Upload
kevin-franklin
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RENEWABLE ENERGY IN EASTERN EUROPE
Dr. Willibald Plesser
Vienna Economic Forum, 10 November 2008
FACTS AND FIGURES
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP is a leading international law firm with 28 offices worldwide and over 2,500 lawyers
Our practice groups are acknowledged to be market leaders in their respective areas of law
We have been active in the CEE region for many years
We offer commitment to close client relationship, providing tailored solutions for complex transactions
We have a Firm culture of confidence, commitment, respect and mutual trust
WHERE WE ARE
We advise on transactions in the following countries across the region:
Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Republic of Moldova, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Turkey and Ukraine
RENEWABLE ENERGY MARKET TRENDS
Global investment in sustainable energy broke all previous records, with $148.4 billion of new money raised in 2007
No great impact of the financial crisis. Overall global investment during the first half of 2008 has been just above what was seen in the first half of 2007
It takes on average 50% more energy to produce a unit of GDP in the CEE region than it does in western Europe
The EU-mandated renewable energy targets play a key role in stimulating demand of renewable energy in CEE
FUTURE POTENTIAL
Highest future potential in wind and hydroelectric power (Croatia and Slovakia for hydroelectric, Poland/Romania/Estonia for wind)- relatively cheap and benefits largely from the geographical characteristics
in the region- In the past 15 years, the cost of wind energy has more than halved, and its
production per unit of capacity has more than doubled- Often large (+ 200 MW) hydro schemes are developed in the form of
Public-Private Partnership
Good prospects for biomass and geothermal energy (Poland and Hungary)
Lower potential for biogas energy, solar energy and wave energy
No potential for landfill gas energy
OVERVIEW OF THE WIND ENERGY MARKET IN CEE
Poland 276 2,16013,600
Czech Rep. 116 6804,000
Bulgaria 70 1,6403,450
Hungary 65 5801,600
Romania 8 2,0204,000
Estonia
Wind capacity in main Eastern European countriesMW Installed Permitted &
2007 In planningPotential
Total 535 7,08026,650
Five countries – Poland, Bulgaria, Czech Republic,
Hungary and Romania – have
an estimated wind potential capacity
of 26.7GW and 535MW installed capacity at 2007
year end
Current announced
development pipelines total
c.7GW
Wind power capacity installed in Eastern Europe in 2007
Source: New Energy Finance, EWEA
Poland
Czech Rep.
Hungary
Romania
Bulgaria
Cumulated installed capacity at 2007 year end
Installed capacity during 2007
8
5
70
34
65
4
116
63
276
109
Overview of incentives in place in main EE countries
Slovakia
5
0
Croatia17
0
Lithuania 50
7
Latvia27
0
Estonia58
26
Country 2008 rates (€/MWh)Incentives
Green certificates value: €73/MWh
Current elec. prices: €76/MWhPoland
Green Certificate
s
Green certificates value: €42/MWh
Current elec. prices: €50/MWhRomania
Green Certificate
s
Fixed: €94-€125/MWh Premium: €71-€103/MWh
Czech Republic
Feed-in tariffs
€84-105/MWh Hungary Feed-in tariffs
€80/MWh (>2250 hr/yr) €90/MWh (<2250 hr/yr)Bulgaria Feed-in
tariffs
Duration
-
-
15 years
Plant lifetime
12 years
MACRO ENVIRONMENT
The macro environment for renewable energy has
improved in Eastern Europe since 2003 with electricity prices now in
line with the average price in the EU-15
These markets are now facing the same energy
supply and electricity price situation as other
European countries, creating a more
favourable environment for renewable energy
Electricity demand has remained relatively constant in Eastern
European markets with price increases being
driven by replacement of ageing conventional
fossil and nuclear capacity, rising gas
prices and price increases following
market liberalisation
20
40
60
80
100
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Bulgaria Romania Czech Republic Hungary Poland Estonia EU-15
Average industrial electricity prices 1996-2007
Electricity generation by source 2005
Note: Romanian domestic oil supply accounts for 20% of generation or 34% of the oil & gas segment shown here
Source: New Energy Finance
Hungary Bulgaria Romania Czech Republic Poland
Hydro & biomass
Oil & gas
Nuclear
Hard coal & lignite
10.1m toe 10.5m toe
27.4m toe32.4m toe
77.7m toe
€/MWh
MARKET CHARACTERISTICS AND TRENDS
Hungary and the Czech Republic lead the way
with the most generous tariff schemes
However Poland, Bulgaria and Romania appear to be the most likely targets for rapid,
large-scale expansion as they have reasonably high tariffs, pro-wind
governments and significant areas of good
wind resources
This environment has encouraged independent
developers and multinational power
companies to acquire and invest in
development pipelines often alongside their
acquisition of electricity generation and
distribution companies
3.012.72
2.54 2.45
1.95
1.44
1.82
2.82
Hungary Czech Republic Romania Poland Bulgaria Slovakia Germany UK
NPV of tariffs from 1MW of installed wind capacity1
€m/MW
(1) Net present value of tariffs per MW of installed capacity. Assumes a 25% capacity factor, an expected 6.5% real rate of return, inflation of 3% annually, project life of 20 years, and constant green certificate prices in Poland and Romania
Source: New Energy Finance
Foreign (32%)
Domestic (68%)
Foreign and domestic ownership of wind development pipeline assets in 20071
Total capacity 2.3 GW
Development through fragmented local developers Consolidation started in Poland Recent entrance of large European utilities players already
present in the region through their conventional power plant building programmes or acquisitions of local utilities
Partnership with local developers
Consolidation via major international players is likely to dominate the sector in the near future
Note: (1) Based on pipeline located in Bulgaria, Czech Rep, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia Source: New Energy Finance
AUTHORISATION PROCESS IN CEE COUNTRIES
Except Hungary where lead time
for overall procedure tends to exceed three
years, other countries have relatively short
lead times, below a year
For countries such as Hungary and
Slovakia, rejection rates exceed 70%
In most cases, missing grid
capacity represents a
crucial factor for rejections
Source: EU, March 2008, Report on promotion and growth of renewable energy sources
47%
27%
50%
80%
Bulgaria Czech Rep. Hungary Poland
Authorities involved in the permission procedure Lead time for the authorisation procedure
Average rate of permit rejections (%) Projects involving grid capacity problems
Share of projects with grid capacity problems (%)
6%
97%
1%
69%
Czech Rep. Hungary Poland Slovakia
0
10
20
30
40
Bulgaria CzechRep.
