23

19

134

283 34 4 1811

:-OLR.x xv/16:::x:: ::2>7.:.x;xy:-: : : :x-6::

x;':::3;ix:.

XXX3S-X-

by idq fsi o <o IN ;csi <7 < » «

x.x:35::;:

.xxloxx.;X;.y3;,0 :X

" "2J2"-''-

XY-3JO-Xx-x-2.:?.:,

,:x-2;8,.:

27

xVsis-xIvl:

: 2.7

&

x:: 2:d: :':

3;1 ;

193.3

. 2.0

. 0.0.- i:i-xOA 1-1

:0.4 :0.7:

:x:x: ::*

. x-'-l-t:

:-:-'-x-x-:5:

is-:

x : : : -6;

:: -:«.

Fi:

x... : .:§ ;.,.;. 3

-:x:--:-x-6-

16

' :.--.«

Q

;.;';..;-8

XX. . ?

:-:^12

m9

x--x,:5

: 13

15 9

.11 13

9 X--.-. : ' : '3 X-X-. 8

' - :v:X9

X 1212: : :; : :e

N-51 OLR 2.0 3.0

3.53.0 3.8 2.5 3.0 3.6 3.0

10 2.6 3.6

3.5

2.5 3.3 323.0 3.5 2.0 1.8 4.03.0

3.0 3.5 3.03.3 4.0 2.0

2.7 2.8 22 3.3

0.7 3.6 3.0

4.0

4.0

V/5 4 4

224 4 5 5 433 5 5

2

4 3 53 2 2 5 11

2 4 33 1 2

3 5 5 3

3 5 2

1

1

'xNr52:;>x:x:x:x-x: P-27 xotRx: x-:v/5 : :-.- OLR

:-x-2£-:xx-XY:-5x.x-x 3.1

::3i5x:x;x-*XYX

:-x-2-3-xx:-x-:4:x:-x 2.1

xmxxx-x:*:::::: 3.9 ,'x3f^:v.x>:-5:::-: 3.9x-:t-^x-x : : : : *:-: :-: : 22 x-^x-x-x-x-S-:::-:.- 3.5

.-.-.-. a-i-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-S.-.-.-.-.-. ^ 7 w.^t. ....... .V .... w. I

X;3«^" x : : :-.-:- x-.xx 2.8 -0.0- ' .- '4- .-.--. .- 2 8

..2/.6.--X-. . ::-5"-x--: 2.0::-as-:;x-:x-:4x-:-x-: 1.3 ,-x-3;4.x.-.-XY:5x-:x-: 3^ x:-2io;-x-x-:-:3x-:x: 1.7.;xi:j6-x-x:x-:5.-.-.-x-: 3.1 x-,-35::x:x-:-x-2':-xx- 2.2..-25-- - -x-:2XY/^ 3.0

XX-X-X-XYX-X-XX-X-XX 4.0 x ::*0::x ::xx:2Xy:.: 3.5 X-2&-X-XyX#YXv 1.3 .-2 Ji: .-.:.-.: --4: : 2.7 X2:s:-x : -s :

YXi5.,Y:-Xy:4xYX ^ar-yy-Syx;; 2.8

.-:\.$ ..-xxsx-x 2 9.2;4.:--'xx:5xx 2.4

XY2^J-:x-x-:x:-5:-xx. 3.2 ::3^x' ; .' :-'x4'-'x

.-;.Xy -XX.-X;X. . 2.0

'x'^^:.^ : : 3- 1-xS^x:-/.-::-/?:;:- 22

3;0.x: 3 2.0-.-. : : :-:: 4.0

::3X)x:-x',;.2: : : 2.8 2.0 4:

"l[4Y-xx.-5,.x-x 35:XXX' ;-4' :'" :-- 3.7

-- XX-:-X:YX-:XXX 1.3 '-'" ':':;' ..x 2.2: x. o.4

0.9 2.4 2.43.0

. X . 0.3 1.1

.. X .;. 1 o

1.7

XX; ' '-:;;. ; ' 1.8

V/11

9

7

9 99 10

3

9 5

387 3 10 61 3 2 3 6

9

7 7

10

5

8 9 22

6

67 109

7 978 3 8 9 9

6

:QLRX:XVHXX

x-:x:4:-x : ;: : M xxx :

YX-^XXXX-X-XI-X-XY xx-s'xx-x-xx-ixx-x- XX-S-XXXYX-XtXX-X-

x::-2-x:x-:;x-:i:::::v

XY.-:2x;xyXYXTx;x: X^XXXYYX-tXY-X XY^XYX-X-XYI-XX-X

. . -../. .-. . . . . .-.'. . . .

:x-:3x:x;x;.-i-x:x-.XOX-XY------I-X--XvX?vXv^ vtv':;x

y'^v^fe

>:-. : -3:: xxxx :1xxx

-;..;2XYvYX :Xll:X : X : :

:ff:m^i.

:S::;*>

12

Page 16: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 5. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)

(MPV.most probable value; ugA, micrograms per liter, mg/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute 2-value 0.00-0.50 0.51 -1.00 1.01 -1.50

Rating 1 (Questionable) 0 (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51 -2.00 greater than 2.00

Analyte = Ag {Silver) MPV= 1?-8 fig/L

F-pseudosigma = : : : :T:4 :Lab

1 3 4 7

1011 13 15 16 1819 21 23 24 2526 2830 32 3334 35 36 39 4042 43 46 48 5051 55 58 64 6869 70 73 75 7680 81 83 85 8687 89 91 96 97

102 104 105 107 109110 113 114 118 119121 127 128 129 132

OLR3.6 1.7 2.8 2.6 2.83.0 2.6 2.2 3.2 3.53.2 0.0 2.9 2.62.13.3 1.5 3.2 3.6 2.73.3 4.0 1.3 2.5 2.23.0 3.4 3.2 2.2 2.12.7 2.7 2.4 3.0 2.22.9 3.3 2.7 3.3 2.72.8 2.2 3.6 3.2 3.42.6 2.8 3.5 2.5 2.71.8 4.0 3.0 2.6 2.12.0 3.2 2.1 0.6 3.03.2 3.0 2.8 2.0 2.8

V/2828 26 10 23

625 23 21 27. 2213

1 15: 20 152416 21 26 10

3 1

18 11 1925

7 : 22 2211

3 10

9 3

2518 19 11 21 10

8 21. 15 17 2118 22

2 13. 2522

1 25 11 114

2112 10 2616 24 25

9 16

RV19,6 15.0

21.6

21.0 20.1 17.6 19.9 20.9

222

15.6

. 19.0 19.9

13.0 2CL2

: : 19.319.0

: 2b.G 20.0; :

210;

40.019.8 18.7 47.0 20.1 : T9.4

;X20:Q:x.

26.0 x1-9:1

: :20.4 :. 19.0143.0:

17.9 20.0

18.1 18.0

6.7 16.5

18.8 19.5

Rating.4

: : ox

2

3. 4

1 :

4 3

1

. 0

3 4

0 4 4

;. . 3 -

: : v:: :4 - .. : :-'-.- -4 :x

3; :

b.4

' -' 3. : '.:1

' 4

: "4

: : 4-

0. 4

xx:x: 4.x: 3.0

2 4

'. 2 2

. 0 0

: 34

Al (Aluminium)

22.1 ug/L 8.3

RV19.1

206.0 <2000

37.6

22.2 <50

18.5 <100

<50

18.2 32.3

22.6 100.0

<200

23.0

18.5

17.0

54.516.5

<100

<30 20.2

<6 <25

<100

23.1

25.720.0

21.1 23.0

20.2

<2000 19.5

<30

18.7

49.0

Rating4 0

NR1

4 NR 4

NR

NR

4 2

40

NR

4

4

3

03

NR

NR 4

NR NR NR

4

44

4 4

4

NR4

NR4

0

As (Arsenic) 15.2 ng/L 1.2

RV16.2 14:3

< t20 16,015.0 15.5

< 100 15.4 14.6

20.5

14.9

14.0 14.9

15.6

11.0 18.2

15.0

13.5. X14.2, :

14.0

19.0

9.616.2 15.3 2210 14.6 16.516,3

"1B--P,

15.314.9 1:6,4:

14,6 -i?;o15.8

15.3

13.1

17.5

17.9 15.0

14.4 14.8

Rating3 3

NRx 3

4 4

NR 4 4

0.

4

34

4.

0 0

...4 :; 2"': "-

:; ; 3. ,.-. 3

0

. 0 -.3

x-x :x4 . .-0. 4 23 3

4.4

... .2

4 13

4

1 '.- .

1

0 4

:3 4

B (Boron) 35.0 ng/L

5.2

RV34.9 30.0

37.0

<50

57.1 <50

30.7

26.1 42.2

36.0

22.7 <100

140.0

<50

35.6 36.9

32.0

35.7 30.0 95.0 26.5

Rating4 3

4

NR 0

NR

3

1 2

4

0 NR

0

NR

4 4

3

43 0 1

Ba (Barium) .81.9 : : : ;>ig/L : : : : :

x 4.5 ;.;:: :-

RV82.2 84.4 87.0

. 83.6

.81.0 88.1 77.9 . 82.2 79.082.2 .

78.8 84.480.9 85.1 : 80.0 .77.9

102.0

90A 79: t. : 78.1

85:0: ; 97.8

: : 90.0

78:2 ::

83.0

^ 8Z3- : :"

81,2'::

: mo: 77.8.,

X.83.2 81.590.7 98. f .':.

«=100 : ;69.G

. 94.0

76.2 77.0

80.2

84.081.0 75.8 70.1

Rating' .4

: 3-.2

' 4

4- ;- .2:

.-. ; 3. -;:: : . :. 4. ' ' ' -'$

:-, :4y. ::.

x'3 x-; 34.

: .-,3'x : '. 4x::. 3

o ; - :

: ;xxxt: :-: ,XX:7-3 ' : -X:: 3 .

:: .;: : -3" -x-xxxvO : : . . .y:.-

.. :3':'

. -4 '

: : : >x -:v4

. 4- .

- . ,-:3 - vX::/ '.3' : . - .4 :- x-. vv4 .

: '- :-;1. : ' : ; . ; .,:0..'MR ' ' '

Q.0

"... 2:.-: '-.:" ' 2

...4'..

''' 4 '

4 : ::: : . 2'-: '

0.

Be (Beryllium) Ca <Galc;um) . 8.50 ng/L 53:7: :mg/L: 0.66 2:2 : '

RV8.13 8.00 9.00 8.10

8.40 8.74 8.60 7.70 8.50

9.908.66

7.30 9.40

10.00 9.50 7.90

8.76 10.00

8.907.32 8.67

8.50 9.68

7.00 8.20 9.17 8.25

7.40

10.00 8.998.00

7.30

8.78

7.728.00 6.53 7.54

Rating3 3 3 3

4 4 4 2 4

04

1 2

0 13 .

40

31 4

4 1

0 4 24

1

0 33

1

4

23 0 2

RV52.5 54.4 :

X53.4-, '.

; 55.8

56:3

:;59:0 : 50.6

54.0 53.S53.6 :

; '525;r53:4: : 54.853.8 55.4 : :

.54.0. . 55:0 54.2

52.0

.5S;7x: V:;54.:0.-..'

X5&.0 .55:,9:: :

ix:54:9x::

x-56:5-:'52.4: 55:4: ;

;''-v53:3"v

vS3:Jd::: 53..1.::

: 55.4 :55.5 :

.: 51^ .

:52.6 :

:::51.S: ; 58.0

:. 52.8 : :; 5ZQ .-:

:: 52:5:X55.0 57.9 :; 44.0

X53.7: 52.2 :

:.55:7 : 58:0 53,4

Rafihg4

X .4 4 3

20

: .-.,2..,. 4

-,-:- 4 :::;.. . -.-.A.

'.XX 3: :- *. .

3-

4 : . : : 3' : :- :

4 : 3 :; :.'-' '4 '

X X 3 ;..;

;X 2;;-,.. .'.'.' .. 4"' :

:: , 2 : ; : .:: 2

: :: : ;.3--x:

v. 2

'. *":

' " 4 '

':- : x: 4 -4

. 1 . 1 :

x;x"--3:..:v.... 3 ...

2;..:-: . . 4 : .

3.. 1

...4' " "'3

. 43

.-. 1 .x: ,xx0" _

'.' . 4 '3

' 3. 1 4

13

Page 17: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 5. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents) Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ng/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liten Lab, laboratory number OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51-1.001.01-1.50

Rating 1 (Questionable) O(Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51-2.00 greater than 2.00

Analyte = A& (Silver) Al (Aluminium) As (Arsenic) B (Boron) MPV= 19.8 pg/L 22.1 ng/L 15.2 ng/L 35.0

Ba (Barium) Be (Beryllium) Ca <Calcium) 81:9 jig/L 8.50 ng/L 53.7 mg/L

F-pseudosigma =Lab133 134 138 140141142 144 145 146 151155 158 180 183 190191 193 196 203 204212 213 215 217 218219 220 221 224234235 236 240 241 244246 249 253 255 256257 259 261 265 268270 271 272 273 274

OLR3.1 3.8 3.3 2.9 3.03.1 2.3 1.0 2.9 3.34.0 2.5 3.4 0.0 2.43.3 2.3 3.7 2.7 2.32.1 1.8 2.4 3.0 2.82.7 3.1 3.2 1.6 3.12.4 1.8 1.7 1.7 0.00.0 1.4 0.5 3.51.81.3 1.5 2.0 3.3 3.30.0 2.5 0.0 1.1 0.5

V/2814 27 26 13 2228

4 23 18 19

1 . 16 20

1 1825 15 21

9 1427 12 24 28

521 10 18.. 19 2723 25 18 23

15

12 4

23 13'

19 13 4

28 43 4 4

18 11

1.4

RV19.6 19.0 20.6

29.019.3

<10

17.9

19.9

22.4

19.0 19.5

14,0: 19.2 28.0 :20J

.22.1

20.620,0 14.5:

18.3

16.0

19.9 25J417.0 21.0

2Q-2

33.0

Rating43 3

04

0 2

: ' 4 ' : '1

3 4

0 4 03.

1

34 0

2

0

4 01

X;.. .3

4

0

8.3

RV

22.9 20.0

<100

27.3

58.3 <200

18.1

<40.6

16.722.0

22.0 18.6 24.621.0

137.0 53.1

29.0

27.8 0.0

17.915.0 29.7

181.0 15.2

45.5

15.0

110.0

26.9

6.0

Rating

4 4

NR3

0 NR 4

NR

34

44 44

0 0

3

3 0 33 3 0 3

0

3

0

3

1

1.2

RV16.5 14.0 14.0

15.015.2 14.5 27.4 15.1 14.1

<37.1

t5.417.0 13.0 15.5

15.116.0 13.9 15.0 157

14.6 14.715.5 17:2

<35

14.4

19.1

14.6

16.7

RatingZ3 3

44 3 0 4 3

NR

41 1 4

43 2 4 4

4 4 41

NR

3

0

4

2

5.2

RV

35.8 28.8

24.135.7

35.4

38.0 32.4

34.0

<50

106.0 40.2

35.0

33.230.0 29.2 28.0

36.0

34.7

58.0

Rating

4 2

04

4

3 4

4

NR

0 2

4

43 2 2

4

4

0

4:5

RV77.7 78.9 80:5

84.881.8

90.9 82.2 84.2

82.0 79.0

41.0

82-2

87.692.0

82.0 82.4

eao

64.5 >

84.088.0. .79.6 72.0 92.3

80.5

74:o :

77:o'

Rating3

' ' 3.

4

34

.1

43 :

4' '-' 3-

.0 .

: :-:- :4 ' 2

..: . °

. 4 4

4

0 : : :: -4 ' ;

2 3 0 0

4

: .v.-1 ;

2

0.66

RV8.70 8.51 8.65

8.158.87

<0.01 9.50 7.23 8.16

9.30 8.60

8.89 8.00 8.85

9.80 8.87 8.10 8.40

12.60 8.388.00 7.90

6.70

8.27

8.70

Rating4 4 4

33 0 1 13

24

3 3 3

1 3 34

0 433

0

4

4

2.2

R753.0 54.5 54.9 54.5 56.2 '

53.3

59.1 50.0.

: 54.7:'-54>T'

. 53.3: 53.1 : 51.8>

47.8 53:2:

.:v56.5- ;;;'

.55.3: 50:2: ; 52:050.0

: 55.0 55.1 51:3 55.559:0 52:5 47:6: 44:8

32.7 :

52.8

51.0 ;

57.1 54.1. :

: 53.348.3

: . -53.9 : ::: :

. :23.7.

. ; :56:9 : : b.o :

Rating-.4-

:: ,. ; .:4' 3:' : ' : 4':

24

o...I-'""

, : '4,.' :"" . A-''''-

':' 4'.';. -4:--

:: : ;.;> 3x:.::,

: '0: v: : ' :

. : ; : :4:::';: : :-. -:2 . -.

:: : . 3.--:'-: . " .1

: 3:;1 : : .3 .3 . :

. : : : :-/:-: : : :2;:: .;: : : : :3 -: :

o .y- : 'x4- .'.. : "- . : :0 ;v\: :::o v: :

o

4

. 2

: : : :' : i:: ' : : ;. ::- : :\ 4.:'.. . 'A:.' '

0: /' ::;: ;:4.:

o2

;.. : : : ;:o:'

14

Page 18: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 5. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents) Continue'!

(MPV.most probable value; ng/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number, OUR. overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value, <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value 0.00-0.50 0.51-1.00 1.01-1.50

Rating 1 (Questionable) 0 (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51-2.00 greater than 2.00

Analyte = Cd (Cadmium) Co (Cobalt) Cr (Chromium) Cu (Copper) Fe (Iron) MPV= 19.1 |ig/L 17.0 ng/L 37.0 : jig/L 22.3 ng/L 222

F-pseudosigma = 1 .5 1.2 . 2;6 1.9 . 14Lab

1 347

101113 : 15 16 1819 21 23 242526. 28:

30 32 3334 35 36 394042.: 43 46 48 5051 55 58 64. 6869 70 73 75 7680 ...

81 83 85 8687 89. 91 96 97

102 104 105 107 109:

110 113 114 118 119121 127 128 129 132

RV.20.1 19.5

<100 21.0

:19.Q17.4 15.0 19.7 1.8.719.8

18.8 '17.7: '

21.020.4 13.619.5 18.6

19.0 18.0 18.6

18.6 18.0

20.0

19.520.0 . 18.2 19.0 49.2

13,9 : .2Q.Q

18.5 . 19.6 17.7.21:020,3

17.5 : 19.3.21,0

19.1 19.0

6.4 18.418.0 17.4 19.5

18.5

Rating3

NR 2

4 2 0 444

4 3 23 0 44

43

. .4

43,.-

. 433 4;.

4 .

0 3 4 4 323

2 42

-;. . 4 .;

4 4 0 43 2 4

4

RV17.4 15.0

<100 19.9

18.0 12.6 <20 16.9 16.1

12.3

16.4

17.0 17.2

15.220.0

17.4 <50 16.0

18.0

<50

18.9

16.8

17.8

17.220.0

15.5

15.916.0 17.3 17.0

17.0

Rating4 1

NR 0

3 0

NR4 3

0

3

4 4

10

4 NR3

3

NR

1

4

3

40

2

33 4 4

4

RV35:5 39.0

<100 38.1

36.0 38.5 35:1 34,2 36.337.8

35.0

37.037.5

37.0 37.3

37.0 28.0 32.538.0

35.8 41.8 36.0

37.0

38.536.0 37.1;

.33.0 . 37.1 36.3

41.0 37.2 38.4 29.238.2 36.0

38.9 39.041.0

32.9

38.1

44.8 35.0

39.2 32.4

40.5

Rating3 3

NR4

4 3

244

.3 '

0 44

4 4

4 0 14

4 1

. 4

4

. 34 4 ' 1

4 4

1 4 3 04 4

3

1

1

4

0 3

3 1

2

RV

22.224.0 23.0 23.4 22.824.0 10.4 21.3 21.8 22.316.0

23.9 16.2 21.023.4

7.8 22.5 23.2

10.0

21.322.0

22.4 19.7 24.0

20.8 <50

27.021.4 22.8 22.0 22.2

22.0 22.0 23.0 25.2 23.121.0 21.4

23.4 21.222.0

22.4 24.8

23.5 21.0

7.9 26.018.0 22.419.2 30.0 42.0

Rating43 ... 4 "

3 430 4 44 -,:-0

3 0 33 04 :4 ::

0

44

4 23

3 NR

04 4 4 4

4 4 4 1 43 4

3 34

4 2

33 0 10 4 1 0 0

RV

211 261 235 225 246202 207 208

.200 222227152 .

. 218 .

222 202

470: 365 ' ::

250 :

: 216 '

250

21224 230 222160 :

: 251

222 210

225226 214 221 214

223220 219 224213212244 212 248 233244

213 200 256

223 204

226210 220 205185 228

K (Potassium) .| jtg/L 2.50 mg/L :

0.21Rating

.;;..; 3.

3-::-: 4 ..

2: : : 2 :

2 1 44

> o .. 4'

"'!. ,4 . 2 : ''

: : ::-, 4

:: . 0 : : : : . -0- -:

. 1

' ... 4 1

Y.O

4

40

4:,. 3 .

4- ..-.. -3. v: .-

3

4 '

4 4 331

: T' 3:'

1

3-.1.

o :

4 2

43 4 2 0

' 4

RV

2.555.40

2.84

2.50 2.38 2.28 2.10 2.402.50

2.44 2.34 2.642.49 2.32

2.50 2.54

1.80

2.322.50 2.30 2.62 2.51

2.48

2.57 2.802.72 2.43

2.37 2.50 2.82 2.582.42 2.35

2.542.50

2.47 2.63 2.51

2.40 3.00

3.202.55 2.68 2.11 2.40 2.64

Rating4 0

1

4 3 21 44

4 3343 :

4 4

0

34 33 4

4

4 224

34 2 44 3

44

4 3 4

40

04 3 14 3

Li (Lithium):;: :/: 18.0 ng/i-

. RV16.6;

: 26.o:<100

.19.4 '

,4.5;

V24:4:

18.0 :: 17,7 '

16:017.2:

16.7

22.2 18.019.2 .

' ::19,7;: : :: ... 18.3

17.5

15.7

19.4

16.5

Ratim3

' ':': 0

: NR " ' 3''":

W,

' ^ -' O : : : --. '-: 4

. ..'4 :

3.0

::: '^:' ;

.v.3..-

: : :: 3 ' '.4.:.

: :r

2

: .3

3

15

Page 19: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 5. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)-Contin'jed

(MPV.most probable value; ng/l_ micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported vak-«s; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =

Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Cd (Cadmium),: : . 19.1:; : ;:ng/L

1.5 ' -..:'

Absolute Z-value 0.00-0.50 0.51-1.00 1.01-1.50

Co (Cobalt) 17.0 ng/L

1.2

Rating 1 (Questionable) O(Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Cr (Chromium) 37,0: ng/L

2.6

Absolute Z-value 1.51-2.00 greater than 2.00

Cu (Copper) 22.3 ng/L

1.9

Fe <lron): :: : 222 t*9/L ;

K (Potassium) y: (LitMium) .:.,,'.. 2.50 mg/L 18,0: : : :pgl- . 0.21 :-:2/T : -:: : : :,:

Lab RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV .Rating RV Rating RV Rating133 134 138 140141142 144 145 146 151155 158 180 183 190191 193 196 . 203 204212 213 215 217 218219 220 221 224 234235 : 236 : : 240 241 244246 249 253255 : 256257 259 261 265 268270 271 . 272 273 274

19.9 . :18.8 19.0

: :::2b.O:: 19.820.0 .

22.3 18.6 13-.6 :

8^8 1.9.6 .;-:

20.7 v :;

18.6 20.0 19.2

23.0 21.4Vg.'b''17.1 .;'

18.0

19.6 13.9 19.7 :20.0

17:0 ;

. ::2Q;3 :..

16.0

.19.6 : 20.4

26.0 14.0 :

20.0

16.0 7.4 :

: 3 v. 4 4' 3;;.'

43

o4

/' 4 ;;.

. Q : 4

': : :: : 2: : . * ::

347

0... 1. '

42

3

404 ;;..3

: : ' : 2

' ":'3

,: :o

A .-:. . ^.-.0o .

3

0 0

16.7 15.1

16.216.3

24.2 16.2

17.1 17.3

17.6

17.3

17.0 18.7 19.0 16.8

16.0

16.0 15.9 17.419.0 13.9 15.0

17.2

23.0 10.0

17.8

8.0

4 1

33

0 3

44

3

4

4 2 1 4

3

3 341 01

4

00

3

0

34.3 36.2 38.7 35.0 36.735.4

42.1 36.4 34.7

25.6 ;36.8

39.438.4 36.0 34.5

. 47.033.0 44.5 35.0 37.6

34.0

37.7

41:6 X

40.0. 35:1

. 34.0

42.4 40.2 36.0 40.052.0 34.0

37.0

38.0

2 4 3

\ 343

1 4 3

0 4

33 4 3

01 0 3 4

2

4

12 3

2

1 24 20 2

4

4

19.5 22.4 20.1 26.0 23.320.0 20.2 33.2 25.2 22.1

25.8 23.3

22.222.326.0 23.7 18.7 11.726.0 23.2 30.4 23.9

19.0

21.3 21.5 23.620.0 18.7 21.0 19.7

21.7 30.0 21.7 23.628.0 25.0

23.0

22.0 4.2

2 4 2 132 20 1 4

1 3

44 1 3 1 01 4 0 3

1

4 4 32 1 3 2

40'

4 30 2

4

4 0

223218 224 237200221 .

21B : 220 200228 222 222

192221

220208260 302 224 230

208 222220201 .-: 224235 215 184- ..; 264

188 : 330

: 217 221170

230

230 232

4. .4 : ..

: : ; A 2 14

4 4 1

-.4. ,:-4 - : ' 4 .

: :Q .-.4

" 4

,-.'2 : ' ::-.:-0..' .'. 'o'-..

.4

3

2 441

: 4 ; .;3

' . 3- ,0 .

- : : : o .'

' ' ' {)': ':

::04'

40

3

3 3

2.48 2.482.51 2.552.22

2.66 2.93

2.32

2.502.47 2.32

2.88 2.402.40

3.10 2.92 2.352.50 2.60 2.61 2.31 2.453.60 2.14

2.54

<0.2 2.68

2.38 3.522.90 2.70 2.35 2.46 2.703.05 2.80 3.00 2.97 2.78

4 4 4 42

3 1

3

44 3

1 44

0 1 34 4 3 3 40 1

4

0 3

301 3 3 4 30 2 0 0 2

1-9.6 ';' :.

19,0

21.1

16.9 :

21.0

1 7-9': : :

19:0;.

17-5

17.0

19.8

13:1

<GL1: '.' '

16.014.0.

18.4

24:0

3

: ; 4 ;;: :

2:'" ' 3."

2

. :: 4,

-.;.;.. 4 ;.

.-. 4.-..

: :.;4-'.:;

3

0 ...:.

' .o.:-'. ::3.- : /

'. 1^-

4

0

16

Page 20: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 5. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents) Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ng/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51 -1.00 1.01-1.50

Rating 1 (Questionable) 0 (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51 -2.00 greater than 2.00

Analyte = Mg; (Magnesium) Mn (Manganese) Mo (Molybdenum) Na (Sodium) Ni (Nickel) Pb (Lead) Sb (Antimony) : MPV= 10.4 :mg/L 18.2 ng/L 36.1 u&i 34.0 mg/L : : : : 71,0: fig/L: . 83.4 ng/L 16:6:,: vgtl ':'-

F-pseudosigma = : .0:5 1.9 4.3 1.6 . 5.0 7.1 f;5 .Lab

1 3 4 7

1011 13 15 16 1819 21 23 24 2526 28 30 32 3334 35 36 39 4042 43 46 48 5051 .

55 58 64-

6869. 70 73 75 7680 81 83 85868789 ;.;.

91 96 97

102104 105107 109110 113 114 118 119121 127 128129 132

RV10.1 10.3 ' ::

10.9 10.8

11.1 10.7 9.8

10.5 10.210.5 :

10.2:

10.3 : 10.010.9 10.8 10.0 10.8 10.3

8.7

10.311.1 10.5 10.5 10.8

8.8 11.3

11.010.1 . 10.5

10.6

10.3:10.1 :10.8 10.4:10.2

. 10;4 :

10.412.5

10.3 10.7 10.4

8.3 10.7 10.0

10.610.0 10.4 10.0 10.0 10.5 .

Rating34 3

. "3:: : '

23

: 24:-.;: . ; 4

4 ..

4 4 33 3. .33 :-'

4

0

424. 4 3

0: 1

23

;:. '4 ...

: : : 4 "

4: . . 3

' ' '3

44

.;.,..;.. 4 '

' ' :- 4

0

4 3 40 3 3

43 4 :

3 3 4

RV17.8 14.7 19.0 18.6 22.018.0 16.7 28.3 18.2

16.518.8

17.8 17.4 22.014.7 25.1 17.0 17.720.0

19.0

14.421.0 20.0 16.2 20.0 21.0

13.0 <50

18.5<20 <20

18.018.1

15.3 17.0 17.4

18.020.5 17.6 17.6 22.0 22.020.0

17.5 20.0 19.3

18.6 20.0

20.018.0 16.7 15.7 20.0 17.0

Rating4 1 4 414 3 0 4 34

4 4 110 3 4 3

4

12 3 2 3 2

0 NR

4NR NR 44

23 4

424 4 113

4 3 3

4 3

34 3 2 3 3

RV34.4 27.0

<500 29.4

37.0

38.3 37.7 37.0

<100 34.0

37.0 26.8 36.0 36.4

37.936.0

36.0 37.6 32.0

30.0

37.0

<50

31.7X:.

28.0

40.535.1

35.4

40.2

12.5

35.1

32.1 31.3

26.0

Rating4 0

NR1

4

3 44

NR.4

40 4 4

4 .4

4 4 3 .

2

4

NR

2

' ;.- 1

24

4

3

0

4

3 2

0

RV33.6 55.0 34.9 35.6

33.8 35.0 31.8 32.8 33.234.3

33.4 33.3 37.834.6 37.3

33.1 33.7

38.0

32.933.9 35.0 35.6 35.2

34.3

33.8 34.532.6 34.2

34.5

32.7 32.9 34.5 35.032.8 33.6

34.530.9

30.8 32.8 34.133.0 29.7 28.0

34.232.0 33.2 32.9 35.034.4

Rating4 0 3 2

4 3 2 3 44

4 4 040

3 4

0

34 3 2 3 .

4

4 43 4

4

3 3 4 33 4

41

1343 0 0

424 3 3 4

RV;71.1 57.0.

<200

79;5

.73.0 64!4

. 75.3 72^9 71.1.84.7

74:0 ; .68.0

74.6 : 31.8

70.0 71.0

62.0 66.0 51.3

. 70.Q

74:2: . 76;4 56.0

11.0.0

74.0 ':58.5 : 70.9

: 73.0 71.1

.. 74:8

:50.0 ;70.6 74.464,5:78.0 67.5

67,669.0.8&.o -.:

.66.7

70.6 70.0 30.0

104.070.0 71.0 64.6

75.0

Rating4 0

NR:' 1y.

. 4 . 2 3 4 4

. 0

: : :3 . ' ' 3- '

3.0

:-: 4 ::4 : : : : v-

13 04

.-;. .3 .2

:: :0 >: ::

: 0

3 '"

04.-

.: : : ;; 4''' v. :,:4''-..;.. -.3. .'

0 4 3 2

: -2.-., 3

.-.-. 3 :. . 4

1

3 .

: : . 4 . 4'-

0 04 4 2

3

RV83.6 88.6

<400 86.5

86.4 89.5 95.6 86.7 83.593.9

78.3 59.8

80.7 17.9 82.0 81.3

74.1

78.0 81.0

83.0

77.0 84.4

92.0

183.080.4 82.2 87.0 97.6 83.383.5 87.0 83.6 76.5 81.078.0 85.2

92.8 81.995.0

87.9

32.0

81.1 72.0 27.9 82.0

87.2 82.8

80.5

Rating4 3

NR4

4 3 1 4 42

30

4o ' 4 : : 4

2

3 4

4

34

2

o :4 4 4 1 44 4 4 3 43 ..:4

241

3 .

0

4 1 0 4

3 4

4

RV15:9 19.0

3.1J3;..

16.8; 15.4 .-

17.2:i6:6::: :14.6

::.<20

17.0 : 16.0 : :

10,0 16.7

' 5.716:0

17.2 12.8

: 9.515.021.2 -..

22,9

: -:^-6

18.7

.15.1

.16.617.0 .

; ;17.0

15.2

15.6 :

16.3

Rat-ng.: :* ; .:., :;

/ ::-::. -P- :

A

. : .:3:': 'A' :.:,;::: ' ^

2

N^:

: i ' ". - /. .

: '. c " t :- ... r.. : : . :*. -

.'.-/:'.. '

'.: '? ' '.

- r :

; r- : .

v . : r::: :

' : /c

^

.:! v.2..-.- : ' ' :-:.;/ .; :' : : *- . :

' -/ " -'-A-'"

: ' '. Z

' A

17

Page 21: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 5. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)~Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ng/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported vf lues; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Analyte = Mg (Magnesium) MPV= : 10.4 mg/L

F-pseudosigma = 0.5 :Lab RV Rating133 9.9 3 134 102 4 138 10.7 3 140 : 11.0 2 141 10.9 3142 10.0 3 144- .: :;,, x:145 11.4 . 1 146 10.1 3151 X155 158 11.1 2 180 X10.6 4: 183 . 190 10.4 : 4191 : 10.7. XX 3 193 9.8 2 196 ::.: : :

203 10.6 ; 4 204 7.6 0212 11.2 1 213 . .. : 215 : 10.6 4 217 : 10.0 : 3 218 10.4 4219 10.0 3 220 10.0 3 221 9.7 X 2 224 10.0 3 234 9.9 3235 10.5 ; 4 236 10.7 4 240 10.2 4241 .. 9.4 1 . 244 :.:246 8.7 0249 . ....... 253" ' .-' ' ' : ; -

255 10.3; 4 256257 8.7 0259 /-:. :; :x.- : x ::261 10.5 : 4 265 10.1 3 268 10.2 4270. 271 . 25.4 ''.' :0 272 : 9.0 : 0 273 X 112 .. 1: 274 17.7 0

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51 -1.00 1.01-1.50

Mn (Manganese) 18.2 ng/L

1.9RV Rating

18.1 4 18.0 4 17.0 3 18.2 419.0 4

20.7 2 17.8 4 16.5 3

19.5 3 18.1 4 22.7 0 19.3 319.0 4

19.0 4 20.0 3 14.0 019.0 4

18.1 4 18.2 4

17.0 3 19.2 3 19.7 3 19.0 4 18.4 418.0 4 16.4 3 18.0 4 17.0 3 31.5 0

18.0 4 19.0 418.0 4

19.0 4

21.0 2 7.4 0

Rating 1 (Questionable; 0 (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Mo (Molybdenum) 36.1 ng/L 4.3RV Rating

37.0 35.9

. 37.338.3

30.6 36.2 38.6

41.0

39.7

36.4 .

38.0

37.0 37.8

27.0

35.4 48.0 34.339.0 19.7 11.0 52.0

36.3

44.0

35.0

4 4

43

2 4 3

2

3

4

4

4 4

0

4 043 0 0 0

4

1

4

Absolute Z-value 1.51-2.00 greater than 2.00

Na (Sodium) 34.0 mg/L

1.6RV

33.7 34.1 42.5 35.434.2

37.1 35.5

34.0

34.033.2 31.6

32.531.236.7

34.5 33.9 31.033.0 31.0 34.1 31.2 33.139.0 32.8

31.0

41.0 35.6

32.8 31.233.0 34.0 40.2 33.0 35.842.2 34.0 50.0 36.2 18.4

Rating

4 4 0 34

1 3

4

44 2

3 11

4 4 13 1 4 1 30 3

1

0 2

313 4 0 3 20 4 0 2 0

Ni (Nickel) 71,0

5.0RV

74.3 69.4 70.0 71.0 69.068.3

86.3 72.4 69.0

76.0 76.0

59.472.2 66.0 70.5 .,:

72.0 91,2 71.0 74.1

66.0

71.2 59.9 74.674.0 65.5 75.0 :: 67.6

69.2

70.9 76.668.0

125:0

73.0

82.0

H9/L

Rating34 44 43

0 4 4

3 3

0 .4 3 4

4 0 4

. 3

3

4 0 33 2 33

..-.A-23 0

4

0

Pb (Lead)83.4

7.1RV

92.0 83.4 77.1 86.0

101.087.0

498.9 84.2 82.8

30.1 92.1

60.882.0 88.0 85.4

82.2120.0 90.0 82.0 90.1

70.0 78.4 84.5

140.3 89.387.0 62.4

131.0 99.2

79.2

83.4 155.091.0 54.0

79.6

65.01.2

Sb (Antimory} ngJL 16,6 t*9/L

,.1.5 '.-'. - :

Rating24 3 4 04

0 4 4

0 2

04 3 4

40 3 4 3

1 3 4 0 34 0 0 0

3

4 020

3

0 0

xRV

16.4 16.8

16.4:19.9

<2Q.

17.2

31,6

15.0 . : : 15.fi

-;. 16.0

8.0

17.0<50

49:7

18:0:: 15:6.

20.4

2.0

16.S

.Rating

ox-. 4..0

NR

ff

xC;f4

x o.-. 3 ,.

4.NR

:.; .o:x : x_ ' ' " 2-v

W° ;''

. 4

18

Page 22: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 5. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)-Continued

(MPV.most probable value; iag/L, micrograms per liter rng/L, milligrams per liter Lab. laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

13 4 7

1011 13 15 16 1819 21 23 24 2526 28 30 32 3334 35 36 39 4042 43 46 48 5051 55 58 64 6869 70 73 75 7680 81 8385 8687 89 91 96 97

102 104 105 107 109110 113 114 118 119121 127 128 129 132

Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Se (Selenium) 9.63 V-9A-1.64

RV8.80 <5

<50 9.40

13.60 7.20 ;

10.40 11.20 8.20

8.92

8.57

12.00 9.67

9.25

5.00: 10.60

12JDO

9.30 : 7:80

9.10 .

10.00

6.259.55

26.00 9.67. ;

9.30

10.9019.40

a.oo

9.70 5.75

19.00

10.30

8.65

8.10 10.40

10.30 10.50

Rating40

NR 40 2. 4 3 3

4

3

2 A

4

0 3

2

4 24

04

NR 0 4

4

.30 3

4 00

4

3

3\ 4

4 3

Absolute Z-vaJue 0.00 - 0.50 0.51-1.00 1.01 -1.50

Si02 (Silica) 23.4 mg/L

1.7

RV22.1 24.4 27.0 23.8

18.1 22.9 25.6

24.1 25.523.3

24.0 22.2

24.8 23.0

23.5

22.4

26.1

23.6 21.3

23.421.2

23.0

22.7 21.2 26.3

25.4 22.8

25.5 23.022.7 21.4 24.0 23.7

Rating3 3 0 4

0 4 2

4 24

4 3

3 4

4

3

1

4 2

4 2

4

4 21

2 4

244 2 4 4

Rating 1 (Questionable) 0 (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Sr (Strontium) 306 fig/

15

Absolute Z-value 1.51 -2.00 greater than 2.00

Tl (Thallium) L 10.0 jig/L

1.0RV Rating RV Rating

301 309 323 303

299

282290

306 324

319

311 308

249299

306

310

309

262

318 301

255356

285

265

295

300 285

4 10.4 4 4 <io NR 24

4 14.0 0 9.8 4 8.0 1

1 10.2 4 2 9.7 4

<5 0 4 2

3

4 9.6 4 4

10.8 3 04 <5 0

10.9 3 7.9 1

4

411.0 3

4 7.8 0

7.4 0

0 53.0 0

3 4

<10 NR

0 iQ.g 30

2

0

3 9.6 4

10.1 44 2

10.0 4

U (Uranium) V (Vanadium) 12.0 ng/L 30.0 jig/L 0.9 3.0:RV Rating RV

10.8. 2 31.1 23.0

; : ..: : < 50 <120 NR 32.4

30.0 39.7 20.8

12.0 4 30.3 28.0

24.0 ' . 23.0

30.0 : . . 30.2

:11.0 : . ; ,2 . 30.0 30.5

: . 27.732.0

32.2 27.7

: 22.0

. ;: : : ; ; ; : : . . 28.3

26.0

v : :: '- :' '' /" <50

<100 NR 29.6

: 30.4 31.3

32.3

: .-' 34.933.0

. T:. ::: . 29.4

12.0 4 28.032.0 31.127.7

Rating4 0

NR 3

4 0 0 43

1 044 44

33

3 3 0

3

2

NR

4

0

4 4

3

12

4

33 4 3

Zn (Zinc) 20:0

2.2RV

18.717-1 ; :

<200 ..--;;:

19:1

16.0 20.1

: 19.5 <TGQ

21.1

<20 17:9

20.1:- : : 1.6:5 ;-,'

20:019.9

: : 22:0

13.819.0

: /: <5

.<:50

<50 ::i 20.1v ::

.-.: 20.r> ' 19.2.',.

17.0. 18.3

20.524.0

. 40.7 ;

22.0 14:6

.:: 20,0

1.9.3

19.4 . 18.0 .

24.0; 44.020.0 16.3 20.2

20.0

Rating3

NR

1 4

3::.. A"-"-

NR.4

NR

. 4

"A ..

o

0

NR :

.. 3

3,; -: 1 .

2 3

410

3 04 ,.;

: 4 .3

04

: ; 14

4

19

Page 23: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 5. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents) Contirued

(MPV.most probable value; ng/L, micrograms per liter mg/L, milligrams per liter Lab, laboratory number OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =Lab133 134 138 140 141142 144 145 146 151155 158 180 183 190191 193 196 203 204212 213 215 217 218219 220 221 224 234235 236 240 241 244246 249 253 255 256257 259 261 265 268270 271 272 273 274

Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Se (Selenium) :9:63 |ug/L

1.64 . .;.;.

RV8.20

10.65 9.5»

10.3010.50 9.30:

10.80

31:5011:40 7:00

10J80

12,00

9.10 .9.77

6.10 9.56

174.10 15.00 : :

. .R44. ;.;.;

5.33

: 8.60

11.85

Rating :-.3

3 4

43 4

NR

NR:

02 13

: 2

4 4

2

: 0 ;'

0

0

: : 3

2

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51 -1.00 1.01 -1.50

SiO2 (Silica) 23.4 mg/L

1.7

RV

22.9 21.5 22.8

26.7

26.0

24.6

23.523.3

23.7 23.424.3

45.9 20.7

23.0

22.525.9 14.3 21.0 24.7

5.8

20.6

21.2

31.3

Rating

4 2 4

1

1

3

44

443

0 1

4

42 0 2 3

0

1

2

0

Rating 1 (Questionable) 0 (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51-2.00 greater than 2.00

Sr (Strontium) Tl (Thallium) : 306 ugll 10.0 ng/L

; is 1.0RV Rating RV Rating

295 297

315

333

316

613305

312

330

295318310

310311 297 294

300

336

3 10.2 4 3 9.4 3

< 50 NR3 10.4 4

1 <10 NR

3 10.3 4

<32.1 NR

04 9.9 4

7.0 0 4 10.1 4

1 10.0 4 9.0 3 <7 0

3 10.9 3 34

4 7.6 04 5.0 0 3

3 9.0 3 10.5 4

4 8.9 2

1

U (Uranium) V (Vanadium) 12.0 : :. -ng/L 30.0 jig/L 0.9 3.0

RV Rating RV

29.7 29.5

30.8122 4 29.6

37.3 30.0

30.6 30.7

32.2

11.5 3 29.9

14.0 0 32.0

13.0 2 28.6

28.0

34.5 27.636.0 31.1

.;-..; 34.7

;:: "-' :: :-": 29.7

93.0

11.0 2 30.0

Rating

4 4

44

04

4 4

3

4

3

4

3

1 314

1

4

0

4

Zn (Zinc) 20.0 2.2RV

20.5 20.4 17.3 : : 20.0: 19.715.7

25.1 <20 20.2

18.6

21.3:: 18.8

<50 ; 19.8

18.0.22.0 29.3 20.0 17.9

17.0 20.0

:34.8 19.0

: 15.419.5 ;- 15.5 23;0 .;. 16.0

184.0 50:0 18.8 ; 20.421.050.0 :::::

22.0

:15.Q 5.8

HC/L

Rating. -,.v4 ' "4 '

.2-:

. -4 ' ":'-

1

: 0 NR4

3

NR

.'3''.

: 3 . o .:.

4 .

2

v.'-O

.4 04 1

: ^

4 .

0 0

20

Page 24: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 6. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)

(MPV.most probable value; |ig/L, micrograms per liter mg/L, milligrams per liter Lab, laboratory number, OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =

Absolute Z-value Rating 0.00 - 0.50 1 (Questionable) 0.51-1.00 O(Poor) 1.01-1.50 NR (Not Rated)

Ag (Silver) 7.55 jig/L 0.92

Al (Aluminium) 67.6 ng/L 11.0

As

Absolute Z-value 1.51 -2.00 greater than 2. 00

(Arsenic) 9.88 pg/L 1.04

B (Boron) .Ba (Barium) 45.6 ng/L 37,1 ng/L

5.8 1.9

Be (Beryllium) 9.04 ng/L 0.70

Ca (Calcium) 30.7: mg/L1,3- :.

Lab OLR V/28 RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating . : RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating134 57

10 11 13 15 1618 19 23 242526 28 30 32 3334 35 36 40 4243 46 4851 5859 68 6970 7375 76 80 81 8385 86 87 89 9196 97

102 104 105107 109 113 114 118119 121 128 129 132

3.4 1.5 3.2 3.4 2.52.8 2.9 2.8 1.6 2.73.6 3.3 2.4 2.8 2.23.5 1.5 2.9 3.62.43.7 3.0 0.8 2.1 2.03.4 3.1 2.8 2.7 1.03.5 1.9 2.93.3 2.53.6 2.8 2.6 2.3 3.62.8 3.2 1.3 2.9 3.52.9 3.1 1.8 3.0 3.43.1 2.5 3.21.7 2.72.83.1 2.8 1.7 2.1

28 25 17 23198

26 22 20 27206 14 14 112416 21 26 103 1

20 16 267

21 21 38

21 2418161119 9 7

22 1613 21 18 21 213 24 23

1 2511 11 217 102614 25 9 16

7.55 6.00 8.00. 6.55 9.90

-.8.00 : 8.13

7.608.40

7.76

7,60 7.40

15.00

7.50

7.10 7.60

9.007-60

10.10 6.97':"

<10;

6.12

8.20

13.00 7:60

8.20 :-:

6.64:, 52.00 :

6.78. 7.40

6.80. .<to6.90

. 6.90

7,50

.4

.. 4

2 0

: 4 3 .

:NR43

4

4

4, ,-v4

0

4

4 '

4

14o3 :

NR

. 1

3

0 4

33..:"

0

34

3 NR 33

4

60.1 98.0 68.0 74.2 83.8

60.0 79.8 82.1 59.1

<100

<50

65.8 37.5

69.1 100.0

300.0 58.8 67.0

86.8 49.2

117.074.4 98.5 50.0

<100 62.067.2 66.7

51.0 57.0

<100

64.6

72.7 69.0

66.065.0

68.1

<200062.0

71.0

73.0

3 0 4 3 2

3 2 2 3

NR

NR

4 0

40

0 3 4

11

03 01

NR 34 4

1 3

NR

4

4 4

44

4

NR3

4

4

9.90 10.00 13.00 9.86

<12010.00 10.00 10.50 <100 10.40

9.20

12.80

9.62

9.00 9.77

9.60

8.00

11.00

9.10 9.80

12.0010.00 6.90

10.20 .

