Upload
penelope-shepherd
View
215
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT COMPETITION ASEAN ENERGY AWARDS 2011:
Submission and Guidelines
ASEAN Centre for Energy
Category Criteria
Pre-Qualification Regional Competition
Distribution of Scores Format of Presentation Submission Judging/Scoring/Announcement of Winners Prizes Awarding Ceremony
CONTENTS
GUIDELINES
3 CATEGORY NO. OF WINNERS• OFF – GRID 1 – REGIONAL WINNER 2 – RUNNERS-UP • ON – GRID* 1 – REGIONAL WINNER 2 – RUNNERS-UP• COGENERATION - do - CRITERIA
A. PRE-QUALIFICATION:
The project must be in operation for at least one (1) year.
Note: * - Applicable to utility grid and local-based grid.
GUIDELINES
B. 5 MAJOR CRITERIA:
1. ORIGINALITY
2. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATION
3. TECHNICAL, ECONOMIC, AND MARKET CONSIDERATION
4. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SCHEME
5. REPLICABILITY
GUIDELINES 1. ORIGINALITY
Design, Application, Approach (e.g.multi-sectoral, etc.)
2. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATION
Amount of emissions avoided (CO2, etc. in tons/yr)
Community/People Participation
Benefits
- User, community, country
Other features
GUIDELINES 3. TECHNICAL, ECONOMIC, AND MARKET CONSIDERATION - Installed capacity - Technical Design - Technical Performance - Investment cost - Financial scheme / livelihood projects - Funder (Government and Non-Govt) - Market size (potential within 5 years) - Local Manufacturing / Content of System
- Amount of energy avoided
GUIDELINES
4. OPERATING & MAINTENANCE SCHEME Operational hours (day/month/year) Maintenance scheme (In-house, Contracted out service, Government, others) Other Maintenance measures (training, after- sales service) Local service content
5. REPLICABILITY - Relevance, Impact, Efficiency
- Cost Effectiveness (No, Low, High cost)- Sustainability of project - Others (specify)
GUIDELINES – Distribution of Scores
No. Criteria (On-Grid & Off-Grid) In %
1. Originality 10.00
2. Environmental & SocialConsideration
15.00
3. Technical, Economic & Market Consideration
35.00
4. Operating & Maintenance Scheme 20.00
5. Replicability 15.00
6. Presentation of Document 5.00
Total 100.00
GUIDELINESNo Criteria (Cogeneration) In %
1. Technical Merits- Quality and completeness of documentation- Heat utilisation, reliability, technical soundness and equipment efficiency- Fuel supply security
25.00 5.0015.00
5.00
2. Commercial viability- Project IRR- Quality and status of contractual/security arrangements
25.0015.0010.00
3. Environmental/National/Social benefits- Global impact (CO2, CH4, N2O)- Local impact (NOx, SOx, particulates)- National, social, and community impact
25.0010.0010.00 5.00
4. Demonstration value/Replicability- Geographical spread, replicability, and sustainability- Technical and environmental improvement compared to- baseline
25.0015.00
10.00
Total 100.00
GUIDELINES Presentation Format: Max. 15 pages DISCUSSION AREAS NO. OF PAGES 1. Originality (Item 1&2) 2 2. Energy & Environmental Consideration 3. Technical, Economic, Market (Item 3-5) 7 and Social Consideration 4. Operating and Maintenance Scheme 5. Replicability 6. Figures, Tables, Photo 5 7. Title Page 1 A4 size / 12 cpi / Times Roman
GUIDELINES
SUBMISSION
A. DEADLINE - 16 May 2011 - 15 PAGE – SUBMISSION (advanced copy) must be received by ACE 10 days before the final judging.
B. REQUIREMENT - Endorsement letter from the RE-SSN Focal Point - Authorization letter from the owner to visit the project - 10 original copies in a sealed envelope to be brought
by the Focal Points or may be mailed to the Focal Point of a hosting country.
C. MAXIMUM SUBMISSION/COUNTRY: 2 Projects/Category
GUIDELINES JUDGING/SCORING/ANNOUNCEMENT OF WINNERS:1. One country one vote system.2. Each project will be reviewed simultaneously by the judges for a period of 30 minutes. Score sheet may be filled up temporarily within the given period.3. A Judge must not be allowed to evaluate NRSE project entry/ies that originate from the country that she/he represents.4. At the end of the judging session, the judges will be given 30 minutes to review and compare the points given to each of the project entry. Final score sheet for each candidate will be placed in an envelope with proper identification of the judges (name and signature).
GUIDELINES JUDGING/SCORING/ANNOUNCEMENT OF WINNERS:
6. No questions will be entertained during and after the judging
process. Submissions must be judged on the merit of the
presentation.
7. Individual tally sheets will be tabulated by ACE and two
witnesses, nominated by the Board.
8. Final Tally Sheets will be handed over to the ACE Coordinator,
immediately after the individual score sheets have been
tallied bearing the authentic signatures of the ACE representative
and 2 witnesses.
9. The Chairman of the Board shall report the proceedings of the
judging including the official announcement of winners at the
Annual Meeting of the NRSE-SSN.
GUIDELINES PRIZES - FOR THE WINNERS : TROPHY AND PLAQUE - NON-WINNERS : PLAQUE OF APPRECIATION AWARDING CEREMONY:
- In conjunction with the official dinner
of 29th AMEM/SOME and AEBF 2011,
Brunei Darussalam, September 2011