Report - DeKalb County, GA

625 Holcomb Bridge Road, Norcross, GA 30071 • 770-209-0029 • unitedconsulting.com

REPORT For DeKalb County Government | Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Affairs

Lead Based Paint and Asbestos Assessment DOT Maintenance Yard 817 George Luther Drive and 631 Durham Park Road Decatur, Georgia


17-GA-01348-02

December 8, 2017

Mr. Chris Bell Greenspace Planner + Project Manager DeKalb County Government | Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Affairs 3067 Chestnut Street, Building D Scottsdale, Georgia 30079

Via Email: [email protected]

RE: Report of Lead Based Paint and Asbestos Assessment DOT Maintenance Yard 817 George Luther Drive and 631 Durham Park Road Decatur, DeKalb County, Georgia Project No. 17-GA-01348-02

Dear Mr. Bell:

United Consulting has completed the Lead-Based Paint and Asbestos Sampling at the above referenced site located at 817 George Luther Drive and 631 Durham Park Road in Decatur, Georgia, hereinafter referred to as the Project Site. The testing activities were performed in substantial conformance with industry standards. We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with this project and look forward to assisting you with future projects. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

UNITED CONSULTING

Spencer C. Cox Timothy J. Beck, P.G. Project Environmental Specialist Executive Vice President

Russell C. Griebel, P.G., C.P.G. Executive Vice President

SCC/RCG/TJB/nm

SP: 17-GA-01348-02.asb.lbp


17-GA-01348-02Page 3 of 18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 7

2.1 Certifications ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................. 7

2.2.3 Modifications to Scope .......................................................................................................... 8 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ....................................................................................................... 9 4.0 INACCESSIBLE AREAS/LIMITING CONDITIONS ........................................................................ 10 5.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY .................................................................................................................... 11

5.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................... 11 5.2 Sample Location Selection ......................................................................................................... 11 5.3 Procedure .................................................................................................................................. 11 5.4 Bulk Sample Analysis ................................................................................................................ 11 5.5 Bulk Sample Results .................................................................................................................. 12

5.5.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 12 5.5.2 Asbestos Containing Materials ............................................................................................ 12 5.5.3 Asbestos Data Evaluation ................................................................................................... 12 5.5.4 Estimated Quantities ........................................................................................................... 14

6.0 LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY ..................................................................................................... 15 6.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................... 15 6.2 Sample Location Selection ......................................................................................................... 15 6.3 Procedures ................................................................................................................................ 15 6.4 Sample Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 15 6.5 Paint Testing Results ................................................................................................................. 16

6.5.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 16 6.5.2 Lead-Based Paint Evaluation .............................................................................................. 16

7.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................ 17 8.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 18

EXHIBITS

Exhibit 1 Summary of Positive Asbestos Bulk Sample Results Exhibit 2 Estimated Quantities of Suspect Materials

TABLES

Table 1 Summary of Asbestos Test Results Table 2 Lead Based Paint Sample Results

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Sample Location Plan – Building A & B Figure 3 Sample Location Plan – Building C


17-GA-01348-02Page 4 of 18

APPENDICES

Appendix A Photographic Documentation Appendix B Certifications Appendix C Laboratory Analytical Testing Results Appendix D Asbestos Notification Requirements


17-GA-01348-02Page 5 of 18

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY1

United Consulting has completed an Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey on the DeKalb DOT Maintenance Yard, located at the addresses of 817 George Luther Drive and 631 Durham Park Road in Decatur, DeKalb County, Georgia (herein referred to in this report as the Project Site). The results are briefly summarized below. The text of the report should be reviewed for a discussion of the following items:

General

• United Consulting utilized destructive sampling at the Project Site. Based on debris (tires)identified at Building E, limited observations could be made of the current interior condition of thestructure. United Consulting recommends that an inspector should revisit the Project Site aftercleanup and/or prior to demolition to determine if additional suspect areas, which were not readilyaccessible, need to be sampled. Potential for additional interior and exterior sampling usingdestructive sampling could be necessary prior to demolition/renovation activities that maycommence at the Project Site.

Asbestos Survey

• A total of 65 bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing materials were obtained from theProject Site. Thirteen of the samples, and associated layers, collected from the buildingswere found to contain regulated concentrations of asbestos fibers. The identified asbestoscontaining materials included floor tiles and associated mastics, exterior and interior caulking, andmirror mastics.

• The National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requires the removalof asbestos-containing materials prior to activities, which would disturb them. United Consultingrecommends that the asbestos-containing materials be removed prior to demolition, by a qualifiedasbestos abatement contractor using State of Georgia accredited personnel, in accordance withapplicable federal, state and local regulations governing the removal of asbestos-containingmaterial.

• A Ten-Day Notification must be forwarded to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources -Environmental Protection Division, by the building owner or demolition/renovation contractor, priorto the start of any building demolition/renovation activities.

1 This Executive Summary is not intended to be used or relied upon without reference to the entire report and cannot otherwise be properly understood and interpreted. It is provided solely for the convenience of the Client and not as a substitute for the report or review of the report.


17-GA-01348-02Page 6 of 18

Lead Based Paint Survey

• United Consulting performed a lead-based paint survey of the Project Site building to visuallyidentify suspect lead-based paint films on interior and exterior building components. Seventeenrepresentative paint chip samples were collected from the Project Site and submitted forlaboratory testing.

• The painted surfaces identified at the Project Site were generally in poor to fair condition at thetime of United Consulting’s survey activities. One exterior sample obtained from Building Awas found to contain lead-based paint above the current Department of Housing and UrbanDevelopment (HUD) action level of 0.5% lead by weight. The sample was obtained from thegarage bay tan trim and was found to be in poor condition.

• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations require that workers beprotected from exposure to lead via proper engineering controls and appropriate levels ofpersonal protective equipment. Additionally, lead-based painted waste materials must be testedfor hazardous characteristics using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLPmethod), prior to disposal. Solid waste which leaches hazardous concentrations of lead greaterthan 5.0 parts per million (ppm) by TCLP, must be properly disposed of in an appropriate permittedlandfill.

• United Consulting recommends that identified lead-based paint be abated prior to demolition.