13.009.44

10.60 10.60 10:00

9.95 9.40 9.00

9.70 10.40 6.10

10.30

: 8.50 11.50

10.609.00

9.95

4 4 0 :': 4

NR 4

4 3

NR 43

0

4

3 4

4

1

2

3. 4

14 0 4

NR 04 3 34

4 4 3

4 :4 0

4

21

33

4

45.7 40.0

49.2

50.0

<50 77.0<50

36.9

37.6 45.5

47.0

22.4<100

125.0

<50

42.4 45.7

42.0

40.9 125.0 28.0

4 3

3

3

NR 0

NR

2

24

4

0 NR

0

NR

3 4

3

30 0

36.8 36.5 37.0

.36.0 38.5

36.0 39.S . ;

34.2 38.036.2

34:8 38.337:6

38.6 : 36.0

: 35.441.0

<0.05 :: 35.3

. : :- 37.6 43.2

37.0 38.B

<50

37-2

35.0 : 35,537.7

. 36.8: : 40.0

>.50

<100 29.2 42:0

34.839.0

37.0

. 39.0 . 36.0 31.9

:- .-'4

;.-4

. - 3"

3 2

. -.. ..1 --J4 .

4

. ' 34 3. 3 3

: 0

0 3

40

4 3'"

NR

4

4

1. ": NR

NR::o : 0

22

4- :

2 30

8.94 9.20

8.84 8.70

9.00 9.17 8.70 8.409.20

8.109.17

7.60 9.65

11.00 2.30

13.00

8.96 10.00

9.80 9.30 7.949.17

9.10 10.20

8.00 8.809.64 8.79

8.20

10.00 9.43 8.80

10.00

10.10

8.92 10.00 8.40

44

4 4

4 4 4 34

24

0 3

0 0 0

4 2

2414

4 1

243 4

2

23 4

2

1 NR

4 23

29.0' :3 1.1: :-:':'

28.r3t:f :

'"'. 31 <7 : : ' : 33.2V::. ,.

28.e. : ['.. .30:1 . :::

3i;c : 12.4

31.1so.e31 :£ :'

:32:C .- : : 31.f'30.:2 :" : ':

30.C

' 12.1 . . '3t.C 32.C : :31.6

30.C

30,2 :'31:6;':

.;.. 30:C- : : :

30.1 30.C31 .0 : .

.31:8: ,; ,'29:2.':. : 29:s '.;.;

29.1 33:0

30.330.9 28.7 33.224.0 . .

31.7 . 30.C32.C .

. .34.C . 30.8

413'v .

::::;4-;. 4y.

4Q :: :

;::;.;. 3 '.. 44 .::

: 3 : : ".: 2

.3

: 3 ' :

,. 2 '. '

3

: :.:3 :;:;

..-.V.-3.-V

4 ..

: :: 4 : : :-:-.: : 3.;> . ;.v_ 2 -;: -

2.:.-. . 1-

41 1

. 0

3 3 2

21

Page 25: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 6. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-Continued

(MPV.most probable value; (ig/L, micrograms per liter, mg/L, milligrams per liter, Lab, laboratory number, OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/23, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV. reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51 -1.00 1.01-1.50

Rating 1 (Questionable) 0 (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51 -2.00 greater than 2.00

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =Lab133 134 138 140 141142 144 145 146 149151 155 158 180 183190 191 193 196 203204 212 213 215 217218 219 220 221 224234 235 236 240 241244 245 249 253 255257 259 261 265 268270 271 272 273 274

OLR2.5 3.7 3.3 1.9 2.42.9 2.8 1.2 2.5 3.03.5 1.0 1.9 3.6 0.02.6 3.4 1.9 3.3 2.32.2 2.3 2.9 2.0 2.72.6 2.8 3.3 3.31.83.1 1.8 2.2 1.2 1.60.0 2.3 1.8 0.8 3.50.7 1.5 0.8 3.5 2.70.7 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.1

V/2814 27 26 13 1928 4

23 161119 1

17 18118 25 12 21913 28 12 24 275 19 10 18 1927 22 25 18 23

1 10 12 4 2319 13 4 28 33 4 4 18 11

Ag {Silver) . 7.55 |ig/L 0.92 :RV

6.10 6.89 7.07 ;

121306.60

..:<10 :: 7.60

: 7:64 ,.

6.30

8.78

6.00 7.71X

. 6J80 ' 7.45 ..:

10.00 6.83 ;

7,36

7.34 '.': 7.00

4:70

6.90

5.82 .5.26

7.9313.00

; 10.50

:.. 7 -65 :

18.00

Rating1

. : 3 '

3

02

NR4

:4

. : 2

2

14

3.4

: : o;: : '-: 3

4

4 3 0

3

. : : :-: - 1. 0

40 0

4

0

Al (Aluminium) As (Arsenic) B (Boron) 67.6 ^L 9.88 fig/L 45.6 11.0 1.04 : ..:: 5.8

RV

71.7 64.6

<100

66.3

107.2 <200

60.064.1

71.5 <40.6

61.7 68.0

67.2 60.979.4 74.0

127.0 81.9

68.0

68.5 54.967.0 52.0 71.2

115.0 54.4

77.8

58.150.0

66.9

157.0

Rating

4 4

NR4

0 NR 34

4 NR

34

4 32 3

0 2

4

4 24 2 4 0 2

3

31

4

0

RV7.30 9.07 9.51

8.659.61 9.60

1&.30 13.50

9.29

11.20 11.20 8.00 9.85

11.409:eo8.60

11.00 9.14

9.50 9.31 8.10

10.90

42.70

7.40

11.00

10.00

11.00

Rating0 3 4

24 4 00

3

2 2 14

2.4'-

2 2 3

4 313

0

0

2

4

2

RV

47.1 41.8

38.746.6

44.7

47.8 48.8

44.0

52.0

121.0 45.9

47.0

44.1 40.0 37.4 34.0

46.8

44.0

150.0

Ba (Barium) jig/L 37.1 jig/L

1.9Rating

4 3

24

4

43

4

2

0 4

4

4 3 21

4

4

0

RV36.4 35.6 36.4

38.237.2

40.8 38:5 40.037:8

38.3 36.2

38.0

36.3

39.442.0

39.0 37.1

34.0

33:2:38.3 40JJ 36.3 31.0

"44^5--: :

36.8

35:0

38.0

Rating4 3

. 4-,:

34

1 3 14

3 4

. .4. .

..' 4

.. 2 ' .0

2 4

1

;::;- o -. '

3 1

'- ' 4 .: '

.0 .'. 0

4

2

4 : ' : :- :

Be (Beryllium) Ca (Calcium) 9.04 ng/L 30.7 mg/L 0.70 1.3

RV9.40 9.13 9.22

9.079.35

<0.01 9.90 8.19

8.97

9.90 8.70

10.00 9.00 8.83

11.00 9.12 8.70 8.60

13.208.94 9.00 8.50

7.20

8.93

8.83

9.15

Rating3 4 4

44 0 2 2

4

24

244 ^

0 4 4 3

04 4 3

0

4

4

4

RV30.4 31.5

:v31>5 -;>: 35:0 32.030:1

32;8 :

29.6

32.6 31.0

30.3 30.6

.,,;.2ft.4X;,.

: :29.1::: : ', 31;,?..

31.9

31.7. 26.931.0: 30.0 31.0 32.4 28:5:31.0: 33.5:

'. : 30,2:;: 28.4

: ': 284

30.2.34.0.:

: 3G/v:- 30.7 29.532:5 32.614.0.

:32* 0.0

Rating4 "'' 3

;: 3 ::: . : b

.-. 2:: : ; :- ' .: :. * .:.

' : :-M y:

3

1 4

..-.. 4 . x : :;' v 4-:.-..;;..;. 2:;;,

:: 2 :.: :3

' 3 :

304

.:. 3. ' 4';,;;

.v.-:' : :: '2:: ': 1

.4. . ::0 ..,. '.' 4.

t: . ;: : -'- ; 4'' : ' :

: ' 4 .O

..--. 3 ...

;.-.;;.. ̂ -y

2 :1

. 0 2 0

22

Page 26: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 6. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ng/L, micrograms per liter mg/L, milligrams per liter Lab, laboratory number, OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Analyte = Cd (Cadmium) MPV = 9.33 »gJL

F-pseudosigma = 0.82Lab RV Rating

1 9.79 3 3 10.10. 3: 4 :;9.50: : : 4 5 ..8.90 : 3 7 13.00 0

10 ,. : : ..- . .. 11 9.00 4 13 9.44 4 15 17.20 0 16 9.10 418 -9.20 4 19 23 9.16 4 24 7.60 0 2526. 10.40 2 28 8.10 1 30 :9.60 . : 4; 32 ;9.18 433 ' : '34 35 36 8.60 3 40 8.50. . 2 42 9.00 443 46 8.84 . 3 48 9.20 4 51 58 37.00 . 059 9.00 4 68 10.00 3 69 10.40 2 70 8.60 . 3 73 9.00 475 8.99 4 76 . 80 <10 NR 81 10.00 .3 83 8.80 385 : 7.6.0 0 86 :9.20 : 4 87 12.00 0 89. : 9.46:' 491 .. :96 . 8.90 3 . 97 9,20 4

102 9.90 3 104 105 9186 3107 109 113 9.71 4 114 <10 NR 118 10.60 1119 9,20 4 121 8.00 1 128 10.10 3 129 132 8.50 2

Absolute Z-value 0.00-0.50 0.51-1.00 1.01-1.50

Co (Cobalt) 10.0 ng/L 0.9RV

10.0 6.0

10.6 10.1 11.4

11.0 7.6

<20 10.49.9

4.8

10.4

10.210.2

7.1 14.0

10.7 <50

11.5

<50

10.8

8.0

10.5

10.0

9.7 11.0

9.6

9.4 10.0 11.0

9.5

Rating4 0 34 1

20

NR44

0

4

4 4

0 0

3 NR

1

NR

3

0

3

4

4 2

4

3 4 2

3

Rating 1 (Questionable) O(Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Cr : (Chromium) 15.3" ng/L

1.4RV

15.5 17.0 15.0 15.5 18.016.0 15.0 16.1 16.1 13.814.3

12.3

15.4

14.3 14.5

10.0 9.5

18.0

16.4 17.4

17.016.0 16.5 14.2 15.2 16.016.1 14.8

16.0 15.2

. 14.7 ' 14.4

17.5

16.2 16.2 16.0

15:4

15.6 .20.0 16.513.0

13.0

15.5

Rating ,4

2 4 4 14. 4 3 3 23

0

4

3 3

0 0 1

3 2

24 33 4 434

44

NR4 31

3 3 4

4

40 31

1

4

Absolute Z-value 1.51 -2.00 greater than 2.00

Cu (Copper) 11.0 ng/L

1.4RV Rating

11.1 4 8.0 0

11.8 3 13.9 110.8 4 12.0 3 11.3 4 11.1 4 11.4 412.3 3

8.0 0 11.5 4

11.7 4 4.6 0

11.0 4 11.3 4

19.0 0 10.0 3 13.0 2

11.3 4 11.3 4

<50 NR10.8 4 15.0 0 10.2 3 11.8 3 11.0 410.2 3

10.7 4 11.0 4 11.8 312.6 2 10.9 4

8.3 1 10.2 3

12.9 2 10.2 3 11.0 4

11.4 410.2 3

12.2 3 <10 NR 10.9 410.0 3 11.0 4

9.3 2 30.0 0 29.0 0

Fe (Iron)101

8 :RV

.... ' 96 .'; 120 : 102 100 104105 90

117 92 77

100 :

< 500 98 83

102

230 183 120

97 140: 95.-

107 : -110 101 30

100100 105 108 102 101

98

99 : 85

100103;: 1.03128 -:126 96

. 112 .102 111

:103. ..- 90

: 97 102 100

104

.91 78; :

129

K (Potassium) ng/L 2.13 mg/L

0.16Rating

: . 3 :

.4 : : : 4

43 ...

: : 1 ' . z

A

NR4 04

... 0; : o

: : 0

0 3

.2 40

4

3A "'

AA

.' .4.;.- 1 4

.4'':

0 32 4

..' .'2..:

2:4 4 4

4 42 ' :

0

RV2.17 4.50

2.12 2.46

2.12 2.08

38.30 1.602.10 2.10 2.09 1.94 2.312.13 2.32

2.102.18

1.60 1.99 2.302.20 2.26 2.132.16

1.70 2.10 2.34 1.96

2.03 2.202.50 2.21 5.15 2.01

2.14 2.00

2.082.28 2.20 2.12 2.00

1.60 2.15 1.99 2.10 2.29

Rating4 0

4 1

4 4 0 04 4 4 2 24 2

4 4

0 3 24 3 4 4

0 4 2 2

3 40 4 0 3

4 3

43 4 4 3

0 4 3 4 3

Li (Lithium) : 27.3 |

2.5RV

25.5 : 33.0

36.0 26.2 27.5

44.3

22.8 .

27.6 29.025.5

24.0 . 27.3

25.3 6.0

2,8 28.7

27.3 ; -27.6-

26.2 .

23.2

.26.6

ig/L

Rating3 0 0

. 4

0:

.43"3'

24 --

>

0 ..

4 :.;., .4..;...

. 4

.1 .

4

23

Page 27: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 6. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-Continue?

(MPV.most probable value; ng/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)

Anatyte = MPV =

F-pseudoskjma =

Rating 4 (Excellent} 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Cd {Cadmium) 9.33 ug/L

: .:P.82

Absolute Z-value 0.00-0.50 0.51-1.00 1.01-1.50

Co (Cobalt) 10.0 ug/L 0.9

Rating 1 (Questionable} 0 (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Cr (Chromium) 15.3 ug/L

1.4

Absolute Z-value 1.51-2.00 greater than 2. 00

Cu (Copper) 11.0 ug/L

1.4

Fe (Iron) 101 ug/L

8

K (Potassium) 2.13 mg/L 0.16

Li (Lithium) 27.3 ug/L

2.5 :Lab RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating133134138140141142144145146149151155158180183190191193196:203204212213215217218219220221224234235236240241244245249253255257259261265268270271272273274

10..609.26"9.089.008.989.82

11.00:9.0310.009.39

: 4.6010.00

10.309.31 :11:009.39

1.1.008.:19to.bo7.10

8.80

9.63 :5.90:9.609.80:7.4012.00.:-9:80'- :

. 9.35.8.00

: 9.8716.00 :

: : .6.00:; :

10.00 :

17.206.90

14

; 4.

44

. 3

1' ' '4-.-.3A

03

2414 :..

12

,0:30

3 -,.; :

404 .30 - :. -0 :: ' 3

41

3. .0

..-..o,...

. 3 ..;

':.' o

0

10.28.6

<109.7

14.69.2

10.69.7

10.8

9.4

10.010.69.09.5

9.3

10.010.110.613.05.65.8

10.519.09.0

9.5

11.0

41

NR4

03

34

3

3

4323

3

443000

302

3

2

15.3 ;14.610.916.012.013,9

19.314.517.014.5

13.114,3

19.1.15.415.013|6

19.812.615.414.012.7

13.0

15.0

16.915.014,7

14.4

13.017.620.1.14.630.014.0

16.0

17.0

440403

0323

13

0442

0 .0431

1

4

244

3

110303

4

2

8.911.09.8

14.012.710.110.319.313.7

11.8

13.810.6

11.011.0<2511.27.75.4

14.011.215.011.0

9.4

10.613.212.48.58.8

12.014.9

11.210.410.010.313.011.0

11.8

5.02.6

143023301

3

14

44NR4000404

2

4131130

443424

3

00

10410010410785

106

1029910090.11310999

8898

9693110105106106

92.9811795 .

1021109883

121

411809981

: ;.. 97

96147

444313

' :' -4':::;-442124"

14

322333

241 :

342400

004o: .

3

3 '

0

2.132.102.252.171.86

2.222.61

2.00

2.132.112.04

2.532.122.00

2.201.842.072.202.202.221.952.123.502.13

2.06

2.36

2.082.602.301.762.092.552.662.802.002.982.68

44341

30

3

443

043

4144432404

4

2

40204000300

27.7

.28.0

31.3

25.5

3t.1

26.6

29:0

26.3

25.0

30.4

20.6

28.021.0

27,4

46.0

4- -,-;.

.4

1

3

. : :--l-.::

4

3

4 .

;. : . 3 ...

2 .

0

. .-. 4 :

o.

- ..4 '

0

24

Page 28: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 6. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents) Continued

(MPV.most probable value; |ig/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51-1.00 1.01 -1.50

Rating 1 (Questionable) 0 (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51 -2.00 greater than 2.00

Analyte = Mg (Magnesium) Mn (Manganese) Mo (Molybdenum) Na (Sodium) Mr (Nickel) : Pb (Lead) Sb (Antimony) MPV= 8.68 mg/L 20.9 ng/L 9.23 M9/L 41.2 mg/L 11;0 ng/L . 12.7 ng/L 8:80 ng/L

pseudosigma = 0.45. 1.5 1-29 1.9 1.3 1.2 0.96 ;: ;Lab

1 3 4 5 7

10 11 13 . 15 1618 19 23 24 2526 28 30 32 3334 35 36 40 4243 46 48 51 5859 68 69 70 7375 7680: 81 8385 86 87 89 9196 97

102 104 105107 109 113 114 118119 121 128 129 132

RV8.17 8.52:

8.70; 8. tO 9.06

^9.20 9.07 8.10 8.60.8.60 :

8.80 8.72 8.44 8.409.10 8.90 9.00 9.11 8.95

7.60 8.48 9.308.80 8.67 8.89

16.47

8.50 9.05 8.37 8.73

8:90

8.58 8.45:8.92 8.67 :

8.36 8.29

8.55 10.30

8.688.91 8.50 8.84 8.00

9.10 8.30 8.28 9.00 8.79

Rating24: 4'

2 3 ' -'

2 ' . .3

2 44 4 4 3 33 4 33

: 3

0 4 24 4 4 0

4 3 3 4

4

4 43 4 3 .

: 3.

. 4 0

43 4 4 1

3 3 3 3

. 4

RV20.3 17.0 21.0 21.0 21.425.0 21.0 19.5 24.0 21.5

20.3

21.8 19.8 21.021.5 23.3 21.0 20.9 20.0

22.0 18.1 23.020.0 20.4 20.0

<5021.0 21.5 <20 20.6 21.020.8

18.5 20.0 20.3

20.3 27.0 20.4 20.327.0 24.2 23.0

19.620.0 19.3 21.5 21.0

21.0 22.0 18.7 10.0 19.0

Rating4 0 4 4 40 4 3 0 44

3 3 44 1 4 4 3

3 1 23 4 3

NR4 4

NR4 44

1 3 4

4 0 4 40 0 2

33 2 4 4

4 3 2 0 2

RV8.67 6.00

<10 <15-

10.00

20.10 8.90<20

<100

9.90 6,40 9.40 . 8.18

9.90 10.00

9.30

7.30

<50

<10

17.70 11.00

9.58

9.38

8.20

8.33

5.50

12.00

Rating. 4

0

NR NR

3

. 0. 4

NR

NR

30 4 3

33

4

2

NR

NR

0 2

4

4

3

3

0

0

RV40.2 43.6

41.4 43.3

40.7 43.7 38.3 40.240.0 41.9 38.6 40.5 46.042.8 53.1

40.5 42.2

38.0 40.0 41.043.0 42.642.7 41.0

40.0 43.041.2 41.8

42.5

40.0 40.442.1 42.8 39.6 40.1

41.8 37.0

42.240.2 41.2 35.5 34.0

43.1 39.0 40.4 42.0 42.4

Rating3 2

4 2

4 2 1 33 4 2 4 03 0

4 3

1 3 43 3 34

3 3 4 4

3

3 44 3 3 3

4 0

334 00

2 24 4 3

RV10.9 7.8

i.10.0 <10

:<20

.10.0 10.5 13.0 13.4<25

11.8 :

10.8 17.3 11.5. 11.0

9:0 ;;:

13.0

; 11.4

70.011.48:5 9:6

<.50 10.0<2011:7 ;

7.0 10.5<10

9.0 15.3

:::: li.3.y::

10.5. 10.5 11.0

10.8

11.5<1Q 13.4 .14.3

11.0

14.0

Rating4 0 3

NR NR

" : :. 3

:-. : : 4 .. 2.

:':: :T \NR

' 3

4:o4

' A

'-' 2 .y.

: ':" 2

:"4' : "

04 1 2

:NR :3

NR>.': ; 3 ;

. o : '.; ;: 4 ::-

NR1

: o: :.-. . 4

44 4

4

4 NR

- ; 1::0

4

0

RV12.6 6.0

13.0 13.5 <55

12.7 13.0 13.5 15.2 13.412.7 13.2 11.1

10.8 9.5

11.5 12.6

13.4

15.0

6.0

13.7 13.0

42.012.4 16.6 12.0 12.8 16.012.5 12.1 11.7 13.012.4<50

13.4 11.2 12.1

13.1 12.7 15.0

13.8

10.0 12.2 <10

12.511.5

12.9

22.5

Rating4 0 : 4 3 :

NR4 4 . 3 1 34 4 2

1 0 2 4

3

1

0

3 4

04 03 : 4 : 04 3 344

NR 3 2 3

44 1

3

0 4

NR42

4

0

RV8.65

12:00

<20<30

: 9.70 . 7.80:

9.25 8.807.20 ;

<20

9:20 8.43

6.00 .

10.00

9.30 7.60

9.30 7.85 8.15

'11.40

<50

<6

8.30

8.20 :--: 9.06.

<r_

9.03

8.10

9.15

Rating -.: :: 4

:: 0

NR NR

v ;-::': : 3-.-: :: : : 2''

44

. 1

NR

4 .. : .-4

0

2

3 2

. 3: . 3- .

.' -:3'

0

NR

o -

3

. .3 : 4

0

4

3

4 : '' :

25

Page 29: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 6. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample 7-745 (trace constituents)-Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ng/L, micrograms per liter mg/L, milligrams per liter Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value 0.00-0.50 0.51-1.00 1.01 -1.50

Rating 1 (Questionable) 0 (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51-2.00 greater than 2.00

Analyte = Mg (Magnesium) Mn (Manganese) Mb (Molybdenum) Na (Sodium) Ni (Nickel) MPV= 8.68 mg/L 20.9 ng/L 9.23 ng/L 41.2 mg/L 11.0 jig/L

F-pseudosigma = 0.45 1.5 1.29 1.9 1.3Lab133 134 138 140141142 144 145 146 149151 155 158 180 183190 191 193 196 . 203204 212 213 215 217218 219 220 221 224234 235 236 240 241244 245 249 253 255257 259 261 265 268270 271 272 273 274

RV8.39 8i57 8:88

: .9.50 9.138:18

9.28 8.20

9.50 8.85

8.63 8.99 8.20

8.54

9.40

::&.90 8.098.45, &.60 9.00

>.35 :

8.26 :8.51 9.60

. 9.00.8:50

:-' 7.40 :

:8.627.40

10.80 : 8.70

8.65

25.15: 6.06 : 9.60 0.00

Rating34 .

4: :--:y1

2: 2

''" 2 '- ' 2-/.

1 4

4 3 2

4

. 1

4 24

. : : . 4: 3

: :-.:;. 3.;-:

... 3 : .

4. ,: : ,:a ::

3 . 4

0

4- '

0

0 : :: : ; ; 4

4

: 0. o ....

6 0

RV

21.1 20.5 19.0 20.922.0

23.3 20.6 22.019.5

227 20.5 25.222.4 22.0

19.1 20.016.0 22.0

19.7 19.8

20.4 22.422.020.9 20.0 20.5 19.0 23.030.7 25.0

20.817.0

22.6

25.1 8.0

Rating

4 4 243

1 4 33

24 023

2 30 3

3 3

4 234 3 4 2 20 0

40

2

00

RV

8.68 8.39

<10

9.31

7.60 : .< 10

10.009.10

10.50

9.30

8.54

8.40

8.40 7.20

5.00

8.19 13.0010.70

8.00 <11

11.40

12.20

9.2372.00

9.00

Rating

4 3

NR4

2 NR34

3

4

3

3

3 1

0

3 02 3

NR

1

0

40

4

RV

41.2 41.6 48.5 43.041.8

44.2 42.4

417

41.4 40.1 39.2

39.439.4 44.4

42.4 40.938.0 40.0 38.0 41.2 36.139.2 48.0 40.3

37.0

42.1

40.240.0 42.0 45.9 40.6 41.049.4 40.0 50.0 44.9 22.4

Rating

4 4 034

1 3

4

4 3 2

33 1

3 41 3 1 4 02 0 4

0

4

33 4 0 4 40 3 0 1 0

RV9.9

10.5 9.4

10.0 <20

11-0

16:4 < 40 : 10.011.6

12.5 11.1

11.2 11.9 <50

10.6

14.0 10.3 12,0

9.7

10.2 10.913.3 12.0 10.2 23.0 10.5

10.7 8.7

11.714.0 16-0' ;

10.0

12.0

Rating3 4 2 3

NR.; 4

0 NR 34

2 4

: 43

NR4 .

: :. Q .- 3'- ,.

3

3

.. : 3 . 4

1 3 3 . 0 4

41

30

. 0

3

3

Pb (Lead) 127 jig/L

1.2RV

21.7 12.6 12.0 10.0 13.612.7

115.0 15.4 12.012.8

6.6 <27.2

11.1 12.8 14.0 12.6

12.318.0 13.6 13.5 12.5

12.1 12.8 11.014.4

5.6 27.0 16.4

14.6 13.7

13.149.0 10.0

12.4

7.0 1.3

Rating0 ' 4 3 0 34

0 0 34

0 NR

2 4 2 4

4 0 3 3 4

3 4 22

0 0 0

13

40 0

4

00

Sb (Antimony) 8.80 ng/L 0.96

RV

8.58 8.80

5.1311.30

<20

9.04

<31.4

< :10 8.21

8.60

14.00 8.69

; 10.50

26.10 14.00 . 8.30

11:932.00

9.00

Rating

4 4

0. .0. -:: .

NR

4

NR

NRi: 3

4 '

: o -4

1

0: 0.

3

0' '

0:

4

26

Page 30: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 6. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ng/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR. overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

1 3 4 57

10 11 13 15 1618 19 23 242526 28 30 32 3334 35 36 40 4243 46 48 51 5859 68 69 70 7375 76 80 81 8385 86 87 899196 97

102 104 105107 109 113 114 118119 121 128 129 132

Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Se (Selenium) 10.1 MS/L 1.3

RV. 10.0

< 10

to.o<-50

9.0 : . 1:2.6

8.2 12.1 10.010.1

9.3

8.8

10.3

10.2

8.0

13.0

9.5 .8.6

11,0 6.9

10.2... 11.0. . : : 33.0

9.3

11:6

t9.2

10.0 8.8

13.0 .

11.3

9.5

9.610.0

11.2

Rating4

NR

:. 4 NR3 1 21 44

3

.3-

: 3 4

4

1

. 0

4 2

3 0 4 304

3 ; '

20

43 0

3

4

44

3

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51 -1.00 1.01 -1.50

SiO2 (Silica) 11.3 mg/L 0.7

RV10.6 5.7

11.4 11.1 11.6

8.911.2 12.3

11.6 12.711.5

11.4 10.9

12.111.0

10.9

12.2

11.5 10.4

11.8 10.7

11.3

10.7 10.911.9

11.0

11.412.0 11.3 11.8 11.5

Rating20 4 4 4

0 4 2

4 14

4 3

24

3

' 2

4 2

3 3

4

3 33

4

42 4 34

Rating Absolute Z-value 1 (Questionable) 1.51-2.00 0 (Poor) greater than 2.00 NR (Mot Rated)

Sr (Strontium) Tl (Thallium) 203 ng/L 15.3 ug/L

9 2.7RV Rating RV Rating

198 3 16.7 3 207 4 < 10 NR 205 4 205 4 203 4

202 4 20.0 1 . 15.8 4

11.6 2 184 0 16.0 4200 4 13.8 3

<5 0 204 4 215 2

207 4

203 4 15.6 4 200 4

8.0 0 169 0 201 4 g.o 0

16.2 4 12.1 2

200 4 15.5 4 210 3

16.4 4 206 4 13.3 3

11.2 1

175 0 84.0 0

214 2 196 3

<10 NR

169 0 16.7 3 239 : 0 19.0 2

194 2

183 0 203 4 13.1 3

15.9 4 195 3

15.3 4

U (Uranium) V (Vanadium) 1.10 ng/L 11-7 ng/L 0.04 1.7

RV Rating RV1.06 2 12.0

6.0

12.4 <120 NR 12.6

11.0 <50

1.20 0 15.011.2

12.5 14.6

120 0 11.4 11.8

10.4 15.0

- 10.4 9.5

: 9.9

<50

< 100 NR 11.5

.: . 9.0

<20 13.1

14.2

: 14.0 ; .;:" 10.0

. . 11.1

1.07 3 10.3

10.2

Rating4 0

4 3

4 NR NR

14

4 1 44

31

32

2

NR

4

1

NR 3

2

2 3

4

3

3

Zn (Zinc) 10.0 2.4

RV11.4 7.0

14.0 :9.7 . ',:

11.016.0 ;

9.9: : : < 5

9.4<100

<2010.2

9.2 6,0

:' '9.6 : : 10.0

. .16:0

10.0

<5

<50 :10.0 10.5 : <50 <20

13.0: : 11.0

.. 8.0

. 9.8

11.816.3 : :13.8

. 11.0: <4.6

: :8.8.

9.0

8.5

15;0. . 10.0

12.0 \ 10.1

9.0

Mil

Rating32

: : -4

0

: :: 0 :: :4.

NR

NR" 4 ''

'. 4'..

. "T-: .4

"4. ..

0

4

NR

4 4

NR

' '' ' 2.

34 '

0

.1 . :

4 .

NR: -3. .

' : 4

3 NR

: 043 4

4

27

Page 31: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 6. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ng/L, micrograms per liter rng/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/28, number of reported values of 28 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =

Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Se (Setenium) 10.1 fig/L 1.3

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51-1.00 1.01 -1.50

SiO2 (Silica) 11.3 mg/L 0.7

Rating 1 (Questionable) O(Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Sr {Strontium) 203 jig/I

9

Absolute Z-value 1.51-2.00 greater than 2.00

Tl (Thallium) 15.3 jig/L 2.7

U (Uranium) 1.10 ng/t 0.04

V (Vanadium) 11.7 ng/L

1.7

Zn (Zinc) 10:0 ng/L 2.4

Lab RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating133134138140141142144145146149151155158180183190191193196203204212213215217218219220221224234235236240241244245249253255257259261265268270271272273274

10.8:10.79.6

9.310.8 KM)

<1010.01t.2

<50.1

11.0 :12.08.0

11.1

11.0

5.0ia.2

8.69.7

10.59,6 : : : ; ,

128.3 :18.07.0

. ; - ::-8;i,-,: '

8.7

12.4

344

334

NR4

: 3 .;.

NR

3213

3

0 ;-.. 4

' ' .'2--''-'

4 , :44

:.::-0 _Q:0 .

: 2 : - :-:

2 v/

1

11.210.811.2

12.8

12.5

12.4

11.911.1

10.811.411.8

11.39.9

10.8

11.012.67.0

10.511.8

10.1

227.019.2

434

0

1

1

34

343

41

3

41023

1

00

195198

212

216

208

390203

194

210

193229210

206208199197

200

-33

2

1

3

04

2

3

203

4343

4

16.915.0

<5016.7

14.0

16.0

<32.1

15.89.0

15.3

16.012.4<7

15.2

10.97.9

10.015.9

15.0

34

NR3 0:86

4

4

NR

404 1.12

4 1.10204 1.10

10

14

4 1.10

10.711.0

12.70 10.7

17.011.5

12.512.0

12.0

3 10.2

4 12.0

4 8.9

10.0

18.811.015.012.1

13.0

11.639.0

. 4 12.0

34

33

04

44

4

3

4

1

3

0414

3

40

4

10.111.7

. :8:014.09.98.4

13.0<20

8.9

7.29.5

13.38.5 -<5014.5

7.212.014.00.07.9

11.010.0:11.3 :10.2 :6.7 .8.38.6

1-LO

5.0

9.30.6

20.09,7

: 9.0 ;66-0 :

10.5

: 20.05.8

4: 3 " '3 :

143

2NF

4.. .

.2-x:-' "4"'...

23NF

: 1

23:103

4. . ,4.-.

'3 .4 ' ' "

:.. 23

.,-:: : ' ::3' ..: 4v.0 " '

40. : :() :-:

. : : 4,,4

i'X^O-:-;

:;: 4 . :

01

28

Page 32: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 7. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)

(MPV.most probable value; mg/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; |iS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/16, number of reported values of 16 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)

Lab1 2 3 4 57

101113 1516 18 19 22 232425 26 28 3032 33 36 383940 42 43 46 4850 51 5556 5759 64 68 697075 76 80 818385 86 87 89 9092 96 97

102 105107 109 113 114 118119 121 127 128 129

Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Anatyte* MPV =

F-pseudosigma =OLR V/16

3.5 16 1.5 10 1.9 16 4.0 2 3.4 132.2 6 3.5 13 1.7 12 2.7 12 1.8 122.5 15 2.9 14 3.0 10 4.0 1 2.7 143.7 13 2.5 12 3.4 13 2.3 7 3.2 52.9 14 3.4 11 1.8 11 3.3 102.6 72.9 13 1.8 12 3.7 11 2.6 12 2.2 123.2 13 2.8 8 2.6 122.3 9 2.2 132.3 12 3.4 7 2.5 13 2.6 10 3.5 133.7 10 2.6 5 1.8 12 3.4 143.0 93.1 12 3.3 9 1.8 12 3.0 13 1.0 43.8 6 3.3 7 2.7 141.5 10 2.9 143.5 11 2.8 11 2.9 14 3.6 8 2.7 63.2 14 4.0 6 3.4 14 3.3 12 2.6 14

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51 -1.00 1.01 -1.50

Alkalinity 114 mg/L

3RV

;:. 115 106 116

1.13 :". 147 " l "

x:-x; : il6-. ;:-.: : 116 ;: : : : : 10$::

96113 108

' y : .115 'x;:y.: x;

: :x-';:x-i-H '

115 116 . 114

116 113 115

:.- 116 100113

: 140. . .115 ....- - : :iVi---- :

: 112 : :.-. t18 x.Xxx: - :;ii6::x;: '- : :'

:- . 108 ..,..119

120 Xy.-.ii7.;,,

116: 118

115114

- ,: ..'. 108., : : >.

.112'..W-.115 '

: : 113 ...- x m

120. .114 : ; :1Q3

1t3 : 115 '

: 117

111114 122 115 115 115110

116116 118

Rating :x-: -4 : :

o... .._ 3 -

A.'..3

x-x3. ; 3 x Q : '

:xO:3

xo : . A :

243 4

3 3 4 4 04 0

':4 :-. - 4 _.;..

; ;: : 3 . .

. 2.' 3 ' "

0. 2

13

: X3 -:: 2 4

A 034. : :

::3 -2

1A ..: 044

: .-3

24 0 4 442

3 ' '

.3v, 2.

Rating 1 (Questionable) O (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

B (Boron) 41.6^9/L

5.2RV

43.6

'. 43.0

44.5

60.0

<50

61.6 <50

38.2

35.3 35.0

21.0

21.5 20.051.0

<100

145.0

<50

40.9

40.6 44.1

43.0

39.4 33.1 55.0

Rating4

4

3

0

NR0

NR

3

2 2

0

001

NR

0

NR4

4 4

4

4 1 0

Absolute Z-value 1.51-2.00 greater than 2. 00

Ca (Calcium) 60.7 mg/L

3.1RV

56,3

67:5

59,8

59,2 23

65;4 53.258,6 60.1 60.3

65.359.8. . 64.4 61.1 61.563.061.3 59.2 56.0 58.1

53.6 63.3 6t.O 58.S

. . 62.2 :::.-- 63.0 .

59.2: ; ,61.8 63.068-0

. 63.0 58.8 61.458,2

66.0 59.958.462.1. 62.6 56.0 58.3 58.4

57.960.4 61058.0 58.7 66.0

61.1 60.0 ;

62.0 62.0

Ratingv x2 :: : : :

:.-oO-:-

4 ' '"

-.A:-.::-.. . ..Q.'.V-V.

ixxx 03

.X-4: "

4 :-X'

24

::2 :

4 4 344 ;

23.x::

03 ::.,: 4... g ......

4 : ' :. 3

4.4

. ' 3;-::o

' - 3 xxx. x3 '

43 .

xxl ' ,':4": .

: 3' ' :

43 ' ::

2 3 3 .

: . 3

4 :x 4 .3 31.

44'x;

4.4

Cl (Chloride) 25.8 mg/L

1.4RV

24.7 27.7 26.7 26.0 24.824.1 26.3 26.7 24.8 26.428.9 27.0 25.0

26.225.6 24.6 26.2

25.226.9 24.3 26.0

30.026.9 35.8 26.0 26.6 24.025.0 27.8 25.823.525.024.0 26.3 26.5 26.2 25.826.1 27.9 25.0 23525-2

25.0

29.0 25.0

24.9 25.7£%J.9

25.227.2 23.3 24.9 25,0

24.7

: 26.4 25.4 25.0

Rating3 2 3 4 32 4 3 3 40 3 3

44 3 4

43 2 4

03 0 4 3 23 241 32 4 4 4 44 2 3 243

0 3

3 44 43 1 3 3

3

4 4 3

DSHD 382 mg/t

: " 16' v ' '

RV370

::x 370 : ;

xx:: .386 . :.-:

'T:386 : - .' ' ' x-x:x358.-X;..x-:-

: : : '.-. . 38*. :-: .:: ,. . 367: :.. .372: XY.^ -..;

. ':.;:; 374 ,.

:::.: :fyj-\- ' '

' ; :;X368::: ; :. : : : ' x ;37«; ::,;:-x

:x. :- ::372- :,. : .;,,

. 410 . : : :x: ::::::3TSXv.

378

38fi . .

382

: :-. .-. .380 -.'.;:.

: : : 390 v/.371

-.-.- ^401 .,: ' : . : 385-" ': :39e :: x' ' 398 .

: x 411- ! xx xx :424; :: : x:

378

. . . .348.-'. .'" :_ -;jjj^:-: :- .

x ::4i6::;-\

.374 . 402

:'. '406 :.-.:.

365 !

387:396 .

: .,375 x

: . : ' :x: :-:3?a : .;v ;X- ::: . .370

: -: : :. x ::'387x-': : :

" '/' '37S.-'

Rating :3.-:-

.:-. ?; .;. : : '4'-; : :

^// -.

1:--:4.. -:;.-. 3'-' :v

3 . XX.3-.^ '.,'.:

' 3"

.3'-: 4x....

, : . : :-3: , : :--::

: 1 : :-4 : ;:.

4

': 4 .'

A ;-.

4 :' !

:: 4: :--'.3 :. ;

2 '.' 4 .

3 ,x. :.3 x : : '1:"'''

: x-0' ::;:::

4

0 : ':" :- .3:-'

x: ' : :"1 : : ; ' :X." 4.V. .V: 2

1 :x:

2.-

4 . ! .3- 4- : : :

: : 3 :x3 .-.-.

: 4.,..;,

:-4 : '

29

Page 33: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 7. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents) Continued

(MPV.most probable value; mg/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; |iS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/16, number of reported values of 16 possible values; RV. reported value; <, less than)

Lab132 133 134 138 140141 142 143 145 146149 151 155 158 180183 190 191 193 196203 204 212 213 215217 218 219 220 221224 234 235 236 240241 243 244 247 249253 255 256 257 258259 261 262 265 268270 271 272 273 274

Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =OLR V/16

3.1 9 2.8 6 3.3 15 3.8 15 2.5 113.3 12 2.8 16 3.6 5 2.9 15 2.8 113.2 6 3.0 13 3.3 8 3.5 8 2.8 121.7 32.4 14 3.0 11 3.0 3 2.7 32.2 6 3.0 8 2.7 16 3.0 - 4 2.8 141.6 14 1.6 8 2.7 9 3.3 7 3.1 81.6 13 3.5 16 1.1 9 2.9 15 3.0 122.3 14 2.7 3 4.0 3 2.3 6 1.8 92.0 5 3.1 14 1.6 9 2.0 13 1.4 113.1 15 1.0 9 1.9 11 3.3 13 2.0 90.0 3 1.1 8 0.4 9 1.1 12 0.4 12

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51-1.00 1.01-1.50

Alkalinity 114 mg/L

" "" 3

RV. 114 : 115

; 136 .-114

H6

116 : 113

99 114114

:.. 114 : : / : 117 111 111

115 118 114

105 111 112112

: 112

117 . 106

: 112

104::; ..: t12 :::: . : :

: 114: .:-:m

:. ..- li®

115-,.-... -.-.4

107

113 107 115

" ". 124

114 :;.; 120-:- ;-,.

: 108 136 118

310 : 124 229

Rating4 40 4

33 4 044 4 3 2 2

4 -: 2 4

0 2 3

:3.v 3:3 0

3

0: : 3:::-.;-

4 - 3

4

: 4

0 0

4o : .:4 04

,: : :1 :0 0

:-,2':-:

0 0 0

Rating 1 (Questionable) O (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

:B (Boron) 41.6ng/L

5.2RV

42.5

42.3 37.6

37.5 41.0

48.3

44.5

45.0

40.040.6

44.0

39.0 38.0 40.4 58.7

22.4 <20

85.0

22.0 43.0

70.0

Rating^4

4 3

34

2

3

3

44

4

3 34 0

0 NR

0

0 4

0

Absolute Z-value 1.51 -2.00 greater than 2.00

Ca (Calcium) 60.7 mg/L

3.1RV

58.8 59.7 61.1 62.0 62.563.3 59,0

62.8 56.9

61.2 60.7

60.4

58.6 59.1

59.8 62.9

62.050.6 55.7 58.0 60.0 '66.4 ;65.9 60.6 66.5 59.6 59.463.0

65.2

60.6 63.2 68.0 67.059.6

:64,6 63.0 61.0 53.953.1 63.1 27.3 63.0 40.4

Rating34. 4 4 33 3

3 2

44

4

3 4

4 3

40' 1" '

3 4-:-v 11 414 43

2 :. ::

4 3 0 14 -. : 23 4 00 3 0 3 0

Cl (Chloride) 25.8 mg/L

1.4RV

19.6 26.8 25.9 26.825.6 25.2 26.4 24.9 27.027.0 25.0

24.9 24.628.2 28.7 26.1

23.224.1 25.3 26.2 26.9 24.025.9

26.8 25.427.6 24.0

29.0 23.922.0

25.7 30.624.2 26.3 28.2 26.0 32.225.0 23.5 25.7 25.5 25.6

27.0 42.5 27.0 41.3

Rating

0 3 4 34 4 4 3 33 3

3 31 04

12 4 4 3 24

342 2

0 20

4 02 4 14 03 14 4 4

3 0 3 0

DSRD :: 382 mg/L

16RV

397 368 377376 393 398

374

378 397 388

0

354

375381

;' :--396' : '::v -:: -;:

380 382

385 380284

404 : 384

395

384: :

Rating

3/ -3 .:

44 3 3 .

4

4 '

3 4

0

1

4-. - .. 4

:: . 3 ; ::

4 4

4 .:-.- 40

24 : .-.

3

4

0.7 117 63.9

30

Page 34: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 7. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents) Continued

(MPV.most probable value; mg/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter, >iS/cm, mierosiemens per centimeter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/16, number of reported values of 16 possible values; RV, reported vaJue; <, less than)

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

1 2 3 4 57

10 11 13 1516 18 19 22 2324 25 26 28 3032 33 36 38 3940 42 43 46 4850 51 55 56 5759 64 68 69 7075 76 80 81 8385 86 87 89 9092 96 97

102 105107 109 113 114 118119 121 127 128 129

Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value 0.00-0.50 0.51 -1.00 1.01 -1.50

F (Fkioride) K 0.530 mg/L

0.037RV

0.560 0.590 0.599

0.680 0.520

: 0.500 0.5tO 0.5210.544

. 0.510

0.5560.560 0,510. 0.570

0,431

0.467

0.540 >.0.506

0.523 0.6900.530

0.520

0.5200.5SO

0.580 0.580.

0.542 0.510 0,538 0.650

0.084

0.525 0.495

0.5500.527 0.590 0.525 0.530

0.530

0,476 0.520 0.645

Rating31 1

0 4 3 3 44 3

3 '' '

3 3 '

2

0

1

:., 4 -.: :

: 3

4 04

4

' -4

3

22 : :

4 '

34 '.-.

0

0

4 3

34 1 4 . 4

4

2 4

0

Rating Absolute Z-value 1 (Questionable) 1.51-2.00 O (Poor) greater than 2.00 NR (Not Rated)

(Potassium) Mg 2.58 mg/L

0.14RV

2.57 2.10 2.43

2.37

2.58

2.30 2.362.50 2.20 2.60

2.682.45

2.68 2.32

2.53 2.62 2.10 2.62

2.64 2.70 2.60 2.25 2.582.50 2.56

3.02 3.20<5

2.68 2.90 2.82 2.48

2.00 2.53 2.602.95 2.64 2.47 2.38

2.60 2.30 2.612.75 2.56 2.77

2.50 2.56 2.53 2.58 2.50

Rating4 0 2

2

4

1 130 4

33

3 1

44 0 4

4 3 4 0 43 4

0 0

NR 3 0 13 :

04 40 4 3 2

4 1 42 4 2

3 4 4 43

^Magnesium) Na (Sodium) {total Phosphorus) as P 18.0 mg/L 39.0 mg/L 0,032 mg/L

:i.O 1.9 0.011 :RV Rating RV

17.4 3 38.2 17.0 2 35.0 20.6 0 34.5

17.1 3 39.6

18.4 4 38.8 0.5 0 1.5

19.0 2 41.2 15.0 0 34.517,8 4 38.5 18.0 . 4 39.0 18.4 . 4 41.2

18.0 4 34.818.1 4 38.8 19.2 2 42.7 192 2 40.9 18.2 4 42.7 17.0 220.0 0 39.5 17.8 4 38.2 17.0 . 2 35.0 18.1 4 34.4

16.8 2 37.1 19.3. 2 39.2 19.0 : 2 40.0 17.2 3 39.6 183 4 39.818.0 4 40.0 11.0 0 . 38.8 19.4 2 193 . 2 50.8 20,0 0 36.020.5 0 44.5

37.9 18:0 4 40.5 17.5 3 38.6 18.1 4 39.418.4 4 38.4

17.0 2 37.0 18.2 4 39.1 17.2 3 38.118.3 4 39.8 18.1 4 412 17.2 3 37.3 18.2 4 382

18.0 4 40.1 19.9 1 33.2 18.8 3 40.817.7 4 39.6 17.6 4 38.6 195 1 35.9

18.6 3 39.9 17.7 4 38.9 18.6 3 39.0 172 3 ; 38.1 18.0 4 37.0

Rating RV4 6.030 0 0.052 0 0.030

4 . ' :

4 : :::; ,: 0 o!0452 "" '? ;.: "'o : <o.05 :4 .... : 0.051 4 0;0272 . ;.>-: : : : . ;

.0.032 0 ..:" 0.0344 '... .. . '

1 .'.'. , " '.:3 ;: ,: ;: :

1 ..: ::' " . : : :. ;:;

4 0.050 .4 ::-- : -. ''-. / 0 0 0:032 .

