Upload
trannguyet
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Renewable energy policy and Ontario wind turbinedevelopment
Margaret S. Loudermilk
Ivey Business SchoolWestern University
Ontario Network for Sustainable Energy PolicyApril 20-22, 2016
1 / 22
Motivation
“social license” has become a central issue in the development of energyinfrastructure projects
policy makers and project proponents want to understand the factorscontributing to resistance to the development of energy infrastructure
interest in social license often focuses on pipelines, but the problem of sociallicense extends to all forms of energy
focusing on renewable energy projects decouples concerns related to theproduct from the specific project (e.g., hydrocarbons/Keystone XL)
rapid development of wind turbine projects in Ontario over the past decadeaccompanied by policy changes and a perceived increase in local resistance tothe construction of wind turbines provides an opportunity for both qualitativeand quantitative analysis.
2 / 22
Background: Renewable Electricity Policy in Ontario
2003 ON government publicly announced renewable power targets forOntario (targets were not legislated)
2004 1st round of RFPs for renewable energy capacity issued under theRenewable Energy Supply (RES) program
additional rounds in 2005 and 2007yielded average rates of $0.08-0.09/kWh
2006 Renewable Energy Standard Offer Program (RESOP) launchedpaid $0.11/kWhsize limit of 10 MW per projectlimited time to bring contracted project into operation
2009 Green Energy Act (GEA) simplified the approval process forrenewable energy projects and new Feed-In-Tariff (FIT) program wasdeveloped to incentivize renewable energy projects
base prices for wind of $0.115-0.135/kWh
3 / 22
Wind Generation in Ontario - IESO
According to the IESO, in 2015 wind output reached 6% of total generationproduction, producing 9 Terawatt-hours (TWh), and comprised 10% of installedenergy capacity with 96 commercially operating, contracted projects and acumulative capacity of 4,377 MW.
Source: IESO, A Progress Report on Contracted Electricity Supply: Fourth Quarter 2015.
4 / 22
Wind Generation in Ontario - CANWEA
According to the Canadian Wind Energy Association, in 2015 wind generationcomprised 79 installed projects and a cumulative capacity of 4,361 MW.
Source: Data as of December 31, 2015 from Canadian Wind Energy Association.
5 / 22
Wind Generation in Ontario - Number of Projects?
IESO 96 commercially operating, contracted projects and 4,377 MW
CANWEA 79 installed projects and 4,361 MW
FIT 84 FIT contract offers
REA 69 Renewable Energy Approval applications submitted (2 refused, 5withdrawn, 1 under review, 61 approved)
6 / 22
Approach
1 Construct a database of Ontario wind turbine project development andmeasures of social resistance
2 Perform qualitative analyses through case studies and geographicinformation system (GIS) techniques
3 Merge project database with socio-demographic data and projectimpact data
4 Perform statistical analysis of factors affecting the project developmentprocess and determinants of social resistance
7 / 22
Previous Related Work
Stokes (forthcoming, Amer. J. Pol. Sci,) - Constructed a database of ON FITcontracted wind projects to determine the effect of local resistance on electionof incumbents. 2,753 proposed or operational turbines and 65 wind projectsidentified.
Christidis and Law (2013, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf) - Compile data on preexistingwind farms and create a GIS map for use in environmental health research.The paper includes discussion of inconsistencies across publicly availableOntario wind farm data. 1,420 wind turbines from 56 different wind farmsidentified.
Many papers written on social resistance to wind power, primarily in otherjurisdictions and using case study methods that focus on a single or smallgroup of projects (Breukers and Wolsink, 2007; Eltham et al.,2008; Gross,2007; Jobert et al., 2007; Jones and Eiser, 2010; Swofford and Slattery, 2010;Songsore and Buzzelli, 2014; etc.)
8 / 22
Data Collection
Goal: capture project development and “social resistance data for everyproposed, operating, or withdrawn/cancelled wind power project in ON
Variables: Site name, location, ownership, project status, generation contractregulatory proposals/approvals/durations/appeals/comments,proposed/approved/actual capacity and number of turbines,press releases, media articles, legal cases, municipal/countydeclared “unwilling host”, et al.
