Upload
gregory-potter
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Agenda - Reports Experience of working with APNIC Chia-Nan Hsieh, TWNIC the procedure dealing with IP reqeust from KRNIC ISPs Moo-Ho Cheon, KRNIC Organizational Change in JPNIC Izumi Okutani, JPNIC
Citation preview
Report of
Open NIR Meetingat 12th APNIC Open Policy Meeting in Taipei
MAEMURA Akinori, ChairJPNIC IPwg
Equant Japan
Outline and SituationHeld on Thursday 30th, 16:00—19:30Chair has just changed from Lee SeungMin to MAEMURA Akinori The forth NIR meetingThe first OPEN NIR meeting
Previous three are closed within NIR people4 non-NIR people out of 36 participants
Facing the turning point of NIR structure
Agenda - ReportsExperience of working with APNIC
Chia-Nan Hsieh, TWNICthe procedure dealing with IP reqeust from KRNIC ISPs
Moo-Ho Cheon, KRNICOrganizational Change in JPNIC
Izumi Okutani, JPNIC
Agenda – Reports(cont’d)NIR status Report
Son Tran, APNICIntroduction of TWNIC Web-based IP address management system
Tracy Tsai, TWNIC
Status of ISOC-IDMarcelus Ardiwinata, ISOC-ID
Agenda -discussionnew NIR structure (for discussion)
Paul Wilson, APNIC
Discussions in the meetingNew NIR StructureDatabase and registry system
New NIR Structure
NIR isNational Internet RegistryHad formed as “Country NIC” before APNIC launched Had redefined its function to cover cultural and linguistic gap between APNIC and LIRs
IssuesHaving allocation and allocating to LIR recursively causes fragmentation of IP addressMembership has no sufficient difference from ordinary LIR members
Fee structure, vote count,,,Proposed in the previous meeting in KL that we should discuss from “what is an NIR”
But little discussion has made till now
Discussion and ConclusionPaul Wilson presented a discussion stuff (not a proposal) that identified the issues around NIRs and example of possible solutionsActivate the discussion on this issue on nir-discuss mailing list
based on this stuff from nowDiscuss and develop some other proposal back in each NIREstablish a working group if needed after discussion on the list
Database and registry system
DiscussionTWNIC presented its recently developed web-based IP address management- application systemKRNIC has had like this for some yearsJPNIC is under planning the development of whole registry systemAPNIC has its systemIsn’t it redundant and wasteful to develop each own different systems?
ConclusionStart the discussion on the nir-discuss mailing list for collaboration of the development of registry system
Efficiency by synergy for each partySmooth coordination for DB synchronization
Discussion may kick off a Task Force for this project
Possible Collaboration with IRR activities
Wrapping up…Very active and constructive discussion and contribution
3.5 hour continuous meeting is longer than IPv6 session that was so hot
Nir-discuss mailing list is also open to everyone now!
Consult mailing-list web page for subscription
Thank you!!
Report of Open NIR Meetingat 12th APNIC Open Policy Meeting in Taipei
Questions?