0.034:3 ... -., .. 4 .: :; .: ';: -vox 3 .- ' ..-:: .4 . ...... ..': '.'::.4 : :''' 0.0703 . ::; ... 4 ' ... ......'"

0.024: 0 1 0.040 ' 0 OJI40 . 3 0,030 3 . : 0.052 .4 ; : :-: / . :. 4 \ < 0- 14 .;..,.;., -;.;.. ..;. .;.;,

2 : ' : .. .,;::: :4 0:0284 ^ioo: ; :4 ..-.-: :.-...-. . /.- -,2 :.''-. .:...3 : 0:028 : 4 .;; 0,023

0.027

3 <0.002. . 0 0.007 3 0.019 .4 0.028 4 1 0.028

0,031 D.020 :

4 : 0.030 .... 4 4 <0.01 4 :: : 2 0.027

Rating :4.:: . ,-, 1

4 . '

.. ..-2:... ........

NR1 .4 >" :

'.'.. 4 . : : :: 4

1

4 :- ;. -

: .4 :

.0 .

:-3 :-'

v:-3-: '.3 4 1

MR

4 NR

-4

:4

. 40 "

o24

: :4 . 4

2.4 .

NR

4

31

Page 35: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 7. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents) Continued

(MPV.most probable value; mg/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; nS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overr II laboratory rating for all reported values: V/16, number of reported values of 16 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =Lab132 133 134 138 140141 142 143 145 146 us151 155 158 180183 190 191 193 196203 204 212 213 215217 218 219 220 221224 234 235 236 240241 243 244 247 249253 255 256 257 258259 261 262 265 268270 271 272 273 274

Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z -value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51 -1.00 1.01-1.50

F (Fluoride) K :0.530 mg/L

. 0.037RV

0.590 : 0.531

0,4410.570

: 0.603 :

0.460 0.5570.530 0.510

0.540

0,521

0:525

0310

: 0.5000.420

0.920 0.485

: 0.535 :0.590.

0.510

0.556 :

0.560 : 0.510 -/A0.500

0.502 0.520

2.000 0.430 0.760

Rating

1 4. 02

: :1

. v.;i. 34 3

4

4

4

3

30

0 :: 2

:' \ 41

: 3 :v

3

: : 3 33

3: 4

0 0 0

Rating 1 (Questionable O(Poor) NR (Not Rated)

(Potassium) Mg 2.58 mg/L

0.14RV

2.66

2.54 2.59 2.582.57 2.30

2.54 3.22

2.68

2.42

2.58 2.56

2.50

2.804.20 2.41 2.80 2.60 2.613.10 2.64 4.15 2.31

2.56

2.68

2.62 3.91 3.30 2.752.50 2.35 2.83 2.52 2.853.21 2.50 3.00 2.80 3.08

Rating3

44 44 1

4 0

3

2

4 4

3

10 2 1 440 4 01

4

3

4 0 0 23 1 1 4 10 3 0 1 0

Absolute Z -value 1.51-2.00 greater than 2.00

(Magnesium) Na (Sodium) (total Phosphorus) as P 18.0 mg/L 39.0 mg/L 0.032 mg/L

1.0 1.9 0.011RV Rating RV

17.8 4 39.3 16.9 2 17.9 4 39.3 18.5 3 39.7 18.5 3 49.018.8 3 40.6 17.8 4 39.6

17.8 4 41.1 17.6 4 42.2

18.1 4 42.6 18.3 4

18.4 4 39.9

17.8 4 39.3 18.4 4 38.5

1.1 0 19.7 1 42.4

18.6 3 41.515.6 0 34.8 17.7 4 36.0 19.0 2 39.0 18.0 .4 36.0 18.1 4 39.822.8 0 41.1 17.6 4 39.2 19.4 2 48.3 19L2 2 38.2 17.6 414.0 0 37.0

39.1

182 4 38.7 16.6 .2. 37.0 9.8 0 39.0

16.6 2 37.517.0 2 39.0 17.4 3 45.9 21.4 0 37.5 17.8 4 38.1 17.5 3 40.8

46.9 10.4 0 34.0 13.3 0 50.0 20,7 0 44.2 30.8 0 20.6

Rating RV4 6.030

0.028 4 0.030 4 0,032 0 <0.023 <0.05 4 0.020

0^033 2 0.035 1 <0.1

1 : 0.029 :0.041

4 0,052

4 0,050 4 0.034

1 0.043 0.020

2 0.04001 ,... .. '-;.......4 :..- '.V A.;.;.-. - ;

1 :-:;,.; - : : ,. :42 0.030 4 : 0.030 :: : 0 : . 0.050 4 0.040

0:0222 0:032

0.030

4 0:050

42 4 OJ100 3 O.:i434 0.040 0 : 3 43 ::0 0 0 0 0.710 0 0.141

Rating4 4 4 4

NRNR 24 : . 4

NR

4 31

1 4

-.3 ';:

2 3

4 : :4 : : :

1 3

:3 :4

:: -4 -: .

1

0 0;

:s:

0 0

2/6 16.0

32

Page 36: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 7. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents) Continued

(MPV.most probable value; mg/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; nS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/1S, number of reported values of 16 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =

Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

PH: 8.28

. 0.17

Absolute 2 -value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51-1.00 1.01-1.50

Si02

Rating 1 (Questionable) O (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

(Silica) SO< 7.35 mg/L 0.46

Absolute Z -value 1.51 -2.00 greater than 2.00

(Sulfale) SpCond Sr (Strontium) 150 mg/L 600 jiS/cm : : :67rf u,g/L

7 19 3t

V (Vanadium) 3.42 u.g/L 3.01

Lab RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating1 2 3 4 57 10 . 11 13 1516 18 19 22 2324 25 26 28 3032 33 36 38 3940 42 43 46 4850 51 55 56 5759 64 68 69 7075 76 80 81 8385 86 87 : 89 9092 96 97 102 105107 109 113 114 118119 121 127128 129

8.21 8.04 7.83

: : 8.178.20 8.42 8.26 8.36 8.118.10 8.25 8.55

8288.20 8.36:: : .8.33

8.408.40 8.28 8.33 8.40 8.408.35 7.90 8.21 8.38 8.008.31

:. 8.29 8.00 8.35 8.20.8.40 8,38 8.38 8.40. 8.288,27 .

. .8.26 8.17 8-37 .

8:37 . .8:35 .

: 7.95 : 8.39

8.14 8.34 8.37

8.348.49 8.42 8.32 8.07 . 7.90 .

. 8.50

8.31 . 8.43 7.99

4/:/ 2

0

34 3 4 4 22 4 1

'. A4 44 :

33 4 4 3 34 0 4 3 14

.,-:' A :: t

. \ 44.3

: 3 : 3 3 4

: . 4

. . :' 3 3

3.4 ..:

' 1

3 4 3

4

34 2 02

A

1

6.89

8.43

7.08

7.30

7.37 7.97

7.44

7.757.76

11.04 7.53

7.50 7.10

7.29

7.18 8.00 7.50 7.04

7.30

7.36

7.407.70

7.05

7.10

5.50 7.24 6.767.32

7.18 6.80

7.37 6.66 7.457.21

7.34

7.477.00 7.12 7.21 7.79 7.95

3

0

3

4

4 2

4

33 0 4

4 3

4

4 2 4 3

4

4

43

3

3

0 4 24

4 2

4 2 44

4

43 4 4 3 2

150 152 142 152 151155 151 5

150 140143 148 149

158150 148 150

150: 146

147 160

150119 197. 150 185 104149 156 133 149 140148 151

158 146153

130 145 151148

.127 148

147 145

. 153 143 140

155 154 152

143

159 155 150

4 4 2 4 43 4 0 4 22 4 4

244 .., 4

43 4 2

40 0 4 0 0 .4 30 4244 ::

2 34

03 44

04

4 3 4 2 2

3 3 4

2

23 4

600 586 608

612571 606 597 608 599598 563 666

568600 607 606

601 571 70

612 584608 604 600 599 608622 580 625 597 660588 613 608

587610

600 600

624 320 589 552597 618 625 719 615591 591 590 608 590597

595 615 582

4 3 4

31 4 4 4 44 1 0

14 4 4

41 0 3 34 4 4 4 42 2 2 4 03 3 4

33

4 4

2 0 3 043 2 034 4 3 4 34

4 3 3

666

784 . .

670

17

628 . 650

693.676. . 730; :

:671 :.:

679 :685

650 656 ;; :

644

. 675 : ;

673

662.;

7:18 .. . .666

578 732.

.554

680

678 . 631

4

Q

4

0

2. 3 .

34

4 4

3 4:

H4

: :: 4- ..

: 1 4

0 10

4

: . 4 ' 2 :

1.40 3

3.00 4

<4 MR

<50 MR < 10 MR5.19 3<5 MR

<5 MR

<4 MR 10.20 0

<5 MR

<200 MR

< 100 MR

50.00 0

<50 MR

<3 MR

<20 MR : 5.73 3

<10 MR

<=0 MR

< 13 MR

1.40 3

33

Page 37: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 7. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents) Continued

(MPV.most probable value; mg/L, micrograms per liter; mg/U, milligrams per liter. jiS/em, microsiemens per centimeter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/16, number of reported values of 16 possible values; RV. reported value; <, less than)

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =

Rating Absolute Z-value Rating Absolute Z-value 4 (Excellent) 0.00-0.50 1 (Questionable) 1.51-2.00 3 (Good) 0.51-1.00 O(Poor) greater than 2.00 2 (Satisfactory) 1 .01 - 1 .50 NR (Not Rated)

pH : SiO2 (Silica) SO4 (Siitfate) SpCond Sr (Strontium) 8.28 7.35 mg/L 150 mg/L 600 jiS/cm 671 ng/L 0.17 0.46 7 19 31

V (Vanadium) 3.42 ng/L 3.01

Lab :RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating132 133 134 138 140141 142 143 145 146149151 155 158 180183 190 191193 -,: 196203 204 212 213 215217 218 219 220 221224 234 235 236 240241 243 244 247 249253 255 256 257 258259 261 262 265 268270 271 272 273 274

8.05 8.15 8!44 8.29 8.338.35 8.26 8.38 8.30 8.15 :8.40 8.39 8,24 8.26 8.408.33 8.10 8.39

8,31 8.16 8.30 8.35 8;256:40 8.02

8.088.17 : 8-13 '

8.24 8.248.30 7.91 8.34 8.56 : 7.98 :8,20 8.49 8.05 8.21 6.20s;So

. 7,95. . 7 428.12: 8.10

7.83 8;28:

: $20 7.90

2 3 3 4 444 3 433 3 4 4 . 34 2 3

4 34 .:- 4

: 431

23 3

4 44 0 4 1 142/-.2' '

. 4 4

. 2 .;:

1

0 3 2

:0 4

: 4 0

7.47 7.14 7.40

8.41

7.95

5.88 7.08

7.70 8.71

6.90 7.42 7.90

8.086.08

7.50

7.20 8.26 4.66 6.887.68

7.38 6.65

7.00

6.85

14.93

4 4 4

0

2

0 3

3 0

3 4 2

10

4

41 0 23

41

3

2

0

152 149 155156 163

149 155160 151

152 140

177 149

:: 149 145168 155 156

155158

40 148 146152 153 174 152 147152

143 141117 120 154 195 200148 16

150 155 154

. 17

149

4 433 1

.4 3 .2 4

4 2

0 4 4 30 3 3

32

o:. 4

34 4 0 4 44

V20 0 3 0 04 0 43 3

0

4

457

606 597 708607 604

615 595612 602 631 609 620535 604

568

598 594 637

574625 556

560 611

589 576414 595 600 595 617625 595

600 539609 522 582

560

545 645 620 634

0

4 4 044

3 43 4 1 4 20 4

1

4 4 1

22 0

0 3

3 20 4 4 432 4

4040 3

0

0 02 1

654 3 <1 .658 4 <2

<10 694 3 3.42

699 3 4.70 <10

710 2

4.95

958 0: ..-1 : ' : : : " :o

660 4 2.10

578 0 673 4

. 700 3 1.00

8.30 668 4 2.02 709 : 2 <5 649 3 3.80

1.00

: :; 1.40

39.00

680 4

658 4: ^ 1.20

770 0

NR NR

NR4

4 NR

3

4

3

1 4 NR 4

3

3

0

3

276^550

34

Page 38: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 8. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample N-51 (nutrient constituents)

(MPV.most probable value; ug/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/5, number of reported values of 5 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating4 (Excellent)3 (Good)2 (Satisfactory)

Analyte = NH5 asN(Ammonia)

Absolute Z-value0.00 - 0.500.51 -1.001.01 -1.50

: ::-. : ./ : NH(An

MPV = 0.07 mg/L

Lab1257

101113151618212223252833363839464853555658596468697075808183858788899091929697

102104105110113114118119127128129132133134138140141

F-pseudosigma =OLR V/53.0 32.5 40.5 22.0 13.8 42.7 3NR 00.0 22.2 52.8 43.6 52.0 10.0 13.0 40.0 23.0 1NR °3.0 52.0 33.0 23.5 41.0 32.8 43.3 41.0 43.3 33.5 22.3 4NR 04.0 1NR 0NR 03.3 33.0 13.4 52.8 41.3 33.0 44.0 13.5 23.7 33.3 32.8 42.7 33.4 53.3 34.0 14.0 14.0 12.0 43.0 43.5 23.0 23.8 42.5 43.0 53.6 53.0 43.7 31.0 3

0.05RV

0,030.050,150;13

0.090.17

<0.02<0.05

0.080.140.01

<0,1

0.080.340.04

0.010.10

0.110.110.120.040.03

. 0.050.060.15

<0.1

<0.02<0.05<:O.Q1

0.030.070.040:020.08

<0.03

0.090,10

0.010.080.10

<0.1

0.040,030.020.110.000,080.080.040.030.070.17

Rating341241

NRNR422 .

NR403

23

33333441

NR

NR: NR

NR34434

NR

; 4

3

244

.NR3333

NR444341

Rating1 (Questionable)O(Poor)NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value1.51 2.00greater than 2.00

3 + Org N as N NO3 + NO3 as Nnmonia*

0.290.10

RV0220.50

0260.36

0.530.110.170.29

0.500.08

0.25

0.39

0.300.230.480.20

0.33

0.29

0.40

0.200.12

0.15

0.32

0.230.330.300.27

<0.2

0.240.360.310.200.30

0.240.30028021

<1

Organic N) (Nitrate + Nitrite)mg/L

Rating30

43

0124

00

4

3

4313

4

4

2

31

2

4

3444

NR

43434

4443

NR

CL01 mg/L0.04 RV

< 0.005<o:o2<0.03

' < 0;05

<0.01

<0.06<Qj02

0.07<0.01

0.01

<0.050.01

*0,050.00

*0.080.40

<0,02

<0.04cO.02.

0,01<0.05<0.1«0.1

<0,010.01

<0.020.04

<0,011.16

<0.05

<OJ020.01

<0.05< 0.003

0.00< 0.04

< 0,015<0.04

0.080.01

<OJ)1< 0.01

0.000.110.180.00

< 0.0050.00

<0.05

total P as P(total Phosphorus)

Rating NRNRNRNRNR

NRNR

1NR4

NR4

NR4

NR0

NR

NRNR4

NRNRNR :NR 4::-

NR3

NR.0NR

NR4

NR:NR

-.4

NR

NRNR. 14

NR.NR

4004

MR4

NR

0.040.01

RV0.030.05

0.050.04

<0.050.120.070.030.040.06

<0.1

<0.050.060.000.030.04

0.040.030.130.03

0.08

<0.1

0.03< 0.075

0.040.05

0.04

0.050.030.030.010.030.050.02

0.030.040.010.06

<0.01

0.040.030.040.040.05

<0.020.06

mg/L

Rating34

34

NR01342

NR

NR2034

4303

0

NR

4NR43

4

3430242

4402

NR

43443

NR2

PO4 as P(Orthophosphate as P} ' '

0.02 mg/L0.O1

RV< 0.001 ;

0.000,04 :-.:

0.02

<0.05<:O.Q2 :

.-.-.; .o;o2:0.020.02

<0,1:o.o2 .0.04

< .0.01<0.05

: -0.010.010.01

. 0.020.120.080.020.10

<0.010,01

<0.1

«0.05< 0.005

0.010.020.01

.-.. 0.05 ::;:;.0.01 ;

. 0.02<o!or ::

0.010.000.010.02

< 0.004:

<0.010.00

<0.05<0,01

0:030.01

. 0.010.000.00

<0.010.05

RatingNR

20

'4 ' :;

NRNR . A : '-:

AA

NR40

NRNR33 ..3400

4 :0

NR3

NR

NRNR.'3 '

4 3 '

.0": 3"' "

3 -.: NR ; : :

42

: 3A

NR :: :

NRNRNRNR3 : : :

3322

NR0

35

Page 39: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 8. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample N-51 (nutrient constituents) Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ug/L, micrograms per liter rng/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/S, number of reported values of 5 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)

Rating

4 (Excellent)

3 (Good)

2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value

0.00 - 0.50

0.51-1.00

1.01-1.50

Rating

1 (Questionable)

O (Poor)

NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value

1.51-2.00

greater than 2.00

Analyte =

MPV =

F-pseudosigma =

Lab

142 143 145 146 149151

155 158

180 183190 191 193 196 197203 204 212 213 215

220

221 224

234 240241 243 247 253

OLR

2.6 3.6 3.5 NR 2.53.3

3.2 3.0

3.5 2.01.8 4.0 3.0

NR 3.03.5 3.0 3.3

4.0 2.02.7

2.8 2.2

3.3 0.73.6 3.0 4.0 4.0

V/55 5

20 43 5

3

2 25 1 1 0

24 3 3 1 2

3 5

5 3 35

21

1

NH3 as N NH3 + Org N as N :

(Ammonia) . . : : (Ammonia+Organic N) 0.07- mg/L 0.29 mg/L 0.05 ' 0.10

RV

0.02 0.01

<0.02 <0.03

0.010.06 0.10 0.04

<0.02

0.10

0.130.08

< 0.005 «=0.1

<0.010.00 0.04 0.120:07OJ9

0,01 0.04

Rating3 2

NR NR 243

: 3 NR

3 .:

24

NR NR NR

. NR2

- 3 " :: "

2 4 0

: 2 . :- . .

RV

0.20 0.29 0.21

0.21

0.21

0.40

0.35 0.19 0.33

0.51

0.48 0.45

0.470.26

0.29

Rating3 4 3

3

3

2

3 3 4

NR 0

1 1

1

4

4

NO3 + NO2 asN total P as P PO4 asP

(Nitrate + Nitrite) : . (total Phosphorus) (Orthophospbate as P) .0.01 rng/L ; 0.04 mg/L 0.02. mg/Lv

0.04: '' . ' :: 0.01 0.61 :. :" 'RV :

0.02 0.03

<0.02 <0.05

0.12<0.05

0.00 <0.02 <0.01

0.01<o.oi< 0.02 <0.05 .

0.02<0.02 <0.02

<0.010.01 .

0.02 0.06

<0.01

0.01 <OD1 <0.01

Rating4

:: 4 : ..

NR NR 0

NR 4 .

NR NR

4 . NR

NR NR4

:NR NRNR

NR4 4 2

NR MR4

NR NR

RV

0.05 0.05 0.04

0.040.05

0.03 0.03

0.05 0.05

0.14

0.03

0.05 0.03 0.05

0.04 0.04

0.03

. 0.03 0.03

0.070.03 0.05

Rating3 4 4

NR 43 3 3

4 30

3

4 2 34 4

3

3 3

14 3

RV

0.08 0.01

<0.01 «=0.05

0.020.03

0.01 0.02

<0.01 . 0.030.14 0.02

<0:05

0.02 0.01 0.01

<0.02 <0.01

0.00

0.01: 0.02 0.01

0.02

0.02

Rating0 4 .

NR NR 43 3'

3 . NR

10 4

NR

3-::: .

4 3

. NR NR

23 - ; --

3 3 ":

NR

: ' -4 : :

36

Page 40: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 9. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample N-52 (nutrient constituents)

(MPV.most probable value; ug/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/5, number of reported values of 5 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value0.00-0.50 0.51-1.00 1.01 -1.50

Rating 1 (Questionable) O(Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51 -2.00 greater than 2.00

Analyte = NH3.as N .1.33 NH3 » Org N as N NO5 + NO2 asN total P as P PP*asP Ammonia) 0.03 (Ammonia+Organic N) (Nitrate +' Nitrite) (total Phosphorus) (Orthophosphate as P)

MPV= . 1.33 mg/L ' 2.37 mg/L 1.72 mg/L 1.50 mg/L 1.16 mgA. . F-pseudosigma = ; 0.09 ' 0.22 O.tO 0.06 0.06

Lab13 5 7

1011 1315 16 1819 22 23 25 2630 33 36 38 424648 53 55 5657 58 59 64 6869 70 75 76 8081 83 85 86 8788 89 90 91 9296 97

102 104 105107 108 113 114 118119 127 128 129 132

OLR3.4 3.0 2.0 1.3 3.63.2 3.8 2.6 1.6 2.63.5 4.0 1.3 2.42.04.0 2.5 2.0 3.60.32.02.0 2.0 3.6 1.01.4 1.5 4.0 4.0 2.84.0 3.4 2.0 4.0 2.02.6 2.8 3.2 3.0 2.41.0 3.8 3.0 3.3 3.73.8 3.2 2.24.0 3.03.0 3.3 2.6 1.3 2.22.6 2.4 3.5 1.8 2.3

V/55 5 3 4 554 5 5 541 3 5 22 2 5 535 5 3 5 55 4 5 3 41 5 1 1 35 4 5 3 53 5 1 4 35 5 5 5 54 4 5 3 55 54 54

RV1.36 1.27 1.38 1.10 1.321.42 1.30 1.11 1.25 1.371.34

0.93 1.14 1.42

1.22 1.44 1.33

1..32 1.20 1.30 1.37 1.501.22 1.18 1.35 1.34 1:59

1.24

.1.29 1.301.50 1.20 1.25 1.37 1:00.1.09 1.32 1.38 1.34

1.37 1.34 1.00 1.33 1,36rt.39t.291.38 1.10 1.261,42 1.68 1.30 1.18 1.32

Rating43 3 0 42 4 0 3 44

. 0 0 2

,.2

2 4

42 4412 1 4 40

3

4 .4

12 3 4 00 43 .

4

4 4 0 4 43 4 3 0 32 0 4 1 4

RV2.162.20

2.482.58

2.58 1.94 1.89

2.64

2.15 2.23

2.24 2.30

2.40 2.743.60 2.49 2.30

2.42

2.34

2.15

2.43

2.10

2.22

2.43

2.39 2.23 2.23 2.43 1.50

2.34 2.14

2.471.87 2.66 2.50 2.18

Rating3 3

33

3 1 0

2

3 3

3 4

410 3 4

4

4

3

4

2

3

4

4 3 3 4 0

42

40 2 3 3

RV1.70 1.80 1.30 1.54 1.741.71 1.72 :: 1.72 1.73 1.831.78

1.77

1.74

1.90 1.70

28.101.48 1.61 1.84 1.73 1.791.90

1.74 1.72 1.681.76 1.58 1.61

0.861.72 1.59 1.55 1.72 1.742.49. 1.72

1.62 1.791.64 1.65 1.83 1.69. 1.761.74 1.75 :

1.50 2.29 1341.64 1.71 1.72 1.75. 1.53

Rating4 3 0 1 44 4 4 4 23

. 4

4

1 4

. . 0.0

2 2 4 31

A 4442 2

04 2 1

;;.- : 4

4.. 0 .

4

2 333 2 4 444

.0 0 03 4 4 4 1

RV

1.55 1.55

1.64 1.621.58 1.61 1.68 1.97 1.591.64 1.59 1.43 1.68

1.40 1.57 1.501.55 1.50

1.56 1.101.60 1.54 1.60

1.64

1.62

1.59 1.60 1.61 1.69 1.63

1.62

1.63 1.601.58 1.52 1.57 1.61 1.651.66

1.60 1.60 1.901.62 1.54

1.50 1.63

Rating3 3

3 44 4 2 0 43 4 02

0 4131

304 2 4

3

4

4 4 4 13

4

34 .4 2 3 4 32

44042

13

RV .1:20

1:12 .1.12 1,05 1.201.13 1.2G 1.15 :l.4S . 1.19

.; 1.14

':1.14

1.17 1'241,16: in 2. 1.15::'. its ; a.58 :

. 0.12 1.05 3.4& 1.21 0:661.30 a.92 1.16 1.17

1.16

1.241.06 1.20 1.15

1.191.1-1 1.16

1.18: :1.14 1.16 1.11

. .i.17 ' : : 1-17

: 1.12 : 1.28

1.15

1.181.18 1.16 1:19 1.041.25

Rating .3 3 : ;' : ' : '3

1 33

: -3 4 0 34

44

. .;.. 2

4 ' ' 3

.4 3 00 1q: :

:3/ - &:0 0 44

4

;/ 2.-.: -1 : ;3

4

33

.v.4-.: :

44:'.' 4

3 4 43

. 1. : :. 4-

;444 30 '' :

::1

37

Page 41: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 9. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample N-52 (nutrient constituents) Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ug/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter Lab, laboratory number OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/5, number of reported values of 5 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51 - 1.00 1.01-1.50

Rating 1 (Questionable) O (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51-2,00 greater than 2.00

Analyte = NHj as N 1 .33 . NH3 + Org N as N NO3 + NQi as N total P as P P O4 as P

Ammonia) .. 0.09 . (Ammonia+Organic N) (Nitrate + Nitrite) (total Phosphorus) (Qrthophbsphate as P) MPV= 1.33 mgfl_ 2.37 mg/L 1.72 mg/L 1.60 mg/L 1.16 mg/L

F-pseudosigma = 0.09 : . 0.22 . 0.10 0.06 0.06Lab

133 134 138 140 141142 143 145 146 155158 180 183 190 191193 197 203 204 212213 215 220 221 224234 240 241 243 247248 249 253 255

OLR

Z43.6

3.2 1.8

3.42.8 3.4 3.2 0.0

2.63.8 3.4 2.0 1.6 3.5

2.5 4.0

2.4 2.8 2.81.5

2.2 1.3 2.4^o3.3 2.6 3.4 3.03.0

2.0 1.4 1.4 3.5

V/55 5 5

5

55

5 5 4

5 :4 53 . :5 ...

2

2 2

5 4 54 5 3

5 54

5 53 .. 2

4

5 5 4

RV

1.35 1.37 1.28 :

1.52 1.261.26 1,34 1.45 3.57 1.291.36

7.1.-32

1.55

1.34 1.41 1.35 1.301.50 1.35 1.36*

1.31 i:40 :1.40 1.32 1.35 1.24

. :- 1.40 0.74 1.29 1.25

Rating 4

4 3

0

334 2 0

44 4

0

4 3 4 41

4 4

4 33

: : : 4 '

4 3

3 04

: : -:.3-..

RV

2.05 2.30 2.38 2.35 2.562.33 2.53 2.34

2.12

2.47

2.70

1.44 2.48 2.504.00 2.51

2.30 3.70

2.42 2.15

2.57 3.62 <5

Rating2 4

4 . 4 3

4 3 4

2

4

1

0

3

30 3

4 0

4 3

3 0

NR

RV

2.16 1.73 1.66 1.66 1.721.98 1.85 1.68 4.54 1.661.76 1.74 0.15 1.B2 1.731.63 1.74 1.83 135

16.40

1.72 2.04 1.87 1.701,65 1.60 1.81 1.76 1.780.76 6.71:o.92 1.72

Rating0 4 3

340 2 4 0 34 4

. 0

3

43 4 3 0 0

4 0

2 4-

3 2 3 4 3

o0 04

RV

1.63 1.65

1.52

1.66 1.591.65 1.60 1.66

4.03 1.52

1.60 1.68 1.58 1.22

1.67

1.63 1.59 1.601.58 0.82

1.76 1.55

1.62 2.03 1.56 1.67

1.56 1.75 1.43 1.58

Rating3

3

2 2 4

3 4

2 0

2

4 : 2 4

0

2

4

44

4 0

0 34 0 3 2

3 0 0 4

RV

1.12 1,19 i.15

1.01 1.211.15 1.15

1.17 3.48 1.0S

1.10 1'19

1:10 1.14 1.21

1.22

1201.06 0;54 1.32 1.0& 1,311.11 1:21 1.16

1.19123 1.18

. 1.20 1,13

Rating3 3 4 0344 40 23

::'3

2 . 4 3;-;.

: : ;.-2

3

1 0

0

2 0

. :3. .3

. :4

32 4 3 3

38

Page 42: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 10. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength)

(MPV.most probable value; ug/L, micrograms per liter rng/L, milligrams per liter Lab, laboratory number OLR, overall laboratory rating for for all reported values; V/11, number of reported values of 11 possible values: RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51 -1.00 1.01 -1.50

Rating 1 (Questionable) O (Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51-2.00 greater than 2.00

Analyte = Acidity as CaCCv Ca (Calcium) Ct (Chloride) F (Fluoride) K (Potassium) Mg (Magnesium)MPV= 4.74 mg/L : 2.53 mg/L 1.20 mg/L 0.100 mg/L ; 0.336 mg/L :; 0.461 mg/L

F-pseudosigma = : 3.19 : 0.24 .0.49 0.033 0.038 ...''""> 0.050Lab

1 2 357

15 23 25 26 2833 36 38 39 4246 48 5859 6481 83 89 92

105107 109 110 113 119132 134 138 140 141143 145 146 155 158180 183190 191 193196 197 203 204 215220 221 224 235 240241 243244 247 255

OLR3.8 2.0 2.0 2.3 3.81.9 3.7 3.1 3.4 1.53.8 2.5 3.6 2.2 2.43.3 1.9 1.9 3.5 3.93.4 3.2 3.4 3.02.93.6 2.6 3.3 3.0 3.12.1 3.9 3.9 2.2 3.53.7 2.8 2.8 2.0 1.33.9 1.7 3.1 2.2 3.04.0 3.5 1.3 2.7 2.82.9 2.43.2 2.0 3.12.2 2.0 4.0 2.8 3.7

V/119 8 9 8 59 6 8 948 47 5 57 9 9 4 810 6 10 2 87 10 6 8 97 9 9 9 103 9 5 387 3

10 6 13 2 36 97 7 10 5 89 2 26 6

RV2.50

<10

7.42 5.20<2

27.00

::x : : ;6.85' :

0.50 5.10 2.26

0.42

. 6.57

5.08;

2.40

<:10

: :6.oo

3.607.21

4.01

188

0.20.

Rating.3

NR3 4

NR

0

-. 3.;.;.-

24 3

:2

3

4

3

NR

- 4

4 /. 3 ,.

4

3

2

RV2.50 2.80 2.40 2.41

2.82 2.60 2.50 2.96 2.852.37 2.40 2.47

3.302.442.53 1.70 <5

2.502.422.50 2.29

2.582.39 2.58 1.45 2.86 2.572.71 2.602.60 2.39 2.74

2.67 2.43 2.72 3.162.62

2.19 2.32

2.752.602.50 2.52 2.59 2.75 2.652.30

2.57

Rating4 2 3 4

24 4 1 23 3 4

04 4 0

NR44 4 3

434 0 243 4 4 3 3

3 4 30 .4

23

3 44 4 4 3 43

4

RV1.20; 1.13 1.78. 2.39. . 1.131.63 1.27 1.20 1.13

1.24<5' : "

2.00 1.101.65 2.00 1.49 1.10 1.201.15 <5

1.29

1.14<0.6. 1.01 1.13 1.98 1.18

1.17 1.07 0.87 1.401.20 1.04 1.53

: 0.27..1.00

: 1:01: . 1.09 1.83

1.19 0.94

: : < 2

1.40 2:001.18 1.47 . 1.36

1.133.50

1.80 <5

Rating4 4

. :: : 2 0

434 4

[ 4

4 NR

1 43 1 3 4 44

NR4

4NR4 :

414

'"'' 4

A : : :; 3

44 4 3

14

:. 4 : 4

2

4 3

NR 414 . 3 4

40

2 NR

RV<0.1

0.063

<0.5

0.108 <0.1 0.100 0.120

<0.1

0.006

0.240 0.092<0.2

0.069 0.170 0.537

<0.2

0.077 0.090

0.090 0.100

0.120 0.101 0.053 0.130

0.080. <0.2

0.073

0.106

0.100

0.450

0.0760.116

0.100 <0.2

RatingNR

2

NR4

NR 4 3

NR

0

0 4

NR

3 0 0

NR3 4

4 4

3 4 2 3

3 NR

3

4

4

0

34

4 NR

RV0.330 0.330 0.330

<T

0.511 : 0.350

0.350 0-1900.300 . :<0.5 .0;320

0.4000.330 . 0;3800:350

. <5 0.3200.336

<2

0.333

<0.5

0.340 ;;0.270

0.288 0.000 :0:550: 0.343 : 0,330 0.289 : 0.351

: 0.290: ' <^ '

0.350 ;<1.26 :

0.319 :T: :ft0.v

<1: 0.300 : 0.329 0.332 0.460

0.370

0.367

Rating,:,v4 . .

..v.v^;.y

:: :: A -,. NR

V.V.Q.V.

..'. 4

. A:-

03

NR 4

1,: .--.:4'... ;. . 2 : ::;

: :-.4.-.::.: NR

- 4 :4

NR - : : 4 :: .-.

NR4i

. .2 :: .;..; 0 ;:0

:x 4 . : . " >.. 4-. .

... 2 : \, " 4.: X' : :

2NR;

.. .-. ;. .;

NR

:' ' ' 4' '

: .:o

NR3. .

,. : '4 ' :'. ' " A-:'-

: 0

3

3

RV0.450 0.545 0.420 0.434

0.639 <0.5 0.420 0.470 0.4500.440 <0.5 0.437

0.5000.442 0.500 0.320

<5

0.4500.433 0.434 0.453

0.3870.450 0.490 0.450 0.504 0.4100.450 0.447 0.460 0.467 0.486

0.490 <0.5

0.5500.469

0.427 0.470

3.580 0.4600.400 0.461 0.519 0.490 0.4300.300

0.470

Rating4 1 3 3

0 NR 3 4 44

NR 4

34 3 0

NR43 3 4

24 3 4 3 24 4 4 4 3

3 NR

14

3 4

0 42 4 2 3 30

4

39

Page 43: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 10. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength-Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ug/L, micrograms per liter rng/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number; OLR, overall laboratory rating for for all reported values; V711. number of reported values of 11 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Absolute Z-value 0.00 - 0.50 0.51 -1.00 1.01 -1.50

Rating 1 (Questionable) O(Poor) NR (Not Rated)

Absolute Z-value 1.51 -ZOO greater than 2.00

Analyte = MPV =

F-pseudosigma =Lab256 257 258 261 262265 268 270 271 272273 276

OLR1.3 2.2 0.4 0.9 2.42.4 3.0 0.3 1.1 1.01.7 1.8

V/117 10 97 97 8 3 8 99 6

Acidity as CaC03 Ca (Calcium) Ct (Chloride) F (Fluoride) 4.74 mg/L 2.53 mg/L 1.20 mg/L 0.100 mg/L 3.19 0.24 0.49 0.033RV

:1,25

15,005.20 4.40

Rating. RV2.50

2. 2.80 1.60 3.26 2.502.90 1.42 1.06 4.28

0 2.414 2.80

:-4 1.80

Rating4 2 0 0 41 0 0 0 32 0

RV1.95 1.63 8.40 OJOO 1.300.95 1.11

2.00 7.09

13.00 3.50

Rating1 3 0 0 43 4

1 00o

RV

0.085 0.170

0.082

0.4050.400

Rating

4 0

3NR

00

K (Potassium)

0.336 mg/L

(X038RV

0.000 0.200 0.500 <0.39 0.3500.370 0.365 0.4tO 0.900 0.0000.412

Rating0 0 0

NR 43 3 1 0 01

Mg (Magnesium) 0.461 mg/L 0.050

RV1.500 0.630 1.940 1.950 0.4400.720 0.480

10.370 0.0000.521 1.400

Rating0 0 0 0 40 4

0 020

40

Page 44: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 10. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength)-Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ug/L, micrograms per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number, OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values; V/11, number of reported values of 11 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating Absolute Z-value 4 (Excellent) 0.00-0.50 3 (Good) 0.51-1.00 2 (Satisfactory) 1.01-1.50

Analyte = Na (Sodium) pH MPV= 1.34 mg/L 6.92

F-pseudosigma = 0.10 0.32

Rating Absolute Z-value 1 (Questionable) 1.51 -2.00 0 (Poor) greater than 2.00 NR (Not Rated)

PO4 asP S04 (Sulfate) 0.002 mg/L 2.42 mg/L 0.014 0.37

Specific Conductance 26.1 nS/cm

1.1Lab RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating

1 23 : : :

5 7

15 23 25 26 2833 36 38 39 4246 48 58 .59 '"'': .

6481 83 89 92

105107 109 110 113 119132 134 138 140 141143 145 146 155 158180 183 190191193 : ;196 197 203 204 215220 . 221 224 235 240241 243 244 247 255

1.34 2.02 0.78 1.34

1.76 1.43 1.36 1:32 0;941.30 1.20 1.24

1.301-31 1.38 0.96 <5

1.291.24 1.33. 1.31

1.181.34 1.36 1.32. .1.30-;

1.351.50 134 1.35 1.43 1.39

1.34: 1.26

0.961.34;

1.39:

.2-07

1.601.30 1.45 1,34 1.19

1.30

1.33

4 0 0-

4

0 3 4 404 23

44 4 0

NR : :'' 4

34 4

14 44 44'

.1 . 4

4 34

4 3

: 0;.: 4 ;-.

4Q- ..

042 .. 4 2

4

4

6.99 6.33 6.22 6.21 6.986.23 6.93 7.13 6.95

6.74 6.96 7.10 6.90

7.58 6.40 8.07 6.69 7.016.88

7.01 7.03 6.657.15 6.17 7.03 7.05 6.497.15 6.93 6.78 6.42 6.966.697.30 6.90 6.53 4.697.10 7.46 6.60

6.50 6.74 7.05

6.09 6.76

6.746.83 8.23 6.98 7.01 7.20

4 1 0 040 4 3 4

3 4 3 4

0 1 0 3 44

4 4 33 0 4 4 23 44 1 43 2 4 2 031 3

2 3 4

0 4

340 4 4 3

< 0.001

<0.01

<0.16<0.02 <0.01

<0.5 0.002

<0.01 < 0.025

0.001 < 0.005

0.002

< 0.005 0.010

0.001< 0.005

0.009 < 0.002 < 0.005.

0.002< 0.002

< 0.004 0.000

<0.01 0.000

< 0.004 <Q.Q1 <0.050:002

<0.01 <0.05 0.001

<0.01

0.021 0.400

<0.05

< 0.002 0.030

0.001 . <0.5 <0.1

0.003

< 0.001

NR

NR

NRNR NR

NR NRNR NR NR NR NR

NR NR

NRNR NR NR NR NRNR

NRNRNR NR NR NR NRNR NR NR NR

NR

NR NR

NR

NR NR

NR NRNRNR

NR

2.43 2.32 3.40 4.37 2.402.50 <2.5

2.46

2.34 <5

2.30 <2.52.40

60.00 2.00 2.30 2.442.65 2.52 2.48 1.88 2.28

3.70 2.34 <1

2.38

2.35 2.31 2.00 2.57

2.19 <5

30.502.60

2.80 2.38

2.40 2.36 2.86 2.03 3.168.90 0.41 2.62 2.89 2.682.00

2.80

4 40 0 44

NR

4

4 NR

4 NR40 2 4 43 4 4 2 4

0 4 .

NR4

4 4 2 4

3 NR

04

24

4 4 2 2 10 0 3 2 32

2

26.8 21.3 26.6 26.3 25:326.1 27.0 27.0 27.2

.: .. 25.8: .-.; 23.9 : 26.1 27.5

24.5 26.1 25.4 25.526.3

25.8

;- 27.0.26.0 .

: 27.p :

26.0 26.020.5 26.6 26.7 . . 32.5: 26.825.9

:. : :28.0. ;30.6 27.8 ;

. : ;26.1. ::26.0 23.2 27.6

26:8 ;

263.0 26.3 26.7

'25.0 ;;

24.720:0 '257 . ' 25.9 27.1 26.2

3 : 0-' . ' .

. 4 .' ' '.' 4 '

3. 4

3 3 3

.. 4 14 : 2

2 .' 4 : :

:- : :3. : ': : '...3--'-' '

: . 4

4

34 3

4: . : :4 ' '

04 .

::-:-.a

.-. 0 : -3

. 4.. 1

.&:.' -. 1 '

- : : :: :- : 4 '.:: :40 .

: : : : .; ; :-.2 : ': '

: . : - 3. .

0: : 4 '

3.': :

.3

./: 20

. 4 ..v.-

.- :4:-::: :3A ' ;

41

Page 45: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 10. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength-Continued

(MPV.most probable value; ug/L, micrograms per liter mg/L, milligrams per liter; Lab, laboratory number OLR, overall laboratory rating for all reported values: V/11, number of reported values of 11 possible values; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating Absolute Z-velue 4 (Excellent) 0.00 - 0.50 3 (Good) 0.51-1.00 2 (Satisfactory) 1.01-1 .50

Analyte = Na (Sodium) pH MPV= 1.34 TTig/L:-; 6.92

F-pseudosigma = 0.10 0.32

Rating Absolute Z-value 1 (Questionable) 1.51-2.00 O (Poor) greater than 2.00 NR (Not Rated)

PO<asP SO4 (Sulfate) 0.002 mg/L 2.42 mg/L 0.014 0.37

Specific Conductance 26.1 : uS/cm

1.1 :: ' :.' .-. : :

Lab RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating RV Rating256257258261262

0.921.201.502.301.46

7.047.036.306.445.18

0.0200.038

17.04NR 2.97NR L99NR < 0.5

6.38

25.5 29.4 26:1 24.0

265268270271272

1.191.38. .1168: 4.30. 2.00

6.766.76

6.987.21

0.150 NR

2.392.25

0.00

24.0

25.725.0

273276

1.46 7.036.89

4 o.OOO4

50.725.1

42

Page 46: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 11. Laboratory performance ratings for standard reference water sample Hg-23 (mercury)

(MPV.most probable value; ug/L, micrograms per liter; Lab, laboratory number; V/1 number of reported values of 1 value; RV, reported value; <, less than)Rating 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Satisfactory)

Analyte = MPV =

pseudosigma =Lab V/1

1 13 1 7 1

10 1 11 113 1 15 116 1 18 1 26 128 1 32 1 34 1 36 1 39 142 1 46 1 48 1 50 1 5155 58 59 68 6970 76 1 81 1 86 1 87 189 1 96 1 97 1

105 1 108 1113 1 119 1 127 1 133 1 134 1138 1 141 1 142 1 144 1145 1146 1 149 1 193 1 212 1 213 1215 1 219 1 221 1 234 1 235 1241 1 245 1 255 1 257 1 259 1

Absolute Z-value Rating Absolute Z-value 0.00-0.50 1 (Questionable) 1.51-2.00 0.51 - 1.00 O (Poor) greater than 2.00 1.01-1.50 NR (Not Rated)

Hg (Mercury) 0.34 jig/L 0-07 : :.:'.;

RV : Rating0:30 34:40 : - : : 00.34 4 0:33 4 0.28 3

< 0.4 NR: 0.29 : 3

0.35 :4:.:iL38 :: ..: ::3V

0.37 . ; : ::: ;: 4 .2.40 0'\::: -Q.29' : - :: -' : :'' : :::3-:: x

; 0.32 ..: ...... :. 4 : o;so 3

0.30 3OJ32 4

:: : ::.0j3V ;:;': :: : , 4 . 0.37 4

0.52 0 : : 6;39 :: :: :: . 3. : : >. :

O.3O 3:: :< 0.5: : ' . NR

'Oi32- ::::,;x. : 4w; : 0^5 -2 : '

y:v0.33--:v: : ,,.-::;4,:.O:4O 3

. :-0^9i-,:;:-.'---:.-3-:;--. :v-:6.30: : : : : : : ;: : :-:3:- : .

0131 : 3 : 0.50 : :;0 :0.39 30^7 4

:<0,42 : : NR : 0.37 4 : 0.53 0: .:. 0.39 v/ . : : ;: 3.v

0.39 3 0.32 : 4

-, 0.33v ..-,. . 4-.v . .0.28 ;''-. : . 3.0.32: : 4 : 0.43: 2 > 0.44- : -: ': - : 2

: 0.35},- :,: : ::. :;:. :4 : :" ' ' 0.43'- : :' : ^2; :.

O.36 4 0.35 4

.0^43 : :/ : 2'"-.

