6
1 Medical Evidence A Report by: Jose Parcon Jonathan Siddayao Evidence is the means, sanctioned by the Rules of Court, of ascertaining in a judicial proceeding the truth respecting a matter of fact. (Sec. 1, Rule 128, Rules of Court). It is the species of proof, or probative matter, legally presented at the trial of an issue by the act of the parties and through the medium of witnesses, records, documents, concrete objects, etc. for the purpose of inducing belief in the minds of the court as to their contention. (Black’s Law Dictionary). If the means employed to prove a fact is medical in nature, then it becomes medical evidence. 1 Types of Medical Evidence 2 1. Autoptic or Real Evidence This is evidence made known to the senses of the court. It includes the sense of vision, hearing, taste, smell and touch. Sec.1, Rule 130, Rules of Court. View of an object. Whenever an object has such a relation to the fact in issue as to afford reasonable ground of belief respecting the latter, such object may be exhibited to or viewed by the court, on its existence, situation, condition, or 1 Pedro P. Solis, Medical Jurisprudence, R.P. Garcia Publishing Co., 1988. 2 Ibid.

Report on Medical Evidence

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

medical evidence

Citation preview

  • 1

    Medical Evidence

    A Report by:

    Jose Parcon

    Jonathan Siddayao

    Evidence is the means, sanctioned by the Rules of Court, of ascertaining in a

    judicial proceeding the truth respecting a matter of fact. (Sec. 1, Rule 128,

    Rules of Court).

    It is the species of proof, or probative matter, legally presented at the trial of

    an issue by the act of the parties and through the medium of witnesses,

    records, documents, concrete objects, etc. for the purpose of inducing belief

    in the minds of the court as to their contention. (Blacks Law Dictionary).

    If the means employed to prove a fact is medical in nature, then it becomes

    medical evidence.1

    Types of Medical Evidence2

    1. Autoptic or Real Evidence This is evidence made known to the senses of the court. It includes the sense of vision, hearing, taste, smell and touch.

    Sec.1, Rule 130, Rules of Court. View of an object. Whenever an

    object has such a relation to the fact in issue as to afford reasonable

    ground of belief respecting the latter, such object may be exhibited to

    or viewed by the court, on its existence, situation, condition, or

    1PedroP.Solis,MedicalJurisprudence,R.P.GarciaPublishingCo.,1988.2Ibid.

  • 2

    character proved by witnesses, as the court in its discretion may

    determine.

    The court may require the physician to present the skeleton of the

    victim of a criminal act exhumed and examined for the judge to see

    the presence and degree of the ante-mortem fracture.

    Limitations to the Presentation of Autoptic Evidence

    a. Indecency and Impropriety

    Presentation of evidence may be necessary to serve the best interest

    of justice but the notion of decency and sensitivity may cause

    inhibition of its presentation.

    The court may not allow exposure of the genitalia of an alleged victim

    of sexual offense to show the presence and degree of injuries suffered

    by the victim. There are other ways for the court to know the facts

    other than actual exhibition.

    b. Repulsive Objects and those Offensive to Sensibilities

    Foul smelling objects, persons suffering from highly infectious and

    communicable disease, or objects which when touch may mean potential

    danger to the life and health of the judge may not be presented.

    However, if such evidence is necessary in the adjudication of the case, the

    question of indecency and impropriety of the fact that such evidence is

    repulsive or offensive to sensibilities, it may be presented. This will depend

    on the sound discretion of the court.

    2. Testimonial Evidence

    A physician may be summoned to appear before a court to give his

    testimony. He may be presented in court either as an ordinary

    witness or expert witness, or both.

  • 3

    a. Ordinary Witness

    A physician who testifies in court on matters he perceived from his

    patient in the course of physician-patient relationship is considered

    as an ordinary witness.

    An exception to the ordinary witness rule is the privilege

    communication between physician and patient. The physician and

    other medical practitioners cannot in a civil case, without the

    consent of the patient, be examined as to any information, which

    he may have acquired in attending such patient in a professional

    capacity.

    A medical witness can only testify on matters derived by his own

    perception. He can only testify on matters which he has personal

    knowledge.

    Matters, which are not from the personal knowledge of the witness

    but from mere repetition of what he has heard others say, are

    hearsay evidence.

    As a rule, hearsay evidence is not admissible in court. But one of

    the exceptions to the non-admissibility of hearsay evidence is

    dying declaration.

    The declaration of a dying person under the consciousness of his

    impending death is admissible because of its necessity and it is

    trustworthy.

    For dying declaration to be admissible, the following

    requisites must be present:3 3Ibid.

  • 4

    i. It must be shown that the declarant was conscious of his

    impending death;

    ii. That the declaration must be with regard to his impending

    death;

    iii. That the declarant was in full possession of his mental

    faculties when he made the declaration;

    iv. Such evidence is presented in court in a case of homicide,

    murder or parricide wherein the declarant was the victim.

    b. Expert Witness

    A physician on account of his training and experience can give his

    opinion on a set of medical facts. He can deduce or infer

    something, determine the cause of death, or render opinion

    pertinent to the issue and medical in nature.

    The probative value of the expert medical testimony depends upon

    the degree of learning and experience on the line of what the

    medical expert is testifying, the basis and logic of his conclusion,

    and other evidences tending to show the veracity or falsity of his

    testimony.

    3. Experimental Evidence

    A medical practitioner as a witness may be allowed by the court to

    confirm his allegation as a corroborated proof to an opinion he

    previously stated.

    Example:

  • 5

    In the issue as to how long a person can survive, after the

    administration of a lethal dose of poison, the medical witness can prove

    within the view of the court by administration of said poison to

    experimental animals.

    4. Documentary Evidence

    Document is an instrument on which is recorded by means of letters,

    figures, or marks intended to be used for the purpose of recording that

    matter which may be evidentially used.

    Example:

    a) Medical certification or Report on:

    Medical examination;

    Physical examination;

    Necropsy;

    Laboratory;

    Exhumation;

    Birth;

    Death.

    b) Medical expert opinion;

    c) Deposition A written record of evidence given orally and transcribed in writing in the form of questions by the interrogator and the answer of the

    deponent by the latter. 5. Physical Evidence

  • 6

    These are articles and materials, which are found in connection with

    the investigation and which aid in establishing the identity of the

    perpetrator or the circumstances under which the crime was

    committed, or in general assist in the prosecution of a criminal.

    Types of Physical Evidence:

    a) Corpus Delicti Evidence Objects or substances that may be a part

    of the body of the victim of murder, prohibited drugs recovered

    from the possession of the offender, knife with bloodstain or

    fingerprint of the suspect, etc.

    b) Associative Evidence These are physical evidences, which may link

    a suspect to the crime. The suspect may leave clues at scene of the

    crime such as: weapons or tools used in the crime, fingerprint or

    foot impression of the suspect, wearing apparel, etc., and other

    articles of value that may be useful in solving the crime.

    c) Tracing evidence Physical evidences which may assist

    investigators in locating the suspect such as: aircraft or ships

    manifest, physicians clinical record in case the suspect seeks

    medical assistance for injuries sustained in an encounter, blood

    stains of the wounded suspect infer direction he traversed during

    escape.

    Source:

    Pedro P. Solis, Medical Jurisprudence, R.P. Garcia Publishing Co.,

    1988.