Upload
phamque
View
220
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Report of investigation
into the incident on
man overboard from
river-trade cargo vessel
“Yue Feng 901” at
Western Anchorage No.1
In Hong Kong
on 11 March 2009
Purpose of Investigation
This incident is investigated, and published in accordance with the IMO Code for the
Investigation of Marine Casualties and Incidents promulgated under IMO Assembly
Resolution A.849(20). The purpose of this investigation conducted by the Marine Accident
Investigation and Shipping Security Policy Branch (MAISSPB) of Marine Department is to
determine the circumstances and the causes of the incident with the aim of improving the
safety of life at sea and avoiding similar incident in future.
The conclusions drawn in this report aim to identify the different factors contributing to the
incident. They are not intended to apportion blame or liability towards any particular
organization or individual except so far as necessary to achieve the said purpose.
The MAISSPB has no involvement in any prosecution or disciplinary action that may be
taken by the Marine Department resulting from this incident.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Table of Contents Page
Summary 1
Description of the Vessel 2
Sources of Evidence 3
Outline of Events 4
Analysis of Evidence 7
Conclusions 11
Recommendations 12
Submission 13
1.4 The investigation revealed the main contributory factors to the accident were:
1. Summary
1.1 An accident happened on board the Chinese registered river-trade cargo vessel Yue
Feng 901 at Western Anchorage No.1 in Hong Kong on 11 March 2009.
1.2 The accident happened when Yue Feng 901 was manoeuvring in the anchorage after
finish cargo loading. There was moderate breeze and small waves at sea.
1.3 At the time of the accident, the Chief Engineer was rigging the tarpaulin tent for
covering the cargo hold. He was standing on the tarpaulin at the starboard side on the
roof deck. The tarpaulin was suddenly blown up by wind and flipped causing him lost
balance and fell over the side of the deckhouse into the water. He was rescued and sent
to the hospital. He was certified dead later in the hospital.
the Chief Engineer rigged the tarpaulin tent when the vessel was manoeuvring,
which was an unsafe condition;
the Chief Engineer while working aloft and near to the ship side did not use safety
harness and lifeline and wearing lifejacket;
the Chief Engineer might have lowered his alertness on the hazards involved in the
operation of the rigging the tarpaulin tent.
1
Bridge deck
Aft deckhouse
2. Description of the Vessel
2.1 Particulars of Yue Feng 901
Port of Registry : Guangzhou, China
Registration No. : 090102001245
Type of Vessel : Container Cargo Ship
Year of Built : 2000
Built At : Guangzhou Zhujiang Shipyard, China
Owner of Vessel : Guangdong Province Pearl River Navigation Company Limited
Length : 49.90 metres
Breadth : 13.00 metres
Depth : 4.00 metres
Gross Tonnage : 972
Net Tonnage : 544
Engine Power : 440 kW
No. of Crew : 7
2.2 Yue Feng 901 is a steel hull, single-hold without hatch, container cargo ship operating
in the Pearl River Delta area (called river-trade ship). A tarpaulin tent is designed for
covering the cargo hold (see Fig.1). The vessel is designed with the fore and aft
deckhouses. The wheelhouse is located on top of the forward deckhouse where remote
control of main propulsion engine is provided. The crew accommodations are
distributed in the fore and aft deckhouses. The engine room is located in the aft part of
the vessel.
Tent tarpaulin covered the cargo hold
Fig. 1: River-Trade Cargo Vessel Yue Feng 901
2
3. Sources of Evidence
a) Statements provided by the crew of Yue Feng 901;
b) The weather report provided by the Hong Kong Observatory;
c) The autopsy report of the deceased provided by the Department of Health of
Hong Kong.
3
4. Outline of Events
4.1 Yue Feng 901 (the Vessel) departed from the port of Gao Ming in Guangdong, China
and arrived in Hong Kong in the morning on 10 March 2009. She was anchored in the
Yau Ma Tei Anchorage waiting for the loading instructions from the shipping
company.
4.1 The Vessel left the Yai Ma Tei Anchorage in the morning on 11 March 2009 and at
about 0900, the Vessel was alongside a dumb steel lighter Hoi Lung No. 2008, which
moored to the starboard side of an ocean-going ship anchored at the Western
Anchorage No.1. Steel sheet rolls were discharged from the ocean-going ship to the
Vessel by using the derrick crane of the dumb steel lighter.
4.2 At about 1300, the Vessel fully loaded with sixty-three (63) rolls of steel sheet (see
Fig.2) departed from the dumb steel lighter to let another river trade cargo ship come
alongside for loading. Before that, the Petty officer of the Vessel had gone onboard the
ocean-going ship to process the cargo documents.
Fig. 2: Steel Sheet Rolls Loaded in Cargo Hold of “Yue Feng 901”
4.3 While the Vessel was manoeuvring in the area waiting for the Petty Officer, the Chief
Engineer went to the roof deck of the aft deckhouse trying to cover the cargo hold by
rigging the tarpaulin tent which was stowed on the roof deck.