Hungary Lithuania Poland Slovakia
Number of authorities Lead time (months)
0
10
20
30
40
Bulgaria Czech Rep. Hungary Poland Slovakia
Lead time for overall procedure Lead time for grid connection
Rate of permit rejections (%)
WIND SOURCES IN EUROPE
Poland, Romania and Bulgaria offer
the best wind resources in
Eastern Europe
0 2 4 6 8 10
0 5 10 15 20
m/s
mph
POLAND
CZECH REP
SLOVAKIA
ROMANIA
BULGARIA
HUNGARY
LITHUANIA
LATVIA
ESTONIA
EU TARGETS IN RENEWABLE ENERGY
Source: EU Commission, 2008. Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources
7.0%
3.8%
1.8%
1.8%
1.7%
1.2%
1.1%
0.9%
0.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
11.8
%
Source: Eurostat EWEA
Source: EWEA, Eurelectric
Wind share of EU electricity demand (2007)
Wind capacity in the EU by end of 2007
kW /1000 inhabitants
Individual country targets
Share of renewable energy 2005
Gap to target 2020
341
270
114
46 42 39 39 15 12 11 9 7 7
MECHANISMS TO SUPPORT RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION IN EUROPE
Characteristics of mechanism: Strength/ Weakness:
• Electricity suppliers are obliged to have a certain proportion of their electricity from renewable sources
• Renewable Energy Certificate is a tradable commodity proving that certain electricity is generated using renewable energy sources (per MWh)
• Certificates are traded to fulfill renewable obligations
• Renewable power generators receive wholesale market price for generated power plus the value of the certificate
• Forces suppliers to take action to meet their obligation, market based system should drive costs down
• Lack of revenue certainty, cost of administration, failure to support immature technologies
Quota obligation & tradable certificates
• Renewable energy producers are paid a fixed tariff:– Instead of pool price
(Feed–in tariffs)– In addition to pool price
(Price premium)• Tariffs usually vary
depending on technology, capacity and age of power plant and are typically limited in time
• Price and investment certainty
• Political risk, cost to consumers, generators does not receive CO2 upsideFeed–in
tariffs
Main types of support mechanism
Quota obligation & tradable certificates
Feed–in tariffs
Source: EREF – Prices for renewable energies in Europe: Feed in tariffs versus quota systems – a comparison, 2006–200; Datamonitor – Are national policies sufficient to drive renewable investment? – April 2007; EC [52]; BMU (January 2007); FORRES 2020 – Analysis of the renewable energy sources‘ evolution up to 20020 (Fraunhofer et al, April 2005)
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Poland
Slovakia
Czech Republic
Romania
Bulgaria
Hungary
FACTORS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS IN THE REGION
Fast growing economies, meaning increased need for energy
Plentiful resources (geographical)
CO2 emission trading
EU law in EU member states (meaning similar basic parameters, but not all relevant laws have necessarily been adapted yet)
Support schemes / investment subsidies / tax incentives / other financial support schemes
Green energy trade
Legal conditions improving
Feed-in tariffs and purchase obligations
More support measures to be introduced
FACTORS AGAINST RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS IN THE REGION
Grid capacity and access (limitation)
High investment costs
Political instabilities / political opposition led by environmental and social concerns (environmental protection legislations)
Regulatory transparency and a secure basis for investment (some states do not necessarily have a clear regulatory structure and transparent authorization procedures)
Planning reliability and investment protection (some states)
Often changing laws and regulations
Sometimes negative attitude to RES and no voluntary demand
Exhaustion of resources (like hydropower in Czech Republic)
Monopolistic structure of power markets
CURRENT RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS
EVN AG (Austria) will build in cooperation with the Statkraft (Norway) several hydropower plants on the Drin river in Albania with a total installed capacity of 319 MW in a € 1 bln investment
Verbund (Austria) will build a 48.2 MW hydropower plant in Ashta, Albania in a € 160 mln investment
German HSH Nordbank recently announced it will finance the € 285 mln construction of four wind farms in Poland, which will later be sold to Danish energy company Scan Energy
German alternative energy company Wallenborn is planning to build a 48 MW wind power park in southwestern Hungary's Gyorkony in a € 74.7 mln investment
RWE Innogy GmbH, Essen, has secured access to wind power projects with a total capacity of 200 MW in Poland