. ,.0,28'x . :-:; .-.3:::: .OJ5 ; 0

: O.92 0: :.::o.3Q; : :-: : :: . '3. :-: '" : :6.36:"' ' ':". :3 ::. : 03* A

0:43 '.' -20.39 3 0.2E 3 0.32 4 1.00 0 0.40: 3

43

Page 47: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)

Definition of analytical methods, abbreviations, and symbols___________ _____ __

Analytical methods0. Other/Not reported1. AA: direct, air2. AA: direct, N2O3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP5. DCP6. ICP/MS7. 1C

10. AA: extraction11. AA: hydride12. AA: flame emission 22. Color:

atomic absorption: direct.airatomic absorption: direct,nitrous oxideatomic absorption: graphite furnaceinductively coupled plasmadirect current plasmainductively coupled plasma/mass spectrometryion chromatographyatomic absorption: extraction [chelating agerrt(s) specified]atomic absorption: hydride [reducing agent specified]atomic absorption: flame emissioncolorimetric [color reagent specified]

Abbreviations and symbols

ConstituentAg SilverAl AluminiumAs ArsenicB BoronBa BariumBe BerylliumCa CalciumCd CadmiumCo CobaltCr ChromiumCu CopperFe IronK PotassiumLi Lithium

N = number of samplesMPV = most probable value

F-pseudosigma = nonparametric statistic deviationHu = upper hinge valueHI = lower hinge value

H9/L = micrograms per litermg/L = milligrams per liter

Lab = laboratory code numberNR = not rated, less than value reported

< = less than

page Constituent45 Mg Magnesium46 Mn Manganese47 Mo Molybdenum48 Na Sodium49 Ni Nickel50 Pb Lead51 Sb Antimony52 Se Selenium53 SiO2 Silica54 Sr Strontium55 TI Thallium56 u Uranium57 V Vanadium58 Zn Zinc

page5960616263646566676869707172

44

Page 48: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 43 (trace constituents)-ContinuedAg (Silver) jig/L

1. AAdirectair3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudoskpa =

6. ICP/MS

6 24 2113.0 6.7 14.526.0 40.0 143.0

19.5 20.01.7 1.5

1414.020.719.50.7

Lab Rating Z-value

MPV =F-pseudoagma =

N =Hu =H! =

19.81.465

20.618.7

137

11 1315 16 18 23 2630 32 36 39 404246 48 58 6869 70 73 75 7685 87 89 96 97102 105 107 113 114118 119 127 128 133134 138 141 142 146151 180 190 193 196

4 0 2 341 4 3 1 034 04 434 4 3 04 3 1 4 44 0 4 4 30 24 2 20 0 34 43 3 04 02 41 3 4

-0.15 -3.41 1.28 0.85 0.21-1.56 0.07 0.78 1.70 -2.98-0.57 0.07 -4.83 0.28 -0.36-0.57 0.14 0.14 0.85

14.340.00 -0.78 -1.99 0.21 -0.280.14 4.40 -0.50 0.43 -0.5787.47 -1.35 0.14 -1.21 -1.28-9.30 -2.34 -0.71 -0.21 -0.14-0.59 0.57 6.53 -0.36 -6.40-1.35 0.07 1.85 -0.57 -0.21

22.215.6

13.0

20.0 20.0 21.0 40.019.8 18.7

20.0 26.0

19.1 20.4 19.0

20.0 18.1

18.06.7

16.5 18.8

22.4 19.0

15.0 21.6 21.0 20.117.6

20.9

19.0

19.3

17.0 20.1

143.0

19.619.0 20.6 29.0

<10

19.9

19.6

19.9

19.9

20.2

19.0

19.4

17.9

19.5

19.3

17.9

19.5

Lab Rating Z-value212213215217221234235236241249

273

255 4256 0257 1259 3265 4

-4.12-0.43 5.82 0.64 1.63

19.2

22.1

28.0

14.0

20.7

0.570.14

-3.76-1.07-2.70

20.6

18.316.0

20.014.5

0.093.98 25.4

-1.99 17.0 0.85 21.0 0.28

19.9

20.29.37 33.0

45

Page 49: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)-ContinuedAl (Aluminum)

1. AA: direct air 2. AA: direct nitrous oxide 3. AA: graphite furnace

N = Minimum = Maximum =

Median = F-pseudosigma =

Lab1 3 4 7

1315 16 18 23 262832 33 36 4248 58 68 69 7075 76 81 83 8589 97

102 105 107113 118 119 127 128132 134 138 141 142145 146 151 180 190191 196 203 204 212

Rating4 0

NR1 4

NR 4

NR NR424 0

NR44 3 0 3

NRNR 4

NR NR NR4 4 4 4 44

NR 4

NR40 4 4

NR 30

NR 4

NR 34 4 4 4 4

Z-value-0.36 22.15

1.87

-0.43

1.23 0.06 9.38

0.11

-0.61 3.90

-0.23

-0.25 -0.12

-0.23

-0.31

-0.413.24 0.10

-0.25

0.624.36

-0.48

-0.01 -0.01

-0.13

4. ICP 5. DCP 6. ICP/MS

1 1 13 20 1 17.0 110.0 15.2 0.0 100.0

45.5 206.0 22.2 29.4 4.7 25.8

12345

206.0 <2000

37.6 22.2

<50

<100 <50 18.2

32.3

100.0 <200

18.5 17.0

54.5 16.5

<100<30

<25<100

23.1 25.7

20.0

23.020.2

<2000

<30

49.0 22.9

<100 27.358.3

<200

<40.6 16.7

18.6 24.6

14 18.1 26.9 20.6

2.16

19.1

18.5

22.6

23.0

20.2 <6

21.1

19.5

18.7

20.0

18.1

22.0 22.0

21.0

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =

Hl =

22.18.350

29.718.5

Lab Rating Z-value215 217 219 221 224234 235 236 240 241249 255 257 265 273

0 0 3 3 033 3 0 30 3 0 3 1

13.84 3.73 0.83

-2.66-0.51 -0.86 0.92

19.14

-0.86 10.59 0.57 -1.94

137.0 53.1 29.0

27.8 0.0

17.9 15.0 29.7

181.0 15.245.5

15.0 110.0

26.9 6.0

46

Page 50: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)~ContinuedAs (Arsenic)

18.0

17.0

16.0

15.0

14.0

13.0

12.0

11.0

t

(

-

-

"

J-S

........... jr_ i _______ f___ I * 1

.. » ___* * ' <3

MtinmrtF^ J^ P+*^ 9 0°°^ "" ' "" o* >T --------------- -d^r:-___-

^_3 -^4 -^6 -^-0-11,

3. AA: graphite furnace 11. AA: hydride 1. ICP Una.AA: hydride NaBH4 MPV= 15.2 5. ICP/MS F-pseudosigma = 1.2

N= 33 8 14 3 8 N= 66 Minimum = 9.6 14.0 14.0 15.0 14.0 Hu= 16.2 Maximum = 20.5 27.4 17.0 112 16.4 Hl= 14.6

Median= 15.0 15.3 15.4 14.9 F-pseudosigma = 1.4 3.2 0.8 1.0

Lab1 37

10 1113 15 16 18 2326 30 32 34 3639 42 46 48 5058 68 69 707375 76 80 81 8687 89 96 97

102105 109 113 118 119127 128 133 134 138141 142 144 145 146

Rating3 3

NR 344

NR4 4 04 3 4 4 00 4 23 30 0 3 4 04 23 344 24 1 34 1 1 0 43 4 2 3 34 4 3 04

Z-value 3 4 6 11 11na Lab Rating Z-value 3 4 6 11 11na0.89 16.2 151 3 -0.89 14.1

-0.72 14.3 180 NR < 37.1 <120 190 4 0.21 15.4

0.72 16.0 191 1 1.56 17.0 -0.13 15.0 193 1 -1.81 13.00.30 15.5 196 4 0.30 15.5

<100 204 4 -0.04 15.1 0.21 15.4 212 3 0.72 16.0

-0.46 14.6 213 2 -1.05 13.9 4.51 20.5 215 4 -0.13 15.0

-0.21 14.9 217 4 0.46 15.7 -0.97 14.0 220 4 -0.46 14.6 -0.21 14.9 221 4 -0.38 14.7 0.38 15.6 224 4 0.30 15.5

-3.50 11.0 234 1 1.73 17.22.57 18.2 236 NR <35

-0.13 15.0 241 3 -0.63 14.4 -1.39 13.5 249 0 3.33 19.1 -0.80 14.2 255 4 -0.46 14.6 -0.97 14.0 265 2 1.26 16.73.25 19.0

-4.72 9.6 0.89 16.2 0.13 15.3 5.78 22.0

-0.46 14.6 1.14 16.5 0.97 16.3 0.72 16.0 0.13 15.3

-0.21 14.9 1.05 16.4

-0.46 14.6 1.56 17.0 0.55 15.80.13 15.3

-1.73 13.1 1.98 17.5 2.32 17.9

-0.13 15.0-0.63 14.4 -0.30 14.8 1.14 16.5

-1.00 14.0 -0.97 14.0-0.13 15.0 0.04 15.2

-0.55 14.5 10.33 27.4 -0.04 15.1

47

Page 51: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported date for standard reference water sample T-1 43 (trace constituents)~ContinuedB (Boron)

22az

4. ICP 6. ICP/MS2232.. Color azomethine

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Medial =F-pseudosigma =

3022.7

140.035.2

5.2

428.836.0

195.0

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu = Hl =

35.05.235

37.030.0

Lab Rating Z-value 22az1 3

11 15 1618 24 26 28 4246 48 68 70 8586

119 127 128 129132 134 138 141 142145 158 180 191 212215 217 219 234 235236 240 255 265 273

4 3 4

NR0

NR 3 1 2 40

NR 0

NR 443 4 3 01 4 2 0 44 3 4 4

NR0 2 4 4 32 24 4 0

-0.02 -0.97 0.39

4.29

-0.83 -1.73 1.40 0.19

-2.39

20.38

0.120.37

-0.58 0.14

-0.97 11.65-1.65 0.15

-1.20 -2.12 0.140.08 0.58

-0.50 -0.19

13.78 1.01 0.00

-0.35 -0.97-1.13 -1.36 0.19

-0.07 4.46

34.9 30.0 37.0 <50 57.1<50 30.7 26.1 42.2

36.022.7

<100 140.0 <50 35.636.9 32.0 35.7 30.0

95.026.5 35.8

28.8 24.1 35.735.4 38.0 32.4

34.0 <50

106.0 40.2 35.0 33.2 30.029.2 28.0 36.0

34.7 58.0

48

Page 52: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constftuents)-ContinuedBa (Barium)

2. AA: direct nitrous oxide 3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudoskjma =

5. DCP 6. ICP/MS

1 890.0 69.6

98.190.414.5

45 164.5 102.094.081.5

3.7

1341.092.079.1

3.9Lab Rating Z-value

134 7

1113 15 16 18 192425 26 28 303233 36 39 4046 4850 55 6870 75 81 83 8586 87 89 96 97102 105 107 113 119121 127 128 133 134138 141 142 145 146

43 2 4 42 3 4 3 43 3 4 3 43 0 1 3 33 0 1344 4 3 3441 0 NR 00 2 2 4 44 20 3 3434 1 4

0.08 0.55 1.13 0.38 -0.201.37 -0.88 0.07 -0.64 0.07-0.69 0.55 -0.22 0.71 -0.42-0.88 4.45 1.79 90.0 -0.62 -0.840.69 3.52 1.79 -0.82 0.240.09 -0.15 -0.86 -0.91 0.29-0.09 1.95 3.58

<100 -2.722.68 -1.26 -1.08 -0.38 0.46-0.20 -1.35 -2.61 -0.93 -0.67-0.31 0.64 -0.02 1.99 0.07

84.4 87.0 83.681.088.1 77.9

79.0 82.278.8 84.4 80.9 85.1 80.0

102.0

78.185.0

97.8 90.0

78.2 83.082.3 81.2

77.8 83.281.5

90.7 98.1

69.694.0

77.0 80.2 84.081.0 75.8

77.7 78.980.5 84.8

90.9 82.2

82.2

82.2

77.9

79.1

78.0

76.2

70.1

81.8

F-pseudosigma =

Hu = Hl =

81.94.568

84.678.5

Lab Rating Z-value151158180191196204212215217219224234235236240241 0255 4259 1265 2

0.510.02

-0.64-9.04 0.071.26 2.23 0.02 0.11

-0.42-3.85 0.46 1.35

-0.51-2.192.30

-0.31-1.75-1.08

82.079.0

84.2

41.082.2

87.6

82.082.480.0

92.0

64.584.088.079.672.0

92.3

74.080.5

77.0

49

Page 53: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)~ContinuedBe (Berlyium) jig/L

1. AA: direct air3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudos)gma =

6. ICP/WS

1 10 3710.00 6.70 6.53

10.00 1Z608.44 8.501.66 0.47

137.009.808.700.88

Lab Rating Z-value

MPV =F-pseudoskjma =

N =Hu =Hl =

8.500.66

618.898.00

1 3 47

1113 15 16 18 2526 30 32 36 3940 46 48 68 6970 75 76 81 8385 86 89 96 97102 105 113 119 121127 128 133 134 138141 142 144 145 146151 158 180 191 193

3 3 3 3 44 4 2 4 04 1 2 0 13 4 0 3 14 4 1 0 424 10 33 1 4 2 30 24 4 43 3 01 13 2 4 3 3

-0.56 -0.76 0.76 -0.61 -0.150.36 0.15 -1.21 0.00 2.120.24 -1.82 1.36 2.27 10.00 1.52 9.50

-0.91 0.39 2.27 10.00 0.61 -1.79 7.320.26 0.00 1.79 -2.27 -0.451.02 -0.38 -1.67 7.40 2.27 10.00 0.74 8.99-0.76 -1.82 0.42 -1.18 7.72 -0.76-2.99 -1.46 0.30 0.02 0.23-0.53 0.56

-12.86 <0.01 1.52 -1.92-0.52 1.21 0.15 0.59 -0.76 8.00

8.00 9.00 8.10 8.408.74 8.60

8.509.908.66 7.30

7.90 8.76

8.90

8.67 8.50

8.209.17 8.25

8.00

8.78

8.006.53

8.70 8.51 8.658.15

9.50 7.23

9.30 8.60

8.13

7.70

9.40

9.687.00

7.30

7.54

8.87

8.16

8.89

Lab Rating Z-value196212213215217

0.531.970.56

-0.61-0.15

8.859.80

8.878.108.40

224 0234 4235 3236 3241 0

6.21-0.18-0.76-0.91-2.73

12.608.388.007.90

6.70255265

-0.35 0.30

8.278.70

50

Page 54: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituentsj-ContinuedCa (Calcium) mg/L

59.0

57.0

55.0

53.0

51.0

49.0

47.0

(

-

= -; "|J

f. . -^HxofrTpfTf

* 'IT ~

). Other . AA: direct air

1. AA: direct nitrous oxide N =

Minimum = Maximum =

Median = F-pseudosigma =

Lab Rating Z-value1 4 -0.50 3 4 0.34 4 4 -0.11 7 3 0.97

11 2 1.1913 0 2.41 15 2 -1.37 16 4 0.16 18 4 -0.09 19 4 -0.0223 3 -0.52 24 4 -0.11 25 3 0.52 26 4 0.07 28 3 0.7930 4 0.16 32 3 0.61 33 4 0.25 36 3 -0.74 42 2 1.3743 4 0.16 46 2 1.06 48 2 1.01 55 3 0.56 68 2 1.2869 3 -0.56 70 3 0.79 75 4 -0.16 81 4 -0.29 83 4 -0.2585 3 0.79 86 3 0.83 87 2 -1.06 89 4 -0.47 97 3 -0.83

102 1 1.96 105 4 -0.38 107 3 -0.74 109 4 -0.47 110 3 0.61113 1 1.91 114 0 -4.34 119 4 0.02 121 3 -0.65 128 3 0.92129 1 1.96 132 4 -0.12 133 4 -0.29 134 4 0.38 138 3 0.56

1-1~J~ -------

rJ_0___-____ _____________

^7 ^00/000^°*''f**^ jtff

m 0 D 1 O

4. ICP 6. ICP/MS 20. Titrate: colorimetric

3 16 7 53 3 4 48.3 44.8 44.0 32.7 53.0 0.0 54.2 58.0 54.0 59.1 55.0 57.1

52.9 51.8 54.4 2.1 0.6 2.0

0 1 2 4 6 2052.5 54.4 53.4 55.8 56.359.0 50.6 54.0 53.5 53.6

52.5 53.4 54.8 53.8 55.4

54.0 55.0

54.2 52.0

56.754.0 56.0 55.9 54.9 56.5

52.4 55.4

53.3 53.0

53.155.4

55.5 51.3

52.6 51.8

58.0 52.8

52.0 52.6 55.0

57.9 44.0

53.7 52.2 55.7

58.0 53.4 53.0 54.5 54.9

«?*<JV

^t******^ T-"^^^^^^^ f -I-000000**** Tf "-

, _^« _«_._,_»

MPV= 53.7 F-pseudosigma = 2.2

N= 86 Hu = 55.4 HI = 52.4

Lab Rating Z-value 01246140 4 0.38 54.5 141 2 1.15 56.2 142 4 -0.17 53.3 145 0 2.45 59.1 146 1 -1.64 50.0158 4 0.47 54.7 180 4 0.34 54.4 190 4 -0.16 53.3 191 4 -0.25 53.1 193 3 -0.83 51.8203 0 -2.64 47.8 204 4 -0.20 53.2 212 2 1.28 56.5 215 3 0.74 55.3 217 1 -1.55 50.2218 3 -0.74 52.0 219 1 -1.64 50.0 220 3 0.61 55.0 221 3 0.65 55.1 224 2 -1.06 51.3234 3 0.83 55.5 235 0 2.41 59.0 236 4 -0.50 52.5 240 0 -2.72 47.6 241 0 -3.98 44.8246 0 -9.44 32.7 255 4 -0.38 52.8 257 2 -1.19 51.0 261 1 1.55 265 4 0.20 54.1268 4 -0.18 53.3 270 0 -2.39 48.3 271 4 0.12 272 0 -13.49 273 2 1.48 56.9274 0 -24.12

I

20

57.1

53.9 23.7

0.0

51

Page 55: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143(trace constituents)~ContinuedCd (Cadmium)

22.5

21.5

20.5

19.5

18.5

17.5

16.5

15.5

14.5

HP:-"cP-a

^*^f....... Jt

. . A^k

-? -fJ-A$4*^X*^

| f~ f****^

'\+ /

I. AA: direct air 3. AA: graphite furnace I. ICP

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab Rating Z-value

1 3 47

1113 15 16 18 1923 24 25 26 2830 32 36 39 4042 46 48 58 6869 70 73 75 8081 83 85 86 8789 96 97

102 105113 114 118 119 121127 128 132 133 134

3 0.65 4 0.27

NR 2 1.28 4 -0.072 -1.15 0 -2.77 4 0.40 4 -0.27 4 0.474 -0.20 3 -0.94 2 1.28 3 0.88 0 -3.714 0.27 4 -0.34 4 -0.07 3 -0.74 4 -0.343 -0.74 4 -0.34 3 -0.74 3 0.61 4 0.273 0.61 3 -0.61 4 -0.07 4 0.07 0 -3.513 0.61 4 -0.40 4 0.34 3 -0.94 2 1.283 0.81 2 -1.08 4 0.13 2 1.28 4 0.404 0.00 4 -0.07 0 -8.57 4 -0.47 3 -0.742 -1.15 4 0.27 4 -0.40 3 0.54 4 -0.20

6. ICP/MS

6 28 13.9 6.4 26.0 21.4

19.2 1.7

1 320.1

15.0

18.8

20.4

19.0 18.0

18.6 18.0 20.0

20.0 18.2

13.920.0

19.6

21.020.3 17.5 19.3

19.0 6.4

18.4

-D-.-.-

35 12 13.6 18.0 22.3 23.0 19.0 19.6

1.3 0.84 6

19.5 <100

21.0 19.017.4

19.7 18.7 19.8

17.7 21.0

13.619.5

18.6

18.618.0

19.5

19.0 19.2

18.5

17.7

21.0 19.7

19.1

18.017.4

19.5 18.5 19.9 18.8

MPV = F-pseudosigma =

Hu = Hl =

Lab Rating Z-value 1 3138 4 -0.07 140 3 0.61 20.0 141 4 o.47 142 3 0.61 145 0 2.16146 4 -0.34 151 4 0.34 158 0 -6.95 8.8 180 4 0.34 190 2 1.08 20.7191 4 -0.34 193 3 0.61 20.0 196 4 0.07 212 0 2.63 213 1 1.55 21.4215 4 -0.07 217 2 -1.35 219 3 -0.74 221 4 0.34 19.6 224 0 -3.51234 4 0.40 19.7 235 3 0.61 236 2 -1.42 241 3 0.81 20.3 249 0 -2.09 16.0255 4 0.32 256 3 0.88 20.4 257 0 4.65 26.0 259 0 -3.44 14.0 265 3 0.61273 0 -2.09 274 0 -7.88 7.4

19.1 1.5 81

20.0 18.0

4 619.0

19.8 20.0

22.318.6

19.6

19.6

18.6

19.2 23.0

19.0 17.1 18.0

13.9

20.0 17.0

19.6

20.016.0

52

Page 56: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)-ContinuedCo (Cobalt)

21.0

1. AA: direct air3. AA; graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

1 923.0 10.0

18.717.3

1.1

328.0

24.216.8

1.3

1115.120.017.0

1.0Lab Rating Z-value

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =Hl =

17.01.253

17.616.0

13 47

1113 15 16 18 2426 30 32 40 4246 48 50 68 7075 86 89 97

102105 119 121 127 128132 134 138 141 142145 146 158 180 191196 212 213 215 217219 221 224 234 235

4 1 NR0 30 NR 4303 4 4104 NR 3 3 NR1 4 3 4 023 3 4 44 4 1 3 30 3 4 4 34 4 2 1 43 3 3 4 1

0.36 -1.69

2.450.84-3.71

-0.08 -0.76 -3.96-0.51 0.00 0.17 -1.52 2.530.34

-0.84 0.84

1.60 -0.17 0.67 0.17 2.53-1.26 -0.93 -0.840.25 0.000.00 -0.25 -1.60 -0.67 -0.596.07 -0.67 0.08 0.25 0.510.25 0.00 1.43 1.69 -0.17-0.84 -0.84 -0.93 0.34 1.69

17.4 15.0

<100 19.9 18.012.6 <20

16.1 12.316.4 17.0

15.2

17.4 <50

16.0 18.0 <5018.9 16.8

17.817.2

20.0

16.0 17.3

17.017.0 16.7

16.2

24.2 16.2 17.1 17.3

18.7 19.0 16.816.0

16.0 15.9

17.4 19.0

16.9

17.2

20.0

15.5 15.9

15.1

16.3

17.617.3 17.0

Lab Rating Z-value236240255257259

-2.61-1.69 0.17 5.06-5.90

13.915.017.2

23.010.0

265273

0.63 -7.59

17.88.0

53

Page 57: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituentsj-ContinuedCr (Chromium) jig/L

1. AA: direct air 4. 2. AA direct nitrous oxide 6.3. AA: graphite furnace

N= 1Minimum = 35.0

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

ICP ICP/MS

238.25ZO

2825.647.037.4

3.5

352924Z137.12.0

1332438.435.4

2.1Lab Rating Z-value

MPV = F-pseudosigma =

1347

1113 15 16 18 1923 24 25 26 3032 36 39 40 4246 48 50 58 6869 70 73 75 7681 83 85 86 8789 96 97

102105113 118 119 127 128132133 134 138140

3 3 NR4 43 3 24 43 0 4 4 44 4 0 1 44 1 4 4 34 4 1 4 41 4 3 0 44 3 3 1 14 0 3 3 12 24 3 3

-0.57 0.76

0.42 -0.380.57 -0.72 -1.06 -0.27 0.30-0.76 -2.20 0.00 0.19 0.000.11 0.00 -3.42 -1.71 0.38-0.46 1.82 -0.38 0.00 0.57-0.38 0.04 -1.52 0.04 -0.271.52 0.08 0.53 -2.96 0.46-0.38 0.72 0.76 1.52 -1.560.42 2.96 -0.76 0.84 -1.751.33 -1.03 -0.30 0.65 -0.76

35.0

37.0 28.0

35.8 41.8 36.0 37.0

36.0

41.0

38.236.0 38.9 39.0

44.8 35.0

36.2

35.0

39.0 <100 38.1 36.038.5 35.1

36.3 37.8

31.2 37.0 37.5 37.0

32.5

38.5

37.1 33.0 37.1

37.2 38.4 29.2

41.0

38.1

39.2

40.5 34.3

38.7

35.5

34.2

37.3

38.0

36.3

32.9

32.4

37.02.679

38.635.1

Lab Rating Z-value141 142 145146 151158 180 190 191 193196 204 212 213 215217 219 221 234 235236 241 249 253 255256 257 259 265 273

4 3 1 4 304 3 343 01 0 34 24 1 23 2 1 2 42 0 2 44

-0.11 -0.61 1.94 -0.23 -0.87-4.33 -0.08 0.91 0.53 -0.38-0.95 3.80 -1.52 2.85 -0.760.23-1.14 0.27 1.75 1.14-0.72 -1.14 2.03 1.23 -0.391.14 5.70 -1.14 0.00 0.38

25.6

39.4

36.0

47.0

44.5

37.7 41.6 40.0

34.0 42.4 40.2

40.0 52.0

34.0

36.7

42.136.4

36.8

35.037.6 34.0

35.1

36.0

38.0

3'4

34.7

3f»4

34.5

33.0

37.0

54

Page 58: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)-ContinuedCu (Copper)

1. AA: direct air3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

13 2318.7 4.230.0 24.825.0 21.4

3.4 1.9

427.8

42.022.5

1.7

1219.226.022.2

1.6Lab Rating Z-value

13 47 1011 13 15 16 1819 23 24 25 262830 32 36 4042 46 48 50 5558 68 69 70 7375 80 81 83 8586 87 89 9697

102 105 107 113 114118 119 121 127 128

4 3 4 3 43 0 4 4 40 3 0 3 30 4 4 0 44 4 2 3 3NR 0 4 4 44 4 4 4 14 3 4 3 34 4 2 3 30 1 0 4 1

-0.02 0.90 0.38 0.59 0.280.90 -6.16 -0.50 -0.24 0.02-3.25 0.85 -3.15 -0.66 0.59-7.51 0.12 0.49 -6.36 -0.50-0.14 0.07 -1.33 0.90 -0.76

2.46 -0.45 0.28 -0.14-0.03 -0.14 -0.14 0.38 1.520.43 -0.66 -0.45 0.59 -0.55-0.14 0.07 1.32 0.64 -0.66-7.45 1.94 -2.21 0.07 -1.57

22.2

22.8

16.0 23.9

10.0

22.4 19.7 24.0 20.8

<50

21.4

22.0 22.0

25.2

21.0 21.4

23.4 21.2

24.8

21.07.9

24.0 23.0 23.4

24.0 10.4 21.3

22.3

16.2 21.0 23.47.8

22.5

21.3

27.0

22.8 22.022.2

23.0

23.1

22.0

23.5

26.0 18.0 22.4

21.8

23.2

22.0

22.4

19.2

Lab Rating Z-value

MPV = F-pseudosigma =

Hl =

1 3

22.31.990

23.621.0

129 132 133 134 138140 141 142 144 145146 151 158 180 190191 193 196 203 204212213 215 217 219221 224 234 235 236240 241 249 253 255256 257 259 265 273

0 0 2 4 21 3 2 201 4 1 3 44 1 3 101 4 0 3 14 4 3 2 13 24 0 43 0 2 4 4

4.01 30.0 10.24 -1.43 0.07

-1.121.94 26.0 0.54

-1.18 -1.07 20.2 5.671.52

-0.09 1.83 0.54

-0.03 22.20.02 1.94 26.0 0.74

-1.85 18.7 -5.48 11.71.94 0.49 23.2 4.22 0.85

-1.69-0.50 21.3 -0.40 0.69

-1.18 -1.85-0.66 -1.33 19.7 -0.32 21.7 4.01 30.0

-0.310.69 23.6 2.98 28.0 1.42 25.0 0.38

-0.14

42.0 19.5 22.4

23.3

33.225.2

25.8 23.3

30.4 23.9 19.0

21.5 23.6 20.0 18.721.0

21.7

22.0

20.1

20.0

22.1

22.3

23.7

26.0

23.0

274 -9.37 4.2

55

Page 59: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)~ContinuedFe (Iron) jig/L

1. AA: direct air 3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

5. 6.

DCP ICP/MS

22. Cotorimetric19

170470222

27

9188302233

22

5621

261221

10

1 4250 200

365

4152228

Lab Rating Z-value 22134 7 1011 13 15 16 1819 21 23 24 2526 30 32 33 3536 40 42 43 4648 50 55 586869 70 73 75 8081 83 85 86 8789 91 96 97 102105 107 109 113 114

3 0 3 4 12 2 2 1 44 0 4 4 240 0141 0 4 3 40 0 4 344 3 4 3 44 4 4 3 31 3 1 3131 0 42

-0.77 2.81 0.94 0.20 1.73 246-1.44 -1.08 -1.01 -1.59 0.000.36 -5.05 -0.29 218 0.00 -1.440.00

17.89 470 10.32 2.02 -0.432.02 250

-14.52 0.14 0.58 0.00-4.47 2.09 0.00 -0.87 210 0.220.29 226 -0.58 -0.07 -0.58 0.07 223-0.14 -0.22 0.14 -0.65 -0.72 2121.59 -0.72 1.88 248 0.79 1.59-0.65 -1.59 200 2.48 256 0.07 -1.30 204

211 261 235 225

202 207 208 200 222227

152

222 202222

365 250

216

21 224 230 222160

251 222

225

214221 214

220 219 224 213

244212

233 244213

223

-e x 22

MPV =F-pseudosigma :

N =Hu =Hl =

2221493

230211

Lab Rating Z-value 5 6 22119 121127 128 129132 133 134 138 140141 142 145 146 151155 158 180 190 191203 204 212 213 215217 219 220 221 224234 235 236 240 241249 253 255 256 257265 273 274

4 3 4 204 4 4 4 21 4 4 4 14 4 4 0 44 20 0 43 24 414 3 3 0 00 0 4 4 03 3 3

0.29 -0.87 -0.14 -1.23 -2.670.40 0.07 -0.28 0.14 1.08 237-1.59 -0.07 -0.42 -0.14 -1.590.46 0.00 0.00 -2.16 192 -0.07-0.14 220 -1.01 2.74 5.77 0.140.58 -1.01 0.02 222 -0.14 -1.510.14 0.94 -0.53 -2.74 3.03-2.45 7.79 330 -0.35 -0.07 221 -3.75 1700.58 0.58 0.73

226 210 220 205

185228 223 218 224

200 221 216 220

200228

222 222

221

206 260

302 224230 208

220201224 235 215 184

264188

217

230 230

232

56

Page 60: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 43 (trace constituents)-ContinuedK (Potassium) mg/L

3.00

2.80

760

2.40

2.20

2.00

A Oft

i

,

ft? ^f

i-i-ft"^^ .£fi4j&i^-^T^^OJ~^ A/wwwV^^ ^

jrrtEP"^^ A/s/yyy^O^^^^^^^rfo*^ ^ooooo^^ ------- I] <!?i'J

^_ 1 ^.4 ^.^._A.7 ^12. AA: direct air 6. ICP/MS

\. ICP 7. Ion chromatography MPV = 5. DCP 12. Flame emission F-pseudosigma =

N= 26 41 1 3 2 11 N = Minimum = 1.80 2.11 2.54 2.37 2.49 2.35 Hu =

Maximum = 3.00 5.40 2.50 2.50 3.52 Hl = Median = 2.54 2.50 2.78

F-pseudosigma = 0.16 0.19 0.27Lab Rating Z-value 1 4 5 6 7 12 Lab Rating Z-value 1 4

1 4 0.23 2.55 142 2 -1.30 2.22 3 0 13.49 5.40 145 3 0.74 2.66 71 1.60 2.84 146 1 2.00 2.93

11 4 0.00 2.50 180 3 -0.84 2.32 13 3 -0.56 2.38 190 4 0.0015 2 -1.02 2.28 191 4 -0.14 16 1 -1.86 2.10 193 3 -0.84 2.32 18 4 -0.47 2.40 203 1 1.77 2.88 19 4 0.00 2.50 204 4 -0.47 23 4 -0.28 2.44 212 4 -0.47 2.4024 3 -0.74 2.34 215 0 2.79 3.10 25 3 0.65 2.64 217 1 1.95 2.92 26 4 -0.05 2.49 218 3 -0.70 2.35 28 3 -0.84 2.32 219 4 0.00 2.50 32 4 0.00 2.50 220 4 0.47 2.6033 4 0.19 2.54 221 3 0.51 2.61 36 0 -3.26 1.80 224 3 -0.88 2.31 40 3 -0.84 2.32 234 4 -0.23 2.45 42 4 0.00 2.50 235 0 5.12 3.60 43 3 -0.93 2.30 236 1 -1.67 2.1446 3 0.56 2.62 241 4 0.19 2.54 48 4 0.05 2.51 246 0 -10.95 < 0.2 51 4 -0.09 2.48 249 3 0.84 64 4 0.33 2.57 255 3 -0.56 2.38 68 2 1.40 2.80 256 0 4.7469 2 1.02 2.72 257 1 1.86 70 4 -0.33 2.43 259 3 0.93 2.70 81 3 -0.60 2.37 261 3 -0.70 83 4 0.00 2.50 265 4 -0.19 2.46 85 2 1.49 2.82 268 3 0.93 2.7086 4 0.37 2.58 270 0 2.56 87 4 -0.37 2.42 271 2 1.40 89 3 -0.70 2.35 272 0 2.33 97 4 0.19 2.54 273 0 2.16 2.97

102 4 0.00 2.50 274 2 1.30105 4 -0.14 2.47 107 3 0.60 2.63 109 4 0.05 2.51 113 4 -0.47 2.40 114 0 2.33 3.00119 0 3.26 3.20 121 4 0.23 2.55 127 3 0.84 2.68 128 1 -1.81 2.11 129 4 -0.47 2.40132 3 0.65 2.64 134 4 -0.09 2.48 138 4 -0.09 2.48 140 4 0.05 2.51 141 4 0.23 2.55

______ -p?r____k .A4A JJ* j£-+ «P - ~ "-

2.50 0.21

84 2.69 2.40

5 6 7 12

2.502.47

2.40

2.68

3.522.90

2.35

3.05 2.80 3.00

2.78

57

Page 61: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace consOtuents)-ContinuedLi (Lithium)

12

1. M: direct air 3. M: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS 12. Rame emission

316.019.4

214.019.2

2013.126.018.02.4

814.521.018.1

1.2

122.2

MPV = F-pseudosigma =

Hu =

18.02.134

19.616.7

Lab Rating Z-vaiue 121 3 47 1624 25 26 30 3240 42 64 68 6975 76 85 105 109127 134 142 145151191 196 212 217 219234 236256 257 259265 273

3 0 NR 3 10 4 4 3 43 0 1 4 33 4 4 2 33 3 4 2 324 4 4 43 0 0 3 14 0

-0.67 3.77

0.66 -1.653.02 0.00 -0.14 -0.94 -0.38-0.61 -5.71 1.98 0.00 0.570.80 0.14 -0.24 17.5 -1.08 0.66 19.4-0.71 0.74 0.47 1.46 -0.521.41 -0.05 0.47 -0.24 -0.470.85 -2.31 -8.52 -0.94 16.0 -1.890.16 2.83

16.6 26.0 <100 19.4

14.524.4 18.0 17.7 16.0

17.216.7 <6

22.2 18.0

19.219.7

18.3

15.7

16.5 19.6 19.0 21.1

16.921.0 17.9 19.0

17.5 17.019.8 13.1

<0.1

14.018.4

24.0

58

Page 62: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 43 (trace constituents)-ContinuedMg (Magnesium) mg/L

0. Other 1. AA: direct air2. AA: direct nitrous oxide

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

4. 6.

ICP ICP/MS

20. Titrate; cotonmetnc2

10.310.4

208.3

11.010.20.6

58.7

10.4

547.6

12.510.50.5

310.310.8

49.0

25.4

Lab Rating Z-value 201 347

1113 15 16 18 1923 24 25 26 2830 32 33 364042 4346 48 5155 68 69 70 7581 83 85 86 8789 97 102 105 107109 110113 114 119121 127 128 129 132

3 4 3 3 23 24 4 44 4 3 3 33 34 0 424 4 3 01 2 3 4 44 3 34 44 4 0 4 34 0 3 343 4 3 34

-0.58 -0.19 0.96 0.85 1.350.58 -1.18 0.19 -0.31 0.19-0.33 -0.19 -0.77 0.96 0.77-0.77 0.77 -0.19 10.3 -3.28 -0.191.35 0.19 0.19 0.77 -3.041.73 1.16 -0.58 0.19 0.39-0.19 -0.58 0.77 0.00 -0.390.00 0.00 4.05 -0.19 0.580.00 -4.09 0.58 -0.77 0.39-0.77 0.00 -0.87 -0.77 0.27

10.2

8.7

8.8

10.1

10.6

10.8

10.210.4 10.4

10.710.4 8.3

10.0

10.1 10.3 10.9 10.8 11.110.7 9.8

10.5 10.2 10.5

10.3 10.0 10.9 10.8

10.0 10.8

10.311.1 10.5 10.5 10.8

11.3 11.0

10.5

10.3 10.1

10.4

12.5 10.3

10.7 10.0

10.610.0 10.4 10.0

10.5

-6 X 20

F-pseudosigma =

Hu = Hl =

10.40.588

10.710.0

Lab Rating Z-value 20133 134 138 140 141142145 146 158 180190 191 193 203 204212 215 217 218 219220 221 224 234 235236 240 241 246 255257 261 265 268 271272 273 274

34 3 2 331 3 2 44 3 24 01 4 3 4 33 2 33 44 4 1 0 40 4 3 4 00 1 0

-0.89 -0.45 0.58 1.16 0.96-0.77 2.00 -0.58 1.35 0.390.00 0.62 -1.25 0.42 -5.401.54 0.39 -0.77 -0.02 -0.77-0.77 -1.27 -0.83 -0.89 0.190.50 -0.39 -1.93 -3.33 -0.19-3.28 0.19 -0.58 -0.39 28.83-2.75 1.60

14.13

9.910.2 10.7

11.0 10.910.0 11.4 10.1 11.1 10.6

10.4 10.7

9.8 10.6

7.611.2 10.6 10.0

10.4 10.0

10.0 9.7

10.0 9.9

10.510.7 10.2

9.4 8.7

10.38.7

10.1 10.2

11.2

10.5

25.49.0

17.7

59

Page 63: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)-ContinuedMn (Manganese)

24.0

1. AA: direct air 3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

5. 6.

DCP ICP/MS

22. Cotorimetric14

17.022.019.7

1.5

107.4

22.719.52.4

4813.028.318.0

1.4

1 1220.0 15.7

21.018.0

1.3

131.5

Lab Rating Z-value 2213 47 1011 13 15 16 1819 23 24 25 2628 30 32 333640 4243 46 4850 55 5868 6970 73 75 80 8183 86 87 899196 97 102 105 107109 113 114 119 121

4 1 4 4 14 3 0 4 34 4 4 1 10 3 4 3 41 2 3 2 320 NR 4 NRNR 4 4 2 34 4 2 4 41 1 3 4 334 3 3 4

-0.19 -1.82 0.42 0.21 1.97 22.0-0.10 -0.78 5.24 0.00 -0.880.31 -0.21 17.8 -0.42 1.97 -1.823.58 -0.62 -0.26 0.93 0.42 19.0-1.97 1.45 0.93 -1.04 0.93 20.01.45 21.0 -2.70

<50 0.16

<20

-0.10 -0.05 -1.50 15.3 -0.62-0.42 -0.10 1.19 20.5

-0.31 17.6 -0.311.97 22.0 1.97 22.0 0.93 -0.36 0.93 20.00.57 19.3 0.21 0.93 20.0 0.93 -0.10

14.7 19.0 18.6

18.0 16.7 28.3

16.518.8

17.4 22.0 14.725.117.0

20.0

14.4

20.0 16.2

13.0

18.5

<20 18.0 18.1

17.4 18.0

17.6

20.0

18.6

20.0 18.0

17.8

18.2

17.7

21.0

17.0

17.5

-6 -X-22

F-pseudosigma =

Hu = Hl =

18.21.986

20.017.4

Lab Rating Z-value 22127 128 129 132 134138 140 141 142 145146 151 158 180 183190 191 196 203 204212 215 217 219 220221 224 234 235 236240 241 244 255 256257 265 273 274

3 2 3 344 3 4 4 24 334 034 4 304 4 4 3 33 4 4 4 34 3 0 444 4 2 0

-0.78 -1.30 0.93 20.0 -0.62 -0.08-0.10 -0.62 17.0 0.00 0.42 1.30

-0.21 -0.88 0.67 -0.05 2.33 22.70.57 19.3 0.42 0.42 0.93 20.0 -2.180.42 -0.05 0.00 -0.62 0.52 19.20.78 19.7 0.42 0.10 -0.10 -0.93-0.10 -0.62 17.0 6.90 -0.12 0.42 19.0-0.10 18.0 0.421.45 -5.60 7.4

16.7 15.7

17.0 18.118.0

18.2 19.0 20.717.8

16.5 19.5 18.1

19.0 19.0

14.019.0

18.1 18.2 17.0

19.0 18.4 18.0 16.418.0

31.5 18.Q

19.0 21.0

60

Page 64: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)~ContinuedMo (Molybdenum)

48.0 --

28.0 "__L_______

-Q-2

2. AA: direct nitrous oxide3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

1 1044.0 12.5

52.034.8

2.5

3011.048.036.35.4

1328.040.236.4

1.8Lab Rating Z-value

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =Hl =

36.14.354

37.832.0

1 34 7

1115 16 18 23 2426 2830 32404246 48 50 5568 70 75 81 8687 97

105 109 119127 128 132 134 138141 142 145 146151180 191 196 212 215217 219 221 224 234

4 0 NR143 4 4 NR 440 44 44 4 4 3 24 NR 2 1 244 3 0 43 204 44 3 2 4 323 44 44 0 4 0 4

-0.40 -2.12

-1.56 0.210.51 0.37 0.21

<100 -0.490.21 -2.16 -0.02 0.07 0.42-0.02 -0.02 0.35 -0.95 -1.420.21

-1.02 -1.88 1.02-0.23 -0.16 0.95 -5.49 -0.23-0.93 -1.12 -2.35 0.21 -0.050.28 0.51 -1.28 0.02 0.581.14 0.84 0.07 0.44 0.210.40 -2.12 -0.16 2.77 -0.42

34.4 27.0 <500 29.4 37.038.3

37.0

34.037.0 26.8 36.0

37.9

36.0 37.6 32.0

30.037.0 <50 31.7

40.535.1 35.4

12.5

32.1 31.3 26.0 37.0

37.3

30.6 36.2

41.0

37.037.8 27.0

35.4 48.0

34.3

37.7

36.4

36.0

28.0

40.2

35.1

35.9

38.3

38.6

39.7 36.4 38.0

Lab Rating Z-value235236240241255

0.67-3.81-5.84 3.70 0.05

52.0

39.019.711.0

36.3257265

1.84 44.0 -0.26 35.0

61

Page 65: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)~ContinuedNa (Sodium) mg/L

1. AA: direct air 4. ICP5. DCP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

6. 7.