4.4 The Chief Engineer started the electric motor-driven winch located on the roof deck to
haul the gantline tight. After that, he operated another winch to slide the tarpaulin tent
out from its stowage position towards forward of the Vessel to cover the cargo hold.
4
4.5 While the Chief Engineer was rigging the tarpaulin tent, the Chief Officer, who was
working in the forward of the Vessel, shouted to stop the rigging operation of the
tarpaulin tent immediately as it was unsafe to do so while the Vessel was cruising. A
motorman ran up quickly to the roof deck and stopped the winch.
4.6 After the Petty Officer finished his paper work, the Vessel returned to fetch him. The
Vessel moored alongside the other river trade cargo ship that had been secured
alongside the dumb steel lighter.
4.7 After the Petty Officer returned onboard, the Vessel prepared to depart to an area in the
anchorage where it would be safe for covering the cargo hold by rigging the tarpaulin
tent.
4.8 At the time of the accident, there was moderate breeze and small waves at sea in the
anchorage. Wind was blowing towards port side of the ocean-going ship. At about
1345 when the Vessel had just departed, she lost shelter and exposed to wind on the
down side of the tied-up vessels. The Chief Officer saw the tarpaulin tent was
suddenly blown up and flipped. The Chief Engineer, who was standing on the
tarpaulin at the starboard side on the roof deck, lost balance and fell over the side of
the deckhouse into the water (see Fig. 3 & 4).
4.9 The crewmembers onboard the Vessel immediately threw three lifebuoys onto the
water trying to save the Chief Engineer. The Chief Officer jumped into water to tow
the Chief Engineer to the shipside. The crewmembers threw a rope to the Chief Officer
for him to fasten Chief Engineer’s body. Finally, the Chief Engineer was lifted up to
the main deck of the Vessel.
4.10 The Chief Engineer was unconscious when he was taken to the hospital by a fireboat
of the Fire Services Department. He was certified dead later in the hospital.
5
Tarpaulin
Roof deck of aft deckhouse
The Chief Engineer
Gantline
Fig. 3: The Deceased Stood on the Tarpaulin at the Time of Accident
“Yue Feng 901”
Aft deckhouse
Falling
Path
The deceased
Fig. 4: The Deceased Fell Overboard at the Time of Accident
6
5. Analysis of Evidence
Working experience & training
5.1 The Chief Engineer held Certificate of Competency issued by the Guangdong
Maritime Safety Administration of China for working onboard river-trade cargo
vessels.
5.2 The Chief Engineer had more than four years experience working as a Chief Engineer
onboard river-trade cargo ships. He worked on the Vessel for two years and therefore
he was considered competent to operate the winch system for the tarpaulin tent of the
Vessel.
Fatigue
5.3 The Vessel arrived Hong Kong in the morning on 10 March 2009 and started loading
of cargo in the morning on 11 March 2009. Normally, there was no engine room watch
at night for this type of vessel. Therefore, the Chief Engineer should have sufficient
rest while the Vessel was anchored in the Yau Ma Tei Anchorage waiting for the
loading instructions from the company. The Chief Engineer started working at about
0800 on 11 March 2009 until the time of accident at about 1345, he should not be
suffered from fatigue of work.
Environment
5.4 At the time of accident it was moderate breeze and small waves at sea in the Western
Anchorage. The Vessel could be swaying slightly by waves. Also, the partly rigged up
tarpaulin tent could be blown up easily by the wind.
Aft deckhouse
5.5 The aft deckhouse is about 2.4 meters in height above the main deck. Cabins for the
Chief Engineer, Motormen and sailors are located in the aft deckhouse. There is a steel
vertical ladder fitted to provide access to the roof deck of the aft deckhouse.
5.6 Steel I-beams are fitted on the roof deck for carrying containers. There are two
winches at the back of the roof deck for rigging the tarpaulin tent. One winch is used
for hauling the gantline wire rope and the other winch is for controlling the wire ropes
to open or close tarpaulin tent. The winch control panel is located at the port side on
the roof deck. A vertical steel frame fabricated by round steel pipes is installed for
preventing the containers hitting the winches and equipment at the back of the roof
7
deck. There is no side railings provided on the roof deck of the aft deckhouse. (see Fig.
5)
Gantline Vertical steel frame
Control panel Winches for for winchesrigging up
gantline and pulling tent
tarpaulin Steel frames to accommodate
container
Fig. 5: The Rooftop of Aft Deckhouse
Tarpaulin tent
5.7 The tarpaulin tent, 33 meters long and 8 meters wide, is bulky and heavy. When it is
stowed on the roof deck, it could not be easily blown up by the wind.
5.8 When the tarpaulin is partly rigged on the gantline without proper securing, the surface
area would make the tarpaulin prone to be moved by the strong wind.
Man overboard accident
5.9 The Chief Engineer had attempted to close the cargo hold by rigging the tarpaulin tent
earlier but the operation was stopped by the Chief Officer.
