Upload
duonganh
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
REPORT ON THE CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING
WORKSHOP FOR FARMERS IN NYANZA AND
WESTERN SUGAR BELTS
April-June 2016
Sugarcane Production Technologies and Best
Management Practices
By Lilian Odongo (ICT-Documentation)
Republic of Kenya The European Union Sugar Research Institute
ii
REMARKS FROM THE SPONSORS
The Director, SRI – Dr. Japheth Jamoza
Sugar Research Institute under the structure of Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research
Organization (KALRO) is mandated to conduct research and development of appropriate
production technologies and services for sustainable and enhanced production of sugarcane, the
sugar industry support over 6 million Kenyans and over
250,000 farmers depend on sugarcane growing for their
livelihoods. Increase in sugarcane production can be achieved
by performing best management practices like; plant new
varieties that early maturing with high sucrose contents, e.g 12
months maturity, testing soils to know the acidity and fertility
of the land, technology development by improving the fibre
content, proper land preparation, soil management and planting
quality seedcane free from diseases. SRI has developed over 21
improved sugarcane varieties over the years. It is SRI’s
responsibility to disseminate information to farmers; SRI will
collaborate with the counties in consultation with farmers to
disseminate the new technologies developed to farmers for
increased yields. The training was organized to breach the
knowledge gap of sugarcane farmers with the view to improve sugarcane production, farmers
were encouraged to highly adopt the knowledge and skills acquired during training as this would
raise their agricultural practices to the next level of production.
The Centre Director, SRI – Dr. Betty Mulianga
The significance of learning is an essential element to growth as
far as capacity building is concerned. Farmers are the driving
force behind quality and increased production of sugarcane in
the sugar industry and are urged to cooperate and support
research work in elevating standards of sugarcane production.
To broaden its scope, SRI has embarked on empowering the
women and youth to fully acquire the necessary knowledge and
skills on sugarcane production technologies and best
management practices for increased and sustainable yields. This
will transform their economics status to ensure poverty
eradication, improved livelihoods and wealth creation.
Information is power, SRI has established an effective
information management and exchange mechanism to
disseminate appropriate sugarcane and sugar production technologies for all players in the
industry.
iii
Head of Technology Transfer - Mr. James Odenya
Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization
(KALRO) made an obligation in the 2015/16 Performance
Contract to the Government to train sugarcane farmers on
standards of Good Agricultural Practices (K-GAP) in order to
ensure competitiveness of Kenyan produce in the world
market. This will greatly improve farmers’ knowledge on
sugarcane farming, lead to high yield and proceeds, creation of
wealth and employments consequently improving their
livelihoods. In defining gender roles, men were urged to
support and empower women to fully participate in farming
and attend refresher courses in the same capacity which would
transform their economic status. Farmers were encouraged to
grow sugarcane alongside other food crops to promote
diversification within the regions. Farmers need to learn how to
organize themselves and their communities to form coherent farmer groups (FRG) that supports
establishment of demonstration plots for bulking of seedcane and distribution in the farmers’
fields. SRI will do surveillance to ensure that farmers are practicing the right sugarcane growing
systems for improved yields. Feedback systems are available to enable stakeholders (farmers) to
express their views and experiences about sugarcane growing.
The Head of SRSP – Dr. John Rono
The European Union (EU) project mandate is to empower farmers
through capacity building by improving their knowledge and skills
and attitudes about farming matters to achieve their goals. Team
work is key and men were encouraged to work in one accord with
women with an aim of increasing production for better yields. The
100% turn out for the training was positive and therefore urged
participants to fully concentrate during sessions as the information
and topics presented were well packaged for ease of farmers
understanding. For future reference, the project published detailed
information on various facts about sugarcane management.