17-GA-01348-02Page 7 of 18

2.0 INTRODUCTION

United Consulting was retained by DeKalb County to perform sampling for Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) and Lead Based Paint (LBP). The purpose of this survey was to collect and test representative samples of common building materials for the presence of asbestos fibers and collect and test representative paint films for lead from painted surfaces that may be present at the Project Site. Photographs of the Project Site structures are included in Appendix B.

2.1 Certifications

The asbestos bulk sample collection activities and lead-based paint survey were performed by United Consulting representative, Mr. Spencer Cox. Mr. Cox is accredited as an Asbestos Inspector in accordance with the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), Inspector Certificate Number 16347. Mr. Cox is also a licensed lead based paint inspector with the State of Georgia, Certification Number 60 INSO 1017-10019. These certifications and that of the laboratory used for this investigation are reproduced in Appendix C.

2.2 Scope of Work

The scope of this assessment was outlined in United Consulting’s proposal dated August 7, 2017, which was executed by the client on November 2, 2017. In performing this assessment, United Consulting conducted the following activities:

1. Visually examine the accessible areas of the structures to identify suspect asbestos containingmaterials (SACM) which could be impacted by possible renovation/demolition activities;

2. Physically examine suspect materials to evaluate whether the materials were friable or non-friable(a friable material is any material that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to apowder using hand pressure);

3. Describe the suspect material and note the areas where the material was located;

4. Conduct sampling of identified SACM and submit samples to an independent laboratory foranalysis; of which a maximum of 87 samples have been authorized;

5. Conduct sampling of representative paint films from within the Project Site structures andsubmitted samples to an independent laboratory for analysis of lead; of which a maximum of 32samples have been authorized; and

6. Prepare this report of the sampling activities and findings.


17-GA-01348-02Page 8 of 18

2.2.3 Modifications to Scope

• United Consulting observed the two shed structures on the Project Site, further discussed withinthis report, for potential SACM and paint coatings. Both of the structures did not contain visibleSACM, or paint coatings that could be sampled.


17-GA-01348-02Page 9 of 18

3.0 DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES

The Project Site contained five buildings as described below:

• Building A is a single-story steel construction located on the northwestern corner of the ProjectSite. It is referenced by the address of 817 George Luther Drive and is approximately 3,000square feet in size. The building previously was utilized for vehicle maintenance, fueling depo,and training. The structure shell and roof are constructed of metal sheeting with a yellow powdercoating. Interior rooms were built out utilizing wood frame studs and drywall. Flooring systemsconsisted of concrete and roofing was visible above. Ceiling tiles were once located in theconference room; however, they have weathered, fallen to the floor, and become friable.

• Building B is a two-story wood construction located along George Luther Drive in the centerportion of the parcel. It is referenced by the address of 819 George Luther Drive and isapproximately 4,000 square feet in size. The building previously was utilized as offices with awalkout basement level utilized for storage. The structure shell consisted of brick facades with atypical shingle roof. Interior rooms consisted of wood frame studs and drywall. Flooring systemsconsisted of floor tiles and bare OSB subflooring. Ceilings were finished with removable tiles anddrywall systems. Doors to the structure as well as various walls throughout the building weredemolished or damaged due to vandalism.

• Building C is a two-story steel construction located within the center of the Project Site. It isreferenced by the address of 819 George Luther Drive and is approximately 5,600 square feet insize. The building previously was utilized for vehicle maintenance, fueling, and offices. Thestructure shell was roof are constructed of metal sheeting with a yellow powder coating. Interiorrooms were built out utilizing wood frame studs and drywall. Flooring systems within themaintenance bays consisted of concrete. Flooring within the office portion consisted of floor tileand OSB subflooring on the second floor. Ceilings were finished with removable tiles and drywallsystems in the office areas. Ceilings within the maintenance bays were exposed to the roofline.

• Buildings D is a pole barn consisting of timber supports and a partially destroyed metal roof. Thestructure is located on the south central portion of Project Site along George Luther Drive. Nobuilding materials were identified that would contain suspect asbestos-containing materials(SACM). Wood timbers appeared to be stained green. No visible coatings or films were observedthat could be sampled.

• Building E is a single-story wood frame open air structure located on the southern portion of theProject Site. The flooring consisted of concrete and the perimeter walls were six-foot-high stemconcrete walls with wood framing up to the roofline. The roofing systems consisted of metalsheeting. No building materials were visually identified that would contain SACM. Wood productswithin the structure appeared to be stained. No visible coatings or films were observed that couldbe sampled.

It is our understanding that the client intends to demolish the structures. Buildings D and E were not sampled as part of this assessment as suspect media was not identified. The location of the Project Site is shown on Figure 1. Interior photographs of the Project Site structure are found in Appendix A.


17-GA-01348-02 Page 10 of 18

4.0 INACCESSIBLE AREAS/LIMITING CONDITIONS

The Project Site was not occupied during the sampling event. For this reason, United Consulting employed destructive sampling techniques to obtain representative samples for demolition. The roofing samples were obtained from already damaged portions of applicable roofing systems. Temporary patching was utilized in areas as applicable. Cinder block walls were observed within Building B and C. One select location within each of the buildings were assessed for insulating fill, which may contain asbestos fibers, by breaking a hole in the block at the lowest point. No ACM fill was observed within each of these locations. These locations are shown on Figure 2 and 3 of this report.

Building E, at time of our assessment, was filled with discarded tires and was not accessible. Previously, United Consulting visited the Project Site in June 2015 and 2017 to conduct Brownfield site characterization sampling. At the time of those investigations, Building E did not contain SACM. This building should be inspected once debris (tires) are removed to verify that those conditions have not changed. This is a limiting condition of this assessment.


17-GA-01348-02 Page 11 of 18

5.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY

5.1 Overview

Asbestos is the name given to a number of naturally occurring, fibrous silicate minerals mined for their useful properties such as thermal insulation, chemical and thermal stability, and high tensile strength. Bulk sampling was performed in substantial conformance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA's), "Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings" (EPA 560/5-85-024, 1985). Bulk sampling was performed at the Project Site, on November 16 and 17, 2017 by Mr. Spencer Cox.

