Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Aarhus Convention and Renewable Energy:
A discussion of article 13 Renewable Energy Directive
Marjan Peeters ICOS conference 29 november 2013
Renewable Energy in the EU: a framework approach
Directive 2009/28/EC: • 20 % renewable energy consumption in 2020 • Legal obligation for member states • Differentiated targets • Large discretion: national renewable energy
action plans • Compliance mechanism: ex ante and ex post • Trading among member states allowed
Planned (blue) versus estimated (red/dotted) trend in EU renewable energy
• http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/reports/doc/com_2013_0175_res_en.pdf
Renewable Energy Activities: - Electricity production ànd storage
- Heating and cooling - Distribution networks
Geothermal Heating & Cooling (Heerlen, Nethelands)
Storage of renewable electricity, Elbe Canal, Germany
Push from the European Commission and EP Committee on Industry, Research and Energy : • “A one-stop shopping approach is desirable” (EP committee,
2008). • “The availability of a single administrative body for dealing
with renewable energy project authorizations … is still limited” (Commission 2013)
Committee of the Regions: decrease the pressure to set up
centralized, single administrative bodies
Quote from the Commission: “Simplification of administrative regimes”
Article 13 Administrative procedures, regulations and codes 1. Member States shall ensure that any national rules concerning the authorisation, certification and licensing procedures that are applied to plants and associated transmission and distribution network infrastructures for the production of electricity, heating or cooling from renewable energy sources, and to the process of transformation of biomass into biofuels or other energy products, are proportionate and necessary.
List of requirements in article 13(1)
MS have to ensure: 1) Clear coordination of governmental responsibilities,
with transparent timetables 2) Comprehensive information to applicants 3) Streamlining and expediting procedures 4) Simplified and less burdensome authorisation
procedures, including through simple notification if allowed by the applicable regulatory framework, for smaller projects
Critical observation 1: Is it necessary to have article 13 RED?
- Each Member State has to reach its RE target - The Commission can enforce that target (that
is crucial) - Article 13 is a means towards an end, not a
goal in it self
Implementation of article 13
Commission: (2013 progress report COM(2013)175) - “progress in removing administrative barriers is still limited and slow” - often no reporting from MS (required according to art. 22(3) RED) - Commission announces to launch infringement proceedings where Member States fail to act (but what can exactly be enforced? )
Critical observation 2: Other EU environmental law might be
applicable in case of an “article 13” procedure
Puglia case C-2/10: substantive decisions like a total prohibition for wind energy are covered by article 13 RED (?) • Water Framework Directive (hydro power, storage projects) • Habitat Directive (wind energy, solar energy)
-> see case C/2-10, Windmills in Puglia • Waste Framework Directive (biomass) • Industrial Emissions Directive (biomass)
Critical observation 3: How to align article 13 RED with
the Aarhus Convention ?
• Renewable energy projects might be covered by article 6 Aarhus Convention
• “Activities … which may have a significant effect on the environment.” (art. 6(1)(b).
• In that case, article 13 has to be combined with an appropriate public participation procedure as required by Article 6 AC
Contradiction of spirits
Aarhus Quick procedures
Critical observation 4 The `Nimby’ effect of the Aarhus
Convention • Local resistance against for instance biomass plants
and wind energy farms • The Public Concerned might consist of opponents to
renewable energy • For example: Mr Swords, Ireland
(ACCC/C/2010/54 concerning compliance by the European Union, on 29 June 2012): http://www.turn180.ie/
How to overcome NIMBY ?
National developments (Denmark) -> Financial arrangements: - provide citizens with adequate compensation for losses and hindrance - require renewable energy operators to let local communities and citizens participate into the economic business of renewable energy -> Are these provisions indeed proportionate and necessary?
Conclusion • A push towards harmonisation of administrative
law by article 13 for the sake of renewable energy • Article 13 is however vague and seems hardly
enforceable through infringement proceedings • Moreover, a string of EU laws ànd the Aarhus
Convention has to be complied with, if applicable • The binding targets are a bigger push for MS to
move forward with renewable energy, and, in this vein, to establish adequate procedures
• But only if compliance will be reached or be pushed for
Thank you
The case of Windmills in Puglia,
Italy
“HELLO PUGLIA” “Puglia is full of enchanting towns that you can visit
during your holidays: ... rocky hills, medieval towns, fields of windmills, poppies and sunflowers ...”
Puglia, Italy: Total prohibition on windmills in
natura 2000 area • The local government issued a total prohibition on
windmills in a legally protected natural area • Case (preliminary question) referred to the Court of
Justice of the EU: is this total prohibition legally acceptable?
• Art. 13 Renewable Energy Directive: all procedures for renewable energy should be “proportionate and necessary”.
Court of Justice EU, C-2/10
It is required that “measures adopted by Member States … do not
exceed the limits of what is appropriate and necessary in order to attain the objectives legitimately pursued by the legislation in question;
when there is a choice between several appropriate measures recourse must be had to the least onerous, and the disadvantages caused must not be disproportionate to the aims pursued”
Puglia c’tnd
• The total prohibition was accepted by the Italian court
http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/reports/doc/2013_renewable_energy_progress.pdf