Challenges that face farmers in their production areas are to be
addressed by the key players in the sugar industry.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ v
LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... vi
1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Objective ............................................................................................................................. 2
1.1.1 Specific Objectives .................................................................................................................. 2
1.2 Farmers’ Expectation on Training ................................................................................... 2
1.3 Facilitation Mode ............................................................................................................... 2
2.0 FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Distribution by County ............................................................................................................... 3
2.3 Distribution by Gender ............................................................................................................... 4
2.4 Gender distribution by county ................................................................................................... 5
2.5 Distribution by Age ..................................................................................................................... 5
2.6 Age distribution by county ......................................................................................................... 6
2.7 Proportion of disable participants ............................................................................................. 6
3.0 TOPICS COVERED .......................................................................................................... 7
3.1 Issues raised by the farmers during the training .......................................................... 12
3.2 Suggestions........................................................................................................................ 12
CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................... 12
4.0 PICTORIALS ................................................................................................................... 13
4.1 Mabanga Bungoma county ...................................................................................................... 13
4.2 Kakamega county – Multipurpose training centre ................................................................ 14
4.3 Homabay county farmers– Kisii ATC .................................................................................... 15
4.4 Migori county – Kisii ATC ....................................................................................................... 16
4.5 Kisii/Narok county farmers – Kisii ATC ................................................................................ 17
4.6 Kericho county (Soin/Muhoroni farmers)– Tea Research Institute (TRI) ......................... 18
4.7 Kisumu county (Kibos/Chemelil)- Tea Research Institute (TRI) ......................................... 19
v
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Activity work plan by counties ..................................................................................... 1
Table 2: Subcounty representation ............................................................................................. 3
Table 3: Distribution by County,Gender, Age and PWD ......................................................... 3
Table 4: Topics Covered and facilitators .................................................................................... 7
vi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Distribution of the participants by county ................................................................ 4
Figure 2: Distribution of the participants by gender ................................................................. 4
Figure 3: Gender distribution by county .................................................................................... 5
Figure 4: Distribution of the participants by gender ................................................................. 5
Figure 5: Distribution of the participants by gender ................................................................. 6
Figure 6: Distribution of the participants by PWD ................................................................... 6
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Sugar Research Institute (SRI) being one of the institutes established by Kenya Agricultural
and Livestock Research (KALRO) Act of 2014 is mandated to undertake research and
disseminate information, innovations and technologies for the production of sugarcane
processing of sugar and co-products to enhance productivity and competitiveness in the sugar
industry. In order to achieve its objective, SRI embraces training as a tool to build capacity of
sugarcane farmers and other stakeholders on the best cane production technologies in sugarcane
growing areas for enhanced productivity and sustainability.
SRI through its outreach sub-centres namely; Mumias, Opapo and Nyando sugarcane growing
zones organized for trainings based on the results of training needs assessment undertaken
earlier, targeting an all inclusive sugarcane farming community comprising of men, women, the
youth and persons living with disability (PWDs), who had partial knowledge on sugarcane
farming and had never been trained before.
SRI in collaboration with the Sugar Milling Companies within Nyanza/Western Sugar belts and
the County governments of Bungoma, Kakamega, Homabay, Migori, Kisii, Narok, Kericho and
Kisumu organized for a five (5) day farmers training workshop in each county as follows:
Table 1: Activity work plan by counties
Date County Venue-institution
18th
-22nd
April 2016 Bungoma Mabanga Agricultural Training Centre (ATC)
25th
-29th
April 2016 Kakamega Multipurpose, Kakamega
2nd
-6th
May 2016 Homabay Kisii Agricultural Training Centre (ATC )
9th
-13th
May 2016 Migori Kisii Agricultural Training Centre (ATC)
16th
-20th
May 2016 Kisii and Narok Kisii Agricultural Training Centre (ATC)
23rd
May-3rd
June
2016
Kericho and Kisumu Tea Research Institute (TRI) Kericho
The training activity was jointly funded by the Government of Kenya (GOK) and the European
Union (EU) under the Sugar Reforms for Support Project (SRSP) component.
