Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Reintegration and Reunification of Children to Families
Ian A Forber-Pratt, MSW
Ian’s lived and professional experience
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Adopted from IndiaRaised in America in a mixed-race family
Direct practice work in the foster care system in AmericaFounder of a foster care organization in IndiaGlobal advocate for child care system reform
15 years of working with children and families
Current Positions:
Director of Global Advocacy
Children’s Emergency Relief International (CERI)
Executive Director
Institute for Child Welfare Innovation
Adjunct Faculty
The Brown School at Washington University in St
Louis
* Please note - the slides are text heavy so that they can stand alone later for those
unable to attend
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Three Part Talk30 Minutes with 30 Minutes Q&A
(I may go a bit over 30 minutes; I tend to do that....)
Part I - Reintegration and Reunification
Part II - Systems Change at 10,000 ft
Part III - Practice Model
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Goals of this presentation:
1. Challenge you so you can challenge me (in
real time or later via email);
2. share about the global care system reform that
is going on;
3. expose you to an actual intervention/ toolkit on
how to help children and families reunify and
reintegrate; and
4. leave you “hanging” and ready to know more.
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
PART IReintegration and Reunification
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Reintegration: The process of a separated child making
what is anticipated to be a permanent transition back
to his or her immediate or extended family and
community (usually of origin), in order to receive
protection and care and to find a sense of belonging and
purpose in all spheres of life.
Reunification: The physical reuniting of a child and his
or her family or previous caregiver with the objective of
this placement becoming permanent.
Delap, E., & Wedge, J. (2016). Guidelines on children's reintegration. Report, Inter.
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Case Study - it is not always the outcome you’d expect…. do you stop working?
• Two parents, HIV positive, one with tuberculosis• Left the hospital without their children directly after the birth of their second boy and
attempted suicide. They survived. • The children came into the care of the community partner (who provide residential
care to children). • Community partner eventually contacted the parents, counselled, connected them to
resources and started reunification.• Worked a reintegration plan and eventually children and parents reunited. • Parents eventually started showing increasingly risky behaviors (leaving the children
alone, being unpredictable with employment, disappearing sporadically without notice)
• Couple became pregnant with a third child and then relinquished all the children to the authorities (without telling the community partner)
• Community partner, during follow up, found the children in a government home (split up by age and traumatized)
• Currently two younger children being adopted together domestically and older children with the community partner and undergoing treatment for trauma.
SYSTEMS BELIEVE THAT ‘THE APPLE DOESN’T FALL FAR FROM THE TREE’
I work with community partners around
the globe who are willing to expand their
services to include more family-based
care (kinship care, family reunification
and reintegration, foster care and
community-based care.
This case study is real-life and real-time.
India
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
PART IISystems Change at 10,000 ft
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Research shows that an institutional setting does not yield
positive results for a child’s development.
Children in institutions should be carefully and in their best
interest reintegrated with their families and communities
(with their culture of origin as the primary goal).
Children and families at risk of separation should be
supported, deescalated and sustainably empowered to
stabilize and sustain.
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Delap, E., & Wedge, J. (2016). Guidelines on children's reintegration. Report, Inter.
Systems reunify, people reintegrate.
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press. (my overlay of the policy change trajectory)
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
TAKE AWAY MESSAGE
De-institutionalization (specifically a greater focus on family reunification and reintegration) is a much needed reform to our global child care and protection systems when done correctly.
WITH A CAUTIONDe-institutionalization,
• if done too quickly, • without an understanding of implementation science, • and without multiple level buy-in (government, civil society, finances, etc.);
can cause harm!
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
PART IIIPractice Model
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
A promising practice model:
ACTIVE Family Support (AFS) by
Hope & Homes for Children
“This model of intervention has been prepared on the basis of 20 years of
practical experience in different countries, which are undergoing the process
of de-institutionalization. The model focuses on supporting children at risk of
institutionalization as well as on the reintegration of children into biological or
extended families. ”
- studied in Bosnia, Herzegovina, Rwanda, Bulgaria
I hope you’ll LOVE these forms - https://bettercarenetwork.org/sites/default/files/attachments/Preventing%20Separation%20Bosnia.pdf
And here is the citation for the quote above - https://childhub.org/en/system/tdf/library/attachments/afs-eng.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=29502
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
ACTIVE Family Support (AFS) by Hope & Homes for Children
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
ACTIVE Family Support (AFS) by Hope & Homes for Children
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
ACTIVE Family Support (AFS) by Hope & Homes for Children
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Case Study - success is the “norm”, failure is an outlier
• Zoya and her sibling taken into custody by local authorities due to neglect include issues with access to food, parents’ substance abuse, lack of supervision.
• Interventions started with the parents from CERI that included:• Parenting classes• Substance abuse treatment• Education/ empowerment for Zoya (teaching self-advocacy and addressing trauma)• Coordinating services around the family• Case management and monitoring
• 2 years later the family presents a peaceful, clean environment during home visits and Zoya and her sibling are actively involved in CERI programming.
Photo used with written consent by both
Zoya and her biological parents. Zoya is
not her real name.
INSERT PHOTO
Moldova
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
To sum it up:
Globally, child protection systems are moving towards a wide range of family-based care options as the primary solutions for the needs of children and families.
Huge pushes like the Families First Act in the US (2018), the Opening Doors Campaign and networks of work in Africa, Asia and Latin/ South America are creating waves.
Children “on the move” are increasing globally and their need to be reintegrated with family is monumental.
Prompt question - With the tool I presented and the information I shared, what can you do to impact family reunification and reintegration globally that empowers us to care
for each other better?
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Ian A Forber Pratt, MSW - [email protected]
Reintegration and Reunification of
Children to Families
Ian A Forber-Pratt, MSW