ICP/MS Ion chromatography

12. Flame emission23

28.042.533.6

1.2

4929.755.034.2

1.6

1 3 133.7 32.7 34.0

33.2

1118.450.034.04.5

Lab Rating Z-value 121 3 47

1113 15 16 18 1923 24 25 26 2832 33 36 40 4243 46 4851 6468 69 70 75 8183 85 86 87 8997 102 105 107 109110 113 114 119 121127 128 129 132 134

4 0 3 243 2 3 4 44 4 0 4 03 4 0 3 43 2 3 4 44 3 4 4 33 4 3 344 1 1 3 43 0 0 4 24 3 3 4 4

-0.22 13.24 0.60 1.01 -0.090.66 -1.35 -0.72 -0.50 0.22-0.35 -0.41 2.42 0.41 2.11-0.53 -0.16 2.55 -0.66 -0.030.66 1.04 0.79 0.22 -0.090.35 -0.85 0.16 0.35 -0.79-0.66 0.35 0.66 -0.72 -0.220.35 -1.92 -1.98 -0.72 0.09-0.60 -2.67 -3.74 0.16 -1.23-0.47 -0.66 0.66 0.28 -0.14

33.4

38.0

33.8

34.5

32.8 33.634.5

32.8 34.133.0

28.0

35.0

33.7

33.6 55.0 34.9 35.6 33.835.0 31.8 32.8 33.2 34.3

33.3 37.8 34.6 37.3

33.1 33.7

32.9 33.935.0 35.6 35.2

34.3

34.5 32.6

34.2 34.5

32.732.9

35.0

30.9 30.8

29.7

34.2 32.033.2 32.9

34.4

MPVF-pseudosigma

NHuHI

34.01.688

35.032.9

Lab Rating Z-value 12138 140 141 142 145146 180 190 191 193203 204 212 215 217218 219 220 221 224234 235 236 241 246249 255 256 257 259261 265 268 270 271272 273 274

4 0 3 4 13 4 4 4 23 1 1 4 41 3 1 4 13 0 3 1023 1 3 40 3 2 0 40 20

0.09 5.38 42.50.91 0.13 1.960.97 0.03 0.03 -0.47 -1.48 31.6-0.91 32.5 -1.73 1.73 0.35 -0.03-1.86 31.0 -0.60 -1.86 31.0 0.09 34.1 -1.75-0.53 3.18 -0.72 -1.86 31.0 4.451.04 -0.72 -1.75 -0.60 0.03 34.03.93 -0.60 33.0 1.13 35.8 5.21 0.03

10.09 1.39 -9.80

34.1

35.4 34.2 37.135.5 34.0

36.7 34.5 33.9

33.0

31.233.1 39.0 32.8

41.0

32.8

36.2

3*.0 33.2

31.2

35.6

31.2 33.0

40.2

42.2 34.050.0

18.4

62

Page 66: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)-ContinuedNi (Nickel) jig/L

86.0

56.0

1. AA: direct air3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

9 1958.5 30.0

110.0 125.071.0 59.27.4 5.6

3931.886.371.13.7

1450.074.870.82.9

Lab Rating Z-value

MPV = F-pseudosigma =

13 47

111315 16 18 1923 24 26 28 3032 36 39 40 4246 48 50 58 6869 70 73 75 7681 83 85 86 8789 96 97

102 105113 114118 119 121127 128 132 133134

4 0 NR1 423 4 403 3 3 0 44 1 3 0 43 2 0 0 30 4 4 4 30 4 3 2 23 3 4 1 34 4 0 0 44 2 3 3 4

0.02 -2.78

1.69 0.40-1.31 0.85 0.38 0.02 2.720.60 -0.60 0.71 -7.78 -0.200.00 -1.79 -0.99 -3.91 -0.200.63 1.07 -2.98 7.74 110.0 0.60-2.48 58.5 -0.02 0.40 0.02 0.75-4.17 -0.08 0.67 -1.29 1.39 78.0-0.69 -0.67 -0.40 1.79 -0.85-0.08 -0.20 70.0 -8.13 6.55 -0.200.00 -1.27 0.79 0.65 -0.32

75.3

74.0

62.0 66.0

76.4 56.0

67.5 67.6 69.0

30.0 104.0

71.0

69.4

57.0 <200 79.5 73.064.4

71.1 84.7

68.0 74.6 31.8 70.0

51.3

74.2

74.0

70.9 73.0 71.1

70.6 74.4 64.5

80.0

70.6

70.0

75.0 74.3

71.1

72.9

71.0

70.0

74.650.0

66.7

64.6

Hl =

71.05.081

74.467.6

Lab Rating Z-value138 140 141 142 145146 151 158 180 190191 193 196 212 213215 217 219 221 224234 235 236 240 241249 255 256 257 259265 273

4 4 4 3 04 4 3 3 04 3 4 4 04 3 3 4 03 3 2 3 34 4 2 3 04 0

-0.20 0.00 71.0 -0.40 -0.54 3.040.28 -0.40 0.99 0.99 -2.30 59.40.24 -0.99 66.0 -0.10 0.20 4.01 91.20.00 0.61 -0.99 0.04 71.2 -2.200.71 74.6 0.60 -1.09 0.79 -0.67 67.6-0.36 69.2 -0.01 1.11 76.6 -0.60 68.0 10.71 125.00.40 2.18

70.0

69.0

86.372.4

76.0 76.0

71.0 74.1 66.0

59.9

74.0 65.5 75.0

70.9

82.0

68.3

69.0

72.2

70.5 72.0

73.0

63

Page 67: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 43 (trace constituents)-ContinuedPb (Lead)

1. AA: direct air3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

5 40 2472.0 1.2 17.9

155.0 183.0 498.98Z2 85.3

8.3 7.2

1577.1

120.083.3

3.3Lab Rating Z-vatue

MPVF-pseudosigma

NHuHI

83.47.184

89.079.4

1 3 47

1113 15 16 18 1923 24 26 28 3032 34 36 39 4246 48 58 686970 73 75 76 8081 83 85 86 8789 96 97 102 105109 113 114 118 119127 128 132 133 134

4 3 NR 4 43 1 4 4 *

230 4 044 23 4 43 4 20 444 1 4 44 4 3 4 34 24 1 304 1 0 43 44 2 4

0.02 0.73

0.43 0.420.85 1.71 0.46 0.01 1.47-0.72 -3.33 -0.39 -9.23 -0.20-0.30 -1.32 -0.77 -0.34 -0.06-0.91 0.14 1.21

14.03 -0.43-0.17 0.50 1.99 -0.02 0.010.50 0.02 -0.98 -0.34 -0.770.25 1.32 -0.22 1.63 0.63-7.25 -0.33 -1.61 -7.82 -0.200.53 -0.09 -0.41 1.21 -0.01

88.6 <400 86.5 86.4

89.5 95.6

83.5 93.978.3

59.8 80.7 17.9 82.0

74.1 78.0 81.0

77.0 84.4 92.0 183.0 80.482.2

87.0 97.6

83.587.0 83.6

76.5 81.0 78.085.2 92.8 81.9

95.0

32.0 81.1

72.0 27.9 82.0

87.2

80.5 92.0 83.4

83.6

86.7

81.3

83.0

83.3

87.9

82.8

Lab Rating Z-value138140 141 142 145146 151 158 180 190191 193 196 204 212213 215 217 219 220221 224 234 235 236240 241 249 255 256257 259 265 273 274

34 0 4 04 4 0 2 04 34 4 03 4 31 34 0 3 4 00 0 34 020 30 0

-0.89 0.36 2.47 0.50

58.530.11 -0.09 -7.51 1.22 -3.19-0.20 0.64 0.28 -0.17 5.150.92 -0.20 0.94 -1.89 -0.710.15 8.00 0.83 0.50 -2.966.70 2.22-0.60 -0.01 10.081.07 -4.15 -0.55 -2.60

-11.59

86.0 101.0

30.1

60.8

88.0

82.2

90.0

78.484.5

140.3 89.3

99.2 79.2

155.091.0

54.0

1.2

498.984.2

92.1

82.0

70.0

87.0 62.4131.0

83.4

65.0

77.1

87.0

82.8

82.0

85.4

120.0

90.1

79.6

64

Page 68: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)-ContinuedSb (Antimony) jig/L

11na

3. AA: graphite furnace 4. ICP6. ICP/MS

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudoskjma =

Una.AA; hydride NaBH4

198.0

21.215.4

1.5

115.7

49.719.07.5

1315.819.916.70.7

32.0

16.4

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =Hl =

16.61.546

17.215.2

Lab Rating Z-value 11na1 37

11 1315 16 18 26 3032 36 39 40 4246 48 68 697075 81 89 96 97102 105 119 127 128134 138 141 142 146151 180 193 196 212215 217 234 235 236240 241 255 257 265

4 1 0 4 34 4 2 NR 44 0 4 0 44 0 0 200 0 2 2 44 4 3 3 44 4 4 0 NR4 0 2 3 40 3 4 NR 03 20 0 4

-0.47 1.62 9.92 0.13 -0.810.40 0.00 -1.35

0.27-0.40 -4.45 0.07 -7.35 -0.400.40 -2.56 -4.79 -1.08 3.104.25 -7.07 1.42-1.01 0.000.27 0.27 -0.94 -0.67 -0.20-0.15 0.13 -0.13 2.23

0.40 10.12 -1.08 -0.54 -0.40-5.80 0.88 0.27

22.330.94 -1.08 2.54 -9.85 0.13

15.9 19.0 31.3 16.8

15.417.2

16.6 14.6

<20 17.0

16.0 10.0

16.7 5.7

16.017.2 12.8 9.5

15.0 21.2

22.9 <6

18.715.1 16.6

17.0 17.0

15.2 15.6

16.316.4

16.8 16.4

19.9 <20

17.2 31.6

15.0 15.8 16.0

8.0 17.9

17.0 <50 49.718.0

15.0 20.4

2.0 16.8

65

Page 69: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituentsj-ContinuedSe (Selenium)

14.50

-11na

3. AA: graphite furnace 4. ICP6. ICP/MS

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

11na.AA: hydride NaBH4

275.0

31.58.81.5

76.1

174.115.07.2

139.6

12.010.80.8

138.0

19.49.41.3

Lab Rating Z-value 11na137

10 1113 15 16 18 2326 30 32 34 3639 42 46 485058 68 69 70 7375 80 86 87 8996 97

102 105113118 119 127 128 133134 138 141 142 144146 151 180190 191

4 0

NR 402 4 3343 24 4 03 24 244 0 4

NR 04 4 3 0 340 0 4 334 4 3 334 4 3 4

NR 3

NR 0 2

-0.50 -2.82

-0.14 2.42

-1.48 0.47 0.96

-0.87 -0.43-0.64 1.45 0.03

-0.23 -2.820.59 1.45

-0.20 -1.11 -0.320.23

-2.06 -0.05

9.970.03

-0.20 0.78 5.95

-0.990.05

-2.36 5.71 0.41

-0.59-0.93 0.47 0.41 0.53

-0.870.62

-0.03 0.41 0.53

-0.20

0.72

13.32 1.08

8.80 <5

<50

13.607.20

10.40

8.20

12.00

5.00

9.30 7.80

10.00 6.25 9.55 <10

26.00

9.30

9.70 5.75

19.00

8.658.10

10.30

8.20

10.30

9.30<10

<50.1 31.50

9.40

11.20

8.928.57

9.67 9.25

10.60 12.00

9.10

9.67

10.90 19.40 8.00

10.30

10.40

10.50

10.65 9.58

10.50

10.80

11.40

MPV= 9.63F-pseudosigma = 1.64

N= 60Hu = 10.80Hl= 8.59

Lab Rating Z-value 11na193 196 212 215 217220 221 224 234 236240 241 255 259 265

1 3 24 424 0 4 00 1 0 3 2

-1.60 0.72 1.45 -0.32 0.09-1.11 -0.28 -2.15 -0.04

100.173.27 -1.94 -2.62 -0.62 1.36

7.00 10.80 12.00

9.10 9.77

7.80 9.16

6.10 9.56

174.1015.00

6.44 5.33

8.60 11.85

66

Page 70: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 43 (trace constituents)-ContinuedSi02 (Silica) mg/L

28.0

27.0

26.0

25.0

24.0

23.0

22.0

21.0

20.0 19.0

18.0

t

:___________________^L /X>-

- toO+O**

A^o^.AA+OOOO*

?r

^o4**«_ ___/___ .........__._. fj^._

J* ^r*3KvK-*-*A^ x-***'* "

X*

I. AA: direct nitrous oxide I. ICP 5. DCP

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

1 3 4 7

1113 15 24 25 2632 33 42 43 5570 76 81 83 8789 97

104 105 107110 113 118 119 121127 128 129 134 138140 142 145 158 190191 203 204 212 215217 219 234 235 236

Rating Z-value3 -0.72 3 0.60 0 2.10 4 0.26 0 -3.014 -0.26 2 1.29 4 0.43 2 1.23 4 -0.034 0.37 3 -0.66 3 0.83 4 -0.20 4 0.093 -0.55 1 1.58 4 0.14 2 -1.18 4 0.032 -1.23 4 -0.20 4 -0.39 2 -1.23 1 1.692 1.19 4 -0.32 2 1.22 4 -0.20 4 -0.372 -1.12 4 0.37 4 0.20 4 -0.28 2 -1.064 -0.32 1 1.92 1 1.52 3 0.72 4 0.094 -0.03 4 0.21 4 0.03 3 0.55 0 12.941 -1.52 4 -0.20 4 -0.49 2 1.46 0 -5.19

-0-2

6. ICP/MS 22mb. Color: motybdate blue

1 32 1 3 24.7 5.8 22.2 23.3

45.9 26.1 23.0 2.3

245622.1 24.4 27.0 23.8 18.122.9

24.1 25.5 23.3

24.0 22.2

24.8 23.0 23.5

26.1

21.3

21.2

23.0 22.721.4 24.0

22.9

26.7 26.0 24.6

23.3

24.3 45.920.7 23.0 22.5 25.9 14.3

^-^

19 20.6 31.3 23.4

1.422mb

25.6

22.4

23.6

23.421.2 23.0 22.7

26.325.4 22.8 25.5

23.7

21.522.8

23.5

23.7 23.4

5 -*-6 -X 22mb

MPV= 23.4 F-pseudosigma = 1.7

N= 56 Hu= 24.7 Hl= 22.3

Lab Rating Z-value 2456 22mb240 2 -1.35 21.0 241 3 0.77 24.7 246 0 -10.05 5.8 256 1 -1.58 20.6 265 2 -1.26 21.2274 0 4.55 31.3

67

Page 71: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 43 (trace constituents)-ContinuedSr (Strontium)

0. Other 2. AA; direct nitrous oxide3. AA; graphite furnace

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

4. 5.6.

2265613

ICP DCPICP/MS

1 1 34318 255 249

356302

12

1 6308 262

330

Lab Rating Z-value

F-pseudosigma =

Hu =Hl =

3061545

315295

1 3 47

1116 18 24 25 2832 33 40 42 5568 70 81 85 8697 102105 109 113121 127 134 138 142145 151 190 191 196212 217 218 219 234235 236 240 265 273

4 4 2 4 41 2 4 2 34 4 0 4 44 4 0 3 40 0 2 0 34 2 3 3 31 3 0 4 41 3 34 44 3 341

-0.32 0.20 1.14 -0.20 -0.47-1.62 -1.07 0.00 1.21 0.870.34 0.13 -3.83 -0.47 0.000.27 0.20 -2.95 0.81 -0.34-3.42 3.36 -1.41 -2.77 265 -0.74-0.40 -1.41 -0.74 -0.60 0.611.79 0.67

20.60 613 -0.07 0.401.61 -0.74 0.81 0.27 0.270.34 -0.62 -0.81 -0.40 2.01

301 309 323 303 299282 290 306 324319

308 249 299 306310 309

318301

255 356 285

295300 285 295 297315333

295 318

310 310311 297 294 300 336

311

262

316

305 312330

68

Page 72: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)-ContinuedTl (Thallium)

13.5

3. AA: graphite furnace 4. ICP6. ICP/MS

Lab13

1113151618233239424648697076818997

113119128134138141142146151180191193196212213215217234235240241

N =

Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

Rating Z-value4 0.39

NR0 3.854 -0.191 -1.954 0.164 -0.290 -5.004 -0.403 0.770 -5.003 0.871 -2.023 0.960 -2.120 -2.540 41.43

NR3 0.874 -0.404 0.104 0.004 0.163 -0.59

NR4 0.39

NR4 0.29

NR4 -0.100 -2.894 0.104 0.003 -0.930 -3.003 0.870 -2.350 -4.873 -0.964 0.48

16 25.0 9.0

11.0 14.09.61.9

3 410.4

<1014.0

9.88.0

9.7<5

10.97.9

11.07.8

<1010.99.6

10.2

<50

<10

<32.1

7.0

9.0<7

7.65.0

9.010.5

157.4

53.010.10.5

6

10.2

9.610.8<5

7.453.0

10.110.0

9.4

10.4

10.3

9.9

10.110.0

10.9

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =Hl =

10.01.033

10.49.0

265 -1.06 8.9

69

Page 73: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)-ContinuedU (Uranium) p.g/L

4. ICP 6. ICP/MS0. Other

Lab17

163075

119142196212217265

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =Rating Z-value

2 -1.34NR4 0.002 -1.12

NR4 0.004 0.223 -0.560 2.252 1.122 -1.12

111.0

4

<120

11.0<100

810.814.012.0

1.06

10.8

12.0

12.012.211.514.013.011.0

MPVF-pseudosigma

NHuHi

12.00.9

912.211.0

70

Page 74: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143 (trace constituents)-ContinuedV (Vanadium)

2. M: direct nitrous oxide3. M: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

1 693.0 22.0

34.9

3620.839.730.0

2.5

1119.032.230.0

1.3Lab Rating Z-value

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =Hl =

30.03.054

32.028.0

13 47

1113 15 16 18 2425 26 28 30 3240 42 46 48 5055 68 70 75 8185 86 89 97 102105 119 121 127 128134 138 141 142 145146 158 180 191 196212 217 219 224 234

4 0 NR 3 40 0 4 310 4 4 443 3 3 3 03 2 NR 4 04 4 3 1 24 3 3 4 34 4 4 404 4 4 3 43 4 3 1 3

0.37 -2.36

0.81 0.003.27 -3.10 0.10 -0.67 -2.02-2.36 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.17-0.78 0.67 0.74 -0.78 -2.70-0.57 -1.35

-0.13 -3.710.13 0.44 0.78 1.65 1.01-0.20 -0.67 0.67 0.37 -0.78-0.11 -0.17 0.27 -0.13 2.460.00 0.20 0.24 0.74 -0.030.67 -0.47 '

-0.67 1.52 -0.81

31.1 23.0 <50 32.4 30.039.7 20.8

28.0 24.023.0 30.0 30.2 30.0

27.7

32.2 27.7 22.0

28.3 26.0<50 29.6

30.4 31.3

32.3 34.9

33.0

32.0 31.1

27.729.7 29.5 30.8

37.330.0 30.6 30.7

28.6 28.0 34.5 27.6

30.3

30.5

32.0

19.0

29.4 28.0

29.6

32.2 29.932.0

Lab Rating Z-value235 1 2.02236 4 0.37241 1 1.59255 4 -0.10257 0 21.25

34.7

36.031.1

29.793.0

265 0.00 30.0

71

Page 75: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 12. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-143(trace constituents)~ContinuedZn (Zinc)

25.0

23.0

21.0

19.0

17.0

15.0

13.0

! .

/

. _ _ _ ^P*_rrtJ

J

__________________ J* r*CL B ,>0000^>~>~V>'m * A4^^^'

;'/_----- -P

/>*ti

-D-.-B-

. AA- direct air 6. ICP/MS 3. AA: gn^jhite furnace .. ICP

N= 15 7 40 13 Minimum = 15.5 5.8 13.8 15.7 Maximum = 50.0 184.0 44.0 22.0

Median = 21.3 19.5 19.6 19.3 F-pseudosigma = 2.8 16.6 1.7 0.9

Lab1 3 47

1011 13 15 16 1819 23 24 26 2830 32 36 40 4248 58 68 69 7073 75 80 81 8386 87 89 96 97

102105 113 114 118119 121 127 128 132133 134 138 140 141

Rating Z-value 13 -0.57 2 -1.30

NR 4 -0.40 4 0.45 21.01 -1.80 4 0.04 3 -0.81 4 -0.22

NR4 0.49

NR <20 3 -0.94 4 0.04 1 -1.574 0.00 4 -0.04 3 0.90 22.0 0 -2.79 4 -0.450 -6.82

NR <50 3 0.67

NR <50 4 0.044 0.00 4 -0.36 1 -2.02 15.5 2 -1.35 3 -0.76

3 4 618.7

17.1 <200

19.1

16.0 20.1 18.2

19.5 <100

21.1

17.9 20.1 16.520.0

19.9

13.8 19.0

<5

21.5

20.120.0 19.2

17.0 18.3

4 0.22 20.5 1 1.80 24.0 0 9.31 40.7 3 0.90 22.0 0 -2.43 14.64 0.00 4 -0.31 4 -0.27 3 -0.90 18.0 1 1.80 24.00 10.79 4 0.00 1 -1.66 4 0.09 4 0.004 0.22 4 0.19 2 -1.21 4 0.00 20.0 4 -0.13

20.0 19.3

19.4

44.0 20.0 16.3 20.2 20.020.5 20.4

17.3

19.7

MPV= 20.0F-pseudosigma = 22

N= 75 Hu= 21.0 Hl= 18.0

Lab Rating Z-value 1346142 1 -1.93 15.7 145 0 2.29 25.1 146 NR < 20 151 4 0.09 20.2 158 3 -0.63 18.6180 4 0.18 20.4 190 3 0.58 21.3 191 3 -0.54 18.8 193 NR < 50 196 4 -0.09 19.8204 3 -0.90 18.0 212 3 0.90 22.0 213 0 4.18 29.3 215 4 0.00 20.0 217 3 -0.94 17.9219 2 -1.35 17.0 220 4 0.00 20.0 221 0 6.66 34.8 224 4 -0.45 19.0 234 0 -2.07 15.4235 4 -0.22 19.5 236 1 -2.02 15.5 240 2 1.35 23.0 241 1 -1.80 16.0 249 0 73.75 184.0253 0 13.49 50.0 255 3 -0.54 18.8 256 4 0.18 20.4 257 4 0.45 21.0 259 0 13.49 50.0265 3 0.90 22.0 273 0 -2.25 15.0 274 0 -6.37 5.8

72

Page 76: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)

Definition of analytical methods, abbreviations, and symbols_______________________________________

Analytical methods

0. Other/Not reported

1. AA: direct, air

2. AA: direct, N2O3. AA: graphite furnace

4. ICP

5. DCP

6. ICP/MS10. AA: extraction

11. AA: hydride

12. Flame emission

22. Color.

atomic absorption: direct.air

atomic absorption: direct.nttrous oxide

atomic absorption: graphite furnace

inductively coupled plasma

direct current plasma

inductively coupled plasma/mass spectrometry

atomic absorption: extraction [chelating agent(s) specified]

atomic absorption: hydride [reducing agent specified]

flame emission

colorimetric [color reagent specified]

Abbreviations and symbols

ConstituentAg Silver

Al Aluminium

As Arsenic

B Boron

Ba Barium

Be BerylliumCa Calcium

Cd Cadmium

Co Cobalt

Cr Chromium

Cu Copper

Fe Iron

K Potassium

Li Lithium

N = number of samples

MPV = most probable value

F-pseudosigma = nonparametric statistic deviationHu = upper hinge value

HI = lower hinge value

ng/L = micrograms per liter

mg/L = milligrams per liter

Lab = laboratory code number

NR = not rated, less than value reported

< = less than

page Constituent74 Mg Magnesium

75 Mn Manganese

76 Mo Molybdenum

77 Na Sodium

78 Ni Nickel

79 Pb Lead80 Sb Antimony

81 Se Selenium

82 SiO2 Silica

83 Sr Strontium

84 Tl Thallium

85 U Uranium

86 V Vanadium87 Zn Zinc

page88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

73

Page 77: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 45 (trace constituents)-ContinuedAg (Silver)

..--..- ...-..._.__. ̂ ._._,__.....

/

1. AA: direct air3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =Maximum^

Median =F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

4 26 178.20 5.26 4.70

15.00 10.50 52.007.38 7.930.66 1.56

146.607.717.500.57

Lab Rating Z-value

MPV =F-pseudoskjma =

N =Hu =Hl =

7.550.92

618.136.89

1 3 457

11 13 15 16 1623 26 30 32 3642 46 48 58 5968 69 70 75 8587 89 96 97

102105 107 113 114 118119 128 133 134 138141 142 146 149 151180 190 193 196 212

4 1 4 204 3 NR 4 34 4 4 4 04 4 4 1 40 3 NR 1 30 4 3 3 03 4 3 NR 33 4 1 3 30 2 NR 4 42 21 4 3

0.00 -1.69 0.49 -1.09 2.560.49 0.63

0.05 0.920.26 0.23 0.05 -0.16 8.10 15.00-0.05 -0.49 0.05 1.580.052.77 -0.63

-1.56 0.71 8.205.93 13.00 0.05 0.71 -0.99 48.36-0.84 -0.16 -0.82

<10 -0.71-0.71 -0.05 -1.58 -0.72 -0.525.17 -1.03

0.05 0.10-1.36 1.34 -1.69 0.17 -0.82

6.55

7.79 7.76

7.10 7.60 9.00

10.10 6.97 <10

7.60 8.20 6.64

7.40 6.80

6.906.90

7.60

8.78 6.00

6.00 8.00

9.908.00 8.13 <10

8.40

7.60

6.12

52.00

6.10 6.89

12.30

<10

6.30

7.55

7.60

7.40

7.50

7.60

6.78

7.50

7.07

6.60

7.64

7.71 6.80

Lab Rating Z-value213 4 -0.11215 0 2.67217 3 -0.78221 4 -0.21234 4 -0.23235 3236 0241 3245 1249 0

7.4510.00

7.367.34

6.83

-0.60-3.10-0.71-1.88-2.49

7.004.70

6.905.825.26

255 4 0.41 7.93257 0 5.93 13.00259 0 3.21 10.50265 4 0.11273 0 11.37 18.00

7.65

74

Page 78: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedAl (Aluminum) jig/L

94.0 --

84.0 --

74.0 -- ~

64.0 --

54.0 -- 16

44.0 --

Til n

1. AA: direct air 2 AA: direct nitroi 3. AA: graphite fu

1

F-psetLab Rating

1 3 3 0 4 4 5 3 7 2

11 3 13 2 15 2 16 3 18 NR23 NR 26 4 28 0 32 4 33 036 0 40 3 42 4 46 1 48 158 0 59 3 68 0 69 1 70 NR73 3 75 4 76 4 81 1 83 385 NR 89 4 97 4

102 4 105 4107 4 113 4 118 NR 119 3 128 4132 4 134 4 138 4 141 NR 142 4145 0 146 NR 149 3 151 4 158 4

- ?p$ tt

j-gfl j***^

m*F -^oooo^^~ Ii+*~~+*^ . ^TT--- ______ >. AA<> ___ A***^^ ^^0~ . - ^L.._-________._

</-fl-,-0^-B-,-*-4-^.+-.

4. ICP s oxide 5. DCP MPV= 67.6 mace 6. ICP/MS F-pseudosigma = 11.0

N= 1 2 13 31 1 16 N= 64 Minimum = 117.0 50.0 49.2 37.5 100.0 51.0 Hu= 76.1 Maximum = 300.0 79.8 157.0 74.4 Hl= 61.3

Median = 64.8 70.1 66.8 [ jdosigma= 9.4 16.2 4.1

Z-value 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lab Rating Z-value 12345 6-0.69 60.1 180 NR <40.6 2.77 98.0 190 3 -0.54 61.7 0.04 68.0 191 4 0.04 68.0 0.60 74.2 196 4 -0.04 67.2 1.48 83.8 203 3 -0.61 60.9

-0.69 60.0 204 2 1.08 79.4 1.11 79.8 212 3 0.58 74.0 1.32 82.1 215 0 5.41 127.0

-0.77 59.1 217 2 1.30 81.9 <100 219 4 0.04 68.0

<50 221 4 0.08 68.5 -0.16 65.8 224 2 -1.16 54.9 -2.74 37.5 234 4 -0.05 67.0 0.14 69.1 235 2 -1.42 52.0 2.95 100.0 236 4 0.33 71.2

21.18 300.0 240 0 4.32 115.0 -0.80 58.8 241 2 -1.20 54.4 -0.05 67.0 249 3 0.93 77.8 1.75 86.8 255 3 -0.87 58.1

-1.68 49.2 257 1 -1.60 50.04.50 117.0 265 4 -0.06 66.9 0.62 74.4 273 0 8.15 157.0 2.82 98.5

-1.60 50.0 <100

-0.51 62.0 -0.04 67.2 -0.08 66.7 -1.51 51.0 -0.97 57.0

<100 -0.27 64.6 0.46 72.7 0.13 69.0

-0.15 66.0-0.24 65.0 0.05 68.1

<2000 -0.51 62.0 0.31 71.00.49 73.0 0.37 71.7

-0.27 64.6 <100

-0.12 66.33.61 107.2

<200 -0.69 60.0 -0.32 64.1 0.36 71.5

75

Page 79: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 45 (trace constituents)-ContinuedAs (Arsenic) jxg/L

3. AA: graphite furnace 4. ICP6. ICP/MS

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

11naAA- hydride NaBH4

326.90

12.809.881.22

106.10

42.7011.503.34

159.14

11.209.950.66

99.00

10.009.440.41

Lab Rating Z-value 11na134 57

10 11 13 15 1618 23 26 30 3234 36 42 46 4858 59 68 697073 75 76 80 8186 87 89 96 97

102 105109 113 118119 128 133 134 138141 142 144 145 146

4 4 0 4

NR4 4 3

NR43 04 3 44 1 2 3 41 4 0 4

NR0 4 3 3 44 4 34 40 4 2 1 33 4 0 3424 4 0 0

0.02 0.12 3.01

-0.02

0.12 0.12 0.60

0.50-0.66 2.81

-0.25 -0.85 -0.11-0.27 -1.81 1.08

-0.75 -0.082.04 0.12

-2.87 0.31

3.01 -0.42 0.69 0.69 0.120.07

-0.46 -0.85 -0.170.50

-3.64 0.40

-1.33 1.56 0.69

-0.85 0.07

-2.49 -0.78 -0.36-1.19 -0.26 -0.27 9.08 3.49

9.90 10.00 13.00

9.86 <120

10.00 10.50

<100 10.40

9.20 12.80

9.00 9.77

8.00 11.00

9.10 9.80

12.00 10.00

6.90 10.20 <10

13.00

10.60 10.60 10.00

9.70 10.40

6.10 10.30

8.50 11.50 10.60

9.95 7.30

9.518.65

9.61 9.60

19.30 13.50

10.00

9.62

9.60

9.44

9.95 9.40 9.00

9.00

9.07

11na

MPV = F-pseudosigma =

9.88 1.04

66Hu= 10.60 Hl= 9.20

Lab Rating Z-value 11na151 190 191 193 196204 212 213 215 217220 221 224 234 236241 249 255 265

3 2 2142 4 2 2 34 3 1 3 00 2 4 2

-0.57 1.27 1.27

-1.81 -0.031.46 -0.27 -1.23 1.08

-0.71-0.37 -0.55 -1.72 0.98

31.62-2.39 1.08 0.12 1.08

11.20

8.00

11.40

8.60 11.00

9.50 9.31

8.10 10.90

42.707.40 11.00 10.00

9.29

11.20

9.85

9.60

9.14

11.00

76

Page 80: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedB (Boron)

63.0

-6 X 22az

4. ICP 6. ICP/MS22az. Color azomethine

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

3022.4

150.045.6

5.8

541.852.0

1125.0

MPVF-pseudosigma

NHuHl

45.65.836

48.340.5

Lab Rating Z-vaiue 22az1 3 5

11 1516 18 24 26 2842 46 48 687085 86

119 128 129132 134 138 141 142145 158 180 191 212215 217 219 234 235236 240 255 265 273

4 3 3 3

NR0

NR 2 2 44 0

NR 0

NR3 4 3 3 00 4 3 2 44 4 3 4 20 4 4 4 32 1 4 40

0.02 -0.96 0.62 0.76

5.40

-1.50 -1.37 -0.020.24

-3.99

13.64

-0.55 0.02

-0.62 -0.81 13.64-3.02 0.26

-0.65 -1.19 0.17

-0.15 0.38 0.55

-0.27 1.10

12.96 0.05 0.24

-0.26 -0.96-1.41 -1.99 0.21

-0.27 17.94

45.7 40.0 49.2 50.0 <5077.0 <50 36.9 37.6 45.5

47.0 22.4

<100 125.0 <5042.4 45.7 42.0 40.9

125.028.0 47.1

41.8 38.7 46.644.7 47.8 48.8

44.0 52.0

121.0 45.9 47.0 44.1 40.037.4 34.0 46.8

44.0 150.0

77

Page 81: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 45 (trace constituents)-ContinuedBa (Barium)

1. AA: direct air 4. ICP 2. AA: direct nitrous oxide 5. DCP 3. AA: graphite furnace 6. ICP/MS

N= 0 0 Minimum = < 0.05 < 1 00

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

1 3 457

11 13 15 16 1824 25 26 28 303233 36 40 4648 59 68 70 7581 83 85 86 8789 96 97

102 105107 113 119 121 128133 134 138 141 142145 146 149 151 158

Rating4 4 4 3 33 2 1 4 42 3 4 333 0 0 3 40 4 3

NR 42 3 4 41

NR NR 0 0 224 2 3 04 3 4 341 3 1 4 3

Z-value 1 2-0.19 -0.32 -0.05 -0.59 0.76

-0.59 1.46

-1.56 0.49

-0.49-1.24 0.65 0.27 0.81

-0.59-0.92 2.10

-20.02 < 0.05 -0.97 0.273.29

-0.05 0.76

0.05-1.13 -0.86 0.32

-0.16 1.56

<100 -4.26 2.64

-1.241.03

-0.05 1.03

-0.59 -2.81-0.38 -0.81 -0.38 0.59 0.052.00 0.76 1.56 0.38 0.65

7 42 1 29.2 31.0 41.0 44.5 42.0 40.0 37.0

3.4 1.9345

36.5 37.0 36.0 38.536.0 39.8 34.2

36.234.8 38.3 37.6 38.6 36.0

41.0

35.3 37.6

43.2

38.5 <50 37.2

35.5 37.7 36.8

40.0<50

29.2 42.0

39.0 37.0 39.0 36.0

36.4 35.6 36.4 38.2

40.8 38.5

40.0

38.3

13 31.9 42.0 37.0

1.96

36.8

38.0

35.4

37.0

35.0

34.8

31.9

37.2

37.8

MPV =F-pseudosigma

N =Hu =Hl =

37.11.963

38.535.0

Lab Rating Z-value180191196204212215217219224234235236240241255259265

44420241031400424

-0.490.49-0.431.242.641.030.00-1.67-2.100.651.56-0.43-3.293.99-0.16-1.130.49

36.2

39.4

39.037.134.033.238.340.036.331.0

44.536.8

35.0

38.036.3

42.0

38.0

78

Page 82: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedBe (Berylium) p,g/L

11.50

6.50

1. AA: direct air 4. 2. AA: direct nitrous oxide 6.3. AA: graphite furnace 0.

N= 1Minimum = 10.00Maximum =

Median =F-pseiHJosigma =

ICP ICP/MSOther

0 9< 10 7.20

11.008.930.68

372.30

13.209.000.39

158.00

13.009.350.83

Lab Rating Z-value

MPV'

F-pseudosigma :N'

HITHl =

9.040.70

629.648.70

13 57

1113 15 16 18 2526 30 32 364042 46 48 59 6869 70 75 76 8183 85 86 89 9697 102 105 113 114119 121 128 133 134138 141 142 144 145146 151 158 180 191

4 4 4 4 44 4 34 240 3 0 00 4 2 2 41 4 4 1 24 3 4 2 23 4 2 1 NR4 2 3 3 44 4 4 0 22 4 242

-0.14 0.24 -0.28 -0.48 -0.050.19 -0.48 -0.91 0.24 -1.340.19 -2.06 0.88 2.82 -9.675.69 -0.11 1.38 1.10 0.38-1.57 0.19 0.09 1.67 -1.49-0.34 0.87 -0.35 -1.20 1.38 10.000.57 -0.34 1.38 1.53

<-0.17 1.38

-0.91 0.52 0.140.27 0.05 0.45

-12.96 <0.01 1.24

-1.21 -0.09 1.24 -0.48 1.38

9.20 8.84 8.70 9.009.17 8.70

9.20 8.109.17 7.60

11.00 2.30

8.96 10.00

9.307.94

9.17 9.10

8.80 9.64 8.79

8.20

9.43 8.80

10.10 10

8.9210.00

9.40 9.139.22 9.07

9.908.19

9.90 8.70

8.94

8.40

9.65

13.00

9.80

10.20 8.00

10.00

8.40

9.35

8.97

10.00

Lab Rating Z-value193196212213215217224234235236241245255265

44044304430444

-0,05-0.292.820.12-0.48-0.625.98-0.14-0.05-0.77-2.63-0.15-0.290.17

9.00

9.12

-

7.208.93

8.708.60

13.208.949.008.50

8.83

8.8311.00

9.15

79

Page 83: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedCa (Calcium) mg/L

6 D 20

0. Other 1. AA: direct air2. AA: direct nitrous oxide

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

4. 6.

ICP ICP/MS

20. Titrate: colorimetric3

30.332.5

1612435.030.0

1.4

624.034.0

5212.133.531.0

1.3

330.131.5

40.0

32.6

Lab Rating Z-value 2013 4 57

11 13 15 16 1819 23 24 25 2628 30 32 33 364243 46 48 5969 70 75 81 8385 86 87 8997102 105 107 109 113114 119 121 128 129132 133 134 138 140

24 4 1 33 1 1 4 44 0 3 443 2 3 4 30 4 2 3 34 3 3 4 34 3 2 3 21 4 4 1 10 3 3 2 04 4 3 3 0

-1.32 0.32 -0.16 -1.90 0.880.79 1.98 -1.67 -0.48 -0.080.24

-14.52 -0.56 0.32 -0.080.63 1.03 0.63 -0.32 30.3 -0.56

-14.76 0.24 1.03 0.71 -0.56-0.40 0.71 -0.56 -0.48 -0.560.24 0.87 -1.19 -0.95 -1.271.83 -0.32 0.16 -1.59 1.98-5.32 0.79 -0.56 1.03 2.620.08 -0.24 0.60 0.63 3.41

12.4

30.0

30.2

30.0

31.0

29.5 29.1

30.9 28.7

34.0

35.0

29.0 31.1 30.5 28.3 31.831.7 33.2 28.6 30.1 30.631.0

30.0 31.1 30.631.5

32.0 31.5

12.1 31.0 32.0 31.6 30.0

31.6

30.1 30.0

31.8 29.2

33.0 30.3

33.224.0

31.7 30.0 32.0

30.8 30.4 31.5 31.5

MPVF-pseudosigma

NHuHl

30.71.384

31.730.0

Lab Rating Z-value 20141 142 145 146 158180 190 191 193 203204 212 215 217 218219 220 221 224 234235 236 240 241 255257 261 265 268 270271 272 273 274

24 1 3 14 4 4 2 23 3 3 0 43 4 2 1 40 4 1 1 40 3 4 2 21 0 2 NR

1.03 -0.50 1.67 -0.87 1.510.24 -0.32 -0.08 -1.03 -1.290.79 0.95 0.79 -3.02 0.20-0.56 0.24 1.35 -1.77 0.242.22 -0.37 -1.83 -1.83 -0.422.62 -0.51 0.00 -0.92 1.431.51

-13.23 1.35

-24.36

32.0 30.1 32.8 29.6 32.631.0

30.3 3C.6

29.4 29.1

31.7 31.9 31.7 26.9

31.030.0

31.0 32.4

28.531.033.5 30.2 28.4

28.430.2

34.0

30.7 29.5

32.5

32.4

30.1

32.6 14.0

0.0

80

Page 84: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145(trace constituentsj-ContinuedCd (Cadmium)

11.75

6.75

1. AA: direct air3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximurn =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

4 29 347.60 4.60 5.90

16.00 37.00 17.209.35 9.230.86 0.89

139.00

11.009.390.56

Lab Rating Z-value

MPV = 9.33F-pseudosigma = 0.82

N= 80Hu = 10.00HI = 8.90

1 3 457

11 13 15 16 1823 2426 28 3032 36 40 42 4648 58 59 68 6970 73 7580 8183 85 86 87 8996 97 102 105 113114 118 119 121128132 133 134138 140

3 3 4 3 04 4 0 4 44 0 2 1 44 3 2 4 34 0 4 3 234 4 NR 33 0 4 0 43 4 3 34NR1 4 1 32 1 4 4 4

0.56 0.94 0.21 -0.53 4.50-0.40 0.13 9.65 -0.28 -0.16-0.21 -2.12 1.31

-1.51 0.33-0.18 -0.90 -1.02 -0.40 -0.60-0.16 33.93 -0.40 0.82 1.31

-0.90 -0.40 -0.42

0.82-0.65 -2.12 -0.16 3.27 0.16-0.53 -0.16 0.70 0.65 0.47

1.56 -0.16 -1.63 0.94-1.02 1.56 -0.09 -0.31 -0.40

9.79

8.90

9.16

10.40

8.60

8.849.20

37.00

10.408.60

<10 10.00

7.60

12.00 9.468.90 9.20

<10 10.60 9.20

9.00

10.10 9.50

13.009.00 9.44

17.20

9.20

7.60

8.10 9.60

8.50

10.00

9.00 8.99

8.80

9.20

9.90

9.71

8.00

8.50 10.60 9.26

9.10

9.18

9.00

9.00

9.86

10.10

9.08

Lab Rating Z-value141 142 145 146 149151 158 180 190 191193 196 212 213 215217 219 221 224 234235 236 240 241 245249 255 257 259 265273 274

4 3 1 4 34 0 3 241 4 1 2 30 3 4 0 43 0 0 341 3 0 0 30 0

-0.43 0.60 2.05 -0.37 0.820.07 -5.80 0.82 1.19 -0.022.05 0.07 2.05 -1.40 0.82-2.73 -0.65 0.37 -4.21 0.330.58 -2.37 3.27 0.58 0.02-1.63 0.66 8.18 -4.08 0.829.65 -2.98

10.00

4.60

10.30

11.00

8.19 10.00

9.63

9.60

9.80 9.358.00

16.00 6.00

6.90

8.98

11.00 9.03

10.00

7.10 8.80

5.90

9.80 7.40 12.00

9.87

17.20

9.82

9.39

9.31

9.39 11.00

10.00

81

Page 85: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedCo (Cobalt)

12.0

11.0

10.0

9.0

8.0

7.0

i

/ /J»+_ _______ .^~**»++« 1

V"^

::::::/ ̂^OtO^ - ... . - - . AA^^

w^^ ^^^

/J *

. AA: direct air 6. ICP/MS J. AA; graphite furnace 0. Other I. ICP 0. Other

N= 1 7 Minimum = 19.0 9.0

Maximum = 10.6 Median = 10.0

F-pseudosigma = 0.4Lab Rating

1 4 3 0 4 35 4 7 1

11 2 13 0 15 NR 16 4 18 424 0 26 4 30 4 32 4 40 042 0 46 3 48 NR 68 1 70 NR75 3 81 0 86 3 89 497 4

102 2 105 4 119 3 121 4 128 2132 3 134 4 138 1 141 NR 142 4145 0 146 3 158 3 180 4 191 3196 3 212 4 213 3 215 2 217 3219 3 221 4 224 4 234 3 235 0

Z-value 1 3-0.03 -4.50 0.67 0.11 1.571.12

-2.70

0.45 -0.11-5.85 0.45 0.22 0.22

-3.264.50 0.79

1.69

0.90 -2.25 0.56

-0.03 10.0 -0.36 9.71.12

-0.45 -0.69 0.00 1.12

-0.56 0.26 10.2

-1.53

-0.335.17

-0.88 0.67

-0.37 0.87

-0.67 0.00 0.67 10.6

-1.12 -0.56-0.79 0.00 10.0 0.11 0.67 10.6 3.37

_c^_^3 ^4 ^6

MPV= 10.0 F-pseudosigma = 0.9

32 13 N= 53 4.8 8.0 Hu= 10.6

14.6 14.0 Hl= 9.4 10.2 9.7

1.2 0.646 Lab Rating Z-value 1346

10.0 236 0 -4.95 5.6 6.0 240 0 -4.72 5.8

10.6 255 3 0.60 10.5 10.1 257 0 10.12 19.0 11.4 259 2 -1.12 9.011.0 265 3 -0.56 9.5 7.6 273 2 1.12 11.0

<20 10.4

9.94.8

10.4 10.2

10.27.1

14.0 10.7 <50 11.5 <5010.8

8.0 10.5

11.0 9.6 9.4

10.0 11.09.5

8.6<10

9.714.6 9.2

10.6 9.7

10.89.4

10.0

9.0 9.59.3

10.1

13.0

82

Page 86: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedCr (Chromium) jig/L

1. AA: direct air 2. AA: direct nitrous oxide3. AA: graphite furnace

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

4. ICP 6. ICP/MS

1 316.0 14.4

30.0

3010.020.115.8

2.1

309.5

19.315.2

1.2

1410.918.014.5

1.3Lab Rating Z-value

13 4 57

10 11 13 15 1618 2326 30 3236 40 42 46 4858 59 68 69 7073 75 76 81 8385 86 87 89 9697 102 105 113 114118 119 128 132 133134 138 140 141 142

4 24 4 14 4 3 3 23 0 4 3 30 0 1 3 224 3 3 44 3 4 4 4NR4 3 1 33 4 4 4 031 1 4 44 0 40 3

0.14 1.21 -0.21 0.14 1.920.50 -0.21 0.57 0.57 -1.07-0.71 -2.13 0.07 -0.71 -0.57-3.76 -4.12 1.92 0.78 1.491.21 0.50 0.85 -0.78 -0.070.50 0.57 -0.36 0.50 -0.07

-0.43 -0.64 1.56 0.640.64 0.50 0.07 0.21 3.340.85 -1.63 -1.63 0.14 0.00-0.49 -3.12 0.50 -2.34 -0.99

15.5

16.0

12.3 15.4

10.0

16.4 17.417.0

14.2

16.0

14.4 17.5 16.216.2

20.016.5 13.0

16.0

17.0 15.0 15.5 18.0

15.0 16.1 16.1

14.3

14.3

9.5

16.5

15.216.0 16.1

15.2<10 14.7

16.0

15.6

15.5 15.314.6

12.0

13.8

14.5

18.0

16.0

14.8

15.4

13.0

10.9

13.9

MPVF-pseudoskjma

NHu Hl

15.31.478

16.214.3

Lab Rating Z-value145 146 149 151 158180 190 191 193 196204 212 213 215 217219 221 234 235 236241 245 249 253 255257 259 265 273

0 3 23 13 0 4 4 20 0 4 3 11 4 24 43 1 1 0 30 3 4 2

2.84 -0.57 1.21 -0.57 -1.56-0.71 2.70 0.07

-0.21 -1.213.20 -2.34 0.07 -0.92 -1.85-1.63 -0.21 1.14 -0.21 -0.43-0.64 -1.63 1.63 3.39 -0.5210.44 -0.92 0.50 1.21

17.0

13.1

19.1

15.0

19.8

15.4 14.0

15.0 16.9 15.0

14.4 13.0 17.6 20.1

30.0 14.0

19.3 14.5

14.5

14.3

15.4

13.6

12.0

12.713.0

14.7

14.6

16.0 17.0

83

Page 87: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedCu (Copper)

15.5 i

1, AA: direct air3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

9 247.7 Z6

30.0 19.011.0 11.02.2 0.8

384.6

29.011.11.6

139.3

14.011.30.7

Lab Rating Z-value

4858 NR

0.20 11.3<50

F-pseudoskjma =11.0

1.484

12.110.2

135 7 1011 13 15 16 1819 23 26 28 303236 40 42 46

4 0 31 434 4 4 30 4 4 0 44 0 3 24

0.04 -2.14 0.55 2.04 -0.160.70 0.20 0.06 0.27 0.91-2.14 0.34 0.48 ^.56 -0.010.20 5.67 -0.72 1.41 0.20

11.1

10.8

8.0 11.5

19.0

11.3

8.0 11.8 13.9

12.0 11.3 11.1

12.3

11.7 4.6

11.0

10.0

11.4

11.3

13.0

Lab Rating Z-value

59 68 6970 73 75 80 8183 85 86 87 8996 97 102 105 107113 114118 119 121128 129 132 133 134

40 334 3 4 43 2 4 1 32 34 4 33 NR 4 342 0 0 1 4

-0.16 2.83 -0.580.55 -0.01 -0.58 -0.23 -0.010.55 1.12 -0.09 -1.93 -0.581.33 -0.58 -0.01 0.27 -0.580.84

-0.09 -0.72 -0.01-1.22 13.48 12.77 -1.51 0.01

15.0 10.2

11.8 11.0 10.2

10.7 11.0

11.8 12.6

10.9 8.3

10.212.9 10.2

11.0

10.212.2

<10 10.9

10.0 11.0

30.0 29.0 8.9

11.0

10.8

11.4

9.3

138 140 141 142 144145 146 151 158 180190 191 193 196 203204 212 213 215 217219 221 224 234 235236 240 241 245 249253 255 257 259 265273274

3 0 2 3 30 1 3 1 44 4 NR4 00 0 4 0 42 4 1 3 11 3 0 4 43 4 2 4 30 0

-0.84 2.12 14.0 1.19 -0.65 -0.515.88 1.90 0.55 1.97 -0.30-0.01 -0.01

<25 0.13 -2.36 7.7-3.99 2.12 0.13 2.83 -0.01-1.15 -0.30 1.55 0.98 -1.79-1.58 0.70 2.75 0.13 -0.48-0.72 10.0 -0.49 1.41 13.0 -0.01 11.0 0.55^.27 -6.01

10.3

11.0

5.4

11.2 15.0

10.6

14.9 11.2 10.4

2.6

12.7

19.3 13.7

13.8 10.6

11.09.4

13.2 12.4 8.58.8

12.0

10.3

5.0

9.8

10.1

11.8

11.0

11.2

14.0

11.8

84

Page 88: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedFe (Iron) |ig/L

1. AA: direct air 3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

5. 6.

DCP ICP/MS

22. Colorimetric2078

230100

15

641

147

5630

129101

6

1 4120 85

183

297

113

Lab Rating Z-value 2213 45 7

10 11 13 15 1618 23 24 25 2630 32 33 35 3640 42 43 46 4858 59 68 69 7073 75 80 81 8385 86 87 89 9196 97102 105 107109 113 114 119 121

3 0 4 443 21 204 NR 4 0 40 0 0 3 03 3 24 04 4 3 3 44 4 41 44 4 0 0 32 4 2 4 244 4 4 4

-0.59 2.41 0.13 -0.19 0.320.51 -1.39 2.03 -1.13 -3.00-0.13

-0.35 -2.28 0.13

16.34 10.39 2.41 -0.51 4.94-0.82 0.76 1.14 0.00 -8.99-0.13 -0.13 0.51 0.89 0.130.00 -0.35 -0.25 -2.03 -0.130.25 0.25 3.42 3.17 -0.631.39 0.13 1.27 0.25 -1.39-0.46 0.13 -0.13 0.38 0.00

105

<500

230

140

100

108

99

128

112

9097

100

96 120 102 100 104

90 117 92 77100

98 83 102

183 120

97

95107 110 101 30

100 105

102101 98

85 100103 103

126 96

102 111 103

102

104 101

6 D 22

MPV = F-pseudosigma =

Hu =

1018

8910796

Lab Rating Z-value 5 6 22128 129 132 133 134138 140 141 142 145146 149151 155 158180 190 191 203 204212213 215 217 219220 221 224 234 235236 240 241 249 253255 257 265 273274

20 0 4 44 3 1 3 44 4 2 1 24 1 4 3 22 3 3 3 24 1 3 4 240 0 0 04 0 3 30

-1.23 -2.91 3.55 0.38 -0.080.38 0.76 -1.99 0.63 0.15-0.32 -0.13 -1.42 1.56 1.01-0.29 -1.65 -0.38 -0.63 -1.011.14 0.51 0.63 0.63 -1.14-0.38 2.03 -0.820.13 1.14-0.42 -2.28 2.53 -7.60 10.01-0.25 -2.53 -0.51 -0.63 5.83

91 78

129104 100104

107 85 106 10299

100 90

113 10999

88 98

96 93110

105 106 106 92

98 117

95 102 11098 83

121 41

18099

81 97 96

147

85

Page 89: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedK (Potassium) mg/L

2.40-

2.20-

2.00-

1.80 -

1.60-

1 4 5

1 ^>0/~

j-fjff^^ ^^^^0000^^^-.^rtJLJ-« pOO^^^O1^^^^^

' ^cT

CD

_0_,^4^-.-<-,^-7-»-,2

. AA- direct air 6. ICP/MS ICP 7. Ion chromatograpriy MPV = DCP 12. Rame emission F-pseudosigma =

N=244313210 N = Minimum= 1.60 1.60 2.18 2.03 2.13 1.76 Hu = Maximum= 5.15 38.30 2.11 2.13 Z80 Hl =

Median = 114 2.12 2.35 F-pseudosigma = 0.13 0.18 0.40

Lab1 3 57

1113 15 16 18 1923 24 25 26 2832 33 36 40 4243 46 4851 5968 69 70 81 8385 86 87 89 97

102 105 107 109 113114 119 121 128 129132 134 138 140 141

Rating40 4 1 44 0 0 4 44 2 24 24 4 0 3 24 3 4 4 04 2 2 3 40 4 0 3 43 43 443 0 4 3 43 4 4 3 4

Z-value 1 4 5 6 7 12 Lab Rating Z-value 1 40.25 2.17 142 1 -1.66 1.86

14.53 4.50 145 3 0.55 2.22 -0.06 2.12 146 0 2.94 2.61 2.02 2.46 180 3 -0.80 2.00

-0.06 2.12 190 4 0.00-0.31 2.08 191 4 -0.12

221.79 38.30 193 3 -0.55 2.04 -3.25 1.60 203 0 2.45 2.53 -0.18 2.10 204 4 -0.06 -0.18 2.10 212 3 -0.80 2.00-0.25 2.09 215 4 0.43 2.20 -1.17 1.94 217 1 -1.78 1.84 1.10 2.31 218 4 -0.37 2.07 0.00 2.13 219 4 0.43 2.20 1.17 2.32 220 4 0.43 2.20

-0.18 2.10 221 3 0.55 2.22 0.31 2.18 224 2 -1.10 1.95

-3.25 1.60 234 4 -0.06 2.12 -0.86 1.99 235 0 8.40 3.50 1.04 2.30 236 4 0.00 2.130.43 2.20 241 4 -0.43 2.06 0.80 2.26 249 2 1.41 0.00 2.13 255 4 -0.31 2.08 0.18 2.16 257 0 2.88

-2.64 1.70 259 2 1.04 2.30-0.18 2.10 261 0 -2.27 1.29 2.34 265 4 -0.25 2.09

-1.04 1.96 268 0 2.63 2.55 -0.61 2.03 270 0 3.25 0.43 2.20 271 0 4.112.27 2.50 272 3 -0.80 0.49 2.21 273 0 5.21 2.98

18.52 5.15 274 0 3.37 -0.74 2.01 0.06 2.14

-0.80 2.00 -0.31 2.08 0.92 2.28 0.43 2.20

-0.06 2.12-0.80 2.00 -3.25 1.60 0.12 2.15

-0.86 1.99 -0.18 2.100.98 2.29 0.00 2.13

-0.18 2.10 0.74 2.25 0.25 2.17

7---j-. ...._.£__.