5.2 Sample Location Selection

Sample locations were randomly chosen in the field, based on the identification of suspect asbestos-containing material (SACM). A distributed sampling plan based on a randomized sampling scheme was not used for this sampling program. Samples were collected from areas deemed safe and accessible.

Bulk samples were collected from typical suspect materials such as drywall, vinyl floor tile, mastics, thermal system insulation (TSI), linoleum flooring and mastics, ceiling tiles, textured ceiling materials, and other suspect materials. Bulk samples were not collected of non-suspect materials such as drapes, wood, fiberglass insulation or ceramic tiles.

5.3 Procedure

Samples were collected by wetting the material to be sampled, by extracting a representative section of the suspect material and by placing the material in a sample container. Each sample was assigned a unique sample number and delivered to an independent laboratory (Analytical Environmental Services, Inc.) for analysis. Chain-of-Custody was documented and retained on-file. The laboratory results are attached in Appendix C. The locations of the bulk samples collected during this survey are found on Figure 2 and 3.

5.4 Bulk Sample Analysis

The bulk samples were tested for detectable concentrations of asbestos (greater than one percent asbestos) utilizing Polarized PLM and dispersion staining techniques. All analyses were performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA 600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993. Materials containing one percent or more asbestos are considered asbestos containing materials (ACM) and are regulated. Bulk sample testing was performed by Analytical Environmental Services, Inc., a successful participant in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), lab code 102082-0 (Expiration date September 30, 2018).


17-GA-01348-02 Page 12 of 18

5.5 Bulk Sample Results

5.5.1 General

United Consulting collected 65 bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials (SACM) from the Project Site structures during this sampling event. Many of the bulk samples collected contained several layers, which needed to be individually analyzed. The items included flooring tiles, drywall materials, ceiling tiles, caulking, mastics, and roofing materials. The survey results discussed below have been compiled by material location. Photocopies of the Laboratory Results are included in Appendix C. Sample locations are listed in the tables below. Below in Exhibit 1 is a summary of regulated asbestos containing materials (RACM) identified at the Project Site. A summary of the remaining bulk sample results is presented in Table 1.

EXHIBIT 1 – SUMMARY OF POSITIVE ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE RESULTS

Structure RACM Location Technique Building A Maintenance Building • None identified -

Destructive Sampling

Building B Office Building

• Floor Tiles & Black Mastics• Mirror Mastics• Caulking, Exterior & Interior

Throughout Building


Building C Maintenance Building • Floor Tiles & Black Mastics First Floor


Note: RACM – Regulated asbestos containing materials

5.5.2 Asbestos Containing Materials

Regulated asbestos containing materials were identified within Building B and C on the Project Site. Thirteen of the 65 collected samples were found to contain regulated concentrations of asbestos fibers.

5.5.3 Asbestos Data Evaluation

Regulated concentrations of asbestos fibers were identified within samples collected from the Project Site. The locations of the asbestos containing materials were variable, including floor tile and/or associated mastics, mirror mastics, and interior/exterior caulking.

Specifically, floor tile mastics on the first floor within Building C were identified as being ACM. As the backing material cannot readily be separated from the tile flooring, the entire flooring systems on the first floor should be treated as ACM. Floor tile within the second floor was not identified as ACM and was backed with glue adhesives (non-ACM) verses black mastic (ACM). Mirror mastics identified within each of the bathrooms within Building C were identified as ACM.


17-GA-01348-02 Page 13 of 18

Floor tile and associated black mastics were located on the first floor and portions of the basement within Building B. As the backing material cannot readily be separated from the tile flooring, the entire flooring systems should be treated as ACM. Portions of the basement included floor tile that was backed with glue adhesives. The adhesives and the black mastics were comingled and were not consistent. Therefore, the entire flooring system within the office building should be treated as ACM. Caulking sampled from window interior and exterior components were sporadic and deteriorating. All caulking in the building should be treated as ACM.

Building D & E located on the west-central and southern portion of the Project Site were observed to not contain SACM as indicated in Section 4.0 of this report.

In the event that suspect ACM are encountered within previously inaccessible building areas (within block walls, etc.) at the time of demolition, United Consulting should be contacted and proper samples of the suspect materials should be collected and submitted for testing, prior to continuing demolition activities which could disturb these materials and potentially result in an asbestos fiber release.

The National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requires the removal of ACM prior to activities, which would disturb them. United Consulting recommends that the asbestos-containing materials be removed, prior to demolition by a qualified asbestos abatement contractor, using State of Georgia accredited personnel, in accordance with applicable federal, state and local regulations governing the removal of asbestos-containing material.

A Ten-Day Notification should be forwarded to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD), by the building owner or demolition contractor prior to the start of any building demolition activities.

A Georgia licensed Asbestos Removal Contractor should be employed to remove asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and appropriately contain, transport, and dispose of asbestos containing waste materials. Friable material (such as pipe insulation) should be appropriately addressed in a timely manner, whether any demolition or renovation is planned or not. ACM that is not friable (e.g., floor tile and mastic) should be addressed before any demolition or renovation work begins.


17-GA-01348-02 Page 14 of 18

Not For Bidding Purposes

Contractor Responsible for Quantity Calculations

5.5.4 Estimated Quantities

Below in Exhibit 2 lists the identified RACM and estimates of quantities based on visual observations by the inspector at time of sampling. The black mastic adhesives for the mirrors appeared to be small dabs of material to adhere the mirror to the wall prior to bracket installation. The adhesives sampled were a small one inch square of material. Flooring tile systems and mastics were not readily separated and glues (identified as not RACM) were not consistent with black mastics (identified as RACM) between sampling areas. Based on this, the below estimated quantity takes into account the entirety of visible floor tile systems. Caulking identified and sampled was sporadic and in fair to poor condition. Caulking estimated is based on visually sampled areas.