The training sessions were graced by a number of high profile guests form each county and
institutions who included:
The County government officials from Agriculture department
The Director, SRI,
The Center Director, SRI-Kibos
The Center Director, TRI
The Head of Technology Transfer, SRI
The Head of SRSP, SRI
The Principals of the ATCs
2
1.1 Objective
The overall objective of the training was to enhance capacity of the farmers on all aspects of
appropriate sugarcane production technologies.
1.1.1 Specific Objectives
The specific training objective included to:-
1. Educate farmers on Best Agricultural Practices on Sugarcane production with a view to
Increase sugarcane yields through dissemination and adoption of appropriate sugarcane
production technologies and innovation
2. Increase sugarcane yields through adoption of appropriate sugarcane production
technologies
3. Educate farmers on technologies that have been generated by SRI and their application in
sugarcane Production.
4. Educate farmers on their roles and that of other players in the Sugarcane production value
chain
5. Educate farmers on challenges in sugarcane farming as a business
6. Enhance diffusion and adoption of Improved Sugarcane varieties
7. Educate farmers on enterprise diversification programmes with a view to Improve food
security and general livelihood
8. Sensitize farmers on cross cutting issues and their relevance to Sugarcane production
(Gender, Disability, HIV/AID and, ADA issues).
9. Strengthening the capacity of small scale farmers in order to achieve sustainable
agriculture and improved food security.
10. Educate farmers on soil & water conservation and environmental management for
sustainable productivity.
1.2 Farmers’ Expectation on Training
Before commencement of the training, farmers’ expectation regarding the training was sought.
The following were their expectation:-
1. To gain knowledge and skills on sugarcane production technologies
2. To use knowledge acquired to empower other farmers
3. To learn changes in the Sugar Industry
4. To learn changes in farming technologies
5. To be educated on new sugarcane varieties
6. To put into practices technologies learnt during the session
7. To learn about Sugarcane pest & diseases
8. To learn about enterprise diversification
9. To be issued with participation certificates
10. To get empowerment in monetary value
1.3 Facilitation Mode
The facilitators for the training were drawn from the institute’s pool of Research Assistants who
achieved the objective through power point presentation conducted via use of the following
facilitation modes:-
3
i. Lectures
ii. Case studies
iii. Plenary discussion
iv. Questions and answers
v. Teaching aids (photographs and video)
vi. Field excursions
SRI sub-centres/zones conducted training needs assessment within the sugarcane growing areas
in the counties, based on the analysis SRI in collaboration with the milling companies undertook
the task to select farmers who had never attended any training organized by SRI in the past, they
were drawn from the sugarcane growing sub-counties found within the above eight (8) counties
as per the table below:
Table 2: Subcounty representation
County Sub-counties
Bungoma Kabuchai Webuye West Webuye East Kimilili
Kakamega Navakholo Mumias East Lurambi
Homabay Ndhiwa Rangwe
Migori Uriri Awendo Rongo
Kisii/Narok Kisii south Transmara west
Kisumu/Nandi Nyando Muhoroni Tinderet Aldai
Kericho Ainamoi Sigowet
2.0 FINDINGS
The total number of sugarcane farmers trained was 348. The table below shows distribution by
County, Gender, Age and Persons with disability (PWD).
Table 3: Distribution by County, Gender, Age and PWD
County Gender
Age PWD
Male Female Total <35 >36
Bungoma 46 14 60 9 51 2
Kakamega 48 12 60 4 56 1
Homabay 29 24 53 32 21 3
Migori 28 24 52 22 30 11
Kisii/Narok 34 9 43 22 21 1
Kericho 34 7 41 16 25 3
Kisumu/Nandi 28 11 39 10 29 1
TOTAL 247 101 348 115 233 22
2.1 Distribution by County
The figure below show farmers distribution by county; 17% were from Bungoma, Kakamega
17%, Homabay 15%, Migori 15%, Kisii/Narok 13%, Kericho 12%, Kisumu/Nandi county11%
4
Figure 1: Distribution of the participants by county
2.3 Distribution by Gender
The figure below shows the distribution of the participants by gender. In particular, 29% of the
participants were female while 71% of the participants were male.
