7
•Report on fitting new FINAL data: • e- CC (175pb -1 : P=0.30 71pb -1 , P=-0.27 104pb -1 ) (DESY-08-177) • e- NC (169pb -1 , P=+0.29, P=-0.27)(DESY-08-202) HER(E p =920,44.5pb -1 ), MER(E p =575, 7.1pb -1 ), LER(E p =460, 14.0pb -1 ) reduced cross-sections (DESY- 08-666!!!) •THIS TALK-- Improvement to PDF uncertainties •On Friday High Q2 talk- Electroweak parameters •What are we planning before DIS09?- to include NC and CC e+ polarised data ZEUS fits-report: FL session Feb 2009 A.M.Cooper-Sarkar and C. Gwenlan

Report on fitting new FINAL data:

  • Upload
    zaria

  • View
    24

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ZEUS fits-report: FL session Feb 2009 A.M.Cooper-Sarkar and C. Gwenlan. Report on fitting new FINAL data: e- CC (175pb -1 : P=0.30 71pb -1 , P=-0.27 104pb -1 ) (DESY-08-177) e- NC (169pb -1 , P=+0.29, P=-0.27) (DESY-08-202) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Report on fitting new FINAL data:

•Report on fitting new FINAL data:

• e- CC (175pb-1: P=0.30 71pb-1, P=-0.27 104pb-1)(DESY-08-177)

• e- NC (169pb-1, P=+0.29, P=-0.27)(DESY-08-202)

•HER(Ep=920,44.5pb-1), MER(Ep=575, 7.1pb-1), LER(Ep=460, 14.0pb-1) reduced cross-sections (DESY-08-666!!!)

•THIS TALK-- Improvement to PDF uncertainties

•On Friday High Q2 talk- Electroweak parameters

•What are we planning before DIS09?- to include NC and CC e+ polarised data

ZEUS fits-report: FL sessionFeb 2009

A.M.Cooper-Sarkar and C. Gwenlan

Page 2: Report on fitting new FINAL data:

PDFs from the new fit compared to published

ZEUS-JETS fit – central values of the PDFs do not change much…..

Adding New NC and CCe- data to ZEUS-JETS fit → ZEUS-pol fit

(NEW)

This takes 509 data points up to 760 data points

(NEW)

Dataset 2/ndp ndp

CC-ve poln. 1.33 37

CC+ve poln. 0.96 34

NC-ve poln. 0.99 90

NC+ve poln. 0.96 90

Quadratic 2

Remember we have shown this before with preliminary e- data- this is now final

Page 3: Report on fitting new FINAL data:

The xuv PDF uncertainties are reduced at high-x ….. as expected since NC and CC e- cross-sections are both u dominated

However some other uncertainties increase marginally- this can always happen when OFFSETing correlated errors

The d-flavour sector is less well known- hence we look forward to CCe+ data

(NEW)

Page 4: Report on fitting new FINAL data:

PDFs from the new fit compared to the ZEUS-pol fit (showing just impact of HER,MER,LER data) – central values of the PDFs do not change much….

Adding HER, MER, LER data to ZEUS-pol fit → ZEUS-pol-FL fit !

This takes 760 data points up to 922 data points

Dataset 2/ndp ndp

HER 1.09 54

MER 0.69 54

LER 0.84 54

Quadratic 2

Page 5: Report on fitting new FINAL data:

All systematics added in quadrature (i.e. no treatment for correlations) impact of LER,MER,HER data on low-x sea and low-x gluon is clearly visible

Quadratic Errors

Page 6: Report on fitting new FINAL data:

However using the OFFSET method to account for correlated systematic errors this is less clear. The new HER,MER, LER data reduce the uncertainties on the low-x sea- as expected since this is the kinematic region of the data and the data relate DIRECTLY to the sea.

The relationship of the gluon is less direct - Gluon uncertainty at very low x is reduced, but uncertainty band wider at higher x

Offset method

Page 7: Report on fitting new FINAL data:

Summary/questions

• The new HER, MER, LER data has impact on the fit• I doubt that ZEUS wants to reconsider the use of its

traditional OFFSET method in favour of Hessian or Quadratic at this stage

• But the combination of this with the H1 data could be dramatic