1
LETTER – BREAST ONCOLOGY Reply to ‘‘Anti-cytokeratin CAM5.2 Recognized CK8 Mainly, but not CK18: Comment on ‘Early Assessment of Axillary Response with 18 F-FDG PET/CT During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II–III Breast Cancer: Implications for Surgical Management of the Axilla. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(7):2227–35’’’ Bas B. Koolen, MD, PhD 1,2 and Jelle Wesseling, MD, PhD 3 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2 Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 3 Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands TO THE EDITORS: We agree with Chao and Han that uncertainty exists about the cytokeratins recognized by the CAM5.2 antibody in immunohistochemistry. 1,2 It has become clear from immunoblot experiments that CAM5.2 is specific for cytokeratin 8 and to a lesser extent for the closely related cytokeratin 7, but not for cytokeratin 18. 3,4 Nevertheless, CAM5.2 is generally accepted to be suitable for detection of metastatic breast cancer in (sentinel) lymph nodes because almost all breast carcinomas also strongly express cytokeratin 7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST None REFERENCES 1. Koolen BB, Valde ´s Olmos RA, Wesseling J, et al. Early assessment of axillary response with 18 F-FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II–III breast cancer: implica- tions for surgical management of the axilla. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2227–35. 2. Chao WR, Han CP. Anti-cytokeratin CAM5.2 recognized CK8 mainly, but not CK18: comment on ‘‘early assessment of axillary response with 18 F-FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II–III breast cancer: implications for surgical management of the axilla.’’ Ann Surg Oncol. (in press). 3. Makin CA, Bobrow LG, Bodmer WF. Monoclonal antibody to cytokeratin for use in routine histopathology. J Clin Pathol. 1984;37:975–83. 4. BD Biosciences. Anti-cytokeratin (CAM 5.2). Specification sheet. http://www.bdbiosciences.com/external_files/is/doc/tds/Datasheets_ RUO/live/web_enabled/23-1336-09-347653-347204-349205-DS- ruo.pdf. Ó Society of Surgical Oncology 2013 First Received: 22 August 2013; Published Online: 20 September 2013 B. B. Koolen, MD, PhD e-mail: [email protected] Ann Surg Oncol (2014) 21:700 DOI 10.1245/s10434-013-3273-2

Reply to “Anti-cytokeratin CAM5.2 Recognized CK8 Mainly, but not CK18: Comment on ‘Early Assessment of Axillary Response with 18F-FDG PET/CT During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in

  • Upload
    jelle

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

LETTER – BREAST ONCOLOGY

Reply to ‘‘Anti-cytokeratin CAM5.2 Recognized CK8 Mainly,but not CK18: Comment on ‘Early Assessment of AxillaryResponse with 18F-FDG PET/CT During NeoadjuvantChemotherapy in Stage II–III Breast Cancer: Implicationsfor Surgical Management of the Axilla. Ann Surg Oncol.2013;20(7):2227–35’’’

Bas B. Koolen, MD, PhD1,2 and Jelle Wesseling, MD, PhD3

1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam,

The Netherlands; 2Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital,

Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 3Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek

Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

TO THE EDITORS:

We agree with Chao and Han that uncertainty exists

about the cytokeratins recognized by the CAM5.2 antibody

in immunohistochemistry.1,2 It has become clear from

immunoblot experiments that CAM5.2 is specific for

cytokeratin 8 and to a lesser extent for the closely related

cytokeratin 7, but not for cytokeratin 18.3,4 Nevertheless,

CAM5.2 is generally accepted to be suitable for detection

of metastatic breast cancer in (sentinel) lymph nodes

because almost all breast carcinomas also strongly express

cytokeratin 7.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST None

REFERENCES

1. Koolen BB, Valdes Olmos RA, Wesseling J, et al. Early

assessment of axillary response with 18F-FDG PET/CT during

neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II–III breast cancer: implica-

tions for surgical management of the axilla. Ann Surg Oncol.

2013;20:2227–35.

2. Chao WR, Han CP. Anti-cytokeratin CAM5.2 recognized CK8

mainly, but not CK18: comment on ‘‘early assessment of axillary

response with 18F-FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy

in stage II–III breast cancer: implications for surgical management

of the axilla.’’ Ann Surg Oncol. (in press).

3. Makin CA, Bobrow LG, Bodmer WF. Monoclonal antibody to

cytokeratin for use in routine histopathology. J Clin Pathol.

1984;37:975–83.

4. BD Biosciences. Anti-cytokeratin (CAM 5.2). Specification sheet.

http://www.bdbiosciences.com/external_files/is/doc/tds/Datasheets_

RUO/live/web_enabled/23-1336-09-347653-347204-349205-DS-

ruo.pdf.

� Society of Surgical Oncology 2013

First Received: 22 August 2013;

Published Online: 20 September 2013

B. B. Koolen, MD, PhD

e-mail: [email protected]

Ann Surg Oncol (2014) 21:700

DOI 10.1245/s10434-013-3273-2