1
Arch Gynecol Obstet (2011) 284:1049 DOI 10.1007/s00404-011-2029-0 123 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Reply: Placenta previa and perinatal mortality Gali Pariente · Eyal Sheiner Received: 13 July 2011 / Accepted: 16 July 2011 / Published online: 4 August 2011 © Springer-Verlag 2011 Dear Editor, We thank Dr Matsubara for the interest in our study. Our study demonstrated an increased risk of perinatal mortality by 5.6 times among patients with placenta previa. However, while using a multivariable logistic regression model, with perinatal mortality as the outcome variable, controlling for confounders, such as preterm birth, maternal age, intra uterine growth restriction (IUGR), etc., placenta previa was not found as an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality [1]. The present analysis, which surely has its inherent limitations, is, to the best of our knowledge, one of the larg- est analyses reported to date considering placenta previa and perinatal mortality. This analysis does support an increase in perinatal mortality among pregnancies with placenta previa in comparison with those without it. Never- theless, it seems that the mortality is not attributed to the previa per se, but rather to the associated risk factors. Moreover, similar to the results of the current study, a pre- vious study performed in our medical center found higher rates of perinatal mortality in pregnancies complicated with placenta previa [2]. However, while using multivariable analysis investigating risk factors for perinatal mortality, placenta previa per se was actually found as a protective factor against the occurrence of perinatal mortality while controlling for confounders. There are many examples over the history of medicine in general, and obstetrics in particular, of beliefs that have been based on assumptions, concerns and personal impression rather than on facts and evidence based medi- cine. We cautiously attempt otherwise. Whether it is the previa per se or not, this condition, undoubtedly, is sig- niWcantly associated with adverse perinatal outcome, and accordingly careful surveillance is recommended with timely delivery in order to reduce the associated complications. ConXict of interest No conXict of interest exists. References 1. Rosenberg T, Pariente G, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A, Sheiner E (2011) Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284(1):47–51 2. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hallak M, Hershkowitz R, Katz M, Mazor M (2001) Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors, pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Med 10(6):414–419 G. Pariente · E. Sheiner (&) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O Box 151, Be’er Sheva, Israel e-mail: [email protected]

Reply: Placenta previa and perinatal mortality

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Reply: Placenta previa and perinatal mortality

Arch Gynecol Obstet (2011) 284:1049DOI 10.1007/s00404-011-2029-0

123

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Reply: Placenta previa and perinatal mortality

Gali Pariente · Eyal Sheiner

Received: 13 July 2011 / Accepted: 16 July 2011 / Published online: 4 August 2011© Springer-Verlag 2011

Dear Editor,

We thank Dr Matsubara for the interest in our study. Ourstudy demonstrated an increased risk of perinatal mortalityby 5.6 times among patients with placenta previa. However,while using a multivariable logistic regression model, withperinatal mortality as the outcome variable, controlling forconfounders, such as preterm birth, maternal age, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), etc., placenta previa wasnot found as an independent risk factor for perinatalmortality [1].

The present analysis, which surely has its inherentlimitations, is, to the best of our knowledge, one of the larg-est analyses reported to date considering placenta previaand perinatal mortality. This analysis does support anincrease in perinatal mortality among pregnancies withplacenta previa in comparison with those without it. Never-theless, it seems that the mortality is not attributed to theprevia per se, but rather to the associated risk factors.Moreover, similar to the results of the current study, a pre-vious study performed in our medical center found higherrates of perinatal mortality in pregnancies complicated withplacenta previa [2]. However, while using multivariableanalysis investigating risk factors for perinatal mortality,

placenta previa per se was actually found as a protectivefactor against the occurrence of perinatal mortality whilecontrolling for confounders.

There are many examples over the history of medicinein general, and obstetrics in particular, of beliefs that havebeen based on assumptions, concerns and personalimpression rather than on facts and evidence based medi-cine. We cautiously attempt otherwise. Whether it is theprevia per se or not, this condition, undoubtedly, is sig-niWcantly associated with adverse perinatal outcome, andaccordingly careful surveillance is recommended withtimely delivery in order to reduce the associatedcomplications.

ConXict of interest No conXict of interest exists.

References

1. Rosenberg T, Pariente G, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A, Sheiner E(2011) Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placentaprevia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284(1):47–51

2. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hallak M, Hershkowitz R, Katz M,Mazor M (2001) Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors, pregnancyoutcome. J Matern Fetal Med 10(6):414–419

G. Pariente · E. Sheiner (&)Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O Box 151, Be’er Sheva, Israele-mail: [email protected]