7'

...

2.13 0.16

83 2.28 2.06

5 6 7 12

2.132.11

2.12

2.36

2.60

1.76

2.66 2.802.00

2.68

86

Page 90: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedU (Lithium)

1. AA: direct air3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS0. Other0. Other

3 226.2 21.028.0 28.7

232.8

46.027.33.4

822.831.127.4

1.7Lab Rating Z-value

13 4 57

11 16 24 25 2630 32 40 426869 75 76 85105109 134 142 145 151191 196 212 217 219234 236 257 259 265

3 0 0 4 40 1 4 3 324 3 0 03 4 4 414 4 41 31 4 3 4 32 0 404

-0.72 2.30 3.50 -0.44 0.086.85 -1.81 0.12 0.68 -0.72-1.33 0.00 -0.81 -8.58 -9.890.56 0.00 0.12 -0.44 26.2 -1.65-0.28 26.6 0.17 0.28 1.61 -0.721.53 -0.28 0.68 -0.40 -0.931.25 -2.70 0.28 28.0 -2.540.04

25.5 33.0 36.0 26.2 27.544.3

27.6 29.0 25.524.0

25.3 6.0 2.8

28.7 27.3

23.2

27.7 28.031.3

26.3 25.030.4 20.6

21.0

22.8

27.3

27.6

25.531.1 26.6 29.0

27.4

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =HI*

27.32.536

28.925.5

273 7.53 46.0

87

Page 91: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 45 (trace constituents)-ContinuedMg (Magnesium) mg/L

9.wU

Q nn

8.50

8.00

7.50

7 nn

012

' -£- -fi-FE-.- ___ T_=d?r:rff15^

; D

Other AA: direct air AA: direct nitrous oxide

N =

Minimum = Maximum =

Median = F-pseudosigma =

Lab Rating Z-vaiue1 2 -1.13 3 4 -0.35 4 4 0.06 5 2 -1.28 7 3 0.87

11 2 1.17 13 3 0.88 15 2 -1.28 16 4 -0.17 18 4 -0.1719 4 0.28 23 4 0.10 24 3 -0.52 25 3 -0.61 26 3 0.9528 4 0.50 30 3 0.72 32 3 0.97 33 3 0.61 36 0 -2.4040 4 -0.43 42 2 1.39 43 4 0.28 46 4 -0.01 48 4 0.4851 0 17.38 59 4 -0.39 68 3 0.84 69 3 -0.68 70 4 0.1275 4 0.50 81 4 -0.21 83 4 -0.50 85 3 0.55 86 4 -0.0187 3 -0.70 89 3 -0.86 97 4 -0.28

102 0 3.62 105 4 0.01107 3 0.52 109 4 -0.39 113 4 0.37 114 1 -1.51 119 3 0.95121 3 -0.84 128 3 -0.88 129 3 0.72 132 4 0.26 133 3 -0.64

jjjjj-l P

rf

<T ««"V"

4. ICP 6. ICP/MS 20. Titrate: cotorimetric

2 19 5 8.63 7.40 7.40 8.95 16.47 9.00

8.55 0.42

0 1 2

8.72

9.00

8.95 7.60

16.47

8.37

8.90

8.92

8.36 8.29 8.55

8.91 8.50

8.00

9.00

. _ _ .^^AOOOO*>w*x>9C^

-0-*-1-<^

52 3 4 8.09 8.58 0.00

10.30 9.11 25.15 8.69 0.44

4 6 208.17 8.52 8.70 8.10 9.069.20 9.07 8.10 8.60 8.608.80

8.44 8.40 9.108.90

9.11

8.48 9.30 8.80 8.67 8.89

8.50 9.05

8.73

8.58 8.45

8.67

10.30 8.68

8.84

9.108.30 8.28

8.79 8.39

______________ ^-sfiV&tP^ ______ «* _

^ 7

2 -^4^6-c_-2o

MPV= 8.68 F-pseudosigma = 0.45

N= 85 Hu= 9.00 H!= 8.40

Lab Rating Z-value 01246134 4 -0.23 8.57 138 4 0.46 8.88 140 1 1.84 9.50 141 2 1.01 9.13 142 2 -1.10 8.18145 2 1.35 9.28 146 2 -1.06 8.20 158 1 1.84 9.50 180 4 0.39 8.85 190 4 -0.10 8.63191 3 0.70 8.99 193 2 -1.06 8.20 203 4 -0.30 8.54 212 1 1.62 9.40 215 4 0.50 8.90217 2 -1.30 8.09 218 4 -0.50 8.45 219 4 -0.17 8.60 220 3 0.72 9.00 221 3 -0.72 8.35224 3 -0.93 8.26 234 4 -0.37 8.51 235 0 2.06 9.60 236 3 0.72 9.00 240 4 -0.39 8.50241 0 -2.84 7.40 255 4 -0.12 8.62 257 0 -2.84 7.40 261 0 4.74 1 265 4 0.06 8.70268 4 -0.07 8.65 271 0 36.74 2 272 0 -5.82 273 0 2.06 9.60 274 0 -19.34

20

0.80

5.15 6.06

0.00

88

Page 92: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituent-ContinuedMn (Manganese) jig/L

24.5

23.5

22.5

21.5

20.5

19.5

18.5

17.5

16.5

i

f jf /

P J jXxT JN^

A T _^ &XX? ^J?*

-f

'rn 3EF=----- / ^0xOOOO|Ol^<

J*

50CWVVV,.,,.,,.A -Jr

<r ?"" "l / " - - ---------- Q 1 M 3 O 4 A 5 4 6 X 22

. AA: direct air 3. AA: graphite furnace t. ICP

Minimum = Maximum =

Median^ F-pseudosigma =

Lab1 3 457

10 11 13 15 1618 23 24 25 262830 32 33 3640 42 43 46 4858 59 68 69 7073 75 80 81 8386 87 89 91 9697

102 105 107 109113 114 119 121 128

Rating Z-value4 -0.44 0 -2.63 4 0.07 4 0.07 4 0.340 2.77 4 0.07 3 -0.94 0 2.09 4 0.404 -0.40 3 0.61 3 -0.74 4 0.07 4 0.401 1.62 4 0.074 0.00 3 -0.61 3 0.741 -1.89 2 1.42 3 -0.61 4 -0.34 3 -0.61

NR 4 0.07 4 0.40

NR 4 -0.204 0.07 4 -0.07 1 -1.62 3 -0.61 4 -0.404 -0.40 0 4.11 4 -0.34 4 -0.40 0 4.110 2.23 2 1.42 3 -0.88 3 -0.61 2 -1.084 0.40 4 0.07 4 0.07 3 0.74 2 -1.48

5. DCP 6. ICP/MS 22. Cdorimetric

14 9 47 1 13 1 10.0 8.0 16.0 20.0 18.7 30.7 27.0 25.2 25.1 23.0 20.4 22.4 20.8 20.9

2.7 1.8 1.0 1.81 3 4 5 6 22

20.3 17.0 21.0 21.021.4

25.0 21.0 19.5 24.0

21.520.3

21.8 19.8 21.0 21.523.3 21.0

20.9 20.0

22.018.1

23.0 20.0 20.4 20.0

<50 21.0

21.5 <20

20.621.0 20.8

18.5 20.0

20.320.3

27.0 20.4

20.3 27.0

24.223.0

19.6 20.0 19.3

21.5 21.0

21.0 22.0

18.7

MPV = F-pseudosigma =

Hu =Hl =

Lab Rating Z-value 1 3129 0 -7.35 10.0 132 2 -1.28 134 4 0.10 138 4 -0.27 140 2 -1.28 19.0141 4 0.00 142 3 0.74 145 1 1.62 146 4 -0.20 149 3 0.74 22.0151 3 -0.94 158 2 1.21 180 4 -0.27 183 0 2.90 25.2 190 2 1.01 22.4191 3 0.74 196 2 -1.21 203 3 -0.61 20.0 204 0 -3.31 212 3 0.74215 3 -0.81 217 3 -0.74 220 4 -0.34 20.4 221 2 1.01 22.4 224 3 0.74234 4 0.00 235 3 -0.61 236 4 -0.27 240 2 -1.28 241 2 1.42 23.0244 0 6.61 245 0 2.77 25.0 255 4 -0.09 257 0 -2.63 17.0 265 2 1.15273 0 2.83 274 0 -8.73 8.0

20.9 1.5 85

22.0 20.0

4 5 6 22

19.0 21.1 20.5

20.9 22.0 23.3 20.6

19.5 22.720.5

22.0 19.1

16.0 22.0

19.7 19.8

22.020.9 20.0 20.5 19.0

30.7

20.8

22.625.1

89

Page 93: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedMo (Molybdenum)

13.00

2. AA: direct nitrous oxide3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

1 1072.0 8.2

12.29.81.7

205.0

20.19.02.2

128.2

10.09.00.7

Lab Rating Z-value

MPV = 9.23F-pseudosigma = 1.29

N = 43Hu = 10.00Hl= 8.27

1357

1115 16 18 23 2628 30 32 40 4248 68 70 75 8687 97

105 109119128 132 134 138 141142 145 146 149 151180 191 196 212 215217 219 221 224 234235 236 241 245 255

4 0

NR NR 30 4

NR NR 30 4 3 3 34 2

NR NR02 44 3 30 0 4 3

NR4 2

NR343 4 3 3 31 0 3 0 23

NR 1 0 4

-0.44 -2.51

0.608.45

-0.26

<1000.52

-2.20 0.13

-0.82 0.52 0.600.05

-1.50

6.591.38 0.27 0.12

-0.80 -0.70-2.90 2.15

-0.43 -0.65

0.06 -1.27

0.60 -0.100.99 0.05

-0.54 -0.65 -0.65-1.58 -3.29 -0.81 2.93 1.14

-0.96

1.69 2.31 0.00

8.67 6.00 <10 <15

10.0020.10

<20

9.906.40 9.40

9.90

9.30 7.30 <50 <10

17.7011.00 9.58

8.20

5.50 12.00 8.68

<10

7.60 <10

10.00

10.50

8.407.20 5.00

8.19 13.00

10.708.00 <11

11.40 12.20

9.23

8.90

8.18

10.00

9.38

8.33

8.39

9.31

9.10

9.30 8.54 8.40

Lab Rating Z-value257265

48.81 72.00 -0.18 9.00

90

Page 94: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)~ContinuedNa (Sodium) mg/L

46.0 45.0 44.0 43.0 42.0 41.0 40.0 39.0 38.0 37.0 36.0 35.0

i

:_._______!________ >

- ^__________________^^500c00oc^--_______

-___. =jrf*rr____ _ <x#*SX&*#**'rCM~ j^f

/ J>

-n-,^,^..^..^^,

. AA: direct air I ICP 5. DCP

N= 22 Minimum = 34.0 Maximum = 48.5

Median = 40.4 F-pseudosigma = 2.4

Lab1 3 57

1113 15 16 18 1923 24 25 26 2832 33 3640 4243 46 48 51 5968 69 70 758183 85 86 87 8997

102 105 107 109113 114119 121 128129 132 134 138 140

Rating3 24 2421 3 3 4240 304 3 1 3 43 3 3 4 334 4 3 34 4 3 3 34 0 3 3 40 0 2 2 44 3 4 40

Z-value 1-0.53 1.27 0.11 1.13

-0.261.32

-1.53 -0.53 -0.63 0.37

-1.38 38.6 -0.37 2.54 0.85 6.30

-0.37 0.53

-1.69 38.0 -0.63 -0.110.95 0.74 0.79

-0.11 -0.630.95 0.00 0.32 0.69 42.5

-0.63-0.45 0.48 42.1 0.85

-0.85 39.6 -0.58 40.10.32 41.8

-2.22 0.53

-0.53 40.2 0.00 41.2

-3.02 -3.81 34.0 1.01

-1.16 -0.420.42 42.0 0.61 0.00 41.2 0.21 3.86 48.5

6. ICP/MS 7. Ion chromatography MPV = 12. Rame emission F-pseudosigma =

47 1 3 1 10 N = 35.5 42.2 40.0 41.4 22.4 Hu = 53.1 40.5 50.0 Hl = 41.8 41.1

2.1 4.44 5 6 7 12 Lab Rating Z-value 1 4

40.2 141 3 0.95 43.0 43.6 142 4 0.30 41.8 41.4 145 1 1.59 44.2 43.3 146 3 0.63 42.4 40.7 180 4 0.26 41.743.7 190 4 0.11 38.3 191 3 -0.58 40.2 193 2 -1.06 39.2 40.0 203 3 -0.95 39.4 41.9 204 3 -0.95

212 1 1.69 44.4 40.5 215 3 0.63 42.4 46.0 217 4 -0.16 40.9 42.8 218 1 -1.69 38.0 53.1 219 3 -0.63 40.0

40.5 220 1 -1.69 38.0 42.2 221 4 0.00 41.2

224 0 -2.71 36.1 40.0 234 2 -1.06 39.2 41.0 235 0 3.60 48.043.0 236 4 -0.46 40.3 42.6 241 0 -2.22 37.0 42.7 249 4 0.48

41.0 255 3 -0.56 40.2 40.0 257 3 -0.6343.0 259 4 0.42 42.0

41.2 261 0 2.49 41.8 265 4 -0.32 40.6

268 4 -0.13 41.0 40.0 270 0 4.35

40.4 271 3 -0.63 272 0 4.66

42.8 273 1 1.96 44.9 274 0 -9.92

37.0 42.2

35.5

43.1 39.0 40.4

42.4

41.6

.-- r+# j*ir-

41.2 1.9 84

42.6 40.0

5 6 7 12

41.4 40.1

39.4

42.1

40.0

45.9

49.440.0 50.0

22.4

91

Page 95: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedNi (Nickel)

14.0 -

13.0-

12.0-

11.0-

10.0-

9.0-

8.0-

7.0 -

f

-4 nri .a

-D ^B

f

1. AA: direct air 3. AA: graphite furnace 4. ICP

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab Rating Z-value

1 4 -0.10 3 0 -2.40 4 3 -0.75 5 NR 7 NR

11 3 -0.75 13 4 -0.37 15 2 1.50 16 1 1.80 18 NR23 3 0.60 26 4 -0.15 28 0 4.72 30 4 0.37 32 4 0.0036 2 -1.50 42 2 1.50 48 4 0.30 58 0 44.22 59 4 0.3068 1 -1.87 69 2 -1.09 70 NR 73 3 -0.75 75 NR76 3 0.52 81 0 -3.00 83 4 -0.37 85 NR 86 1 -1.5187 0 3.22 89 4 0.22 96 4 -0.37 97 4 -0.37

102 4 0.00105 4 -0.15 113 4 0.37 114 NR 118 1 1.80 119 0 2.47128 4 0.00 132 0 2.25 133 3 -0.82 134 4 -0.37 138 2 -1.23140 3 -0.75 141 NR 142 4 0.00 145 0 4.05 146 NR

J.jT*j* 7*~

<r

-0-1-.-

6. ICP/MS

5 21 24 16 10.0 8.7 7.8 7.0 70.0 16.0 23.0 14.0

10.8 11.0 11.0 1.1 1.5 0.8

134610.9

7.8 10.0 <10 <2010.0 10.5

13.0 13.4

<2511.8 10.8

17.3 11.5

11.09.0

13.0 11.4

70.0 11.4

8.5 9.6

<50 10.0 <20

11.7 7.0

10.5 <10

9.015.3

11.3 10.5 10.5

11.010.8

11.5 <10

13.4 14.3

11.0 14.0 9.9

10.5 9.4

10.0 <20

11.0 16.4 <40

1

£

<""---"-?

1 ' 4

MPV = F-pseudosigma =

N = Hu = Hl =

Lab Rating Z-value 1 3149 3 -0.75 10.0 151 4 0.45 158 2 1.12 180 4 0.07 190 4 0.15 11.2191 3 0.67 193 NR <50 196 4 -0.30 212 0 2.25 213 3 -0.52 10.3215 3 0.75 12.0 219 3 -0.97 221 3 -0.60 10.2 224 4 -0.07 234 1 1.72 13.3235 3 0.75 236 3 -0.60 240 0 8.99 241 4 -0.37 10.5 245 4 -0.22 10.7249 1 -1.76 8.7 255 3 0.52 257 0 2.25 14.0 259 0 3.75 16.0 265 3 -0.75273 3 0.75

+

I?

. A * ^^^|i++++*-:

11.0 1.3 66

12.0 10.2

4 6

11.6 12.5 11.1

11.9

10.6 14.0

9.7

10.9

12.0 10.2 23.0

11.7

10.012.0

92

Page 96: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedPb (Lead)

1. Midirectair3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

2 47 1610.0 1.3 5.649.0 42.0 115.0

12.7 13.11.2 6.2

156.0

18.012.60.3

Lab Rating Z-vaiue

MPV = F-pseudosigma :

Hl =

12.71.280

13.712.0

13 4 5710 11 13 15 1618 19 23 26 2830 32 34 36 4246 48 58 59 6869 70 73 75 7680 81 83 85 8687 89 96 97

102105 109 113 114 118119 128 132 133 134

4 0 4 3 NR4 4 3 1 34 4 2 1 024 3 1 034 0 4 034 0 4 33 4 4 NR 323 44 13 0 4 NR424 0 0 4

-0.14 -5.51 0.21 0.62

-0.04 0.21 0.62 2.01 0.54-0.04 0.37 -1.34 -1.59 -2.65-1.02-0.12 0.54 1.84

-5.510.78 0.21

23.92 -0.283.15-0.61 0.04 2.66 -0.20 -0.53-0.85 0.21 -0.28

<50 0.54-1.26 -0.53 0.29 -0.04 1.840.86 -2.24 -0.45

<10 -0.20-1.02 0.13 7.98 7.32 -0.09

12.6 6.0

13.0 13.5

<5512.7

13.0 13.5 15.2

12.7 13.2 11.1 10.8

9.511.5

13.4 15.0

13.7 13.0 42.0

16.612.0 12.8

16.0 12.5

11.7 13.0 12.4

13.411.2 12.1 13.1 12.7

15.0

10.0 12.2

12.511.5

22.5 21.7 12.6

13.4

12.6

6.0

12.4

12.1

13.8

12.9

Lab Rating Z-value138 140 141 142 145146 149 151 158 180190 191 193 196204212 213 215 217 220221 224 234 236 240241245 249 255 257259 265 273 274

3 0 3 4 00 3 4 0

NR2 4 24 40 3 3 4 34 2 20 0013 4 00 4 0 0

-0.61 -2.24 10.0 0.70

-0.08 83.60

2.17-0.61 0.04

-5.02

-1.34 0.04 1.03

-0.12 -0.364.30 0.70 0.62

-0.20 -0.530.04

-1.47 1.35

-5.84 11.652.99 1.52 0.78 0.29

29.64 49.0-2.24 -0.28 -4.70-9.35

13.6

115.015.4

12.0

6.6 <27.2

11.1

14.0

12.3

13.6 13.5

12.112.8 11.0 14.4

5.6 27.0

16.4 14.6 13.7

13.1

10.0

7.0 1.3

12.0

12.7

12.8

12.8

12.6

18.0

12.5

12.4

93

Page 97: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 45 (trace constituents)-ContinuedSb (Antimony) jig/L

12.00

-11na

3. AA: graphite furnace 4. ICP6. ICP/MS

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

11na.AA: Hydride NaBH4

175.13

14.008.301.07

69.20

26.10

138.21

11.309.000.34

32.008.58

MPV =F-pseudosigma :

N =Hu =Hh

8.800.96

399.508.21

Lab Rating Z-value 11na1 3 5 7

1113 15 16 18 2630 32 36 42 4648 59 68 69 7075 81 89 96 97

102105 119 128 134138 141 142146 151180 193 196 212 215217 234236 240 241255 257 265

4 0

NR NR 32 4 4 1

NR4 4 0 2 323 3 3 0

NR0 3 3 40 4 3 4 44 0 0

NR 4

NR NR 3 4 04 1 0 0 30 0 4

-0.16 3.33

0.94-1.04 0.47 0.00

-1.67

0.42 -0.39 -2.92 1.25 0.52

-1.25 0.52

-0.99 -0.68 2.71

-2.92 -0.52 -0.63 0.27

-8.13 0.24

-0.73 0.36

-0.230.00

-3.82 2.60

0.25

-0.61 -0.21 5.42

-0.11 1.77

18.02 5.42

-0.523.26

-7.08 0.21

8.65 12.00 <20 <30 9.70

7.80 9.25

7.20 <209.20

6.00

9.307.60

7.85 8.15

11.40<50

8.30 8.20 9.06

<1

5.13

<20

<31.4<10

14.00

10.50 26.10 14.00

8.3011.93

8.80

8.43

10.00

9.30

<6

9.03 8.10

9.15 8.58

8.80

11.30

9.04

8.21 8.60

8.69

2.00 9.00

94

Page 98: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedSe (Selenium)

13.0

12.0

11.0

10.0

9.0

8.0

7.0

6.0

i

f

I

f 7 *,*+++* /

= !>**** **^ i»^^ »*

g_« F*"" O*

^_ 3 ^,^e^_,,ra

3. AA: graphite furnace t. ICP 5. ICP/MS

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

1 3 57

1011 13 15 16 1823 26 30 32 3436 42 46 48 5859 68 69 70 7375 80 86 87 8996 97

102 105 113118 119 128 133 134138 141 142 144 146149 151 180 190 191

Rating Z-value4 -0.06

NR 4 -0.05

NR 3 -0.811 1.97 2 -1.43 1 1.58 4 -0.04 4 0.043 -0.56 3 -0.96 3 0.73 4 0.19 4 0.121 -1.58 0 2.27 4 -0.42 2 -1.12

NR3 0.73 0 -2.43 4 0.12 3 0.73 0 17.694 0.04 3 -0.58 2 1.19 0 7.05 3 -0.584 -0.04 3 -0.98 0 2.27 3 0.96 4 -0.424 -0.35 4 -0.04 3 0.89 3 0.58 4 0.474 -0.37 3 -0.61 3 0.58 4 -0.04

NR4 -0.04 3 0.89

NR 3 0.73 2 1.50

11naAA: Hydride NaBH« MPV= 10.1

F-pseudosigma = 1.3 27 7 14 12 N= 60

5.0 10.5 9.6 8.7 Hu = 11.1 12.1 128.3 13.0 19.2 Hl= 9.3

9.5 13.0 11.1 10.0 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.9

3 4 6 11na Lab Rating Z-value 3 4 6 11na10.0 193 1 -1.58 8.0

<10 196 3 0.81 11.1 10.0 212 3 0.73 11.0

<50 215 0 -3.89 5.0 9.0 217 4 0.12 10.2

12.6 220 2 -1.12 8.6 8.2 221 4 -0.24 9.7

12.1 224 4 0.35 10.5 10.0 234 4 -0.33 9.6

10.1 236 0 91.15 128.39.3 240 0 6.13 18.0 8.8 241 0 -2.35 7.0

11.0 255 2 -1.47 8.1 10.3 259 2 -1.04 8.7

10.2 265 1 1.77 12.48.0

13.0 9.5 8.6

11.0 6.9

10.2 11.0

33.010.1

9.3 11.6 19.2

9.310.0 8.8

13.0 11.3

9.59.6

10.0 11.2

10.8 10.7

9.6 9.3

10.8 10.0

10.0 11.2

<50.1 11.0

12.0

95

Page 99: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)~ContinuedSi02 (Silica) mg/L

13.5

13.0

12.5

12.0

11.5

11.0

10.5

10.0

9.5

9.0

i

^yv-O1^

-o- ~*<***^ f I ***^s>^fy*>^^^ 4 ^ *-*-XrXi

^0^0^^^" £*' X*" j/"'"4^0 ** l-/^

O 2 0 4 A 5 * 6 X 22 * 22mb

2. AA: direct nitrous oxide I. ICP 5. DCP

Minimum = Maximum =

Median = F-pseudosigma -

Lab1 3 4 57

11 13 15 24 252632 33 42 4370 76 81 83 8789 97

104 105 107113 118 119 121 128129 134 138 140 142145 158 190 191 203204 212 215 217 219234235 236 240 241

Rating2 0 4 4 40 4 2 4 14 4 3 2 432 4 2 33 4 3 3 34 4 2 4 34 4 3 4 011 3 4 3434 1 34 1 0 23

Z-value-1.04 -8.12 0.15

-0.29 0.49

-3.44 -0.15 1.45 0.44 2.050.29 0.15

-0.58 1.16

-0.44-0.58 1.31 0.29

-1.31 0.73

-0.87 0.00

-0.84 -0.62 0.87

-0.44 0.19 1.02 0.00 0.730.26

-0.12 -0.73 -0.15 2.181.67 1.60 0.87

-0.29 -0.730.15 0.73 0.00

-1.99 -0.73-0.44 1.89

-6.18 -1.16 0.73

6. ICP/MS ( 22. Colorimetric MPV= 11.3 22mb. Color, mdybdate blue F-pseudosigma = 0.7

1 31 1 3 4 13 N= 53 11.8 5.7 10.9 11.1 11.0 10.7 Hu= 11.8

227.0 12.2 19.2 12.3 Hl= 10.9 11.3 11.4 0.9 0.7

2 4 5 6 22 22mb Lab Rating Z-value 2 4 5 6 22 22mb10.6 265 1 -1.74 10.1

5.7 273 0 312.88 227.0 11.4 274 0 11.44 19.2 11.1 11.68.9

11.2 12.3

11.6 12.711.5

11.4 10.9

12.1 11.0

10.9 12.2

11.5 10.4

11.810.7

11.3 10.7

10.9 11.9

11.0 11.4

12.0 11.3 11.8

11.5 11.2

10.8 11.2

12.812.5 12.4

11.9 11.1

10.811.4

11.8 11.3 9.9

10.811.0 12.6 7.0

10.5 11.8

96

Page 100: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported date for standard reference water sample T-1 45 (trace constituents)~ContinuedSr (Strontium)

0. Other 4. 1. AA: direct air 5. 2. AA: direct nitrous oxide 6.

N= 2 Minimum = 169

Maximum = 390 Median =

F-pseudosigma =I ah

134 57

11 16 18 24 2528 32 33 40 4259 68 70 81 858697

102 105109113 121 134 138 142145 151 190 191 196212 217 218 219 234235 236 240 265

Rating34 4 4 44 0 4 4 24 4 4 0 44 3 4 0 23 0 0 2043 3 3 21 3 04 23 20 343 4 34

Z-value 0-0.55 0.47 0.23 0.23 0.00

-0.12 -2.23-0.35 0.12 1.410.47 0.00

-0.35 -3.99 -0.23-0.35 0.82 0.35

-3.28 1.29

-0.82 -3.99 169 4.22

-1.06 -2.310.00

-0.94 -0.82 -0.59 1.071.55 0.59

21.94 390 0.00

-1.060.82

-1.17 3.05 0.82 0.350.59

-0.43 -0.70 -0.35

ICP DCP ICP/MS

1 1 32 1 183 229 169 200

239 203

71245

198 207 205 205 203202 184 200 204 215207

200 169 201200 210 206

214196

239 194

183203 195 196 198 212216

193 229

210 206208199 197

7 175 210 203

66

203

175

208

203 194210

200

MPV = F-pseudosigma :

N =

Hu =Hl =

2039

44208197

97

Page 101: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-1 45 (trace constituents)-ContinuedTl (Thallium) |ig/L

3. AA: graphite furnace 4. ICP 6. ICP/MS

N = Minimum -

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudoskjma =Lab

1 3

11 13 1516 18 23 32 3642 46 48 59 6970 76 81 89 97

102 113 119 128 134138 141 142 146 151180 191 193 196 212213 215 217 234 235240 241 265

Rating3

NR1 4 24 3 0 4004 2443 1 0

NR32 3 4 4 34

NR 3 4 4

NR 4 0 4 420 41 01 4 4

Z-value0.54

1.76 0.19

-1.390.26

-0.56 -3.81 0.11

-2.74-2.36 0.34

-1.20 0.07 0.41

-0.75 -1.54 25.74

0.521.39

-0.82 0.22 0.00 0.60

-0.11

0.52 -0.49 0.26

0.19 -2.36 0.00 0.26

-1.09 -3.07 -0.04 -1.65 -2.79-1.99 0.22

-0.11

17 4 7.9 10.0

16.9 20.0 13.3 3.4

3 416.7

<10 20.0

15.8 11.6

13.8 <5

8.0

16.2 12.1

16.413.3

<10 16.7

19.0 13.1

16.9

<50

14.0

<32.1

9.0

12.4 <7

10.9 7.9

10.0 15.9

16 9.0

84.0 15.6 0.7

6

16.0

15.6

9.0

15.5

11.2 84.0

15.9 15.3

15.0

16.7

16.0

15.8

15.3 16.0

15.2

15.0

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =Hl =

15.32.737

16.012.4

98

Page 102: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedU (Uranium)

1.40

4. ICP6. ICP/MS

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

1 8120 0.86

1.201.100.08

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =Hl =

1.100.10

91.121.07

Lab Rating Z-value1 7 16 30 75119 142 196 212 217

4 NR 3 3 NR4 0 4 4 4

-0.40

1.00 1.00

-0.30 -2.45 0.20 0.00 0.00

<120

1.20 <100

1.06

1.20

1.07 0.86 1.12 1.10 1.10

265 0.00 1.10

99

Page 103: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedV (Vanadium) jig/L

17.0 16.0 -

15.0 : - 14.0 -- 13.0 '-

12.0 11.0 10.09.08.0-7.0--

6.0

i

2. AA: direct nitrous oxide3. AA: graphite furnace4. ICP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS

1 439.0 9.5

14.2

306.0

18.811.5

1.6

119.0

15.011.8

1.1Lab Rating Z-value

13 5 7

1113 15 16 18 2628 30 32 40 4246 48 68 70 7581 85 86 89 97102 105 119 128 134138 141 142 145 146158 180 191 196 212217 219 224 234 235236 241 255 257 265

4 0 4 3 4NR NR1 4 41 4 4 3 13 2 2 NR 41 NR 3 2 23 4 3 3 34 3 3 044 4 4 341 3 0 4 14 34 0 4

0.20 -3.33 0.42 0.54 -0.40

1.94 -0.28 0.481.71 -0.17 0.07 -0.75 1.94-0.75 -1.28 -1.08

-0.11-1.57

0.83 1.48 1.36-0.99 -0.34 -0.81 -0.87 -0.58-0.40 0.60 -0.58 3.12 -0.110.48 0.18 0.18 -0.87 0.18-1.63 -0.99 4.17 -0.40 1.940.24 0.77 -0.07 16.02 0.18

12.0 6.0 12.4 12.6 11.0<50 <10

11.2 12.514.6 11.4

10.4

10.4 9.5

9.9 <50 11.5

<20 13.1

14.2 14.0

10.0

10.2 10.711.0 12.7

17.0 11.512.5 12.0

8.9 10.0 18.8 11.0 15.012.1

13.0 11.6

39.0

15.0

11.8

15.0

9.0

11.1 10.3

10.7

12.0 10.2 12.0

12.0

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =Hl =

11.71.746

12.710.4

100

Page 104: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 13. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample T-145 (trace constituents)-ContinuedZn (Zinc)

15.0

13.0

11.0

9.0

7.0

5.0

3.0

i

'- -

I

/-

rirtf

r£------- f

f

* ^0^^°^P A0^^

I J***?_ <^

j> -+

__________ ̂ _ ____________ _ V _

^O******* *^ J>*<*^V^v^'^ *L*j¥^_____ ________ ______ ^**t?__ _______

* r / -----------------

. AA: direct air 3. AA: graphite furnace \. ICP

Minimum = Maximum =

Median = F-pseudosigma =

Lab1 3 4 57

10 13 15 16 1823 24 26 28 3032 36 42 48 5859 68 69 70 7375 80 81 83 8687 89 96 97

102105 113 114 118 119121 128 132 133 134138 140 141 142 145

Rating Z-value3 0.59 2 -1.26 1 1.69 4 -0.13 4 0.420 2.53 4 -0.04 0 -2.11 4 -0.25

NRNR 4 0.08 4 -0.34 1 -1.69 4 -0.174 0.00 0 2.53 4 0.00

NR NR4 0.00 4 0.21

NR NR 2 1.264 0.42 0 -2.19 3 -0.84 4 -0.08 3 0.760 2.66 1 1.60 4 0.42

NR 3 -0.514 -0.42 3 -0.65

NR0 2.11 4 0.003 0.84 4 0.04 4 -0.42 4 0.04 3 0.713 -0.85 1 1.69 4 -0.04 3 -0.68 2 1.26

-0-1 -^

6. ICP/MS

13 7 36 14 5.0 0.6 0.0 8.0

66.0 13.8 20.0 14.5 14.0 8.3 9.9 9.7 3.7 3.7 1.7 1.51346

11.4 7.0

14.0 9.7

11.016.0

9.9 <5

9.4 <100

<20 10.2

9.2 6.0 9.6

10.0 16.0

10.0 <5

<5010.0

10.5 <50

<20 13.011.0

4.8 8.0

9.8 11.8

16.3 13.8

11.0 <4.6

8.89.0

8.5

15.0 10.012.0 10.1

9.0 10.1 11.7

8.0 14.0

9.9 8.4

13.0

MPV= 10.0 F-pseudosigma = 2.4

N= 70 Hu= 11.8 HI = 8.6

Lab Rating Z-value 1346146 NR < 20 151 4 -0.45 8.9 158 2 -1.18 7.2 180 4 -0.21 9.5 190 2 1.39 13.3191 3 -0.63 8.5 193 NR <50 196 1 1.90 14.5 204 2 -1.18 7.2 212 3 0.84 12.0213 1 1.69 14.0 215 0 -4.21 0.0 217 3 -0.89 7.9 219 4 0.42 11.0 220 4 0.00 10.0221 3 0.55 11.3 224 4 0.08 10.2 234 2 -1.38 6.7 235 3 -0.72 8.3 236 3 -0.59 8.6240 4 0.42 11.0 241 0 -2.11 5.0 245 4 -0.30 9.3 249 0 -3.96 0.6 253 0 4.22 20.0255 4 -0.14 9.7 257 4 -0.42 9.0 259 0 23.61 66.0 265 4 0.21 10.5 273 0 4.22 20.0274 1 -1.76 5.8

101

Page 105: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)

Definition of analytical methods, abbreviations, and symbols

Analytical methods0 Other/Not reported1 AA: direct, air2 AA: direct, N2O3 AA: graphite furnace4ICP5 DCP6 ICP/MS7 1C

12 Flame emission20 Titrate: color21 Titrate: electro22 Color:40 Ion electrode41 Electro50 Gravimetric51 Turbidimetric

Abbreviations and symbolsN

MPVF-pseudosigma

HuHI

W/Lmg/L

US/cmLabNR

<

ConstituentAlk Alkalinity as CaCO,B BoronCa CalciumCl ChlorideDSRD Dissolved solidsF FluorideK PotassiumMg MagnesiumNa Sodiumtotal P PhosphoruspHSiGj SilicaSO4 SulfateSp Con Specific ConductanceSr StrontiumV Vanadium

==s

==

====

=

=====

=

===

=====

=

=

atomic absorption: direct.airatomic absorption: direct.nitrous oxideatomic absorption: graphite furnaceinductively coupled plasmadirect current plasmamass spectrometry/inductively coupled plasmaion chromatographyflame emissiontitration: colorimetric [color reagent specified]titration: electrometriccolorimetric [color reagent specified]ion selective electrodeelectrometric: [type meter specified]gravimetric: [precipitate specified]turbidimetric: [precipitate specified]

number of samplesmost probable valuenonparametric statistic deviationupper hinge valuelower hinge valuemicrograms per litermilligrams per litermicrosiemens per centimeter at 25° Claboratory code numbernot rated, less than value reportedless than

page103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118

102

Page 106: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)-ContinuedAlkalinity (as CaC03) mg/L

n 20 -20br

0. Other 20. Titrate colorimetric20br. Titrate: bromcresol

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

21. Titrate: dectrometric 21h2S04 . Titrate: sulfuric acid22. Cotorimetric

5107136

15107310117

8

4108118

624

140114

3

12104120114

3

599

118

Lab Rating Z-value 20 20br 221 23 5710 11 13 15 1618 19 23 24 2526 32 33 36 3839 40 42 43 4648 5051 55 5657 59 68 697075 76 80 81 8385 87 89 90 9296 97 105107 109113 114 118 119 127

40 3 433 3 0 0 30 4 2 4 34 3 34 404 04 43 2 3 0 21 3 3 2 440 3 4 32 1 40 44 3 24 04 4 4 2 3

0.24 -2.80 0.58 -0.44 0.810.58 0.58 -2.12 -6.17 -0.54 113-2.12 0.24 -1.11 0.24 0.58-0.10 0.58 -0.57 0.24 0.41-4.82 -0.44 8.67 0.24 -0.37-0.77 1.25 0.58 -2.12 1.431.93 0.85 117 0.58 1.25 0.24-0.10 -2.12 -0.77 0.24 -0.57 113-1.11 1.93 -0.10 -3.92 -0.470.24 0.98 -1.04 -0.10 2.700.24 0.24 0.24-1.45 0.58

115 106 116 113 117

116 116 108 96

115 111 115 116114 116 113

115 116100 113 140 115 113

118 116 108 119

120

115114

108 112

115

111 120

114 103 113115

117 111

114 122115 115

115 110 116

108

112

116 118

-21ti2so4 X 22

MPVF-pseudosigma

NHuHl

1143

103116112

Lab Rating Z-value 20 20br 21 21ri2S04 22128 129 132 133 134138141 142 143145146 149 151 155 158180 190 191 193 203204212 213 215 217218 220 224 234 236240241 244 247 249255 256 257 258 259261 262 265 268 272273 274276

3 24 4 04 3 3 4 04 4 4 3 22 4 2 4023 3 3 30 3 0 3 434 4 0 04 0 4 0 41 0 0 200 0 2

0.58 1.25 -0.04 0.24 7.39 136-0.10 0.58 0.58 -0.44 -5.16-0.10 -0.10 -0.10 0.75 -1.11-1.11 0.24 1.25 -0.10 -3.23-1.11 -0.77 -0.77 -0.77 0.91-2.80 -0.64 -3.47 -0.77 0.04-0.81 0.41 0.24

-37.34 -2.46 107-0.44 -2.46 0.24 3.41-0.101.93 -2.09 7.32 1.25

66.003.27

38.561.02

118

114

117

118

112

107

124

120

136 310 310

229 117

116

114 115

114 116 116 113

99114

114

111111 115

114105111 112

112 112 117106112

104

114112

116 115

4

113

115

114

108

118

124

103

Page 107: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)-ContinuedB (Boron)

-22 X 22az * 22cu

4 ICP 6. ICP/MS22. CoJorimetic

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

22az. Colon azomethine 22cu. Color curcumin

3120.0

145.040.94.4

421.045.0

1 2210 51.0

55.0

260.085.0

MPV= 41.6F-pseudosigma = 5.2

N= 40Hu = 44.8Hl= 37.8

Lab Rating Z-value 22 22az 22cu1 3 5 10 1516 18 24 26 2842 46 48 50 5768 70 75 85 86

119 127 128 129 132134 138 141 142 145180 212 215 217 219234 235 236 240 255256 259 262 265 273

4 4 3 0 NR0 NR 3 2 20 001NR0 NR 4 4 44 41 0 44 3 3 4 23 3 4 4 43 3 4 0 0NR 0 0 4 0

0.38 0.26 0.55 3.56

3.87

-0.67 -1.23 -1.29-4.01 -3.91 -4.20 1.82

20.06

-0.14 -0.20 0.480.26 -0.44 -1.66 2.59 0.170.13-0.79 -0.80 -0.13 1.290.55 0.65 -0.32 -0.20 0.46-0.51 -0.71 -0.24 3.31 -3.74

8.42 -3.81 0.26 5.50

43.6 43.0 44.5

60.0 «=5061.6 «=50 38.2 35.3 35.0

21.0 21.5 20.0

51.0 <100145.0 «=50 40.9 40.6 44.143.0 39.4 33.1

55.0 42.542.3

37.6 37.5 41.0 48.344.5

45.0 40.0 40.6 44.039.0 38.0 40.4 58.7 22.4

<20 85.0

22.0 43.0

70.0

104

Page 108: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)~ContinuedCa (Calcium) mg/L

^*~ J

9 J> m/ ^ _f

..v^ ^r , -HJ 9 ^w^ooooocw mri &f T ._._ vy****** ~ _r60.0 -- /

f^t£p5

50.0 -

fP_____ /

J

^coo**00000**

IT

yyw*w4 f-t-

0. Other 4. ICP 1. AA: direct air 6. ICP/MS 2. AA: direct nitrous oxide 20. Titrate: colorimetric

N= 4 16 6 56 3 11 Minimum = 53.1 57.9 55.7 2.9 59.1 27.3

Maximum = 63.0 66.4 68.0 68.0 61.3 67.0 Median= 61.8 60.8 63.1

F-pseudosigma = 3.1 2.6 3.9Lab Rating

1 23 0 5 4

10 4 11 013 1 15 0 16 3 18 4 19 423 2 24 4 25 2 26 4 28 430 3 32 4 33 4 36 2 38 340 0 42 3 43 4 46 3 48 450 3 55 4 56 4 57 3 59 068 3 69 3 70 4 75 3 80 181 4 83 3 85 4 86 3 87 289 3 90 3 97 3

102 4 105 4107 3 109 3 113 1 119 4 121 4

Z-value 0 1 2 4 6 20-1.40 56.3 2.19 67.5

-0.27 59.8 -0.47 59.2

-18.50 2.91.52

-2.39 -0.66 -0.18 -0.11

65.4 53.2 58.6 60.1 60.3

1.49 65.3 -0.27 59.8 1.20 64.4 0.14 61.1 0.27 61.50.75 0.21

-0.47 59.2 -1.49 -0.82-2.26 0.85 0.11

-0.59 0.49

63.0 61.3

56.0 58.1

53.6 63.3 61.0 58.8 62.2

0.75 63.0 -0.47 59.2 0.36 61.8 0.75 63.0 2.35 68.00.75 63.0

-0.59 58.8 0.24 61.4

-0.79 58.2 1.71 66.0

-0.24 59.9 -0.72 58.4 0.46 62.1 0.62 62.6

-1.49 56.0-0.76 58.3 -0.72 58.4 -0.88 57.9 -0.08 60.4 0.11 61.0

-0.85 58.0 -0.63 58.7 1.71 66.0 0.14 61.1

-0.21 60.0

MPV = F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu = Hl =

Lab Rating Z-value 0 1128 4 0.43 129 4 0.43 62.0 132 3 -0.60 133 4 -0.31 134 4 0.13138 4 0.43 140 3 0.59 62.5 141 3 0.85 142 3 -0.53 145 3 0.67146 2 -1.20 151 4 0.17 155 4 0.00 180 4 -0.08 190 3 -0.66 58.6191 4 -0.50 204 4 -0.27 212 3 0.72 215 4 0.43 217 0 -3.22218 1 -1.58 219 3 -0.85 220 4 -0.21 60.0 221 1 1.84 66.4 224 1 1.68234 4 -0.02 235 1 1.87 236 4 -0.33 240 4 -0.40 241 3 0.75 63.0249 2 1.46 255 4 -0.01 256 3 0.82 257 0 2.35 258 1 2.05259 4 -0.34 261 2 1 .27 262 3 0.75 63.0 265 4 0.11 268 0 -2.21 53.85270 0 -2.41 53.1 271 3 0.79 272 0 -10.70 273 3 0.75 274 0 -6.50276 2 1.04

60.7 3.1 96

63.0 58.8

2 4 662.0

58.8 59.761.162.0

63.3 59.0 62.8

20

56.9 61.2

60.7 60.4

59.1 59.8 62.9 62.0 50.6

55.7 58.0

65.960.6 66.5 59.6 59.4

65.2 60.6

63.2 68.0

67.059.6 64.6

61.0

63.1 27.3

63.0 40.463.9

105

Page 109: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-14Q (major constituents)-ContinuedCl (Chloride) mg/L

30.0

0. Other 7. Ion chromatography20. Titrate: colorimetric

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

21 . Titrate: etectrometric 22. Colorimetric40. Ion selective electrode

327.027.6

4123235.825.5

1.2

2022.042.527.03.9

923.927.225.20.8

2723.529.026.20.6

419.626.2

Lab Rating Z-value 20 22 40123 4 57 10 11 13 1516 18 19 23 2425 26 30 32 3336 39 40 42 4346 48 50 51 5556 57 59 64 6869 70 75 76 8081 83 85 878996 97 102 105 107109 113 114 119 127

3 23 4 324 3 340 3 3 4 43 4 4 3 24 0 3 0 43 2 3 2 41 3 2 4 44 4 4 2 324 3 0 334 44 31 3 3 3 4

-0.78 1.35 0.64 0.16 -0.71-1.21 0.360.64 -0.71 0.432.18 28.9 0.85 -0.57 0.28 -0.14-0.85 0.28 -0.43 0.78-1.070.14 2.99 0.78 7.12 0.140.57 -1.28 -0.57 1.42 0.00-1.61 -0.57 -1.28 0.36 0.500.28 0.00 0.21 1.49 -0.57-1.35 -0.43 -0.57 2.28 -0.57-0.64 -0.07 -0.21 -0.43 1.00-1.78 -0.64 -0.57 -0.78 0.43

24.7 27.7

26.0 24.824.1

24.8 26.4

25.0

24.6 26.2 25.2 26.9 24.3

26.0 30.0

35.8

27.8

25.0 24.0 26.3

25.8

27.9 25.0

25.0

25.0

25.2

23.3 24.9

24.7 26.4

26.7

26.3 26.7

27.0

26.2 25.6

26.9

26.026.6 24.0 25.0

25.823.5

26.526.2

26.1

23.9 25.2

29.0

24.9 25.7 25.5

27.2

25.0

-21 -X-22 -40

MPV = F-pseudosigma :

N:

HIP Hh

Lab Rating Z-value

25.81.4103

26.925.0

20 22 40128 129 133 134 138140 141 142 143 145146 149 151 158 180183 190 191 196 203204 212 213 215 217220 221 224 234 236240 241 247 249 253255 256 257 258 259261 262 265 268 271272 273 274 276

4 3 0 3 43 4 4 4 33 3 3 3 31 0 4 1 24 4 3 2 43 4 2 2 020 4 0 241 4 0 31 4 4 4 30 3 0 0

-0.28 -0.57 -4.41 0.70 0.070.68 -0.14 -0.46 0.43 -0.630.85 0.85 -0.57 -0.64 -0.851.72 2.06 0.21 -1.85 -1.21-0.36 0.28 0.78 -1.28 0.070.71 -0.28 1.26 -1.28 2.30-1.35 -2.71 -0.07 3.42 -1.140.36 1.72 0.14 4.56 -0.57-1.64 -0.07 -0.21 -0.14 0.85

11.92 0.85 11.00 6.91

25.4 25.0

19.6 26.8 25.9

2S.8 25.6 252 26.4

24.927.0

27.0 25.0

24.9 24.6

28.2 28.7 26.1 23.2

24.125.3

26.2 26.9 24.0

25.926.8

25.4 27.6

24.0 29.023.9

22.0 25.7

30.6 24.2

26.3 28.2

26.0 32.2

25.023.5

25.7 25.5 25.6

27.042.5

27.0 41.3 35.5

106

Page 110: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)-ContinuedDSRD (Dissolved solids) mg/L

420 410400 -390 - 380 - 370 -

360 350 340 330 -

___________ _______ _ _ _J".-mULJWr

- rf

n01 3°^ancHJUL

n so50. Gravimetric

N = Minimum = Maximum =

Medial = F-pseudosigma =

Lab1 3 5

10 1113 15 16 18 1923 25 26 32 3638 40 43 50 5557 59 69 70 7576 80 81 85 8789 90 92 96 97

105 109 113 114 118119 127 129 134 138140 141 142 143 146

Rating3 34 4 14 3 3 3 43 3 4 314 4 4 4 44 3 2 4 331 0 4 03 1 4 2 124 3 4 334 4 3 34 4 3 34

Z-value-0.75 -0.75 0.25 0.25

-1.510.38

-0.94 -0.63 0.94

-0.50-0.69 -0.88 -0.25 -0.63 1.76

-0.25 -0.25 0.25 0.00

-0.130.50

-0.69 1.19 0.19 1.001.00 1.82 2.64

-0.25 -2.130.75 1.76

-0.50 1.251.51

-1.07 0.31 0.88

-0.44 1.00

-0.75 0.31

-0.19 0.94

-0.88-0.31-0.38 0.69 1.00

-0.50

MPV= 382 F-pseudosigma = 16

67 N = 67 0 Hu = 396

424 HI = 374 382

050 Lab Rating Z-value 50

370 151 4 -0.25 378 370 155 3 0.95 397 386 158 4 0.38 388 386 190 0 -23.94 0 358 212 1 -1.76 354388 215 4 -0.44 375 367 217 4 -0.06 381 372 221 3 0.88 396 397 224 4 -0.11 380 374 234 4 0.00 382371 236 4 0.19 385 368 240 4 -0.13 380 378 241 0 -6.15 284 372 253 2 1.38 404 410 255 4 0.13 384378 257 3 0.82 395 378 259 4 0.13 384 386 382 380390 371 401 385 398398 411 424 378 348394 410 374 402 406365 387 396 375 398370 387 379 397 368377 376 393 398 374

107

Page 111: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)~ContinuedF (Fluoride) mg/L

0.62 --

0.57

0.52 --

0.47 --

0.42

X 21 -X-22 -40

7. Ion chromatography 10. AA: extraction21. Titrate: etectrometric

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

22. Cotorimetric 40. Ion selective electrode

110.460.920.530.08

1 1 1 570.43 0.52 0.76 0.08

2.000.530.04

Lab Rating Z-value 10 22 40

MPV = 0.530F-pseudosigma = 0.037

N= 71Hu = 0.560HI = 0.510

1 237 1011 13 15 16 1823 24 25 26 3236 39 40 46 4650 55 57 59 6970 76 80 81 8389 96 97 105 107109 113 114 119 127128 129 134 138140141 142 145 146 149

31 1 0 43 3 4 4 33 3 3 2014 3 4 04 4 4 3 224 3 4 00 4 3 3 41 4 4 4 24 0 1 4 02 1 1 3 4

0.81 1.62 1.86 4.05 0.680 -0.27-0.81 -0.54 -0.24 0.38 -0.540.70 0.81 -0.54 1.08 0.570 -2.67-1.70 0.27 -0.65 -0.19 4.320.00 -0.27 -0.27 0.54 1.351.35 0.32 -0.54 0.22 3.24

-12.03 -0.13 -0.94 0.54 0.550 -0.081.62 -0.13 0.00 0.00 -1.46 0.476-0.27 0.520 3.10 0.645 1.62 0.03 -2.401.08 1.97 -1.89 0.460 0.73 0.00 0.530

0.560 0.590 0.599

0.5200.500 0.510 0.521 0.544 0.5100.556 0.560 0.510

0.4310.467 0.540 0.506 0.523 0.6900.530 0.520 0.520 0.550 0.5800.580 0.542 0.510 0.538 0.6500.084 0.525 0.495

0.5270.590 0.525 0.530 0.530

0.590 0.531 0.4410.570 0.603

0.557

Lab Rating Z-value 10 22151 158 190 196 212215 217 224 234 240241 247 255 257 258259 262 265 272 273

3 4 4 4 33 0 0 2 41 3 3 3 33 3 4 0 0

-0.54 0.27

-0.24 0.521 -0.13 -0.54-0.81 -2.97 10.52 0.920 -1.21 0.485 0.131.62

-0.54 0.510 0.70 0.81

-0.54-0.81 -0.76 -0.27 39.66 -2.70 0.430

0.511 0.541

0.525 0.5110.501 0.421

0.53"0.591

0.55S 0.561 0.5100.5C1 0.5C2 0.521 2.001

274 6.21 0.760

108

Page 112: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-1 40 (major constituents)~ContinuedK (Potassium) mg/L

2.90 --

2.30 --

2.10 -1 CD

1. AA: direct air 4. ICP5. DCP

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

6.7.