5.10 Immediately after the Vessel departed, the Chief Engineer was in a hurry again to go
up to the roof deck trying to rig the tarpaulin tent even though the vessel was still
manoeuvring in the Anchorage.
5.11 At the time of the accident, the Chief Engineer was standing at a position less than one
meter from the starboard side of the roof deck. There were no guard railings on the
roof deck and therefore he was in an unsafe position with high risk of falling from
height (see Fig. 6).
5.12 The tarpaulin tent was partly rigged up by the Chief Engineer earlier. Whilst
8
Safe working practices
attempting to rig the tent again, he stood on the tarpaulin. The tarpaulin was blown up
by a strong wind. He lost his balance and fell into the water.
The deceased
Tarpaulin
No guard railings on
starboard side of roof deck
Fig. 6: The Deceased Stood near the Open Edge
Human elements in the accident
5.13 It is likely that when a person is very familiar with a certain job, he would try to finish
the work in a hurry without sufficient awareness of the possible risks associated with
it. The Chief Engineer had done the operations of rigging the tarpaulin tent many times
and it would be probable that he was overconfident. In this case, the Chief Engineer
was trying to finish the tarpaulin tent quickly without realizing the risk involved while
the vessel was underway in a situation that there could be strong wind.
5.14 The Code of Practice on Using Protective Clothing and Equipment for Works on Local
Vessels issued by Hong Kong Marine Department in January 2007 stipulates that all
persons working at height (aloft), outboard, below decks or in any other area where
there is a risk of falling more than two metres, should wear a safety harness attached to
a lifeline as far as reasonably practicable.
5.15 Working aloft is risky. Personnel working at a height may not guard themselves
against falling when they give full attention to the job. Therefore, it is not advisable to
work aloft on board vessel when underway. As far as practicable, working aloft should
9
be done when the vessel is anchored or berth alongside. However, if the work has to be
done due to urgency, suitable safety measures such as wearing a safety harness
attached to a lifeline should be taken.
5.16 The Chief Engineer was working aloft on the roof deck and near to the shipside,
however, he did not use safety harness and lifeline and without wearing lifejacket.
Personal communication equipment
5.17 There was no portable personal communication equipment for the crew onboard. At
the time of the accident, the Chief Officer was in the Wheelhouse and the Chief
Enginer was working at the aft deckhouse. Without proper equipment,
communication between them would be difficult.
5.18 Provision of proper communication equipment such as walkie-talkie could improve
the safety at work during opening / closing of the tarpaulin tent onboard the Vessel.
Autopsy report
5.19 The autopsy report of the deceased provided by the Department of Health indicated
that the cause of the death was due to drowning.
10
6. Conclusions
6.1 An accident happened on board the Chinese registered river-trade cargo vessel Yue
Feng 901 at Western Anchorage No.1 in Hong Kong on 11 March 2009.
6.2 Yue Feng 901 was manoeuvring in the Anchorage after finish cargo loading. There
was moderate breeze and small waves at sea.
6.3 At the time of the accident, the Chief Engineer was rigging the tarpaulin tent for
covering the cargo hold. He was standing on the tarpaulin at the starboard side on the
roof deck. The tarpaulin was suddenly blown up by wind and flipped causing him lost
balance and fell over the side of the deckhouse into the water. He was rescued and sent
to the hospital. He was certified dead later in the hospital.
6.3 The investigation revealed the main contributory factors to the accident:
the Chief Engineer rigged the tarpaulin tent while the vessel was manoeuvring,
which was an safe condition;
the Chief Engineer while working aloft and near to the ship side did not use
safety harness and lifeline and wearing lifejacket;
the Chief Engineer might have lowered his alertness on the hazards involved in
the operation of the tarpaulin tent.
6.4 The other safety factors to the accident were:
there was no safety instructions onboard the Vessel for the operation of the
tarpaulin tent;
there was no personal communication equipment onboard the Vessel for use in
rigging the tarpaulin tent.
11
7. Recommendations
7.1 A copy of this report should be sent to the owner and Master of Yue Feng 901 advising
them the findings of the accident. They are required to:
provide safety instructions and personal communication equipment for the crew in
the operation of the tarpaulin tent;
instruct the crew members to use personal safety equipment when working aloft
and / or near the ship’s sides.
7.2 A copy of this report should be sent to Guangdong Maritime Safety Administration for
their information.
7.3 A Marine Department Notice should be issued to promulgate the lessons learnt from
this fatal accident.
12
8. Submissions
8.1 In the event that the conduct of any person or organization is criticized in an accident
investigation report, it is the policy of the Marine Department that a copy of the
relevant parts of the report is given to that person or organization so that he can have
an opportunity to rebut the criticism or offer evidence not previously available to the
investigating officer.
8.2 The final draft of the report was sent to the owner and Master of Yue Feng 901 for
comment. There was no comment received from them at the end of the consultation.
13