Figure 2: Distribution of the participants by gender
5
2.4 Gender distribution by county
The graph below show gender distribution by the counties
Figure 3: Gender distribution by county
2.5 Distribution by Age
The figure below shows the distribution of the participants by Age. The number of youth
(age<35) who attended the training was 115 which is 33% of the sample size while the adults
(age>36) were 233 which is 67% of the sample size.
Figure 4: Distribution of the participants by gender
6
2.6 Age distribution by county
The graph below shows Age distribution by the counties
Figure 5: Distribution of the participants by gender
2.7 Proportion of disable participants
The figure below shows that 7% of the participants were persons living with disability (PWD)
while normal persons were 93%. The PWD comprised of farmers who were disabled in one way
or another, these included the deaf, the blind and the lame.
Figure 6: Distribution of the participants by PWD
7
3.0 TOPICS COVERED
During the five day long training farmers were educated on all aspects of Sugarcane production.
The topics included:-
Table 4: Topics Covered and facilitators No. Facilitator Topics Covered
1 Kennedy Yegon Soil Sampling&
Sampling techniques
- Indigenous plants/vegetation that describe the status
of Soil fertility
- Importance of Soil Sampling & testing
- Soil sampling tools& accessories
- Soil Sampling procedure& Instruction
- Consideration during sampling
- Frequency of sampling& testing
Harvesting and
Transport
- Sugarcane harvesting procedure
- Cutting procedure
- Safe cutting procedure
- Ideal harvesting Standards
- In field and transit cane losses
- Harvested cane transportation
Ratoon Management - Benefits of Ratoon crops compared to plant crop
- Recommended Ratoon Management practices
- Trash alignment methods
- Advantages of trash in Ratoon management Role of out growers
Institution
- Definition of Out grower Institutions
- Structure & membership
- Objective of the Institutions/Mandate
- Roles & responsibilities of the various players 2 Marygorreti Okal Variety
Identification
- Reasons for having different varieties
- Criteria used to identify Sugarcane Identification
- Different sugarcane Varieties their features,
morphology and general characteristics
Seed cane Selection
- Meaning of seed
- Attributes of ideal Seed material
- Seed cane selection criteria 3 Eliud Ombok Fertilizer
application, rate,
type and methods
- Definition of fertilizer
- Type of fertilizers
- Rates of fertilizer application by zone
- Methods of fertilizer application
- Macro nutrients
- Micronutrients
- Role of potassium in Sugarcane production
- Nitrogenous fertilizers and role of Nitrogen in crop
8
No. Facilitator Topics Covered
development
- Fertilizer deficiency symptoms
Common Sugarcane
weeds and their
management
- Definition of weeds
- Economic importance of weeds
- Common Sugarcane weeds
- Factors influencing weeds survival
- Classification of weeds
- Major weeds of Sugarcane
- Critical period of weed-crop competition
- Method of weed control
- Integrated weed management Seed cane
Multiplication
- Origin & distribution of Sugarcane
- Sugarcane fuzz and its role in sugarcane
development
- Sugarcane germplasm
- Objective of Sugarcane improvement
- Improved Sugarcane varieties developed by SRI
- Multiplication of Seed cane and collaborating
institutions
- Selection of parents
- Seed cane preparation and treatment
- Farmer as Seed cane producer
- Identification & requirement for Seed cane farmers
- Seed cane nursery
- Seed cane harvesting and distribution
- Single eye bud technology 4 Kennedy Ngutu Sugarcane Pest and
its control
- Termites
- Borers
- Moles
- White grubs
- Primates
- Sugarcane scales
- Sugarcane aphids
Sugarcane diseases
and its control
- Ratoon stunting disease covering its mode of
transmission spread, symptoms and management
- Sugarcane Mosaic virus covering its mode of
transmission& spread, symptoms and management
- Sugarcane leaf yellow virus covering its mode of
transmission& spread, symptoms and management
- General methods used to control spread of diseases 5 Douglas Omoka Soil and its
Management
- Meaning of Soil
- Function of Soil
9
No. Facilitator Topics Covered
- Factors that affect Soil formation & development
- Soil component
- Soil type
- Soil suitable for sugarcane growing