ICP/MS Ion chromatography

12. Flame emission26

ZOO3.202.570.09

43 1Z20 2.624.202.580.16

32.532.68

22.582.68

122.353.912.830.39

Lab Rating Z-value 12123 5

1013 15 16 18 1923 24 26 28 3233 36 38 40 4243 46 48 50 5156 57 59 64 6869 70 80 81 8385 86 87 89 97

102 105 107 109 113119 121 127 128 129

4 0 2 2 41 1 3 0 43 3 3 1 44 0 4 4 34 0 4 3 40 0 NR 3 01 3 0 4 40 4 3 2 41 4 2 4 23 4 4 43

-0.07 -3.41 -1.07 -1.49 0.00-1.99 -1.56 -0.57 -2.70 0.140.71 -0.92 0.71 -1.85 -0.360.28 -3.41 0.28 0.43 0.850.14 -2.340.00 -0.57 -0.143.12 4.40

0.71 2.271.70 -0.71 -4.12 -0.36 0.142.63 0.43 -0.78 -1.42 0.14-1.99 0.21 1.21 -0.14 1.35-0.57 -0.14 -0.36 0.00 -0.57

2.57 2.10

2.58

2.50

2.68

2.10 2.62

3.02 3.20

2.68

2.00

2.95

2.47 2.38 2.60

2.75

2.56

2.50

2.43 2.37

2.30 2.36

2.20 2.60

2.45 2.68

2.32 2.53

2.62

2.64 2.702.60 2.25 2.58 2.50

2.56

<5

2.902.82

2.48

2.53 2.60

2.64

2.30 2.61

2.56 2.772.50

2.53 2.58

-12

MPV = F-pseudosigma :

Hu = Hh

2.580.14

872.692.50

Lab Rating Z-value132 134 138 140 141142 145 146 151 180190 191 212 215 217218 219220 221 224234 235 236 241 249255 256 257 258 259261 262 265 268 270271 272 273 274

3 4 4 4 41 4 0 3 24 4 3 1 02 1 4 4 04 0 1 4 34 0 0 2 31 1 4 1 03 0 1 0

0.57 -0.28 2.54 0.07 0.00 2.58 -0.07-1.99 -0.28 4.54 0.71 -1.140.00 -0.14 -0.57 1.56

11.50-1.21 2.41 1.56 0.14 2.60 0.21 2.61 3.690.43

11.15 -1.92 -0.14 2.56 0.710.28 9.44 5.11 1.21 -0.57 2.50-1.63 1.78 -0.43 2.52 1.93 2.85 4.47-0.57 2.98 1.56 3.55

2.66

2.59

2.572.30 2.54 3.22

2.42

2.50 2.80 4.20

2.80

3.102.64 4.15 2.31

2.62

2.80

2.68

2.58 2.56

2.68

3.91 3.30 2.75

2.35 2.83

3.212.50 3.00

3.08

109

Page 113: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)-ContinuedMg (Magnesium) mg/L

21.0

0. Other 1. AA direct air2. AA direct nitrous oxide

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

4. ICP 6. ICP/MS20. Titrate: colorimetric

616.6021.40

2110.9519.2718.000.85

49.80

17.80

560.50

22.7618.18

1.11

318.1019.98

610.3730.79

Lab Rating Z-value 201 2 3 5 1011 13 15 16 1819 23 24 25 2628 30 32 33 3638 40 4243 4648 50 51 55 5657 59 68 69 7075 80 81 83 8586 87 89 97 102105 107 109 113 119

3 20 340 2 0 4 44 4 4 2 24 2 0 4 24 2 2 2 34 4 0 2 20 0 4 344 24 344 34 4 13 4 41 3

-0.63 -1.04 2.71 -0.94 0.42

-18.23 1.04 -2.08 -0.21 -0.020.42 0.00 0.10 1.25 1.250.21 -1.04 2.06 -0.21 17.8 -1.040.14 -1.25 1.35 1.04 -0.820.31 0.00 -7.34 1.46 1.322.08 2.60 0.00 -0.52 0.100.42 -1.04 0.21 -0.83 0.310.10 -0.83 0.21 0.00 1.980.83 -0.31 -0.42 1.98 0.63

17.0

18.4

18.0

17.018.1

11.0

19.3

17.5

18.4 17.0

18.3

17.2 18.2 18.0

17.7

17.4

20.6 17.1

0.5 19.0 16.0 17.8 18.018.4

18.1 19.2 19.218.2

17.0 20.0

16.8 19.3 19.0 17.218.3 18.0

19.4

20.0 20.5 18.0

18.1

18.2 17.2

18.1

19.918.8

17.6 19.9 18.6

MPV =F-pseudoskjma :

N =Hu =Hh

18.01.096

18.617.3

Lab Rating Z-value 20121 127 128 129132133 134 138 140 141142 145 146 151 155180 190 191 204 212215 217 218 219 220221 224 234 235 236240 241 255 256 257258 259 261 262 265268 271 272 273 274276

4 3 3 4 42 4 3 3 34 4 44 44 44 0 13 0 4 244 0 4 2 24 0 4 202 23 0 430 0 0 00

-0.31 0.63 -0.83 0.00 18.0 -0.21-1.15 -0.13 0.52 0.52 18.5 0.83-0.17 -0.20 -0.42 0.10 0.320.42 -0.21 17.8 0.42

-17.64 1.770.63 -2.50 -0.32 1.04 0.00 18.00.10 18.1 4.96 -0.42 1.46 1.24-0.42 -4.17 14.0 0.17 -1.46 16.6 -8.54-1.46 16.6 -1.04 17.0 -0.63 3.54 21.4 -0.21-0.52 17.5 -7.95 -4.85 2.81 13.32-2.08

17.7 18.6 17.2

17.816.9 17.9 18.5

18.817.8 17.8 17.6

1f 1

18.4

18.4 1.1

19.718.6 15.6

17.7 19.0

22.8 17.6 19.4 19.217.6

18.2

9.8

17.8

20.7

18.3

17.4

10.413.3

30.816.0

110

Page 114: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)~ContinuedNa (Sodium) mg/L

45.0

1. AA: direct air4. ICP 5. DCP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS7. Ion chromatography 12. Flame emission

2434.450.838.1

2.2

511.5

48.339.6

1.8

1 338.2 38.5

42.6

1 1239.3 20.6

50.038.7

3.9Lab Rating Z-value 12

123 5

1011 1315 16 1819 23 24 25 2628 32 33 36 3840 42 43 46 4850 51 56 57 5964 68 69 70 7580 81 83 85 8687 89 97 102 105107 109 113 119 121

4 0 0 4 40 2 0 4 420 4 1 31 4 40 034 3 4 43 4 0 1 03 34 4 424 4 4 23 4 3 0 34 4 1 4 4

-0.42 -2.08 -2.33 0.31 -0.10

-19.47 1.14 -2.33 -0.26 -0.011.14 -2.18-0.10 1.92 0.991.920.26 -0.42 -2.08 -2.39-0.99 0.10 0.52 0.31 0.420.52 -0.10 6.12 -1.56 2.85-0.57 0.78 -0.21 0.21 -0.31-1.04 0.05 -0.47 0.42 1.14-0.88 -0.42 0.57 -3.01 0.930.31 -0.23 -1.61 0.47 -0.05

35.0

38.8

34.8

35.0 34.4

50.8

37.9

38.437.0

39.8

37.3 38.2 40.1

39.6

38.2

34.5 39.6

1.5 41.234.5 38.5 39.041.2

38.8 42.7 40.942.7

39.5 38.2

37.1 39.2 40.0 39.6 39.840.0

38.8

36.0 44.5

40.5 38.6

39.4

39.1 38.1

41.2

33.2 40.8

38.6 35.9 39.9 38.9

12

MPV= 39.0F-pseudosigma = 1.9

N= 92Hu = 40.3Hl= 37.7

Lab Rating Z-value 12127 128129 132 134138 140 141 142 145146 151 180 190 191212 215 217 218 219220 221 224 234 235236 241 249 255 256257 258 259 261 262265 268 270 271 272273 274

4 4 24 44 0 3 4 21 1 4 4 41 2 0 1 41 4 2 4 04 2 4 4 243 4 0 34 30 0 00 0

0.00 -0.47 -1.040.13 0.140.36 5.19 0.83 0.30 1.081.66 1.87 0.47 0.16 -0.261.76 1.30 -2.18 -1.56 0.00-1.56 0.42 1.08 0.10 4.83-0.43 -1.04 0.05 -0.17 -1.020.00 -0.78 0.00 3.58 -0.78-0.47 0.91 4.09 -2.59 5.712.70 -9.55

37.0

39.3

49.0

36.0

36.0 39.8

37.0

39.0

38.1 40.8

39.0 38.1

39.3

39.7

40.6 39.6 41.142.2

39.9

42.441.5 34.8

39.0

41.1 39.2 48.338.2

38.7

44.2

42.6

39.3 38.5

39.1

37.039.0 37.5

45.9 37.5

46.9 34.0 50.0

20.6

111

Page 115: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituent-Continued total P as P (total Phosphorus as Phosphorus) mg/L

0.06 -

0.05 -

0.04

0.03

0.02

0.01 -

0.00 -

J " " j> f ,***

A / VVV-alt''* IB / »-.^^~* ^

XX JUK*

X

.6 -X-22 -X-22m

0. Other 4. ICP6. ICP/MS

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

22. Colorimetric 22m. Cotorphosphomolybdate22snd. Color stanous chloride

20.050.050.050.00

20.040.050.050.00

10.030.030.030.00

80.020.710.040.00

430.010.100.030.00

10.040.040.040.00

Lab Rating Z-vaiue 22123

11 1516 18 22 23 3238 39 48 55 5759 64 6870 8183 87 89 92 97

102 105 107 113 114118 119 127 129 132133 134 138 140 141142 143 145 146 155158 180 190 191 212

4 1 4 2

NR1 4 4 4 14 40 3 33 4 1

NR4

NR4 44 00 24 4424

NR 4 44 4 4

NR NR2 4 4

NR 43 1 1 4 3

-0.18 1.80

-0.18 1.17

1.71 0.051 -0.45 0.00 0.18 1.58 0.0500.00 0.18 3.42

-0.72 0.720.72

-0.18 1.80

-0.36<100

-0.36 -0.27 -0.45 -2.70-2.25 -1.17 -0.36 -0.36 -0.09-1.08 -0.18

-0.45 -0.18-0.36 -0.18 0.00

-1.08 0.09 0.27

-0.240.81 1.80 1.62 0.18 0.99

0.030 0.052

0.030 0.045 <0.05

0.027 0.032 0.034

0.032 0.034

0.070 0.024 0.0400.040 0.030

0.052 <0.1 0.028

0.028 0.029 0.027

< 0.0020.007

0.019 0.028 0.028 0.0310.020 0.030 <0.01 0.027 0.0300.028 0.030 0.032

<0.02 <0.050.020 0.033 0.035 <0.1 0.0290.041 0.052 0.050

0.034 0.043

-22snd

MPV= 0.032F-pseudosigma = 0.011

N= 57Hu= 0.043HI = 0.028

22m 22sncl Lab Rating Z-value 22 22m 22snd213 215 224 234 235236 240 241 243 249257 258 259 273 274

2 3 4 4 13 3 4 4 10 0 3 0 0

-1.08 0.72

-0.18 -0.18 1.620.72

-0.90 0.00

-0.18 1.626.12

10.02 0.72

60.97 9.80

0.020 O.C40 O.C30 O.C30

0.0500.040

O.C22 O.C32 O.C30 O.C500.100

0.143 0.040

0.710 0.141

112

Page 116: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)-ContinuedPH

8.70 8.60 8.50 8.40 8.30 8.20 8.10 8.00 7.90 7.80

'--

; ^^^rTTrrrrTTTT<3a3fc^ aTrfljJiiiTf i^rnvtgus&SXERR* t " i ' I3J-

:! /r^oS&*fff*rjR^

jjrrcLU"**^

O 41

41. Direct reading

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

1 2 3 57

1011 13 15 1618 19 23 24 2526 30 32 33 363839 40 424346 48 50 51 5556 57 59 64 6869 70 75 76 8081 85 86 87 8992 96 97

105107109 113 114 118 119

Rating Z-value4 -0.42 2 -1.44 0 -2.70 3 -0.66 4 -0.483 0.84 4 -0.12 4 0.48 2 -1.02 2 -1.084 -0.18 1 1.62 4 0.00 4 -0.48 4 0.484 0.30 3 0.72 3 0.72 4 0.00 4 0.303 0.72 3 0.72 4 0.42 0 -2.28 4 -0.423 0.60 1 -1.68 4 0.18 4 0.06 1 -1.684 0.42 4 -0.48 3 0.72 3 0.60 3 0.603 0.72 4 0.00 4 -0.06 4 -0.12 3 -0.663 0.54 3 0.54 4 0.42 1 -1.98 3 0.663 -0.84 4 0.36 3 0.54 4 0.36 2 1.263 0.84 4 0.24 2 -1.26 0 -2.28 2 1.32

108 7.42 8.56 8.280.17

418.21 8.04 7.83 8.17 8.208.42 8.26 8.36 8.11 8.108.25 8.55 8.28 8.20 8.368.33 8.40 8.40 8.28 8.338.40 8.40 8.35 7.90 8.218.38 8.00 8.31 8.29 8.008.35 8.20 8.40 8.38 8.388.40 8.28 8.27 8.26 8.178.37 8.37 8.35 7.95 8.398.14 8.34 8.37 8.34 8.498.42 8.32 8.07 7.90 8.50

MPV= 8.28 F-pseudoskjma = 0.17

N= 108 Hu = 8.37 Hl= 8.15

Lab Rating Z-value 41127 4 0.18 8.31 128 3 0.90 8.43 129 1 -1.74 7.99 132 2 -1.38 8.05 133 3 -0.78 8.15134 3 0.96 8.44 138 4 0.06 8.29 140 4 0.30 8.33 141 4 0.42 8.35 142 4 -0.12 8.26143 3 0.60 8.38 145 4 0.12 8.30 146 3 -0.78 8.15 149 3 0.72 8.40 151 3 0.66 8.39155 4 -0.24 8.24 158 4 -0.12 8.26 180 3 0.72 8.40 183 4 0.30 8.33 190 2 -1.08 8.10191 3 0.66 8.39 203 4 0.18 8.31 204 3 -0.72 8.16 212 4 0.12 8.30 213 4 0.42 8.35215 4 -0.18 8.25 217 3 0.72 8.40 218 1 -1.56 8.02 221 2 -1.20 8.08 224 3 -0.66 8.17234 3 -0.90 8.13 236 4 -0.24 8.24 240 4 -0.24 8.24 241 4 0.12 8.30 243 0 -2.22 7.91244 4 0.36 8.34 247 1 1.68 8.56 249 1 -1.80 7.98 253 4 -0.48 8.20 255 2 1.26 8.49256 2 -1.38 8.05 257 4 -0.42 8.21 258 4 -0.48 8.20 259 2 1.32 8.50 261 1 -1.98 7.95262 0 -5.16 7.42 265 3 -0.96 8.12 268 2 -1.08 8.10 271 0 -2.70 7.83 272 4 0.00 8.28273 4 -0.48 8.20 274 0 -2.28 7.90 276 0 -3.48 7.70

113

Page 117: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-1 40 (major constituents)-ContinuedSi02 (Silca) mg/L

8.45 ;. ^ J7.95 '-_

7.45 -- |

; _!_____ ^$4-=| £»**^-/-"

2. AA: direct nitrous oxide 4. ICP 5. DCP

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab Rating Z-value

1 3 -1.00 3 0 2.35 5 3 -0.59

10 4 -0.11 13 4 0.0415 2 1.35 18 4 0.20 23 3 0.87 24 3 0.89 25 0 8.0326 4 0.39 32 4 0.33 33 3 -0.54 38 4 -0.13 40 4 -0.3742 2 1.41 43 4 0.33 46 3 -0.67 50 4 -0.11 55 4 0.0257 4 0.11 59 3 0.76 68 3 -0.65 70 3 -0.54 80 0 -4.0381 4 -0.24 83 2 -1.28 85 4 -0.07 87 4 -0.37 89 2 -1.2097 4 0.04

102 2 -1.50 105 4 0.22 107 4 -0.30 113 4 -0.02118 4 0.26 119 3 -0.76 121 4 -0.50 127 4 -0.30 128 3 0.96129 2 1.31 134 4 0.25 138 4 -0.46 140 4 0.11 142 0 2.31145 2 1.31 151 0 -3.20 155 3 -0.58 190 3 0.76 191 0 2.96

X*00***^*

**-TTT.... _

^^6. ICP/MS 22. Cdorimetric 22mb. Color molybdate blue

2 30 1 2 5.50 4.66 7.10 7.50 7.68 11.04 8.71

7.43 0.61

24566.89 8.43 7.08

7.37

7.76 11.047.53

7.50 7.10

7.188.00 7.50

7.367.40

5.50

6.76

7.45

7.00 7.12 7.21 7.79

7.47

8.417.95

8.71

<f I x* ?*

A \S wwMfvl

^^ ^K

/

K- 4 A 5 * 6 X 22 JK 22mb

i

F-pseudo 6 25

6.65 5.88 14.93 7.95

7.29 0.00

22 22mb Lab Rating Z-value 2203 3 -0.98 204 4 0.15 212 2 1.20

7.30 215 1 1.59 217 0 -2.76

7.97 219 4 0.33 7.44 234 4 -0.33 7.75 235 1 1.98

236 0 -5.85 240 2 -1.02241 3 0.72 7.68 255 4 0.07 256 1 -1.52

7.29 259 3 -0.76 265 2 -1.09274 0 16.49

7.04 7.30

7.70 7.05

7.10

7.24

7.32 7.18 6.807.37 6.66

7.21 7.34

7.47

7.95

7.14 7.40

5.88 7.08 7.70

yfaR**

KXX*****^

MPV = 7.35 sigma = 0.46

N= 66 Hu = 7.70 HI = 7.08

4 5 6 22 22mb6.90 7.42

7.90 8.08 6.087.50 7.20 8.26 4.66 6.88

7.38 6.65

7.00 6.85

14.93

114

Page 118: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)~ContinuedS04 (Sulfate) mg/L

165^

160 \

155 '-

150;

145 I

140 i

135 ^

IVI '

C

-/____________ I I1 *jf x £ j

' AAAlA ' «i* ^^/ A AA

. lt<A4Ailil"'MM*l""~"^AAA^M*^ ***^

/ MM/" P^^1 j*» _p _jmx <#& _F JT^ -

~r* n -^*__ _____ - -. .....-J *r _y ^1 J

0 A 7 X 22 -

). Other '. Ion chromatography 2. Coiorimetric

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

1 2 3 4 57

10 11 13 1516 18 19 23 2425 26 30 32 3336 39 40 42 4346 48 50 51 5556 57 59 64 6970 75 80 81 8385 87 89 92 9697

102 105 109 113

Rating4 4 24 43 4 0 4 224 4 2 44 4 4 3 424 0 0 40 0 4 3 04 2 4 4 234 0 3 44 0 4 4 34 2 2 3 3

Z-value0.03 0.30

-1.20 0.34 0.150.67 0.15

-21.75 0.00

-1.50-1.03-0.30 -0.15 1.20 0.00

-0.30 0.00 0.00

-0.60 -0.421.50 0.00

-4.65 7.04 0.005.25

-6.89 -0.15 0.82

-2.55-0.13 -1.50 -0.30 0.10 1.20

-0.60 0.45

-3.00 -0.75 0.15

-0.30 -3.45 -0.30 -0.39 -0.750.45

-1.05 -1.50 0.78 0.60

22mtb. Colon methyl thymol blue 50. Gravimetric SlTurbidimetric

6 51 2 17 4 18 16 5 150 120 143 17

174 197 158 168 152 200 150 149 149

5 7 110 7 22 22mtt> 50 51

150 152

142 152 151155

151 5

150 140

143 148 149

158 150

148 150 150 146 147

160 150 119 197

150185

104 149

156 133

149 140

148 151'

158146

153 130

145 151

148127

148 147 145

153 143

140 155 154

J. 1i-X 22mtb -D-50 -> 51

MPV= 150 F-pseudosigma = 7

N= 98 Hu= 155 Hl= 146

Lab Rating Z-value 0 7 22 22mtb 50114 4 0.30 119 2 -1.05 143 127 2 1.35 159 128 3 0.75 155 129 4 0.00 150134 4 0.30 152 138 4 -0.15 149 140 3 0.75 155 141 3 0.90 142 1 1.95 163145 4 -0.18 149 146 3 0.75 149 2 1.50 160 151 4 0.15 151 158 4 0.30 152180 2 -1.50 140 190 0 4.05 177 191 4 -0.15 149 193 4 -0.15 149 196 3 -0.75 145203 0 2.70 168 204 3 0.75 155 212 3 0.90 156 215 3 0.75 217 2 1.20 158219 0 -16.49 40 220 4 -0.34 221 3 -0.60 146 224 4 0.32 152 234 4 0.45 153235 0 3.60 174 236 4 0.34 152 240 4 -0.45 147 241 4 0.30 247 2 -1.08 143249 2 -1.39 253 0 -4.95 255 0 -4.50 120 256 3 0.65 154 257 0 6.75 195258 0 7.46 259 4 -0.30 148 261 0 -20.13 16 262 4 0.00 150 265 3 0.75 155268 3 0.55 154 271 0 -20.01 274 4 -0.09

I

51152

156

155

155

148

152

141 117

200

17 149

115

Page 119: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)-ContinuedSpCond (Specific Conductance)

640-

620 -

600-

580-

560 -

540-

_______________________________________ _ -J-~-^^t ^JQQQu^y33^ _--___-__

J_J -=ff^

-OP-**^ -"-- ------- ffOj-crf»^^^

-^.-0-4,

1 Other 41. Direct reading MPV= 600

F-pseudosigma = 19 N= 1 99 N= 100

Minimum = 620 70 Hu= 612 Maximum = 719 Hl= 587

Median = 600 F-pseudosigma = 19

Lab1 2 3 57

10 11 13 15 1618 19 23 24 2526 32 33 36 3839 40 42 43 4648 50 51 55 5657 59 64 68 7075 80 81 86 8789 90 92 96 97

102 105 107 109113

Rating4 3 4 3 14 4 4 4 41 0 1 4 44 4 1 0 33 4 4 4 44 2 22 40 3 3 4 33 4 4 2 03 0 4 3 20 3 4 43

Z-value 0 41 Lab Rating Z-value 0 410.02 600 114 4 0.43 608

-0.76 586 118 3 -0.54 590 0.43 608 119 4 -0.16 597 0.65 612 127 4 -0.27 595

-1.56 571 128 3 0.81 6150.32 606 129 3 -0.97 582

-0.16 597 132 0 -7.72 457 0.43 608 134 4 0.32 606

-0.05 599 138 4 -0.16 597 -0.12 598 140 0 5.83 708-2.00 563 141 4 0.38 607 3.56 666 142 4 0.22 604

-1.73 568 145 3 0.81 615 0.00 600 146 4 -0.27 595 0.38 607 149 3 0.65 6120.32 606 151 4 0.11 602 0.05 601 155 1 1.67 631

-1.56 571 158 4 0.49 609 -28.60 70 180 2 1.08 620

0.65 612 183 0 -3.51 535-0.86 584 190 4 0.22 604 0.43 608 193 1 -1.73 568 0.22 604 203 4 -0.11 598 0.00 600 204 4 -0.32 594

-0.05 599 212 1 2.00 6370.43 608 215 2 -1.40 574 1.19 622 217 2 1.35 625

-1.08 580 218 0 -2.37 556 1.35 625 224 0 -2.16 560

-0.14 597 234 3 0.59 6113.24 660 236 3 -0.59 589

-0.66 588 240 2 -1.30 576 0.70 613 241 0 -10.03 414 0.43 608 243 4 -0.27 595

-0.70 587 244 4 0.00 6000.54 610 247 4 -0.27 595 0.00 600 249 3 0.92 617 0.00 600 253 2 1.35 625 1.30 624 255 4 -0.27 595

-15.11 320 257 4 0.00 600-0.59 589 258 0 -3.29 539 -2.59 552 259 4 0.49 609 -0.17 597 261 0 -4.21 522 0.97 618 262 3 -0.97 582 1.35 625 268 0 -2.16 5606.42 719 271 0 -2.97 545 0.81 615 272 0 2.43 645

-0.49 591 273 2 1.08 620 -0.49 591 274 1 1.83 634 -0.54 590 276 0 -2.70 550

116

Page 120: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)-ContinuedSr (Strontium)

0. Other 1. AA: direct air2. AA: direct nitrous oxide

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

4. 5.6.

2578958

ICP OCRICP/MS

2 1680 673693

3317

78466832

1 4685 1

710

Lab Rating Z-value

MPV = F-pseudosigma =

Hl =

6713143

693652

13 5

11 1618 23 24 25 2832 33 40 425568 70 81 85 8697 102 105 113 121127 134 138 142 145151 190 191 212 217218 219 234 235 236259 265 273

40 4023 3 41 44 4 3 4 34 4 41 40 1 0 4 42 3 4 3 32 0 0 4 04 3 4 2 34 40

-0.15 3.67 -0.03

-21.27 -1.40-0.68 0.72 0.16 1.92 0.000.26 0.46 -0.68 -0.49 -0.880.13 0.07 -0.29 1.53

-0.16-3.02 1.98 -3.80 0.29 0.23-1.30 -0.57 -0.42 0.73 0.911.27 9.33

-21.79 -0.36 -3.020.07 0.94 -0.10 1.24 -0.730.29 -0.42 3.22

666 784 670 17

628650

693 676 730 671

685 650 656 644675 673 662 718 666

578 732 554 680 678631 654 658 694 699

958

578673

700 668 709649

680 658 770

679

710

1 660

117

Page 121: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 14. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample M-140 (major constituents)-ContinuedV (Vanadium)

13.00

-6 -X-22

2. AA: direct nitrous oxide3. AA: graphite furnace4. 1CP

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

135

1315161823262842485768708185868997

105127134138141142145146180212219224234235236241255257265

Rating34

NRNRNR3

NRNRNR0

NRNRNR0

NRNRNR3

NRNRNR3

NRNRNR44

NR34314

NR43303

Z-vatoe-0.67-0.14

0.59

2.25

15.48

0.77

-0.67

0.000.43

0.51-0.44-0.801.62

-0.47

0.13-0.80-0.6711.82-0.74

6. ICP/MS22. Cotorimetric0. Other

1 2 1139.00 1.00 1.00

1.40 50.004.703.34

234

3.00<4

<50< 10

<5<5

<410.20

<200<10050.00<50<3

<205.73

< 10<0

< 131.40

< 1

< 10

4.70< 104.95

1.008.302.02<5

3.801.00

1.4039.00

41.205.19

6

5.19

<5

<2

3.42

2.10

1.20

,1.40

221.40

MPV'

F-pseudosigma N:

Hi]'

Hl =

3.423.01

195.461.40

118

Page 122: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 15. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-51 (nutrients)

Definition of analytical methods, abbreviations, and symbols_______________ __ __

Analytical methods0. Other/Not reported4. ICP5. DCP 7. 1C

20. Titrate: color21. Titrate: electro22. Color:40. Ion electrode

inductively coupled plasmadirect coupled plasmaion chromatographytitration: colorimetric (color reagent specified)tit ration: electrrnetriccolorimetric [color reagent specified]ion selective electrode

Abbreviations and symbolsN =

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

Hu =Hl =

mg/L =Lab =NR =

number of samplesmost probable valuenonparametric statistic deviationupper hinge valuelower hinge valuemilligrams per literlaboratory code numbernot rated, less than value reportedless than

Constituent NH3 as N NH3+Org N as N

Total P as P PO4 as P

Ammonia as nitrogen Ammonia plus organic nitrogen Nitrate plus nitrite as nitrogen Total Phosphorus as phosphorus Orthophosphate as phosphorus

page120121122123124

119

Page 123: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 15. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference watersample N-51(nutrientconstituent-ContinuedNH 3 asN (Ammonia as nitrogen) mg/L

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

r AS ?** A

/ . _/__ t _______________________ _ ^^*»*«*1 yXX / ^

^'_____ .A^C^^O^

#"x**^ -J

j* __»**^

^ <y^O^^<^^

0 X 22 22nitro |

3. Other 22. Cotorimetric 22ni_o. Color nitroprusside

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

1 257

1011 13 15 16 1821 23 25 28 3338 39 48 53 5556 58 59 64 6870 80 81 83 8587 88 89 90 9196 97

104 105 110114 118 119 127 128129 132 133 134 138

Rating Z-value3 -0.85 4 -0.39 1 1.54 2 1.16 4 0.391 1.93

NR NR 4 0.25 2 1.412 -1.23

NR 4 0.19 0 5.20 3 -0.642 -1.21 3 0.58 3 0.77 3 0.83 3 0.873 -0.58 3 -0.77 4 -0.39 4 -0.19 1 1.54

NR NR NR NR 3 -0.714 0.00 4 -0.50 3 -1.00 4 0.13

NR4 0.31 3 0.56 2 -1.18 4 0.19 4 0.48

NR 3 -0.58 3 -0.77 3 -1 .00 3 0.77

NR -1.35 4 0.19 4 0.10 4 -0.50 3 -0.87

22n. Color Nessterization 22p. Color phenate 40. Ion selective electrode

2 5 1 2 39 10 0.08 0.07 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.19 0.15 0.11 0.34 0.09

0.06 0.05 0.06 0.03

0 22 22nitro 22n 22p 400.03

0.05 0.15

0.13 0.09

0.17 <0.02 <0.05

0.08 0.140.01

0.08 0.34 0.040.01 0.10 0.11

0.11 0.12

0.04 0.03

0.05 0.06

0.15

<0.02 <0.05

<0.01 0.030.07 0.04 0.02 0.08

<0.030.09 0.10 0.01

0.08 0.10

0.04 0.03

0.02 0.11

0.00 0.08

0.08 0.04 0.03

Lab140 141 142 143 145146 149 151 155 158180 190 197 203 204212213 215 220 221224 234240 241 243

22n $ 22p 0 40

MPV = 0.07 F-pseudosigma = 0.05

N= 59 Hu= 0.10 HI = 0.03

Rating Z-value 0 22 22nitro 22n 22p4 0.00 0.07 1 1.97 0.17 3 -0.96 0.02 2 -1.16 0.01

NR < 0.02

40

NR < 0.03 2 -1.16 0.01 4 -0.19 0.06 3 0.66 0.10 3 -0.67 0.04

NR < 0.02 3 0.58 0.10 2 1.16 0.13 4 0.19 0.08

NR < 0.005NR <01 NR <1 NR < 0.01 2 -1.27 0.00 3 -0.54 0.042 1.02 0.12 4 0.06 0.07 0 2.31 0.19 2 -1.23 0.01 3 -0.58 0.04

120

Page 124: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 15. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-51 (nutrient constituents)~Continued NH 3 + Org. N as N (Ammonia + Organic nitrogen as nitrogen) mg/L

0.60

-0 X-22 -22nitro

0. Other22. Cotorimetric 22nitro. Color nitroprusside

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

22n. Color Nessterizafon22p. Colon phenate 40. Ion selective electrode 371 3 31

0.11 0.080.48 0.35

0230.09

0.29 0.25 0.120.36 0.53

0.280.09

50.240.50

-40

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =Hl =

0.290.10

510.350.21

Lab Rating Z-value 22 22nrtro 22n 22p 401 2

10 11 1516 18 21 23 2538 48 55 56 5859 68 70 81 8587 89 91 96 97102 104 105 118 119127 128 129 133 134138 140 141 142 143145 155 180 190 203204 212 213 215221

3 04 3 01 24 0 04 3 4 3 13 4 4 231 24 3 44 4 NR 4 34 3 44 44 3 NR 343 3 3 2 33 4 NR01

-0.72 2.07 -0.29 0.69 2.35-1.73 0.11 -1.15 0.00 2.07 -2.06 0.08-0.39 0.99 0.09 0.30 -0.64 0.23 1.88-0.88 0.40 0.33 0.00 1.08 -0.88-1.67 -1.39 0.30 -0.61 0.410.10 -0.24

<0.2 -0.49 0.690.18 -0.88 0.07 -0.49 0.08-0.10 -0.78 0.21

-0.86 0.00-0.78 -0.75 -0.76 1.09 0.59 0.35-1.00 0.19 0.40

<1 2.17 1.85 0.48

0.22

0.26 0.36

0.53

0.17 0.29 0.50

0.25 0.39

0.20

0.29 0.40 0.200.12 0.15 0.32 0.23 0.330.30 0.27

0.24

0.31 0.20

0.30

0.300.28

<1 0.20 0.290.21 0.21 0.21 0.40

0.33

0.51

0.50

0.48

0.36

0.24

Lab Rating Z-value 22 22nitro 22n 22p 40224 1 -1.58240 1 1.78241 4 -0.29253 4 0.00

0.450.47

0.260.29

121

Page 125: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 15. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-51 (nutrient constituents)-Continued N03 + N02 as N (Nitrate + nitrite as nitrogen) mg/L

0.10 -

0.05

0.00

/ /1 - - j '" ' ----- - --r---y~-~7---

1 JK X X /* J I- ^tk. z-z ̂̂ '^^ ... JX. X =X- A-^ _£ - -y--*, *- -------- *-^ir_^r i

0 A 7 X 22 X 22cd * 22h 22sulf

0. Other 7. Ion chromatography 22. Cokximetric

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab Rating Z-value

1 NR 2 NR 5 NR 7 NR

10 NR13 NR 15 NR 16 1 1.69 18 NR 21 4 -0.0323 NR 25 4 -0.17 36 NR 38 4 -0.25 48 NR53 0 10.79 56 NR 59 NR 64 NR 68 4 -0.1769 NR 70 NR 75 NR 80 NR 81 4 -0.0883 NR 85 3 0.67 87 NR 88 0 32.29 89 NR91 NR 92 4 -0.03 96 NR 97 NR

104 4 -0.20105 NR 113 NR 114 NR 118 1 1.94 119 4 0.00127 NR 128 NR 129 4 -0.25 132 0 2.78 133 0 4.64134 4 -0.25 138 NR 140 4 -0.25 141 NR 142 4 0.20

22cd. Cd diazotization 22h. Colon hydrazine diazotization 22sulf. Colon sutfanilamide

2 3 6 11 4 2 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.40 0.12 0.02 1.16 0.11 0.06

0.01 0.02

0 7 22 22cd 22h 22sulf< 0.005

<0.02 <0.03

<0.05 <0.01

<0.06 <0.02

0.07 <0.01

0.01<0.05

0.01 <0.05

0.00 <0.08

0.40 <0.02

<0.04 <0.02

0.01<0.05

<0.01 0.01

<0.02 0.04

<0.01 1.16

<0.05<0.02

0.01 <0.05

< 0.003 0.00

<0.04 < 0.015 <0.04

0.08 0.01

<0.01 <0.01

0.00 0.11

0.180.00

< 0.005 0.00

<0.05 0.02

MPV= 0.01 F-pseudosigma = 0.04

N= 28 Hu = 0.05 HI = 0.01

Lab Rating Z-value 0 7 22 22cd 22h 22sulf143 4 0.42 0.03 145 NR < 0.02 146 NR < 0.05 149 0 3.06 0.12 151 NR <0.05155 4 -0.23 0.00 158 NR < 0.02 180 NR <0.01 190 4 0.03 0.01 191 NR <0.01193 NR <0.02 196 NR <0.05 197 4 0.25 0.02 203 NR < 0.02 204 NR < 0.02212 NR <0.1 215 NR <0.01 220 4 -0.14 0.01 221 4 0.14 0.02 224 2 -1.23 0.06234 NR < 0.01 240 NR <0.1 241 ,4 -0.03 0.01 243 NR < 0.01 247 NR < 0.01

122

Page 126: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 15. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-51 (nutrient constituents)-Continued total P as P (total Phorphorus as phosphorus) mg/L

0.10

0.09

0.08

0.07

0.06

0.05

0.04

0.03

0.02

0.01 +

0.00

3

-4 -X-22 -X-22m

0. Other 4. ICP22. Cotorimetric

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

22m. Colorphosphomolybdate

1 0 40.07 < 0.075 0.02

0.08

560.000.140.040.01

Lab Rating Z-value 22 22m

F-pseudosigma =

Hu = Hl =

0.040.01

610.050.03

1 2

10 11 1315 16 18 21 2223 36 38 39 4648 55 56 58 5968 70 81 83 8587 89 91 92 9697

102 104 105 113114 118 119 127 129132 133 134 138 140141 142 143 145146

3 4 3 4

NR0 1 3 4 2

NR NR 2034 4 3 0 30

NR 4

NR43 4 3 4 30 2 4 244 0 2

NR43 4 4 3

NR23 4 4

NR

-0.70 0.49 0.63

-0.21

5.48 2.04

-0.70 -0.21 1.26

1.05 -2.65 -0.910.00 0.07

-0.53 6.32

-0.703.02

-0.42

-0.070.91 0.28 0.70

-0.49 -0.63-2.11 -1.05 0.42

-1.41 -0.420.14

-2.11 1.41

-0.07-0.70 0.00

-0.35 0.70

1.41 0.77 0.42 0.00

0.03 0.05 0.05 0.04

<0.050.12

0.07 0.03 0.04 0.06

<0.1 <0.05

0.06 0.00 0.030.04 0.04

0.03 0.13 0.03

0.08<0.1 0.03

< 0.075 0.040.05 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.030.01 0.03 0.05

0.02 0.030.04 0.01 0.06

<0.01 0.040.03 0.04 0.04 0.05

<0.020.06 0.05 0.05 0.04

<0.1

Lab149 151 155 158 180183 190 193 203 204212 213 215 221 224234 240 241 243

Rating4 3 3 3 43 0 3 4 234 4 3 331 4 3

Z-value0.28 0.63

-0.66 -0.63 0.420.91 6.89

-0.70 0.35

-1.050.98 0.00 0.00

-0.84 -0.84-0.70 1.76

-0.42 0.70

0 4 22 22m0.04 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.050.05 0.14 0.03 0.05 0.030.05 0.04 0.04

0.03 0.030.03 0.07 0.03 0.05

123

Page 127: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 15. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-51 (nutrient constituents)-Continued P04 asP (orthophosphate as phosphorus) mg/L

0.04

0.03

0.02

0.01

0.00

-

;- x±*...L...J.

A *

). Other T. Ion chromatography 22. Colorimetric

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab Rating Z-value

1 NR 2 2 -1.08 5 0 2.43

10 4 0.45 13 NR15 NR 16 4 ' 0.09 18 4 0.00 21 4 -0.09 23 NR25 4 -0.09 28 0 2.16 33 NR 36 NR 38 3 -0.5439 3 -0.72 46 3 -0.99 48 4 0.09 53 0 9.08 55 0 5.4956 4 0.18 58 0 7.55 59 NR 64 3 -0.54 70 NR80 NR 81 NR 83 3 -0.56 85 4 0.00 87 3 -0.7288 0 3.06 89 3 -0.72 92 3 0.72 96 NR 97 4 -0.36

102 2 -1.08 104 3 -0.99 105 4 0.27 113 NR 118 NR119 NR -1.44 127 NR 128 NR 129 3 0.81 132 3 -0.54133 3 -0.54 134 2 -1.26 138 2 -1.01 140 NR 141 0 3.06

K'X

w *Y <^ *^ ̂ P ^Mtx^K ^k ^K >

-j- fc~ * * Tf"* **+ *9*

^K ^K-MJT~ jjluHjlL'^^

22m. Cobrphosphomolybdate

1 5 4 42 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00

0.03 0.02 0.14 0.02 0.01

0 7 22 22m< 0.001

0.00 0.04 0.02

<0.05<0.02

0.02 0.02 0.02

0.02 0.04

<0.01 <0.05

0.010.01 0.01 0.02 0.12 0.08

0.02 0.10

<0.01 0.01

<0.05 < 0.005

0.01 0.02 0.010.05 0.01 0.02

<0.01 0.010.00 0.01

0.02 < 0.004

<0.010.00

<0.05 <0.01

0.03 0.010.01 0.00 0.00

<0.01 0.05

,._ ._ , _ . . yk-x.