EXHIBIT 2 – ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF RACM

LOCATION MATERIALS ESTIMATED QUANTITY

Building B (Two Story Office Building) First Floor Office Areas 12” Floor Tile (Dark Brown) and Black Mastics 1,800 square feet

Basement Hallway & Front Office Area 12” Floor Tile (Dark Brown) and Black Mastics 1,200 square feet

Interior and Exterior Windows/Doors Caulking, tan and white ≤ 15 linear feet total*

Building C (Maintenance Building) Bathrooms Black Mastics; associated with floor tile 100 square feet

First Floor Office Areas Black Mastics; associated with floor tile 480 square feet Bathrooms Black Adhesive; associated with mirrors ≤ 5 square/ft total

Notes: NA: Not Applicable The quantities provided are estimates only based on observations made in the field as well as the drawings provided. United Consulting shall not be held responsible for errors, miscalculations, assumptions, misinterpretations or other problems or liabilities arising from, or associated with, firms or individuals bidding on asbestos abatement work that rely solely, or in part, on this document. *based on limited visual observations of exterior windows.


17-GA-01348-02 Page 15 of 18

6.0 LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY

6.1 Overview

Lead is a highly toxic metal that affects virtually every system of the body. LBP is defined as any paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that has 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm²) (or 5,000 micrograms per gram (ug/g) or 0.5% by weight) or more of lead. The purpose of the Lead-Based Paint testing was to visually identify suspect lead-based paint films at the Project Site, and to test the paint films for detectable concentrations of lead by collecting representative paint chip samples from the Project Site. United Consulting performed the survey in substantial conformance to industry standards. Sampling was performed at the Project Site on November 16, 2017 by Mr. Spencer Cox.

6.2 Sample Location Selection

Destructive paint chip sampling was employed to obtain representative samples for analysis. Sample locations were randomly chosen in the field, based on location, type, and color for potential demolition purposes.

6.3 Procedures

Paint film samples were obtained by either cutting or coring the film and substrate materials. Each sample was removed using a clean knife or core, and placed in a new dedicated container. Each container was assigned a unique sample number and delivered to an independent laboratory for analysis. Chain-of-Custody was documented and retained on-file. United Consulting performed the sampling in substantial conformance to industry standards.

6.4 Sample Analysis

The film samples were tested for total lead using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) techniques by National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) method 7082. The testing was performed by Analytical Environmental Services, Inc., accreted through the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs (AIHA-LAP, LLC), lab code 100671. Copies of chain of custodies are included with the laboratory report in Appendix C.


17-GA-01348-02 Page 16 of 18

6.5 Paint Testing Results

6.5.1 General

A total of 17 paint chip samples were collected during the site visit from the Project Site structures. These samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of lead. Sample descriptions and analytical results are summarized in Table 2. Photocopies of the laboratory results are included in Appendix A.

6.5.2 Lead-Based Paint Evaluation

One exterior trim sample from Building A was found to contain lead at concentrations above the current HUD action level of 0.5% by weight. This sample was located along the garage bay door tan trim and was found to be in poor condition. The remaining samples were below the laboratory reporting limit for lead.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations require that workers be protected from exposure to lead at any concentration via proper engineering controls and appropriate levels of personal protective equipment as per Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926.62 (29 CFR 1926.62).

Solid waste which leaches hazardous concentrations of lead greater than 5.0 parts per million (ppm) by TCLP, must be properly disposed of in an appropriately permitted hazardous waste landfill. Samples should be obtained and submitted for TCLP analysis for any confirmed lead based painted material which is to be brought to a landfill for disposal. The building owner or renovation contractor must forward a proper Ten Day Notification to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division (EPD) prior to the start of any building renovation/demolition activities.


17-GA-01348-02 Page 17 of 18

7.0 CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this survey, asbestos containing building materials were identified at the Project Site. A qualified asbestos abatement contractor will be required to remove the identified asbestos containing materials prior to renovation/demolition work.

Estimated ACM Quantities: Floor Tile/Mastic: Mastics: Caulking:

± 3,600 sq./ft ≤ 5 sq./ft total ≤ 15 linear feet total

Please note the abatement contractor must satisfy himself that the provided estimated quantities represent actual conditions. The provided quantities shall not be relied upon for bidding purposes.

Based on occupancy of one of the buildings, non-destructive sampling was conducted to minimize exposure to suspect materials and to limit interference with operations of the facility. United Consulting recommends that an inspector should revisit the Project Site prior to demolition to determine if additional suspect areas, which were not readily accessible, need to be sampled. Potential for additional interior and exterior sampling using destructive sampling could be necessary prior to demolition/renovation activities that may commence at the Project Site.

The building owner or demolition contractor must forward a proper Ten Day Notification to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division (EPD) prior to the start of any building renovation/demolition activities.

Lead-based paint film was identified above the HUD action level of 0.5% at the Project Site. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations require that workers be protected from exposure to lead via proper engineering controls and appropriate levels of personal protective equipment as per Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926.62 (29 CFR 1926.62). Samples should be obtained and submitted for TCLP analysis for any confirmed lead based painted material, which is to be brought to a landfill for disposal. United Consulting recommends that the identified lead be abated prior to demolition.


17-GA-01348-02 Page 18 of 18

8.0 LIMITATIONS

The conclusions presented in this Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Report are based on the laboratory results and condition of the materials identified. Asbestos and Lead concentrations will vary between sample locations. Our assessment of the materials at the Project Site is a professional opinion arrived at through the method and procedures accepted by and standard to the industry. No other warranty or guarantee is expressed or implied.

Representative areas of the Project Site were sampled on a limited basis. Preparation of abatement design bid documents or scopes of work for abatement, may require additional sampling and definition of the extent of the material. United Consulting shall not be held responsible for errors, miscalculations, assumptions, misinterpretations or other problems or liabilities arising from, or associated with, firms or individuals bidding on asbestos abatement work that rely solely, or in part, on this document.

This report has been prepared on behalf of the client. Should any other person, partnership, or corporation desire to rely upon this report, it will be necessary for United Consulting to update the report for the new user.