Sources: Ontario Power Authority/Independent Electricity System OperatorOntario Energy BoardMinistry of the Environment and Climate ChangeCanadian Wind Energy Associationdeveloper, municipality, wind action group, and newspaper web siteslegal and media databases, et al.
9 / 22
Data: Wind Generation Projects
Wind Projects by StatusOperating 98Construction 20Proposed 12Withdrawn/Cancelled 48Unknown 17Total 195
Number of Projects Affected“Social Resistance” 97Legal Cases 61Regulatory Appeals 61Unwilling Host Declaration 69
Projects by Generation ContractFIT 114RESOP 52Standard Generation 29Total 195
Projects by RegulationPre-GEA 76Post-GEA 119Total 195
Note: Data as of end of 2015
10 / 22
All ON Wind Power Projects
¹ 0 110 220 330 44055Km
Wind Turbine Sites
Wind Turbine Sitesin Ontario
Map composed by Alex Cebulski on November 1, 2015
11 / 22
Southwest ON Projects by Status
Sudbury
Nipissing
Algoma
Renfrew
Grey
Parry Sound
Hastings
Simcoe
Bruce
Huron
Muskoka
York
LanarkHaliburton
Ottawa
Perth
Frontenac
ElginLambton
Durham
Middlesex
Peterborough
Oxford
Essex
Manitoulin
Wellington Peel
NiagaraBrant
Dufferin
Chatham-Kent
Waterloo Halton
Kawartha LakesLeeds and Grenville
Haldimand-Norfolk
Lennox and Addington
Hamilton
Northumberland
Greater Sudbury / Grand Sudbury
Toronto
Prince Edward
Timiskaming
¹ 0 50 100 150 20025Km
StageN/AActiveProposedWithdrawn
Stage of Wind Turbine Developmentin Southwest Ontario
Map composed by Alex Cebulski on November 1, 2015
12 / 22
Projects by Date of Proposal
Sudbury
Algoma
Nipissing
Renfrew
Timiskaming
Grey
Parry Sound
Hastings
SimcoeBruce
Huron
Muskoka
York
LanarkHaliburton
Perth
Frontenac
Ottawa
ElginLambton
Durham
Middlesex
Peterborough
Oxford
Essex
Manitoulin
Wellington Peel
NiagaraBrant
Dufferin
Waterloo
Kawartha LakesLeeds and Grenville
Chatham-Kent
Haldimand-Norfolk
Halton
Lennox and Addington
Hamilton
Northumberland
Greater Sudbury / Grand Sudbury
Toronto
Prince Edward
¹ 0 60 120 180 24030Km
Site Proposal2002 - 20042005 - 20062007 - 20092010 - 20122013 - 2015
Date of Site Proposal for Wind Turbine Sitesin Southwest Ontario
Map composed by Alex Cebulski on November 1, 2015
13 / 22
Data: Measures of Resistance
14 / 22
Social Resistance
Sudbury
Nipissing
Algoma
Renfrew
Grey
Parry Sound
Hastings
Simcoe
Bruce
Huron
Muskoka
York
LanarkHaliburton
Ottawa
Perth
Frontenac
ElginLambton
Durham
Middlesex
Peterborough
Oxford
Essex
Manitoulin
Wellington Peel
NiagaraBrant
Dufferin
Chatham-Kent
Waterloo Halton
Kawartha LakesLeeds and Grenville
Haldimand-Norfolk
Lennox and Addington
Hamilton
Northumberland
Greater Sudbury / Grand Sudbury
Toronto
Prince Edward
Timiskaming
¹ 0 50 100 150 20025Km
Social Resistance01
Number of Wind Turbines0 - 1314 - 3637 - 7273 - 123124 - 270
Wind Turbine Site Social Resistancein Southwest Ontario
Map composed by Alex Cebulski on November 1, 2015
15 / 22
Legal Cases
Sudbury
Nipissing
Algoma
Renfrew
Grey
Parry Sound
Hastings
Simcoe
Bruce
Huron
Muskoka
York
LanarkHaliburton
Ottawa
Perth
Frontenac
ElginLambton
Durham
Middlesex
Peterborough
Oxford
Essex
Manitoulin
Wellington Peel
NiagaraBrant
Dufferin
Chatham-Kent
