Republic of the Philippines OFFICE OF THE CITY PROSECUTOR Manila ANTONIO N. SUGPATAN, Complainant, -versus- VIRGILIO GUEVARRA, RHOGIE NIKKO DEL ROSARIO and MARK BUENCAMINO FLORES, Respondents. x------------------------------ ----------------------x XV-07-INV-15G-03586 Charge: Attempted Murder REPLY-AFFIDAVIT I, Antonio Nase Sugpatan, of legal age, with residence no. 4334 H- Albina St. Sta. Mesa Manila, after being duly sworn in accordance to law, do hereby depose and state that: I hereby reiterate and replead all the positions and arguments contained in my Complain-Affidavit as may be considered material and relevant in this Reply-Affidavit. As can be gleaned in the Counter-Affidavit submitted by here in respondent they merely concentrated on evading their liabilities by denying their acts of false representation. Respondent wanted to prove and convince this Honorable office, that the accusation against me as stated on the Counter-Affidavit of Virgilio Guevarra was the very reason why he had commited a crime and the cause of the incident that had happened on May 2, 2015. This accusation was supported by another prospect Rogie del Rosario as he mentioned in his Counter-Affidavit that he heard me saying “Putanginang yan, Gago yan.”.
Republic of the PhilippinesOFFICE OF THE CITY
PROSECUTORManilaANTONIO N.SUPATAN!Co"plainant!#$e%sus#&IRI'IO
UE&ARRA! RHOIE NI((O)E' ROSARIO an* MAR(
+UENCAMINOF'ORES!Respon*ents.,####################################################,-./#IN#.2134Cha%5e6
Atte"pte* Mu%*e%REP'Y#AFFI)A&ITI! Antonio Nase Su5patan! of
le5al a5e! 7ith %esi*ence no. 8228 H# Albina St. Sta. Mesa
Manila!afte% bein5 *ul9 s7o%n in acco%*ance to la7! *o he%eb9
*epose an* state that6I he%eb9 %eite%ate an* %eplea* all the
positions an* a%5u"ents containe* in "9 Co"plain#Affi*a$itas "a9 be
consi*e%e* "ate%ial an* %ele$ant in this Repl9#Affi*a$it.As canbe
5leane*inthe Counte%#Affi*a$it sub"itte*b9he%e in%espon*ent
the9"e%el9concent%ate* on e$a*in5 thei% liabilities b9 *en9in5
thei% acts of false %ep%esentation.Respon*ent 7ante* to p%o$e an*
con$ince this Hono%able office! that the accusation a5ainst "eas
state* on the Counte%#Affi*a$it of &i%5ilio ue$a%%a 7as the
$e%9 %eason 7h9 he ha* co""ite* a c%i"ean* the cause of the
inci*ent that ha* happene* on Ma9 :!
:.01.Thisaccusation7assuppo%te*b9anothe%p%ospect Ro5ie*el
Rosa%ioashe"entione*inhisCounte%#Affi*a$it that he hea%* "e sa9in5
;Putan5inan5 9an! a5o 9an.D That Ma%=+uenca"inoFlo%es!
b%othe%#in#la7of the%espon*ent *i*not suppo%t this
clai"*espitethefact ofhi"bein5%elate*to
&i%5ilioue$a%%aunli=eRo5ie*elRosa%io7ho7asEustthebo9f%ien* of
Sa"antha ;Sa"< +o"bais ue$a%%a! *au5hte% of &i%5ilio
ue$a%%a.That (a5a7a* i5i )a7isof +%59. 1F2Gone 13!)ist%ict4 Manila
canp%o$ethat thisne$e%happene* because she 7as the%e at the sto%e
of )e*ith Ro*%i5ueA.In se$e%al occasions! %espon*ent *enie* ha$in5
*ea*l9 7eapon on the ni5ht 7hen the inci*ent ha*happene*. In the
Counte%#Affi*a$it that he ha* sub"itte* @see pa5e :! Pa%a5%aph fB!
he a*"itte* that it7as t%ue that he bo%e a "echanical tool bein5
use* fo% his "oto%c9cle.Respon*ent *i* not clea%l9 state if 7hat
=in* of "echanical tool it 7as that he clai"e* he use*fo%
self#*efense. To suppo%t this alle5ation! %espon*ent p%esente*
se$e%al *ocu"ents p%o$in5 that he 7as ape%son 7ith *isabilit9
@PC)B. ;No one is abo$e the la7