UNITED CONSULTING


Tables


TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS TEST RESULTS

Sample No. Component Location Friability/

Condition Asbestos (%)

Building A - Northwest Metal Building

A-1 Ceiling Tile Conference Room Friable ND A-2 Ceiling Tile Bathroom Friable ND A-23 Drywall + Joint Compound Conference Room Friable ND A-24 Drywall Tape Conference Room Friable ND A-25 Exterior Caulk Automotive Bay Non-Friable ND

Building C – Maintenance Building A-3 Insulation Automotive Bay Non-Friable ND A-4 Floor Tile, 12” Black 2nd Floor, Office Non-Friable ND A-4a Glue 2nd Floor, Office Non-Friable ND A-5 Floor Tile, 12” Tan Bathroom Non-Friable ND

A-5a Black Mastic Bathroom Non-Friable 3% CH A-6 Floor Tile, 12” Tan Second Bathroom Non-Friable ND

A-6a Black Mastic Second Bathroom Non-Friable 3% CH

A-7 Ceiling Tile 2nd Floor, Hall Friable ND A-8 Drywall 2nd Floor, Office #2 Friable ND A-9 Drywall + Joint Compound 2nd Floor, Office #2 Friable ND A-10 Joint Compound 2nd Floor, Office #2 Friable ND A-11 Drywall Office Friable ND A-12 Ceiling Tile Front Room Friable ND A-13 Cove Base, Black Office Non-Friable ND A-14 Mirror Mastic, Black Bathroom Non-Friable 5% CH A-15 Mirror Mastic, Black Bathroom Non-Friable 5% CH A-16 Caulking 2nd Floor, Office Non-Friable ND A-17 Floor Tile, 12” Brown/Tan Office Non-Friable ND A-17a Glue Office Non-Friable ND A-18 Cove Base, Black Front Room Non-Friable ND A-19 Drywall Front Room Friable ND A-20 Drywall + Joint Compound Rear Room Friable ND A-21 Floor Tile, 12” Tan Office Non-Friable ND

A-21a Black Mastic Office Non-Friable 3% CH A-22 Exterior Caulking Rear Room Non-Friable ND

Building B – Two Story Office Building A-26 Drywall Office Friable ND A-27 Drywall Office Friable ND A-28 Drywall + Tape Office Friable ND A-29 Drywall Office Friable ND




A-30 Cove Base, Black Office Non-Friable ND A-31 Floor Tile, 12” Black Office Non-Friable 3% CH A-31a Black Mastic Office Non-Friable 5% CH

A-32 Floor Tile, 12” Black/Brown Office Non-Friable 3% CH

A-32a Black Mastic Office Non-Friable 5% CH A-33 Drywall + Joint Compound Office Friable ND A-34 Joint Compound Office Friable ND A-35 Ceiling Tile, Pink Backed Office Friable ND A-36 Cove Base, Black Office Non-Friable ND A-37 Caulk, White Office Non-Friable ND

A-38 Floor Tile, 12” Black/Brown Office Non-Friable 3% CH

A-38a Black Mastic Office Non-Friable 5% CH A-39 Ceiling Tile, Pink Backed Office Friable ND A-40 Vinyl Partition Office Non-Friable ND A-41 Floor Tile, 8” Dark Brown Office Non-Friable 3% CH A-41a Black Mastic Office Non-Friable 5% CH A-42 Vinyl Partition Office Non-Friable ND A-43 Stair Trend Stairwell Non-Friable ND

A-44 Exterior Caulk, Tan Second Story Ext. Non-Friable 5% CH

A-45 Exterior Caulk, White Second Story Ext. Non-Friable 5% CH

A-46 Textured Joint Compound Bathroom Friable ND A-47 Interior Caulk, White Office Friable 5% CH A-48 Textured Joint Compound Bathroom Friable ND A-49 Roof, Tar Paper Second Story Ext. Non-Friable ND A-50 Roof, Shingle Second Story Ext. Non-Friable ND A-51 Cove Base, Black Office Non-Friable ND A-52 Floor Tile, 12” Dark Brown Hallway Non-Friable 3% CH A-52a Black Mastic Hallway Non-Friable 5% CH A-53 Ceiling Tile, Pink Backed Loading Dock Friable ND A-54 Ceiling Tile, Pink Backed Storage Area Friable ND A-55 Cove Base, Brown Office Non-Friable ND A-56 Floor Tile, 12” Black Office Non-Friable ND A-56a Glue Office Friable ND A-57 Floor Tile, 12” Black Office Non-Friable ND A-57a Glue Office Friable ND A-58 Plaster Bathroom Friable ND A-59 Plaster Hallway Friable ND A-60 Stair Cover Stairwell Non-Friable ND A-61 Exterior Window Caulk Exterior North Non-Friable ND A-62 Exterior Felt Exterior North Non-Friable ND




A-63 Exterior Awning, West Roofing Stairwell Non-Friable ND

A-64 Exterior Awning, East Roofing Stairwell Non-Friable ND

A-65 Exterior Tar Paper, Roof Second Story Ext. Non-Friable ND ND=None Detected CH=Chrysotile Highlight = Asbestos Containing * Sample result obtained via Point Counting due to initial result of < 1% Chrysotile


TABLE 2 – LEAD BASED PAINT SAMPLE RESULTS

Sample No. Location Color Lead by Weight (%)

Building C – Maintenance Building L-1 Garage Interior Red BRL L-2 Garage Interior (Cinder) Black BRL L-3 Women’s Door Tan/Green BRL L-4 Staircase Cream BRL L-5 Office Wall White BRL L-6 Door Grey BRL L-7 Door jam Grey 0.0263 L-8 Men’s Door Black BRL

Building A - Northwest Metal Building L-9 Interior Wall Tan BRL L-10 Exterior Wall Cream BRL L-11 Exterior Garage Bay Trim Tan 18.4

Building B – Two Story Office Building L-12 Wall Cream BRL L-13 Wallpaper Wall Cream BRL L-14 Wall White BRL L-15 Door Frame White BRL L-16 Wall (Cinder) White/Yellow 0.0722 L-17 Wall White 0.0694

Bolded items indicate a lead concentration above the current HUD action level of 0.5% lead by weight BRL= Not detected at the Reporting Limit


Figures

Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,

FIG. 1Title:

Project:

Client:

Prepared:Checked:

Date:

SCC

SCC

12/06/17

Site Location Map

DeKalb DOT Yard

DeKalb County

Figure Scale

±

Project Site

17-GA-01348-02Project No.0 3,0001,500

1 inch = 2,000 feet

BUILDING A

BUILDING B

BUILDING C


APPENDIX A

Photographic Documentation

Photo: View of Building D from the road access. Photo: View of a small sitting area outside of the office building with no SACM.

