Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Background
Maize has been considered
globally as the most important
agricultural grain which is
staple food in many countries
and feed to livestock
Call to promote maize
production on the continent to
achieve self-sufficiency by
2015
Ngie et al., 2014
Background (cont’d)
The high genetic variation within
grown maize cultivars has
practically meant a tough
challenge to readily differentiate
them morphologically on the field
unless expensive and labour
intensive techniques are utilised.
Ngie et al., 2014
Spectral characteristics of vegetation leaves
Reflection of light at the leaf-level depends primarily on
pigments and internal structure of the leaf.
Agricultural studies use measurements in the visible
(400-700nm wavelength) and near infrared (700-1100nm
wavelength) region of the electromagnetic spectrum.
Large differences in the spectral characteristics of the
soil and crop, especially at the red edge is usually used
in vegetation studies.
The red edge point is where the electromagnetic
spectrum changes from visual to near infrared (680-
760nm)
Ngie et al., 2014
Spectral characteristics of vegetation leaves
The spectral
characteristics of
healthy vegetative
surfaces are
distinctive with low
reflectance in blue,
high in green, very
low in red and very
high in the near
infrared (NIR).
Ngie et al., 2014
Hyperspectral remote sensing and vegetation studies
Hyperspectral remote sensing technology is made up of
narrow and contiguous bands which makes it is possible
to distinguish variations of absorption features that are
not possible with multispectral sensors (Li, 2006).
The unique spectral signatures of features resulting from
the absorptive or emissive factors in hyperspectral
sensors allows much finer sampling of vegetation and
other materials
Ngie et al., 2014
Action Vegetation type Author(s)
Vegetation
identification
Teas Chen et al., 2007
Discrimination of plant
species
Pears; Wheat; Shrubs
& trees; tomatoes
Fu et al., 2007; Wang
et al., 2006; Cho et al.,
2008; Xu et al., 2009
Discrimination of
cultivars of
Sugar cane in Brazil Galvão et al., 2005
Estimate biochemical
content like nitrogen
Wheat; sugar cane Yao et al., 2010; Abdel-
Rahman et al., 2010
Ngie et al., 2014
While some studies have used simply the spectral
reflectance curve to evaluate the identification of
different vegetation types (Beck, 2003), others have
tested the use of different vegetation indices at both leaf
and canopy levels to discriminate species (Cho et al.,
2008).
Aim and Hypothesis
The purpose of this paper was
to demonstrate the potential of
hyperspectral remote sensing
technology in the differentiation
of maize cultivars at foliar level.
Hypothesis: that cultivar related
characteristic differences at
foliar level produce different
spectral responses that can be
detected with high spectral
resolution sensors.
Ngie et al., 2014
Materials
Used the hand held Portable Spectroradiometer (PSR-
3500 series) to measure the reflectance spectra from the
leaves of eight different maize cultivars planted under
field conditions.
Ngie et al., 2014
The Leaf-clip of the
handheld Portable
Spectroradiometer
(PSR-3500 series
of Spectral
Evolution Inc.,
USA)
Spectral measurements
Maize leaf spectra
measurements were
collected on February 4th,
2014 in Reitz, Free State
province of South Africa
The cultivars included
DKC 78-79 BRGEN, BT 1
YGI Mon 810, 8216 BR,
KKS 8301, PAN 3Q-222,
Imp 51-92 R, SC 602
Kuilvoer, P 31 M 05 R and
some experimental ones.
Ngie et al., 2014
Spectral measurements
Leaf samples were collected and
measurements taken in-doors
with the leaf-clip, avoiding the
mid-rib region.
About ten target measurements
were made after each
measurement on the reference
panel.
The spectra data obtained from
these measurements were then
used to create reflective curves.
Ngie et al., 2014
Spectral measurements
Through statistical
analyses relevant bands
were selected which
showed differences
between the maize
cultivars.
The Tukey-Kramer HSD
(honest significant
difference) was applied to
show how significant were
the differences at each
band in discriminating
cultivars.
Ngie et al., 2014
Reflectance curves of maize cultivars
Spectral
portions of the
890-990nm,
1355-1450nm
and 1800-
1950nm
Ngie et al., 2014
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Re
fle
cta
nce
%
Wavelength (nm)
Mean_DKC
Mean_BT
Mean_BR
Mean_KKS
Mean_PAN
Mean_IMP
Mean_SC
Mean_P
Statistical analysis
The NIR region showed
successful results in
separating some
cultivars between three
and six out of the eight.