- Spoil Physical Suitability parameters
- Soil sampling & testing
- Soil nutrients that influence yields
- Soil loss
- Effects of Soil erosion
- Soil management Variety
recommendation by
zones
- Overview of major Sugarcane varieties in Kenya
- Potential impact of New varieties in the Sugar
Industry
- Features of Sugarcane varieties released by SRI to
date
- Varieties suitable for Kakamega County 6 Francis Osore Irrigation Methods
- Over view of irrigation in Kenya
- Description and meaning of irrigation
- When should irrigation take place
- Factors to consider when designing for irrigation
system
- Choice of irrigation method
- Irrigation methods
- System maintenance
- Benefits of irrigation
Drainage
- Description of drainage process and its meaning
- Effects of excess water in farms
- Factors to consider when designing for a drainage
system
- Types of drainage
Soil and water
Conservation
- Description of Soil and water conservation process
- Application measures
- Conservation measures
- Soil & water conservation measures
- Water harvesting& its advantages and mitigation
measures
- Water storage
- Features of water pan
Environment
Conservation
- Description and definition of environment
- Impact of environment degradation
- Consequences of not conserving the environment
10
No. Facilitator Topics Covered
- Environmental issues in Kenya 7 Rashid Katama Enterprise
diversification
- Objective of Enterprise diversification
- Factors influencing diversification
- Drivers of diversification
- Benefits of diversification
- Factors considered in diversification
- Examples of Enterprise Combination
Group dynamic - Definition of a group and what Group dynamic
involves
- Process/Stages of Group development/Evolution
- Characteristics of a Group
- Types of Groups
- Factors affecting Group behavior
- What causes poor Group performance
- Turning Groups into effective teams
- Strategies for improving team dynamics
- Factors responsible for success of Groups 8 Lilian Odongo E-service in
KALRO/SRI
- What is E-service
- Why E-Service in SRI
- Electronic Access mechanisms
- The Social media
- The SRI website
- E-Repository
Information access
and management
- What is Information management
- Rationale for availing information & knowledge
- Information Access mechanisms
- Steps to managing information
- The essence of information management 9 Willis Odeny,
Dorothy Awino
Angela Fedha
Drug and Substance
abuse
- Meaning of drugs
- Illegal drugs
- Myth busting
- Types of drugs
- Effects of drugs
- Why people take to drinking
- Effects of consuming Alcohol
HIV/AIDS Gender
&issues
- Overview of HIV/AIDS, Gender and Disability in
the Sugar Industry
- Best management practices
- Gender
- HIV/AIDS
- Discrimination & stigma
- Cultural & tradition
11
No. Facilitator Topics Covered
- Equity and diversity in the Sugar Industry
- Plenary-Discussion 10 Gabriel Bor Land Preparation
- Factors considered when selecting sugarcane field
- Objective of land preparation
- Factors influencing the type of land preparation
- Source of power for land preparation
- Factors influencing choice of land preparation
implements
- Categories of land preparation
- Stages of land preparation
- Appropriate ploughing, harrowing, furrowing and
ridging standards
Cane establishment - Objective of timely planting
- Principles of Good crop Establishment
- Sugarcane planting Material
- Sugarcane planting methods and their Suitability,
Merits and demerits
- Recommended Sugarcane establishment standards Role of Farmer
Research Groups
- Overview of FRG Approach
- Advantages of FRG in Technology dissemination
- Benefits of FRG
- FRG success stories
- Case study: Kiptugumo FRG
- FRG formation protocol 11 George Adoyo Cost Benefit
Analysis (CBA) in
sugarcane
production
- Definition of CBA
- Uses of CBA
- Advantages of using CBA
- Designing a CBA
- Cost Analysis
- Benefit Analysis
- Case examples: Mumias, Nzoia, Sony, Transmara,
Nyando and Soin sugar zones Keeping Farm
Records
- Definition
- Categories
- Examples of the types
- Importance of farm records
- Application of farm records 12 Asenath Dumo Sign Language - Sign Language interpretation
13
Caroline Thuo Evaluation - Training Evaluation
12
3.1 Issues raised by the farmers during the training
During the training the farmers raised issues that affect Sugarcane production within the Counties.