Photo: View of the Office building from the road. Photo: View of ACM floor tiles within the office building.

Property: DeKalb DOT Yard

Site Photographs

Location: George Luther Drive

Client: DeKalb County

Project Number: 17-1348-02

Photo: View of ACM floor tile on the landing and in the basement level. Photo: View of comingled ACM floor tile/mastic and non-ACM glues within the basement front room.

Photo: View of loading dock room within the office building. Photo: View of the maintenance building exterior.


Site Photographs




Photo: View of the rooms area of the maintenance building. Photo: ACM fill check along wall in maintenance building.

Photo: View of ACM floor tile and mastics within the maintenance building. Photo: View of fiberglass insulation along the front room of the maintenance building.


Site Photographs




Photo: View of Building A along the northwest corner of the Project Site. Photo: View of the tan trim paint which was tested to be positive for LBP.

Photo: View of the conference room within Building A. Photo: View of the bathrooms and storage room within Building A.


Site Photographs





APPENDIX B

Certifications


APPENDIX C

Laboratory Results and Chain of Custody

ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 3785 Presidential Pkwy., Atlanta, GA 30340-3704

12 r'4: S (770) 457-8177 /Toll Free (800) 972-4889 / Fax (770) 457-8188 CHAIN OF CUSTODY

BULK ANALYSIS

Client Name: United Consultina Phone:

Address:

City, State, Zip:

Contact:

625 Holcomb Bridge Road Fax: (770) 582 - 2900

Norcross, Georgia, 30071 Project Name: DeKalb DOT Yard

Spencer Cox Project Number: 17-GA-01348-03

Received by: Date/Time:

Relinquished by: Date/Time:

Received by: Date/Time:

- For AES use

FOR LAB USE ONLY

Lab Recipient d,'d?~~~ $/ez(ln( DateITime: I l ~ % . 1 7 I O . C / ~ Method of shipment [ ,I;?&

Page 1 of 22

ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 3785 Presidential Pkwy., Atlanta, GA 30340-3704

I\ r,; S (770) 457-8177 /Toll Free (800) 972-4889 / Fax (770) 457-8188 CHAIN OF CUSTODY

BULK ANALYSIS

Client Name: United Consulting Phone: (770) 842 - 8956

Address: 625 Holcomb Bridge Road Fax: (770) 582 - 2900

City, State, Zip: Norcross, Georgia, 30071 Project Name: DeKalb DOT Yard

Contact: Spencer Cox Project Number: 17-GA-01348-03

Sampler's Name Sampling Date: 11/16/2017

Relinquished by:

Received by:

Relinquished by: DateITime:

Received by: DateITime:

FOR LAB USE ONLY

Lab Recipient uAl(~grX 5 e- Date/Time: 1 l -so-\ Method of Shipment

Page 2 of 22

ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 3785 Pres~dential Pkwy., Atlanta, GA 30340-3704

nr;s (770) 457-8177 /Toll Free (800) 972-4889 / Fax (770) 457-8188 CHAIN OF CUSTODY

BULK ANALYSIS

Client Name: United Consulting Phone:

Address: 625 Holcomb Bridge Road Fax:

City, State, Zip:

Contact:

Norcross, Georgia, 30071 Project Name: DeKalb DOT Yard

Spencer Cox Project Number: 17-GA-01348-03

Relinquished by:

v Received by: Date/Time:

Relinquished by:

Received by:

FOR LAB USE ONLY

Lab Recipient DateITirne: 1f.P '" PW Method o f Shipment [?,'

Page 3 of 22

ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

27-Nov-17

Bulk Sample Summary ReportLab Code 102082-0

AES Job Number:

Project Number:Project Name:

Client Name:

LocationClient ID AES ID Asbestos Mineral Percentage Comments

1711J47

DEKALB DOT YARD 17-GA-01348-03

United Consulting Group Inc.

AMCH CR AN TR AC

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDISMS-Ceiling Tile1711J47-

001AA-1

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDISMS-Ceiling Tile1711J47-

002AA-2

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDISGMS-Insulation1711J47-

003AA-3

Layer:

1

Floor tileNDNDNDNDNDNDISGMS-Black 12x121711J47-

004AA-4

Layer:

2

GlueNDNDNDNDNDNDISGMS-Black 12x121711J47-

004AA-4

Layer:

1

Floor tileNDNDNDNDNDNDISGMS-Tan 12x121711J47-

005AA-5

Layer:

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite

ND = None Detected

For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.

AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab

Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA

600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building

Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.

These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.

PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently

the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.

This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services, Inc .

Microanalyst: QC Analyst:

Yelena KhaninaElena Ivanova

Page 4 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

2

GlueNDNDNDNDNDNDISGMS-Tan 12x121711J47-

005AA-5

Layer:

3

Black MasticNDNDNDNDND3ISGMS-Tan 12x121711J47-

005AA-5

Layer:

1

Floor tileNDNDNDNDNDNDISGMS-Tan 12x121711J47-

006AA-6

Layer:

2

GlueNDNDNDNDNDNDISGMS-Tan 12x121711J47-

006AA-6

Layer:

3

Black MasticNDNDNDNDND3ISGMS-Tan 12x121711J47-

006AA-6

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDISGMS-Ceiling Tile1711J47-

007AA-7

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 5 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDDrywall1711J47-

008AA-8

Layer:

2


008AA-8

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDDrywall + Skim JC1711J47-

009AA-9

Layer:

2


009AA-9

Layer:

3


009AA-9

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDSkim JC1711J47-

010AA-10

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 6 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDSkim JC1711J47-

010AA-10

Layer:

1


011AA-11

Layer:

2


011AA-11

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDCeiling Tile1711J47-

012AA-12

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDCove Base (black)1711J47-

013AA-13

Layer:

2


013AA-13

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 7 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

1

NDNDNDNDND5Mirror Mastic (Mens)1711J47-

014AA-14

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDND5Mirror Mastic (Women)1711J47-

015AA-15

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDCaulking 2nd Floor1711J47-

016AA-16

Layer:

1

Floor tileNDNDNDNDNDNDBrown/Tan 12x121711J47-

017AA-17

Layer:

2

GlueNDNDNDNDNDNDBrown/Tan 12x121711J47-

017AA-17

Layer:

1


018AA-18

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 8 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

2


018AA-18

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDDrywall1711J47-

019AA-19

Layer:

2


019AA-19

Layer:

3


019AA-19

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDDrywall Skim JC1711J47-

020AA-20

Layer:

2


020AA-20

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 9 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

3


020AA-20

Layer:

1

Floor tileNDNDNDNDNDNDTan 12x12 FT1711J47-

021AA-21

Layer:

2

GlueNDNDNDNDNDNDTan 12x12 FT1711J47-

021AA-21

Layer:

3

Black MasticNDNDNDNDND3Tan 12x12 FT1711J47-

021AA-21

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDCaulking Ext1711J47-

022AA-22

Layer:

1


023AA-23

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 10 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

2


023AA-23

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDDrywall Tape1711J47-

024AA-24

Layer:

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDDrywall Tape1711J47-

024AA-24

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDCaulk Ext1711J47-

025AA-25

Layer:

1


026AA-26

Layer:

2


026AA-26

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 11 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

1


027AA-27

Layer:

2


027AA-27

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDDrywall + Tape1711J47-

028AA-28

Layer:

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDDrywall + Tape1711J47-

028AA-28

Layer:

1


029AA-29

Layer:

2


029AA-29

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 12 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

1


030AA-30

Layer:

2


030AA-30

Layer:

1

Dark brown floor tileNDNDNDNDND3FT Black 12x121711J47-

031AA-31

Layer:

2

Black MasticNDNDNDNDND5FT Black 12x121711J47-

031AA-31

Layer:

1

Dark brown floor tileNDNDNDNDND3FT Black Speck 12x121711J47-

032AA-32

Layer:

2

Black MasticNDNDNDNDND5FT Black Speck 12x121711J47-

032AA-32

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 13 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDDrywall + JC1711J47-

033AA-33

Layer:

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDDrywall + JC1711J47-

033AA-33

Layer:

3

NDNDNDNDNDNDDrywall + JC1711J47-

033AA-33

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDJoint Compound1711J47-

034AA-34

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDCeiling Tile (pink)1711J47-

035AA-35

Layer:

1


036AA-36

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 14 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

2


036AA-36

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDCaulk1711J47-

037AA-37

Layer:

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDCaulk1711J47-

037AA-37

Layer:

1


038AA-38

Layer:

2


038AA-38

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDCeiling Tile (Pink)1711J47-

039AA-39

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 15 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDVinyl Partion1711J47-

040AA-40

Layer:

1


041AA-41

Layer:

2


041AA-41

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDVinyl Partion1711J47-

042AA-42

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDStair Tredi1711J47-

043AA-43

Layer:

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDStair Tredi1711J47-

043AA-43

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 16 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

1

NDNDNDNDND5Caulk, Ext.1711J47-

044AA-44

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDND5Caulk, Ext.1711J47-

045AA-45

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDTextured Wall JC1711J47-

046AA-46

Layer:

2


046AA-46

Layer:

3


046AA-46

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDND5Caulk, Int1711J47-

047AA-47

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 17 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

1


048AA-48

Layer:

2


048AA-48

Layer:

3


048AA-48

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDRoof, Tar Paper1711J47-

049AA-49

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDRoof Shingles1711J47-

050AA-50

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDCove base Black1711J47-

051AA-51

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 18 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDCove base Black1711J47-

051AA-51

Layer:

1

Dark brown floor tileNDNDNDNDND3FT 12x12 Black Spec1711J47-

052AA-52

Layer:

2

Black MasticNDNDNDNDND5FT 12x12 Black Spec1711J47-

052AA-52

Layer:

1


053AA-53

Layer:

1


054AA-54

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDCove base Brown1711J47-

055AA-55

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 19 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDCove base Brown1711J47-

055AA-55

Layer:

1

Floor tileNDNDNDNDNDNDFT 12x12 Black1711J47-

056AA-56

Layer:

2

GlueNDNDNDNDNDNDFT 12x12 Black1711J47-

056AA-56

Layer:

1

Floor tileNDNDNDNDNDNDFT 12x12 Black1711J47-

057AA-57

Layer:

2

GlueNDNDNDNDNDNDFT 12x12 Black1711J47-

057AA-57

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDPlaster1711J47-

058AA-58

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 20 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDPlaster1711J47-

058AA-58

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDPlaster1711J47-

059AA-59

Layer:

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDPlaster1711J47-

059AA-59

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDStair Cover1711J47-

060AA-60

Layer:

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDStair Cover1711J47-

060AA-60

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDExt Caulk Window1711J47-

061AA-61

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 21 of 22


27-Nov-17


AES Job Number:


Client Name:


1711J47



AMCH CR AN TR AC

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDExt Felt1711J47-

062AA-62

Layer:

2

NDNDNDNDNDNDExt Felt1711J47-

062AA-62

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDExt Awning1711J47-

063AA-63

Layer:

1

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDExt Awning1711J47-

064AA-64

Layer:

1

NDNDNDNDNDNDExt Tar Paper Roof1711J47-

065AA-65

Layer:


ND = None Detected





Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.







Page 22 of 22

November 28, 2017

Dear Order No:

RE:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received samples on for the analyses presented in following report.

17

No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated

Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies associated with the

analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a project Case Narrative.

AES’s accreditations are as follows:

-NELAP/State of Florida Laboratory ID E87582 for analysis of Non-Potable Water, Solid & Chemical

Materials, Air & Emissions Volatile Organics, and Drinking Water Microbiology & Metals, effective

07/01/17-06/30/18.

State of Georgia, Department of Natural Resources ID #800 for analysis of Drinking Water Metals, effective

07/01/17-06/30/18 and Total Coliforms/ E. coli, effective 04/25/17-04/24/20.

-NELAP/Louisiana Agency Interest No. 100818 for or analysis of Non-Potable Water and Solid & Chemical

Materials, effective 07/01/17-06/30/18.

-AIHA-LAP, LLC Laboratory ID: 100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Metals, PCM Asbestos,

Gravimetric), Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal)

Direct Examination, effective until 11/01/19.