The intersection angles
showing no intersections
or slight intersections of
less than 90 degrees
mean significant
difference while those of
intersections greater
than 90 degrees are
insignificant
Ngie et al., 2014
37.5
40
42.5
45
47.5
50
52.5
B5
0
BR
BT
DK
C
IMP
KK
S
PA
N
PIO
NE
ER
SC
Cultivar
All Pairs
Tukey-Kramer
0.05
Statistical analysis (cont’d)
The Tukey-Kramer HSD Threshold matrix shows the actual
absolute difference in the means minus the HSD (Abs (Dif)-
HSD), which is the difference that would be significant. Pairs
with a positive value are significantly different.
Ngie et al., 2014
Abs(Dif)-HSD KKS BR PAN SC DKC IMP PIONEER BT
KKS -0.512 1.423 2.342 2.863 4.402 5.301 5.549 11.160
BR 1.423 -0.512 0.407 0.928 2.467 3.366 3.614 9.225
PAN 2.342 0.407 -0.512 0.008 1.548 2.447 2.694 8.305
SC 2.863 0.928 0.008 -0.512 1.027 1.926 2.174 7.785
DKC 4.402 2.467 1.548 1.027 -0.512 0.387 0.634 6.245
IMP 5.301 3.366 2.447 1.926 0.387 -0.512 -0.265 5.346
PIONEER 5.549 3.614 2.694 2.174 0.634 -0.265 -0.512 5.099
BT 11.160 9.225 8.305 7.785 6.245 5.346 5.099 -0.512
Statistical analysis (cont’d)
The Tukey-Kramer HSD test
resulted in 27 possible pair
combinations of discrimination
between the six out of eight
(75%) maize cultivars.
All pairs were significantly
different.
Ngie et al., 2014
Statistical analysis (cont’d)
Ngie et al., 2014
Level - Level Difference Std Err Dif Lower CL Upper CL p-Value Difference
B BT 11.67275 0.1603193 11.1603 12.18521 <.0001* BR BT 9.73775 0.1603193 9.2253 10.25021 <.0001* PAN BT 8.81783 0.1603193 8.3054 9.33030 <.0001* SC BT 8.29750 0.1603193 7.7850 8.80996 <.0001* DKC BT 6.75783 0.1603193 6.2454 7.27030 <.0001* B PIONEER 6.06125 0.1603193 5.5488 6.57371 <.0001* IMP BT 5.85883 0.1603193 5.3464 6.37130 <.0001* B IMP 5.81392 0.1603193 5.3015 6.32638 <.0001* PIONEER BT 5.61150 0.1603193 5.0990 6.12396 <.0001* B DKC 4.91492 0.1603193 4.4025 5.42738 <.0001* BR PIONEER 4.12625 0.1603193 3.6138 4.63871 <.0001* BR IMP 3.87892 0.1603193 3.3665 4.39138 <.0001* B SC 3.37525 0.1603193 2.8628 3.88771 <.0001* PAN PIONEER 3.20633 0.1603193 2.6939 3.71880 <.0001* BR DKC 2.97992 0.1603193 2.4675 3.49238 <.0001* PAN IMP 2.95900 0.1603193 2.4465 3.47146 <.0001* B PAN 2.85492 0.1603193 2.3425 3.36738 <.0001* SC PIONEER 2.68600 0.1603193 2.1735 3.19846 <.0001* SC IMP 2.43867 0.1603193 1.9262 2.95113 <.0001* PAN DKC 2.06000 0.1603193 1.5475 2.57246 <.0001* B BR 1.93500 0.1603193 1.4225 2.44746 <.0001* SC DKC 1.53967 0.1603193 1.0272 2.05213 <.0001* BR SC 1.44025 0.1603193 0.9278 1.95271 <.0001* DKC PIONEER 1.14633 0.1603193 0.6339 1.65880 <.0001* BR PAN 0.91992 0.1603193 0.4075 1.43238 <.0001* DKC IMP 0.89900 0.1603193 0.3865 1.41146 <.0001* PAN SC 0.52033 0.1603193 0.0079 1.03280 0.0443* IMP PIONEER 0.24733 0.1603193 -0.2651 0.75980 0.7799
Statistical analysis (cont’d)
The mean reflectance values for each maize cultivar in
summary indicates the six of eight cultivars separated
as levels not connected by same letter are significantly
different.
Ngie et al., 2014
Level Mean
KKS A 50.527250
BR B 48.592250
PAN C 47.672333
SC D 47.152000
DKC E 45.612333
IMP F 44.713333
PIONEER F 44.466000
BT G 38.854500
Conclusion
The results validated the
hypothesis that the genetic
constituent of different cultivars
at foliar level would influence
their reflectance levels at
different wavelengths through
high resolution sensors.
Ngie et al., 2014
Recommendations
There is the possibility of
integrating such in-situ
hyperspectral measurements
with space-borne hyperspectral
remote sensing data for
automatic identification and
discrimination of various maize
cultivars grown on the fields.
Ngie et al., 2014