Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Removing the Rust-A Seminar for the Seasonal Runner
David Bernhardt, M.D.Department of Pediatrics, Orthopedics and Rehab
Objectives
• Formulate a plan to start running, improving your fitness
• Understand the possible intrinsic and extrinsic factors which may contribute to overuse injuries
• Guide return to activity if you are injured
Resources
• UW Sports Medicine Clinic 263-8850
• UW Sports Physical Therapy Clinic 263-4765 – Gait analysis– Flexibility– Core strengthening program
Resources
Starting point
• Goals
• Training plan to reach your goal
• Flexible
Training plan• Base – starting point depends on fitness
level
• Core strength– Core Running by Mark Verstegen
• Cross train
• Time to reach your goal
Overuse Injuries
• Common cause of most running injury
• Stress fracture• Tendinitis
Stress fracture
• Tiny cracks in bone
• “march” or “fatigue” fractures
• Bone fracture which usually results from repetitive overload
BONE OVERLOAD• Imbalance between
bone formation and bone destruction
• Osteoblasts: bone matrix formation through production of type 1 collagen, non-collagenous protein and regulatory factors
http://sprojects.mmi.mcgill.ca/bonephysio/index.htm
• Osteoclasts: bone resorption
• Extracellular matrix– Collagen fibers– Ground substance– Inorganic matrix - Ca
and PO4
Mechanical Load Bone Strain
Damage > Remodeling
Stress Reaction
Stress Fracture
Complete Fracture
Mechanical Load
• Weight
• Intrinsic factors – skeletal, muscle, joint, biomechanical factors
Strain
• Change in length per unit of length of a bone
• Repetitive strain usually results in microdamage
• Imbalance of damage and repair leads to stress continuum
Risk of damage
• Magnitude and rate of introduction of the applied load
• Absolute number of loading cycles
Risk Factors• Extrinsic
– Sport– Training – Equipment– Environment
• Intrinsic– Biomechanical
factors– Fitness– Gender
Sprinters – high load, short duration– Foot: metatarsal, tarsal stress fractures
Distance runners – cyclic overload– Proximal stress fractures: tibial, femur
Training Error
• Insufficient time for remodeling or repair
Increase training Increase # of boneremodelling units
Porous bone, Increase strain
Training error• Increase in bone
loading cycles (miles)• Increased intensity
(speed)
• Sports camps• Year-round training
• HOW MUCH IS TOO MUCH?
Equipment
Shoes Inserts
Attenuate load
Kinetic chain
Intrinsic Risk Factors• Fitness
• Biomechanical Factors (Cavus vs planus foot)
• Muscle
• Gender
• Diet: eating disorders, low vitamin D
Pronation
• Limited pronation increases the magnitude of impact loading
• Increases foot flexibility• Attenuates ground reaction impact
forces• Couples with internal rotation of tibia
during first half of stance phase
Menstrual Hx & Bone Health• Extended periods of oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea
may have a residual effect on lumbar BMDDrinkwater B et al. JAMA 1990
Menstrual history & Diet
• SF: older at menarche
• SF: hx of menstrual disturbance
• SF: higher score on EAT-40
• SF: restrictive dieting
Bennell KL Clin J Sports Med 1995
Risk Factors among Young Female CC Runners
• N = 127• 18-26 yo• Stress fracture
confirmed by radiology test
• Baseline BMD, body comp
• Follow-up ave 1.85 y
Kelsey JL, Bachrach LK, et al. MSSE 2007: 39:1457-63
Risk Factor• 891 female Marine recruits• 6.8% with total of 66 stress fractures• Initial 0.86 per 1000 TDE*• Subsequent 3.0 per 1000 TDE
• RF: slowest quartile, secondary amenorrhea
• *training day exposure
Rauh MJ, Macera CA, et al. MSSE 2006
Diagnosis
• Pain localized close to a bone in the lower extremity
• Focal tenderness
Diagnostic tests - xrays• Usually negative in
first 4 weeks
Diagnostic tests - MRI
Sofka CM. Clinics in Sports Medicine 2006
Diagnosis
• Stress reaction: negative xray, positive bone scan with focal tracer uptake
• Stress fracture: positive xray with periosteal rxn
• No clear difference in prognosis
Diagnosis
• Stress reaction: negative xray, periosteal edema, marrow edema
• Stress fracture: negative xray, marrow edema, low signal in the intramedullary bone surrounded by edema
Grading
• I: periosteal edema• II: more severe periosteal edema with
marrow edema on T2 images only• III: moderate to severe edema or
periosteum and marrow on T1 and T2• IV: fracture line present
Fredericson M et al. Am J Sports Med 1995
Prognosis
• I: 2-3 weeks• II: 4-6 weeks• III: 6-9 weeks• IV: cast for 6 weeks and 6 weeks of
non-impact
Fredericson M et al. Am J Sports Med 1995
Prognosis• Fracture line
correlates with longer rest time
Yao L et al. Acad Radiol 1998 (abstract)
Location• Tibial (anterior
tibial*)• Metatarsal• Calcaneal• Tarsonavicular*• Fibular• Femoral• Femoral neck*
• Pelvic – ischial ramus, ischial tuberosity, sacrum
*High-risk stress fxs
High risk
• Risk to progress to complete fracture– Tension side femoral
neck– Anterior cortex,
middle 1/3 tibia– Tarsal navicular
Treatment principles• Rest – activity
modification• Equipment• Immobilization• Weight bearing• Nutritional concerns• Hormonal concerns• Bone stimulator?
• Non-impact exercise– Stairmaster– Elliptical– Water jogging
Treatment
• Correct malalignment• Cross-train• Relative rest• Follow-up q 4 weeks• Allowed to return when non-tender on
examination and no pain with easy running
Return to activity….
• PT consult
• Adaptation
• 5-10% per week rule
Orthotics?
• Orthotic influence differs between running and walking
• Research filled with controversy regarding subject selection, measurement, results, individual foot patterns, kinetic chain
• Success in reducing pain may be more trial and error
References• Bennell K.L., Malcolm S.A., Thomas S.A., et al. The incidence and distribution of stress
fractures in competitive track and field athletes: a twelve-month prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 : 211-7.
• Corris EE. Tarsal navicular stress fractures. Am Fam Physician 2003; 67:85-90.
• Heiderscheit B, Hamill J, Tiberio D. A biomechanical perspective: do foot orthoses work? Br J Sports Med 2001; 35:4-5.
• Jones MH. Navicular stress fractures. Clin Sports Med 2006; 25:151-8.
• Kudo P, Dainty K et al. Randomized Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial Evaluating the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis with an Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) Device: A North American Confirmatory Study. J Orthop Research 2006; 24:115-123.
• Placzek R, Deuretzbacher G, et al. Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitiis with Botulinum Toxin A. Clin J Pain 2006; 22:190-92
• Guten GN. Running Injuries. Saunders Publishing 1997.