They noted that some services and operations offered by the milling companies were far below
the expected standards, that they were being educated on. Some of the matters raised included:-
1. Delayed payment of sugarcane harvested and supplied to the miller.
2. Non supply of inputs (Fertilizer) by the miller
3. Low cane prices
4. High cost of inputs
5. Poor services by cane cutters contractors
6. Poor seed cane supply
3.2 Suggestions
During the training the farmers noted that there was need for SRI to undertake the following:-
1. Follow up and evaluation of the trained farmers in order to assess the impact of such
trainings
2. SRI to form more Farmer Research Groups in sugarcane growing zones, especially the
trained farmers
3. SRI to advice millers on appropriate Sugarcane Best Management Standards
CONCLUSION
The Institute achieved its objective by training 348 participants from the various counties; at end
of training all the farmers trained were awarded certificates of participation and packaged
information on sugarcane production technologies and best management practices. Farmers’
were urged to implement the knowledge and skill acquired for increased production and wealth
creation among the sugarcane farming community. This was an excellent approach and therefore
the institute should organize for more training to other areas so as to increase adoption of
technologies and improve on management of cane.
Report by:
Lillian Odongo
ICT - Documentation
13
4.0 PICTORIALS
4.1 Mabanga Bungoma county
Sugarcane farmers in Bungoma county- Group
photoo
Head of Technology Transfer (TT) addressing
farmers
Section of participants
Training in session – Variety identification
The Director, SRI awarding certificates to
farmers
14
Training in session- sugarcane weed management
4.2 Kakamega county – Multipurpose training centre
The Director, SRI addressing farmers
SRPS Project Manager giving remarks
Training in session – Soil Management
Training in session – Sugarcane diseases
Section of Participants
SRPS Project Manager awarding certificates
15
4.3 Homabay county farmers– Kisii ATC
Homabay county farmers
The Center Director, SRI giving remarks
Training in session – Irrigation and drainage
Training in session – Soil sampling analysis
Training in session – Seedcane multiplication
The Head of Technology transfer awarding certificates
16
4.4 Migori county – Kisii ATC
Migori county farmers – Group photo
The Director, SRI giving his remarks
Training in session – sign language interpretation
Training in session – Cost benefit analysis in
sugarcane farming
A section of the participants
Director of Agriculture, Migori county awarding
certificates
17
4.5 Kisii/Narok county farmers – Kisii ATC
Kisii/Narok county farmers – Group photo
The head of TT, SRI giving his remarks
Training in session – Keeping farm records
Training in session – Variety recommendation by
zone
Training in session – Cross cutting issues, HIV Aids
and gender issues
Director of food crops, Kisii county awarding
certificates
18
4.6 Kericho county (Soin/Muhoroni farmers)– Tea Research Institute (TRI)
Soin/Muhoroni farmers, Kericho county – Group
photo
A group pf people living with disability (PDW)
Training in session – Seedcane selection
Training in session – Cane Establishment
Training in session – Enterprises diversification
The Head of TT awarding certificates
19
4.7 Kisumu county (Kibos/Chemelil)- Tea Research Institute (TRI)
Kibos/Chemelil farmers, Kericho county – Group
photo
The Centre Director, TRI giving remarks
Training in session – E-services in KALRO-SRI
Training in session – Drug & Substance Abuse
Training evaluation session
The Head of TT and EU Administrator awarding
certificates
20