These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full.

If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.

Sincerely,

Project Manager

1711K10

Spencer CoxUnited Consulting Group Inc.

625 Holcomb Bridge RdNorcross GA 30071

DeKalb DOT Yard

Ioana Pacurar

11/20/2017 10:40:00 AM

Spencer Cox:

Page 1 of 7

Page 2 of 7

28-Nov-17Date:Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Client:

Case NarrativeDeKalb DOT Yard


Lab ID:

Project:

1711K10

Lead in Paint Analysis by Method NIOSH 7082:

For sample 1711K10-015A which was submitted with less than 0.100g of material for analysis, values are reported with elevated

reporting limits.

Page 3 of 7

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 28-Nov-17

United Consulting Group Inc. TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (NIOSH 7082)

Matrix:

Lab Order: 1711K10

Paint

Date Received:

Project: DeKalb DOT Yard

11/20/2017 10:40:00 AM

Client:

Reporting

LimitAnalystUnitsResultClient Sample IDLaboratory ID

Date

Analyzed

Date

CollectedDF Qual

1711K10-001A L-1 BRL wt% 0.00901 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-002A L-2 BRL wt% 0.00791 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-003A L-3 BRL wt% 0.00959 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-004A L-4 BRL wt% 0.00968 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-005A L-5 BRL wt% 0.00937 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-006A L-6 BRL wt% 0.00939 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-007A L-7 0.0263 wt% 0.0118 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-008A L-8 BRL wt% 0.00996 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-009A L-9 BRL wt% 0.00908 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-010A L-10 BRL wt% 0.00855 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-011A L-11 18.4 wt% 1.04 100 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-012A L-12 BRL wt% 0.00855 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-013A L-13 BRL wt% 0.00857 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-014A L-14 BRL wt% 0.00814 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-015A L-15 BRL wt% 0.0119 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-016A L-16 0.0722 wt% 0.00861 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

1711K10-017A L-17 0.0694 wt% 0.00987 1 11/16/2017 11/27/2017 NG

Qualifiers: BRL - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit DF - Dilution Factor

B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 4 of 7

SAMPLE/COOLER RECEIPT CHECKLIST

1. Client Name: AES Work Order Number:

2. Carrier: FedEx UPS USPS Client Courier Other

Yes No N/A Details Comments

3. Shipping container/cooler received in good condition? damaged leaking other

4. Custody seals present on shipping container?

5. Custody seals intact on shipping container?

6. Temperature blanks present?

7.Cooler temperature(s) within limits of 0‐6⁰C? [See item 13 and 14 for temperature recordings.]

Cooling initiated for recently collected samples / ice present

8. Chain of Custody (COC) present?

9. Chain of Custody signed, dated, and timed when relinquished and received?

10. Sampler name and/or signature on COC?

11. Were all samples received within holding time?

12. TAT marked on the COC? If no TAT indicated, proceeded with standard TAT per Terms & Conditions.

13. Cooler 1 Temperature ⁰C Cooler 2 Temperature ⁰C Cooler 3 Temperature ⁰C Cooler 4 Temperature ⁰C

Cooler 5 Temperature ⁰C Cooler 6 Temperature ⁰C Cooler 7 Temperature ⁰C Cooler 8 Temperature ⁰C

15. Comments:

I certify that I have completed sections 1‐15 (dated initials).


16. Were sample containers intact upon receipt?

17. Custody seals present on sample containers?

18. Custody seals intact on sample containers?

19. Do sample container labels match the COC?incomplete info illegible

no label other 20. Are analyses requested indicated on the COC?

21. Were all of the samples listed on the COC received?samples received but not listed on COC

samples listed on COC not received22. Was the sample collection date/time noted?

23. Did we receive sufficient sample volume for indicated analyses?

24. Were samples received in appropriate containers?

25. Were VOA samples received without headspace (< 1/4" bubble)?

26. Were trip blanks submitted? listed on COC not listed on COC

27. Comments:

I certify that I have completed sections 16-27 (dated initials).


28. Have containers needing chemical preservation been checked? *

29. Containers meet preservation guidelines?

30. Was pH adjusted at Sample Receipt?

I certify that I have completed sections 28‐30 (dated initials). Page 5 of 7

tech

Typewritten Text

28-Nov-17Date:Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Client:

BatchID:Workorder:

Project Name:ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT

DeKalb DOT Yard

1711K10


251972

RPT Limit QualAnalyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPD Limit

SampleType: BatchID: Analysis Date: Seq No:TestCode: 251972MBLK 11/27/2017TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT by NIOSH 7082

Units: Prep Date:Sample ID: Client ID: Run No:wt% 11/24/2017 357666MB-251972

7883534

Lead 0.0100BRL


SampleType: BatchID: Analysis Date: Seq No:TestCode: 251972LCS 11/27/2017TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT by NIOSH 7082

Units: Prep Date:Sample ID: Client ID: Run No:wt% 11/24/2017 357666LCS-251972

7883535

Lead 0.1280.6813 0.6010 113 80 120


SampleType: BatchID: Analysis Date: Seq No:TestCode: 251972MS 11/27/2017TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT by NIOSH 7082

L-3 Units: Prep Date:Sample ID: Client ID: Run No:wt% 11/24/2017 3576661711K10-003AMS

7883538

Lead 0.009560.05445 0.0478 114 75 125


SampleType: BatchID: Analysis Date: Seq No:TestCode: 251972MSD 11/27/2017TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT by NIOSH 7082

L-3 Units: Prep Date:Sample ID: Client ID: Run No:wt% 11/24/2017 3576661711K10-003AMSD

7883539

Lead 0.009600.05484 250.0480 114 75 125 0.05445 0.707

Qualifiers:

J Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

BRL Below reporting limit H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N Analyte not NELAC certified

B Analyte detected in the associated method blank

E Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

< Less than Result value> Greater than Result value

R RPD outside limits due to matrix

Rpt Lim Reporting LimitPage 6 of 7

End of Report

Page 7 of 7


APPENDIX D

Georgia Asbestos Notification Requirement for Demolition, Renovation, or Abatement Projects

Documents

Report - DeKalb County, GA