^j _J

^y^^

-^-j)f»X X^fc* V^&X?jK*K

-X-22 -X-22m

MPV= 0.02 F-pseudosigma = 0.01

N= 52 Hu= 0.02 Hl= 0.01

Lab Rating Z-value 0 7 22 22m142 0 6.03 0.08 143 4 -0.36 0.01 145 NR <0.01 146 NR < 0.05 149 4 0.36 0.02151 3 0.81 0.03 155 3 -0.87 0.01 158 3 0.54 0.02 180 NR <0.01 183 1 1.53 0.03190 0 11.33 0.14 191 4 0.36 0.02 196 NR < 0.05 203 3 0.54 0.02 204 4 -0.36 0.01212 3 -0.54 0.01 213 NR <0.02 215 NR <0.01 220 2 -1.35 0.00 221 3 -0.72 0.01224 3 0.72 0.02 234 3 -0.99 0.01 240 NR < 0.1 241 4 0.18 0.02 247 4 0.18 0.02

124

Page 128: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 16. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-52 (nutrients)

Definition of analytical methods, abbreviations, and symbols _____

Analytical methods

0. Other/Not reported

4. ICP

5. DCP

7. 1C

20. Titrate: color

21. Titrate: electro

22. Color:

40. Ion electrode

inductively coupled plasma

direct coupled plasma

ion chromatography

t'rtration: colorimetric (color reagent specified)

tit ration: eleclrometric

colorimetric [color reagent specified]

ion selective electrode

Abbreviations and symbolsN =

MPV =

F-pseudosigma =Hu =

HI =

mg/L =

Lab =NR =

number of samples

most probable value

nonparametric statistic deviation

upper hinge value

lower hinge value

milligrams per liter

laboratory code number

not rated, less than value reported

less than

Constituent NHj as N

NH3+Org N as N

NOa+NOz as N

Total P as P

PC-4 as P

Ammonia as nitrogen

Ammonia plus organic nitrogen

Nitrate plus nitrite as nitrogen

Total Phosphorus as phosphorus

Orthophosphate as phosphorus

126

127

128

129

130

125

Page 129: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 16. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-52 (nutrient constituents)-ContinuedNH3 asN (Ammonia as nitrogen) mg/L

1.40 -A /- -----pt- ------------- -------

. *r ' r v**<*oc^120 ./-^-----y------yx*«^-^~ >*fl/

1.00 - 00

0. Other 22n. Color rasterization 7. Ion chromatography 22p. Color, phenate 22. Cotorimetric 40. Ion selective electrode

N= 1 1 10 3 Minimum = 1.25 1.42 1.14 1.18

Maximum = 1.59 1.30 Median = 1.33

F-pseudosigma = 0.17Lab Rating Z-value 0 7 22 22N

1 4 0.40 3 3 -0.66 1.27 5 3 0.63 7 0 -2.65

10 4 -0.0711 2 1.10 13 4 -0.30 15 0 -2.53 16 3 -0.89 1.25 18 3 0.5219 4 0.16 23 0 -4.65 25 0 -2.18 1.14 26 2 1.10 1.42 33 2 -1.2436 2 1.34 38 4 -0.01 46 4 -0.07 48 2 -1.48 53 4 -0.27 1.3055 3 0.52 56 1 2.04 57 2 -1.24 58 1 -1.71 59 4 0.2864 4 0.16 68 0 3.10 1.59 70 2 -1.01 76 4 -0.42 80 4 -0.30 1.3081 1 2.04 83 2 -1.48 1.20 85 3 -0.89 86 3 0.52 87 0 -3.8288 0 -2.77 89 4 -0.07 90 3 0.63 91 4 0.16 96 3 0.5297 4 0.16

102 0 -3.82 104 4 0.01 105 4 0.40 1.36 107 3 0.75108 4 -0.42 113 3 0.63 114 0 -2.65 118 3 -0.77 119 2 1.10

xt^xwfl

-7 -X-22

54 15 0.93 0.74 3.57 1.50 1.34 1.32 0.08 0.1122p 40

1.36

1.38 1.10

1.321.42 1.30 1.11

1.371.34 0.93

1.221.44

1.33 1.32 1.20

1.37 1.50 1.22 1.18

1.351.34

1.24 1.29

1.50

1.25 1.37 1.001.09 1.32 1.38 1.34 1.371.34 1.00 1.33

1.391.29

1.38 1.10

1.26 1.42

<KX***X

H 22N

Lab127 128 129 132133134 138 140 141142143 145 146 155 158180 190 197 203204212 213 215 220 221224 234 240 241 243248 249 253 255

>ooo»>

-+*-'<

Rating0 4 1 4 43 3 0 3 34 2 0 4 44 0 4 344 14 4 43 34 4 33 0 4 3

>

^~A<X*? **?&ooo^^ <§ ~r~---""/-"-f

>2p » 40

MPV= 1.33 F-pseudosigma = 0.09

N= 84 Hu= 1.38 Hl= 1.26

Z-value 0 7 22 22N 22p4.15 1.68

-0.30 1 .30 -1.71 1.18 -0.07 1.32 0.280.52 1.37

-0.54 1.28 2.28 1 .52

-0.77 1.26 -0.77 1.260.16 1.34 1.45 1.45

26.32 3.57 -0.43 1.29 0.34 1.36

-0.07 1.32 2.63 1.55 0.16 1.34 0.95 1.41 0.28 1.35

-0.30 1.30 2.04 1.50 0.28 1.35 0.40 1.36

-0.190.91 1.40 0.87

-0.07 0.28

-0.97 1.240.87

-6.87 -0.42 1.29 -0.89 1.25

40

1.35

1.31

1.40 1.32 1.35

1.40 0.74

126

Page 130: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 16. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-52 (nutrient constituentsj-Continued NH3 + Org N as N (Ammonia + Organic nitrogen as nitrogen) mg/L

-20 X 22 22N -X-22p

0. Other 20. Titrate: cotorimetric22. Colorimetric

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudoskpa =

22n. Color Nessterization 22p. Color phenate40. Ion selective electrode

21.942.64

42.304.00

101.443.622.390.32

22.182.23

341.893.702.390.20

61.872.57

-40

MPV =F-pseudoskjma =

N =Hu =Hl =

2.370.22

582.502.20

Lab Rating Z-value 20 22 22N 22p 4013

10 11 1516 18 25 36 3846 48 55 56 5758 59 68 70 8185 87 89 91 9697 102 104 105 108113 118 119 127 128129 133 134 138 140141 142 143 145 155180 190 203 204 212

3 3 3 3 31 0 2 3 33 4 4 1 03 4 44 34 2 3 4 43 3 4 0 424 0 2 33 2 4 4 43 4 3 4 241 0 3 3

-0.92 -0.74 0.52 0.97 0.97-1.91 1.94 -2.14 1.24 2.64 -0.97 -0.61-0.56 -0.29 0.16 1.69 5.550.56 -0.29 0.25 -0.11 -0.970.29 -1.19 -0.65 0.29 0.11-0.61 -0.61 0.29 -3.89 -0.11-1.01 0.47 -2.231.33 0.61-0.84-1.42 -0.29 0.07 -0.070.88 -0.16 0.74 -0.11 -1.090.47 1.51 -4.15 0.52 0.61

2.16 2.20

2.48 2.58

2.58

1.89

2.15 2.23

2.242.30 2.40

2.74 3.60

2.49 2.30

2.42 2.34 2.152.43 2.10 2.22 2.43 2.392.23 2.23 2.43

1.50 2.34

2.14 2.47

1.87 2.66 2.50

2.18 2.05

2.30 2.38

2.352.56 2.33 2.53 2.34 2.122.47 2.70

1.44 2.48

2.50

Lab Rating Z-value 20 22 22N 22p 40213215221224240241249253255

03404330NR

7.350.65-0.296.020.25-0.980.925.64

4.002.51

2.303.70

2.422.152.57

3.62<5

127

Page 131: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 16. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-52 (nutrient constituents)-Continued N03 + N02 as N (Nitrate + nitrite as nitrogen) mg/L

2.00

1.80

1.60

1.40

(

£ /

"

--

I

X J**r . _#{ ^tj&w^L AA^AJ^ X^^ wioaaSIOlJ'CBlSflfl^***

f***^ ygt ygg&**1JfJrJIJfJf>

------r------^-------------- 0 A 7 X 22 X 22cd 4 22h > 22sulf

). Other 22cd. Cd diazotization r. Ion chromatography 22h. Color hydrazine diazotization MPV = 2. Cokmmetric 22sulf. Colon sulfanilamide F-pseudosigma =

N= 5 11 12 46 7 5 N = Minimum = 0.15 1.60 0.92 1.30 1.53 1.70 Hu = Maximum = 1.84 28.10 1.98 16.40 1.94 2.04 Hl =

Median = 1.72 1.75 1.74 1.64 F-pseudosigma = 0.05 0.12 0.10 0.09

Lab Rating Z-vaKie 0 7 22 22cd 22h 22sulf Lab Rating Z-value 0 713 5 7

1011 13 15 16 1819 25 30 36 3842 46 48 53 5556 57 59 64 6869 70 75 80 8183 85 86 87 8889 91 92 96 97

4 -0.24 1.70 128 4 -0.04 1.72 3 0.73 1.80 129 4 0.21 1.75 0 -4.09 1.30 132 1 -1.87 1 -1.78 1.54 133 0 4.20 4 0.15 1.74 134 4 0.054 -0.14 1.71 138 3 -0.62 4 -0.04 1.72 140 3 -0.58 4 -0.04 1.72 141 4 -0.04 4 0.04 1.73 142 0 2.42 2 1.02 1.83 143 2 1.213 0.53 1.78 145 4 -0.43 4 0.44 1.77 146 0 27.13 4 0.15 1.74 155 3 -0.63 1 1.69 1.90 158 4 0.33 4 -0.23 1.70 180 4 0.150 254.15 28.10 183 0 -15.17 0.15 0 -2.36 1.48 190 3 0.92 2 -1.10 1.61 191 4 0.05 1.73 2 1.07 1.84 193 3 -0.91 4 0.05 1.73 197 4 0.153 0.63 1.79 203 3 0.97 1 1.89 1.90 204 0 -3.61 4 0.15 1.74 212 0 141.41 4 -0.04 1.72 215 4 -0.04 4 -0.43 1.68 220 0 3.044 0.34 1.76 221 2 1.40 2 -1.39 1.58 224 4 -0.21 2 -1.10 1.81 234 3 -0.72 1.65 0 -8.33 0.86 240 2 -1.20 1.60 4 -0.04 1.72 241 3 0.822 -1.30 1.59 243 4 0.34 1 -1.68 1.55 247 3 0.54 1.78 4 -0.04 1.72 248 0 -9.26 0.76 4 0.15 1.74 249 0 48.04 0 7.38 2.49 253 0 -7.754 -0.04 1.72 255 4 -0.04 2 -1.01 1.62 3 0.58 1.79 3 -0.81 1.64 3 -0.72 1.65

""!'!4T *f ^^

4

1.720.10

86 1.79 1.65

22 22cd 22h 22sulf

1.53 2.16 1.731.66

1.66 1.72

1.98 1.851.68 4.54 1.66

1.76 1.74

1.82

1.63 1.74

1.83 1.35

16.40 1.72

2.041.87

1.70

1.811.76

6.71 0.92

1.72

102 2 1.02 1.83 104 4 -0.29 1.69 105 4 0.34 1.76 107 4 0.15 1.74 108 4 0.20 1.75113 0 -2.16 1.50 114 0 5.45 2.29 118 0 2.08 1.94 119 3 -0.81 1.64 127 4 -0.14 1.71

128

Page 132: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 16. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-52 (nutrient constituent-Continued total P as P (toral Phorphorus as phosphorus) mg/L

1.70

1.60

1.50

1.40

(i

-T /+& 1 **^&r ?* vx ^MfcaJ^JfiJfi^j^-I V/^ W»dv^^^

7*VntwwwwXX&VW

/ 1 ^^xg&yy^xx^^ <> ^JJKBKX**

/*

0^-4

). Other 22m. Cotonphosphomolybdate I. ICP !2. Colofimetric

N= 1 4 6 65 Minimum = 1.97 1.50 1.10 0.82 Maximum = 1.69 1.76 4.03

Median = 1.60 F-pseudosigma = 0.05

Lab1 37

10 1113 15 16 18 1922 23 25 36 3842 46 48 55 5657 58 59 68 7081 83 85 86 8789 91 92 96 97

102 104 105 107 113114 118 119 127 129132 133 134 138 140

Rating Z-value 0 4 22 22m3 3 34 44 2 0 4 34 0 2 0 41 3 1 304 2 4 3 44 4 4 1 34 3 4 4 23 4 3 2 44 0 4 2 13 3 3 2 2

-0.84 1.55 -0.84 1.55 0.67 1.64 0.34 1.62

-0.34 1.580.17 1.61 1.35 1.68 6.24 1.97

-0.17 1.59 0.67 1 .64

-0.17 1.59 -2.87 1.43 1.35 1.68

-3.37 1.40 -0.44 1 .57-1.69 1.50 -0.84 1.55 -1.69 1.50 -0.67 1.56 -8.43 1.100.00 1.60

-1.01 1.54 0.00 1.60 0.67 1.64 0.34 1.62

-0.17 1.59 0.00 1.60 0.17 1.61 1.52 1.69 0.51 1.630.34 1.62 0.51 1.63 0.00 1.60

-0.34 1.58 -1.38 1.52-0.51 1.57 0.17 1.61 0.84 1.65 1.01 1.66 0.00 1.600.00 1.60 5.06 1.90 0.34 1.62

-1.01 1.54 -1.62 1.500.51 1.63 0.51 1.63 0.84 1.65

-1.35 1.52 1.01 1.66

-X-22 -*-22m

MPV= 1.60 F-pseudoskjma = 0.06

N= 76 Hu= 1.64 Hl= 1.56

Lab Rating Z-value 0 4 22 22m141 4 -0.17 1.59 142 3 0.84 1.65 143 4 0.00 1.60 145 2 1.01 1.66 146 0 40.98 4.03155 2 -1.37 1.52 158 4 0.00 1.60 180 2 1.35 1.68 183 4 -0.34 1.58 190 0 -6.41 1.22193 2 1.18 1.67 203 4 0.44 1.63 204 4 -0.17 1.59 212 4 0.00 1.60 213 4 -0.34 1.58215 0 -13.15 0.82 221 0 2.70 1.76 224 3 -0.84 1.55 234 4 0.34 1.62 240 0 7.25 2.03241 3 -0.67 1.56 243 2 1.18 1.67 248 3 -0.67 1.56 249 0 2.53 1.75 253 0 -2.87 1.43255 4 -0.34 1.58

129

Page 133: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 16. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample N-52 (nutrient constituents)-Continued P04 asP (orthophosphate as phosphorus) mg/L

1.25 -- A

A****^1.15 -: **

1.05- A

n ^w

0. Olher 7. Ion chromatography 22. Cotorimetric

Minimur Maximur

Media F-pseudosigm

/X^ y*QQQtf$F&Q&^^

L >^x*^-/--f- ------------------- 0 -t^7 -X-22 -X-22m

22m. Color.phosphomotybdate MPV= 1.16

F-pseudosigma = 0.06 M= 1 10 8 62 N= 81 n= 1.45 1.05 0.58 0.12 Hu= 1.20 n= 1.24 1.25 3.49 Hl= 1.12 n= 1.18 1.11 1.16 a= 0.06 0.26 0.05

Lab Rating Z-value 0 7 22 22m Lab Rating Z-value 0 7 221 3 0.67 1.20 132 1 1.52 1.25 3 3 -0.67 1.12 133 3 -0.67 5 3 -0.67 1.12 134 3 0.51 7 1 -1.85 1.05 138 4 -0.17

10 3 0.67 1.20 140 0 -2.53 1.0111 3 -0.51 1.13 141 3 0.84 13 3 0.67 1.20 142 4 -0.17 15 4 -0.17 1.15 143 4 -0.17 16 0 4.89 1.45 145 4 0.17 18 3 0.51 1.19 146 0 39.1219 4 -0.34 1.14 155 2 -1.32 23 4 -0.34 1.14 158 3 -0.94 25 4 0.17 1.17 180 3 0.51 26 2 1.35 1.24 183 2 -1.01 30 4 0.00 1.16 190 4 -0.3433 3 -0.67 1.12 191 3 0.84 1.21 36 4 -0.17 1.15 203 2 1.08 38 3 -0.57 1.13 212 3 0.67 42 0 -9.80 0.58 213 1 -1.69 46 0 -17.54 0.12 215 0 -10.4548 1 -1.85 1.05 220 0 2.70 53 0 39.32 3.49 221 2 -1.18 1.09 55 3 0.84 1.21 224 0 2.53 56 0 -8.38 0.66 234 3 -0.84 1.11 57 0 2.36 1.30 240 3 0.8458 0 -4.05 0.92 241 4 0.00 59 4 0.00 1.16 247 3 0.57 1.19 64 4 0.10 1.17 248 2 1.18 70 4 0.00 1.16 249 4 0.34 80 2 1.35 1.24 253 3 0.6781 1 -1.69 1.06 255 3 -0.51 83 3 0.67 1.20 85 4 -0.17 1.15 87 3 0.51 1.19 88 3 -0.84 1.11

x*x?UW/N

22m

1.12 1.19 1.15

1.21 1.15 1.15 1.17 3.481 1 1 1 1

08 10 19 10 14

1.22 1.20 1.06 0.541.32

1.31

1.211

1 1 11

.16

.23

.18

.20

.13

89 4 0.00 1.16 92 4 0.34 1.18 96 4 -0.34 1.14 97 4 0.00 1.16

102 3 -0.84 1.11104 4 0.13 1.17 105 4 0.17 1.17 107 3 -0.67 1.12 108 1 2.02 1.28 113 4 -0.17 1.15118 4 0.34 1.18 119 4 0.34 1.18 127 4 0.00 1.16 128 3 0.51 1.19 129 0 -2.09 1.04

130

Page 134: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituents)

Definition of analytical methods, abbreviations, and symbols

Analytical methods

0 Other/Not reported

1 AA: direct, air =

2 AA: direct, N2O =

3 AA: graphite furnace =41CP

5 DCP =

6 ICP/MS

7 1C

12 Flame emission =

20 Titrate: color =

21 Titrate: electro =

22 Color: =

40 Ion electrode =

41 Electro =

50 Gravimetric =

51 Turbidimetric =

Abbreviations and symbolsN =

MPV =

F-pseudosigma =Hu =

Hl =

mg/L =

^/cm =

Lab =NR =

* =

ConstituentAcid Acidity as CaCO3

Ca Calcium

Cl Chloride

F Fluoride

K Potassium

Mg Magnesium

Na Sodium

pHPO4 as P Orthophosphate as Phosphorus

SO4 SurfateSp Cond Specific Conductance

atomic absorption: direct,air

atomic absorption: direct.nrtrous oxide

atomic absorption: graphite furnace

inductively coupled plasma

direct current plasma

mass spectrometry/inductively coupled plasma

ion chromatography

flame emission

titration: colorimetric [color reagent specified]

titration: electrometric

colorimetric [color reagent specified]

ion selective electrode

electrometric: [type meter specified]

gravimetric: [precipitate specified]

turbidimetric: [precipitate specified]

number of samples

most probable value

nonparametric statistic deviation

upper hinge value

lower hinge value

milligrams per liter

microsiemens per centimeter at 25° C

laboratory code number

not rated, less than value reported

less than

page132133

134

135

136

137

138139

140

141

142

131

Page 135: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample P-27 (tow ionic strength constituents)-ContinuedAcidity (asCaC03) mg/L

-0 Q 20

0. Other 20. Titrate: cotorimetric21. Titrate: electrometric

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

25.085.10

30.42

15.00

170.20

27.004.013.19

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =Hl =

4.743.19

226.572.26

Lab Rating Z-value 201 3 57 1525 38 81 83 89

105 109 132 141 146190 215 220 224 240247 257 272 273 276

3 NR 3 4 NR0 3 24 323 4 3 NR4 4 3 4 32 204 4

-0.70

0.84 0.14

6.97 0.66 -1.33 0.11 -0.78-1.35 0.57 0.11 -0.73

0.39 -0.36 0.77 -0.23 -0.90-1.42 -1.09 3.21 0.14 -0.11

2.50 <10 7.42 5.20 <2

27.00 6.85 0.50

5.10 2.26

0.42 6.57

5.08 2.40 <106.00 3.60 7.21 4.01 1.880.20 1.25

15.00 5.20

4.40

132

Page 136: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituents)~Contin'jedCa (Calcium) mg/L

2-80 _____________________ Q_ _____________________ .^wwv^^

-£H-mU~ -y

2.3o- ) "" nu^: [ J

,wv<y<fr**^*^^

i 0-^1-^2-^-4^-7-^20

0. Other 4. ICP 1. AA: direct air 7. Ion chromatography MPV = 2. AA: direct nitrous oxide 20. Titrate: cdorimetric F-pseudosigma =

N= 3 13 3 29 4 7 N = Minimum = 1.06 1.42 2.40 2.40 2.19 1.60 Hu =

Maximum = 2.37 2.60 2.80 3.30 3.16 4.28 HI = Median = 2.39 2.60 2.50

F-pseudosigma = 0.16 0.19 0.66Lab Rating Z-value 0 1

1 4 -0.12 2 2 1.09 3 3 -0.53 5 4 -0.49

15 2 1.1923 4 0.29 2.60 25 4 -0.12 26 1 1.77 28 2 1.31 33 3 -0.66 2.3736 3 -0.53 38 4 -0.25 42 0 3.16 46 4 -0.37 48 4 0.0058 0 -3.41 1.70 59 NR 64 4 -0.12 2.50 81 4 -0.45 83 4 -0.1289 3 -0.99 2.29

105 4 0.21 107 3 -0.57 2.39 109 4 0.21 2.58 110 0 -4.43 1.45113 2 1.35 119 4 0.16 132 3 0.74 134 4 0.30 138 4 0.29140 3 -0.57 2.39 141 3 0.86 145 3 0.57 146 4 -0.41 155 3 0.79158 0 2.59 180 4 0.37 190 2 -1.40 191 3 -0.86 2.32 204 3 0.90215 4 0.29 220 4 -0.12 2.50 221 4 -0.04 2.52 224 4 0.26 235 3 0.90240 4 0.49 241 3 -0.94 2.30 255 4 0.16 256 4 -0.12 257 2 1.11

2 4 7 20 Lab Rating Z-value 0 12.50 258 0 -3.82

2.80 261 0 3.00 2.40 262 4 -0.12 2.50 2.41 265 1 1.52 2.82 268 0 -4.56 1.42

270 0 -6.03 1.06 2.50 271 0 7.18

2.96 272 3 -0.51 2.85 273 2 1.11

276 0 -3.002.40 2.47

3.30 2.44 2.53

<5

2.42 2.50

2.58

2.86 2.57 2.71 2.60 2.60

2.74 2.67 2.43

2.723.16

2.62 2.19

2.752.60

2.59 2.752.65

2.57 2.50

2.80

^ 7/ 1"r"".

2.53 0.24

59 2.73 2.40

2 4 7 201.60 3.26

2.90

4.28 2.41

2.80 1.80

133

Page 137: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituents)-ContinuedCl (Chloride) mg/L

-21 X 22

7. Ion ctiromatography 8. AA: cold vapor20. Titrate: colorimetric

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

21. Titrate: electrometric 22. Cotorimetric40. Ion selective electrode

29 10.27 13.002.391.140.10

120.008.402.001.50

41.011.40

100.872.001.300.47

11.27

-40

MPVF-pseudosigma

NHuHl

Lab Rating Z-value 10 20 22 401 23 5715 23 25 26 3336 39 42 464858 59 64 81 8389

105 107 109 110113 119 134 138 140141 143 145146 158180 183 190 191 196197 203 204 215 220221 224240 241 247

4 4 2 0 43 4 4 4 4NR 1 4 3 13 4 4 4 NR4 4 NR 441 4 4 4 34 4 4 3 14 4 4 2 43 NR 4 1 43 4 4 0 2

0.00 -0.15 1.19 2.45 -0.140.89 0.14 0.00 -0.14 0.08

1.65 -0.21 0.92 1.650.60 -0.21 0.00 -0.10

0.19 -0.12

-0.39 -0.151.61 -0.04 -0.05 -0.27 -0.680.41 0.00 -0.33 0.68 -1.92-0.41 -0.39 -0.23 1.30 -0.02-0.54

0.41 1.65 -0.040.56 0.33 -0.14 4.74 1.24

1.20 1.13

1.78 2.39 1.131.63

1.27 1.20 1.13 1.24

<5 2.00

1.10 1.65 2.00

1.49 1.10 1.20

1.15 <5

1.29 1.14

<0.6 1.01

1.131.98 1.18 1.17 1.07

0.871.40 1.20

1.04 1.53

0.271.00 1.01

1.O9 1.83 1.190.94

<2 1.40

2.00 1.18

1.47 1.36 1.13

3.50 1.80

Lab Rating Z-value 10

1.200.49

571.781.13

20 22 40255256257258261262265268271272273276

NR13004341000

1.540.89 1.6314.83-2.470.21-0.51 0.95-0.19 1.111.65

12.1324.30 13.004.74

< 5

1.95

8.400.00

1.30

2.007.09

3.50

134

Page 138: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituents)-Contin'iedF (Fluoride) mg/L

0.200

0.150 --

0.100

0.050 -

0.000

-40 O 50

7. Ion chromatography 8. AA: cold vapor21 . Titrate: etectrometric

N =Minimum =

Maximum =Median =

F-pseudosigma =

40. Ion selective electrode 50. Gravimetric

40.080.45

1 1 240.40 0.07 0.01

0.540.100.03

10.07

Lab1 3 7

15 2325 26 36 39 4858 59 81 83 89

105 107 109113 119134 138 140 141 145146 190 196 215 224240 241 247 255 257258 262 265 272 273

RatingNR 2

NR 4

NR4 3

NR 0 04

NR3 0 0

NR3 4 4 43 4 23 3

NR 3 4 4 03 4 4

NR 40 3

NR 0 0

Z-value 7

-1.13 <0.5

0.25

0.00 0.61 0.120

-2.88 4.29

-0.25

-0.95 2.15

13.40<0.2

-0.71 -0.31 -0.30 0.000.61 0.03

-1.44 0.92

-0.61 0.080

-0.83 0.18 0.00

10.73 0.450-0.74 0.49 0.00 0.100

-0.462.15

-0.55

9.35 9.20

10 21 40 50

0.063

0.108

0.100

0.006 0.2400.092 <0.2

0.069 0.170 0.537

0.077 0.090 0.090 0.1000.120 0.101 0.053 0.130

<0.2 0.073

0.106 0.100

0.076 0.116

<0.2 0.0850.170 0.082

0.405 0.400

MPV= 0.100F-pseudosigma = 0.033

N= 31Hu= 0.125Hl= 0.081

135

Page 139: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituentsj-ContinuedK (Potassium) mg/L

0.500

0.400 --

0.300--

0.200

1. AA: direct air4. ICP 5. DCP

N =Minimum =Maximum =

Median =F-pseudosigma =

6. ICP/MS7. Ion chromatography 12. Flame emission

160.2700.3700.3320.022

16 10.000 0.3000.5500.3440.071

1 41.110 0.319

0.350

70.0000.9000.3500.263

12

MPV= 0.336F-pseudosigma = 0.038

N= 45Hu = 0.370Hl= 0.319

Lab Rating Z-value 1212 35

1523 26 28 33 3638 42 46 48 5859 64 81 83 89

105 107 109 113 119132 134 138 140 141145 146 158 180 190191 215 220 221 224235 241 255 256 257258 261 262 265 268

4 4 4

NR 04 4 0 3

NR4 1 4 2 4

NR 4 4

NR4

NR4 1 200 4 4 242

NR 4

NR 40

NR 3 440 3 3 0 00

NR 4 3 3

-0.16 -0.16 -0.16

4.630.37 0.37

-3.86 -0.95

-0.42 1.69

-0.16 1.16 0.37

-0.42 0.00

-0.08

0.11 -1.75 -1.27 -8.895.66 0.19

-0.16 -1.24 0.40

-1.22

0.37

-0.4520.47

-0.95 -0.19 -0.113.28 0.90 0.82

-8.89 -3.604.34

0.37 0.90 0.77

0.330

0.350

<0.50.320

0.330

0.350

0.320

0.333

0.340 0.270

0.343

0.289

0.300 0.329

0.370

0.370 0.365

0.330<1

0.511

0.190 0.300

0.400

0.380

<5

0.336 <2

<0.5

0.288 0.0000.550

0.330

0.3510.290

<1

<1.26

<1

0.3320.460

0.367

0.330

0.350

0.350

0.3191.110

0.000 0.2000.500

<0.39 0.350

Lab Rating Z-value 12270 1 1.96271 0 14.92272 0 -8.89273 1 2.01

0.4100.9000.000

0.412

136

Page 140: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituents)~ContlnuedMg (Magnesium) mg/L

0.610

0.510 --

0.410

0.310

0. Other 4. ICP 1. AA: direct air 7. Ion chromatograptiy 2. AA: direct nitrous oxide 20. Titrate: colorimetric

N= 4 13 2 27 4 4 Minimum = 0.440 0.300 0.630 0.387 0.427 0.000

Maximum = 1.940 0.490 0.720 3.580 0.550 10.370 Medial = 0.450 0.460

F-pseudosigma = 0.018 0.045Lab

1 23 5

1523 25 26 28 3336 38 42 46 4858 59 64 81 8389

105 107 109 110113 119 132 134 138140 141 145 146 158180 190 191 204 215220 221 224 235 240241 255 256 257 258

Rating4 1 3 30

NR3 4 4 4

NR4 3 4 30

NR 4 3 34 2 4 3 43 2 4 4 44 3 3

NR 14 3 4042 4 2 3 30 4 0 0 0

Z-value 0-0.21 1.70

-0.82 -0.53 3.59

-0.820.19

-0.21 -0.41 0.440

-0.47 0.80

-0.37 0.80

-2.83

-0.21 -0.55 -0.53-0.15 -1.48 -0.21 0.59

-0.210.88

-1.02 -0.21 -0.27 -0.010.13 0.51 0.59

1.800.17

-0.67 0.19 0.470

62.81 -0.01-1.22 0.01 1.18 0.59

-0.61-3.23 0.19

20.93 1.500 3.41

29.79 1.940

1

<0.5

<0.5 0.437

0.320

0.450

0.453

0.450 0.490 0.450

0.467

0.400 0.461

0.300

2 4 7 200.450

0.545 0.420 0.434 0.639

0.420 0.470

0.450

0.500 0.442 0.500

<5

0.433 0.434

0.387

0.504 0.410 0.450 0.447 0.460

0.486 0.490 <0.5

0.5500.469

0.427

3.580 0.460

0.519 0.490 0.430

0.470

0.630

-20

MPV= 0.461F-pseudosigma = 0.050

N= 54Hu = 0.504Hl= 0.437

Lab Rating Z-value 20261262265268271

29.99-0.415.220.39

199.52

0.440

0.4800.720

1.950

10.370272 0 -9.27273 2 1.22276 0 18.92

0.5210.000

1.400

137

Page 141: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituents)~ContinuedNa (Sodium) mg/L

1.55

1.45

1.35

1.25

1.15

1.05

t

- ___ ---

i

oo^1 p11-tOl . . ^ -A. A. ^ J^A-f*4/^

- - - - -rjOGOff"-" J^yO^^^^^^ _ A J

J* J^r r 4i~~ ~ "7 -------------/

. AA; direct air \. ICP 5. DCP

N = Minimum = Maximum =

Median = F-pseudosigma =

Lab1 23 5

1523 25 26 28 3336 38 42 46 4858 59 64 81 8389

105 107 109 110113 119 132 134 138140 141 145 146 158180 190 191 215 220221 224235 241 255256 257 258 261 262

Rating4 0 0 4 03 4 4 0 423 4 4 40

NR4 3 44 1 4444 4 1 443 4 4 3 04 40 0 42 4 2 4 40 21 0 2

Z-value0.00 6.77

-5.60 0.00 4.200.90 0.20

-0.20 -4.00 -0.40-1.40 -1.00 -0.40 -0.35 0.40

-3.80

-0.50 -1.00 -0.10-0.30 -1.60 0.00 0.20

-0.20-0.40 0.10 1.60 0.00 0.100.90 0.50 0.00

-0.80 -3.800.00 0.50 7.29 2.60

-0.401.10

-0.04 -1.50 -0.40 -0.10-4.20 -1.40 1.60 9.59 1.20

-n.,^^,^.^.,^,,6. ICP/MS

7. Ion chromatography MPV = 12. Flame emission F-pseudoskjma =

16 25 1 1 4 8 N = 0.96 0.78 1.30 2.07 0.96 0.92 Hu = 1.45 1.76 2.02 4.30 HI = 1.32 1.34 1.59 0.08 0.04 0.61

1 4 5 6 7 12 Lab Rating Z-value 1 41.34 265 2 -1.50 1.19

2.02 268 4 0.40 1.38 0.78 270 0 3.40 1.34 271 0 29.58 1.76 272 0 6.60

1.43 273 2 1.20 1.46 1.36

1.32 0.94

1.301.20 1.24

1.30 1.31 1.38

0.96 <5

1.29 1.24 1.33

1.31 1.18

1.34 1.36 1.32

1.30 1.35 1.50

1.34 1.35

1.43 1.39 1.34 1.26

0.961.34

1.39 2.07

1.60 1.301.45

1.34 1.19

1.30 1.33

0.92 1.20 1.50 2.30 1.46

/T.~f~~; T -L i - _ _ _ -/-________

/

1.34 0.10

55 1.43 1.30

5 6 7 12

1.68 4.30 2.00

138

Page 142: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituentsj-ContnuedPH

8.00

7.50 --

7.00--D-

6.50 --

6.00

10 O 41

8. AA: cold vapor 41. Direct reading

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

1 23 57

15 23 2526 3336 38 39 46 4858 59 64 81 8992

105 107 109 110113 119 132 134 138140 141 143 145 146155 158 180 183 190203 204 215 221 224240 241 243 244 247

Rating4 1 0 0 40 4 3 4 34 3 4 0 10 3 4 4 44 3 3 0 44 2 3 4 414 3 2420 3 1 323 4 0 43 4 0 4 4

Z-value0.23

-1.83 -2.18 -2.21 0.20

-2.14 0.05 0.67 0.11

-0.550.14 0.58

-0.05 2.08

-1.613.62

-0.70 0.30

-0.11 0.300.36

-0.83 0.74

-2.33 0.360.42

-1.33 0.74 0.05

-0.42-1.55 0.14

-0.70 1.21

-0.05-1.21 -6.96 0.58 1.71

-0.99-1.30 -0.55 0.42

-2.58 -0.49-0.55 -0.27 4.12 0.20 0.30

1 61 7.03 4.69

8.23 6.90 0.32

10 416.99 6.33 6.22 6.21 6.986.23 6.93 7.13 6.95 6.746.96 7.10 6.90 7.58 6.408.07 6.69 7.01 6.88 7.017.03 6.65 7.15 6.17 7.037.05 6.49 7.15 6.93 6.786.42 6.96 6.69 7.30 6.906.53 4.69 7.10 7.46 6.606.50 6.74 7.05 6.09 6.766.74 6.83 8.23 6.98 7.01

MPVF-pseudosigma

NHuHl

6.920.32

627.036.60

Lab Rating Z-value 10255256257258261262265266271272273276

344120444344

0.890.390.36-1.92-1.49-5.43-0.49-0.490.200.930.36-0.08

7.207.047.036.306.445.186.766.766.987.21

7.036.89

139

Page 143: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical'summary of'reported'data for standard'reference water sample P-27'(lowionic strength constituents)-Continued P04 asP (orthophosphate as phosphorus) mg/L

0.050

-7 -X-22 -22m X 22snd

0. Other 22. Colorimetric 4. ICP 22m. Cotorphospnomolybdate 7. Ion chromatography 22sncl. Color stannous floride

N= 1 0 1 5 13 0 Minimum = 0.000 0.400 0.002 0.000 Maximum = 0.150 0.030

Median = 0.002 F-pseudosigma = 0.007

Lab1 37

15 2326 2833 36 3839 42 48 58 6481 83 89 92

105107 113 119 132 134138 140 141 143 145146 155 180 190 191196 204 215 224 235240 241 247 257 258261 271 273

RatingNR NR NR NR NRNR 4

NR NR 4

NR 4

NR3 4

NR 3

NR NR 4

NR NR NR NR NRNR NR NR 4

NRNR 4

NR 20

NR NR

1 4

NRNR 4

NR 20

NR 0

NR

Z-value 0

0.00

-0.07

0.00

0.55 -0.07

0.51

0.00

-0.14

-0.14

0.00

-0.06

1.31 27.53

1.94 -0.07

0.07

1.25 2.50

<0.05 10.24 -0.14 0.000

4 7 22 22m 22sncl< 0.001

<0.01 <0.16

<0.02 <0.01

<0.5 0.002

<0.01 < 0.025 0.001

< 0.005 0.002

< 0.005 0.010 0.001

< 0.005 0.009

< 0.002 < 0.005

0.002< 0.002 < 0.004 0.000

<0.01 0.000

< 0.004 <0.01 <0.05 0.002 <0.01<0.05 0.001 <0.01 0.021

0.400<0.05

< 0.002 0.030 0.001

<0.5<0.1

0.003 < 0.001

0.020 0.038

0.150

MPV= 0.002F-pseudosigma = 0.014

N= 20Hu = 0.021HI = 0.001

140

Page 144: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituentsj-ContinuedS04 (Sulfate) mg/L

3.30

2.80 :

2.30 --

1.80

1 30 --

0. 4. 7.

/ ' 1/ i A

<>

*Vr -A-A-£*T*

/ p yr-

_____________________ ______^^^4______ >L_ /____ / ___A A I » A * A ±r*T*r*^ 7*" /

±=±^b±^c*TA^4rAAA_AA_*n*r-__ _y /Mn-r-r- _______ _______ _/_____^_____.

X f 7°°. _. _ _________ 7 _ r ___

- 0 0 4 ± 7 X 22 SO O 51

Other ICP Ion chromatography

N = Minimum = Maximum =

Median = F-pseudosigma =

Lab1 23 57

15 23 26 33 3639 42 46 48 5859 64 81 83 8992

105 109110 113119 134 138 140 141145 146 158 180 190191 196 197 203 204215 220 221 224 235240 241 247 256257

Rating Z-value4 0.04 4 -0.27 0 2.66 0 5.27 4 -0.044 0.23

NR 4 0.12 4 -0.20

NR4 -0.31

NR 4 -0.05 0 155.36 2 -1.124 -0.31 4 0.07 3 0.63 4 0.28 4 0.182 -1.44 4 -0.36 0 3.47 4 -0.22

NR4 -0.09 4 -0.19 4 -0.28 2 -1.12 4 0.423 -0.61

NR 0 75.77 4 0.50 2 1.044 -0.09 4 -0.04 4 -0.15 2 1.20 2 -1.041 2.01 0 17.50 0 -5.40 3 0.55 2 1.283 0.71 2 -1.12 2 1.04 0 39.46 2 1.50

22. Colorimetric 50. Gravimetric MPV = 2.42 SlTurbidimetric F-pseudosigma = 0.37 2330537 N=50

2.00 2.52 2.19 2.03 0.41 0.00 Hu= 2.80 17.04 2.89 30.50 6.38 3.70 60.00 Hl= 2.30

2.40 2.00 0.21 3.04

0 4 7 22 50 51 Lab Rating Z-value 0 4 7 22 50 512.43 258 2 -1.15 1.99 2.32 261 0 -5.18 < 0.5 3.40 262 0 10.70 6.38 4.37 265 4 -0.07 2.39 2.40 268 4 -0.45 2.252.50 271 0 -6.52 0.00

<2.5 2.46 2.34

<52.30 <2.5 2.40

60.00 2.00

2.30 2.44

2.65 2.52

2.481.88

2.28 3.70

2.34 <1

2.38 2.35 2.31

2.00 2.57

2.19 <5

30.50 2.60

2.802.38 2.40 2.36

2.86 2.03

3.16 8.90

0.41 2.62

2.892.68

2.00 2.80

17.04 2.97

141

Page 145: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 17. Statistical summary of reported data tor standard reference water sample P-27 (low ionic strength constituents)-ContinuedSpCond (Specific Conductance) jiS/cm

30.0

0. Other 41. Direct reading

N = Minimum =

Maximum = Median =

F-pseudosigma =Lab

1 23 5 7

15 23 25 26 3336 38 39 48 5859 64 81 89

105107 109 113 119 132134 138 140 141 143145 146 155 158 180183 190 193 203 204215 224 240241 243244 247 255 257 258

Rating3 0 4 4 34 3 3 341 4 2 2 43 3 4 4 34 3 4 4 04 3 0 3 41 0 1 4 40 23 0 43 3 2 0 44 3 4 3 0

Z-value0.63

-4.33 0.45 0.18

-0.720.00 0.81 0.81 0.99

-0.27-1.98 0.00 1.26

-1.44 0.00

-0.63 -0.54 0.18

-0.27 0.81

-0.09 0.81

-0.09 -0.09 -5.040.45 0.54 5.76 0.63

-0.181.71 4.05 1.53 0.00

-0.09-2.61 1.35 0.63

213.05 0.180.54

-0.99 -1.26 -5.53 -0.36-0.18 0.94 0.09

-0.54 2.97

1 56 50.7 20.0

263.0 26.1 1.07

0 4126.8 21.3 26.6 26.3 25.326.1 27.0 27.0 27.2 25.823.926.1 27.5 24.5 26.125.4 25.5 26.3 25.8 27.026.0 27.0 26.0 26.0 20.526.6 26.7 32.5 26.8 25.928.0 30.6 27.8 26.1 26.023.2 27.6 26.8

263.0 26.326.7 25.0 24.7 20.0 25.725.9 27.1 26.2 25.5 29.4

MPV =F-pseudosigma =

N =Hu =Hl =

26.11.157

27.025.5

Lab Rating Z-value 41261262268271272

0.00-1.89-1.89-0.36-0.99

26.124.024.025.725.0

273276

22.12 -0.90

50.725.1

142

Page 146: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 18. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample Hg-23 (mercury)

Definition of analytical methods, abbreviations, and symbols_________________________________

Analytical methods

0 Other/Not reported6 ICFVMS = mass spedrometry/inductivety coupled plasma

8 AA: cold vapor = atomic absorption: cold vapor

Abbreviations and symbols

N = number of samples

MPV = most probable value

F-pseudosigma = nonparametric statistic deviation

Hu = upper hinge value

HI = lower hinge value

ng/L = micrograms per literLab = laboratory code number

NR = not rated, less than value reported

< = less than

Constituent page

Hg Mercury 144

143

Page 147: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 18. Statistical summary of reported data for standard reference water sample Hg-23 (mercury)-ContinuedHg (Mercury)

0.60

-6 -O 8

0. Other 6. ICPMS 8. M: cok) vapor

N= 1 Minimum = 0.33 Maximum =

Median = F-pseudosigma =

Lab1 37

10 1113 15 16 18 2628 32 34 36 3942 46 4850 5155 58 59 68 6970 76 81 86 8789 96 97

105 108113 119 127 133134138 141 142 144 145146 149 193212 213

Rating3 0 44 3

NR3 4 340 3 4 3 34 4 4 0 33

NR4 243 3 3 3 03 4

NR4 03 3 4 4 34 2 24 24 4 2 3 0

Z-value 0-0.59 56.43 -0.03 -0.24 -0.87

-0.73 0.10 0.52 0.38

28.61 -0.73 -0.37 -0.59 -0.59-0.31 -0.41 0.38 2.47 0.66

-0.65

-0.31 -1.23 -0.170.76

-0.77 -0.59 -0.51 2.190.66 0.35

0.34 2.610.66 0.66

-0.38 -0.17 0.33 -0.87-0.31 1.19 1.36 0.03 1.220.23 0.10 1.22

-0.87 5.67

2 55 0.20 0.25 0.29 4.40

0.35 0.07

6 80.30 4.40 0.34 0.33 0.28<0.4 0.29 0.35 0.38 0.372.40 0.29 0.32 0.30 0.300.32 0.31 0.37 0.52 0.390.30 <0.5 0.32 0.25 0.330.40

0.29 0.30 0.31 0.500.39 0.37

<0.42 0.37 0.530.39 0.39 0.32

0.280.32 0.43 0.44 0.35 0.430.36 0.35 0.43 0.28 0.75

MPVF-pseudosigma

NHuHl

0.340.07

580.400.30

Lab215219221234235241245255257259265

Rating03342334031

Z-vafue8.03

-0.59-0.59-0.031.220.66

-0.84-0.359.140.80

-1.98

0 6 80.920.300.300.340.430.390.280.321.000.40

0.20

144

Page 148: REPORT ON THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S EVALUATION … · 2018. 8. 23. · Idaho State University Hazardous Waste Research Center Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Indianapolis

Table 19. Most probable values for constituents and properties in standard reference samples distributed in September 1996

[MPV, most probable value; ug/L, miefogram per liter; mgIL, milligram per liter; uS/cm, microsjemen per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius]

T-143 (trace constituents)AnaMe MPV F-pseudosigma

Ag 19.8 ug/LAl 22.1 ug/LAs 15.2 ug/L

B 35.0 ug/LBa 81.9 ug/LBe 8.50 ug/LCa 53.7 mg/LCd 19.1 ug/LCo 17.0 ug/LCr 37.0 ug/LCu 22.3 ug/LFe 222 ug/LK 2.50 mg/LLi 18.0 ug/L

T-145 (trace constituents)

1.48.31.25.24.5

0.662.21.51.22.61.914

0.212.1

AnaMe MPV F-pseudosigmaAg 7.55 ug/LAl 67.6 ug/LAs 9.88 ug/L

B 45.6 ug/LBa 37.1 ug/LBe 9.04 ug/LCa 30.7 mg/LCd 9.33 ug/LCo 10.0 ug/LCr 15.3 ug/LCu 11.0 ug/LFe 101 ug/LK 2.13 mg/LLi 27.3 ug/L

M-140 (major constituents)

0.9211.01.045.81.9

0.701.3

0.820.91.41.4

80.162.5

AnaMe MPV F-pseudosigmaAlkalinity 114 mg/L

B 41.6 mg/LCa 60.7 mg/LCl 25.8 mg/L

DSRD 382 mg/LF 0.530 mg/LK 2.58 mg/L

Mg 18.0 mg/L

N-51 (nutrients)

35.23.11.416

0.0370.14

1.0

N6550663568618681537990938434

N6164663663628480537884898336

N1034096

10467718796

AnaMeMgMnMoNaNiPbSbSe

SiOzSrTlUV

Zn

AnaMeMgMnMoNaNi

PbSbSe

Si02SrTlUV

Zn

AnaMeNa

total PpH

SiOzSO4

SpCondSrV

MPV10.4 mg/L18.2 ug/L36.1 ug/L34.0 mg/L71.0 ug/L83.4 ug/L16.6 ug/L9.63 ug/L23.4 mg/L306 ug/L10.0 ug/L12.0 ug/L30.0 ug/L20.0 ug/L

MPV8.68 mg/L20.9 ug/L923 ug/L412 mg/L11.0 ug/L12.7 ug/L8.80 ug/L10.1 ug/L11.3 mg/L203 ug/L15.3 ug/L1.10 ug/L11.7 ug/L10.0 ug/L

MPV39.0 mg/L

0.032 mg/L8.28 units7.35 mg/L150 mg/L600 uS/cm671 ug/L

3.42 ug/L

F-pseudosioma0.51.94.31.65.07.11.5

1.641.715

1.00.93.02.2

F-pseudosioma0.45

1.5129

1.91.31.2

0.961.30.7

92.7

0.101.72.4

F-pseudosigma1.9

0.0110.170.46

71931

3.01

N8886548881844660564533

95475

N8585438466803960534437

94670

N9257

1086698

1004319

AnaMe MPV F-pseudosigtna NNH3 as N 0.07 mg/L

NH3+OrgN as N 0.29 mg/LNOj+NOz as N 0.01 mg/L

Total P as P 0.04 mg/LPO4 as P 0.02 mg/L

N-52 (nutrients)

0.050.100.040.010.01

AnaMe MPV F-pseudosigmaNHgasN 1.33 mg/L

NH3+OrgN as N 2.37 mg/LNO3+NO2 asN 1.72 mg/L

total P as P 1.60 mg/LPO4 asP 1.1 6 mg/L

0.090.220.100.060.06

5951286152

N8458867681

P-27 (low ionic strength constituents)AnaMe MPV F-pseudosigmaAcidity 4.74 mg/L

Ca 2.53 mg/LCl 1.20 mg/LF 0.100 mg/LK 0.336 mg/L

Mg 0.461 mg/L

Hg-23 (mercury)

3.190240.49

0.0330.0380.050

N225957314554

AnaMeNapH

PO4 asPSO4

SpCond

MPV1.34 mg/L6.92 units

0.002 mg/L2.42 mg/L

F-pseudosigma0.100.32

0.0140.37

26.1 uS/cm 1.1

N5562205057

AnaMe MPV F-pseudosigma NHg 0.34 ug/L 0.07 58

145