Waterloo Halton
Kawartha LakesLeeds and Grenville
Haldimand-Norfolk
Lennox and Addington
Hamilton
Northumberland
Greater Sudbury / Grand Sudbury
Toronto
Prince Edward
Timiskaming
¹ 0 50 100 150 20025Km
Legal Resistance01
Number of Wind Turbines0 - 1314 - 3637 - 7273 - 123124 - 270
Wind Turbine Site Legal Resistancein Southwest Ontario
Map composed by Alex Cebulski on November 1, 2015
16 / 22
Regulatory Appeals
Sudbury
Nipissing
Algoma
Renfrew
Grey
Parry Sound
Hastings
Simcoe
Bruce
Huron
Muskoka
York
LanarkHaliburton
Ottawa
Perth
Frontenac
ElginLambton
Durham
Middlesex
Peterborough
Oxford
Essex
Manitoulin
Wellington Peel
NiagaraBrant
Dufferin
Chatham-Kent
Waterloo Halton
Kawartha LakesLeeds and Grenville
Haldimand-Norfolk
Lennox and Addington
Hamilton
Northumberland
Greater Sudbury / Grand Sudbury
Toronto
Prince Edward
Timiskaming
¹ 0 50 100 150 20025Km
Appeal01
Number of Wind Turbines0 - 1314 - 3637 - 7273 - 123124 - 270
Wind Turbine Site Appealin Southwest Ontario
Map composed by Alex Cebulski on November 1, 2015
17 / 22
Preliminary Results:
Turbines_marchNumber of Turbines
0 - 2930 - 7778 - 140
141 - 270
271 - 715
Median Income0.00 - 8346.008346.01 - 22684.0022684.01 - 30118.0030118.01 - 35592.0035592.01 - 46028.00
0 1 2 3 40.5Kilometers ±
Number of Turbines Versus Median Income
Data from Statistics Canada. Coordinate System NAD 1983. Composed by Alex Cebulski.18 / 22
Preliminary Results:
Turbines_marchNumber of Turbines
0 - 2930 - 7778 - 140
141 - 270
271 - 715
% With Post Secondary Education0.157894737 - 0.3131313130.313131314 - 0.3873015870.387301588 - 0.4346924670.434692468 - 0.5020501140.502050115 - 0.700000000
0 1 2 3 40.5Kilometers ±
Number of Turbines Versus Percent of Population with Post Secondary Education
Data from Statistics Canada. Coordinate System NAD 1983. Composed by Alex Cebulski.19 / 22
Preliminary Results:
Turbines_marchNumber of Turbines
0 - 2930 - 7778 - 140
141 - 270
271 - 715
Median Shelter Cost0.00 - 50135.0050135.01 - 160388.00160388.01 - 240575.00240575.01 - 370095.00370095.01 - 647478.00
0 1 2 3 40.5Kilometers ±
Number of Turbines Versus Median Shelter Cost
Data from Statistics Canada. Coordinate System NAD 1983. Composed by Alex Cebulski.20 / 22
Preliminary Results:
REA Comments0 - 4344 - 168169 - 297
298 - 1602
1603 - 2874
Median Shelter Cost0.00 - 50135.0050135.01 - 160388.00160388.01 - 240575.00240575.01 - 370095.00370095.01 - 647478.00
0 1 2 3 40.5Kilometers ±
Number of Renewable Energy Act Comments Versus Median Shelter Cost
Data from Statistics Canada. Coordinate System NAD 1983. Composed by Alex Cebulski.21 / 22
Summary & Next Steps
Only considering active/operating/installed projects misses themajority of wind development projects in ON and maysignificantly bias conclusions about social license issues
No obvious patterns emerge from case study or GIS maps ofwind development projects
Public census data is too aggregated for meaningful statisticalanalysis in differences in community acceptance of winddevelopment sites
Need to merge project dataset with census microdata and landcover data to further quantitative analysis
22 / 22